Home

The Green Party: A Third Political Party for Disillusioned Altruists – and it Refuses to Accept Corporate Money!

1 Comment

new logoDuty to Warn:
kohlsBy Gary G. Kohls, MD

 

 

News release: The Green Party of Minnesota will be holding its annual meeting in Duluth this Saturday, June 13, 2015, 11 am – 3 pm. Location: Coppertop church , 230 East Skyline Parkway.
Most Americans have their own simplistic methods of evaluating candidates for political office during America’s seemingly perpetual campaign seasons, but truly progressive proponents of true democracy have come to realize that the so-called “Two Party System” (often logically parodied as America’s “One Party System” when it comes to the corrupting influences of Wall Street and War Street [Big Finance, Big Military, Big Media, Big Food, Big Pharma, etc]) has been increasingly co-opted by the wealthy ruling elites who have been “purchasing” the blind allegiance (and later voting patterns) of both Republicans and Democrats. But the stench from this system is getting over-powering and sooner or later real patriots will have to stand up and start choosing candidates that are the least influenced by money and power and the most committed to a sustainable future for our increasingly poisoned nation, planet and children, not to mention all the other victims of global American imperialism, militarism, racism and economic destabilization.

However the candidates and their billionaire paymasters win their seats, they are the ones that will shamelessly be making life or death decisions for the lowly 99 Percenters wherever they are in the nation or the world.

These essentially amoral elites (the wealthy campaign contributors/bribers who are in the game for the money and power) are the ones who will be deciding the fate of the earth (and the fate of our innocent progeny) as they repeatedly fail to do the right thing for humanity. A dogmatic principle for conservatives is to “never change the status quo if the status quo is making a lot of money for the investor classes and is creating a lot of power that could be lost if reforms in favor of the common good are made”.

American NeoConservatives in the Republican Party (and the NeoLiberals in the Democratic Party) refuse to acknowledge that unbridled, unregulated capitalism is poisoning the planet’s climate, water, air, soil and food supplies (and therefore dooming the public health) and, in order to continue duping the sickened public, are investing billions of dollars in the raft of well-paid, well-tutored, lapdog politicians and spokespersons that will allow the corporate gravy train to continue unimpeded, with little or no concern for the 99%.

Telephone Surveys as a Propaganda Tool

Every week or so during campaign season, corporate-controlled media groups do telephone surveys that ask skewed questions of a small number of allegedly “statistically significant” landline phone owners that happen to answer the phone calls (cell phone owners seem to be excluded, a serious flaw that makes the results suspect). Select results of the surveys are dutifully reported on the corporate-controlled media, often stating that “most Americans view the country as moving in the wrong direction” – with the implication that the political party currently in power (rather than the corporate elites that control the agendas of both parties) is responsible for the lack of public confidence and therefore deserving of being thrown out of office.

The pollsters never do surveys asking people to evaluate the job performance of the leadership of America’s corrupted capitalist system and its exploitive and extractive economy that is systematically devastating the environment. If such a survey were ever taken, I suspect that the Wall Street and War Street profiteers and the other captains of industry (those that are so obscenely rich that they can afford armed bodyguards, private chauffeurs and live in mansions in more than one gated community) would have trouble getting much more than a single-digit job approval rating.

Ratings for their corporations, despite the billions of dollars spent “green-washing” their images on TV, would be similar to the 9 % approval rating of the US Congress (and nowhere near the supposedly disastrous 46 % job approval rating for President Obama. Most of us 99 Percenters would testify, if we were ever asked, that it is the unelected 1 Percenter misleaders and their corporations that are leading America in the wrong direction, laughing all the way to their off-shore tax-evasion banks.

I would like to see an unbiased poll of mental healthcare folks and others who have witnessed up close and personal the tortured bodies, psyches and souls of America’s suicidal and homicidal combat veterans (not to mention their traumatized battlefield “enemy” victims, most of whom were innocent non-combatant civilians, especially women and children) who were wasted in the illegal and stupid Cheney/Rumsfeld/Bush wars for oil in Afghanistan and Iraq. I suspect that such folks would denounce, if asked to be entirely truthful, the corporate war profiteers and their Congressional lobbyists that have been keeping the military/industrial/congressional/media complex’s gravy train going full steam ahead. Isn’t it obvious that it is those unelected 1 Percenters behind such immoral activities that need to be resisted, shunned and thrown out of power?

More

A community betrayed: San Carlos city council votes for ECLEI and against their community

9 Comments

 

Marti Oakley

_______________________________________________________

On January 23, 2012 the San Carlos, California city council voted on whether to continue its involvement and membership in ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives).  Of course, this council with the exception of the Vice Mayor, Matt Grocott, voted to reaffirm its membership in the UN Agenda 21 program which is focused on ending private property rights; declaring these rights to property to be a “social injustice”.   Using terms such as “green initiatives, carbon reduction, energy conservation, biodiversity,” and tons of other sustainable and smart growth catch phrases taken directly from UN Agenda 21 all of which are meant to hide the real intent of ICLEI, the Council sat quietly, looking somehow bored.

At no time did the Council members debate or discuss the merits of the information from either side with the exception of the Vice Mayor’s comments.

On a personal note:  It seemed quite apparent to me after viewing the video and watching the facial expressions of the council members and the ICLEI promoters, that at best they were all bored and at times they were amused at the objections and evidence presented to them by community members.  The public meeting was just a formality they were required to conduct, obviously having made their decisions prior to the meeting and regardless of any factual evidence.

Even though the representative for ICLEI, Brian Moura was shown to have given fraudulent information to the Council regarding ICLEI’s connection to UN Agenda 21 and even after the Vice Mayor documented the false answers produced by the research department and presented by Moura to the Council, the Mayor and his good buddies took a quick vote and then exited the hall even quicker.  I assume its one thing to betray your community in such a manner, but quite another to stand and face the people you just betrayed. 

The lack of concern regarding the false statements made to them by Mr. Moura  appeared to be an accepted practice by this council.  As quickly as Grocott finished his presentation documenting the false statements and fictionalized research, the remaining council members couldn’t move fast enough to vote against their community.  Not one of them acknowledged or addressed the documentation produced by the Vice Mayor. 

________________________

Use these time frames to highlight specific speeches:

00:18 ICLEI Description – Brian Moura
01:59 Agenda 21 Description – Brian Moura
02:56 Brian Moura answers Council Questions
06:14 Public Comments
06:31 – Rosa Koire
09:13 – George
09:36 – Nina
09:56 – Kaye
10:33 – Mario
10:50 – Dee
11:01 – Scott
11:24 – Glenn
11:44 – Mike
12:00 – Jim
12:17 – Debbie
13:45 – Leslie
13:53 – Mario
14:12 Vice Mayor – Matt Grocott
21:48 Vote on ICLEI

Stave off Globalism: Reinvigorate Constitutional Principles

5 Comments

___________________________________________________
“We know how we got into this situation; we forgot to stay alert and hew to the values of our predecessors. Now we must ask how these trends can be reversed.  How can we rid the Unites States of globalism?” 

 Michael Shaw
1-12-11

America was founded on certain principles: those of individual liberty and responsibility, a small federal government, and sovereign states that would protect their citizens’ unalienable rights.  Over time many Americans got so involved in living their seemingly free lives they neglected oversight of what was happening to their country. Those who loved American ideals lived them and those who did not were busy working both from within and without the government to eradicate these principles from the American consciousness. 

This dumbing down of America was planned and it took place over many decades as Charlotte Iserbyt explains in her Deliberate Dumbing Down of America expose. Controlled media and public education infused the populace with attitudes, values and beliefs that enabled the power thrust of globalists to grow. Thus the greatest political experiment in the history of the world has morphed into what we now call “globalism”.   More

What is Communitarian Law?

1 Comment

live link: AxXiom for Liberty

March 16, 2010

Communitarian Law is the new legal system used by regional and local governments affiliated with the emerging global government. This new law circumvents national law via a program of “balancing,” often implemented by a small group of self-appointed elites who achieve consensus (not voting). For Americans, the adoption of these evolving principles transports us from a constitutional system where we expect clearly defined basic rights (like due process and legal searches) to a more moral way of enforcing “social justice” that only a few upper level academics can define.

Communitarian law is the precedent that requires the courts to rule in favor of the self-defined “community” against individuals protected by constitutional law. It limits the property rights of individuals in all member nations. The most obvious current communitarian decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court is Kelo v. The City of New London, a land rights case that balanced property rights against comunitarian development goals. The least obvious communitarian decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court is Hiibel v. The State of Nevada, a privacy rights case that balanced private individual’s right to annonymity. In all U.S. communitarian legislation and criminal code, the stated purpose is to balance individual rights against community responsibilities. It’s called Reinventing Government. Based on the consensus reached by globalist do-gooders, all nations are now required to adjust their national systems. The world is in an ongoing process of internal re-inventions of national political and legal infrastructures.

http://nord.twu.net/acl/commlaw.html#two

%d bloggers like this: