Home

Medical Doctors Across the U.S. Speak Out Against Mandatory Vaccination Laws

1 Comment

Health Impact News

Doctors

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

One of the myths propagated by the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media is that medical doctors are united in their support of mandatory vaccination laws.

This is simply not true. The medical doctors and physician groups that have taken a stand against mandatory vaccination laws are almost never interviewed in the corporate media, and if they are referred to at all, they are called “quacks.”

The largest medical association in the world is the American Medical Association (AMA), which has strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry and probably represents more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than any other trade group.

And yet, less than 25% of the licensed medical doctors in the United States are members of the AMA, down from 75% in the late 1950s.

So it would be incorrect to believe that the AMA represents the views of most of the physicians in the U.S. They do not.

Two other medical associations have come out with statements against mandatory vaccinations in the past couple of days, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and Physicians for Informed Consent.

You will not likely find their views expressed in the corporate-sponsored media outlets dominated by Big Pharma advertising revenues, and you will not see any of them invited to testify in any government hearings to discuss vaccination legislation.

AAPS-logotagline_web

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) just issued a press release this week:

Forced Vaccination Unnecessary, Violates Human Rights, States Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

More

Internet Trolls Attack Anyone Resisting the Vaccine Party Line Part #1

2 Comments

By Guest Columnist Marco Caceres di Iorio: Honduran Human Rights Activist and Editor of the online newspaper Honduras Weekly (1436 words)

https://idsent.wordpress.com/2015/11/10/internet-trolls-attack-anyone-resisting-vaccine-party-line/

Here’s how it usually goes: You say you have some doubts about vaccine safety and all those vaccinations the government requires you to give your kids. You say you’re concerned about serious side-effects you keep reading about, and particularly potential links to autism and autoimmune disorders, and the reports of encephalitis and shock. A typical response from mainstream proponents of vaccines would proceed like this…

“Oh, you’re being silly, you don’t know the science. Look, 99.9% of all doctors and scientists will tell you that vaccines are safe and effective. The science is solid, it’s long been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.”

Ninety-nine point nine percent. That sounds pretty convincing. Of course, it’s unclear what formula, study or survey was used to come up with that figure, so you start to do your own research, and you quickly realize there are lots of doctors and scientists, in addition to well informed parents, journalists and consumer advocates, who do not subscribe to the establishment’s mantra about vaccine safety and effectiveness. They do not believe the myth that the science is settled, and some are very vocal about their reservations or opposition to it.

The more you read, the more you start to realize that there is a growing chorus of doctors, scientists, nurses, and other health care providers who have serious questions about the current vaccine paradigm favored by the pharmaceutical industry, government agencies (such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] and Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), medical trade groups (such as the American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP], the American Medical Association [AMA], the American Academy of Family Practice [AAFP], etc, etc, and the mainstream media (which relies on Big Pharma’s advertising income that represents 70 % of annual revenues). More

Open Letter to Eric Holder Regarding the Big Pharma’s Campaign to Get Every Pre-Adolescent Child in America Vaccinated for HPV

2 Comments

new logoBy Gary G. Kohls, MD

______________________________________________________________

“There is a serious problem with vaccine safety. Vaccine aluminum adjuvant has adverse neurological effects, at dosages that are recommended by the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Vaccine critics are supported by the science. Parents refusing to vaccinate according to the recommended CDC schedule are supported by the science. Use aluminum-containing vaccines with great caution, or not at all….In young children, a highly significant correlation exists between the number of pediatric aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines administered and the rate of autism spectrum disorders.” — C. A. Shaw, Neural Dynamics Research Group, University of British Colombia

______________________________________________________________________

I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers…There is far too much financial interest for these medicines to be withdrawn.” — Dr. Bernard Dalbergue a former vaccpharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer Merck, in an interview published in the April 2014 issue of the French magazine Principes de Santé

The essence of this Duty to Warn column was written shortly after I viewed several videos (see links below) and long after I had read about – and occasionally heard personally – the anguished stories of scores of parents of vaccine injured children who are now autistic or chronically ill with vaccine-related autoimmune disorders.

I decided to email most of the information to Eric Holder of the U S Department of Justice after I had researched and read a number of basic neuroscience articles that addressed the dangers of adjuvants that are routinely included in common vaccines such as the HPV vaccine, particularly recent studies co-authored by Dr C. A. Shaw of the Neural Dynamics Research Group that is attached to the University of British Colombia.

Searching PubMed, it was relative pleasure to search through journal articles whose authors had been uncorrupted by pharmaceutical industry money and influence. (It is getting increasingly hard to find mainstream medical journal articles whose authors don’t have serious financial conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies or patient advocacy organizations (PAOs) , many of whom take “unrestricted grants” from pharmaceutical companies.)

