Home

FAREWELL TO THE GOLDEN STATE?

1 Comment

Author, Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Though fear, the coronavirus is clearly being used in California to further a long term goal which is held by certain members of the politically correct Marxist elite, and the agenda is sadly meant to destroy basic freedoms, along with the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights which was meant to protect the common people from past instances of government tyranny which had been very present in so many countries through the ages.  I’m not saying we should be stupid and not careful but we must always be aware of government encroachment upon our basic liberties and if not, we will become just like Red China in the twinkling of an eye.

Governor Newsom just declared that he has the “power” to declare martial law “if necessary.”  This poses the question.  Why would this option be on  the table when “law abiding, tax paying citizens” are mainly interested in helping themselves and one another by preventing the spread of a virus?
If there are persons or gangs out there that aim to break into stores or malls and either create damage or steal, are these people also Americans
or are they aliens who were allowed to cross the Southern border during the Obama years and even later?  Even so, the Governor deems that it would
be “necessary” to call in the National Guard as back up and use guns upon a mostly unarmed people if necessary?  But did he ever suggest that the
Southern border be closed?  At least Mexico closed their side.

One may ask, is not the sheriff of a county and the city police enough law enforcement to contain civil unrest?  City and county law enforcement
agencies were given, during the Obama years, plenty of military grad weapons to deal with events, & even grenade launchers, that demanded more
fire power. This would include SWAT Teams that are ready in various counties, to respond at a minutes notice to unlawful acts.  Yet, if the people do not pose a threat and they are only interested in taking care of their own health and others, why is one of the munition factories which I am familiar with already making more munitions right now for law enforcement agencies which may be called upon for possibly a fabricated marital law event?  And the coronavirus will become the catalyst to accelerate a New World Order agenda?  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to conclude that California is one such government that has been looking a long time for a reason to bring about a martial law event that would, in addition, greatly infringe upon one’s rights with regard to the 2nd amendment and the right to bear arms.

Since the Governor of California has now taken the state to the edge of the abyss, will a freedom loving people just stand by and allow another Kent State debacle, such as the 1970 event where unarmed students were mowed down by the Ohio National Guard? That massacre resulted in 4 dead students and 9 which were wounded when they were protesting.

“We the people” can no longer just look the other way when it comes to the basic freedoms which had been given to us after the end of the American Revolution while liberty and justice for all is now vanishing at light speed.  Abraham Lincoln warned us about tyranny in his speech back
in 1858 which related to the spirit of America’s freedom.

“Destroy this spirit and you have planted the seeds of despotism at your own doors…Trample on the rights of others, you have lost the genius of your own independence and become the fit subjects of the first cunning tyrant who rises among you.” Edwardsville, Illinois, 9/11/1858.  President Abraham Lincoln of Liberty

21 Trillion missing from US Government…no Accounting for it

Leave a comment

One comment that deserves special attention from one of our members:
LouieC……
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The question to ask all those running for public office:
$21 Trillion dollars is missing from the US government. That is $65,000 per person – as much as the national debt!
“No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.” ~ Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, U.S. Constitution
What’s going on? Where is the money? How could this happen? How much has really gone missing? What would happen if a corporation failed to pass an audit like this? Or a taxpayer?
This means the Fed and their member banks are transacting government money outside the law. So are the corporate contractors that run the payment systems. So are the Wall Street firms who are selling government securities without full disclosure. Would your banks continue to handle your bank account if you behaved like this? Would your investors continue to buy your securities if you behaved like this? Would your accountant be silent?
This is the reason that there is such a strong push to change or tear up the US Constitution. This is why members of the establishment say it is “old,” “outdated!” This is why there is such a push for gun control. Don’t buy it! We can use the Constitution to get our money and our government back. It is time to enforce the US Constitution.
The Solari Report has been covering the missing money since 2000 when Catherine Austin Fitts began to to warn Americans and global investors about mortgage fraud at the US Department of Housing and Development (HUD), the engineering of the housing bubble that lead to trillions more dollars in bailouts and funds missing from the US government starting in fiscal 1998.
Video Player

HIGH TREASON IN HIGH PLACES

2 Comments

new-logo25Author, Chuck Frank

Forget conspiracy, we’ve now got the facts.  Without a doubt, key players and insiders of the Democratic Party, along with other splinter groups are guilty of going under the radar and orchestrating a number of inside jobs that are horribly treasonous beyond measure,  and even to the likes of the American General, Benedict Arnold who conspired with England in a treasonous plot during the American Revolution.

Similarly, there is a mission today to deliberately sabotage the American political process in a high handed fashion, but it doesn’t stop there.  The rigging of computer chips in voting machines and bringing in ineligible voters by rogue party saboteurs has now been confirmed by James O’Keefe in his bombshell video which reveals demo/party plants that are meant to cause chaos and  violence at rallies and also at numerous voting locations.  It is a top down job
coming from on high, and if it is allowed to continue during the election, a free country and a government for and by the people, could easily lapse into a very faint memory, and when the books are finally opened years later, will the reader ask the question, why didn’t the people do something to stop the rampant crime and the oncoming dictatorship?

How many instances of voter fraud, Benghazi style events and executive Presidential orders does it have to take before a person watches the last stone finally put into place while the U.S.
Constitution is shredded into a thousand pieces and a dictatorship is formed? 

Folks, it is D Day and we are in a final battle for our country and those God-given rights that belong to the people.  

I recollect that there was a similar battle being considered one day over 200 years ago on March 13, 1775.  It was in a packed-out St. John’s Church, in the state of Virginia, where there was a man concerned with the loss of individual liberties because of the heavy hand of the English.  He then fervently shared the following statement while George Washington and Thomas Jefferson sat in awed silence at this historical gathering.  

 “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains, and slavery?  Forbid it, Almighty God!  I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” Patrick Henry , 1775

All Our Children Are Now FBI Terrorism Suspects

2 Comments

Maybe we should report the FBI for domestic terrorism activities.

Sheep Led to the Slaughter: The Muzzling of Free Speech in America

4 Comments

John W. Whitehead

September 01, 2015

“If the freedom of speech be taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”—George Washington

The architects of the American police state must think we’re idiots.

With every passing day, we’re being moved further down the road towards a totalitarian society characterized by government censorship, violence, corruption, hypocrisy and intolerance, all packaged for our supposed benefit in the Orwellian doublespeak of national security, tolerance and so-called “government speech.”

Long gone are the days when advocates of free speech could prevail in a case such as Tinker v. Des Moines. Indeed, it’s been 50 years since 13-year-old Mary Beth Tinker was suspended for wearing a black armband to school in protest of the Vietnam War. In taking up her case, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

Were Tinker to make its way through the courts today, it would have to overcome the many hurdles being placed in the path of those attempting to voice sentiments that may be construed as unpopular, offensive, conspiratorial, violent, threatening or anti-government.

Consider, if you will, that the U.S. Supreme Court, historically a champion of the First Amendment, has declared that citizens can exercise their right to free speech everywhere it’s lawful—online, in social media, on a public sidewalk, etc.—as long as they don’t do so in front of the Court itself.

What is the rationale for upholding this ban on expressive activity on the Supreme Court plaza?

“Allowing demonstrations directed at the Court, on the Court’s own front terrace, would tend to yield the…impression…of a Court engaged with — and potentially vulnerable to — outside entreaties by the public.”

Translation: The appellate court that issued that particular ruling in Hodge v. Talkin actually wants us to believe that the Court is so impressionable that the justices could be swayed by the sight of a single man, civil rights activist Harold Hodge, standing alone and silent in the snow in a 20,000 square-foot space in front of the Supreme Court building wearing a small sign protesting the toll the police state is taking on the lives of black and Hispanic Americans.

My friends, we’re being played for fools. More

Another attack on the Second Amendment: UN Small Arms Treaty

36 Comments

Marti Oakley        ©    Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

___________________________________________________________

The United Nations, that bastion of self-enriching, bloated gas bags, will soon be holding a month long convention on the UN Small Arms TREATY between 192 nations. Of course, Hillary Clinton is right in the middle of things in an effort to commit the US to this unconstitutional treaty.

Because this is a treaty, and not one of those federal corporate contract agreements the presidents are so fond of, it will have to be brought to the states for ratification (See U.S. Const. art. II, § . Section 3 provides the power to make treaties (with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate)) except I don’t believe that will ever happen.  Some, never heard of before, political slight of hand will be given as the reason as to why ratification of the treaty by the states was by-passed

Clinton will agree to the treaty on behalf of the US and Obama will sign it with great pleasure.  For decades it has been the intent of the federal government to disarm lawful gun owners in the US.. Every possible excuse and reason has been used to try and sell the idea of striking down the 2nd Amendment by both partys.  The actual intent is, by U.N. mandate to disarm private individual gun owners in America claiming a global treaty banning the ownership of small arms.  Its all for world peace!  It will make the military assaults on all nations far easier if the general population isn’t armed and able to mount even a limited defense.

Don’t look to the District of Criminals for help!

If you think other than a few Republicans and even fewer Democrats will half-heartedly object or stand to defend our constitution or our inalienable rights of any kind, much less the right to keep and bear arms, you are sadly mistaken.  Both partys have been equally active in their assaults on the constitution, with members of both partys actively promoting the militarization of local law enforcement against their respective communities.  Our police and many sheriffs departments are now para-military organizations capable and willing to turn on their own communities in subservience to Homeland Security edicts and orders.  Regarding this, the District of Criminals couldn’t be happier. More

The Chief Executive has just declared: Congress is irrelevant

30 Comments

Marti Oakley /copyright 2012

___________________________________________________

The latest assault on the American public and formerly free states of the United States of America, has been launched. Obama constructed and issued the Executive Order referred to as National Defense Resources Preparedness. Under this Order, [National Defense] is clearly laid out. It is clear that the federal government, all of its unlawful agencies, agents, private corporations operating in fraud as “public service” agencies, our military, all of our resources, our labor, our skills, energy, commerce, production, agriculture etc., are now focused on defending the federal government……..from us.

This order is the fulfillment of Obama’s “We can’t wait” strategy wherein Obama openly declared his intention to by-pass congress (essentially informing them they were no longer needed) and to enact tyrannical and dictatorial mandates by circumventing congress and enlarging the powers and enforcement capabilites of unlawfully constructed federal corporations owned by the parent corporation: The United States a.k.a. The United States of America.

In reference to this Order, Obama, just as Bush2 did, and every president going back to Lincoln, referred to himself as the Chief Executive as in “corporate executive”, not as the elected President of the United States. As a mere president, he is only empowered to enforce the law. But as the Chief Executive of the Corporation, he can hire and fire (he essentially just fired all of congress) change the rules and regulations and use Executive Orders to write laws all by himself.

We can’t wait either, Mr. Obama More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: