Home

The Religious Cult of Medicine

5 Comments

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Although a small minority of us don’t think of them and their vocation in this way, medical doctors and the profession of medicine are perceived by the vast majority of people as priests working in a church. The entire structure of the medical profession has been intentionally designed to mirror a religious experience.

When you walk into a house of worship, you enter a domain that is considered sacred by the members of the congregation. Inside a church, temple, synagogue or any other religious chamber, there are specific rules that are generally understood and followed by its members. Out of respect for the belief system, any types of criticism, skepticism or questions concerning the veracity of the organization’s major premise are off limits. In other words, members of religious congregations can never publicly question the church about anything.

In medicine, the doctor (priest, minister, rabbi) customarily wears a white gown (robe) that absolutely identifies him as the high priest in the congregation (practice). Within that practice there are nurses (nuns) that assist the doctor in taking care of patients (members of the congregation) when they become ill (possessed by evil microbes). Patients do not usually question  a doctor’s (minister’s) advice.

There are a variety of techniques (rituals) the profession of medicine uses to rid the body of diseases (evil spirits). Some of these techniques include introducing synthetic drugs (holy water) in patients, mass produced by petrochemical companies. In other situations, doctors cut out diseases in the body by performing surgeries (exorcisms) in an effort to remove infected tissues and organs (possessed body parts).

Question the intentions or integrity of the medical man and his large support group of medical personnel, and you will be looked upon by the citizens of most communities as a nut job (the devil). Question the medical protocols (biblical passages) that have been written by the petrochemical corporations and firmly established within the base curricula of every medical school program in the world, and you will be labeled as a charlatan, a quack or a pseudo-scientist. More

Big Pharma Controls Congress

Leave a comment

20170612_1237001484777566.png

By Dr. John Reizer

If you want to absolutely control the outcome of a sports event, you have to control all the players involved on both teams as well as the referees officiating the contest. You leave nothing to chance. You buy off everyone and everything that could possibly prevent you from achieving the results you’re looking for.

This scenario is what’s been happening for years with regards to healthcare in the United States. Big pharmaceutical companies have secured financial control over the media, lawmakers, Congress and everyone else in the game.

If you are naive enough to believe that healthcare regulating agencies are looking out for the public’s best interests, think again. They’ve been bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry. They’re in complete control of everything and there’s not much that anyone can possibly do to reverse the situation except possibly to educate yourself about health and the logic of human physiology. It’s a daunting task, but your life and the lives of your children depend on your efforts. Good luck!

Merck & Company and Big Pharma’s Nefarious Search for Profits An Example of how a Small-Town German Apothecary Shop Morphed into a Greedy Multinational Corporation that Disregards Ethical Principles

3 Comments

Duty to Warn

By Gary G. Kohls, MD – December 11, 2018 (3,141 words)

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“A number of other drug companies paid over a billion dollars in punitive settlements over that same span. Below is a list of seven of the most expensive ones. That list doesn’t include the dozens of other Big Pharma corporations that paid out lesser, “just-the-cost-of-doing-business” payments that were only in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

  • GlaxoSmithKline: $7.63 billion
  • Pfizer: $3.46 billion
  • Johnson & Johnson: $2.82 billion
  • Abbott: $1.82 billion
  • Eli Lilly: $1.71 billion
  • Teva: $1.47 billion
  • Novartis: $1.23 billion”

____________________________________________________________________________

One of the oldest and biggest pharmaceutical companies on the planet is New Jersey-based Merck & Company (known outside the US as MSD – short for Merck, Sharp & Dohme). Merck was once a German company (now international, with its head offices in the US) that is, technically speaking, 350 years old this year. Given its recent stock prices, it is having a happy birthday year ($55 per share last spring and $80 per share a few days ago).

Merck & Co was born when Friedrich Jacob Merck bought a small apothecary shop in Darmstadt, Germany in 1668. Friedrich’s shop sold the usual items of his era, including tobacco, wine, spices, herbal “remedies” and any other products that his customers regarded as potentially healing agents. Apothecaries were the precursors of modern-day pharmacies. The owners frequently dispensed medical advice, although they were not licensed physicians.

In 1827 – a century and a half later – one of Friedrich’s heirs, Heinrich Emmanuel Merck, converted the pharmacy into a drug manufacturing facility – and the rest, as they say, is history. Among the first products that Merck manufactured and marketed were the highly-addictive substances cocaine and the two early natural opioids, morphine and codeine. They were all over-the-counter drugs at the time.

Interestingly, Viennese psychiatrist Sigmoid Freud had a Merck connection in that he helped promote their cocaine drug when Sigmund discovered that the drug was a powerful “anti-depressant” (or at least it made him “euphoric” or capable of causing a predictable drug-induced mania). Freud’s support lasted only until the day he realized how addictive Merck’s cocaine turned out to be. More

Exposing psychiatry as a fraud from top to bottom

1 Comment

by Jon Rappoport

Jon Rappopor’s Blog

Exposing psychiatry as a fraud from top to bottom

Note: This is an expanded version of my recent piece about psychiatry. It contains far more evidence that psychiatry is a highly dangerous fraud.

By Jon Rappoport

“Promoting diabolically false science, psychiatry creates a gateway for defining many separate states of consciousness that don’t exist at all. They’re cheap myths, fairy tales.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Regardless of what you think of Donald Trump, the deployment of psychiatrists to diagnose a person they oppose on political grounds is a tactic—not science.

In some cases, psychiatrists give favored individuals a soft landing—“Well, he’s suffering from bipolar and he needs help straightening out his life”—while in other cases these shrinks use their diagnoses to discredit and diminish public figures—“his judgment is impaired, pay no attention to what he’s saying, he needs treatment (toxic drugs).”

It’s the old USSR strategy, with a few cultural twists to fit the American landscape.

It’s time to lay out the facts about psychiatry, to show how bankrupt this “science” really is.

Wherever you see organized psychiatry operating, you see it trying to expand its domain and its dominance. The Hippocratic Oath to do no harm? Are you kidding?

The first question to ask is: do these mental disorders have any scientific basis? There are now roughly 300 of them. They multiply like fruit flies.

An open secret has been bleeding out into public consciousness for the past ten years.

THERE ARE NO DEFINITIVE LABORATORY TESTS FOR ANY SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDER.

No blood tests, no urine tests, no saliva tests, no brain scans, no genetic assays.

And along with that:

More

OxyContin: Profiting from the Pain of Others

1 Comment

Dr. John L. Reizer

It’s been estimated by some sources that 80 percent of all drug addicts begin their habits by taking prescription painkillers. For far too long, aggressive drug campaigns, pushing addictive painkillers, have been marketed by pharmaceutical companies directly to healthcare professionals and hospitals.

Lavish vacations to exotic destinations for medical professionals that included seminars on how to control the pain of patients through the use of prescription drugs have contributed to an epidemic number of people becoming helplessly addicted to opiates.

More

What Journalists, Lawyers, Laypersons and Healthcare Providers Need to Know About the Connections Between Psychotropic Drugs and Irrational Acts of Violence

2 Comments

new-logo25By Gary G. Kohls, MD – 4-6-15

______________________________________________________________

Connections Between Psychotropic Drugs and Irrational Acts of Violence

“Even at normal doses, taking psychiatric drugs can produce suicidal thinking, violent behavior, aggressiveness, extreme anger, hostility, irritability, loss of ability to control impulses, rage reactions, hallucinations, mania, acute psychotic episodes, akathisia, and bizarre, grandiose, highly elaborated destructive plans, including mass murder.

“Withdrawal from psychiatric drugs can cause agitation, severe depression, hallucinations, aggressiveness, hypomania, akathisia, fear, terror, panic, fear of insanity, failing self-confidence, restlessness, irritability, aggression, an urge to destroy and, in the worst cases, an urge to kill.” – From “Drug Studies Connecting Psychotropic Drugs with Acts of Violence” – unpublished.

Last week’s Duty to Warn column discussed the frustration of large numbers of aware observers around pillhead-500-x-469the world that were certain that Andreas Lubitz, the suicidal mass murderer of 149 passengers and crew members of the of the Lufthansa airliner crash, was under the intoxicating influence of brain-disabling, brain-altering, psychotropic medicines that had been prescribed for him by his German psychiatrists and/or neurologists who were known to have been prescribing for him.

These inquiring folks wanted and needed to know precisely what drugs he had been taking or withdrawing from so that the event could become a teachable moment that would help explain what had really happened and then possibly prevent other “irrational” acts from happening in the future. For the first week after the crash, the “authorities” were closed mouthed about the specifics, but most folks were willing to wait a bit to find out the truth.

However, another week has gone by, and there has still been no revelations from the “authorities” as to the exact medications, exact doses, exact combinations of drugs, who were the prescribing clinics and physicians and what was the rationale for the drugs having been prescribed. Inquiring minds want to know and they deserve to be informed.

There are probably plenty of reasons why the information is not being revealed. There are big toes that could be stepped on, especially the giant pharmaceutical industries. There are medico-legal implications for the physicians and clinics that did the prescribing and there are serious implications for the airline corporations because their industry is at high risk of losing consumer confidence in their products if the truth isn’t adequately covered up. And the loss of consumer confidence is a great concern for both the pharmaceutical industry and its indoctrinated medical providers More

How the Pro-Vaccine Movement Created a Public Health Crisis

9 Comments

new-logo25Marti Oakley

______________________________________________________________________

Please be considerate: If you vaccinate, please self quarantine for a period of no less than 21 days until the virus(es) you were intentionally infected with have stopped shedding.

The High Cost of One-size-Fits-All Vaccines

If I were to give a child food laced with formaldehyde, aluminum salts, squalene, thimerisol, or any of the other hundreds of chemicals used in vaccines, or intentionally exposed them to disease, you would come unglued at the seams and demand that I be hung publicly.

Then why do we allow pharmaceutical companies to create cocktails out of these chemicals and viruses, and many others and then have our doctors inject them into our children?

If it would be dangerous and life-threatening for you or I to do this, why would it not be equally as dangerous when they do it?

The cost of autism has reached 303 billion annually. 1 of 55 children now are autistic. 1 of 6 children now have asthma and other chronic allergies.

As this book demonstrates, the number of immune related disorders, such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, is growing substantially. All of these disorders have been linked by careful studies to vaccines. Vaccine Safety Manual  by Neil Z. Miller. (Preface)

A personal decision to vaccinate has public consequences. It means that you and/or your children are now activley incubating the virus(es) you were injected with.

Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe

Your decision to get vaccinated means others and the government must bear the costs of your decision in terms of paying for additional healthcare expenditures including long term care and treatments, to treat themselves or deal with the costs of your decision.

Personal choices to vaccinate do not mean that individuals have assumed responsibility for vaccine injuries that may result in life-long chronic illnesses to themselves or their children. Once injury occurs, these parents and families turn to public resources to pay the expense of the injury, many times for a life time. The pharmaceutical companies are not going to contribute one dime, and your doctor surely is not.

Parents who opt to vaccinate their children are asking the public to bear the cost of their decisions. In choosing to vaccinate, parents have made an irrevocable and irreversible decision about their children’s health. Once these toxic chemicals are injected into the bloodstream, there is no retrieving them: the damage is done.

As a result of vaccines, wild viruses mutate and become more virulent. New mutated strains of disease occur first in the vaccinated population and then spread to the non-vaccinated. The much hyped vaccine induced [herd immunity] is not possible as long as the mutations can and do occur. The virus will simply continue to mutate in response to the vaccines. Nature cannot be so easily controlled.

Many vaccines cultured from monkey cells or other non-related species, contain wild viruses that do not harm the originating specie, but which do become active once injected into the human body. As and example; The Simian virus 40, found in the Sabin and Salk polio vaccines that is now known to cause cancer. This has resulted in the epidemic of soft tissue cancers in 50 and 60 year old’s as was predicted would happen back in the 60’s.

From Vaccine Epidemic:
In other words, vaccine programs often do not eliminate a disease; they simply rearrange its occurrence, causing it to mutate, or rise in related areas. (page 282 para 1)

While experts claimed that the wild virus measles had been eradicated in 2000, I am wondering just how they decided this? The recent outbreak that was claimed to have originated at Disneyland appeared first in vaccinated children, then spread to others. How is this possible if the virus was eradicated and vaccines actually work?

The right to refuse

Also to be considered is personal liberty. That and the intrusion on your person by state interests who are financially profiting from the vaccines and who continue to contract with pharmaceutical companies and the federal government to obtain grants and subsidies, creating a conflict of interest at the public’s expense. These same state interests refuse to look at any evidence about the damage caused by vaccines even though volumes of it exist and even though they are fully aware of its existence.

Mandatory vaccines when weighed against the public good cannot be balanced with financial interests that are willing to risk you or your child to obtain financial benefit in light of the known risks and the rising rate of known injuries and death.

Until the monetary incentives to force vaccinations is eliminated, and until the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers come clean on what they really do know about vaccines, and stop hiding reports, studies and other information about the down side of vaccinations of all kinds, let us all err on the side of caution and not tempt the fates. Vaccines are not the answer. Not as they exist now.
_______________________________________________________

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/cdc-caught-hiding-data-showing-mercury-in-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

http://doctormarysmonkey.com/

www.thinktwice.com/vsm.htm

http://www.focusforhealth.org/how-toxins-are-changing-childhood/

[2010 Nov] Giving babies Calpol or other forms of paracetamol ‘doubles the risk of them developing asthma and allergies’
[2008 Oct] A vaccine given to babies could increase the risk of childhood asthma
[30 Jan 2008] U of M researcher links asthma, early vaccinations
[Jan 2008] The Federal Government recently conceded a real vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: