Marti Oakley ©Copyright 2013 All rights reserved

Follow @MartiOakley

_____________________________________________________________________

Minnesota Department of Health: Coercion and entrapment

Question:  If vaccines actually work with any degree of efficiency (not efficacy), why would non-vaccinated individuals represent any kind of threat to the vaccinated?  Doesn’t the vaccine provide you with magical protection against whatever disease you supposedly took it for?

This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both.  The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination.  This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.

_______________________________________________________________

The Minnesota Department of Health is in the process of attempting to introduce even more vaccines into the mandated schedule for children from infancy, on.  The toxic load of heavy metals, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, fetal cell lines from aborted babies (diploids), DNA strands from non-related species such as chickens and swine, live and dead viruses, thimerisol, mercury and whatever else could be found to load the vaccines, has many parents wondering just what is really going on.  *Flu shots contain 25 micrograms of mercury. One microgram is considered toxic. By age two, most US children have received around 237 micrograms of mercury through vaccines alone. *See list below of contents of one vaccine alone**

Minnesota just recently banned formaldehyde in all products EXCLUDING VACCINES!

One childhood shot can contain as many as one million strands of someone or something else’s transfective DNA, now circulating in your child’s body.

So-called moral and social obligations that are being cited as a means of coercion to encourage parents to subject their infants, toddlers and young adults to intentional infection, heavy metal poisoning and the high risk of autism and other life long impairments, is just that: COERCION

The one size fits all approach of vaccines has produced an efficiency rate of about 34% over-all.  That means that without hand-picking an ideal group [efficacy] that could possibly respond positively to the vaccine, there is only a 34% chance the vaccine will work at all [efficiency].

Efficacy simply means that IF a selected and ideal group of candidates for the vaccine were found and isolated, the vaccine could work at least some of the time.  To find this ideal group would require extensive testing to exclude pre-existing known or unknown genetic disorders, current infections, past infections, blood work panels, and various other biological factors and medically based  information gathering. This information gathering is almost never done.

How many times has any physician done any of these tests before admonishing parents to vaccinate their child?

While harping continually on the “efficacy” of vaccines, not one of those proposing increasing the toxic load have addressed the difference between “efficacy” as opposed to “efficiency”.  Using the word [efficacy] is intentional and avoids the real issue of [efficiency].

MDH: We’ll set you up for future charges!

In their efforts to force compliance with this intentional assault on our children, the Minnesota Department of Health has responded by creating this form for parents who object to intentionally risking their children’s lifetime health with the injection of toxins in vaccines.

As is, the form is intentionally worded to imply that the parent or guardian is endangering their child(ren):

___________________________________________________

At about page 23. MDH Developed this form to have parents sign that looks like this

D.

If the parent/guardian conscientiously opposes required immunizations:

Not following vaccination recommendations may endanger the health or life of my child and others that

my child might come in contact with.

I hereby certify by notarization that:

I am opposed to all immunizations.

I am opposed to only the vaccines indicated. Vaccine(s) I oppose:

______________________________________________________

This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both.  The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination.  This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.

Here is a more relevant opt out form to use that avoids the word trap included in the proposed opt out by MDH: More