Many concerned observers in the healthcare industry (especially the tens of thousands of parents of vaccine-injured children) regard the current CDC-mandated infant (over-)vaccination schedule as having created an epidemic of chronic illnesses, including the autism spectrum of disorders as well as the epidemic of autoimmune disorders that are responsible for many incurable chronic diseases.

Uncounted hundreds of thousands – perhaps millions – of now chronically-ill and autistic children were sickened coincident with the huge increase in vaccinations over the several decades, starting with the 20 inoculations per childhood in the 1980s to up to 68 inoculations per childhood by 2009. Those babies had been commonly injected with up to 9 aluminum and/or mercury-containing containing vaccines at one sitting, many of them being sickened rapidly or gradually over hours, days, or months. Please pay close attention to the following evidence, taking to heart what Dr. James A. Shannon of the National Institutes of Health once said: “The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.”

Alert: Before parents consider vaccinating any of their pre-adolescent daughters or sons with HPV, please pay attention to the following life-or-death information offered by board-certified nephrologist, researcher and scholar Dr Suzanne Humphries (an outspoken physician-whistle-blower who has never been co-opted by the vaccine industry) who knows more about the basic science – and the dangers – of vaccinations than just about anybody else that I know of in medicine. Dr Humphries talks about the connections between the over-vaccination of our children and the autism epidemic at:

This information was not just for Eric Holder, but also for those common sense correspondents of mine who know that there is truth behind the certainty of the parents of autistic spectrum disordered kids (and other fully vaccinated children who are also now coming down with an increasing variety of autoimmune and other chronic illnesses that tragically represent an estimated 1/3 of the fully vaccinated childhood population in America!). This epidemic of chronic illnesses will never be prevented in the future nor will they be curable unless the major root cause or causes are accurately identified (one of which is likely American’s over-vaccination policies: Please read on, and then act.

More

Ebo-Lie…from the Bolen Report

1 Comment

Bolon ReportThe Bolen Report website

Here’s What I Think…

by: Kenneth P Stoller, MD, FACHM

Thursday October 16th, 2014

With so much misinformation floating around about the latest viral scare, it is hard to know what is real and what isn’t.

Tim Bolen asked me to write this post after I posed a question to him… “When is a Federal agency, such as the CDC, no longer protected by the immunities a Federal agency normally has because they are engaged in activities that are not consistent with their own regulations and procedures?”

The CDC is responsible for vaccine safety and yet they own patents on, for example, the Ebola virus and could potentially profit from an Ebola vaccine – a vaccine that would not be needed if the virus doesn’t spread far and wide. Yet if the CDC helps control the spread of the virus they would be working against their own financial interest.

Not only that, they have potential martial law like authority to order citizens take interventions that they financially profit from. That sounds just like any other corporation. In fact, it sounds like regular, everyday corporations would drool to have the ability to create a problem, be positioned to profit from it, and be able to order people, or scare people enough to take what you have to sell. More

CDC Vaccine Secrets Revealed

5 Comments

 

PPJ Information/Resources

_______________________________________________________

Office of Medical and Scientific Justice

The CDC is playing a shell game with endorsing the safety of vaccines.  Even though the CDC pays for advertisements, they have a disclaimer that says that the contents of the advertising are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC, or in other words, don’t believe what they are saying.
 
Additionally, if you go to the CDC Vaccine Safety page, you will see that ALL of the scientific papers listed at the bottom of the page will take you to a third party websites. 
  
The CDC has a disclaimer that nullifies third party website information.  The disclaimer says:
 
•  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal site.
 
•  Linking to a non-federal site does not constitute an endorsement by HHS or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the site.

So, if the CDC doubts the claims made by its sources, why shouldn’t you?

Click this link to see the extensive list of the CDC’s “partners” in the vaccine scheme.

________________________________________________________

 

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/partners.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/Index1.html

http://www.cdc.gov/Other/disclaimer.html

Why am I categorically refusing the vaccine against influenza H1N1

Leave a comment

 

By: Jean-Jacques Crèvecoeurvaccty_dees
      Montréal (Québec – Canada)
       Ce 13 octobre 2009

This list of reasons are, only my own view.   They’re the conclusions I have arrived at after several months of thoroughly studying the scientific documents, official publications and declarations of medical authorities.

I’m giving you links to Internet sites so that you can check information yourself and give the whole issue further consideration.  As you will see, the reasons for my own refusal are many. I do not expect you to agree with my arguments since everyone has a different point of view. What I do invite you to do is to consider which, are the sentences, here that fit your own reality, and simply follow the voice of your conscience. In any case, only one reason should be enough to push you to refuse this vaccine. For you and for your close relations, it is your choice.

I refuse this vaccine because there isn’t any flu pandemic in 2009 yet More

%d bloggers like this: