Home

iAdvocate Radio!

Leave a comment

1c8b8e8f-0159-4e3a-acc0-c4bea0935082_images_(2)

Listen Live HERE! at  5:30 CST! More

Advertisements

Revisiting Conflicts of interest: Revoking the corporate charters of state agencies

13 Comments

 
By: Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2010-11  All Rights Reserved
1320-281-0585
 
Republished per reader requests:
______________________________________________

In each and every state, incorporated agricultural agencies and their agents have enacted and enforced rules and regulations specifically designed and enforced to interfere with the prospective economic advantage of private producers.  No where is this more apparent than in the efforts by the state agricultural agency corporations to act under “the color of law” against milk producers; setting arbitrary standards and requirements and granting themselves the authority to;

__________________________________________________

One issue seemingly untouched by the all the legal eagles out there who claim to be defending independent and family ranchers and farmers is, the conflict of interest with intent to benefit between the state corporations (in every state) operating as “Departments of Agriculture” and private and individual farmers and ranchers who are being prosecuted and persecuted as these state owned corporations are empowered to make their own laws to benefit their own interests and to enforce those laws with full knowledge that constitutional rights and protections have been fraudulently eliminated for the sovereign individuals. More

BIG PHARMA’S IMMUNITY IN VACCINE COURT

44 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved 

_______________________________________________
Natural News: Quote
Nearly 25 years ago, the U.S. Congress passed the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which exempts vaccine manufacturers from being liable for damages caused by their vaccines. The Act established an entirely new “legal” system to deal specifically with vaccine injury cases, handling each one in a special “vaccine court” that essentially just dismisses most cases as unwarranted.”

________________________________________________________

The Vaccine Liability Fund was created as an alternative to taking vaccine injury claims to court and provides a shield from prosecution for drug manufacturers.  If someone sues for vaccine injury, their case will not be heard in a normal courtroom, but in a special kangaroo court called the Vaccine Liability Court.  Consumers finance both the Vaccine Liability Fund and the Vaccine Court.  The special vaccine fund and court are based in tort law (a tort is a civil wrong) and this violates Constitutional due process.   

To apply for damages as a result of vaccines, you must first submit to the “fund”.  Your case will then be handed over to the Vaccine Liability Court which consists of a panel of 3 to 5 selected individuals called ‘Special Masters’.  The Special Masters may or may not lack a medical background and may or may not lack knowledge of Constitutional due process laws.  This is the panel that will “hear” your case to decide whether it has any merit.  There is no jury.  If your case is determined to have merit, you can receive compensation.  If the Special Masters rule against you or you are not satisfied with their decision, you then have the option of filing your case with a federal or state court.  You will likely be financially ruined by this time.  It is rare for federal and state courts to even agree to hear vaccine cases and rarer still for them to rule against Vaccine Court.
More

%d bloggers like this: