Home

Fatally Flawed Justice System: The Monopoly of the Corporate BAR Associations

17 Comments

Be sure to read the comments that are coming in.  Click the link above to access!

Marti Oakley

PPJ Gazette copyright ©

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution for the United States authorizing, or otherwise directing the creation of these self protecting unions that have monopolized our judicial system at every level and use that monopoly to profit at the public’s expense. And, there is nothing authorizing the incorporation of these specialized unions or of the Supreme Court itself. Yet here we are in the grips of these corporate entities who have monopolized the very judicial system meant to protect America from just such things.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In every state and on the Federal level, the BAR Associations have established a monopoly on our courts and our so-called judicial system. The existing Sherman Act: the Clayton Act and FTC Act only become active when the monopolized systems that have been established harm consumers. I can think of no other more harmful monopoly to the American public overall, than what passes for the judicial system in America and its associated BAR unions that not ony control and own our courts, but also profit mightily from doing so. The law is what they say it is regardless of what the law might actually be.

The Sherman Act outlaws “every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade,” and any “monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize.” Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherman Act does not prohibit every restraint of trade, only those that are unreasonable. Obviously, the Supreme Court has decided that the monopolies that exist in our courts are not unreasonable. Especially since they too, participate in that monopoly.

Q: Do you believe the monopolies on our courts at every level via so-called BAR Associations are unreasonable?

When individuals go to all the expense and time of acquiring a degree in law, why should they then be required to pass some contrived test, many times at great expense, to acquire a union card (The BARS are UNIONS) permitting them to work in the field they trained in or to practice their trade in any court room in this country? No union card? No access to the courts. Didn’t pay your BAR union dues for access to the courts they monopolize? Too bad for you!

Even the Supreme Court of the United States has established itself as its own BAR. To be heard in this highly politicized “court”, you must be a member in good standing for four years in another BAR union before you can apply to appear in their closed union shop called the Supreme Court. More

A new kind of slavery: Guardianship in America

2 Comments

new-logo251_002Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Claiming the victim is [incapacitated], these parasitic predators then petition for guardianship. The proof of incapacity? Most likely does not exist. The predatory guardian simply has to claim to the probate tribunal administrator, that there is incapacity of some kind. They do not have to provide any proof, no evidence of any kind to substantiate their claim. After all, there is an estate to be exploited”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What it really means to become a “ward of the state”

So how does a living, breathing human being find themselves in front of a probate tribunal? And why should being declared incapacitated, cause you to cease to exist in the law?

Probate supposedly only comes into play upon presentation of the death certificate. It appears that being declared a ward and the accompanying court order, is the de facto death certificate. rules-over-youThe entire system is pivots on the targeted victim being deprived of their natural rights and liberties; an impossible task unless by administrative order they are deprived of their own existence.

To become a “ward of the state” means that you lose your identity, all of your natural rights and liberties and everything you own so much so that another person takes over your life, your identity and all of your life’s work contained in your assets. For all intents and purposes, you died. You just didn’t know it.

Guardianship is said to be the fastest growing cottage industry in America. It is, in a nutshell, the complete takeover of another human beings’ life for the purpose of financial exploitation and personal financial gain. The predators in this government sanctioned system are no less insidious, no less of a danger to the public, than any other predator. More

Syria update: Thursday….The run up to another war

7 Comments

 strip bannernew-logo25Gary Jacobucci
___________________________________________________________________________________
Gary Jacobucci has collected the top articles from across the web concerning Obama’s plan to start yet another illegal war.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

You Cost America a Great Deal This Past Week, Mr.  President 

Charlie Daniels  Infowars.com Sept. 4,  2013

In my soon to be 77 years as a citizen of the United States of  America, having lived through Japan’s sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, the dark  days of WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Watergate, 9/11 and all the other serious and  profound events our beloved nation has been involved in over the last three  quarters of a century, I have to say with all sincerity that I have never seen a  president as confused, befuddled, impotent, insincere and as out of his depth as  Barack Obama has become in dealing with the Syrian issue.

Senate Foreign Relations Panel Approves Military  Action in Syria

Julie Wilson  Infowars.com September 4,  2013

US inches one step closer to war with Syria

Wednesday the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved  authorization of US military action in Syria. While the vote still needs to be  approved by the full Senate next week, the action is a slap in the face for a  majority of Americans who oppose any sort of military intervention in the Middle  Eastern country.

Congress Prepares Resolution Allowing Obama to Attack  Syria

Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com September 4, 2013

Constitutional scholar: resolution eerily like previous Gulf of  Tonkin resolution

Gulf of  Tonkin false flag resulted in the Vietnam War that killed more  than 3 million Southeast Asians and nearly 60,000  Americans.

Despite Secretary of State John Kerry’s assurance that Arab countries will pay for an  attack on Syria, opposition to the ill-conceived  operation is growing.

The National Review Online quotes Rep. Matt Salmon of Arizona. Salmon said hundreds of constituents – with the  exception of two – have called his office urging him to resist the move in  Congress to vote in favor of attacking Syria.

“I don’t see any national-security imperative for our country at  all. Both sides in this equation are bad actors,” Salmon said. “Other than  saving face for the president, I don’t understand what we would be doing,” he  added.

Salmon also told the NRO few believe Obama’s strikes will be  surgical. “Nobody believes this is going  to be a couple surgical strikes” he said dismissively.

The Arizona congressman said that he believes Obama will flaunt the  will of Congress and attack Syria if Congress fails to issue an authorization.  It will be a full-blown constitutional  crisis if Obama overrides the will of Congress and would represent the “most  significant flouting of separation of powers in this nation,” the congressman  said.

Regardless of polls showing an overwhelming  number of Americans opposing any military action against Syria, on Wednesday the Senate worked overtime to draft a resolution  allowing Obama to strike the Arab nation under what the Washington Times described as “very tight circumstances.” More

FDA pours salt in the Constitution’s wounds

Leave a comment

D o w n s i z e r – D i s p a t c h

downsizer-dispatch@downsizedc.orgIt’s bad enough when Congress exercises unconstitutional powers. It’s even worse when unelected bureaucrats do it. The FDA has decided, all on its own, that it has the power to reduce the amount of salt in your diet.

Depending on your genetic predisposition and health history, this move could be life threatening to YOU.

The FDA wants you to forget that . . .

* the Constitution gives the federal government no jurisdiction over your nutritional choices
* every person is unique — many people might benefit from less sodium, while others could be harmed by it (see the sample letter below for examples)

DownsizeDC.org’s Write the Laws Act (WTLA) would prevent bureaucratic schemes like this. It would . . . More

Who is Lt. Eric Shine, and why should we care?

9 Comments

Source: Martial Law 911

Lt. Eric Shine is a graduate of the United States Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point and is an expert in the history of the United States Merchant Marine, as well as issues relating to shipping and national security.

In his role as a whistle blower, Lt. Shine has taken his USMM oath, Acto Non Verba or “Deeds Not Words” to new heights. Lt. Shine has been the subject on hundreds of articles and has appeared on numerous television and radio programs nationwide including shows on Air America, Voice of America, and Pacifica Radio.

%d bloggers like this: