The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) decided to check out the AMA’s 96 percent claim. We recall that the “one voice” has sometimes been wrong, and the four percent right.
Many patients tell us that their doctors are pressuring them to get the COVID jab. The American Medical Association (AMA) claims that 96 percent of doctors are themselves fully vaccinated. So, if 9.6 out of 10—not a mere 4 out of 5 doctors recommend something, it must be “right for you.”
As far as I have heard, the message from state and local medical societies is “take the lead, get your shot, volunteer at a vaccination center, educate your hesitant patients.”
There is probably some person with an M.D. degree backing up your employer’s threat to fire you, or a college’s threat to deny your child an education, or some committee’s decision to deny your medical exemption. It might appear that doctors are all “speaking with one voice,” as the AMA constantly urges.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Joe Biden, Dr. Jill Biden, Klaus Schwab, executives at Pfizer and other manufacturers, and the anonymous Big Tech “fact-checkers” all want you to get the jab. More
Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death – as fraud.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result.
This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases / “infections” detected by the use of this incorrect test.
In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.
Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.
According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a serious breach of the Convention.
The “experimental” vaccine violates all 10 Nuremberg codes – which carry the death penalty for those who try to break these international laws. More
This chapter is a preliminary part of the forthcoming book “Corona Unmasked“, and it is made available by the authors for free download for private use only. To be ordered from the publisher, a bookshop or online. All rights reserved. The authors and the publisher have prepared this work with the utmost care. Nevertheless, any liability of the publisher or the authors is excluded.
Chapter 14: VACCINATION CRAZE
This is a pre-publication of a chapter that will be finalized in the forthcoming book, available April 2021
“Gene-based vaccines received emergency approval at lightning speed to combat a virus that is no more dan-gerous than influenza (34). There is now clear evidence that people can become severely ill and die from these vaccinations. No real-world benefit of vaccination has ever been shown. Until reliable and convincing data are available, this high-risk human experiment must not be allowed to continue.”
Will good things come only to those who wait?
Until now, most of the public has accepted and sup-ported the development of vaccines without doubt and hesitation. And rightly so, since vaccinations can save lives. But no vaccination will ever be perfect and free of side effects. Useful vaccines must meet two important requirements: 1. the vaccine must offer protection against a serious or even life-threatening disease; 2. its side effects must be within tolerable and acceptable limits. On balance, the benefit must be much greater than the risk. Sounds logical, doesn’t it? And it is true. Who would get vaccinated against a common cold if this meant taking an incalculable risk of severe side effects? Furthermore, not every vaccination has to be useful for every person. Living in Germany, we do not need a vaccination against yellow fever, since it does not occur here. We already know that COVID-19 puts a clearly defined group of people at risk – namely, those over 70 with serious preexisting conditions. For these people, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 might possibly make sense. Of course, before such vaccinations could begin, the vaccine‘s efficacy and potential dangers would need to be examined very carefully. However, the clinical studies conducted thus far have excluded precisely this group of patients, so that efficacy and risks remained unknown before the roll-out of the vaccine.
Does the “killer coronavirus” justify exceptions? More
On March 17, 2020, the United States Department of Health and Human Services published a decree that granted covered persons and entities liability immunity from performing countermeasures against Covid-19.
The document was published in the Federal Register under the title:
According to the publication, “The Secretary is issuing this Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19. The Declaration was effective as of February 4, 2020.”
In a nutshell, this decree grants any covered persons, companies, or entities immunity from being sued in a court of law should the products they create, administer, or otherwise use on people or patients harm said individuals. The covered entities and products would naturally include drugmakers, antiviral medicines, and of course, vaccines!
“Covered Countermeasures are any antiviral, any other drug, any biologic, any diagnostic, any other device, or any vaccine used to treat, diagnose, cure, prevent, or mitigate COVID-19, or the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or a virus mutating therefrom, or any device used in the administration of any such product, and all components and constituent materials of any such product.”
As a healthcare consumer, you have absolutely no recourse if you or a loved one is irreparably harmed from receiving medication or a future vaccine that might be rushed to market to combat the fake viral epidemic that is supposedly ravaging the planet.
The immunity from liability currently extends to October 1, 2024. There is a provision in the document that grants an additional 12 months of immunity liability beyond the October 1, 2024 date. So, I guess the immunity protection, in reality, extends to October 1, 2025.
I think a document of this nature is pretty big news. Interestingly, the publication was not covered in the mainstream media broadcasts or the daily press briefings conducted by President Trump and Dr. Fauci. Instead, the information has been buried deep within the construct of the Internet, where it’s pretty much protected from the light of day, and most importantly, everyday citizens that will ultimately be subjected to the plethora of drug and vaccine products being planned to flood the market.
It’s also interesting to note that the decree became effective on February 4, 2020. This was well before the onslaught of craziness and lockdowns that are currently taking place, began. Sure, the disease was a known entity in the world at that point, but it looks terrible that the effective date was early February, and the document was not published until the middle of March.
We are already there! any time a bill is entitled “an ACT” it is a clear signal that what congress is about to do will violate individual rights by FORCE! the ACT will violate your protections under the Constitution and will be enforced by law enforcement and agency personnel who are more than willing to participate in violating your rights. These are Americans turning on other Americans for reasons I will never understand.
Live Science is reporting that more parents are refusing to vaccinate their children now than a decade ago because they simply do not see a need for vaccination. Researchers have found that in 2013, 87 percent of pediatricians surveyed said they encountered vaccine refusals from parents of their patients, up from 75 percent of pediatricians who said the same in 2006.
Intelligent parents who refused to vaccinate their kids understand how unnecessary and dangerous vaccines are and such parents see the payoff, their kids tend to remain healthier with less colds and infections. Vaccine-preventable diseases are rare these days and many of them started to disappear before vaccines where created for each specific disease.
Live Science is biased when it comes to vaccines so it is not surprising that they say that many parents delay vaccination out of the mistaken belief that vaccines may burden children’s immune systems. There is no mistake about it. Vaccines do reduce natural immunity and can clobber the immune system causing death or many chronic diseases.
Zika: the ideal fake epidemic to stir “need” for airborne vaccination: “we must do something to stop the spread of the virus”
No need to mandate shots: release mosquitoes to deliver them
by Jon Rappoport
February 8, 2016
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)
People are discussing whether genetically engineered mosquitoes could have spread Zika, the virus that causes nothing. Rather, look to the future, when such biting mosquitoes could deliver flying vaccinations against the virus that causes nothing.
In previous articles, I’ve established that the connection between the Zika virus and cases of birth defects in Brazil is entirely and utterly unproven. It is hype, not science.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), whose by line includes the statement “Dedicated to the Health of All Children”, might possibly want to revise that statement of intent.
After reviewing their “Refuses Vaccinations” form that is now being handed out to those of us who perceive vaccinations as a threat to public health, I can only conclude that the AAP is so far into bed with the pharmaceutical companies and manufactured for-profit vaccines, that they are essentially sharing the same monetary pillow.
The form they have devised very carefully takes the known risks of vaccines, the resulting damage to overall health and the risk of possible death, and converts those risks to refusing vaccines.
Lets take a look at what they claim could be the result of refusing vaccinations:
.That some vaccine-preventable diseases are common in other countries and that my unvaccinated child could easily get one of these diseases while traveling or from a traveler.
Even with vaccination your child or you, could contract a disease from another country. What you will contract is the wild virus relative to that region, not the mutated form of the virus presented in the vaccine. Vaccine mutated viruses are 2-3 times more lethal than wild viruses as was documented in the spread of vaccine induced polio in India. We saw the same deadly effects in Nigeria. More
The battle over vaccinations is heating up as more information, much of it previously hidden from the public, finds it way into the public eye. Spurred by the massive rise in autism, neurological disorders, behavioral disorders and a host of physical symptoms and impairment’s in correlation with the administration of vaccines, parents have become increasingly wary of allowing vaccination of their infants and toddlers.
The elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about is the rise of infectious diseases in vaccinated populations. The vaccines, we are told, are [thought] to prevent these diseases. They [think] they will prevent disease.
Not one manufacturer has proven conclusively, or can produce any concrete evidence that they do.
How successful can a vaccine actually be if hundreds if not thousands die from the vaccine or are permanently injured from it?
If the vaccine causes at least as many deaths as the disease itself causes, what is the point of vaccinating?
If it also creates lifetime impairment’s that are as bad and most times worse than those that would have occurred from the disease…….what have we actually accomplished?
And, if vaccines actually do provide immunity, why are booster’s needed even into adulthood in many cases?
If we interfere with the natural courses of disease, have we not prevented the very herd immunity big pharma claims is created with vaccines?
At what point did we decide that there was to be an accepted or anticipated level of death associated with vaccines or any medication for that matter? And why would any one continue to insist on harmful vaccines when obviously the vaccinated individual can still contract the disease?
The difference between efficacy and efficiency More
Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved
______________________________________________
“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks. In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”. [pp.167-169] Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931 “
______________________________________________
As far back as the late 1800’s, maybe even earlier, has been a concerted effort by collections of individuals who somehow view themselves as superior to the general population to institute eugenics; a system of controlled breeding of those they viewed as inferior. The American Eugenics Society formed the blueprint for what was later used in Nazi Germany to systematically purge Europe of those they found undesirable based on race, intellectual capacity, infirmities, social rejections, physical traits and even age. We’ve come a long way, baby.
Eugenics has been transformed, re-created, re-packaged and has a shiny new image signified by the systematic poisoning of the world’s populations through the use of chemicals, vaccines, lethal medications, chemtrails and efforts to genetically alter food to achieve a soft kill. In order to make this selective genetic machine operate efficiently, global efforts are being implemented to collect the DNA of every human being on earth. It is our DNA that must be altered, rendered inefficient and damaged, allowing the manipulation and exploitation coveted by the scientific industrialists.
“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks. In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”. [pp.167-169] Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931
Is this not where we are now? The food in our stores is irradiated, contaminated with gmo’s, loaded with chemicals, preservatives, dyes, residual pesticides, herbicides, residual vaccines, hormones, antibiotics and foods created from combining the genes of unrelated species and from cloning. Our food supply, so infected with toxins of all kinds produced for no other reason than to manipulate ownership of the food supply for profit by bio-pirates, now presents a threat to the health of human beings and poses immediate danger to the environment. More
Will someone please shut off the lights and close the door on Wisconsin? If their legislators aren’t trying to figure out ways to harass and torment the agricultural sector, Herb Kohl keeps them busy trying to find ways to sell the whole state off to corporations. Now comes this:
Rep. Tammy Baldwin, believes that children should declare their sexual orientation if they access public education, or any of the vaccination programs or other activites provided by “public education”. All of those programs on vaccines alone are enough to pull your kids out of public schools. It is no one’s business what the sexual orientation of another person is, was or might be. It is surely none of the school’s business. School is for education, not for singling out those who might be different. Maybe if we concentrated on actually educating the children rather than poking our government noses into something we have no business in, we might get kids graduating who could actually make change for a dollar and read beyond a 5th grade level! More
“The organiser, Christine Lord, lost her only son Andy Black, to vCJD when he was only 24. He didn’t eat beef or have a blood transfusion so she thinks his vCJD occured from eating school meals with mechanically recovered meat in them or through the vaccinations he had as a child. Interestingly, all of his vaccine records from the age of five, disappeared, as did the records of many other victims.”
The government has recorded 168 deaths due to variant CJD – caught from infected bovine material – but this figure is contested as being inaccurate because many of the families who have lost a loved one to this devastating brain disease say that they were never recorded in the official statistics. More
We believe in the rights to life, liberty, and personal security for ourselves and our children.
We demand the universal human rights standard of informed consent for all medical interventions. Compulsory vaccination cannot be legally and morally justified.
We affirm
the sanctity of personal space,
the right to be left alone, and
the freedom to make personal health care decisions guided by the professionals of our choosing.
We invite all people, families and organizations committed to protecting these fundamental rights to stand with us in downtown Chicago on May 26, 2010 at our inaugural rally, and to work with us after the rally to support grassroots advocacy, education, and leadership in defense of our personal – individual, legal, moral, religious, civil, and human— rights.
The above exerpt from from Dr. Lanctot is evidence that we are all expendable when it comes to the for-profit pharmaceutical and medical world.
The Medical Mafia by Guylaine Lanctot, M.D.
The Trial of The Medical Mafia ($15 Canada, $12 USA)—Joachim Schafer ISBN 2921783 029 An account of the hearing before the Quebec College of Physicians Publisher: Here the Key, PO Box 309, Waterloo, QCJOE 2NO, Canada. Tel: (450) 297 2533 Fax: (450) 297 4140
Please watch this news clip from Massachusetts about a bill designed to force people to comply with any and all instructions from emergency health care personnel including taking the vaccine, or face a $1000 per day penalty and/or jail time, and check your own state’s laws HERE. Then read the excellent expose by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regarding the Thimersol cover-up. READ MORE…
“This doesn’t appear to be an especially deadly strain,” said Deborah Lehman, Director of Pediatric Infectious Disease at Cedars Sinai hospital in Los Angeles. “At this point it looks like the seasonal flu will be responsible for more deaths than swine flu.”
The Internet has been burning up for months with this question: Will there be forced vaccinations for the H1N1 ‘swine flu’? The WHO (World Health Organization) has been making splashy headlines about a “coming pandemic” that will dwarf anything seen in the history of the world! Who gives a tinker’s damn what the WHO says? The big shots in the WHO with a banana republic mentality, actually think they have the authority to dissolve sovereign governments over a pandemic! These little Napoleons also label anyone who refuses a vaccine as criminals; see here.
There are three questions that everyone must consider:
1. Is a vaccine necessary for this so called swine flu?
2. Is a vaccine that is already being used for this H1N1 flu safe?
3. Does the federal or your state government have a legal right under the U.S. Constitution to sic their dragoons on any American who refuses a flu vaccine?
My recent article on refusing vaccinations elicited many comments from people all over the world. My article claimed the WHO had claimed the authority to dissolve governments and of course, the naysayers crawled out of the woodwork saying this was not true. I will be posting an article this evening expanding on this claim, showing how and where the WHO claims to have this authority. In the meantime, watch these videos’ which will clarify more fully the WHO’s claim to be able in a health “crisis” to take emergency government control, commandeering police among other entities to establish a government run by the United Nations via the WHO. Marti
The Obama administration is quietly dusting off an effort to impose new federal quarantine regulations, which were vigorously resisted by civil liberties organizations and the airline industry when the rules were first proposed by the Bush administration nearly four years ago.
White House officials aren’t saying what their rules might ultimately require. But the previous administration proposed giving the federal government the authority to order a “provisional quarantine” of three business days — or up to six calendar days — for those suspected of having swine flu or other illnesses listed in a presidential executive order.
Have I stressed strongly enough that we need to STORE FOOD?
Go to my Surviving the Middle Class Crash site HERE to learn the basics about food storage. While you are there, peruse the site to gain all sorts of tips regarding growing your own food and making the transition to self-sufficiency. If you have any questions, contact me from the site and I will do my best to locate the information if I do not have it already.
Tetrahedron, LLC Health Science Communications for People Around the World
SPECIAL REPORT
Release: No. CIA-1
Date Mailed: July 17, 2009 For Immediate Release
Contact: Jackie Lindenbach–(208) 265-8065
A Conspiracy Reality Underlies the Swine Flu Black Op
Los Angeles–CIA assassinations and paramilitary operations secreted from congressional overseers and the American people have extended into the realm of swine flu bioterrorism and vaccinations for profitable depopulation according to medical journalist and CIA analyst, Dr. Leonard Horowitz.
The CIA spent years advancing secret squads to blow things up and kill humans according to U.S. intelligence officials interviewed by Greg Miller of the Los Angeles Times. (July 16, 2009) What the Times failed to report was current connections between drug industrialists and CIA officials that best explain the mysterious emergence of the swine flu virus in Mexico, and the international media’s curious response to the planned pandemic, according to Dr. Horowitz–a Harvard-trained investigator and award-winning author of several books on this subject.
Current and former U.S. intelligence officials disclosed a broader effort than media coverage has portrayed, including black-ops about which congressional oversight committees and Americans knew nothing, the Times published. More
Anyone who has read a newspaper, listened to the radio, gone on the internet or watched the evening news on TV over the last week or so, might believe that there is a real possibility that millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of other people throughout the world could be wiped out by a new deadly swine flu virus that is sweeping across the globe. The worldwide media has been turning out countless numbers of stories and producing hundreds of TV special reports about the possibility of a swine flu pandemic, complete with on-site videos with people wearing face masks, colorful graphics and interviews with scores of medical experts-for-hire. But is all this news coverage based on a genuine concern for the health and safety of the people, or is it just media hype designed to sell newspapers, TV advertising, anti-flu medicines and vaccines?
On May 1, 2009, The World Health Organization reported only 331 cases of swine flu worldwide (outside of Mexico), but still declared the crisis to be at level 5 alert on a scale of 6, meaning that this strain of flu might be considered an all-out pandemic if the numbers keep rising. On the same date, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that there were 109 cases in the U.S., with several states possibly confirming an additional 22 cases. Do these numbers indicate that a national crisis is at hand?
Let’s put these numbers in perspective: According to the Centers for Disease Control, 36,000 Americans die each year (almost 100 a day) from various forms of the flu virus, yet it is not considered a pandemic or a crisis. Worldwide, Malaria kills 3,000 people every day, but the World Health Organization only considers it “a health problem” and not a pandemic. Of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a very short time period when governments and individuals order millions of doses of vaccines and medications in response to a threat of a new flu pandemic.
Back in 1976, when the Swine Flu last hit America, the Ford Administration tried to use the fear of a pandemic to force 220 million Americans to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations. In a very short period of time, the pharmaceutical industry made $135 million on their vaccines, which had been given to nearly 40 million Americans before the accumulation of fatalities and crippling side effects caused the program to be stopped. When the questionable “pandemic threat” was over, only one person in America had died from the Swine flu, but 25 other Americans had died from the vaccine. By the way, the pharmaceutical companies managed to protect themselves from lawsuits by pre-arranging for the government to assume any liabilities in case there was a problem with the vaccines.
More recently, in 2006, there was another worldwide pandemic threat called the Avian flu. The same type of videos and stories appeared throughout the media. ABC News even pushed the possibility of a pending worldwide apocalypse to the public by featuring a doctor-for-hire who predicted “that 50% of the population of the world could die” because of the Avian flu. Of course that never happened. Although the death of any person is a tragedy, only 257 people in the entire world died from the Avian flu. That’s 257 people out of 6.5 billion. It could hardly be considered a pandemic or a worldwide health threat. Because of the Avian Flu scare, the Bush Administration purchased and stockpiled millions of doses of anti-flu drugs in case of a future pandemic. Back then, some people thought that the threat of the Avian flu pandemic was cleverly created, manipulated and designed to frighten the American people, in order to line the pockets of politically connected investors and pharmaceutical companies.
If the profit motive is not part of the reason for the current hype and the threat to the American people is real, then why has our government not taken the overt actions necessary to protect its own citizens? With almost 2,000 official swine flu cases originating in Mexico, most European and Asian countries, including China, have closed their airports to flights from Mexico in order to protect their citizens. Our government has taken no such steps to protect its citizens against this threat and our borders remain wide open with no restrictions or limitations on Mexicans entering the United States.
The Department of Homeland Security advised that they are on top of the situation and are watching people entering the U.S. for signs of illness. On the surface it sounds like the government is at least doing something, until you read the April 27 Reuters report on what is really happening at the border and that “Mexicans are continuing to (illegally) cross the border by car and foot, seemingly unconcerned by the influenza scare and only a handful are wearing masks.” The failure to secure the border in a time of emergency in order to protect the health and welfare of American citizens is a sign that this administration has chosen political correctness over the safety of its own citizens. It’s sad to say, but I don’t believe a Republican administration would take the necessary steps either.
I am sure that by mid-May the whole Swine Flu scare will be over and the hype will have died down. The American borders will remain wide open for illegal immigrants and terrorists to enter the country; the pharmaceutical companies will have made billions; the media companies will have made hundreds of millions from pharmaceutical company advertising and the administration will take credit for a job well done.
Thank God it wasn’t a real emergency!
_______________________________________
John Wallace “For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty” New York Campaign for Liberty
Chatham, New York http://www.NYCampaignForLiberty.com
Dr. Ott does a 12 part series each part lasting approximately ten minutes on Vaccines, bird flu, fema camps and more. This will probably be one of the most informative videos you will ever see. We have included # 1, #4, #8 and # 12 here. This is just a sampling of the vast amount of information available in these videos. You can access the remaining sections on YouTube.
In September, the USDA issued a memo to animal health officials that mandated NAIS premises registration be used any time someone had any activity on their property (such as vaccinations or testing) conducted under any of the federal disease control programs. We publicized the memo in November, and a public outcry ensued. The September 22 memo is posted here.
On December 22, USDA issued a new memo posted here, that revoked its September memo. The fact that USDA felt pressured to take this step is good news! But the new memo is far from being a complete victory.
On the last two pages of the new memo, USDA still provides for mandatory premises registration any time Veterinary Services personnel conduct an “activity” related to a federal disease control program, including such activities as vaccinations, certification, or surveillance. Moreover, accredited veterinarians are still expected to provide information on their clients to the government authorities to enable the voluntary or involuntary issuance of the NAIS registration. At the very end of the document, USDA includes language indicating that a property owner might elect not to have a NAIS PIN assigned to the premises, but does not explain how that fits with the directives in the memo that “all locations” that have a disease program activity “will be identified” with a NAIS PIN.” The ultimate effect is very unclear.
So, what is the difference between the two memos? The primary difference is that the new memo is more ambiguous. We’ve seen this before: in the original NAIS documents, USDA had a clear list of reportable events. By late 2007, USDA had vague categories such as “local” versus “regional,” and “high priority” versus “low priority,” to determine what co-mingling events were reportable. So apparently this is USDA’s mode of operation. It puts out documents with clear provisions, and then responds to citizen protests by cloaking the next document in ambiguity, without making significant substantive changes.
The substance of this new memo is very similar to the earlier memo, including mandatory registration of citizens’ property. The main improvement appears to be that people who choose not to be registered in NAIS will not be branded with a special code in the premises database, labeling them as dissenters.
In the new memo, USDA tries to add a feel-good aspect when it re-iterates that it has a procedure for people to opt out. However, if any “activity” for a disease program has occurred on the property, the property address will remain in the NAIS database.
In other words, the new memo appears to establish the following procedure:
1. If an animal health official or a federally accredited veterinarian conducts any activity (including vaccinations and certifications) under a federal disease control program (which includes brucellosis, tuberculosis, scrapie, pseudorabies, and equine infectious anemia), your information will be submitted to the agency and your property will be registered in the NAIS database.
2. If you then ask to opt out, your personal information will be deleted, but the address of your property will remain in the database with the assigned PIN number since a “program activity” is associated with it.
The language of the memo leaves a lot of unanswered questions, including what is the role of the state authorities. USDA states that “when the State or producer, or person responsible, for the premises elects not to have a standardized PIN assigned to the premises,” a state PIN will be issued. But is this only after the property is assigned a NAIS number and its owner seeks to opt out? And will the state authorities check if the registration is voluntary or not before sending people’s information to the USDA to be placed in the NAIS database? And what “events” or “activities” will prevent people from being able to opt out and use a state PIN? The memo leaves more questions than it answers…
P.S. One of the most important videos we’ve posted in a long time.
The interview is nine months old, but few saw it and then the issue “disappeared.”
If you don’t tell you friends and colleagues, no one else is likely to do it.
This is one tragedy you can stop.
Mercury in vaccines causes autism
Children of the current generation receive 24 mandatory vaccinations. A generation ago, only 10 were required.
Through vaccinations, children receive 400x the amount of mercury deemed safe by the FDA.
The Hep B routinely given to newborns contains so much mercury preservative that it would normally only be considered safe under standard medical guidelines to give to a 275 pound adult.
Why is this going on?
Politics and corruption.
In the White House, in Congress, in the FDA, in the medical establishment, and in the pharmaceutical industry.
Simple guidelines:
1. Never bring your child to be immunized if he or she is already ill
2. Do not allow the doctor to load your child up on multiple immunizations on a single visit just because it is more convenient for him, the doctor.
3. Avoid all unnecessary vaccinations. Make the doctor explain to you in detail the justification for every single one she recommends. They research it before you go ahead.
4. If you feel you must comply, delay them as long as possible to give your child time to grow.
Gardasil, a vaccine promoted as protection against various types of cervical cancer supposedly caused by the HP virus, obviously is intended for other purposes. Even with the number of deaths and injury from the vaccine the ads still run non-stop on TV while state and federal governments try to find ever newer and more invasive ways of making mandatory vaccination a reality.
Merck, known for its lacing of Hepatitis B vaccines with HIV, and injecting that vaccine into unsuspecting men who had no idea that they had been marked for death, seems to have no compunction about producing lethal cocktails of drugs and vaccines to test on an unsuspecting public. And our government pays them to do it.
States such as Texas whose legislature voted down a bill to make the vaccine mandatory, was usurped by the governor from hell, Rick Perry. Perry, who busies himself finding ways to implement the Security & Prosperity Partnership and who fully supports the North American Union, took a cue from his idol and mentor, George W. Bush. Perry simply took it upon himself to issue an executive order overriding the legislature, and made the vaccination of young girls mandatory in Texas.
But here’s a glimmer of hope for the Rick Perry’s out there; the most important new opportunity for the vaccine will be for its use in males. (Merck claims: The vaccine could help prevent males from contracting Human Papilloma virus and spreading it to females through sexual contact.) Merck is on track to seek approval for use in males by the end of 2008. Bingo! and now we will render our boys sterile also! And how many of their deaths and other injuries will go under-reported while MERCK profits?
Gardasil contains extremely high levels of polysorbate 80, a known cause of sterility in lab tests on mice, and also known to cause sterility in humans. High levels of other neurotoxic chemicals and the presence of thimerisol, a derivitive of mercury is also present although MERCK had denied that the vaccine contained either.
It will most likely be ten years or more before an estimated death toll is revealed. Even then, what the public will hear will be the watered down, diluted version of the damage caused by Gardasil. And, thanks to the new Vaccine Liability Fund, funded in whole by US taxpayers, MERCK will never be held responsible or liable for the deaths and injuries they have caused and instead will simply add up the billions in profits while taxpayers foot the bill.
Cynthia Janek wrote an article for the New American called “FDA and HPV….when did they know?….(follow up). Janek’s research revealed”
” …the FDA knew back in 2003 that a HPV is not the actual cause of cervical cancer. The actual cause is a ‘persistent HPV infection that may act as a tumor promoter in cancer induction.'”
“What we have here is proof that there is scientific evidence that has been published in the past 15 years that states that HPV infection does not bear a direct relationship to the forming of cervical cancer. It also tells us that HPV, if allowed to will be taken care of by our own body’s natural processes. . .“most infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer.” With this being said, why do we need Gardasil when our own body is more than capable of eradicating HPV? What we need is a government policy to assist women with the cost of getting follow-up tests when persistent HPV infection is present. This would make more sense and our government would save so much money on these types of programs instead of $360 each for the Gardasil vaccination.”
The Harper government in Canada is now actively trying to implement a country wide mandatory vaccination of young girls using Gardasil. Harper, another promoter of the North American Union, is working in tandem with the US government in efforts to sterilize as many girls as possible in an effort to facilitate population reduction. There can be no other reason. Why else would these governments be actively pushing this vaccination that has been exposed as a fraud unless there were some underlying intent? And what other intent could there be, if not sterilization of our young women so they can no longer reproduce?
Now, MERCK has applied to the FDA for approval of the vaccine to be used on older women. As MERCK can produce not one independent test trial that proves the link between HPV and cervical cancer, and has even less evidence that Gardasil in fact will prevent any form of cervical cancer, one might think the FDA would have no hesitation in denying access to the market for this lethal vaccine. Oh! We could only dream! The FDA, noted for its funding by the same companies who seek their approval, is dragging its feet, but approval of the extended vaccine is slated for the end of 2008.
As the FDA also states with regards to many pharmaceuticals, death is an acceptable side affect. Acceptable to whom? MERCK? When the male version of the vaccine arrives on the market, I believe Gov. Perry, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and PM Harper should all be injected first, then all the people at MERCK and followed by everyone at the FDA. We should vaccinate all their children too…….we don’t need successive generations of genocidal monsters.
Forum Germ Warfare and Contagious Diseases
Constitution Project
Stanford University, Constitutional Law Center
Washington, District of Columbia (United States) ID: 204834 – 04/11/2008 – 2:56 – $29.95
Coordinator (1998-2003), National Security Council, Infrastructure Protection & Counterterrorism
Karlan, Pamela C.
Professor, Stanford University, Law School
Greenberger, Michael
Director, University of Maryland, College Park, Center for Health & Homeland Security
Cetron, Martin
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Global Migration & Quarantine Div.
Chertoff, Michael
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Chyba, Christopher F.
Professor, Princeton University, International Affairs
Runge, Jeffrey W. M.D.
Chief Medical Officer, Department of Homeland Security
Sullivan, Kathleen M.
Founding Director, Stanford University, Constitutional Law Center
Hamburg, Margaret A. “Peggy” M.D.
Senior Scientist, Nuclear Threat Initiative
A panel discussion was held by legal, scientific, and counterterrorism experts on whether certain responses to a major epidemic or biowarfare incident such as forced inoculation, isolation, and quarantines would result in legal challenges, and what responses are consistent with the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Margaret Hamburg made opening remarks. Kathleen Sullivan moderated.
The panel was followed by a keynote address from Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.
This “Conference to Address Constitutional Implications of Responses to Germ Warfare and Contagious Disease” was held in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
This broadcast on CSPAN2 Was one of those preparatory events that always preceed a national crisis that will be created. These forums are used to implant acceptance of loss of rights and the coming devastation that is planned…..of course it wil be some vague personage from “over there” who will cause the crisis. Nevermind that the US is the greatest producer and seller of biological and germ warfare weaponry.
If you are a parent or if you have young children you need to read, print or download Rep Dan Burton’sreport on mercury in vaccines and its link to autism! This is Rep. Dan Burton’s Letter to Special Masters on Study Showing Mercury Link to Autism-11/29/07
Click On Link Below To Read, Print or Download
Congressman Dan Burton’s letter with study.
Please watch this news clip from Massachusetts about a bill designed to force people to comply with any and all instructions from emergency health care personnel including taking the vaccine, or face a $1000 per day penalty and/or jail time, and check your own state’s laws 
By: Devvy
Josh Gerstein
