Home

How the Pro-Vaccine Movement Created a Public Health Crisis

9 Comments

new-logo25Marti Oakley

______________________________________________________________________

Please be considerate: If you vaccinate, please self quarantine for a period of no less than 21 days until the virus(es) you were intentionally infected with have stopped shedding.

The High Cost of One-size-Fits-All Vaccines

If I were to give a child food laced with formaldehyde, aluminum salts, squalene, thimerisol, or any of the other hundreds of chemicals used in vaccines, or intentionally exposed them to disease, you would come unglued at the seams and demand that I be hung publicly.

Then why do we allow pharmaceutical companies to create cocktails out of these chemicals and viruses, and many others and then have our doctors inject them into our children?

If it would be dangerous and life-threatening for you or I to do this, why would it not be equally as dangerous when they do it?

The cost of autism has reached 303 billion annually. 1 of 55 children now are autistic. 1 of 6 children now have asthma and other chronic allergies.

As this book demonstrates, the number of immune related disorders, such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, is growing substantially. All of these disorders have been linked by careful studies to vaccines. Vaccine Safety Manual  by Neil Z. Miller. (Preface)

A personal decision to vaccinate has public consequences. It means that you and/or your children are now activley incubating the virus(es) you were injected with.

Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe

Your decision to get vaccinated means others and the government must bear the costs of your decision in terms of paying for additional healthcare expenditures including long term care and treatments, to treat themselves or deal with the costs of your decision.

Personal choices to vaccinate do not mean that individuals have assumed responsibility for vaccine injuries that may result in life-long chronic illnesses to themselves or their children. Once injury occurs, these parents and families turn to public resources to pay the expense of the injury, many times for a life time. The pharmaceutical companies are not going to contribute one dime, and your doctor surely is not.

Parents who opt to vaccinate their children are asking the public to bear the cost of their decisions. In choosing to vaccinate, parents have made an irrevocable and irreversible decision about their children’s health. Once these toxic chemicals are injected into the bloodstream, there is no retrieving them: the damage is done.

As a result of vaccines, wild viruses mutate and become more virulent. New mutated strains of disease occur first in the vaccinated population and then spread to the non-vaccinated. The much hyped vaccine induced [herd immunity] is not possible as long as the mutations can and do occur. The virus will simply continue to mutate in response to the vaccines. Nature cannot be so easily controlled.

Many vaccines cultured from monkey cells or other non-related species, contain wild viruses that do not harm the originating specie, but which do become active once injected into the human body. As and example; The Simian virus 40, found in the Sabin and Salk polio vaccines that is now known to cause cancer. This has resulted in the epidemic of soft tissue cancers in 50 and 60 year old’s as was predicted would happen back in the 60’s.

From Vaccine Epidemic:
In other words, vaccine programs often do not eliminate a disease; they simply rearrange its occurrence, causing it to mutate, or rise in related areas. (page 282 para 1)

While experts claimed that the wild virus measles had been eradicated in 2000, I am wondering just how they decided this? The recent outbreak that was claimed to have originated at Disneyland appeared first in vaccinated children, then spread to others. How is this possible if the virus was eradicated and vaccines actually work?

The right to refuse

Also to be considered is personal liberty. That and the intrusion on your person by state interests who are financially profiting from the vaccines and who continue to contract with pharmaceutical companies and the federal government to obtain grants and subsidies, creating a conflict of interest at the public’s expense. These same state interests refuse to look at any evidence about the damage caused by vaccines even though volumes of it exist and even though they are fully aware of its existence.

Mandatory vaccines when weighed against the public good cannot be balanced with financial interests that are willing to risk you or your child to obtain financial benefit in light of the known risks and the rising rate of known injuries and death.

Until the monetary incentives to force vaccinations is eliminated, and until the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers come clean on what they really do know about vaccines, and stop hiding reports, studies and other information about the down side of vaccinations of all kinds, let us all err on the side of caution and not tempt the fates. Vaccines are not the answer. Not as they exist now.
_______________________________________________________

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/cdc-caught-hiding-data-showing-mercury-in-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

http://doctormarysmonkey.com/

www.thinktwice.com/vsm.htm

http://www.focusforhealth.org/how-toxins-are-changing-childhood/

[2010 Nov] Giving babies Calpol or other forms of paracetamol ‘doubles the risk of them developing asthma and allergies’
[2008 Oct] A vaccine given to babies could increase the risk of childhood asthma
[30 Jan 2008] U of M researcher links asthma, early vaccinations
[Jan 2008] The Federal Government recently conceded a real vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court

Autism-Vaccine Cover-up Snowballs as Whistleblower’s Identity is Revealed—LATEST UPDATES

4 Comments

strip bannerlogo-new
August 26, 2014

Vaccine-Autism link whistleblower revealed

Rumors are swirling as the world learns of the government’s deception. Here’s what we know for sure.

William W. Thompson, PhD—an epidemiologist at the CDC’s National Center of Birth Defects and Development Disabilities who received his doctorate in biochemical engineering—has been revealed as the CDC whistleblower. Thompson broke a decade of silence over the government’s deliberate concealment of the link between the MMR vaccine (for measles, mumps, and rubella) and a dramatically increased risk of autism, particularly in African American boys.

Thompson is alleging criminal wrongdoing on the part of his supervisors, and has expressed deep regret about his role in helping the CDC hide data: “It’s the lowest point in checking vaccine 25my career, that I went along with that paper.”

Here is a quick timeline of the scandal:
•In February 2004, a study of the MMR vaccine was published in the journal Pediatrics by three CDC scientists working in the National Immunization Program; one of them was Dr. Thompson. The study, in which vaccine data was gathered on 2,583 children in metropolitan Atlanta born between 1986 and 1993, concluded that there were “no significant associations” between the age at which the vaccine is administered and the incidence of “developmental regression” such as autism. This study has been used for the past decade by the those seeking to say there is no link between autism and vaccines. It should be noted that Pediatrics receives financial support from vaccine makers through advertising and direct donations, according to a CBS News report.
•That same month, Dr. Thompson wrote to Dr. Julie Gerberding (then director of the CDC, now director of Merck’s vaccine division). In this letter he discusses his intention to present, at an Institute of Medicine meeting on vaccines and autism the following week, “several problematic results” that the Atlanta study had produced. More

Marijuana – Reefer Madness or Cure-all?

Leave a comment

bud

By Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

December 20, 2009

Controversy surrounding the use of marijuana, whether it is for recreational or medical purposes, is heating up.

The first state to legalize marijuana for medical purposes, California leads the country in decriminalizing the sale and use of cannabis. Other states are considering the issue… Now, a new initiative that will allow local governments to oversee and regulate cultivation, distribution, and sales – and to determine how and how much cannabis can be bought and sold within area limits – will be on the November 2010 ballot. National advocates say that regardless of the vote – signature gathering went fast and easy, according to reports – a major corner has been turned in national acceptance of marijuana use. (CSMonitor)

The real question is, why should a harmless plant that anyone can grow at home elicit such controversy. Why does the government care? Why criminalize it in the first place, and then keep it under control by regulating it after determining that people are going to use it anyway? The answer might lie here: READ MORE…

The Pharmaceutical Industry’s Unpleasant Hand in Health and Food Bills

2 Comments

by Patrick Henning                                                 Tell a Friend 

Robert Pear wrote an astounding article in the NY Times on Genetech’s influence on the healthcare bill, writing talking points for both sides of the aisle.  He proved Anthony Sutton’s proposition – that those with power simply use the left and right divide to get what they want, even setting it up.

And that global elite seems to working now through the pharmaceutical industry and bankers to gain power.  Interestingly, it was the pharmaceutical and chemical giant, IG Farben, which destabilized Germany, put Hitler in, and was the primary support for the 3rd Reich.  And the Rockefellers, oilmen and bankers with a focus on eugenics (genetic engineering), had a half interest in IG Farben and IG Farben a half interest in Standard Oil. More

Newer Entries

%d bloggers like this: