Johnson & Johnson to test COVID vaccine on infants

1 Comment


Days after the FDA authorized J&J’s COVID vaccine for emergency use, the company announced plans to test the vaccine on newborns, despite the vaccine’s risks and strong evidence that COVID poses virtually no risk to healthy children.
Wed Mar 3, 2021 – 7:00 am EST

March 3, 2021 (Children’s Health Defense) — On Friday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization for Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) COVID vaccine, paving the way for the one-shot vaccine to be administered beginning this week.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also recommended the vaccine for people 18 and older. On Sunday, J&J revealed plans to test its one-shot vaccine on infants, including newborns, pregnant women and the immunocompromised. The expanded clinical trials were laid out in the company’s application for emergency use approval and in briefing materials provided to the FDA and discussed briefly during the meeting.

According to the New York Times, the plan for expanded clinical trials met the approval of Dr. Ofer Levy, director of the Precision Vaccines Program at Harvard’s Boston Children’s Hospital and a member of the FDA’s advisory committee that reviewed the company’s vaccine data.

When Levy saw the outlines of the planned trials, he said: “They did not get into a lot of detail about it but did make it clear they will be pursuing pediatric and maternal coronavirus immunization studies.”

A spokesperson for Janssen Biotech, a J&J subsidiary, confirmed the company plans to extend clinical trials to children –– first to children between the ages of 12 and 18, and immediately after to newborns and adolescents, then to pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals.   Continue reading here

Vaccines: the new government attack on pregnant women

Leave a comment

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Ferocious vaccine manufacturers are constantly on the move, looking for new “demographics” to shoot with vaccines. If they could stick a needle into a rock and get paid for it, they would find a reason to do it.

But in this case, we’re talking about pregnant women.

Protection, protection, protection—that’s the cover the government keeps pushing.

Meanwhile, the vaccines they’re foisting on pregnant women have a track record of damage.

Barbara Loe Fisher, head of the National Vaccine Information Center, has the story, so I’ll let her tell it. These are excerpts from her testimony before the Nov. 13, 2015 “meeting of the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on proposed changes to FDA requirements for licensure of vaccines intended for use during pregnancy”:

Fisher (“FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women,” 11/17/2016):

“In 2006, CDC officials directed doctors to give all pregnant women a flu shot and, in 2011, a Tdap shot during every pregnancy, no matter how little time has elapsed between pregnancies. Prior to FDA licensure, influenza, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines [Tdap and flu shots] were not tested in or proven safe and effective for pregnant women in large clinical trials when given during every pregnancy either singly or simultaneously.”

“Categorized by FDA as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because it is not known whether the vaccines are genotoxic and can cause fetal harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction, administering influenza and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women is an off-label use of these vaccines. It is a policy that assumes maternal vaccination is necessary, safe and effective without proving it.”

Read more here


Elite Wreckage Spotted Along the Information Super Highway

1 Comment

By W. R, McAfee, Sr.

Copyright © by W. R. McAfee, Sr.  All rights reserved.

“Well, a National Coalition of Women’s (NCOW) press release on September 17 says the CDC failed to inform the vax manufacturers of the larger number of  miscarriages and stillborns that were occurring among pregnant women who took the vaccine. Initially thought to be 1,588, the number eventually reached 3,587, according to the release.”


As long as people have access to the free exchange of (Internet) information, the boys behind the curtain will have to keep scrambling.  Their dark side is now common knowledge, thanks to the ‘Net; which simultaneously has exposed the dearth of good men willing to indict these criminals.

The Constitution and the rule of law has been renewed in the minds of Americans who’ve taken the time to inform themselves and grapple with the enormity of the monsters behind the havoc wrought upon humanity for profit.

The bird is on the wing now, though, thanks to the web.

That’s why Oz keeps trying to establish its own laws (codex alimentarius), courts (international), appointed government (in The Hague), and a central world bank and currency (Basel, Switzerland) 

Don’t blame them.  I wouldn’t want to be sitting in front of an honest judge or jury either in the U.S., having done what they’ve done.  9/11 would be a good starter.  The evidence is irrefutable. Send the first to prison or the gurney and the canary chorus would sound like a Tabernacle Choir.

The law used not to worry Oz. They kicked an Oklahoma grand juror off the panel who questioned the government’s version of how the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City was brought down. And they obfuscated the Ryder truck bombing of the. . .South Tower was it?  Even when an informant called to let his government handlers know it was going to happen.

No, nary a peep from their propaganda outlets.

No wonder they thought people would fall in line with their 9/11 false flagger; not realizing the cumulative impact the Net was having on people’s minds between “events.”

The Internet is like a good boxer’s jab.  At first it seems unimportant to the scheme of things, but round after round it begins to take its toll on unwary opponents until finally, in the latter rounds, the recipient’s  legs start to wobble. More

%d bloggers like this: