Home

WHY DIDN’T ANYONE TELL ME? “BEHIND THE CLOUD”

1 Comment

new-logo25Author, Chuck Frank

The BEAST - photo1Well, the WORD has been out for a long time, and even for centuries, that is. However I will tell you once more about the BIG STORY but first I will begin with this.

The world is presently under massive intrusion and surveillance but to the point that even the the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel had her encrypted cellphone hacked by the NSA of the U.S. During October of 2013. You don’t have to be a VIP to be exempt from this kind of treatment and the invasion of your privacy. But this in no way compares to the following and ongoing agenda brought to you by
the European banking elite.

The computer system called the B.E.A.S.T.S., in Brussels, Belgium records ATM and debit card transactions within 57 seconds and It knows what you bought and where you bought it. B.E.A.S.T.S…stands for Brussels Electronic Accounting Surveillance Terminal Systems. It is a Cray Super Computer also known as The Beast of the Apocalypse: 666 B.E.A.S.T. Battle Engagement  And Simulated Tracking.” More

Judge Rules Administrative Court System Illegal After 81 Years

3 Comments

“The following Federal Court ruling opens Pandora’s Box per lower court authority / conflicts of interest to rule on or be involved in broad judicial court matters involving you.

In effect it helps protect “you” from being run through the mill by local “administrative” courts. Their “authority” to do so is brought into question if not nullified by the following Federal Court ruling.

The Battle for individual protection under the law from the abuses of local government “Administrative” courts begins.. Please share with those that would have an interest in these matters.”

Sent FYI from,

Walter Burien – CAFR1.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Armstrong Economics

Well it has been a long time coming, but all along there have been discussions behind closed doors (never in public) that the Administrative Law Courts established with the New Deal were totally unfounded and unconstitutional. With the anniversary of Magna Carta and the right to a jury trial coming up on June 15 after 800 years, the era of Roosevelt’s big government is quietly unraveling.

A federal judge’s ruling against the Securities and Exchange Commission for using its own Administrative Law judges in an insider trading case is perhaps the beginning of the end of an alternative system of justice that took root in the New Deal. Constitutionally, the socialists tore everything about the idea of a Democracy apart. It was more than taxing one party to the cheers of another in denial of equal protection. It was about creating administrative agencies (1) delegating them to create rules with the force of law as if passed by Congress sanctioned by the people; (2) the creation of administrative courts that defeated the Tripartite government structure usurping all power into the hand of the executive branch, as if this were a dictatorship run by the great hoard of unelected officials.

Not discussed in the coverage of this story is that the Administrative Law Courts are a fiefdom, to put it mildly. They have long been corrupt and traditionally rule in favor of their agencies, making it very costly for anyone to even try to defend themselves. If someone were to attempt this feat, first they have to wear the costs of an Administration proceeding and appeal to an Article III court judge, then they must appeal to the Court of Appeals, and finally plea to the Supreme Court. The cost of such adventures is well into the millions, and good luck on actually getting justice. More

Will Minnesota join the efforts to end corporate personhood?

5 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley           (c) copyright 2013 All rights reserved

_________________________________________________________________

Minnesota could be the 17th state to support a US Constitutional amendment to end corporate personhood and the constitutional rights, belonging to human beings, that have been given to corporations.  When the Supreme Court knowingly handed down a ruling in Citizens v United that said corporations were persons and that the cash they flooded elections with was free speech, we should have, as citizens of our respective states, demanded the removal and disbanding of this court.  Any legitimacy they may have had has long since dissipated as one unconstitutional ruling after another has been handed down that adversely affects the daily lives of the general public.

The rationale for this ruling was that supposedly, because corporations are made up of people, that meant the corporation was a “person”.  Actually, not.  The corporation exists on paper as a  business, doing business as a collective entity.  It has no life apart from this collective.

With respect to Citizens v United, the question should have been:

Is it possible to breathe life into a paper entity?  Thereby creating a living, breathing person with Constitutional rights and protections. 

The distrust of the Supreme Court is well-earned.  Whether conservatives or liberals control the court makes no difference.  This court serves political and corporate interests, not those of the Constitution and the common populations of the states.   More

The fictional fiscal cliff

5 Comments

new-logo25 Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

__________________________________________________________

The public could have fixed this problem in short order

If you ask most people what the so-called fiscal cliff was comprised of, most cannot tell you.  They have no idea.  If you ask most congressional members what it was comprised of, most will simply tell  you what their pet peeves were/are, and yet most haven’t the vaguest notion of what was supposedly about to befall us as a nation if we went over that non-existent cliff.

The end-of-year fiscal cliff was a carefully staged production where we were led to believe that the two factions of the one party system in the District of Criminals were going “balls-to the walls” in a fight over whether or not the wealthy should be taxed to help reduce the massive and unsustainable debt the Criminals had wracked up, or, should they just increase the taxes on the middle and working classes so that the wealthy could retain more of their wealth?

Here are some quick tips on how the US government has squandered billions, if not trillions on pointless, useless and totally worthless programs. More

5 Ways DHS Violates the Constitution with Website Domain Seizures

2 Comments

David Makarewicz, Contributing Writer
Activist Post

Last week, Bryan McCarthy, the 32 year old operator of ChannelSurfing.net, was arrested on charges of criminal copyright infringement.  ChannelSurfing.net was one of the streaming sports sites that had its domain seized by federal authorities shortly before the Super Bowl as part of the “In Our Sites” program, run by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).  Prior to the seizure, McCarthy reportedly made more than $90,000 from advertisements on his site.

This arrest has once again raised questions about the In Our Sites program, in which the Government has seized thousands of domains accused, but not convicted, of copyright infringement, illegal streaming of sporting events, selling black market goods and distributing child pornography.  Critics ranging from bloggers to individual rights advocates to Senators have questioned the constitutionality of these seizures.

The most serious constitutional issues arise because the Government does not provide any notice to the domain owners prior to seizing them.  One moment, their normal site is up at their web address, the next moment, all that is up at their web address is a DHS/ICE seal.  Without knowing what they have been accused of or having the opportunity to defend their site, the Government has repurposed the owners’ private property.

In order to seize the domain names without notice to the owners, the Government uses a procedure that permits it to bring an action directly against a piece of property used in the commission of a crime–in this case the domain name–rather than the owner.  This type of action (called an “In Rem” forfeiture) is not new.  In the past, the government has used In Rem actions for purposes such as an action against an automobile used to transport bootleg whiskey. READ FULL ARTICLE

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”

15 Comments

By Marti Oakley (c) 2010   All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________

“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

_______________________________________________

judge_deesWashington D.C., known more these days as the “district of criminals” commits so many crimes each day as a collective body that a moratorium on government should be declared until we can clean this nest of globalists, these kissers of corporate butts who seem more determined to protect their own private interests than protecting our country from obliteration by global cabals. 

As congress moves forward with plans to end our sovereignty, as they collude with foreign interests to take our jobs, to destroy our culture and to subject us to international laws and agreements harmful to us as a nation, we need to remember who we are.  We are not globalists; we are Americans.  We are not “citizens” of some new world… We are not a collection of mindlessly identified numbers and codes, biometric identifiers, or mindless sheep that don’t understand what is being done to our nation. We are the greatest society to have ever existed.  WE ARE AMERICANS.  More

CCHC: What makes you sputter with disbelief about ObamaCare?

Leave a comment

I’m off to Washington, D.C. on Monday discussing anti-ObamaCare strategies with Members of Congress. While I’m there for the week, let me ask you to have some fun and be engaged for freedom right where you are!

What makes you sputter with disbelief about ObamaCare?

You can Vote for the WORST one below…and support CCHC at the same time!

$13 = the 13 times ObamaCare forbids judicial review of federal (Dept. of HHS) regulations.
$21 = the 21 new ObamaCare taxes.
$30 = the 30 new rosters of political appointees authorized by ObamaCare.
$40 = the 40% tax on high-cost health plans.
$53 = the 53 new HHS regulations authorized by ObamaCare.
$60 = the 60 U.S. Senators who voted for ObamaCare.
$68 = the 68 times ObamaCare authorizes the expenditure of, “such sums as may be necessary.”
$123 = the average amount deducted from your paycheck for the CLASS Act unless you opt-out.
$219 = the 219 Democrat Representatives who voted for ObamaCare .
$560 = the 560 times “health plan” is written in by ObamaCare. True insurance not allowed.
$695 = the minimum fine an individual will pay if he or she doesn’t buy health insurance.
$906 = the 906 pages of the fine-print, reduced-size version of ObamaCare.
$1501 = Section 1501 which unconstitutionally requires citizens to purchase health insurance.
$2014 = the year ObamaCare will be implemented if not repealed.
$3267 = the 3,267 times “Secretary” is mentioned (empowered) in ObamaCare.
$____ = the number of lies you think you have heard about ObamaCare. 🙂

Pick one and then Donate that amount to CCHC to help us Defeat it!

More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: