Home

Sustaining treason: Blueprint for restructuring our government

9 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley ©Copyright 2013 All rights reserved

_________________________________________________________________________

“Why is it, every time the jackasses in the District of Criminals have run some program into the ground, squandered massive amounts of dollars while letting corporations write bills that benefit them and rape and rob the states, they always come out and say; “The system is broken”. “We’ve got to fix the system, it is broken”. It’s an emergency! We have to do something right now! And that is all quickly followed by one phony “crisis” after another as they try to scare the public into believing the “crisis” just magically and mysteriously appeared.”

_______________________________________________________________

Recent news reports highlighted the announcement of a proposed restructuring of the United States government (USA.Inc.).  The collusion of privately owned federal corporations that operate under fraud, color of “law”, and fictions of law, are now openly conspiring with other Non-governmental agencies in an effort to by-pass any remaining restrictions on their plundering and theft of the states assets and adherence to UN Agenda 21, Chapter 8  The conversion to a one-world government where the individual governmentnot only will not be able to own anything, but can be found at any time to have violated some or all of the 23 million fictionally created rules, regulations, statutes or codes, issued by government and private corporations against the people, will be expanded.

An overt act of treason against the people of the sovereign states, is underway.  Un-elected bureaucracies,  created for no other reason than to by-pass Constitutional provisions and prohibitions against a centralized all-controlling government have been published in a study called    Sustainability For the Nation: Resource connections and government linkages.  This is a blueprint for finalizing the destruction of our Constitutional Republic, centralizing all power in one branch and totally dis-empowering the people then rendering the Constitution dead once and for all, and structuring the foundations for one world government.

Should the provisions in this study be implemented to any degree, pink slips should be sent to every member of Congress, in both houses, terminating their cushy and highly protected jobs for allowing this to transpire.  This study represents a bold-faced attack on the Constitution, the rule of law and the people of the states.  What this study details is the establishment of a Homeland Security Terrorism type behemoth federal monstrosity which will quickly show itself to be a threat to the nation, just as Homeland Security Terrorism has done.

Remember when we were all fighting back against the National Animal Identification System and subsequently, the fake food safety bill?  I noted at the time that Dick Durbin, IL, pondered the idea of creating one huge behemoth agency akin to HSD:

I find it less than coincidental that Senator Durbin, in his dramatic speech on the floor of the Senate, proposed to Senator Coborn, who objected to S.510, that maybe what was needed was just one big agency to cover everything. Wonder where he came up with that idea? Just a notion; top of his head suggestion.

When those who subscribe to the phony “sustainability” plan describe what they think it entails, always it is some sense of environmental protection, some social equalization or some possible greening up of the planet for the sake of humanity.  The word “sustainability” is another of what we like to call “weasel word swaps”. (think corporate government trade agreements (contracts) as opposed to Constitutionally approved treaties.  Two entirely different concepts one binding and the other simply complied with. More

46 Treasonous Senators voted to hand our gun rights to the United Nations

Leave a comment

strip banner

We tracked this list back through several sites and were unable to determine who initially prepared it.  Thanks to them just the same!  The multiple attempts to pass gun laws abridging the 2nd Amendment are meant to by-pass the need for the states to ratify this unconstitutional treaty from the UN.  With several states passing nullification laws on several issues including gun rights, you would think these senators would get a clue and realize we will not be disarmed!

46_Senators_UN_Gun_Rights

AN OPEN LETTER TO POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS EVERYWHERE

3 Comments

The View From Montana

The View from Montana has gotten several requests for the letter read during our last night Blog Talk Radio Show. One of our frequent listeners, Marilyn shared with us this gem, that she has kept for years. A treasure that she has kept so long, that she can’t even remember where she got it from or even who penned it. TVFM has tried to research it, but hasn’t come up with anything. Perhaps one of you can fair better. Till then…

Written by [ANONYMOUS ]___________________________________________________________________

AN OPEN LETTER TO POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS EVERYWHERE:

Our forefathers gave us a Republic, you turned it into a Socialist Democracy.

We had free enterprise, you gave us managed competition and Keynesian economics. hijacked

We had a Treasury, you gave us a central bank in the Federal Reserve.

We had an industrial base unparalleled in the history of the world, you gutted it.

We had the best merchant fleet, you scrapped it.

We had fifty sovereign States, you gave us ten Federal Regions.

Where we once had law, you gave us social engineering in lieu of justice.

We had an educational system that worked, you turned it into a propaganda mill for political correctness.

Our military, until Korea, was undefeated. You turned it into a hired gun for the U.N.

Where we once stood alone, completely self-sufficient and a true world leader, you gave us  global interdependence.

To accomplish all this, you taxed us unmercifully.

You abandoned the Constitution in favor of the U.N. Charter.

In short, you, the politicians and bureaucrats, have robbed, raped and pillaged this once great nation and turned it into a provenance for what you call a “New Word Order.”

If you wonder why you are held in such contempt, you might reflect on the above reasons. Further, if you think your treason has gone unnoticed, it hasn’t.  On any given day across this land, in cafes, churches, in homes, anywhere that’s convenient to meet, people who still love this Old Republic gather.  And like it of not, they are talking about YOU!

Borrowed, Sent and Signed by a Proud, Angry American Sovereign

The UN Small Arms Treaty: Negotiating with an enemy

11 Comments

Marti Oakley     © Copyright 2012     All Rights Reserved  **See Reservations below.
 _______________________________________________________________________

On May 3rd, 1994, then President Clinton signed Presidential Directive 25 (PDD-25).  This directive placed US military commanders under the jurisdiction of the United Nations if the UN was conducting an action of some kind, anywhere.  The actual text of the directive remains sealed and classified.

PDD25 was originally written as PDD-13.  The re-write of PPD-13 and conversion to PDD-25 was needed to exclude a disclaimer from General Colin Powell, the 1993 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  This disclaimer made certain that US commanders would not have to comply with UN orders which were:

  • Outside the mandate of the mission or,
  • illegal under US law or,
  • militarily imprudent or unsound.

PDD-25 of course, removed these provisions.

#25 also makes no distinction as to where UN meddling might be taking place, and no provision was included to exclude any actions by the UN within the geographical United States.  What may keep the UN and its “peacekeeping forces” out of the US is that if they show up here, they will not get a glowing reception.  No one would be happy to see them and we would not greet them with flowers and garlands, nor would we cheer their arrival.  It is however, a distinct possibility that they would be greeted with massive amounts of fireworks.  And that appears to be a long-standing concern for those dedicated to disarming the world so that only they and their armies have weapons.  It makes overtaking one country after another so much easier if you are the only one who is armed. More

SCOTUS on illegal immigration

4 Comments

Marti Oakley        Copyright 2012- All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________________________________

On June 25th, 2012, the Supreme Court issued its final ruling on SB 1070, the law passed by Arizona to deal with illegal immigration that has been not only allowed by the federal government, but also encouraged.  The court struck down three of the primary points of the legislation, yet left one standing: Police can inquire about immigration status if an individual is being investigated for a criminal act, while they have him/her in custody.

SCOTUS went on to rule that the individual in question cannot be held longer than usual while that investigation occurs, but issued no guidelines on how long [usual] is, or could be.  This blatant omission of course is laying the groundwork for subsequent lawsuits brought by illegal immigrants in the future who will claim abuse.

It is alleged that the private prison industry which is flourishing in states like Arizona, actually wrote the legislation in anticipation of greater numbers of prisoners from which greater profits could be made.  This is more than likely, true.  The private corporate prison is a fast growing business in the US as these corporations engage in human trafficking for profit.  I cannot think of any other way to efficiently describe what the business is of these prisons, otherwise.

SCOTUS’ main contention was that the States cannot overstep the Federal government to deal with illegal immigration.  That is the job of the federale’s.  Only they aren’t doing their job and have not for more than two decades as the US has been steadily colonized by illegal immigrants who have found protection and privilege provided by the same agencies charged with defending our borders from just such an influx of illegal residents.

From the newly and constantly revised US Code & Title 8, regarding defense of our inland and coastal borders and just whom is charged with defending that border, we find this revision in the code: More

Investor State Tribunals and Treason in high places

6 Comments

Marti Oakley      ©      Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

__________________________________________________________________

Investor State Tribunals: The Trans-Atlantic Partnership AGREEMENT

A huge collection of federal corporate agents that we call “senators” and “representatives” will soon be jumping in front of Lame Street Media camera’s just for the chance to tell you how this new agreement will create thousands of new jobs.  And it will!  Only not here in the US.  These same corporate puppets will poo-poo the idea that this corporate government agreement will render our laws null and void against marauding corporations.  They will tell you that it will boost states economies to have foreign investors buying land and exploiting resources.  They will tell you any lie they think will make this sell off of our country more palatable.  And, by the time most of you figure out you just got sold out and sold off, these same liars will have taken retirement so that they can spend more time with their families.  (Oh! be still my heart!)

What this agreement will effectively accomplish is the eradication of national jurisdiction, national laws and protections and put disputes in the hands of lawyers who also expect to profit from their misdeeds.  It will sell off our land to foreign corporations and governments and firmly establish sovereign foreign territories inside the geographical US. akin to the current Free Trade Zones (257 zones) now operating across the states.

How’s that global economy working for ya? More

Panetta, Dempsey and treason: And Congress did nothing

28 Comments

 Marti Oakley Copyright 2012

_____________________________________________________________________

The recent statements by Leon Panetta and joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, to the effect that they are under no obligation to the Congress to seek their permission to start wars.  Both Panetta and Dempsey claim their authority comes from the United Nations and NATO.  These were clear and unambiguous declarations of submission to foreign governments, agencies and organizations and ended with the dismissing of the Constitution as not applicable to them or their decisions. I have to wonder why both men were not frog-marched out of the meeting and straight to jail.  But then, we are talking about the District of Criminals here and we know it is rare that anyone from the District ever goes to jail no matter how anti-American, unlawful or unconstitutional or treasonous their activities or views.

Both men did however, say they might inform congress

Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”

The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.”

So, if I understand this correctly: They would seek permission from non-US entities and then if they thought it was any business of the United States as to how our military would be used…….they would make a decision as to whether or not they would “want” to get permission from Congress?  And these two are actually still walking around free?

Note:  My goal would be to see Panetta and Dempsey both tried for treason and publicly hung.  International permission be damned and congress along with it. 

I believe it was this moment in time that Senator Sessions and his companions in the meeting realized that they were being given notice that their services were no longer needed.  Panetta and Dempsey publicly, effectively declared that Congress was of no further use.  More

Older Entries Newer Entries

%d bloggers like this: