Home

Children’s Health Defense: Stripping Away Rights

3 Comments

February 28, 2019

The Reality of Vaccine Injury: A Much Needed Lesson for Carly Weeks

“My bill deals with the occurrences and documentation of severe side-effects which can result from the vaccination of infants and children. Some members may not be aware that the routine vaccination called DPT, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus, given to almost every one of our children, can lead to convulsions, brain damage and even death.”

“Vaccines are not safe and effective for everyone. This cannot be a one-size-fits-all. Not everyone had the same risk factors. This is not a 1-in-a-million type issue; there can be 10 to 15% of people who are susceptible. This is a liability-free product that is being mandated on children with genetic susceptibility, and the injuries are serious, include death and encephalopathy. If you eliminate these exemptions, you are making a large minority susceptible to very serious risks, including death.” — Dr. Toni Bark

HR 34: A violation of your right to be free from forced drugging, psychiatry and a host of other government intrusions

3 Comments

URGENT ACTION ALERT

On November 30th, the House passed HR 34, a 996-page bill, known as the 21st Century Cures Act. They are now rushing to get it introduced and passed by the Senate on Monday, December 5th, at 5:30 EST. This bill must be defeated because it contains some very dangerous provisions relating to psychiatric treatments.  This is an urgent call to action as we must let our Senators know that they need to oppose it.  We have less than 72-hours to do this.
TALKING POINTS ON WHY THIS BILL MUST BE OPPOSED:
*         It drastically broadens the criteria for who qualifies for forced psychiatric treatment.  For example, if you are labeled mentally ill, you can be court-ordered for psychiatric treatment just because you are “substantially unlikely to voluntarily participate in treatment.”  All states already have their own laws regarding involuntary treatment and so there is no need for Federal legislation, especially with such dangerously broad language.
*         It undermines FDA regulations that are essential for making sure medical and drug research is conducted ethically, scientifically and safely.  Meaning it could cost lives. 
*         Additionally, this 996-page bill is being fast-tracked through as it is being introduced with no time for the Senators to fully study and understand the broad implications of it.
If you live in the United States, we need you to do the following, very simple actions-it will take you less than 10 minutes:
1.    Find your Senators (you have TWO) at the end of this e-mail. They are listed alphabetically by state.
2.    Call the listed numbers and, using any or all of the above talking points, tell them you want to urge the Senator to vote NO on HR 34. Note: Calls are the most effective way to make your voice heard.
3.    Click on the contact link for each of your TWO senators. This brings you to a form to fill out which you follow the steps to email your message that you want them to vote NO on HR 34.
4.    Forward this e-mail to ALL family members, friends, or colleagues that live in the United States and urge them to do the same.

Please make your calls and send your e-mails right away, then e-mail us back to let us know you have done so.

Sincerely,
Carla Moxon
Director of Public Activities
CCHR International
800-869-2247

LIST OF U.S. SENATORS, IN ORDER BY STATE:

More

Minnesota Department of Health Vaccine Insanity

4 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley ©Copyright 2013 All rights reserved

_____________________________________________________________________

Minnesota Department of Health: Coercion and entrapment

Question:  If vaccines actually work with any degree of efficiency (not efficacy), why would non-vaccinated individuals represent any kind of threat to the vaccinated?  Doesn’t the vaccine provide you with magical protection against whatever disease you supposedly took it for?

This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both.  The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination.  This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.

_______________________________________________________________

The Minnesota Department of Health is in the process of attempting to introduce even more vaccines into the mandated schedule for children from infancy, on.  The toxic load of heavy metals, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, fetal cell lines from aborted babies (diploids), DNA strands from non-related species such as chickens and swine, live and dead viruses, thimerisol, mercury and whatever else could be found to giving_babies_drugs-18540load the vaccines, has many parents wondering just what is really going on.  *Flu shots contain 25 micrograms of mercury. One microgram is considered toxic. By age two, most US children have received around 237 micrograms of mercury through vaccines alone. *See list below of contents of one vaccine alone**

Minnesota just recently banned formaldehyde in all products EXCLUDING VACCINES!

One childhood shot can contain as many as one million strands of someone or something else’s transfective DNA, now circulating in your child’s body.

So-called moral and social obligations that are being cited as a means of coercion to encourage parents to subject their infants, toddlers and young adults to intentional infection, heavy metal poisoning and the high risk of autism and other life long impairments, is just that: COERCION

The one size fits all approach of vaccines has produced an efficiency rate of about 34% over-all.  That means that without hand-picking an ideal group [efficacy] that could possibly respond positively to the vaccine, there is only a 34% chance the vaccine will work at all [efficiency].

Efficacy simply means that IF a selected and ideal group of candidates for the vaccine were found and isolated, the vaccine could work at least some of the time.  To find this ideal group would require extensive testing to exclude pre-existing known or unknown genetic disorders, current infections, past infections, blood work panels, and various other biological factors and medically based  information gathering. This information gathering is almost never done.

How many times has any physician done any of these tests before admonishing parents to vaccinate their child?

While harping continually on the “efficacy” of vaccines, not one of those proposing increasing the toxic load have addressed the difference between “efficacy” as opposed to “efficiency”.  Using the word [efficacy] is intentional and avoids the real issue of [efficiency].

MDH: We’ll set you up for future charges!

In their efforts to force compliance with this intentional assault on our children, the Minnesota Department of Health has responded by creating this form for parents who object to intentionally risking their children’s lifetime health with the injection of toxins in vaccines.

As is, the form is intentionally worded to imply that the parent or guardian is endangering their child(ren):

___________________________________________________

At about page 23. MDH Developed this form to have parents sign that looks like this

D.

If the parent/guardian conscientiously opposes required immunizations:

Not following vaccination recommendations may endanger the health or life of my child and others that

my child might come in contact with.

I hereby certify by notarization that:

I am opposed to all immunizations.

I am opposed to only the vaccines indicated. Vaccine(s) I oppose:

______________________________________________________

This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both.  The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination.  This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.

Here is a more relevant opt out form to use that avoids the word trap included in the proposed opt out by MDH: More

F.A.S.T. by DHS: Seems like The Minority Report

Leave a comment

The Minority Report comes to life!  This HSD training film highlights the use of behavorial attributes, multiple screening techniques and invasions of privacy of all kinds.  This is what our government is spending its money on…..the person they fear is YOU!  And remember!  These are your freinds, family members and neighbors mannng these invasive and unnecessary screenign units! 

%d bloggers like this: