Home

Self-Censorship: Where The Real Damage Is Being Done

1 Comment

“After my August Twitter suspension a #Resistance account publicly doxxed me, posting my home address, phone number and other information. I didn’t make a public ordeal out of it at the time because I obviously didn’t want to draw attention to it, but I did report it because I wanted it deleted. I was not expecting Twitter Support to reject my report, especially after they had me jump through a bunch of hoops to prove that I did in fact live where the doxxer was saying I lived, but they did.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

(CJ Opinion) — I was going to write another article today about a different topic, but I backed down because I didn’t think I could deliver the kind of fiery, forceful, unmitigated argument it would need to be without risking getting banned from social media and blogging platforms.

The article I was planning on writing, which you’ll just have to imagine now, would have been titled “ ‘Assange Can Leave Whenever He Wants!’ No, Idiot, He Can’t.” The feature image was going to be a screen shot of a blue-checkmarked empire loyalist named Greg Olear tweeting the infuriatingly dopey argument that Assange is free to just waltz out the embassy doors whenever he wants, so therefore he isn’t actually being imprisoned by an Orwellian power establishment for publishing authentic documents about powerful people. Never mind the fact that you can say exactly the same thing about literally anyone under political asylum; they are all free to leave the political asylum they’ve been granted at any time, and pointing this out is just describing the thing that political asylum is. Never mind the fact that a UN panel ruled that Assange is being arbitrarily detained by the threat of imprisonment. Never mind that the same US government which tortured Chelsea Manning is currently openly pursuing Assange’s arrest because of his publications, making the assertion that he’s “free to leave” the same as saying he’s “free” to jump off a cliff. People don’t want to believe that their government imprisons journalists, so whenever Assange is in the news you see this argument making the rounds.

I’ve been self-censoring more and more lately, especially since the latest round of coordinated cross-platform silencing of multiple alternative media outlets the other day. Back in August I had my Twitter account temporarily deleted when I said the world will be better off without John McCain and a bunch of #Resistance accounts mass reported me; Twitter cited “abusive behavior” as its justification. The only reason my account was restored was because there was a large objection from many high-profile journalists and activists who understand the dangers of internet censorship, and I’m not willing to gamble that I’d get that lucky should something similar happen again. Being able to disrupt establishment narratives on a high-traffic website like Twitter outweighs the benefits of speaking in an unmitigated way.

More

Please call Congress and tell your lawmakers to overturn the FCC and restore net neutrality:

2 Comments

 

Thank you for supporting net neutrality –

Please call Congress and tell your lawmakers to overturn the FCC and restore net neutrality:

Call: 858-264-0403

We’ll connect you to your lawmakers. You can use this script — just introduce yourself, be polite, and say:

“I support Title Two net neutrality and I urge you to sign the discharge petition and vote for the Congressional Review Act ‘resolution of disapproval’ to restore net neutrality.”

Thank you!
-The StopTheFCC Coalition

Internet Sales Tax Bill

2 Comments

strip bannerInternet Sales Tax Bill

Invoice# 7463
Dear Internet User,

The Federal Government has calculated the sales tax owed on your internet purchases for 2013. More

Urgent! Congress moving to kill net neutrality

Leave a comment

 Fight For The Future

The Internet rose up and we are closer than ever to winning net neutrality, but now Congress is trying to kill it.

Click here to call congress and the FCC!

Today, the House and Senate are holding hearings to hijack the FCC’s debate on whether to save net neutrality or let ISPs create Internet slow lanes. The Chairmen of the committees, who receive large contributions from the cable industry, want to pass legislation (called the Thune/Upton proposal) to derail the FCC’s net neutrality efforts. This is happening today, tell them to stop now.

The House and Senate hearings on the Congressional plan to destroy net neutrality will be held at 10AM EST and 2:30PM EST respectively. Stay tuned on this page to watch the livestreams below.

Google Seeks to Weaken Search Engine Ranking of “Content Farming” Websites

Leave a comment

Sunday, January 23, 2011

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Alternative news sites beware, Google is changing their algorithm to reduce your status to a spammer in an attempt to control the flow of information on the Internet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Eric Blair 
Activist Post

Google has announced that it is fixing flaws in its algorithm that allows search results to be spammed, while also planning to weaken the search-ability of websites referred to as “content farms.”  Matt Cutts, head of Google’s anti-spam team, writes:

As “pure webspam” has decreased over time, attention has shifted instead to “content farms,” which are sites with shallow or low-quality content. In 2010, we launched two major algorithmic changes focused on low-quality sites. Nonetheless, we hear the feedback from the web loud and clear: people are asking for even stronger action on content farms and sites that consist primarily of spammy or low-quality content. (my emphasis)

The only clear reference from Google about problems occurring from “content farms” in regards to spamming search results is from China: “Last year Google faced a rash of webspam on Chinese domains in our index. Some spammers were purchasing large amounts of cheap .cn domains and stuffing them with misspellings and porn phrases.”  They claim this scheme led to “irrelevant” search results.

Yet, their goal seems to be to weaken what has been referred to as “news aggregating” websites as “one change that primarily affects sites that copy others’ content and sites with low levels of original content.” This clearly describes many sites that present alternative news. However, plenty of alternative news sites and blogs have original material which they freely share, in part or in full, purely to support one another in disseminating the truth. This is of key importance to spread information in the absence of government or foundation funding, as enjoyed by much of the mainstream media. It is also a counter to censorship, so that a free market of ideas can flourish where people can investigate facts for themselves, rather than have opinions dictated from a limited number of sources. Continue Reading

FCC passed new rules — written by corporations — that will end Net Neutrality

8 Comments

BREAKING: Minutes ago, the FCC passed new rules — written by corporations — that will end Net Neutrality.
For the first time in history, the U.S. government approved corporate censorship of the Internet, putting the future of online free speech at risk. Unbelievably, the person leading the charge was Obama appointee Julius Genachowski.
This violates President Obama’s campaign promise to protect Net Neutrality, but some media are reporting the corporate spin that this is a “Net Neutrality compromise.” It’s not — there’s no such thing as half a First Amendment. We need to set the record straight.
If you’re on Facebook, click here to spread the word.
By sharing, you can help us spread the top 3 reasons the rules passed today are a giveaway to big corporations and break Obama’s promise:
  1. They enshrine different rules for wired and wireless Internet — allowing big corporations to censor on your mobile phone
  2. They allow corporations to set up tollbooths online, stifling new innovators like the next YouTube who can’t pay the fees the old, crusty corporations can pay
  3. For the first time, they embrace a “public Internet” for regular people vs. a “private Internet” with all the new innovations for corporations who pay more — ending the Internet as we know it
A more detailed explanation is here. Please pass this email to your friends so they know not to believe the corporate spin.
Thanks for being a bold progressive,
Jason Rosenbaum, Adam Green, Stephanie Taylor, and the PCCC team

Death of Free Internet is Imminent: Canada Will Be Test Case

Leave a comment

Live Link: The National Expositor

Kevin Parkinson on 22 July, 2008 11:10:21

image

Reality Check – In the last 15 years or so, as a society we have had access to more information than ever before in modern history because of the Internet. There are approximately 1 billion Internet users in the world and any one of these users can theoretically communicate in real time with any other on the planet.

The Internet has been the greatest technological achievement of the 20th century by far, and has been recognized as such by the global community. The free transfer of information, uncensored, unlimited and untainted, still seems to be a dream when you think about it. Whatever field that is mentioned- education, commerce, government, news, entertainment, politics and countless other areas- have been radically affected by the introduction of the Internet.

And mostly, it’s good news, except when poor judgements are made and people are taken advantage of. Scrutiny and oversight are needed, especially where children are involved. However, when there are potential profits open to a corporation, the needs of society don’t count. More

Pentagon bullies and trolls and other flame throwers intent on closing down the net

2 Comments

Isn’t it strange?  Everyone of us who uses the net to get real news, to by pass the MSM, who says anything to refute the propaganda coming from our own government, can be located, tracked, listed, identified, spied on and put under surveillance.  Our emails can be read, our contacts flagged and our web surfing and commenting is all data-mined and sent off to one of several intelligence agencies that now exist primarily for surveillance of the American people especially if we use Google.

 

The pentagon has also jumped into the game with its domestic spying program.  Pentagon bullies and trolls are now appearing all over the web inserting flame comments into sites that do not buy into government statements and policies or especially those sites which use the governments own actions, policies and documents to expose the truth.  The intent is to derail the discussions.  These people also attempt to bait writers and other posters into making statements that could be construed and twisted into threats against the government or population at large.  The overall intent is to end any non-government approved dialogue.  Another avenue being utilized by the spies who hate us are the Fusion Centers.

 

As the momentum gathers to end net neutrality, to convert the net to a “pay per view or access” the information gathered from these flame throwers who have been intentionally planted on sites all over the web, will be converted and used as evidence of the “threat” of an open net.  You see, we have to be frightened into believing our very lives are threatened by some boogey man out there who exists because the net is free, and information is easily accessible.

 

An article in the New York Times makes this comment:

 

“What a new Internet might look like is still widely debated, but one alternative would, in effect, create a “gated community” where users would give up their anonymity and certain freedoms in return for safety.” 

 

This simply means converting it to a “site for sale” giving monopolists such as Google the right to section off and sell access to various areas of the net.

 

We must give up “certain freedoms”:  like the right to privacy, free speech…little things like that.  Of course if you won’t give those things up you won’t be safe.  They’ll make sure you won’t be safe.  But at this point, who will keep us safe from our own government who seems to be intent on spying and targeting a fair number of us for disagreeing with the things they do and say?

 

As we come closer to having the net closed off to us, the articles will become more frequent, the reporting by MSM will be elevated citing the threats from so-called cyber-terrorism.  We will be carefully conditioned and readied to have the net shut down, for our own safety of course! 

 

Look for the increase in reports of child trafficking, and pornography.  These are serious problems and the government is well aware of them.  These reports will increase as the efforts to close the web builds.  Not that these things weren’t already a problem, they just weren’t made big enough to use as an excuse. We have to be buried in a constant avalanche of already known information to make the seriousness of these things appear to be a threat to us all in order to move forward with as little opposition as possible.

 

For those of us who will fight back?  We will be portrayed by the MSM and politicians who advocate the censoring of the net as having no morals or values.  We won’t love our country enough to give up our rights to speak out; we won’t love God enough (or at all) and that’s why we won’t support the efforts to close the net down.  Every effort will be made to demonize us and to portray us as anti-American, unpatriotic and possibly somehow linked in some vague way to those who do abuse the net.  Like the Pentagon.

 

My question is this……how is the government able to find us, track email, plant trolls on blogs, add names to “watch” lists and gather all the information they can on us, including everywhere we go on the net and who we talk to……but they can’t locate a kiddie porn site owner, they can’t find the individuals trafficking in human beings?  How is that possible?

 

The greatest threat to fascism and a government against its own people is the right to free speech and the access to information.  Knowledge is power, and knowledge has apparently reached a level where it has become a serious threat to the government.

 

© 2009 Marti Oakley

 

 

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/air-force-mater.html

http://www.infowars.com/state-fusion-centers-and-pentagon-run-fbi-programs-spy-on-americans/

%d bloggers like this: