Home

   Democracy or a Republic:  Why America is Neither

Leave a comment


  Author, Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      America is neither a democracy nor a Republic.  It is because in a Democracy or a “representative” Republic, laws will not be affected by corporate elite’s or nonprofit institutional lobbyists, but the country will be fashioned to benefit the people, their life, liberty, and their pursuit of happiness.  If those framers of our Constitution had foresaw the collateral damage that would have arose out of the ashes because of those high rollers of industry, non profits and other treasonous, sinister players within America’s deep state, they would have placed mechanisms within the framework of the Constitution to prevent their concentration of power and sought to protect the people from the present corruption, but also the web of hi-tech surveillance that is already here and is rapidly increasing which will come in the form of a 5G electronic worldwide, wireless network to where more
speed, bondage and intrusion of ones privacy will transpire and freedom will erode.
    Example:  Are the people ready for a car which they may be driving that will automatically send a signal to a police car alerting the officer if your seat belt is attached or not?

More

From John Leckrone: This is public, judicial and constructive notice.

Leave a comment

John Leckrone

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Remember there are only 4 things an all capital letters name can be. 1. A ship. 2. A corporation. 3. A dead body. 4. A slave. Look at all of “YOUR” papers and bills from “government”. JOHN LECKRONE is not me, it is the title to a cestui que vie trust. The social security number is the number to that trust. This is what the corporations are going after. When walking into a courtroom you are walking onto a foreign pirate ship in dry dock and are considered to be all four items listed above. You are considered to be a PERSON with duties and responsibilities and not a man or a woman with unalienable rights.”

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Some people simply cannot handle the truth regarding the police and sheriff’s as being part of a criminal cabal. Most people have convinced themselves with the help of a lot of state run propaganda that the policy enforcement officers (off eye seers) and sheriff’s (shire rives) are the “good” guys.

When people like me point out the nature of the system and that these criminals with costumes, badges and guns are agents of corruption of a country wide extortion racket we are blackballed. Most people are statists who believe that they have benevolent masters. Who makes the best slaves? Those who do not recognize their slave status. Thus they consider us to be crazy when we challenge their deeply held beliefs and expose them to truth.

Yes I am anti “cop” because I know what every one of them are. I have explained it to each of you several times on my timeline here on facebook. Yet that does not make me anti law which is the perception. It makes me anticorruption and antiracketeering. There is a difference between legal and lawful and just because doing something may be illegal that does not necessarily make it unlawful. Also just because something legal under the color of law that does not make it lawful if it is causing harm.

This deeply held conviction of mine sometimes costs me “friends” which is the reason for me now writing this article here. I am tired of being seen as the bad guy because I know the truth and do not worship at the alter of the thin blue line. I refuse to kiss the boots of tyrants acting under the color of law. I instead expose these people in uniform for their crimes in the hopes that maybe one day people will stand together to take back their rights to live in peace instead of fear and perhaps a few of these criminals will change their ways and wake up to their actual job title of mafia enforcer. On that same note though I am very much in favor of peace officers whose only job is to keep the peace and protect people’s unalienable right’s and property. Make absolutely no mistake, sheriff’s and police officers are not peace officers and if asked bluntly will admit this fact.

Finding a man or woman who is actually a peace officer is like looking for a pin in a haystack. Even the “good” cops usually commit several common law felonies every day while “doing their job”. The few people who I have heard about that go out of their way not to plunder from the general population on behalf of their masters find themselves working lousy jobs and passed over for promotions and in some cases even fired. Their “crime” being that of having a conscience and a moral compass.

More

Playing the Global Warming Card

3 Comments

 

 By Cassandra Anderson
February 11, 2011

Homesite: Morphcity.com

Man-made global warming (also known as climate change) claims have been thoroughly discredited by the “scientists” who perpetrated them through leaked e-mails in the ‘Climategate’ scandal. It seems like it should be a dead issue, but the truth is that too many resources have been invested in this scam to allow it to fade away. The global warming myth is thriving internationally, on the federal level and in state and local governments. 

The global warming myth was popularized by Margaret Thatcher (under the influence of a UN depopulation advocate) and was designed to break US power, usher nuclear weapons into the UK and to punish Thatcher’s political enemies.

Carbon dioxide is natural and beneficial to plants. Rises in carbon dioxide follow temperature rise. It is a lie that the cause and effect are the reverse.

Agenda 21 More

USDA GMO Policy

Leave a comment

www.morphcity.com

The USDA co-owns the terminator seed patent with Monsanto.  Who do you think USDA is protecting? You…..or bio-pirates?

What Small Business Wants

Leave a comment

Submitted By Dan Martin

______________________________________________

The most egregious of their useless proposals revolve around the current the tax debate — whether to include the top 2 percent in reversing the Bush tax cuts. The sanctimonious claim is “this would hurt small business” — and this suggestion is incredibly wrong and even detrimental.

__________________________________________________

What small business really wants (it’s not what all those senators claim)
By Myles Spicer | Thursday, Dec. 2, 2010
Recently on TV there was a rerun of a popular movie produced in 2000: “What Women Want,” starring Mel Gibson and Helen Hunt. Very briefly, Gibson has “shocking” experience (literally) and is able to get into the “heads” of women and read their thoughts. Not a great move, but high grossing and of interest to me because it involved an advertising agency — my core profession for over 40 years.

It also coincided with the continuing claims by many members of Congress about what needs to be done to assist small business, who will be the drivers of our economy to get us out of this funk. Frankly their comments are inane, fictional, silly and inept. Why? Because virtually none of them really knows the dynamics of small-business challenges, and consequently do not or cannot get “into the heads” of true small-business people. Frankly, their statements are politically based, and have little to do with reality or an intelligent analytical basis of small business needs. More

Detailed Concerns with S.510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010

Leave a comment

Live Link:  Senator Coburn

Sep 15 2010

Growing an Already Disjointed and Duplicative Federal Government 

In 2008, GAO testified before a House subcommittee that “FDA is one of 15 agencies that collectively administer at least 30 laws related to food safety. This fragmentation is the key reason GAO added the federal oversight of food safety to its High-Risk Series in January 2007 and called for a government wide reexamination of the food safety system. We have reported on problems with this system—including inconsistent oversight, ineffective coordination, and inefficient use of resources.”

Specifically, GAO found that in 2003, FDA and USDA activities included overlapping and duplicative inspections of 1,451 domestic food-processing facilities that produce foods regulated by both agencies. This GAO testimony came on the heels of a 2005 GAO report that identified significant overlap in food safety activities conducted by USDA and the FDA, and to some extent the EPA and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), including “71 interagency agreements [to coordinate overlapping activities] that the agencies entered into… However, the agencies have weak mechanisms for tracking these agreements that…lead to ineffective implementation.” 

This overlap was evident in the egg salmonella scare. The Wall Street Journal reported (USDA Graders Saw Bugs and Trash at Egg Producer; Didn’t Tell FDA) that U.S. Department of Agriculture experts knew about sanitary problems at one of the two Iowa farms at the center of a massive nationwide egg recall, but did not notify health authorities.) USDA inspects farms and gives eggs their “Grade A” label, while the FDA technically is tasked with the safety of the final egg product.

This discrepancy was the impetus behind an egg safety rule originally promulgated 10 years ago by the FDA. Unfortunately, three administrations sat on the proposed rule without finalizing and implementing it. FDA Commissioner Dr. Hamburg stated, “We believe that had these rules been in place at an earlier time, it would have very likely enabled us to identify the problems on this farm before this kind of outbreak occurred.” A lack of regulatory bill isn’t the problem.

Charging the Bill to our Children and Grandchildren  More

The US Congress: “misbranded and adulterated”

2 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

________________________________________

                                                     S.3767 (or is it S.3669? Has the number changed   yet again?)

In reading this “companion bill” to S.510, one has to wonder: 

Isn’t this Rosa Delauro’s HR 875 come to life?  Fines imprisonment and all?

Does this mean the FDA is actually going to force the labeling of genetically modified contaminated foods? 

Would not the inclusion of substantially altered food products, alterations which were so diverse a patent was issued on them…..wouldn’t these qualify as misbranded and adulterated if the label does not specify what genetic alterations had been made and how much of the product on the shelf was made up of unnatural food-like creations?

Would the selling of cloned meats also qualify for misbranded and adulterated if the label does not state the product is the result of cloning? That the meat does not come from natural processes?

Will labels on meat and dairy products now state that they contain the residuals from antibiotics, vaccines and hormones? What about the labels on grain products?  Will the labels now list the level of residual herbicides and pesticides present in the finished food-like product?

Will labels now include the information that eating genetically altered food could harm your health and that independent studies have shown damage to internal organs, fertility and DNA may result from consuming genetically altered food-like products?

Will gene slicing between plants and animals now be indicated on labels?  Will we know, for example, if the strawberry’s that look so appetizing are really just strawberry’s, or, are they a combination of strawberry and swine? Will the label now read “Pigberry’s”?  I’d like to know! More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: