Home

TS Radio: TnT Tanya TalkS..more on the”pill mill” doctor defendants

1 Comment

Join us Sunday evening, April 22, 2018, at 6:00 pm CST!

4:00 pm PST 5:00 pm MST6:00 pm CST …7:00 pm EST

Listen Live HERE!

Call in # 917-388-4520

Hosted by Tanya Hathaway

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TUNE IN~~~ THE “PILL MILL” DOCTOR DEFENDANTS SPEAK UP-ALONGSIDE THOSE ADVOCATING FOR THE SEEMINGLY WRONGFULLY ACCUSED DR. JENKINS!

 

The untold story of the accused- continues to unfold.

Set your alarms for the continued saga on the staggering two-hour show this Sunday, April 22nd at: 4 pm Pacific, 5 pm Mountain, 6 pm Central,7 pm Eastern in to Tanya Hathaway’s TNT Tanya Talks, Where your voice is heard, and your story is told!” produced by and on Marti-Oakley’s TS Radio Show.

We continue to unravel yet-another state of corruption by the state of Oklahoma as we continue to talk the alleged victim-defendants who’s accounting of the practice and the raid that changed their lives-all seem to be telling the same story- but the state’s story is more like musical chairs!

Mike Oxely, who faces 800 years, will join us again as he has pioneered his voice with this forum, along with another Defenant, Toshanda Dixon, Dr. Harvy Jenkins sister, Harvette Carmel, Jenkins-Bah, and one of Dr. Jenkins closest friends, Mark Reese.

We will take a few calls if you are a past patient of the now closed down pain clinic.

To listen on the internet, log on to blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley and sign up for a free account so you can listen in and request to be alerted for any of her shows. Or, you can call 917-388-4520 to listen in! If you would like to speak with the host, press 1.

Advertisements

TS Radio: TnT Tanya TalkS with Mike Oxely…PART 2

1 Comment

Join us this Sunday evening April 15, 2018 at 6:00 pm CST! More

TS Radio: TnT Tanya TalkS

Leave a comment

Join us Sunday evening March 4, 2018 at 6:00 pm CST! More

TS Radio: TnT Tanya TalkS Injustice in Oklahoma

Leave a comment

Join us Wednesday evening February 28, 2018 at 6:00 CST!

More

TS Radio: TNT Tanya TalkS

1 Comment

Join us Sunday evening February 11, 2018 at 6:00 CST!

4:00 pm PST… 5:00 pm MST … 6:00 pm CST …7:00 pm EST

Listen live HERE!!

Call in # 917-388-4520

Hosted by Tanya Hathaway

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The time is now. It’s time to say no. How many lives must end in prisons and county jails –without any true answers. No autopsy, suspicious lapses of time before the bodies are sent home-and families mortified and grief stricken – expected to accept how their loved ones perished?

This week’s show is the beginning of the movement that will reveal the truth behind what’s really going on behind the brick walls.

Pahoua Lor, California attorney and cousin of the young man pictured here, along with many family members; have made a commitment to see Justice for Justin-and others-through. I’m with them.

“His death will not be in vain” Pahoua shared with me.

Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable…Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.”  — Martin Luther King Jr.

Going forward- on this subject we will be opening up the lines to take calls specifically on this subject. We want to hear from you. We want to know what you know. We are in this together and are building a tenacious group that will assure justice will be served.

This Sunday, February 11, 2018

https://ppjg.me/

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley

It will also be on Injustice In Oklahoma EXPOSED fb page.

TS Radio: Tanya TalkS…AN EPIDEMIC: OKLAHOMA’S VIOLENT DEATHS UPON WOMEN

4 Comments

Join us this evening February 4, 2018 at 6:00 pm CST!

4:00 pm PST … 5:00 pm MST … 6:00 pm CST …  8:00 pm

Listen Live HERE!

CAllin # 917-388-4520

Hosted by Tanya Hathaway

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Emily Morgan; a voice not forgotten; forever embedded & making a difference~

Two lives were abruptly stolen from their loving families and their innocent children on August 26th, 2016.

The perpetrator remains at large a year and a half later. This heart-wrenching story will not be in vain as Kim Merryman, mother of one of the victims, is determined to carry on her daughter Emily’s voice as she lived and flourished, and crusaded through life with zealous determination and passion each and every day.

Emily, just 23, and Totinkika Elix 24, were close friends, and on that fateful day; they left this earth under vile and brutal circumstances; a double homicide.

Emily exuded enthusiasm and positive energy to her friends and acquaintances; but mostly to her son Payden, as she worked tirelessly to make a better life for him. She was just so close… just so close -to being over the fence on her path.

We will discuss the startling statistics about women in Oklahoma and how Kim is pushing through and shining a light wherever she goes and whatever she does. This valiant mother (now guardian of her grandson will share (what she can) about the day she wishes was simply a bad dream She will relive part of the nightmare with our listeners and dangers that her daughter faced many brave and yet some bold decisions-and at the cost of her life. Kim is now dedicated to saving many others as “Be Her Voice” is launched and alive.

 

REWARD: Tips & Information about the case; call 800-522-8017 or email tips@osbi.ok.gov.

Pictured top left: Emily Morgan; pictured top right: Emily & her pride and joy- Payden; Pictured middle left: Emily Morgan and her beautiful Mother, Kim Merryman~

 

New Hampshire Woman Takes on Oklahoma- and a Moot Court

Leave a comment

Written by: Michael Volpe and Tanya Hathaway

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s All About Jurisdiction

A judgment from a court that did not have subject-matter jurisdiction is forever a nullity.[1][2] Wikipedia

With a corrupt judge refusing to remove himself from the case, he had no problem ignoring the evidence that the court had no jurisdiction.

A court must have some sort of a stake in a case before it can hear it; that’s called Subject-matter jurisdiction.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 PROVING SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION

Proper implementation of Subject–matter jurisdiction prevents judge shopping or forum shopping.

Some of a few of the many exhibits Hathaway presented for supporting arguments for lack of Subject-matter jurisdiction include: 1) Their marital home was in New Hampshire. Hathaway never lived in Oklahoma, and XXX (referring to Hathaway’s estranged husband) wasn’t living in Tulsa County.  XXX swore their marital home as his legal residence when he applied for a P.O. box, 2) XXX obtained a New Hampshire’s driver’s license on June 27th 2014- just weeks before filing- where he swore that he lived in New Hampshire, 3) Their marriage certificate listed New Hampshire as their legal address 4) Confirmation from the US Postal Service (USPS) that XXX permanently changed his home address from Tulsa to New Hampshire 5) dozens of resumes which XXX sent to potential employers where his return address was New Hampshire  6) While Hathaway examined XXX for her motion to vacate the suit due to lack of jurisdiction, he admitted that he did not have a residence or stay anywhere in Tulsa County during the time period required to claim Subject-matter jurisdiction.  Clearly, he relied on his insiders to take care of things.

Miller, during an argument with XXX’s attorney, even threw Hathaway a bone, saying, “I don’t understand why a driver’s licenses would not be admissible to go to evidence of where a person’s residence is in a hearing on Subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Judge Miller noted that Subject-matter jurisdiction came down to, “was the petitioner a resident of Oklahoma for six months prior to filing the petition?”

When XXX testified, he insisted that he was domiciled- or had a residence in-Oklahoma at the time he filed his petition in June 2014, but when asked to provide his address, he responded, “I did not have a formal address in Tulsa.”

He even repeated this assertion when Miller asked him the same question minutes later.

 JUDICIAL ESTOPPEL

Just as XXX knew he could rely on Hughes and Hastings, lawyers on XXX’s behalf, Hughes knew they could rely on Miller to make it all work. All they needed was something with the veneer of legitimacy: thinking Hathaway didn’t know better. Judicial Estoppel is a legal technicality which “prevents a party from asserting a position in one legal proceeding that directly contradicts a position taken by that same party in an earlier proceeding.According to the Cornell Law Review.

Hughes and her team argued because Hathaway had come to Oklahoma to challenge the lawsuit, this implicitly gave the state jurisdiction, except, as in this case, without Subject-matter jurisdiction, Judicial Estoppel is moot. They all know it.

Hathaway knew there was no Subject-matter jurisdiction, but couldn’t prove it until discovered additional evidence that was rock solid. Knowing she could prove it, she motioned to vacate the suit in a county that by law cannot hear or rule over the matter.

Put another way, you aren’t allowed to go to New Hampshire’s Department of Motor Vehicle and swear you live there and turn around and tell a court in Oklahoma weeks later you live in that state, if all your evidence is a storage receipt.

By all rights, it was a slam dunk. No evidence was presented to overcome the lack of Subject-matter jurisdiction as the defense relied solely on Judicial Estoppel.

That’s fraud, and neither estoppel nor anything else can be achieved by fraud, unless your friends with facing the Orwellian Miller appointed by the upstanding Presiding Judge Linda Morrissey who ignored requests to review the gross negligence claimed in this matter in her court.

By all rights, it was a slam dunk. No evidence was presented to overcome the lack of Subject-matter jurisdiction as the defense relied solely on Judicial Estoppel.

Miller denied Hathaway citing Subject-matter jurisdiction as the key to vacating the suit. Yet, The Hughes Team didn’t use that dedense! If they had, it was still a slam dunk.

Still, knowing Subject-matter jurisdiction overrides Judicial Estoppel (the defenses claim), Hathaway filed an emergency motion for reconsideration, arguing that Judicial Estoppel does not apply because subject matter was not established.  This caused Miller to augment his rulings the next day in court.

“I apparently, I left the impression and I want to correct it, that the only basis for my ruling yesterday was on the basis of Judicial Estoppel. It’s my intention to indicate that after hearing those many hours of testimony, the facts support that this court has Subject-matter jurisdiction,” the Orwellian Judge Miller stated at this hearing, “He was a resident based on the factual record presented.”

Factual Record information from Cornell University Law School Includes:

In General. In an action tried on the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court must find the facts specially and state its conclusions of law separately. The findings and conclusions may be stated on the record after the close of the evidence or may appear in an opinion or a memorandum of decision filed by the court.”

The “factual record” evidence consisted of a Tulsa storage unit receipt.  

Check out the You Tube video for highlights from the Subject-matter jurisdiction hearing.

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: