Home

Extra, Extra, Read All About It

Leave a comment

  new-logo251_002Author, Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

locomotive1

Why is it so hard to find the truth today?  It is because the mainstream media has been controlled by major corporate players for years and years.  Day by day their reports are loaded with deception which is so massive that a locomotive barreling down the track is losing steam because it can barely pull the load.  More

THE GLOBALISTS & THE UN’S HIDDEN AGENDA: THEIR UP AND COMING WORLDWIDE PRESENCE

5 Comments

new-logo25  Author, Chuck  Frank

______________________________________________________

Although,  there were a few UN goals at this September’s General Assembly Summit in New York that struck a lost chord but rang somewhat clear, I still did not hear the “ring” of the “liberty bell.” But that’s all well and good when it comes to globalism and the “good the whole” and especially so when it is no longer important to protect natural rights and individual freedoms.  What is strongly evident here is an international encroachment upon basic human unalienable rights, whereby total control is administered by the nationalistic demigods. Shall we invite North Korea and company to the party with a few other totalitarian states?

At the UN roundup, 196 countries voted in favor of going forward with 17 “major goals” and a UN worldwide agenda, which includes controlling CO2 levels to prevent the earth’s temperatures from rising.  But scientists are NOT addressing the potential of future natural climatic factors that would cause a true warming trend where the sun gets unusually hot. That would very well cloud the CO2 statistics while the people of the world would still be paying trillions in taxes to cool a planet that cannot be cooled whether CO2 levels are targeted or not.

Here’s a recap and more of what went on at the UN gathering. General Assembly President Mogens Lykketoft called the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development “ambitious” in confronting the injustices of poverty, marginalization and discrimination.  “We recognize the need to reduce inequalities and to protect our common home by changing unsustainable patterns of consumption and production. And, we identify the overwhelming need to address the politics of division, corruption and irresponsibility that fuel conflict and hold back development.” More

UC Davis Professor Darrell Hamamoto: Freedom Fighter Under Fire

2 Comments

new logoChuck Frank
lightofthenation.us

On Monday, the 6th of April, I had the pleasure of taking an afternoon stroll with Doctor Darrell Hamamoto on the UC Davis campus. He is a soft spoken professor that is presently under fire with UC Davis administrators who are not too happy with Agent 007, who investigates government and corporate corruption to the 10th degree.

Darrell's photo1The professor exposes behind the scenes sinister elements within America, and also includes other nations which are being catapulted into an unconstitutional Brave New World Order system fueled by a
European and American unelected, billionaire shadow elite.

Presently, UC Davis administrators along with Janet Napolitano who is the President of the University of California system, are not taking the matter lightly and have called for hearings which are already in process. However, Doctor Hamamoto is not alone in this battle and he has enlisted the renown attorney, Dan Siegal, who has defended other professors within the university system.

More

Polio-Causing Oral Polio Vaccines vs. the Cheap Vitamin C Cure

Leave a comment

strip banner

new-logo25 Cassandra Anderson

____________________________________________________

 

Attacks against vaccine workers administering the oral polio vaccine (OPV) are on the rise in Pakistan and 30 workers have been killed over the past 2 years by villagers who are suspicious of the vaccines.

 

While violence is always discouraged, people have every right to be suspicious of vaccines promoted by the United Nations’ vaccination programs.

28056_1thThere is evidence that millions of women of child bearing age in Mexico, the Philippines and Nicaragua were targeted by the UN with tetanus vaccines that were laced with hCH (human chorionic gonandotropin), a hormone that is produced in women to prepare the uterus for implantation of a fertilized egg.  The hCG additive in the vaccines was coupled with a tetanus toxiod carrier that signals the body to make antibodies to fight against BOTH tetanus and hCG. These antibodies prevent a woman from being  able to carry a pregnancy. More

Is this really the America we wanted?

2 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25John Boering

__________________________________________________________

In my opinion……

As someone long ago said, “If God wanted us to vote, He would have given us candidates worth voting for”.  I have no idea who might have originally said that, but I have concluded they were absolutely right.  I find dyingfreedom1myself wondering if God is not up in heaven somewhere laughing his holy behind off over the joke that is our political system.  Could be God is just so tired of us!

As a gentleman in the midst of his senior years, I find myself somewhat thankful for my advanced age.  I most likely will not live to see the end results of the traitorous conduct by all factions of the political system and, the absolute ruination of this once great country.  I do not believe my soul could stand it.  I did not serve my country to see her end this way; but end she will if we do not stop the cancer that is [federal government] from eating away at the core of our nation.

Watching the successive efforts by both Democrats and Republicans to deconstruct, to disassemble, to destroy, to bastardize, the very things that made us great, is heartbreaking to watch.  We elected these people in good faith and they have returned that good faith by being the most worthless, greedy and horrible people imaginable.  There is not, in my opinion, even one of the lot them worth another day in office.

What happened to you?

It is astonishing to me to see my own countrymen turning on one another.  It seems these days that all that is necessary to become a traitor to our country, to our communities, is to don a government uniform, or carry a government badge and set about terrorizing and harassing our fellow Americans.  There is no honor in what these men and women do; they have simply become drunk on the unfettered power, the ability to torment, torture, harass and terrorize their fellow citizens.  We can see that they enjoy what they are doing and for most of us the site is enough to sicken even the most hardened among us.

But we, as a country, go even further than this.  More

Control of the Internet in Global Binding Treaty?

7 Comments

Avaaz.org

Right now at a UN meeting in Dubai, authoritarian regimes are pushing for full governmental control of the Internet in a binding global treaty — if they succeed, the internet could become less open, more costly and much slower. We have only 2 days to stop them.

The Internet has been an amazing example of people power — allowing us to connect, speak out and pressure leaders like never before. That’s largely because it’s been governed to date by users and non-profits and not governments. But now countries like Russia, China and United Arab Emirates are trying to rewrite a major telecom treaty called the ITR to bring the Internet under its control — the web would then be shaped by government interests and not by us, the users. Tim Berners Lee, one of the “fathers of the Internet,” has warned that this could increase censorship online and invade our privacy. But if we object with a massive people-powered petition, we can strengthen the hand of countries fighting this power grab.

We have stopped attacks like this before and can do it again before the treaty text is locked this week. A wave of opposition to a new ITR is already building — sign the petition to tell governments hands off our Internet! and then forward this email to everyone you know — when we hit 1 million signers, it’ll be delivered straight to the delegates at this cozy meeting: More

Heather Gass: Organizing Agenda 21 resistance in California

6 Comments

strip banner

citizenstownhall.org

Heather Gass

Make Northern California and the East Bay better!

  • We’re here to help.
    • America is changing and you will have questions
    • We’re here to answer those questions.
  • We need your help
    • We need you to talk to your friends and tell them to look at this website
  • Although we focus on Northern California issues, these restrictions are coming to you where ever you are.
    • Get involved with the good people in your community!

Agenda 21 – The United Nations controlling your property

  • The United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century is a global plan for inventory and control of all resources, private property and humans. Congress, both Democrats and Republicans have endorsed this agenda that will ultimately lead to the eradication of private property rights and the sovereignty of the United States to the United Nations. Read more...

One Bay Area – Bureaucracies overruling your town, city and county

  • In 2008,  SB375 “The Sustainable Communities Strategy Bill” was passed.  This bill mandates that unelected “Councils of Government” and “Transit Authorities” create a regional land use and transportation plan that will if adopted negatively impact your local town, city or county.  Under the slogan, “Save the Planet”, these authorities will take your civil liberties and freedom to live where you want and force future generations to live in subsidized “stack and pack” crowded apartments near bus stops and train stations Read more…

Health Care – Government control of your life

  • The “Affordable Care and Patient Production Act” is law, verified by the Supreme Court, with more enforcement by the IRS each day.  Complex and costly, you already see it’s effects on your paycheck and on the notices that your employer has provided you. You will have your picture taken and your social security number recorded by you doctor and your Medical Records are now being sent to Washington. First, you must understand what it is and then what to do. Read More….

What is happening to your Health Care? More

H. Res. 814: In defense of the second amendment

10 Comments

Marti Oakley (c) Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

_________________________________________________________________

Apparently there are still a few public officials who will honor the Constitution left in the House of Representatives.  Many of these representatives recognized the threat to the second amendment inherent in the UN Small Arms Treaty.  This treaty, which the president has indicated he would sign, bypassing congress and ratification by the states, is intended to be handed back over to the Secretary of State to implement by agency decree and imposed upon the states.

While being sold to the public as simply a guideline for limiting the sales of small arms to the same countries we are many times waging war with, the treaty would severely affect the sale and ownership of small arms i.e., private gun ownership, here in the states.  The obvious end goal included in many other global goals,  is the disarmament of US gun owners.

The UN Small Arms treaty is nothing more than the effort to end all gun ownership anywhere in the world, except those weapons used by the military forces around the globe. With the UN attempting to gift itself the right to construct its own military with an eye on becoming the only military force on the planet, our right to keep and bear arms is more important than ever.

The Small Arms Treaty will not slow down or even minimally impact the arms trading and dealing that is conducted globally.

Arms controls for peace while we expand the global wars

“In what has to be the epitome of duplicity, Hillary Clinton is now conspiring with UN officials to begin the disarmament of the citizens of the US via this pseudo-treaty. Its all for world peace, right? Obviously not, as Clinton gave an excited speech in May 2012, to the Special Operations Forces Industry Conference describing the new six-point global plan for war intended to encompass numerous countries and her obvious desire for her department to be part and parcel of the newly emerging “global wars everywhere” plan. Clinton’s obvious disregard or refusal to acknowledge the deaths of children resulting from these wars is clearly an indication that the woman is lying about her desire for world peace. But I think we already knew that.”

Please contact your representatives and encourage them to support H.Res. 814.  It may well be just another half-hearted effort to make you think they are actually opposed to this treaty, but it will give you a chance to voice your objections directly to your representative.  FIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVE

Read the bill …. More

Rosa Koire “Behind the Green Mask of UN Agenda 21”

5 Comments

     Please join us Monday, October 15th, 2012 at 12:00 CST! More

No debate in the presidential debates

19 Comments

 Marti Oakley

_______________________________________________________________________

About those scripted presidential debates

Is there anyone out there who is actually anticipating the presidential debates? I am at a loss to find more than a handful of people who even express any interest in the upcoming election. In fact, I ran an in house poll asking people to answer this question, which at this point, 315 people have responded to.

Will you vote in the presidential election?

* Yes, I always vote! 10.48 % (33 votes)

* No, I can’t support any of these candidates. 33.33% (105 votes)

* Yes, I always vote to support my party. 2.54% (8 votes)

* No, I won’t support either of these partys. 37.48 % (118 votes)

* What’s the point? An illegal will probably vote using my identity. 10.16% (32 votes)

* Other 6.03% (19 votes)

I believe my poll is most likely more reflective of the common mind-set. I didn’t ask skewed questions. I didn’t ask only those who are registered in my party (because I don’t have a party affiliation). I just asked anyone who took the time to answer the poll the simple question posed above.

About those debates……. More

Let’s just call it “Obomney” and move on

14 Comments

Marti Oakley

_____________________________________________________

Vote for “Obomney”!

Try as they might, MSM just can’t get the fire stoked under the 2012 election.  Few, if any at all, are remotely concerned with what will simply be the crowning of yet another internationalist/globalist/world economy talking head.  I do believe the American public is fed up with phony partisanship, fictional political divides and who can tell the biggest lies and still get re-elected or, elected for the first time.  Obama? Romney?

Let’s just call it “Obomney” and move on. More

Deconstruction of the United States

28 Comments

Marti Oakley © Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved **See Reservations below.

_______________________________________________________________________

The deconstruction of the United States is nearing completion.

Plans set in motion decades ago are now beginning to become a reality.  Everything we were, or thought we were, has been carefully and strategically taken apart and reassembled as part of the United Nations plantation.  The UN is the headquarters for the burgeoning world government and for decades our elected officials, unelected bureaucrats and other shadowy figures that slither about the halls of what was our government, have worked tirelessly to bring about our end.  We are just about there.

The redistribution of wealth 

There is a redistribution of the nation’s wealth occurring, only it isn’t the redistribution from the wealthy to the poor even though many politicians and media talking heads would like us to think so.

Actually, just the reverse is true.  The current economic depression has been years in the staging, resulting in massive job losses here in the US while foreign slave labor markets were exploited.  The reduction in overall wealth is being experienced only by the working and poorer classes, while the wealth of the upper 10% and corporations, has increased significantly.  This was no accident.  All that has happened is the result of intentional actions.

In order to avoid all out civil revolt over the preferential treatment given corporations, banking thugs and thieves and the “too wealthy to have to pay taxes” class, those who found themselves without work were given unemployment benefits and food stamps.  Just enough to keep them quiet while simultaneously launching a vicious campaign against these same people, and referring to them in derogatory terms.  The intent?  To divert your attention away from those who were profiting immensely at the expense of the nation.  And it worked!  Look at the number of politicians, so-called news broadcasters and others who continue to berate and marginalize those who have no jobs, and who continue to pander to the wealthy and known corporate thugs as if their crimes were of no consequence.

The end result is that our wealth is being redistributed to the already wealthy and corporations and instead of going after these groups and holding them accountable many of us turned on our fellow American’s with a vengeance and blamed them for events and results they had no control over.

Even the most hard core protectors of the elite have had to dispense with the mantra that we should absolve the wealthy and corporations of taxes, because they are the job creators.  If we tax them….they will leave and go else where.  Newsflash!   They already did!  They created jobs everywhere but here in the US. They off shored to cheap labor markets that were ripe for exploitation ending American jobs that were badly needed here at home.  And they replaced those US jobs with…nothing.

The colonization of America More

UN Small Arms Treaty & Obama’s six-point plan for global war

23 Comments

Marti Oakley     © Copyright 2012     All Rights Reserved  **See Reservations below.

_______________________________________________________________________

A war of lies on a global scale

Most Americans have their eye on the UN Small Arms Treaty; a treaty intended to circumvent our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms.  The backlash against this treasonous treaty is massive, not only because it is a direct assault on the 2nd Amendment and our right to defend ourselves against an increasingly tyrannical government, but because it also is the final act in handing over control of our military to a foreign government: the United Nations.  This submission of US military forces to UN control was exposed in the recent testimonies of Panetta and Dempsey in front of the Senate committee, claiming they go to the UN for approval for war, not to congress.

The absolute silence from the Senate committee members regarding this claim, and the subsequent refusal and failure of the Senators to have  Panetta and Dempsey immediately arrested and charged with treason, spoke volumes about who and what these Senators actually represent.  To have this declaration of subordination to the UN expressed by these two jackasses was then followed up by Hillary Clinton joining the fray at the UN on the Small Arms Treaty.

Hillary Clinton has said she will sign the treaty, although she has no constitutional authority to do so, and Obama has said he will second that signing, also an act of treason, not to mention unconstitutional. Supposedly, the treaty can then be handed over to the State department for enforcement, bypassing the Constitutional requirement that any such treaty be ratified by the Senate.  The problem is, it would not be a constitutionally recognized treaty and would not be the supreme law of the land trumping states laws and rights, but it will be sold to the public as if it is and all your state officials will submit your state to it. More

THE CREATURE FROM THE OCEAN’S FLOOR – THE LAW OF THE SEA TREATY

18 Comments

 John W. Wallace/PPJ Contributor
“The Treaty would essentially give the United Nations, a notoriously corrupt, anti-American, anti-capitalist and un-democratic organization, the power to assert control over 70% of the earth’s surface.”
_________________________________________________________________
Although many Americans may never have heard of the Law of the Sea Treaty and those who did know about it probably thought it was dead on arrival in the U.S. Senate a couple of year ago, are in for a shock. Yes, the Creature from the Ocean’s Floor, better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) is back and it is rearing its ugly, globalist head once again. The LOST is a national sovereignty-killing creature created by supporters of the New World Order who also want the United Nations to ultimately be the one and only world government. It is specifically designed to destroy the sovereignty of all nations, to limit the rights of their citizens and take control over the majority of the earth’s resources in the oceans, including those within America’s territorial waters. The enemies of Liberty and Freedom have created a monster that poses more of a danger to America’s sovereignty and to our individual Freedoms and Liberty than any foreign military force ever has and we must be prepared to kill the creature before it kills us.
The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was first conceived in the early 1980’s by the United Nations as a method for them to gain control of most of the activities on, over, and beneath the ocean’s surface. The fundamental premise of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that the resources on the ocean’s floor belong to all of the people of the world and those resources should be protected and controlled by an international organization like the United Nations. Although that may sound like a noble goal, in order to achieve this goal, the United Nations has created a multinational, bureaucratic creature called the International Seabed Authority (“ISA”) and charged this entity with regulating and controlling the world’s mineral resources in the oceans.
When President Reagan was president, he objected to several of the treaty’s provisions that would have resulted in surrendering our nation’s sovereignty and refused to sign it, but that didn’t stop the proponents of world government and the New World Order. In 1994, the “progressives (a nice term used to describe communists) at the United Nations decided to keep moving forward with their plans by creating a diversion they called an  “Agreement of Implementation” that was supposed to address the concerns of the United States and other industrialized nations. It didn’t change anything. This new agreement was all smoke and mirrors, but our Oxford educated, globalist president Bill Clinton signed it anyway.  The Senate, however, refused to ratify it, as required by the U.S. Constitution. More

Panetta, Dempsey and treason: And Congress did nothing

28 Comments

 Marti Oakley Copyright 2012

_____________________________________________________________________

The recent statements by Leon Panetta and joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, to the effect that they are under no obligation to the Congress to seek their permission to start wars.  Both Panetta and Dempsey claim their authority comes from the United Nations and NATO.  These were clear and unambiguous declarations of submission to foreign governments, agencies and organizations and ended with the dismissing of the Constitution as not applicable to them or their decisions. I have to wonder why both men were not frog-marched out of the meeting and straight to jail.  But then, we are talking about the District of Criminals here and we know it is rare that anyone from the District ever goes to jail no matter how anti-American, unlawful or unconstitutional or treasonous their activities or views.

Both men did however, say they might inform congress

Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”

The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.”

So, if I understand this correctly: They would seek permission from non-US entities and then if they thought it was any business of the United States as to how our military would be used…….they would make a decision as to whether or not they would “want” to get permission from Congress?  And these two are actually still walking around free?

Note:  My goal would be to see Panetta and Dempsey both tried for treason and publicly hung.  International permission be damned and congress along with it. 

I believe it was this moment in time that Senator Sessions and his companions in the meeting realized that they were being given notice that their services were no longer needed.  Panetta and Dempsey publicly, effectively declared that Congress was of no further use.  More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: