Home

SCENARIO OF NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY

5 Comments

Author: OldReb

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Doom and gloom are appearing with increased frequency in U.S. and global financial writings but specific details of a potential economic catastrophe are never given. Let us speculate on what could happen in the United States.

Is a view into an economic catastrophe available ?

ANSWER: Sure, that is easy. Read what has happened to Greece and Argentina. William Blum, John Perkins, and Chossudovsky give many more examples. Bank deposits have been seized; pensions have been wiped out; jobs have been terminated; real estate and assets are selectively confiscated; the economy crashes; national assets are sold at fire-sale prices to financiers; financiers must approve every government action; etc. The same New York City parties, and their proxies, are repeatedly involved.

How might it be handled in the U.S. ?

ANSWER: The Federal Reserve Bank of New York City will handle it. They have exclusive handling of funds to redeem Treasury securities—as a fiscal agent for the government. They will select who gets funds which the government has available. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3.

Who will benefit from the crash?

ANSWER: Primary Dealers currently receive >$10 trillion annually for redeeming Treasury securities. Some of them were involved in creating the Federal Reserve. The concept that they hold ownership of the Board of Governors, in a closely held corporation that does not have to file with the SEC, should not be overlooked. Furtive acts abound in the creation of the Fed. Their derivatives creations have obtained super-priority status in bankruptcy. More

H. R. 75: To end membership of the United States in the United Nations.

2 Comments

new-logo25 Marti Oakley

 “No member of the Armed Forces of the United States may serve under the command of the United Nations.”

__________________________________________________________

There are few of us commoners out here who have not come to the realization that the United States involvement in the United Nations is detrimental to our continued existence as a free and sovereign nation.  There is not one action, law, or mandate, not one unlawfully and fictionally created federal agency or program that does not have its roots in the United Nations.  The sole intent of the UN with regards to the United States, is the dismantling and deconstruction of our sovereignty and our subjugation to world government.

This bill was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs.  It will never see the light of day if we do not pressure the political mafia in the District of Criminals to act upon it.  In all likelihood they will never acknowledge this bill.  But those of us fighting back against this “one world government” movement coming out of the UN need to make ourselves heard.

This bill will not fix it all, but it sure would be a good start in the right direction!

***********************************************************************************************  More

Constitutional Sheriffs event in Grant Pass

4 Comments

Hosted by Sheriff Gil Gilbertson on September 22, 2012

Attached is a petition that folks can sign in support of Sheriff Lopey then mailed to him at his office: http://www.co.sisqjustice.ca.us/contact.htm

…as his speech follows.

Also, the “Solemn Compacts ~ Statehood and Sovereignty” event will take place in Reno October 7th thru 9th…If interested in attending, contact Rae soon: More

REJECT the “Law Of the Sea Treaty” (LOST)

18 Comments

American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC) PO Box 1682 Dept Code 5792-n-am Bellevue, WA 98009-1682

REJECT the “Law Of the Sea Treaty” (LOST)

The United Nations wants the power to impose taxes on Americans and take away our sovereign rights.

Remember a little thing called the Boston Tea Party, leading up to the Revolutionary War? It happened because Americans have never taken kindly to taxation without representation – or to having our sovereignty stolen by foreign powers.

Well, the United Nations is at it again — and this time, they may actually succeed in imposing TAXES directly on the American people! WE CANNOT LET THIS HAPPEN!

Select Here to send YOUR “Blast Faxes” to ALL U.S. Senators AT ONCE, demanding   that they REJECT passage of the anti-American “Law Of the Sea” Treaty!

This outrageous treaty must NOT be ratified!

U.S. adherence to this treaty would entail history’s biggest and most unwarranted voluntary transfer of wealth AND surrender of sovereignty. LOST, which was a product of the Left/Soviet/unaligned movement agenda of the 1960s and 1970s, created the International Seabed Authority (ISA). ISA is a new supranational organization with unprecedented powers:

  • The power to regulate seven-tenths of the world’s surface area;
  • The power to levy international taxes;
  • The power to impose production quotas (for deep-sea mining, oil production, etc);
  • The power to regulate ocean research and exploration;
  • The power to create a multinational court system to render and enforce its judgments!

LOST was drafted BEFORE — and without regard to — the War on Terror, and what the United States must do to wage that war successfully.

As a result, U.S. national security interests will be severely undermined by several of the Treaty’s provisions:

The sorts of at-sea interdiction efforts central to American security efforts would be prohibited. Communist China has already been citing the Treaty to object to PSI maritime interdiction and boarding of vessels suspected of weapons of mass destruction or terrorism ties;

The treaty effectively prohibits two functions vital to American security: intelligence-collection in, and submerged transit of, territorial waters;

Mandatory information-sharing will afford U.S. enemies data that could be used to facilitate attacks on this country (for example, detailed imagery of underwater access routes and off-shore hiding places);

Obligatory technology transfers will equip actual or potential adversaries with sensitive and militarily useful equipment and know-how (such as anti-submarine warfare technology).

We must stop this treaty. Select Here NOW To Fax the U.S. Senate

The Treaty fails to address, let alone offer solutions to, the most dangerous flashpoints for military conflict facing the world. In fact, Communist China is using its own “unique” interpretation of this Treaty to justify its assertion of control over the strategic South China Sea!

LOST is a prime example of the way left-wing Democrats would like the world to be ordered and run. It is NOT consistent with American conservative governing principles and values — or, more importantly, this country’s VITAL INTERESTS.

This treaty MUST BE STOPPED!

Remember, President Reagan first REJECTED the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) in 1982. The U.S. Senate is now being asked to consent to ratification of exactly the same treaty Mr. Reagan found unacceptable!

LOST was a bad idea then; it is an INTOLERABLE one now. The Senate must NOT allow it to become binding on the United States.

Patriotic Americans across the country need to take action IMMEDIATELY. The Senate Republican leadership must be warned that quick action on LOST will further alienate a conservative base that is ALREADY upset about recent GOP immigration and spending policy errors.

Please donate to AmeriPAC Help us STOP the Law Of the Sea Treaty!

The conservative priority agenda items (social security, tax reduction, spending restraint, etc). will be in danger of failing if the Senate becomes bitterly divided over a non-essential issue like LOST. All U.S. Senators must be contacted IMMEDIATELY and urged to oppose LOST — or at least not to commit to its ratification until hearings have been held to lay out the case for rejecting this anti-American treaty.

HELP US STOP THIS TERRIBLE TREATY!

If we can FLOOD the offices of all of the U.S. Senators, demanding that they REJECT the Law of the Sea Treaty, we CAN stop this thing dead in its tracks. But we need YOUR help.

Select Here to send YOUR “Blast Faxes” to ALL U.S. Senators AT ONCE, demanding   that they REJECT passage of the anti-American “Law Of the Sea” Treaty!

Defend America, Alan M. Gottlieb Chairman, AmeriPAC

If you prefer to send a check, please mail to:

American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC) PO Box 1682 Dept Code 5792-n-am Bellevue, WA 98009-1682

Paid for by AmeriPAC, a federally-authorized and qualified multi candidate political action committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee. Contributions to AmeriPAC will be used in connection with federal elections. Maximum contribution per individual per calendar year is $5,000. Contributions from foreign nationals and corporations are prohibited. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Copyright © 2012 AmeriPAC, All Rights Reserved.

Constitutional Sheriff Tony DeMeo

2 Comments

July 30, 2010

by Cassandra Anderson

MORPHcity

In this 3-part video interview with Tony DeMeo, Sheriff of Nye County, Nevada, he explains that he is a Constitutional Sheriff and that authority for public office holders is derived from the people. He tells the story about how he used the Constitution as his foundation in the saga of Nye County rancher Wayne Hage’s disputes over encroachments by the federal government. While Wayne Hage’s case centered around property rights in federally managed lands, Sheriff Tony DeMeo’s example is relevant for everyone to understand the power of local government, the importance of following the Constitution and upholding the Tenth Amendment (states’ rights and sovereignty).

Wayne Hage, the author of “Storm Over Rangelands, Private Rights in Federal Lands” owned the Pine Creek cattle ranch in Nye County. Wayne Hage wrote his book after suffering illegal cattle seizures by armed federal agents and chronicled the history of how the robber baron bankers and railroad magnates monopolized the western states over 100 years ago. Hage wrote that the northern core financiers were aware that there are two ways to monopolize any resource, “One, get all of it for yourself that you can; two, keep anybody else from getting what you can’t.” Public Lands and National Forests were created along with restrictive regulations, using environmental protection as the excuse.  More

2010 Census Most Personally Invasive Ever

34 Comments

Gary Rea (c)copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

_____________________________________

In 1790, the first census was taken in the United States, just three years after the ratification of the Federalist’s Constitution, which mandated the census. Prior to this, under our original constitution, the Articles of Confederation, no such requirement existed.

The 1790 census asked only for the number of people in one’s household, their ages (which was reported as an age range, not a specific age), their sex and little else. The purpose of the census, at that time, was to enumerate the population in order to estimate the number of representatives each state should be allowed in Congress. Period.

Since then, the census has become increasingly demanding of personal information, though the transition has been so gradual as not to cause much alarm among the people. Also, it has been, until now, completely voluntary.

That voluntary aspect of the census stops with 2010. Not only will you be asked many more questions about yourself, your family and your home, but you will be required to answer every question. If you don’t, a census taker will come to your door to get the missing information. If they are not successful in obtaining it, they will ask your adjacent neighbors for the information (good luck with that, these days, since most people don’t know their neighbors’ names, let alone anything else about them).

If the census taker still can’t get the questions answered, More

Dallas Tea Party Invites Olbermann look-a-likes at MSNBC

Leave a comment

//
Looks like poor Keith bit one this time.  I personally attend Tea Partys, sovereignty meetings, Constitution gatherings and support Oathkeepers.  I’m not young, or Republican or even Democrat for that matter. And I surely was not in a crowd of all white people.  More

Texas jumps on the sovereignty band wagon

3 Comments

First, see it for yourself.

Gov. Perry Backs Resolution Affirming Texas’ Sovereignty Under 10th Amendment

HCR 50 Reiterates Texas’ Rights Over Powers Not Otherwise Granted to Federal Government
AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry today joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of states’ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitutio

BTC OPINION/ EDITORIAL

While HCR 50 is the idealogical new darling legislation of the 81st session, it has been gathering dust in the State Affairs office. No legislators were available for comment today at the Captiol due to Good Friday. There has bee no legislative action on HCR 50 since February, 23 2009; the date it was filed. The show and tell we witnessed on Thursday is a heavy cloud. We can wait until Tuesday for any word on the rain.

There are 69 co-sponsors, 4 sponsors and the author, Rep. Brandon Creighton. Amid the approbation of 76 legislators is: the Vice Chair of the Calendars Committee, 6 co-sponsors on the Calendars committee, 5 State Affairs Committee members – 2 of which are also on the Calendar’s committee. With the level of collaborative and incestuous support – why hasn’t HCR 50 actually passed by now?

That is something you will have to ask your Texas Legislators.

To track HCR 50 visit:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HCR50


Posted By Beat The Chip to Beat The Chip at 4/10/2009 04:43:00 PM

Campaign for Liberty…….www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

1 Comment

RADIO SHOW REMINDER:  
 
NEXT SHOW – (THIS FRIDAY) at 1:00PM
 

This week I will be talking about the many things that are going on in America today that threaten our individual freedoms, liberties and our nation’s sovereignty. People are encouraged to call it.
 
If you have specific questions, on this or any other subject, please call the show whilce it is on the air (646-200-0326) and or email your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.
 
Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.
 
 
If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: john@NYCampaignForLiberty.com .
 
Regards,
John
 
American Politics with John Wallace
www.JohnWallaceShow.com

PS: Please visit our OnLine newspaper  www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com  

We are still looking for authors and reporters.
_______________________________________
John Wallace
“For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty”
New York Campaign for Liberty
Chatham, New York
http://www.NYCampaignForLiberty.com

 

McCotter: “Sovereign Wealth Funds Diminish Economic Liberty”

Leave a comment

 Thursday, March 06, 2008

 

This is not protectionism of anything except Americans’ liberty, prosperity, sovereignty, and security.”

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI-11), House Republican Policy Chairman, recently spoke on the House floor about the threat of sovereign wealth funds  The text of McCotter’s remarks are below:

 “Mr. Speaker, I would like today to discuss an issue that is on the horizon that could very well affect the economic freedom of Americans, especially their family’s prosperity and happiness. It is an issue that I would also like to thank the chairman of the Financial Services Committee, Representative Frank, and the ranking member of the subcommittee, Representative Kanjorski, for bringing forward.

“The issue I am talking about is the issue of sovereign wealth funds. Many people will question what is a sovereign wealth fund? The answer is very simple. A sovereign wealth fund is a fund that is controlled by a foreign government that then invests into the private market of the United States.

“Many people, especially those within my own party, disturbingly think sovereign wealth funds are a wonderful way to inject capital into the United States. The reality is these are very dangerous instrumentalities of foreign nations and would allow for the potential interference of these foreign nations in our domestic affairs, and not only within our economic sphere.

“One of the reasons I joined the Republican Party was because I oppose socialism, communism; and I wanted to advance the cause of liberty. A sovereign wealth fund denies all of those. Again, a sovereign wealth fund is controlled by a government. Those who recall economics can understand that when a government buys an asset from the private sector, when the government owns it, the product or service has been “nationalized.” This is the root of socialism. Government buys something in the private sector, socialism gets bigger, free markets and free enterprise and free people get diminished. This is the root problem of a sovereign wealth fund. It will diminish the economic liberty of individuals in the face of governments that are trying to control free enterprise.

“We should not have this occurring in the United States of America, the bastion of free enterprise conducted by free people.

“The second problem I have with sovereign wealth funds grows from the first: a foreign country controls this fund. This is not protectionism of anything except Americans’ liberty, prosperity, sovereignty, and security.

“The Communist Chinese have one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world. As they continue to tell us, although few people seem to understand that they are serious, they remain communists. The communist sovereign wealth fund from China comes in and buys private assets in the United States. Those government assets are now socialized; and, again, your freedom, liberty, prosperity, and security are diminished and there is a huge problem with this in the hands of the Communist Chinese.

“In addition, whereas in the free market private investment funds have to raise capital voluntarily from individuals and then make rational decisions based upon the profit motive, a sovereign government’s wealth fund is allowed to take and spend and invest. They spend and invest that which they take from their people. They have no accountability to these citizens, and they can invest for a political motive.

“These entities of sovereign wealth funds are antithetical to private sector free market investment. And, again, when they are forced to operate on a private sector profit motive, the sovereign wealth fund can operate on a political motive, which may or may not be in the long-term interests of the people of the United States.

“So for two reasons I would like to go on record immediately in my opposition to sovereign wealth funds in any nation’s hands being invested in the United States and socializing our private sector assets. And I would like to also especially emphasize my abject contempt for nations that are opposed to the United States’ continued existence as a bastion of liberty being able to buy up influence within the United States based upon a solely political motive, and that political motive is not in the people’s best interests.

“So to my fellow Republicans I would ask them to remember why they are Republicans, to remember that we have the duty to advance the economic liberty of Americans and to protect and preserve their liberty and prosperity and security, and ask them to reassess these sovereign wealth funds. Because no matter how much money they inject into our economy to socialize private sector assets, the cost we are going to pay to the long-term vitality of our free people is too high a price to tender to the very enemies of our existence.

– These remarks were delivered on Thursday, March 6, 2008 on the floor of the U.S. Capitol.

###

 

 

 

Charles Key on Radio Free Oklahoma 1/2/09

Leave a comment

Announcement from axiomuse:

http://axiomuse.wordpress.com  

Radio Free Oklahoma 1/2/09 Interviews Oklahoma State Rep. Charles Key

December 30, 2008 ·

 Charles Key will be a guest  Radio Free Oklahoma 1/2/09.  He is scheduled for the first portion of the show and will give his thoughts on the Tenth Amendment Resolution, anti-Real ID legislation and current political situation in Oklahoma and tell us about the “Citizens Assembly for Oklahoma Sovereignty” to be held on 1/2/09 in OKC beginning at 7pm.

The show is now broadcast on FOUR FM stations in Oklahoma [107.1FM – OKC / 91.1 FM – Tulsa / 93.5 – Durant / 95.3 FM – Guthrie ]
along with our flagship station on Austin, TX – 90.1 FM and one in the west side of Madison, WI. 

http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2008/12/30/important-notice/

 www.ruleoflawradio.com

From The Oklahoma Rebellion by Walter E. Williams

Federal usurpation goes beyond anything the Constitution’s framers would have imagined. James Madison, explaining the constitution, in Federalist Paper 45, said, “The powers delegated … to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. … The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people.” Thomas Jefferson emphasized that the states are not “subordinate” to the national government, but rather the two are “coordinate departments of one simple and integral whole. … The one is the domestic, the other the foreign branch of the same government.”  [. . . ]One of the more disgusting sights for me to is to watch a president, congressman or federal judge take an oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, when in reality they either hold constitutional principles in contempt or they are ignorant of those principles.
 
State efforts, such as Oklahoma’s, create a glimmer of hope that one day Americans and their elected representatives will realize that the federal government is the creation of the states. A bit of rebellion by officials in other states will speed that process along
 
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/article.aspx?Rsrcid=32534

Hope you will all listen and call in!

Radio Free Oklahoma”      Fridays 6-8pm CST

 www.ruleoflawradio.com

 

Oklahoma still fighting for Sovereignty

Leave a comment

For Immediate Release
12/23/08
Citizens to Assemble in Support of Bipartisan Legislative Efforts to Protect Oklahomans from the Federal Collection, Sharing and Control of Personal Data.
Oklahoma City–January 3rd there will be “Citizens Assembly for Oklahoma Sovereignty” sponsored by OK-SAFE, R3PUBLICANS, and the Constitutional Alliance along to support the Tenth Amendment Resolution and to show that Oklahoma citizens firmly reject The Real ID Act of 2005 and similar proposals to use personal information or biometrics to enroll Americans in a national identification plan. This bipartisan event is open to all residents of Oklahoma who wish to retain their rights and freedoms as guaranteed by the US Constitution and Bill of Rights should attend this assembly on Jan 3rd at 7 pm to be held at Character First, 520 W. Main in OKC. 
State Representative Charles Key and Senator Constance Johnson will be special guest speakers at the assembly and will inform attendees about current proposals before the State Legislature that would protect Oklahoma citizens’ private data from being exposed.  Several Bills have been submitted by Oklahoma legislators that specifically address the collection, sharing and retention of personal information and biometrics that put all Americans at risk such as the REAL ID ACT.

The Tenth Amendment Resolution HJR 1003, authored by Representative Key, presents fair notice to Washington that Oklahoma will not be intimidated into relinquishing legal authority, responsibility or jurisdiction over matters reserved to the state as declared Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution which reserves all powers not granted to the federal government to the state or the people.

Mark Lerner, leading expert on the biometrics industry, founding member of the Constitutional Alliance will be present to give an update on the latest news regarding parallel efforts to resist untenable national/global ID schemes.  The Constitutional Alliance is a non-partisan coalition of Americans committed to preserving state and national sovereignty and the unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. They have been working with legislators, officials and citizens nationwide to educate them about the grave threat posed to our fundamental freedoms that the misuse of biometric identifiers pose and have crafted model legislation designed to stop the national/global ID plan. 
  
For more information or to RSVP, please contact;
Kaye Beach
R3PUBLICAN Activist
405-818-3224
ladyaxiom@yahoo.com

The wizards of warfare

Leave a comment

 By James P. Harvey

 (c) 2008

 

Washington’s wizards of warfare already have us trapped in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now, rather than trying to get free of those snares, they are doing their very best to add Iran and the wolves in Russia to this insanity.

 

Can anyone with anything more than excrement for brains not see their deliberate plan to destroy America; and they are sadistically toying with our country during the last, exquisitely painful hours of her life?

 

If the reader is so uninformed as to be offended by these accusations, let me add a few more to the list. Then, just maybe, a little bell will start ringing in your dysfunctional mind and you will turn off that electronic propagandist, cancel your news-paper, and start hunting for more reliable information.

 

For the time being, I will ignore all of the atrocities committed by previous administrations and concentrate on what the present war mongering traitors in all three branches of our government have done. Better yet, I will make it a test of your ignorance.

 

Are you aware that the so called Free Trade deals such as NAFTA are really Slave Trade deals because they allow corporations to move our manufacturing capability to other countries where the population is willing to work for slave wages, out source American jobs to other countries, and redistribute Americas wealth to other countries, which will bankrupt us and make us more controllable?

 

Are you aware that your so called president is negotiating with Canada and Mexico to form a North American Union, in preparation of a regional system of government that surrenders our Nations sovereignty, and Constitutional Republic?

 

Are you aware that Congress has allowed construction to begin on a Foreign owned super highway from Mexico to Canada that will have eminent domain over private property?

 

Are you aware that Congress has surrendered it’s authority to the executive branch, and therefore is guilty of treason?

 

Are you aware that our government is selling public services to foreign owned

companies?

 

Are you aware that the Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret the Constitution of the United States of America?

 

Are you aware that our government is under the control of International Bankers who are controlling corporations that are assuming control of the world’s economy?

 

Are you aware that the pharmaceutical and food industries are poisoning citizens in every nation?

 

Are you aware that the chemical industries have effectively assumed control through patents, of the seeds necessary to produce food?

 

Are you aware that not one single rich person in the entire world has the authority to finance a national, propagandist free, news-paper or TV station?

 

After realizing that few if any propagandized citizens would read this list, I have decided to put the burden of becoming knowledgeable citizens on the reader, where it belongs.

 

If you are smart enough to have realized I have a legitimate reason for my disgust with the majority of my fellow citizens, then the following is a list of sites and essay’s to continue your education, as they are much more articulate and gifted writers than I.

 

When, after becoming aware of what has been going on, and your concern for your children’s future is as heart-breaking as mine, please contact me at

 

WeThePeople@mchsi.com

 

James P. Harvey

READING LIST:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wood/patrickA.htm

 

http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancyA.htm

 

 

http://inpursuitoffreedom.blogspot.com/

http://nord.twu.net/acl/books.html

 

http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/

 

 

Make shortcuts to these sites, and after you have read their essays, go to the links they provide, buy the books they recommend, and reflect on this.

 

Not under any circumstances, can you justify giving up your, or my, freedom from a tyrannical government.

 

If somehow, you have received this letter from somewhere, and do not have a computer, please call me at 828-696-7100

 

Jim

National Survey Reveals Strong Opposition To North American Union

Leave a comment

APC News Release

For Immediate Release

Contact: Tom DeWeese, President
American Policy Center
70 Main Street, Suite 23
Warrenton, VA 20186
(540) 341-8911

National Survey Reveals Strong Opposition To North American Union

While President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada continue to deny that the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is the beginning of a North American Union, Americans around the nation are expressing their growing opposition to the scheme.

The American Policy Center, (APC) a grassroots activist organization located in suburban Washington, DC has just concluded a survey of one million American households. The survey, titled Do Americans Support a North American Union asked a series of questions concerning the SPP and the Trans Texas Corridor (TTC). The survey package also included a four-page report prepared by APC entitled NAU Fact Sheet”, providing details about the SPP, the TTC and how these programs are being implemented quietly, behind closed door meetings like the one just completed in New Orleans.

It is important to note that APC did not select households that might represent specific ideological positions. The chosen households represented neither conservative nor liberal positions. Instead the recipients were a wide verity of Americans who live in the direct path of the proposed Trans Texas/NAFTA Corridor, from Texas to Minnesota.

The questions on the survey were:

1. Have you heard of the Security and Prosperity Partnership?

58% of those responding said they had NOT heard of the SPP.

2. Do you think private corporations should have the power to enforce trade policy that may adversely affect our national sovereignty and independence?

This question relates directly to the establishment of Public/Private Partnerships between private corporations and government which grant no-compete clauses and Comprehensive Development Agreements (CDA) which provide guarantees by government to the corporations on investment returns. As such, projects like the TTC are not free enterprise but rather government-sanctioned monopolies. As APC explained this process in the survey, fully 95% of the recipients OPPOSED such policy.

3. Chapter 11 of the NAFTA Agreement states that, disputes over NAFTA-related issues will be heard in NAFTA courts superseding U.S. local, state and federal courts, including the Supreme Court. Question three asked,

Do you think this would be a threat to U.S. Sovereignty?

91% responded YES.

4. The SPP calls for expanding the U.S. security perimeter to include the borders of Canada and Mexico. Question 4 asked,

Do you think it would strengthen U.S. Security to expand our borders to the outer borders of Canada and Mexico?

87% of responders answered NO.

5. Do you think it will strengthen U.S. Border security to allow trucks from Mexico and Canada to travel, free of inspection, up a corridor which has been built and controlled by foreign corporations into the heartland of the United States?

Texas Department of Transportation has already signed a 50 year agreement with a Spanish company named Cintra to build the TTC. In September of 2007 the Bush Administration started a pilot project to allow Mexican trucks to cross the U.S. border without inspections and are free to travel inside the United States. Meanwhile, the Senate passed the 2008 omnibus spending bill that was clearly written and designed to put the breaks on the current pilot program, according to sponsor Senator Bryon Dorgan. Yet, the Bush Administration, under the leadership of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, continues the program, now in violation of federal law.

95% of responders to the APC survey OPPOSED the Mexican truck project.

6. Would you support efforts to replace the U.S. dollar with a common North American currency some call the “Amero?” Though denied by the Bush Administration, there has been much discussion in economic and academic circles about the creation of a North American currency much like the Euro. In October, 2007, during an appearance on the Larry King Show on CNN, former Mexican President Vicente Fox answered in the affirmative when King asked him about the creation of a united currency. In the May/June issue of the Council on Foreign Relations magazine Foreign Affairs, in an article entitled “The End of National Currency” economist Benn Steil said the dollar is a temporary currency.

92% of survey responders said NO, they would not support such a common North American currency.

7. Do you believe there should be public hearings and debate on this policy before it is allowed to move forward?

To date, there has been no congressional legislation, no congressional hearings and no congressional oversight concerning the establishment or operation of the SPP. No federal money has been officially allocated by Congress. No official authority has been provided for the creation of the SPP. Obviously, Americans feel it is wrong to make such significant changes in our national policy without open debate as 95% of survey respondents said YES, there should be debate and discussion.

8. Should the Bush Administration be allowed to move forward with its plans to crate a North American Community without Congressional approval? Again, the American people have shown they understand that it is Congress which decides such policy as they responded with a resounding 97% NO to this question.

9. Do you believe the United States should be harmonized or merged into a union with Mexico and Canada? The words most often used by the Administration concerning the SPP are, harmonize and integrate. The United States is a representative Republic; Mexico is a socialist government; and Canada is part of the British Crown. There are no grounds for harmonization unless drastic changes are made to the US judicial and financial system. 88% of survey responders said NO to harmonization with Mexico and Canada.

10. Finally, responders were asked to provide their own comments and thoughts on the SPP. The word most often used was Treason. Another said, I want no part of the social health care of Canada and I do not want to incorporate Mexico’s turmoil and poverty into our United States.  Many others said, I want secure borders, not easy traffic between the US, Canada and Mexico. Said another, Bush’s actions formulate a horrifying destruction of our proud nation. Stronger language was used by many more responders. Clearly Americans, once they learn about the SPP are strongly opposed.

However, once again this week (April 21-22) in yet another closed door SPP meeting in New Orleans, President Bush and his fellow heads of state from Mexico and Canada continue to deny the SPP is anything more than a dialogue among the three nations.

Yet, said Tom DeWeese, president of the American Policy Center, the Texas Department of Transportation signs an agreement with the Spanish company Cintra, containing no-compete clauses and guaranteed returns; as the Kansas City council loans $2.5 million to build the inland truck port called KC Smart Port; as the twenty SPP working groups continue to write policy; as the Mexican trucks roll over our borders; as high level meetings go on the Bush Administration dares to deny that ANYTHING is happening. Why? The responses to APC’s survey show why. When Americans understand the truth, they say NO in resounding numbers. Concluded DeWeese, clearly the American people are overwhelmingly opposed to the harmonization of North America. We just want our country — strong, independent and secure.

Click here to visit the American Policy Center website

 

SEND THIS MESSAGE TO AT LEAST TEN MORE PEOPLE! APC is now offering you a quick and easy way to multiply your efforts and help win more battles! Simply click here to send this APC Action Alert to up to TEN of your friends! Its fast, it’s easy and most of all, it’s extremely effective in KILLING OPPRESSIVE POLICIES!

 

 

Globalism…….The multi-national economy killing, scam

1 Comment

Globalization, although spoken about as an inevitabililty, is more a forced acceptance of multi-national corporate control of currencies, economies, and policies.  Acceptance of globalization and the assumption that it must happen if we are to survive is exactly the concept that will destroy us. 

The idea that closing manufacturing plants here and moving these operations to countries that have no wage or work standards would somehow be conducive to economic growth is most likely one of the greatest coups ever perpetrated on the American public.

And how many of you out there think that globalization and free and unbalanced trade without tarriff or taxes, without duties or levies, is benefiting anyone other than the globalist promoters?  

Too many times I receive emails from people who seem to believe that if you oppose unbalanced free trade….it must be because you are poor.  How arrogant!  It just might be that those who oppose unfair trade practices do so because they are proficient in math. 

Maybe they have figured out that with 3 million manufacturing jobs lost, our manufacturing base being almost non-existent now, our tax base dwindling, home foreclosures rising, homelessness rising, more people in poverty rising, food costs rising and average household incomes DROPPING……….the math of globalism just doesn’t work. That and we have little left to sell, to trade, or to negotiate with.

Our children are now asked in school if they think that global citizenship will be possible in their lifetime.  (The question is loaded. It plants that idea that global citzenship should be something to look forward to, rather than seeing it as a loss of national identity and sovereignty). 

The question that should be asked: 

Would you be willing to forfeit your freedom, civil rights and liberties and your sovereignty in favor of a global government under which you would have none of these things?  That’s the question that should be asked.

Globalism is nothing more than  a term used to describe the activites of multi-national corporations and the multi-national individuals who own them.  Trade is not conducted in order to secure the economy and viability of any country, but rather, to secure the wealth of individuals who believe that personal greed is far more important than national survival. 

This observation will most assuredly elicit more emails about how I just don’t want to see some other person become wealthy, and that I must be one of those people who missed the boat and am complaining. 

It is an amazing thing to me to correspond with people who seem not to know or to care that our country is being  taken apart and sold off to the highest bidder regardless of who they are.  The fact is, that nothing I own, no asset that I have of any kind is worth forfeiting this country.  More than wealth, I value America.  I have to wonder why others don’t?  When does greed become so overwhelming that it supercedes your loyalty and your allegiance to the US?

In my opinion, globalism is the new enemy.  It is a destroyer of jobs, of quality of life, of human rights and dignity.  It is the creed of greed taken to greater levels than we have ever witnessed before.

Marti Oakley

Open Letter To George Bush by Marti Oakley

4 Comments

I have a few things I would like to say to you but I know if I write these thoughts down in a letter and mail them to you I will most likely be put on a watch list at the very least and probably will be hounded by my local FBI for daring to speak out.  More than likely, if this open letter to you is printed…….I will end up on a list anyway.  Even knowing that, I am determined to have my say.  What follows is my take on you, your presidency and the damage you have done to our once beautiful country.

To begin:  I personally will consider it an act of treason against the people of the sovereign United States for you to continue to participate in, contribute to, or to in any way engage  in furthering the Security & Prosperity Partnership.  The idea that you have scheduled the next summit meeting for this anti-American agreement, in New Orleans in April, on American soil for the benefit of you and your corporate friends and crooks is more than an insult. It is a direct violation of the Logan Act and is nothing less than treason.

By the way:  nothing in our Constitution gives you the right to enter into agreements of any kind without calling it what it is…a treaty.  You don’t call it a treaty because that would mean congress would have oversight…..and you sure don’t want that!

The failure of any of your three Attorney’s General to secure our border with Mexico against this illegal colonization and immigration, is a direct result of your intentions to merge the US, Canada and Mexico into one big continental country. 

All three of your nefarious AG’s have failed to perform their duties as prescribed in the US Code mandating that it is their DUTY to secure our borders against any unlawful invasion.  They each failed to perform the duties of their office, and you have supported and encouraged this failure. 

I find it more than strange that we are now going to have to suffer the indignity of foreign military on our soil, against us…… and we can now send our military into other countries to attack their populations, but we can’t use our own military to secure that border.   

But this isn’t about foreign terrorists or mass illegal immigration is it?  This is about dismantling the Republic.  This is about coaxing and conning people into believing an imaginary enemy is at their door and that unless they give up everything this country was founded on, the boogey man will get them!  This is all about transforming a once great nation of free people into one of oppression and government control for the benefit of the select few.  This is about terrorizing the American public into compliance. It is the American people that you fear most of all.

Ordinary citizens are now “domestic combatants”, “domestic terrorists”.  Why?  Because they object to your un-American policies.  We have watch lists, no fly lists, specially designated nationals lists…black lists of all kinds.  And the names of American citizens who have never committed any crime are being added to these lists daily.  But for some reason we can’t find Osama.  We can’t locate and deport illegals back to their homes.  We can’t enforce immigration laws.  But we can sure run down American citizens and data mine every possible piece of information on them. 

Under the threat of another attack (you seem to be the only one threatening) our phone calls are listened to, our email is read, our web searches tracked, our snail mail opened and read, our personal business is tracked, our medical information is logged, our homes can be searched without warrant or warning, our assets frozen, and now HSD wants to enact REAL ID which is nothing more than a national ID which they are forbidden to ever establish according to their charter.  You want us chipped, bio-scanned, facially imprinted, fingerprinted, and you want us to go to a cashless system so that only those with the ID can conduct any transaction……and only if you say its ok. 

The stage is set isn’t it?  The Executive Orders granting yourself expanded and unconstitutional powers, the signing statements putting yourself above the law, the presidential directives laying the groundwork for martial law and suspension of the Constitution and Bill of Rights; the FEMA camps for dissidents… these things are all in place and just waiting for you to declare a national emergency……and to declare yourself as perpetual dictator. 

In all of this, the greatest disappointment has been the refusal of congress on either side of the isle to act to defend the people of the United States from you.  I personally believe that you, Cheney, Rice, and many others in this illegitimate administration pose a greater threat to the safety of this nation than any foreign terrorist ever could. 

It is you and your cronies who have done the damage.  It is you who have started wars of aggression, who lies pathologically, who seems intent on destroying our nation.  It is you who subverts our laws, disregards our Constitution and who is intent on taking away our liberties.  No foreign terrorist could have done this. 

It is you and the terrorists in your administration who pose the greatest threat.  It is you we need to fear.  And we need to treat you as we would any other terrorist:

You should be held without communication at a secret prison and tortured until you said whatever we wanted you to say whether it was true or not.  We need to seize all your assets and incarcerate your wife and children.  And don’t think you would have any rights either or that you will get a fair trial.  After all, we’re not going to tell you what you’re charged with or allow you to see any evidence that we might have against you and you will not be allowed to mount a defense of any kind. 

In the end, if we haven’t water boarded, electrocuted, or beaten you to death, or permanently screwed up your mental faculties with the use of psychotropic drugs that we may use to experiment on you, we may let you go.  But then again….maybe not.   The dogs may be hungry.  And besides, the usual term of incarceration for terrorism is life without parole if you don’t die “accidentally” while in prison.  I have to wonder if those laws and provisions sound quite so good to you now?

I would like to think that the election in November will bring a much needed reversal of the illegitimate laws and corruption that have defined your administration.  But, I know this won’t happen.  Regardless of who supposedly wins that election, that person will simply continue the destruction you have begun.  And I also know that no one will be allowed to take that office without first swearing that they will continue what you have started.  (We don’t have hacker enabled electronic voting machines for nothing.  I guess you would know more about those than I would.)

Knowing that you are a megalomaniac and totally without conscience, I am sure you think that history will report you as some great leader with a vision.  I think history, if it isn’t censored to a great extent, will report you as the worst president ever in our history.  If not the worst, then assuredly the most despised.  The only person I can think of which will be held in even less regard would be Cheney. 

Marti Oakley

These are just some of my observations.  I have many more and would gladly share them with you……but I know your aversion to having to actually deal with or communicate with the non-elite.  That, and if you cared what I or anyone else out here thought, none of this would be happening anyway.

   

Nothing less than treason

Leave a comment

In what is nothing less than a step towards martial law and the North American Union, U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renaurt signed an agreement with Canadian Air Force Lt-Gen. Marc Dumais  which is nothing less than a treaty, called the Civil Assistance PlanThis so-called agreement (treaty) signals the intended use of the military of Canada on U.S. soil, against U.S. Citizens. 

The flowery language in the public announcement from United States Northern Command appears to imply that without the assistance of Canadian troops, our military might not be able to efficiently respond in the event of a national emergency.  Supposedly, if we have a flood, hurricane, forest fire, earthquake or another terrorist attack additional forces that are more flexible and adaptive are needed and these forces are, for some reason, not to be found within the 1.5 million in our own military.

Our military isn’t supposed to respond in the first place, much less with the assistance of foreign soldiers.  We have made similar agreements (treaty’s) with other nations including Germany and Mexico. 

It isn’t a national disaster or attack from terrorists that the two governments are preparing for.  It is the anticipated civil revolts resulting from the intent to merge the U.S, Canada and Mexico; and the intentional creation of a food shortage over this year along with the forced collapse of our economies that has them worried.  What if the peasants revolt?

What concerns me most in this treasonous pact are those terms, flexible and adaptive.  I can’t imagine any military more flexible and adaptive than our own….so what could this really mean?

In the context of the North American Union, it means soldiers who wouldn’t be firing on family and friends…on their countrymen.  The subconscious sense of national identity would allow Canadian soldiers to view us as an enemy.  That sense would not likely include natural inhibitions our own military might have about attacking U.S. citizens under a declaration of martial law.  The reverse would be likely for the U.S. military on Canadian soil.

We have a little known law called “The Logan Act”.  This act makes it a felony for any person to enter into agreements or treaty’s, or even conversations with foreign nations that in any way work to undermine the United States as a nation.  It is only with permission from those with the authority to do so, that any discussions or meetings can occur….and these still may not include anything that undermines the laws or sovereignty of the U.S..

I would like to know who gave Gen. Renaurt the permission to enter into this agreement with foreign nations?  Whomever, that person was, is guilty of a felony as is the General.

Our constitution says that treaty’s are the law of the land.  These must be adhered to.  But, treaty’s also must abide by the sovereign laws of the U.S.  They also must pass both houses of congress and be approved before being adopted.  Which is exactly why “treaty” is never used in these illegal pacts and the word “agreement” is substituted.  This bypasses congress altogether and allows unhindered assaults on our sovereignty. 

 These “agreements” are illegal and unconstitutional regardless of who initiated them.  There are no provisions in our Constitution for such agreements.  This would include the North American Free Trade Agreement.   The Central America Free Trade Agreement.  The Free Trade Area of the America’s Agreement, and a host of other agreements that are destroying our economy and forfeiting our sovereignty. 

This brings me back to a question that seems to run through my mind daily.  Where the hell is our congress?  Whether Democrat or Republican not one of them has made any effort to end this corruption of our laws and of our Constitution.  And, not one of these bloated politicians has spoken one word about this treasonous pact.  Dead silence.

Oh! Except for Ron Paul, he of course, has.  Well…. there’s one in a row.

 

Don’t think they are worried about this either.  If we protest too much they can always vote themselves retro-active immunity from any prosecution…..and then call on Canada’s military to silence us.

Marti Oakley  Copyright 2008 

 Resource: http://www.northcom.mil/News/2008/021408.html

Canadians Oppose the SPP / North American Union

4 Comments

Conservative Roundtable from Ottowa, Canada.

North American Union

Security & Prosperity Partnership

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7ZDNHf30pI

%d bloggers like this: