Home

From John Leckrone: This is public, judicial and constructive notice.

Leave a comment

John Leckrone

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Remember there are only 4 things an all capital letters name can be. 1. A ship. 2. A corporation. 3. A dead body. 4. A slave. Look at all of “YOUR” papers and bills from “government”. JOHN LECKRONE is not me, it is the title to a cestui que vie trust. The social security number is the number to that trust. This is what the corporations are going after. When walking into a courtroom you are walking onto a foreign pirate ship in dry dock and are considered to be all four items listed above. You are considered to be a PERSON with duties and responsibilities and not a man or a woman with unalienable rights.”

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Some people simply cannot handle the truth regarding the police and sheriff’s as being part of a criminal cabal. Most people have convinced themselves with the help of a lot of state run propaganda that the policy enforcement officers (off eye seers) and sheriff’s (shire rives) are the “good” guys.

When people like me point out the nature of the system and that these criminals with costumes, badges and guns are agents of corruption of a country wide extortion racket we are blackballed. Most people are statists who believe that they have benevolent masters. Who makes the best slaves? Those who do not recognize their slave status. Thus they consider us to be crazy when we challenge their deeply held beliefs and expose them to truth.

Yes I am anti “cop” because I know what every one of them are. I have explained it to each of you several times on my timeline here on facebook. Yet that does not make me anti law which is the perception. It makes me anticorruption and antiracketeering. There is a difference between legal and lawful and just because doing something may be illegal that does not necessarily make it unlawful. Also just because something legal under the color of law that does not make it lawful if it is causing harm.

This deeply held conviction of mine sometimes costs me “friends” which is the reason for me now writing this article here. I am tired of being seen as the bad guy because I know the truth and do not worship at the alter of the thin blue line. I refuse to kiss the boots of tyrants acting under the color of law. I instead expose these people in uniform for their crimes in the hopes that maybe one day people will stand together to take back their rights to live in peace instead of fear and perhaps a few of these criminals will change their ways and wake up to their actual job title of mafia enforcer. On that same note though I am very much in favor of peace officers whose only job is to keep the peace and protect people’s unalienable right’s and property. Make absolutely no mistake, sheriff’s and police officers are not peace officers and if asked bluntly will admit this fact.

Finding a man or woman who is actually a peace officer is like looking for a pin in a haystack. Even the “good” cops usually commit several common law felonies every day while “doing their job”. The few people who I have heard about that go out of their way not to plunder from the general population on behalf of their masters find themselves working lousy jobs and passed over for promotions and in some cases even fired. Their “crime” being that of having a conscience and a moral compass.

More

Advertisements

TS Radio: Abolishing Probate w/John Leckrone, Brian Kinter, Luanne Fleming

1 Comment

Join us this evening July 2, 2018 at 6:00 pm CST!

More

Caution! Predators at work! Professional guardians in America

Leave a comment

painy Join us this evening at 7:00 pm CST! More

Unconstitutional laws and the courts

Leave a comment

 

“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it..

Consider this opinion of the Supreme Court:

“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.”

“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it..

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.

An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.

Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”  Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256)

Protectionism is not a dirty word

Leave a comment

Back in the Old West, when the wagon trains were attacked someone had the good sense to yell, “Circle the wagons!” which is probably the best example I can give for advocating protectionism.  It isn’t a dirty word.  It isn’t the attack of the commies, the pinko’s, the socialists, the Marxists, the any ‘ists” that litter the language of those who seek to secure for them selves some safe haven in the current global roiling or those who anticipate profiting while destroying the lives of so many others.  Welcome to globalism.

 

Whether Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal, right or left or fence riding in the middle, we have a total lack of representation in either house of congress and a new president who has made it plain that he intends to continue us on the same path of destruction as the previous president.

 

We are a country whose own government has declared war on us.  We need to circle the wagons.  We are under attack, not from some vague and undefined terrorist group, but from those who swore to represent us; those we elected to speak for us in government. 

 

Our [federal] government was incorporated in 1871.  That’s a fact.  As a result, codes and statutes were enacted; that’s a fact too.  Then we got [administrative] courts to administer codes and statutes to enable the government to avoid constitutional protections and inalienable rights for the free and sovereign citizens of the states. 

 

In 1913 under the Federal Reserve Act, our national treasury was abolished along with the Treasury Secretary’s cabinet position.  All our revenues from any source have been deposited in the World Bank and administered by the International Monetary Fund since that time.  The Treasury Secretary then became a [governor] who works as liaison between this private banking cartel known as IMF and the US government [operating as a corporation.] 

 

Soon after this came the creation of agencies and these agencies were in 1946 under the Administrative Procedures Act, given “rule-making” authority.  This just means that congress ceded its constitutional authority to make laws to unelected bureaucracies who proceeded to conduct themselves as isolated and unaccountable mini-dictatorships.

 

Conducting the country’s in-house business in this manner allowed the government to implement laws (rules) which many times would have resulted in political suicide had they been introduced as legislation and by-pass those pesky constitutional provisions again. 

 

During the Nixon administration we got a highly touted program called “fast track”.  Supposedly, there were trade deals and other highly suspicious instruments that were so pressing the president needed uncontrolled and unaccountable authority to enter into them simply on his own; no congressional oversight, no adherence to the constitution.  The corporate US government was suddenly kicked into high gear but of course no one mentioned this little known change in the character of the federal government.

 

The United States of America a.k.a. Then United States, is listed on Dunn & Bradstreet along with every alphabet agency ever created and the Supreme Court of the United States.  Of course, “we the people” are not. 

 

Fast track went on unabated through Ford, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2.  It finally was ended in 2006.  But the damage was done and congress didn’t end this program until it was abundantly clear that our sovereignty had been so compromised by illegal trade agreements, unregulated financial systems, and corporate raiding and pandering, there was nothing left to sell off, trade off or give away. 

 

Our manufacturing base has been dismantled and millions of jobs lost.  We have nothing to sell, nothing to trade.  Supposedly we are now a “service based economy” which simply means about the only jobs we can get are those paying minimum wage with no future.  It seems it never occurs to those who promote this insult to American workers that if we have no jobs, we have no money.  If we have no money……what services will we be buying?  Can you say “depression”? 

 

We are being driven to the edge of a cliff.  It has taken many generations and lots of future planning and I suppose in the thinking of some, it has taken far too long. 

 

We need to adopt a protectionist attitude if we are to survive in any form even remotely resembling the country we once thought we had.  The illegal trade agreements need to be scrapped.  Corporate influence and access to our government needs to end and every person currently holding a seat in either house of congress needs to be booted out.  We need to start over with a clear message that America is first and foremost.

 

Protectionism is not a dirty word.  It is the only way we can survive.  We have had our economy imploded intentionally, our rights stripped under false pretenses, our borders left unsecured by those who see the influx of slave labor as something to be desired, and a congress now intent on subjecting us totally to unconstitutional and non-US regulations and laws.

 

We are under attack.  If someone doesn’t call for the wagons to be circled soon, we may as well just cut the mules loose and throw our hands up in surrender.

 

© 2009 Marti Oakley

 

States fight back against NAIS

6 Comments

 

 deesdeocbirds

In what can only be nothing more than a last ditch effort to eradicate all family farms and ranches, USDA has been caught repeatedly misrepresenting the voluntary National Animal Identification System and many states and groups are fighting back.

Without any approval or oversight from congress (none being needed as USDA operates as a self –regulating agency) USDA launched the NAIS with the usual bleating about [national security].  This threat was identified as the possibility that some rampant terrorist might somehow sneak some bio weapon into the country and infect a cow or corn field with some disease no doubt developed while hiding out in a cave somewhere on the other side of the world.  I suppose its possible considering how insecure our ports of entry are. 

More than likely, any attack of a bio weapons nature will come from one of the hundreds of bio labs now operating right here at home.  The US is the most prolific producer of bio weapons in the world and has created and designed some of the most lethal biological weapons ever to have been cultivated. 

Using the usual scare tactics of terrorist attacks, NAIS was launched with one goal in mind: eradicating family farms and ranches and establishing the complete takeover of all food producing lands and animals by huge multi-national corporations.  Instrumental in this takeover is the designation of PREMISES ID, rather than property ownership.

Defining Premises within the law

Premises, signifies a formal part of a deed; and it is made to designate an estate.

Estates:  Lands and tenements when generally called premises, or when particularly spoken of as, the premises, will be sold without reserve.

Conveyancing:  That part in the beginning of a deed, in which are set forth the names of the parties, with their titles and additions, and in which are recited such deeds, agreements, or matters of fact, as are necessary to explain the reasons upon which the contract then entered into is founded;

 and it is here also the consideration on which it is made, is set down, and the certainty of the thing granted. The technical meaning of the premises in a deed is every thing which precedes the habendum.   (http://www.lectlaw.com/

Ha`ben´dum    (hå`bĕn´dŭm) n. 1. (Law) That part of a deed which follows the part called the premises, and determines the extent of the interest of estate granted. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Habendum

Premises ID when viewed as a conveyance, could be construed to mean voluntarily abandoning what you owned.  You convey control of your property by signing up for Premises ID, voluntarily abandoning your control of the property and subjecting the property to the newly acquired control of the government.  Simply put:  you just gave away your property and any rights to control or use that property as YOU see fit.  At this point, legally, the property is no longer property but rather a premises and can be sold and controlled by someone other than you without reserve.

Premises signifies a formal part of a deed as mentioned above.  To designate is to name or entitle and to create an estate.  A premises has no protection under the United States Constitution and allows no exclusive rights of ownership.  Once you have signed onto PREMISES ID, you have put your property into a state of legal limbo and have agreed to the new status as nothing more than a tenant farmer or sharecropper.  Of course you will still have to make the mortgage payments until they take it from you.

Animals belong to the owner only so long as the owner retains possession of them.  Once you enter into the National Animal Identification System, you no longer legally own the animals.  They are no longer under your control, but rather under the control of the USDA. 

 

The USDA uses the term [stakeholder] to identify those who own animals, implying under the statutes and codes you are a third party interest until the legal owner can be determined.  No doubt in an administrative court which administers codes and statutes, not constitutional law. [you could not access a civil, constitutionally controlled court]

UN policy of STAMPING OUT/Agenda 21 rules for controlling access to food supplies and sources.

Using the UN Agenda 21 rules the USDA has adopted, there is no requirement for the USDA to vaccinate or to quarantine sick animals.  In fact, they don’t even have to prove there is a real threat to the animal population, or to substantiate that any disease is present or a threat prior to stamping out entire animal populations in a six mile area surrounding the claimed infection or disease.  The only requirement of the NAIS is that USDA follow UN Agenda 21 guidelines and eradicate all animal life in that area.   That means every fish, bird, dog, cat, cow, horse, deer, raccoon etc……every living thing is killed in its tracks. 

This isn’t about food safety, animal safety or national security:  this is about food access and control.

How they get away with it

1946 Federal Administrative Procedures Act.   The Administrative Procedures Act is the law which allows US Federal Agencies to create the rules and regulations they can then enforce.  This Act is a subversion of constitutional government and should be repealed.  It was another case of congress ceding its authority to a non-elected agency allowing the construction of codes and statutes and avoiding constitutional provisions and laws.

Using regulations they themselves created, in essence creating laws in abeyance of congress, the USDA can also amend any of these regulations and rules at will and at any point can rewrite their own laws.  http://www.archives.gov/federalregister/laws/administrative-procedure/

NAIS violates the 1st, 4th, 5th, and the 14th Amendments, suspending and substantially violating the rights of private citizens without so much as a hearing in congress, not that it would do any good.  Congress has shown itself consistently to support the most un-American and anti-constitutional policies and laws ever foisted on the American public and neither party is a protector of constitutional rights.

Its difficult to know that any time we are dealing with our own government or its agencies, we must constantly be on guard for hidden agendas, the hiding of hostile intent, or the practice of [altered functions].  This means that although the thing being promoted may have a good and beneficial purpose if applied as it is marketed, an altered function which is hidden, destructive or implemented with malice will be the reality.

Kudos, to all of you out there fighting this battle to keep government from controlling our land and animals and our right to chose the foods we want to consume.

© 2008 Marti Oakley

 

 

http://www.nonais.org/

Website devoted to fighting NAIS. Technical Documents section:  [Cooperative Agreements] that the USDA has with each State  and full text of NAIS directive.

 

Other resources:

http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p141.htm

http://www.tofga.org/

http://www.farmandranchfreedom.org/

info@picfa.org 

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/

http://libertyark.net/

http://arkansasanimalproducers.8k.com/

http://www.vicfa.net/

www.dogpolitics.com/my_weblog/2007/06/mary-zanoni-of-.html

www.farmandfood.org/newscommentary/articles_past/News_apr06.htm

 

%d bloggers like this: