Home

Don’t Criticize What You Can’t Understand (About the Science of Vaccine Neurotoxicity)

4 Comments

Duty to Warn

A Collection of Recent Journal Articles Solidifying the Connections Between America’s Over-Vaccination Agenda and the Epidemics of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Chronic Autoimmune Disorders

 

 Gary G. Kohls, MD – July 4, 2017

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“It is a near certainty that the AMA, the AAP, the IOM – and the recent critics of this column’s statements of scientific fact regarding the many dangers of the neurotoxicity of America’s over-vaccination programs – have little or no knowledge of the following research studies that totally debunk their claims that all vaccines are both safe and effective and that Big Medicine and Big Pharma can be trusted to implement their over-vaccination agendas, even to the point of forcibly vaccinating people against their wills.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In an obscure interview back in 1956, the entertainer Elvis Presley was quoted as saying: “Don’t criticize what you don’t understand, son. You never walked in that man’s shoes.” But But none of Elvis’s many song-writers ever wrote a song that included that wonderful truism.

However, Bob Dylan, in his iconic “The Times They Are A-Changing” (1962), immortalized the phrase. It is not likely that Dylan stole the phrase from one of Presley’s songs because Elvis once admitted: “I’ve never written a song in my life.”

Dylan’s poetic truism has always stayed with me. To remind readers of its power, here is the fourth verse of that song:

“Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don’t criticize
What you can’t understand

Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is rapidly agin’
Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin’.

There is a surge of anti-intellectualism and anti-science belief systems in the United States. People who know nothing about climate science are ridiculing altruistic climate scientists who know what they are talking about. Respected, unbiased scientists (those who are not in the back pockets of the fossil fuel and coal industries) are fulfilling their moral duty to warn the rest of us about the imminent danger of potentially unstoppable – and catastrophic – warming of the planet, a reality that could easily make the planet unlivable for animal life n the near future (like the gradually expanding Sahara Desert has been exhibiting for us for years).

Unbiased geological scientists, scholars and assorted well-informed citizen activists (at least those who have not been hired and thus co-opted by Big Mining) understand the potentially catastrophic dangers of sulfide mining that is threatening my home state of Minnesota. These altruistic scientists and citizen activists are being viciously demonized (even with death threats) by some folks who happen to live in the boom-and-bust (non-sulfide) iron ore country that now has commercially-viable copper sulfide ore deposits in the water-rich part of the state. More

Is Science Illusory?

Leave a comment

new logo ozziethinker

_____________________________________________________________

Though few of us might appear to have direct relationships with that which is outside the Earth, we are all connected through a combination of history and divine planning – as representative of our multi-faceted symbiotic universal presence.

______________________________________________________________________

madscientistlab_zpsa30606da

The term “science” has grown to be more than an area of study, seeking to hypothesize and theorize about our world. It has become more than a framework for exploration. In its purest form, it has no “limits” and could theoretically embrace non-material, metaphysical aspects of our existence. Yet, in our modern age, science has become corporatized and dogmatic- more worried about pursuing money than about pursuing what makes our universe “tick”.

More than this, many prominent scientists have taken Newtonian “[only] that which can be measured exists” materialism and become as narrow-minded and oppressive as organized religion became during the Middle Ages, the Crusades, and Inquisitions culminating in Salem during the so-called Witch Trials. For instance Maria von Monjou (arguably the inventor of the biological microscope) was drowned as a witch in 1552. To be sure, the powers behind these oppressive movements were serving their own interests, but they did so under the banner of “religion”. Could the same be said of today’s science, but maybe the intrigue runs deeper?

More

Flawed Science and Danger of the HPV Vaccines

2 Comments

new-logo25 Dr Gary Kohls, M.D.

________________________________________________

Nephrologist, researcher and scholar Dr Suzanne Humphries (one of the few outspoken physician-whistle-blowers that, of course, has never been co-opted by the vaccine industry) knows more about the basic science – and the dangers – of vaccinations than anybody else in medicine, talks about the issue of vaccines and autism at:

This information, addressed to the Dept of Justice, is mainly for those common sense correspondents of mine who know that there is truth behind the concerns of parents of autistic spectrum disorder-afflicted kids and other fully vaccinated children who are also now afflicted with a variety of autoimmune and other chronic illnesses (now representing 1/3 of the fully vaccinated childhood population in America). These chronic illnesses may not be curable unless the root cause is accurately identified:. Please read on:

Because this is so important, I ask that you drop everything and watch nephrologist/scholar Dr Suzanne Humphries talk about the flawed science and dangers of the HPV campaign that is being promoted by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, AAFP, AMA, Big Medicine, Big Pharma and the corporate media to get parents to have their pre-adolescent daughters (and sons) submit to the HPV vaccine’s three $100+ doses (plus office call charges) that have been proven to only give temporary immunologic “protection” against 2 or 4 of the 15 potentially carcinogenic human papilloma viruses.

The two brands of HPV vaccines that Big Pharma companies have managed to get the FDA to approve only have very weak theoretical reasons behind their promotion, and it is highly likely that both innoculants will, in the 20 – 30 years it will take to either prove or disprove the claims, be found to have been worthless and even dangerous when the end results will be available (so far there has been no proof that they can prevent cancer of the cervix; in fact, just the opposite already seems to be true).

So far the only claim for alleged vaccine “effectiveness” is that some vaccinees manage to develop transient immune responses to the shots in most of the recipients, but no decreases in cervical cancer or even pre-cancerous lesions have been found (in fact there have been cases of HPV-infections and cervical pre-cancerous lesions found in the young vaccinated girls!!

Thus there have been no proof of HPV vaccine safety. And, since the HPV innoculum contains large amounts of the toxic adjuvant – and ultimately immune-suppressant – aluminum, as well as a variety of inevitable contaminants (that have been found in many vaccines), one could predict harmfulness, both short-term and long-term!!

(At this point it might be good to recall Voltaires’ admonition: “Those who can get you to believe absurdities, can get you to commit atrocities.”)

More

Interrupting the Zombie-Robot Monotribe

2 Comments

Joseph A Olson, PE | 01 March 2012

Slayingtheskydragon.com
________________________________________________________________________________

Recently a fervent supporter of the ‘human Carbon Dioxide controls the climate hypothesis’ admitted to several potential criminal activities. Historically, human thought has been restricted to view everything as a “two sides to every story” false didactic. Often there are multiple sides to every story, but if there is money to be made by only two sides, then the full range of options is often not permitted.

A perfect example of this is the two faced, single party American political system. Locking debate into Republican-Democrat, or Conservative-Liberal leaves no room for wider alternatives, but provides the delusion of democracy, with no need of a ‘third’ party. The climate science debate is in fact a three sided debate, but with only two sides funded, you would be hard pressed to notice.

This well known, now confessed criminal Warmist supporter, obtained opposition documents that he felt would be very damaging and released them to his fellow Warmists. The greatest damage seems to be self inflicted as this advocate has been removed for board positions at the Pacific Institute, the National Center of Science Education and as Chairman of the American Geophysical Union Task Force on Scientific Ethics. Sometimes advocacy becomes uncontrollable zealotry, a frequent occurrence in the eco-movement. Dr Michael McPhaden, President of AGU has posted the societies position on this man’s behavior at their website, which reads in part:

“In doing so he compromised AGU’s credibility as a scientific society, weakened the public’s trust in scientists, and produced fresh fuel for the unproductive and seemingly endless ideological firestorm surrounding the reality of Earth’s changing climate.” Posted 27 Feb 2012

Dr McPhaden has an impressive resume in Oceanography and includes a Citation for Excellence in Refereeing. Objective refereeing should require a through examination of all of the opposing points of view. The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine has an online petition with over 31, 487 scientists, including 9,029 with PhD’s that disagree with Warmist orthodoxy. To label this legitimate dissent as unproductive ideological firestorm is not the expected treatment for scientific debate. More

The Problem With Transnationals And What To Do About It

Leave a comment

Live Link: Activist Post

Anthony Migchels, Contributing Writer

_________________________________________________________ 

New York’s Public Advocate, Bill de Blasio, recently released a very important study (pdf) about Wal-Mart’s effects on local communities. It

The Prisoners Dilemma

 represents a major step forward in the understanding of the effects of Big Business.

These effects are insufficiently understood, because scholars have degenerated into spin masters for Big Business, simply because it is Big Business that controls their budgets, allowing only studies explaining how wonderful they are. It’s the same process that led medical ‘science’ to the conclusion that Mustard Gas is beneficial to human health. READ MORE

From Monsanto, Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed Confirmed in Ontario, Plus

Leave a comment

by: Sandra Finely/Canada

____________________________________

(1)      COMMENTARY ON MONSANTO’S NEWS RELEASE.  NO LIMITS TO THE INSANITY.

Soil sterility from accumulated “residual” chemicals.  The desperation in Monsanto’s message. 

(2)      MONSANTO’S “SCIENTISTS” REPORT …

(3)      FROM THE U.K., REPORT ON EFFECTS OF GE FOOD (YOU WON’T SEE THIS IN CANADIAN NEWSPAPERS)

= = = = = = = = = = = =  ==  = = = = = = ==

(1)     COMMENTARY ON MONSANTO’S NEWS RELEASE.  NO LIMITS TO THE INSANITY. 

Soil sterility from accumulated “residual” chemicals.  The desperation in Monsanto’s message.  More

If you disagree with the CO2/global warming proponents, you will be verbally attacked and insulted

1 Comment

                   By: Al Whitney   (c) Copyright 2009

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED                           Tell a Friend 

This is a difficult message to send out, because many of us have discovered that if you disagree with the CO2/global warming proponents, you will be verbally attacked and insulted. Regrettably, I participated in some of that nasty behavior myself. The good news for me is that I was able to attend a subsequent meeting of the group I had verbally attacked for their skeptical global warming position and apologize to them – which I did.

My message to the good Democrat environmentalists who care about the environment and loathe corruption
If you take the time to investigate the recently released email communications of the leading climatologists promoting man-made global warming, it becomes apparent that the CO2/global warming issue has corruption and fraud written all over it.

If you have don’t have time to review the following articles, their essence is superbly and eloquently expressed by Lord Monkton in this short 10 minute video:

Recent stories main stream media didn’t report . . .
More

Leuren Moret, Depopulation and the Nihilist Agenda of the Elite

1 Comment

I recently viewed two video interviews with Leuren Moret, the former scientist-turned-whistler-blower who has changed her life’s work from laboratory science to exposing the elite’s agenda of using depleted uranium and other deadly means to attack humanity.

In these two videos, which are both loaded with the shocking facts about DU, eugenics, the global depopulation agenda, etc., you will find a reference (toward the end of the video on the Uranium wars) to the fact that the Bushes (George Sr. and Barbara) have had their thyroid glands removed and that their children (inluding our former idiot president) were all born with learning disorders, the result of the family’s own exposure to the very same toxins they and their elite cronies have been exposing us all to. This clearly indicates that, not only do the elite want to destroy humanity, but their expendable minions and even themselves, in the process. Theirs is an evil and nihilistic agenda that cannot be fathomed by the rational mind.

Leuren Moret on the Uranium Wars

Leuren Moret on Depopulation

Preparing us for another insider attack

Leave a comment

 

 

We are the leader in the world in the production of biological terrorist weapons.  BioShield 1, and BioShield 2 are programs whose sole intent is to create, revive, mutate and expand existing and soon to be created lethal viruses, bacteria and other designer killer bugs, designed for the exclusive purpose of wiping out immense portions of the human population.  That anyone thinks our government is funding and designing lethal biological weapons only for use on some far away country, is naïve at best.  At its worst, it is a case of blissful ignorance.

 

Our government in tandem with military leaders, labs and willing genocidal scientific monsters, are preparing to assault not only foreign countries, but also our own with the new WMD: bacteria, viruses and plagues for which there is no known cure, or, if there is one, one that won’t be provided to anyone other than those selected as being worth saving.  Chances are, if you are reading this article you aren’t in that group.

 

On December 25, 2008, Chertoff of Homeland Security made this announcement to Faux News. 

12/25/2008

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/25/report-terror-threats-target-economic-losses/ (Read full article here:)

 

“When determining threats, intelligence officials consider loss of life, economic and psychological consequences.

 

Intelligence officials also predict that in the next five years, terrorists will try to conduct a destructive biological attack. Officials are concerned about the possibility of infections to thousands of U.S. citizens, overwhelming regional health care systems. (emphasis mine)

 

There could also be dire economic impacts caused by workers’ illnesses and deaths. Officials are most concerned about biological agents stolen from labs or other storage facilities, such as anthrax.” (end excerpt)

 

This statement was nothing more than the beginning of the conditioning process needed to substantiate the conspiracy theory the government will put forward when this planned attack by those in government controlled labs launch their attack on US citizens.  By the time this attack actually takes place the majority of us will be fully convinced that some mad scientist in a cave in some far away place somehow had a computer that was so powerful that it could operate with no known internet system, but launched a bio attack none-the-less.  Few of us will be willing or able to identify the real culprit and will pass the story of the mad scientist as though it was scripture.

 

If there is an attack coming, Chertoff knows because he more than likely has first hand knowledge.   The US has a long and sordid history of testing biological agents on its own population.  In addition, physical experimentation is also a reality and seen as totally acceptable as long as the subject of the experiment is uninformed and/or is socially vulnerable, such as orphans, minorities or the mentally ill.

 

This is a link to one of the most comprehensive articles ever written on the subject of government experimentation and drugging of unsuspecting individuals.

http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html                                                                                                        Excerpted from the full article:                                                                                                                          As you read through these science experiments, you’ll learn the stories of newborns injected with radioactive substances, mentally ill people placed in giant refrigerators, military personnel exposed to chemical weapons by the very government they served and mentally challenged children being purposely infected with hepatitis. These stories are facts, not fiction: Each account, no matter how horrifying, is backed up with a link or citation to a reputable source.” (end excerpt)

Maybe these horrendous things can be marginally justified when outcomes at times seem to benefit others.  For myself, this is not enough to justify the inhuman testing done on innocent people.  And, when you consider that the actual intent is not on curing or preventing disease, but rather, how to use disease as a beneficial government tool to eradicate population, that margin shrinks.

If the intent of science was to cure or prevent, why do we have government and university labs all across the country dedicated to creating designer diseases, viruses, bacteria?  Why are our communities and food production lands being covered in chemtrails and contaminated with genetically modified crops?  Why are vaccines administered to our baby’s that cause autism, seizures, mental retardation and sudden infant death?  Why are our water supplies contaminated with industrial grade fluoride, a waste product of radiation?  Why are our young girls being encouraged to get the Gardasil vaccine for the HPV virus that has no connection to cervical cancer?  Why are we being force fed genetically modified foods that cause organ damage, Morgellans and which alter our own human dna? 

It won’t be some mad scientist in a cave plotting a biological attack on us or anyone else……it will be those in our own government labs armed with the most horrendous diseases and plagues ever devised and dying for the chance to try them out. 

© 2008 Marti Oakley

Weapons Labs Biological Research Raises Concerns | Arms Control

www.armscontrol.org/act/2008_03/WeaponsLabs

 

Lax Biodefense Lab Oversight Putting U.S. at Risk, GAO Says

dtirp.dtra.mil/CBW/CBW/Calendar/NG/ng_05oct07_1.pdf

 

 

GAO-07-333R Biological Research Laboratories: Issues Associated

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07333r.pdf

 

 

The Creationist Con Job

5 Comments

 by Alan Adaschik

 

Most people are under the impression that there is a debate raging within this Nation between evolution and creation science and, indeed, there is. However, for the most part, this debate is one sided and the side doing the debating are those who subscribe to what is alleged to be “creation science”. I use the word “alleged” because creation science has nothing to do with “science” and in truth, it is nothing more than religious dogma masquerading as science. This being the case, the notion that there is really something of substance to debate is a key and essential element of the creationist con job.

 

“Science”, fundamentally, is a disciplined search for knowledge. The key word in this sentence is “disciplined” and the first litmus test for being disciplined is a lack of bias. It is here where the creationists fall flat on their faces. A scientist seeks to explain the world within which we live. He does so by observing a phenomena and coming up with the most plausible explanation or theory for what he sees. But he doesn’t stop there. Next, he devises methodologies for testing his theory. If his theory fails these tests, he develops a new theory and the process begins again. If the theory passes the tests, he publishes his work for others to test and validate. Finally, when a general consensus is reached within the scientific community that a theory is correct, only then is it accepted as being true.

 

Similarly, a creation scientist starts out with a theory; that God created world according to scripture. However, this is not a theory in the true sense of the word because the theory itself is tainted with bias. When a scientist creates a theory, he has no ownership of it and it is understood at the outset that if the theory proves to be incorrect, it will be rejected. A creation scientist has no intention of ever rejecting God or scripture, so his so called “theory” will not be proven wrong under any circumstances and, indeed, the creationist does everything possible to ensure that this is the case. This is accomplished by dismissing all evidence contrary to his theory and grasping upon anything that can possibly support it. In truth, very little does and most of this evidence is obtained by stretching logic and reason to their breaking points. This same twisted reason and logic is used to attack and discredit evidence that is contrary to a creationist’s preconceived notions.

 

There are two kinds of scientists; those that believe in God and those that don’t. To sustain the illusion of debate, creation scientist would have us believe that most scientists who subscribe to Evolution are atheists and being atheists they are biased by their intent to disprove God. Nothing could be further from the truth. The vast majority of scientists who subscribe to Evolution are religious men who sincerely believe in God. This being the case, they are also men who would willingly and gladly embrace creationism if creationism was the best explanation for what they find in the world. It is not and being good scientists, they conclude accordingly while maintaining their faith in God.

 

Creation scientists would have us believe that Evolution is only a theory and has not been proven. The truth of the matter is that evolutionary theory, by its very nature, will never be proven. However, like other scientific theories, it can be validated and creation scientists, of course, conveniently ignore and deny this. When Charles Darwin first published, “The Origin of the Species”, he based his work on the evidence available at the time. Since then, uncountable new discoveries have been made that reinforce and support his theory. Do creation scientists acknowledge this continually growing pile of evidence? No, of course not! They ignore it and point to what has not yet been discovered, knowing full well that there will always be a gap in the fossil record to help them assail the obvious truth.

 

Creation science is not science. It is a distortion of science used by religious fundamentalists to lend an air of legitimacy to their claims. The danger in this is that by so doing, they are undermining science and the scientific approach to obtaining knowledge. This is their real goal. Intelligent and thinking human beings are a threat to the power and control that the religious right has over people. Anything that is a threat to the power and control that the religious right has over people is also a threat to their political power as well. And that’s what creation science is all about; political power.

 Constitution Forum.us – Copyright © 2003 

%d bloggers like this: