Home

Obama’s Farewell Tears Are an Insult, His Record is Soaked in Blood

1 Comment

And we stand here calling ourselves Christians, waiving the bible while this goes on. How many have to die before this god is satisfied?

SALAM ALQUDS ALAYKUM - سلام القدس عليكم

Obama’s Farewell Tears Are an Insult, His Record is Soaked in Blood By John Wight

Do not be fooled by the tears and gushing words of Obama and his supporters as he counts down to his departure from the White House. They are an insult when measured against the tears of the countless Libyans, Syrians, Afghans and others who have suffered as a result of a foreign policy that brought his administration into disrepute.

Barack Obama goes down in history as a president who more than any other in living memory entered the White House on a wave of hope and expectation, only to depart eight years and two terms later under a cloud of crushing disappointment and bitterness.
In speech after speech, America’s first black president outlined a vision of his country’s place in the world that would embrace multilateralism, place a premium on diplomacy, and embrace a foreign…

View original post 739 more words

4th OF July Celebrations Cancelled Indefinitely

2 Comments

missABy Miss American
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The first question I want to ask the president and all the members of congress is, why did you hate the way America was? The saying goes ‘love it or leave it’. Why are you still living here?   Why did you tell us you wanted to serve and represent your fellow citizens, then turn your back on us and our country? We did not plan or carry out the attacks on America on Sept. 11, 2001, but you have treated us like we did.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Traditionally, the New Years holiday is marked by the hope of a fresh start, turning over a new leaf, and high hopes of a better year ahead. We make resolutions to right the wrongs in our life and promise ourselves we’ll be a better person to all the people we know, and treat ourselves better as well. But just as we were saying a private prayer that we could indeed achieve our goals, our president, the man that the entire world placed the deepest of faith, trust, and hope in, delivered a crushing, sickening, blow to our gut. He chose to ring in the New Year with a razor sharp dagger to the American heart, by signing legislation called the National Defense Authorization Act. The NDAA. The most UNAmerican, cold blooded, and brutal piece of legislation ever to cross a president’s desk. The fact that he would choose the holiday season to betray the oath he made to America and her citizens, screamed louder than words. With his signature he revealed a shocking lack of basic decency, and displayed the true feelings he has towards the country he leads. As a real American, I have some questions I would like answered.

More

Obama’s Reckless Refugee Program Mirrors his Ebola Policy

Leave a comment

new-logo25

Contributor & Author: Richard Amerling, MD (New York City) Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine and Academic Nephrologist at the Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital in New York City. Dr. Amerling is also President of The Association Of American Physicians And Surgeons: (see bio at the bottom of this release)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Preview:  Like the response to Ebola, this is another instance where Mr. Obama is acting in flagrant disregard for the safety of Americans and the homeland. And let us not forget that his precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, betraying the sacrifice of thousands of our best and bravest, led directly to the rise of ISIS. Let us also not forget his utter disregard for border security and for federal immigration law.

We cannot wait for an election still a year away, the outcome of which is obviously uncertain. There is an overwhelming case for immediate impeachment of the enemy in the Oval Office. The safety and survival of the Republic is in jeopardy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Our feckless president’s reckless push to bring “refugees” from Syria, who are 97% Muslim and mostly men of fighting age, into the United States is analogous to his open border policy regarding potential Ebola carriers.

A little over a year ago, an Ebola-infected African immigrant was admitted to a hospital in Dallas with full blown Ebola. His stay at that hospital transformed it to the front line in a crucial battle. Two nurses who treated this man became infected. Miraculously, both survived and the disease didn’t spread further (though one of the nurses traveled in a jet with a fever, after being cleared by the CDC!).

Shortly thereafter, a young doctor, just back from treating Ebola patients in Africa, traveled around New York City with early symptoms of Ebola before being transported and isolated at Bellevue Hospital. Again, miraculously, no one else was infected by this individual.

I wrote in an op-Ed in November of last year, “There is simply no dispute that Ebola needs to be contained in West Africa. This clearly means limiting travel from this region to the United States, and requiring adequate quarantines when U.S. citizens return. Nigeria has done this and has successfully contained their outbreak. Australia became the first of the so-called developed nations to impose a travel ban…. Instead of travel restrictions, foreign health workers afflicted by Ebola may be airlifted into the U.S. for treatment. This is the opposite of containment.”

The Obama policy placed Americans at risk. Even one death from Ebola brought in from Africa would be one too many. The infected nurses were fortunate to survive, and went through an ordeal. A handful of infected people arriving in a city such as New York would place an enormous burden on the health system, and would have the potential to create a serious outbreak with many infections and deaths. This nightmare scenario did not materialize because Brussels Airlines, which has nearly complete control over flights from Ebola endemic regions, instituted an effective screening program. More

On Being Disarmed

1 Comment

new-logo25WENDELL H. WOODMAN

____________________________________________________
October 13, 2015

President Barack Obama has become the worst nightmare of the Secret Service.

Despite heartfelt pleas from residents of Roseburg, Oregon to stay away and let them bury their murdered loved ones in peace, the ignorer-in-chief tapped your treasury for millions of dollars, packed up his bodyguards and their tons of paraphernalia and crossed the country to visit with the families of the nine dead and nine injured who got mowed down by serial killer Chris Harper Mercer at Umpqua Community College on October 1.

1920541_10152099827078863_1820056404_nObama would not listen. What he faced when his never-leave-home-without-it helicopter, Marine One, arrived at the little timber town 180 miles south of Portland was an absolutely livid armed greeting committee. The crowd was not only bearing “Obama Unwelcome” and “Go Back to Kenya” signs, but holsters filled with firearms.

Organizers of the protest that drew thousands of empathizers on social media had a plea of their own: although you “have the right to carry what you wish,” they advised, better to bring a handgun than a rifle. So even at the risk of driving the Secret Service nuts, many of them did just that.

Bruce Rester, a retired truck driver wearing a holstered handgun strapped across his chest, said, “Everybody should carry a gun. An armed society is a polite society.”

If the president had sent an advance team, as a real politician would, he’d have had a scouting report on the lion’s den he was entering. But listening and thinking are two things this president doesn’t dabble in.

Before responders had finished the body count the day of the shootings, Obama was on TV making excuses for the killer. Putting on his angry mask the president recalled, “As I said just a few months ago, and I said a few months before that, and I said each time we see one of these mass shootings, our thoughts and prayers are not enough. It does not capture the heartache and grief and anger that we should feel. And it does nothing to prevent this carnage from being inflicted someplace else in America.”

Yet for all his bluster and executive orders, Obama has not been able to get rid of the Second Amendment — your right to keep and bear arms.

The Los Angeles Times reported how Don Moody, an aircraft machinist, drove five hours from Seattle with a sign that read, “The Second Amendment Protects the First.” Moody said. “We don’t want quantity of guns. We want quality of guns – in the right hands at the right time. I believe the government and the country are going in exactly the wrong direction.”

Warned of Obama’s visit on Friday, protesters of his sacrilege began arriving around sunrise. One business owner said, “It’s our God-given right to protect ourselves.” She wanted the president to understand that.

The funeral corteges were still daily events when Obama thrust himself into the maelstrom to promote national disarmament. Some protesters carried Gadsden (“Don’t Tread on Me”) flags and “Obama Go Home” signs.

Rick Breen, a retired Army veteran, said he was there to support Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin, who resented Obama’s visit. Breen said he wanted “to let Obama know he’s not welcome here.” He added, “I only wish a student had been armed. We could have stopped that murderer in his tracks.”

The cost of Obama’s visit to Roseburg should be reckoned down to the last penny by a House Select Committee on Executive Stupidity. (We can’t afford Michelle’s opulent excursions any more either.) If congress won’t impeach him, the least they can do is keep him under lock and key. They can do that by shutting off his allowance.

The Obama regime has armed itself to the teeth. As watchdog “Open the Books” founder Adam Andrzejewski recently reported, EPA’s 200 “special agents” are not only armed with $75 million a year for criminal enforcement, but millions more just spent for “guns, body armor, camouflage equipment, unmanned aircraft, amphibious assault ships, radar and night-vision gear and other military-style weaponry and surveillance.” The air and water police!

Like any ambitious tyrant, this disarmament president means to confiscate every gun so you can’t defend yourself and your family when his “community organizers” and political goons come calling with their boxcars and AK-47s to transport you to New Auschwitz, where you will be treated to a shower before you are allowed into the crematorium.

Now is the time for all good men to come to the ruination of the despotism thrust upon them — by gunfire or whatever means necessary.
++++++

The State of My Union

1 Comment

strip banner

new-logo25By Richard Amerling, M.D.

Satire

______________________________________________

“In closing, allow me to quote from my friend and mentor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright: ‘God damn America.’ Goodnight.”

___________________________________________________

Our clandestine agent in the White House has obtained a first draft of President Obama’s upcoming State of the Union address to Congress. We were told that Mr. Obama wrote this himself, though we cannot be certain. Somehow we doubt that Valerie Jarrett will permit much of this to reach 10-15-2013-5-26-05-PMthe President’s TelePrompTer.

“My Americans, my Members, my Press, my guests, welcome to the halls of my Congress. With two short years remaining in what many of you think is my last term as president, there is much yet for me to accomplish. After winning in 2008, I promised to fundamentally transform the nation. I am well on my way, but I am not yet there. FDR, who was the most successful nation-transformer before me, had four terms and a compliant Congress. Now that those of you sitting on the right side of the aisle nominally control Congress, my task is harder, and may require an additional term or two as president. The Office of Legal Counsel and the Attorney General are looking into ways we can make that happen. More

Obama’s Unlawful Amnesty Actions – Unanswered Examples

Leave a comment

strip banner

Obama’s Unlawful Amnesty Actions – It’s All A Smokescreen

Ruthie Hendrycks November 21, 2014

5aafc0a0-aeb0-11e3-93d2-12313b024af0-mediumObama NOW claims that he has the authority to override our immigration laws after repeatedly stating that he could not – not by Executive Order – but with a Presidential Memo (much like my grocery list memo on the fridge). Of course those of us paying attention realize and acknowledge the lawlessness taking place, but for those who so eagerly believe what the bias and selective mainstream media tells them – they are just uninformed of the travesty taking place – by Obama’s own admission.

Of course the Democrat’s are ‘All In’ on the lawlessness making claims such as “Gee, Obama had to … the House just would not suck it up and pass the treasonous Comprehensive Immigration Bill that WE created”. Of course, these very same Democrats are ever so silent on the fact that via Harry Reid – most of the compromising that the GOP did seek – went into a drawer in Reid’s office – never to be seen again. The Democrats only focus on this talking point because….well…. it’s all they have to try and persuade the American Citizenry that their aiding and abetting of this corruption is warranted.

One must wonder what other laws Obama feels he, his pen, phone and memo pad can simply ignore and I wonder…. if in 2016 a Republican is elected President, if the Dem’s will be so supportive of such ‘I Am King’ lawlessness? More

Lawsuit by Career ICE Attorney Exposes Obama Anti-Enforcement Campaign

1 Comment

CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES

By Jessica Vaughan, November 11, 2014

______________________________________________________

“When a number of attorneys objected to a particular example of such a criminal alien, the supervisor said, “We [ICE leadership] don’t give a s*** about that. Let it go.”

________________________________________________

Last week Patricia Vroom, an attorney with an exemplary 26-year career at ICE filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Arizona that depicts in shocking detail how a tightly-knit band of her superiors apparently bullied her and other career lawyers to force compliance with the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement suppression scheme. In addition to describing a hostile work environment spoiled by sexual harassment, threats, insults, and other deplorable behavior of these top managers, Vroom’s complaint provides alarming examples of how personnel were told to ignore the law and routinely release and dismiss charges on entire categories of criminal aliens, including certain convicted felons, drunk drivers, DACA applicants, and illegal juveniles from the border surge.

The complaint has enough juicy scenes for a night-time television drama, but what it reveals about the Obama administration’s reckless disdain for immigration enforcement is especially troubling. It is the latest in a series of lawsuits that demonstrate a disturbing pattern of abuse of authority among favored and ideologically driven senior staff in DHS agencies.Vroom describes some specific examples of how the so-called prosecutorial discretion policies have been implemented, and of the effort to destroy professional integrity in ICE’s legal division:

•Beginning in May 2009, this clique of top supervisors launched a “purge” of senior chief counsels, targeting them for “harassment, reassignment of duties to much less desirable ones, public humiliation, and brutal scapegoating” in order to place cronies in those key positions to carry out administration policy changes. Like other senior ICE attorneys, Vroom says she was targeted after the now-disgraced acting head of ICE, John Sandweg, “screamed” to her supervisor that the Phoenix office, which she ran, was “all f***ed up” for not implementing “prosecutorial discretion” to their satisfaction. More

THE MESSAGE OF THE VOTERS

2 Comments

strip bannernew-logo25 Don Jans, Author and Speaker

“My Grandchildren’s America”

___________________________________________________

“These concepts and ideas are fundamental to the essence of the United States of America. The voters said we want these fundamentals restored; we do not wish to be fundamentally transformed to a totalitarian Marxist state as Obama and the Marxist/Progressives promised and are doing. Did the Republican Party hear?

_________________________________________________

We were told by Obama that even though he was not on the ballot, his policies were. Yes, they were and the message of the election was loud and clear; America does not like the Marxist policies of the Obama regime. Even though the message was clear, the question is did the leaders of the Republican Party hear and understand the message. We already know Obama did not hear, did not understand, or chose to ignore the message.

What really was the message? It was very simple. The American voter said now that we see how this fundamental transformation that was promised looks, we do not like it. The American voter said we prefer the type of government and society our founders established. They established three basic principles that are excellent for a prosperous, free, and great country and we want these reestablished.

The three basic concepts the founders instituted had never been tried before the founders said we think this type of government and country will allow individual citizens to flourish and prosper and by being individuals they will establish a great and powerful nation. How correct the founders were. Unfortunately, others came along and said what the founders had established needed to be fundamentally transformed. They said what the founders did created a selfish and greedy people who refused to conform to the concept of subjugation to a government and community, as opposed to being a unique and non-conforming individual; the very essence of American greatness. More

The morning after election: Is there a pill for this?

4 Comments

strip bannernew-logo25Marti Oakley

____________________________________________

Mid-term elections: America loses again

We just swapped one bunch of crooks, liars and thieves for the other bunch of crooks, liars and thieves. The country just went “red” more from embarrassment than anything else. You should be embarrassed and turning beet red from being duped yet again. 2/3 of us didn’t even bother to show up to vote. What’s the point?

fascismamerica01About last night…..

I scoured the usual lineup of cable news shows to see what the response was there to the mid-terms. At one point on MSNBC where Rachael Maddow was predictably finding humor in the elections, I wondered out loud what was wrong with this woman? According to Maddow, the elections weren’t really as bad as they seemed on the surface and we should just laugh them off. They really didn’t mean anything or at least not what we thought they did. This wasn’t really a political shellacking, it was just a rub & buff…nothing more. HaHaHa….Isn’t this funny? No, it isn’t.

The remainder of the scripted reality shows we call news on MSNBC also pandered to the “its not what you think” line. Yes it was what we think. More than that, its what we know. We just traded one old man for another old man; both of them nested up for years inside the beltway and so detached from the public that neither of them try to hide their disgust for “We the People”. We just opened the door to another neo-con assault on the nation. Pardon me for not laughing.

Faux news was ready to implode as one hack after another jubilantly reported the shellacking of America via the elections and what is nothing less than the return of the neo-cons. Already they are talking about “deregulation”.

You remember deregulation don’t you? More

Mid-term elections: Pardon me while I yawn

5 Comments

strip bannernew-logo25Marti Oakley

________________________________________________

Remember when the country first elected Obama? Remember the collective sigh of relief as he spoke of returning the country to its former glory? Remember when we all thought he was going to end the neo-con overthrow of our government and country?

And remember when we all realized he had simply picked up where the Bush/Cheney Crime Syndicate left off and added some new twists of his own?

Remember how sick at your stomach you felt when you realized that Obama was Bush on steroids?

That’s kind of the same feeling too many of us out here have today. This wasn’t a mandate for Republicans although they are trying to sell it as if it was. It was a rejection of the corruption, the anti-American mind-set in the District of Criminals. And we had only two choices.

______________________________________________

34192_1thThere are few out here in the general public, regardless of supposed party affiliation, expressing any sense of celebration or excitement over last night’s election returns. We simply swapped one faction of the one-party system for the other. Most agree that nothing is going change other than the way the pre-planned agenda will be implemented.

Absent from any debates, if you could call the public displays put on by candidates on both sides a debate of any kind, was any discussion of the illegal and unwarranted spying by NSA and multiple other spy agencies operating without oversight.

No one mentioned or even discussed casually, the militarization of law enforcement against the public at large. Not one candidate mentioned the military tanks, the grenade launchers, assault rifles, SWAT gear, and other military weapons that local law enforcement is now arming themselves with for use on the very communities that employ them. Equipment that was paid for with taxpayer money or borrowed in the name of the People and produced so excessively that there was enough equipment to sell to other countries, to arm our own military and to arm local law enforcement against us. More

Obama’s Doctrine of Destruction of America as we know it, and the March to a New World Order

1 Comment

This is a good synopsis of where we are heading and how we are getting there.

A NATION BEGUILED

http://www.pakalertpress.com/

TRUTHER

We could not have a better person in office than President Obama, if you want someone to do everything he can to destroy the country that is. This President has gone out of his way to make sure not only just a few of his Socialist policies ruin us, but that his whole time in office is dedicated to the destruction of the United States as we know it.

From supplying terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, and countless other Islamic Jihadists in N. Africa, the Mid-East, Indonesia, and Europe with billions of dollars in weapons, billions in financial aid, and actual military help, to purposely busing and flying in hundreds of thousand illegal aliens per day via Homeland Security.

This President expects his agenda of anti-Americanism to continue with breaking our economy and with the EPA’s anti CO2 regulations, which are based on…

View original post 530 more words

Mission Operation American Spring

6 Comments

strip banner

On May 16th, 2014, peaceful protestors will meet in Washington DC, protesting the corruption of government and of specific individuals who have added to the corruption.  There is no doubt the American people are fed up with the law-breaking and the privileged lives in the District, they are forced to support.  OAS is demanding that Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell resign, just for starters.

The federal government and its puppets in MSM, are already priming the public for a violence filled encounter.  While OAS supporters are planning a peaceful protest, the fed’s will show up armed to the teeth complete with tanks, AK-47’s, grenade launchers, tasers, attack dogs and other weapons.  There is no way this day will pass without the feds turning it into an all out attack.  Of course, the story will be that the protesters started it.  Just like they started it at Waco, at Ruby Ridge, and at the Bundy ranch in Nevada. (sarc) And there will of course be provocateurs laced in the crowd just to make sure that the violence goes off as planned.

In fact, the only people who will show up prepared to do violence will be those working for the government.

Please go to this link to read OAS’s article and watch the short video by Col Gary G Riley  US Army RET, the founder of American Spring.

Who is Inviting Violence in D.C.? Not Operation American Spring!

U.S. SUPREME COURT GIVES GREEN LIGHT TO INDEFINITE MILITARY DETENTION OF AMERICANS WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

2 Comments

strip banner

 

U.S. SUPREME COURT GIVES GREEN LIGHT TO INDEFINITE MILITARY DETENTION OF AMERICANS WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
04-30-2014 12:47 am – Bob Unruh – World Net Daily
A decision from the U.S. Supreme Court means the federal government now has an open door to “detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker,” critics of the high court’s ruling said.

The high court by its own order this week refused to review an appellate-level decision that says the president and U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals.

Officials with William J. Olson, P.C., a firm that filed an amicus brief asking the court to step in, noted that not a single justice dissented from the denial of certiorari.

“The court ducked, having no appetite to confront both political parties in order to protect the citizens from military detention,” the legal team told WND. “The government has won, creating a tragic moment for the people – and what will someday be viewed as an embarrassment for the court.”

WND reported earlier when the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act were adopted, then later challenged in court.

The controversial provision authorizes the military, under presidential authority, to arrest, kidnap, detain without trial and hold indefinitely American citizens thought to “represent an enduring security threat to the United States.”

Journalist Chris Hedges was among the plaintiffs charging the law could be used to target journalists who report on terror-related issues.

A friend-of-the-court brief submitted in the case stated: “The central question now before this court is whether the federal judiciary will stand idly by while Congress and the president establish the legal framework for the establishment of a police state and the subjugation of the American citizenry through the threat of indefinite military arrest and detention, without the right to counsel, the right to confront one’s accusers, or the right to trial.”

The brief was submitted to the Supreme Court by attorneys with the U.S. Justice Foundation of Ramona, California; Friedman Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein of Lake Success, New York; and William J. Olson, P.C. of Vienna, Virginia.

The attorneys are Michael Connelly, Steven J. Harfenist, William J. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan and Robert J. Olson.

They were adding their voices to the chorus asking the Supreme Court to overturn the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said the plaintiffs didn’t have standing to challenge the law adopted by Congress.

The brief was on behalf of U.S. Rep. Steve Stockman, Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall, Virginia Sen. Dick Black, the U.S. Justice Foundation, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Center for Media & Democracy, Downsize DC Foundation, Downsize DC.org, Free Speech Defense & Education Fund, Free Speech Coalition, Western Journalism Center, The Lincoln Institute, Institute on the Constitution, Abraham Lincoln Foundation and Conservative Legal Defense & Education Fund.

Journalist Chris Hedges, who is suing the government over a controversial provision in the National Defense Authorization Act, is seen here addressing a crowd in New York’s Zuccotti Park.
The 2014 NDAA was fast-tracked through the U.S. Senate, with no time for discussion or amendments, while most Americans were distracted by the scandal surrounding A&E’s troubles with “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson.

Eighty-five of 100 senators voted in favor of the new version of the NDAA, which had already been quietly passed by the House of Representatives.

Hedges, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, and others filed a lawsuit in 2012 against the Obama administration to challenge the legality of an earlier version of the NDAA.

It is Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA, and its successors, that drew a lawsuit by Hedges, Daniel Ellsberg, Jennifer Bolen, Noam Chomsky, Alex O’Brien, Kai Warg All, Brigitta Jonsottir and the group U.S. Day of Rage. Many of the plaintiffs are authors or reporters who stated that the threat of indefinite detention by the U.S. military already had altered their activities.

Video mania: The instruction manual on how to restore America to what it once was: “Taking America Back” on DVD. This package also includes the “Tea Party at Sea” DVD.

“It’s clearly unconstitutional,” Hedges said of the bill. “It is a huge and egregious assault against our democracy. It overturns over 200 years of law, which has kept the military out of domestic policing.”

Hedges is a former foreign correspondent for the New York Times and was part of a team of reporters awarded a Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for the paper’s coverage of global terrorism.

The friend-of-the-court brief warned the precedent “leaves American citizens vulnerable to arrest and detention, without the protection of the Bill of Rights, under either the plaintiff’s or the government’s theory of the case.

“The judiciary must not await subsequent litigation to resolve this issue, as the nature of military detention is that American citizens then would have no adequate legal remedy,” the brief explained.

“Once again, the U.S. Supreme Court has shown itself to be an advocate for the government, no matter how illegal its action, rather than a champion of the Constitution and, by extension, the American people,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute.

“No matter what the Obama administration may say to the contrary, actions speak louder than words, and history shows that the U.S. government is not averse to locking up its own citizens for its own purposes. What the NDAA does is open the door for the government to detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker.

“According to government guidelines for identifying domestic extremists – a word used interchangeably with terrorists, that technically applies to anyone exercising their First Amendment rights in order to criticize the government,” he said.

It’s not like rounding up innocent U.S. citizens and stuffing them into prison camps hasn’t already happened.

In 1944, the government rounded up thousands of Japanese Americans and locked them up, under the approval of the high court in its Korematsu v. United States decision.

The newest authorizes the president to use “all necessary and appropriate force” to jail those “suspected” of helping terrorists.

The Obama administration had claimed in court that the NDAA does not apply to American citizens, but Rutherford attorneys said the language of the law “is so unconstitutionally broad and vague as to open the door to arrest and indefinite detentions for speech and political activity that might be critical of the government.”

The law specifically allows for the arrests of those who “associate” or “substantially support” terror groups.

“These terms, however, are not defined in the statute, and the government itself is unable to say who exactly is subject to indefinite detention based upon these terms, leaving them open to wide ranging interpretations which threaten those engaging in legitimate First Amendment activities,” Rutherford officials reported.

At the trial court level, on Sept. 12, 2012, U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest of the Southern District Court of New York ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and placed a permanent injunction on the indefinite detention provision.

Obama then appealed, and his judges on the 2nd Circuit authorized the government detention program.

Since the fight started, multiple states have passed laws banning its enforcement inside those states. Herb Titus, a constitutional expert, previously told WND Forrest’s ruling underscored “the arrogance of the current regime, in that they will not answer questions that they ought to answer to a judge because they don’t think they have to.”

The judge explained that the plaintiffs alleged paragraph 1021 is “constitutionally infirm, violating both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the 1st Amendment as well due process rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment.”

She noted the government “did not call any witnesses, submit any documentary evidence or file any declarations.”

“It must be said that it would have been a rather simple matter for the government to have stated that as to these plaintiffs and the conduct as to which they would testify, that [paragraph] 1021 did not and would not apply, if indeed it did or would not,” she wrote.

Instead, the administration only responded with, “I’m not authorized to make specific representations regarding specific people.”

“The court’s attempt to avoid having to deal with the constitutional aspects of the challenge was by providing the government with prompt notice in the form of declarations and depositions of the … conduct in which plaintiffs are involved and which they claim places them in fear of military detention,” she wrote. “To put it bluntly, to eliminate these plaintiffs’ standing simply by representing that their conduct does not fall within the scope of 1021 would have been simple. The government chose not to do so – thereby ensuring standing and requiring this court to reach the merits of the instant motion.

“Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the 1st Amendment,” she wrote.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/supreme-court-green-lights-detention-of-americans/#r3IAig6fLWioaQWy.99 – See more at: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_35369.php#sthash.uo27Loqv.dpuf

new-logo25Bob Unruh – World Net Daily

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The Obama administration had claimed in court that the NDAA does not apply to American citizens, but Rutherford attorneys said the language of the law “is so unconstitutionally broad and vague as to open the door to arrest and indefinite detentions for speech and political activity that might be critical of the government.” 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1459169_743562532338888_201663292_nA decision from the U.S. Supreme Court means the federal government now has an open door to “detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker,” critics of the high court’s ruling said.

The high court by its own order this week refused to review an appellate-level decision that says the president and U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals.

Officials with William J. Olson, P.C., a firm that filed an amicus brief asking the court to step in, noted that not a single justice dissented from the denial of certiorari.

“The court ducked, having no appetite to confront both political parties in order to protect the citizens from military detention,” the legal team told WND. “The government has won, creating a tragic moment for the people – and what will someday be viewed as an embarrassment for the court.”

WND reported earlier when the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act were adopted, then later challenged in court. More

Obamacare: Repeal (What?) and Replace (with What?)

6 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Contributor & authorJane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Government can’t fix the “health care system” any more than Obama can take out your tonsils. But it can refrain from tying up or tripping those who are trying to take care of patients.  We should start by repealing the mandates—on individuals, employers, medical facilities and professionals, and insurers. No American should be forced to buy a product he does not want or need or feels he cannot afford. No individual or company should be forced to provide services or products to government specifications. The American way is the voluntary way.

More

Obama is no ordinary weakling

5 Comments

 strip banner
PPJ note:  While I agree with most of this letter to the editor, how quickly this man forgets, along with most of the country, the embarrassing years of Bush the Dolt.  He couldn’t put two words together without making a mistake.  Two illegal wars, massive illegal immigration, science rendered a joke, education made useless and Medicare Drug coverage reform cost us 750 Billion.  The national debt went thru the roof, we were lied to at every instance.  What made us think things would change under Obama?
For once, can we just keep our damn noses out of everyone else’s business?  Our country is coming apart at the seams.  Our economy is trashed.  Jobs are virtually non existent and we have federal agencies and law enforcement arming them selves against us.  Let those in the Ukraine, Crimea and Russia handle their own affairs. We have enough trouble here to last two lifetimes.   Marti
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Letter to the editor
 
,
obama ridicule

 

 

 

Minnesota legislators backing Obama attack on the 2nd Amendment

1 Comment

strip banner

new-logo25Editors note:  Obama has just signed on to the U.N.s Global Small Arms Treaty claiming he will implement it by executive order.  This is NOT a valid treaty and has NOT been ratified by the Senate and therefore has no force of power.  This is why there is a concerted effort within the states to deconstruct the 2nd Amendment, one state at a time.  Unfortunately, several Democrats and Republicans in the Minnesota legislature are on board with the Obama plan. 

_____________________________________________________________________

Header-3

Campaign for Liberty

I warned about the gun-grabbers’ plans to take guns away without a trial.

Now they are dangerously close to achieving their goal and I need you to act today to stop them.

Senate File 2639 (SF 2639) and House File 3238 (HF 3238) are bills “prohibiting persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing weapons”. Even those not convicted of any crime must give up their guns to a third party.

These orders are given out routinely with no evidence required. The “feelings” of the accuser would result in innocent people running the risk of becoming a felon before they are tried for a crime.

In an effort to fool liberty and pro-gun activists, the gun-grabbers modified HF 3238 with a fig leaf “compromise.”

However, even with the “compromise” language, the anti-gun HF 3238 still strips people of their Second Amendment rights without a trial.

This is a dangerous precedent, which will set the stage for further attacks on the rights of all gun owners.

Call your State Senator and State House Member today.
Tell him or her to reject the fig-leaf “compromise” and vote NO on SF 2639 and HF 3238. Find your legislators by CLICKING HERE.

Votes on SF 2638 and HF 3238 may happen at any time now.

Don’t get me wrong – abusers should be prosecuted, and women and children should be protected from violence.

But SF 2639 and HF 3238 are disguises for attacking your constitutional right to due process and your right to keep and bear arms.

If enacted, these bills would require all guilty-until-proven-innocent parties to hand over their guns to someone else while they try to prove their innocence.

The gun-grabbers know they cannot be upfront about their intentions to destroy the Second Amendment because then their plans would fail.

That’s why they have been trying to chip away at our gun rights piece-by-piece.

That is why we must stand up now and tell the politicians in St. Paul NO to SF 2639 and to reject the fig-leaf “compromise” in HF 3238.

Please, call your state Senator and Representative now. Tell him or her to vote NO on SF 2639 and HF 3238 at each and every opportunity.

In Liberty,

Bill Paulsen
State Coordinator
Minnesota Campaign for Liberty

P.S. The anti-gun forces are determined to use the anti-gun majorities in the legislature to attack every Minnesotan’s Second Amendment rights by passing SF 2639 and HF 3238.

Call your state Senator and Representative and tell him or her to oppose SF 2639 and reject the fig-leaf “compromise” HF 3238 now. You can find your legislators by CLICKING HERE.

HISTORICAL AND CURRENT TACTICS USED WHEN USURPING POWER

2 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Don Jans, Author and Acclaimed Speaker

www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com

___________________________________________________________

“This is documented history.  This is how a totalitarian state comes into being.  The aspiring dictator must silence the opposition.  At present, the IRS has been the chosen vehicle to silence those who oppose the Marxist/Progressive regime headed by Obama.  The aspiring dictator must assume power whether legal or not.  Obama has taken it upon himself to write law, which is not within the powers of the office he holds.” More

OBAMA REAFFIRMS INTENT TO TRANSFORM US INTO MARXIST SOCIETY

6 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25 Don Jans

My Grand Children’s America Blog 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Monday, November 30, 2013, Obama gave a talk about what he called the growing inequality and lack of opportunity in America.   He said this would be his focus the rest or his term.  This is how he phrased it.

“…. and that is a dangerous and growing inequality and lack of upward mobility that has jeopardized middle-class America’s basic bargain — that if you work hard, you have a chance to get ahead.  I believe this is the defining challenge of our time:  Making sure our economy works for every working American.  It’s why I ran for President.  It was at the center of last year’s campaign.  It drives everything I do in this office.  And I know I’ve raised this issue before, and some will ask why I raise the issue again right now.  I do it because the outcomes of the debates we’re having right now — whether it’s health care, or the budget, or reforming our housing and financial systems — all these things will have real, practical implications for every American.  And I am convinced that the decisions we make on these issues over the next few years will determine whether or not our children will grow up in an America where opportunity is real.” More

The United Nations Small Arms Treaty nullifies the Second Amendment:

6 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25

Contributed J.S. Rugg

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SO – WHO WOULD VOTE FOR SUCH A TREATY?

THE ANSWER:  MR. OBAMA
HILLARY CLINTON
AND THESE 46 SENATORS:

> Baldwin (D-WI)
> Baucus (D-MT)
> Bennett (D-CO)
> Blumenthal (D-CT)
> Boxer (D-CA)
> Brown (D-OH)
> Cantwell (D-WA)
> Cardin (D-MD)
> Carper (D-DE)
> Casey (D-PA)
> Coons (D-DE)
> Cowan (D-MA)
> Durbin (D-IL)
> Feinstein (D-CA) Biggst Scumbag
> Franken (D-MN)
> Gillibrand (D-NY)
> Harkin (D-IA)
> Hirono (D-HI)
> Johnson (D-SD)
> Kaine (D-VA)
> King (I-ME)
> Klobuchar (D-MN)
> Landrieu (D-LA)
> Leahy (D-VT)
> Levin (D-MI)
> McCaskill (D-MO)
> *Menendez (D-NJ)
> Merkley (D-OR)
> Mikulski (D-MD)
> Murphy (D-CT)
> Murray (D-WA)
> Nelson (D-FL) Real Scumbag
> Reed (D-RI)
> Reid (D-NV)
> Rockefeller (D-WV)
> Sanders (I-VT)
> Schatz (D-HI)
> Schumer (D-NY)
> Shaheen (D-NH)
> Stabenow (D-MI)
> Udall (D-CO)
> Udall (D-NM)
> Warner (D-VA)
> Warren (D-MA)
> Whitehouse (D-RI)
> Wyden (D-OR)

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD – THESE PEOPLE MUST BE REPLACED IF AMERICA IS TO SURVIVE

Help Kickstart World War III!

3 Comments

strip banner

If you can watch this without laughing, there is no help for you!

The Second City Network

TREASON IN BENGHAZI – MY THEORY

15 Comments

John Wallace
__________________________________________________________________________
Back In August of 2012, there were reports in the national media that President Mohamed Morsi, the new President of Egypt had requested that the Obama administration release the Blind Sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman, the convicted mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center Terrorist attack, as a sign of good faith. The story persisted for a couple of weeks but gradually faded as the national media lost interest and the Obama administration denied that they were talking to anyone about releasing him.
I have a theory that there was some truth to the story, but when it was somehow leaked out to the public, the Obama administration circled the wagons and with the usual cooperation of the main stream media, the story was killed and no one paid any attention to it anymore.
I believe there is a strong possibility that there is a connection between the rumors about releasing the Blind Sheik and the Terrorist Attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. The information comes from confidential sources, congressional hearings and the stories in the press. Defenders of the President and his administration, including his allies in the national media (sometimes called the 5th column) will lash out and call what I am detailing here, just another “conspiracy theory.”
But consider this. The President of the United States, for over three months, has repeatedly lied about what happened at Benghazi, still refuses to tell the truth and avoids answering any questions about what he and his national security advisors did while watching the whole terrorist incident on closed circuit TV .
Because of this lack for truthfulness on the part of the president and his administration, my theory is a lot more plausible than the President’s lies. More

The GOP: A post election soap opera

10 Comments

 Marti Oakley                    (c) copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________________________

The Ways of our Lives…….

The election is over and no one is surprised or even excited about the outcome.  We already knew Obama was the pre-selected winner regardless of how anyone supposedly voted.  It is ironic that Republican voters are now feeling the anger that Democratic voters felt when they watched the 2000 and 2004 elections rigged for Bush the Dolt.  Apparently, vote fraud is ok if you are on the right, but quite hard to endure when it comes from the left. No matter, walking into the voting booth was an exercise in futility…..we already knew Obama would get four more years.  That was the plan and it was the plan all along and nothing, not even your votes, was going to change that. The scripted stage shows we call debates revealed nothing of any real interest to the public.  The absolute silence from Romney on subjects such as:

The TSA molestation of travelers,

The coming UN Small Arms Treaty meant to by-pass the 2nd Amendment,

The LOST treaty which will cede all of our rights on the open seas,

The growing police state here in the US,

The unconstitutional NDAA,

Ending the Czars offices which were unlawfully created, and,

Not one hint of the mountain of executive orders, written not as president of the United States, but issued as Chief Executive of the corporation operating as “The USA, a.k.a. The United States of America”.

Ultimately, this is what both men were fighting over…….who would be the new Chief Executive of the Corporate United States. More

Vote all you want: The flight plan doesn’t change

76 Comments

  Marti Oakley  Copyright 2012 All rights Reserved

________________________________________________________________

Vote all you want, the flight plan does not change no matter who wins.  We got us a big election coming up and of course the country is dividing itself right down the middle at least in some areas. For most of us out here this coming election means nothing.  The usual arguments over whether we are flying headlong into socialism or, if we are in fact in the throws of fascism seem to have lost their appeal.  Most have realized that whether socialism or fascism the end result is the same; a ruling class and the rest of us servants.  It just depends on which sales pitch appeals to you. For most of us, we have had it with the snake oil politicians and their ever changing sales pitch’s.

Fascism, the overtaking of government by corporations, is hidden behind euphoric,  glorious terms;  Free markets, free trade, globalism and the world economy.  Most who subscribe to this pitch appear to be fearful of being cut out of the action, maybe not getting a piece of the global pie or at least a piece as big as they thought they should get.  Socialism, the plan for the common people, will see many fall never to rise again.

In 2010, even many hard-core Republicans were relieved to see the end of the Bush/Cheney neo-cons and the unending assaults on freedom and our rights.  Eight years of what was, in my opinion, the most treacherous, murderous, pathologically evil cabal that had seized control of our country, was finally over.  What we were to find out was that it would only be continued under the new president, and taken so much further.

The election of Obama gave the country its first sense of hope after eight years of massive walls of lies, deceit, manipulation and some of the most corrupt individuals to ever find their way into our government.  We replaced the neo-cons with Obama/Biden.  We should have listened more closely to that victory speech, but we didn’t.  We were too relieved, too hopeful and far too enthralled with this new president and the promises made; promises we thought meant a return to liberty, to integrity and honor.  We should have listened more closely and not allowed our emotions to cloud our critical thinking.

Fundamentally changing

Obama asked in his acceptance speech if we were ready to join him in fundamentally changing our country.  What did we think he meant?  Did any one of us think to ask….fundamentally change it how? More

Republicans: And now you object??

7 Comments

 Marti Oakley

_______________________________________________________________________

Who is afraid of ……..

The rumors, innuendo’s and probably a fair amount of good information is circulating about Obama.  Republicans are working furiously to make him into some kind of boogey man.  Be afraid! Be very afraid!  If Obama gets re-elected you never know what will happen.

Yes, actually we do.  The same thing that will happen if Romney is elected. 

Either one will:

  • continue to deconstruct the United States,
  • sign away our sovereignty with free trade agreements
  • sell more of our infrastructure off to foreign interests
  • lie us into more wars
  • continue the building of the police state
  • condone the unwarranted spying on and surveillance of Americans
  • continue to push Agenda 21 to end property rights
  • use the phoney “global warming” crap to increase taxes
  • take all water rights except those granted to corporations More

No debate in the presidential debates

19 Comments

 Marti Oakley

_______________________________________________________________________

About those scripted presidential debates

Is there anyone out there who is actually anticipating the presidential debates? I am at a loss to find more than a handful of people who even express any interest in the upcoming election. In fact, I ran an in house poll asking people to answer this question, which at this point, 315 people have responded to.

Will you vote in the presidential election?

* Yes, I always vote! 10.48 % (33 votes)

* No, I can’t support any of these candidates. 33.33% (105 votes)

* Yes, I always vote to support my party. 2.54% (8 votes)

* No, I won’t support either of these partys. 37.48 % (118 votes)

* What’s the point? An illegal will probably vote using my identity. 10.16% (32 votes)

* Other 6.03% (19 votes)

I believe my poll is most likely more reflective of the common mind-set. I didn’t ask skewed questions. I didn’t ask only those who are registered in my party (because I don’t have a party affiliation). I just asked anyone who took the time to answer the poll the simple question posed above.

About those debates……. More

Let’s just call it “Obomney” and move on

14 Comments

Marti Oakley

_____________________________________________________

Vote for “Obomney”!

Try as they might, MSM just can’t get the fire stoked under the 2012 election.  Few, if any at all, are remotely concerned with what will simply be the crowning of yet another internationalist/globalist/world economy talking head.  I do believe the American public is fed up with phony partisanship, fictional political divides and who can tell the biggest lies and still get re-elected or, elected for the first time.  Obama? Romney?

Let’s just call it “Obomney” and move on. More

Obama & Panetta v The US Constitution

5 Comments

Marti Oakley     © Copyright 2012     All Rights Reserved  **See Reservations below.

_______________________________________________________________________

Will the real terrorists please stand up?

Barack Obama, Chief Executive of the corporation operating as “The United States”, has joined forces with Leon Panetta, head of the Department of Defense in attempting to have the May 15th, 2012 ruling of Judge Katherine B Forest overturned. Judge Forest issued a 69 page ruling regarding the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) . This was the legislative attack on several constitutional rights and protections passed by Democrats and Republicans alike in 2011. On December 31, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the 2012 act into law. The May 15 ruling temporarily blocks the NDAA, and section 1021 in particular.

In June the Obama Administration contacted Judge Forest and demanded that she reverse her ruling of May 15. The Judge refused. The government’s argument was that the plaintiff’s who were afraid of being disappeared into the abyss of the police state, had no standing because the government had not yet kidnaped them and stashed them away never to be heard from again. Which of course would have solved any problems associated with future lawsuits as once they were disappeared there is no way they would ever see the light of day in a court room to establish their “standing”.

Section 1021 of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. by military or Homeland Terrorism agents on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S.

It appears obvious to me that those engaged in hostilities against the US reside inside the District of Criminals. It seems that no one is more hostile to, or more engaged in hostile activities against the nation than the very agencies and government agents that the NDAA empowers.

How could an unconstitutional law such as this, have been passed unless those voting for it were actively and openly hostile towards the country and people who would be affected by it? That would be the House and Senate and the target would be us, the citizens.

Who are the real terrorists here? More

OUTRAGEOUS: DISREGARDING THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED IN A OBAMA ELECTION ELIGIBILITY HEARING IN GEORGIA

33 Comments

John W. Wallace/ PPJ Contributor

THE JUDGE RULES THAT OBAMA CAN STILL BE ON THE BALLOT

Another case of Judicial Tyranny in America. Disregarding all of the evidence that President Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen and is not eligible to be a candidate for President of the United States, a George judge for the State Office of Administrative Hearings, ruled that Barack Obama ’s name will remain on the Georgia primary ballot anyway.

Who got to him? Who threatened this judge or paid him off?

Judge Michael Malihi dismissed the following:

1. the charge that Barack Obama has a computer-generated fraudelent Hawaiian birth certificate,

2. possesses a fraudulent Social Security number and other invalid U.S. identification papers and

3. the charge that Mr. Obama is ineligible to be a candidate because his father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.

Judge Malihi’s decision will now go to Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who will make the final determination. Last month, at a hearing boycotted by Obama’s lawyer, Malihi considered complaints brought by citizens of Georgia.

With regard to the challenge that Obama does not have legitimate birth and identification papers, Malihi said he found the evidence “unsatisfactory” and “insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations” even though a number of the witnesses who testified about the alleged fraud in birth records, forged documents and document manipulation. He said that “none … provided persuasive testimony” More

The fix is in: Republicans make sure Obama serves second term

31 Comments

John Boering /PPJ contributor  November 19, 2011

________________________________________

I have concluded that we may as well dispense with the coming media circus surrounding the 2012 presidential election.  Think of it: no phony “debates”, no stage shows, no mud slinging ads, no having to hear the same lame lies and statements as one candidate after another tries to convince us that he/she will reverse the terrible destructive course the US  is on.  We don’t need to subject ourselves to any of it; the fix is in and Obama wins hands down, no competition……or at least none that the Republican party will acknowledge.  Why upset the status quo?

How do I know this?

The Republican party could easily sweep the elections and retake the White House simply by running Ron Paul (R) TX.  Poll after poll shows Paul garnering  25% with GOP voters and as much as 70% or more with the public  from BOTH sides of the political spectrum. 

During the GOP debate, CBS twice removed a candidate poll because the support for Ron Paul showed that he was far and away the leading choice for Republican voters and that was not supposed to happen!

So why wouldn’t the Republican party run what is clearly a winning candidate?  Hmmmmm.  Because Ron Paul would put an end to much of the power Republicans and Democrats enjoy as a result of their own self-pandering, power grabbing and unconstitutional activity. 

 Instead they are offering the sorriest collection of non-starters most likely ever assembled for a presidential race and are actively blacking out and refusing to acknowledge the popularity of Paul with the voters and what would be a sure-fire land-slide election. More

The hunting of America….another treasonous Act

23 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved
__________________________________________

Who could imagine this day would come?  Obviously, the Pentagon, the Bush Administration not only imagined it, but put it in motion.  Our own government in collusion with the military are openly moving against the people of the United States.  It is more than apparent we ARE the ENEMY so feared by those in power.  They weren’t  hunting BinLaden, they aren’t looking for terrorists…….they are preparing to hunt us. 

The continual threats of an attack perpetrated by some vague enemy they either cannot identify or will not indentify are overshadowed by the presence of our own military on our streets fully engaged in preparation for attacking us.  If you think for one moment they wouldn’t…….just look at your local police and sheriff’s departments..fully militarized and more than willing to assault people in their own communities. 

But don’t forget:  In 2008, General Renault of the Air Force signed that agreement of treason with the Canadians called the Civil Assistance Plan.  Plan B to be used just in case our soldiers decide love of country and patriotism does not include launching attacks on US civilians.  In this case, the Canadians will send their troops to do the job.  And we will return the favor for them, sending our troops against Canadians. 

The suicide rate in our military is at an all time high as troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are suffering post traumatic stress and suffering from horrendous depression as a result of what they saw and were required to do in the name of Bush’s (and now Obama’s) wars on humanity.  I have to wonder what kind of mental suffering will occur if in the future these young men and women have to deal with the suffering they caused here in their own country if this preparation for assault inside the US by the United States military takes place.

Border Perimeter and Security Act between US and Canada  More

Obama can’t pass E-verify–mismatched SS number

22 Comments

Press Release:   Indianapreppers

September 24th, 2011

To: Barack H. Obama

1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington, DC 20500

RE: Social Security Administration Notice of Mismatch Letter 

Dear. Mr. Obama,

Currently, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986) require employers, by law, to establish that their employees are eligible to work in the United States.  The Form I-9 was developed for verifying that persons are eligible to work in the United States.  

Employers are required by law to have employees hired after November 6, 1986 fill out Section 1 of the Form I-9 when they start to work.  Section 1 of Form I-9 asks for your name, birth date, address and social security number (SSN). It also asks you to attest if you are; A citizen of the United States, A non- citizen national of the United States, A lawful permanent resident (Alien#) or An alien authorized to work.

As one of your employers I used due diligence attempting to find a copy of your I-9 on the White House Website and other public records websites and could not.  I am including an I-9 Form for you to fill out so I can keep it on file as required by law.

On the White House website I did find your name, date of birth and your address.  I found the SSN you are using on a copy of your Selective Service Registration.  I have heard you say many times that you are a citizen of the United States.

I registered with the government run E-Verify System and on August 17th, 2011,  I entered your name, birthdate, address, SSN and citizen status in to E-Verify.  The data was correctly entered. I was allowed to run a check on your eligibility to work in the United States.

I received back a “Notice of Mismatch with Social Security Administration Records: SSA record does not verify, other reason.”

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) have stated that an employer’s failure to adequately follow-up on a Notice of Mismatch could constitute evidence of or contribute to an employer’s constructive knowledge of an employee’s unauthorized status.

When an employer receives a Notice of Mismatch concerning one of their employees the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices states that the employer:

1.     Must inform the employee of the no-match notice. Consider yourself informed by means of this letter.

2.     Must ask the employee to confirm his/her name and SSN. Please confirm or correct the name and SSN I entered in to the E-Verify System:   Barack H Obama    042-68-4425.  

3.     Please correct or confirm the Citizenship Status I entered with your name, birth date and SSN:  A citizen of the United States. 

Sincerely, 

Linda Jordan

New World Order and Obama’s “Blessing” on Taliban HQ

6 Comments

Oh my – somebody decided to rant on Friday: Karl Denninger of Market-Ticker:

There is persistent chatter about a Greek default over the weekend, which Greece denied, but the denier refused to be named.  If it’s not true, then put your damned name on the statement or be considered what you are – liars.  Greece failed to place their short-term bill rollover.  That’s a declaration by the market that even for short-term paper the market has utterly lost confidence in Greece and the Euro.

Germany’s DAX market relative to the United States just hit a five year low today.
We are doing the same thing right here in the United States with Obama’s demands for “more stimulus” with no way to pay for it, games being run by banks suppressing price discovery and hiding losses on mortgages engendered by nine trillion in residential property value loss, the asset-stripping that was performed on the citizens of Jefferson County Alabama and more.  Not one damn thing has been done to fix the underlying problems and nobody has gone to jail for these acts.

You cannot solve a debt crisis with more debt any more than you can fix a drunk with a case of whiskey.  Yet that is exactly what we’ve tried to do both in the United States and internationally.  The end point of that process here is exactly the same as it is there.  You’re getting a preview America, and if you think that a 20% sell-off in the stock market is what we get when it happens here, you’re wrong.  Try a 90% loss on for size followed by the utter failure of every pension fund and insurance company that has sold annuities – including yours.
EVERY ONE OF THE POLITICIANS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE – ALL OF THEM WITHOUT EXCEPTION – HAVE LIED, CHEATED AND STOLE FROM YOU TO PROTECT A GANG THAT HAS REPEATEDLY ABUSED LEVERAGE TO ROB YOU BLIND.  NOW THE PONZI SCHEME IS COLLAPSING AS WE ARE OUT OF SUCKERS – GLOBALLY – WITH WHICH TO PERPETUATE IT.

Watch for French Banks to finish up their Heebie Jeebies today – apparently it is their turn to take the blame (must be on a revolving program in the EU to “take one for the Gipper”: European markets dragged down by French banks

European markets plunged Monday amid continuing concerns that Greece might default on its loans and Moody’s Investors Service might downgrade a number of French banks.

Of course the little “nuclear accident” that the MSM is screaming about this morning in Southern France ought to distract from the fact that while NATO is still knocking off people who work for the Taliban over in the “bad” Muslim countries, they are happily applying their blessing to Qatar’s new Taliban Headquarters.

Today it was reported that Barack Obama gave the Taliban his blessing to open their first political offices in Qatar.

The Gulf state is believed to have agreed to let the group have a base after Washington decided that it should be located away from the influence of Pakistan.

The good news? This is planned before Christmas! Oh wonderful – I am most sure that the Muslim Taliban cannot wait to open what is under their Christmas Tree wrapped in a big blood-red bow painted by the loss of NATO and United States Soldiers over the last decade. Wonder what “The One” will put in their Stockings? Don’t spoil the surprise, maybe more heat seeking missiles?

I have an idea. Let’s set up a Headquarters for the entire Planetary Political Party in a place that can be “away from the influence” of the insane New World Order that is being perpetuated. We’ll just sent them all up on the supply rockets that are headed on up to the International Space Station.  Oh. That wouldn’t work out so well now would it with the only access to the ISS blowing up twice recently.

I was inspired this morning by this image.

Better to die on your feet than live forever on your knees

How ironic.

As long as Socialism is being slowly implemented in this Nation through the current Presidential Actions, my point of inspiration comes from the story of Dolores Ibarruri and the Communist Party Uprising in Spain.

Now where did we put those unused Space Shuttles? I hear they can hold at least 535 well packed Politicians in the Cargo Hold.

 

Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

John Wallace: American Politics radio show

Leave a comment

NEXT SHOW: WEDNESDAY– AUGUST 31 st at 8:00pm More

A Bully Debt Limit Increase : Need vs Want

25 Comments

Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

This is a long-term issue in which many Administrations bear the weight upon their shoulders of “borrowing gone out of control” in conjunction with “spending with no accountability”.

Now consider comparing the above explanation with this “reasoned” Chicago style approach:

Obama says he cannot guarantee Social Security checks will go out on August 3 More

The Libyan War Sets Deadly Precedents

15 Comments

John Boering (c)copyright 2011 All rights Reserved

________________________________________________

“These abominable acts set the stage for more criminal activity and tyranny: UN authorized wars for oil and resources, expansion of presidential power caused by the impotency of Congress, the death of the Constitution, runaway “defense” spending that bankrupts taxpayers, and the outright theft of nations’ assets for use against them.”

________________________________________________

Obama’s military action (war) against Libya sets dangerous precedent with each passing day that increases tyranny in America and abroad.

•  A United Nations resolution was the justification for US military action in Libya. More

Illinois Leads The Way in Peaceful Binding Contracts – No – Seriously

1 Comment

Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

There is an interesting little Bill in (of all places) Illinois that proposes big changes to the way Construction is bid on and completed in the State.

HB 2987 is full of beautiful prose, heart stirring words and a load of crap everything good that is right with the world.  Minorities and Women will be “equal” from the burden of not being represented in the construction industry and PLA’s will abound throughout whilst bringing Illinois in line with Presidential Executive Order 13502.

If readers are not familiar with PEO 13502, be assured it must be great. After all it revokes Shrub2’s PEO which opened the door for competitive bidding on pretty much every Construction project that receives in any way federal funding (Tax Dollars). Of course not every American believes this is a good idea.

Governor Quinn apparently thought our Dear Leader was right on track because he issued Executive Order 3 (2010)

What exactly does Illinois EO3 say?

WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has a compelling interest in awarding public works contracts so as to ensure the highest standards of quality and efficiency at the lowest responsible cost; and More

South Korean Trade Agreement: Another economy killing trade agreement in the Works

5 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved  

__________________________________________

“We are being set up, as a nation. A food crisis is about to hit this country as our strategic grain reserve sits empty, as no commodities surpluses have been stockpiled and as absolutely every agricultural product is targeted for exporting to the highest bidder.  It has taken many years, through various administrations and successive congresses to manipulate us into this position.  It doesn’t take much to see that we will be most likely starved into accepting the World Government. ” More

American politics with John Wallace: blogtalk

Leave a comment

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW
 NEXT SHOW – (THIS FRIDAY) Oct 29th at 5:00PM  EST

TOPIC:  ELECTION 2010 – What’s Going to Happen on November 2nd? More

Health Care Hikes Continue As The Economy Apparently Improves.

1 Comment

Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

As we discussed in August and later in September, the enormity of the Health Care debacle is finally being realized by the Insurance Companies. Perhaps they did have some notion of the rising prices to come although with the transparency of all Government at this point, the Taxpayer will never know.

Today it is reported in the New York Times that the Obama Administration will allow insurers to raise fees for sick children (I’m sure it is still the prior administrations fault):

The Obama administration, aiming to encourage health insurance companies to offer child-only policies, said Wednesday that they could charge higher premiums for coverage of children with serious medical problems, if state law allowed it.

and then: More

“You are either with us, or you work for the government”: Is this the new definition of an American citizen?

14 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

_____

Who, by virtue of all these listed activities and many more, was deemed a threat to the government?  Read the bills.  The only thing missing in them is your specific name.  All of this brought to you by the Republicans during the Bush Administrations. 

_____________________________

So now Bush and the neo-cons are blameless? And you want the Republicans back? 

For all of you out there beating the drum for Republican’s to take control of both houses of Congress, I have to ask:  Were you in a coma from 2000 to 2008? 

While I surely do not support the current administration and its globalist agenda, and, while I believe Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid represent a clear and present danger to the country at large, I find them no more repugnant than say, Karl Rove or Tom Delay; their personalities and intentions no less malignant than those of the neo-cons who set the overthrow of the sovereign United States into motion.  I find them equally as frightening in their contempt for us, as I did Dick Cheney and his crew of fascist driven cohorts.  And now you want to put the masterminds of this coup’ back in control?  What is it you think will change?  What is it that you think these psychopaths and sociopaths are going to do to better the current crisis in our government?  

How quickly and conveniently so many of you have forgotten that it was the Republicans, lead by the neo-con faction, who gave us the unconstitutional: 

  • Patriot Acts;
  • John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007; a bill which gave the president the unlawful authority to:
  • declare anyone of us a domestic terrorist for resisting the growing tyranny of our own government; More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: