Neither Congress, nor any state legislature, has ever voted to approve any of the 47 U.N. Biosphere Reserves in the United States. (quote)Henry Lamb
On May 13, 2013, Minnesota representatives submitted a bill to end any involvement within or by the state with United Nations Agenda 21. AG21, recognized across the country as a threat to private property rights and ownership. AG21 calls for all land to be owned and controlled by the [state]. In this matter, the state referred to is the federal corporation that occupies The District of Criminals, known commonly as Washington D.C..
Several other states have already passed, or are in the process of passing anti-UN Agenda 21 legislation, recognizing this plan as a threat to the sovereignty and continuance of the United States.
You are a brand new Country!
President Richard Nixon issued Executive Order # 11647 on February 14, 1972, which created this new country. How did he conceive this reorganization plan? The United Nations passed a resolution that the United States must reorganize into 10 super regions and President Nixon complied by issuing this Executive Order. Obviously, this plan would not have survived the exposure that would have been necessary for Congress to have enacted this plan. Therefore, Nixon utilized the awesome, and often, illegal, power of the Executive Order to create this reorganization. EO 11647
Get the United Nations out of the United States
IF this bill should pass, this could effectively halt the plans the United Nations has for converting portions of Minnesota into a “no human habitat” zone within the Wildlands and Biodiversity corridors scams they operate. These corridors supposedly would restore the environment to a previously unknown condition of perfection. We just have to get those pesky people to give up the land! Once this is done, the lands sequestered under this foreign government program would be ripe for rip & ship policies that allow corporations to extract and ship as quickly as possible any resources on or within the land. These resources would no longer be the property of the people of the state of Minnesota, neither public or private, and would instead be under the control of the United Nations to dispose of as they choose.
I can only imagine the care they would take to manage the land responsibly. (sarc)
Please give your support to these Representatives who have authored this bill.
We need your help on something very important. We’re working on a legal challenge to the huge 9 county 101 city regional plan here in the San Francisco Bay: One Bay Area. This regional plan is different from the others in the US and we believe it’s a prototype for forced implementation of UN Agenda 21’s ‘Islands of Human Habitation’.
Plan Bay Area/One Bay Area includes Priority Development Areas (see attached map) that are targeted to contain 80% of the residential and 66% of the commercial development over the next 25 years. This is extremely important because it is a violation of the 5th and the 14th amendments (takings/due process/just compensation, and equal protection) and will restrict development to less than 4% of the land area in the SF Bay Area. These PDAs are within Urban Growth Boundaries but create new de facto urban growth boundaries because people who own property within the UGBs will not be able to develop unless (presumably) 80% of the population increase has already been accommodated within the PDAs. More
DEVELOPING A WINNING STRATEGY (Speech to SF Bay Area leaders)
As I travel around the country I’m asked the same question: What can we do—is there a chance of winning?
I’m asked this question by women and men, by Republicans and Democrats, by Libertarians and Tea Party members, by young and old, by rural and urban residents. My answer is always the same. We can do a lot and yes, we will win.
Now, that’s a powerful statement and has to be backed up with tactics or it’s just empty rhetoric.
In this gathering today, in addressing you who are in leadership and organizing positions, it’s necessary to discuss strategy. A good idea acted on at the wrong time is wasted. An action with no follow-up is lost. An assertion without a solid grounding in facts destroys credibility.
The shocking truth that we all deal with on a daily basis is that UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan to inventory and control all resources, both human and natural, all means of production, and all information in the world. Twenty years ago the Agenda for the 21st Century was agreed to by our government and then implemented through executive order in 1993. It hides in plain sight—masquerading as regional plans, climate action plans, as scenic byways, as smart meters, as domestic surveillance, as land trusts, as Outcome Based Education, as sustainable communities strategies, as public/private partnerships, as comprehensive or master or general plans. Because it is a stealth plan we are at a tremendous disadvantage in bringing it to the public’s awareness. We are smeared in the media and in our neighborhoods, called conspiracy theorists, and disregarded. We’re subjected to a disinformation campaign that is Delphi’ing the entire world.
What you and I know is that it takes courage to fight this, and that is against us, too. Because most people are afraid. We live in a culture of fear. Global warming, terrorism, food shortages, economic collapse—these are all part of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. More
Dan Peterson is the Executive Director of Florida Property Rights Coalition, a fast growing group of property rights activists. UN Agenda 21 calls for the end of individual property ownership and with the complicity of our own state and federal governments is moving ahead in their efforts to end or severely restrict individual property rights.
“Sadly, over the past few decades, there has been a steady erosion of these fundamental tenets of our nation. The ever-growing maze of regulatory restrictions on property use is placing excessive burdens on property owners. And, the growth of government and government owned property is contributing to the rapid disappearance of private property all together. These trends are growing at an alarmingly accelerated rate and must be reversed!
The CPR website is designed to help you in your advocacy for private property rights.”
About every 15-20 years, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rewrites a Resource Management Plan for areas that include not only rural areas, but big cities like Los Angeles.
Then, for the next 15-20 years, every proposed project, plan and Environmental Assessment is based on this Resource Management Plan (RMP).
HOW BLM CLOSES PUBLIC ROADS
With these RMPs, the BLM (along with the Forest Service) has ramped up limiting & closing off public access to public roads and lands. In RMPs (Route of Travel Designations), the BLM designates publicroads as “open,” “limited use” or “closed” to Off-Highway Vehicles (OHVs). This can include 4 wheel drive pickup trucks, not just All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) and dirt bikes. Public lands can also be designated as “open,” “limited” or “closed.” Designations can change from “limited” to “closed.”
For instance, at the Tavaputs Plateau in Utah, the BLM has been trying to close roads that lead to some of the most popular routes and scenic vistas in that county. It’s also the area where Bill Barrett Corp. is conducting a massive natural gas field development The BLM intends to close the roads for 30 years.
If these road closures are really about protecting habitat, then how can BLM possibly justify how your 4 wheel drive truck could cause more harm to the environment than a massive extraction project that has about 488 well pads (with 20 well pads in Wilderness Study Areas and 218 well pads in areas with Wilderness Characteristics), 164 miles of new roads, 3,390 acres of initial disturbance (before reclamation) and 1,705 acres of long term disturbance?
RMPs used to be about 160 pages or less. Now, the new RMPs can be over a thousand pages (with an additional CD of Route of Travel Inventory Maps). The old RMPs had straightforward topics in the table of contents like land use allocations, livestock grazing, land tenure adjustments, oil and gas lease stipulations, and areas of critical environmental concern. More
Featuring Michael Shaw, Attorney, founder of Freedom Advocates.org, author, expert on all branches of Agenda 21 – “How Sustainable Development Destroys the Natural World” Assemblyman Tim Donnelly of the 59th District, San Bernardino, former… Read More Share this event on Facebook and Twitter We hope you can make it!
Sonoma County Eagle Forum and Eagle Forum of California
Mark Anthony in his famous monologue in Julius Caesar:
“Why, friends, you go to do you know not what.
“Now let it work. Mischief, thou art afoot, Take thou what course thou wilt!”
Substitute the word “Truth” … “Truth thou art afoot” … Then we have a good chance. “The Whole truth and nothing but the truth”.
Smart Meters is a grid designed to control and incarcerate the public. It is a project from the science of the Department of Defense overseen by MITRE the intelligence operation under former James Schlesinger located in McLean, Virginia.
PG&E has contracts to deploy the spy meters with a front for the World Bank, a UN “NGO”called ICLEI. ICLEI is imposing world government mandates and getting monies even from the European Union.
ICLEI’s Murder Meters and Spy Grid Turning Mr Roger Neighborhood into Electronic Internment Camps
The “Electronic Internment Camps” … Murder Meters and the Spy Grid were designed by agencies that are informally coordinated under David Boran (skull & bones). Radio waves directed as weapons via frequencies and spying with calculated two way communication devices. There are records on file originating from U. S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Freedom of Information (FOI) request showing the development of these technotronic sciences for total control. More
How does the UN, Monsanto, mining, and oil & gas companies get their hands into Bureau of Land Mangement (BLM) Resource Management Plans and Environmental Assessments to dictate the use of our public lands (and our future)?
Well, I found one way. I noticed that two companies, Tetra Tech and Environmental Management & Planning Solutions, Inc. (EMPSi), are preparing BLM (and Forest Service) Resource Management Plans (RMPs), Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Environmental Assessments (EAs) and other reports. (So what do we pay BLM employees to do, just look pretty in their uniforms?)
Tetra Tech
It’s not some small environmental company. Tetra Tech has 13,000 employees in 330 offices around the world. Tetra tech owns about 25 other companies and makes billions of dollars in annual revenues. They work with developers, nuclear power, energy, mining and minerals processing, etc. On the Tetra Tech website, it declares: “Our Mission:To be the premier worldwide consulting, engineering, and construction firm.”
Tetra Tech even bought PRO-Intelligent, an international security and intelligence consulting firm used by the US State Department. So they seem to have their hands in everything.
The most troubling aspect about Tetra Tech preparing the plans for the BLM can be seen by looking at Tetra Tech’s Board of the Directors:
Hugh M. Grant is the Chairman, President and CEO of Monsanto.
(on Tetra Tech’s website, this fact was omitted in his bio). Why would Monsanto’s CEO be on the Board of an engineering and construction company? More
President Obama’s new Rural Council is led by the Department of Agriculture (USDA).
How does the USDA tie into the United Nations and international laws?
Let’s look at the USDA’s Forest Service.
USDA’s FOREST SERVICE (FS)
The Forest Service is also on the USDA’s Invasive Species Council, and issued a report about Invasive Species titled “Addressing the Four Threats in an International Context,” which states “While the U.S. is not party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), forest service experts participate in invasive species working groups sponsored by the CBD to share information and establish guidelines for border control, mitigation, and management.”
Does this vague supposed difference between “party to” and “participate” seem a little loosey goosey to you? (The Convention on Biological Diversity is a United Nations treaty that our U.S. Senate didn’t ratify, so it seems like U.S. government agencies shouldn’t be a “party to” participating in these “working groups.”)
This report also states: “The Forest Service is a member of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), an international partnership of government agencies and non-governmental organizations interested in nature conservation. The IUCN hosts the Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG).”
On the IUCN website, it states: “IUCN links its Mission to the paramount goals of the international community on environment and sustainable development, in particular Agenda 21…” More
More importantly, above this description is the OBJECTIVE, which is “the encouragement of communally and collectively owned and managed land.”
__________________________________________
People have noticed the 25 government agencies on Obama’s new White House Rural Council. And, they’re questioning what might be the need for all of them.
What people may not have noticed yet, is that the government agencies in this council are also on other councils. These councils, as well as the individual government agencies, are implementing international laws that have taken effect through Executive Orders, Memorandums of Understanding, agreements and regulations that most Americans don’t even know about. These have bypassed Congress. And, it also seems they have completely bypassed the Constitution.
The devil is in the details
These agencies and councils are forming “partnerships” with members and groups other than the American people. However, our tax dollars pay for their salaries and for the programs.
Some “partnerships” sound innocuous, but as you might guess, the devil is in the details.
I’ll give you an example. There is a BioEco Working Group ( www.bioeco.gov), which at first glance seems to be part of the Department of Interior’s U.S.Geological Survey, since it is listed as creating the website. But the actual Charter has National Science and Technology Council in the heading. (The National Science and Technology Council includes20of the same agencies that are on the new Rural Council, but with some additional agencies, including the CIA. It also includes the Vice-President, Cabinet Secretaries, heads of Agencies and some White House officials.) More
Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All rights reserved
___________________________________________
New Council or not, it would be a relatively simple matter to halt the coming terrorism by corporate federal agencies against agricultural property owners. Our governors would have only to refuse any contracting with these federal corporations which would deny them access inside the geographical boundaries of the states.
GUEST: TOM DeWEESE – from the AMERICAN POLICY CENTER
AMERICAN LIBERTY vs. the UN’s SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
My Guest this week is Tom DeWeese and we will be talking about the UN’s Agenda 21 and the concept of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Under the program designed by the UN, in Sustainable Development there can be no concern over individual rights – as we must all sacrifice for the sake of the environment. Individual human wants, needs, and desires are to be conformed to the views and dictates of social planners. Sustainable development is more about control of the people than it is about preserving the planet and most people do not know about it. It’s about puting Nature above Man; it’s about the redistribution of your wealth. People are encouraged to call in to ask a question or give us your thoughts.
Please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326) and or email your questions or opinions to me in the Show’s Chat Room and I will read them on the air.
Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.
If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: john@TeaPartyRep.com (note the new email address – the previous one was just too long).
Marti Oakley
country. How did he conceive this reorganization plan? The United Nations passed a resolution that the United States must reorganize into 10 super regions and President Nixon complied by issuing this Executive Order. Obviously, this plan would not have survived the exposure that would have been necessary for Congress to have enacted this plan. Therefore, Nixon utilized the awesome, and often, illegal, power of the Executive Order to create this reorganization. EO 11647 
