Home

Obama & Panetta v The US Constitution

5 Comments

Marti Oakley     © Copyright 2012     All Rights Reserved  **See Reservations below.

_______________________________________________________________________

Will the real terrorists please stand up?

Barack Obama, Chief Executive of the corporation operating as “The United States”, has joined forces with Leon Panetta, head of the Department of Defense in attempting to have the May 15th, 2012 ruling of Judge Katherine B Forest overturned. Judge Forest issued a 69 page ruling regarding the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) . This was the legislative attack on several constitutional rights and protections passed by Democrats and Republicans alike in 2011. On December 31, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the 2012 act into law. The May 15 ruling temporarily blocks the NDAA, and section 1021 in particular.

In June the Obama Administration contacted Judge Forest and demanded that she reverse her ruling of May 15. The Judge refused. The government’s argument was that the plaintiff’s who were afraid of being disappeared into the abyss of the police state, had no standing because the government had not yet kidnaped them and stashed them away never to be heard from again. Which of course would have solved any problems associated with future lawsuits as once they were disappeared there is no way they would ever see the light of day in a court room to establish their “standing”.

Section 1021 of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. by military or Homeland Terrorism agents on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S.

It appears obvious to me that those engaged in hostilities against the US reside inside the District of Criminals. It seems that no one is more hostile to, or more engaged in hostile activities against the nation than the very agencies and government agents that the NDAA empowers.

How could an unconstitutional law such as this, have been passed unless those voting for it were actively and openly hostile towards the country and people who would be affected by it? That would be the House and Senate and the target would be us, the citizens.

Who are the real terrorists here? More

Panetta, Dempsey and treason: And Congress did nothing

28 Comments

 Marti Oakley Copyright 2012

_____________________________________________________________________

The recent statements by Leon Panetta and joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, to the effect that they are under no obligation to the Congress to seek their permission to start wars.  Both Panetta and Dempsey claim their authority comes from the United Nations and NATO.  These were clear and unambiguous declarations of submission to foreign governments, agencies and organizations and ended with the dismissing of the Constitution as not applicable to them or their decisions. I have to wonder why both men were not frog-marched out of the meeting and straight to jail.  But then, we are talking about the District of Criminals here and we know it is rare that anyone from the District ever goes to jail no matter how anti-American, unlawful or unconstitutional or treasonous their activities or views.

Both men did however, say they might inform congress

Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”

The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.”

So, if I understand this correctly: They would seek permission from non-US entities and then if they thought it was any business of the United States as to how our military would be used…….they would make a decision as to whether or not they would “want” to get permission from Congress?  And these two are actually still walking around free?

Note:  My goal would be to see Panetta and Dempsey both tried for treason and publicly hung.  International permission be damned and congress along with it. 

I believe it was this moment in time that Senator Sessions and his companions in the meeting realized that they were being given notice that their services were no longer needed.  Panetta and Dempsey publicly, effectively declared that Congress was of no further use.  More

%d bloggers like this: