THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG

September 9, 2020

ppjg Chuck Frank, corruption, Government, The PPJ Gazette big government corruption, Chuck Frank, congress, deep state, federal prosecutors, foreign governments, national security, offshore banks, The PPJ Gazette, whistleblowers Leave a comment

Author; Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The “deep state” is a real phenomenon and has been around for decades and could well be traced as far back as President Kennedy’s assassination and later the murder of his brother, Robert Kennedy.The corrupt players connected to the deep state that extend their tentacles into the federal agencies, Congress, state governments, major cities such as New York and San Francisco, foreign governments and offshore banks have been exposed through the years in twenty some books which were written by the author, Rodney Stich, before he passed away from cancer while in his 90’s a few years ago.

What comes to my mind is when I personally spoke with Rodney Stich, a former Federal Agent on three separate occasions which included a dinner engagement with his wife in Walnut Creek, CA., he shared with me various
investigations that he made using personal notarized declarations from persons that documented highly corrupt operations that had been covered up by various government entities where millions of dollars or undisclosed
favors were usually present and kept under the radar.In one of his books written in 2007, “Congress And Other Cesspools”, he notes on page 172 a letter that he had sent on March 21, 2007 to the inspector General, Glen A. Fine along with a complaint relating to actions and the obstruction of justice by DOJ personnel who were responsible for “blocking” information that was needed by a federal prisoner for their legal defense. The same letter that had been written which was quite lengthy was also sent to Senators Charles Schumer, Edward Kennedy, Harry Reid, Joseph Biden, Ted Stevens, Patrick Leahey, Dianne Feinstein, Arlene Specter, Representatives, Conyers, and finally Nancy Pelosi.

NONE OF THESE PEOPLE RESPONDED TO THE SAME LETTER OF COMPLAINT THAT WAS SENT TO THE DOJ.

Here is an ongoing example of a “deep state” scenario that Rodney Stich had documented in many of his books who also became a victim in Federal court with his own documentary evidence that was “blocked” in order to destroy his innocence but then is tied to government favoritism and various agencies along with massive cover ups and crimes. This trick becomes a regular pattern when used by federal prosecutors and is a typical when using the weak excuse of protecting “national security.” It is corruption at its fullness while justice that is expected in a court
room disappears at light speed through deliberate disinformation! How is it that the people’s rights are trampled upon regularly by entities of the federal government when government is the one who is supposed to be protecting the rights of the people and is meant to be the bearer of liberty and justice for all.? Our system has been massively broken.

A solution and the game changer in his instance is direly needed. Yet, Congress and certain federal agencies want to keep their power which includes the same corrupt system and resists being changed because sinister players in and outside of government and also Congress are making mega millions keeping the corrupt system in place. To find out more about big government corruption order Rodney Stich’s books online and also my book “HOUSE OF LORDS: THIS TRAIN IS BOUND FOR GLORY”, Author, Charles W.
Frank

OPEN LETTER TO CONGRESS

December 16, 2019

ppjg corruption, Fed Reserve & Fiat Currency, Government, government sponsored terrorism, propaganda, The PPJ Gazette CIA, civil dissension, congress, conspiracy analysts, corruption, Federal Reserve, Government, government sponsored terrorism, impeachment, military, national security, perpetual wars, propaganda, The PPJ Gazette, tyranny, wall street, Wall street Bankers, war-mongering 2 Comments

J.Q. Public
freedom@Qmail.nix

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear Congresscritter,

The impeachment farce in Congress is the same modus operandi that has been used by Wall Street to create civil dissension and establish puppet governments with tyrannical control worldwide for decades. Can we prevent such an occurrence in the United States ?

Wall Street created the CIA in 1946 using their crony Allen Dulles to hide their nefarious war-mongering, such as getting the US involved in WW I and WW II, under a guise of “national security.” Then the CIA used that cover to thwart President Eisenhower’s attempt for Peace talks with Khrushchev by sabotaging their own U-2 flight. Then they sabotaged their own invasion of Cuba in a failed attempt to commit the U.S to all-out war with Cuba [Dulles countermanded JFK’s order]. Then they labeled JFK a traitor when they discovered his secret back-channel peace talks with Moscow (along with JFK’s attack on the Federal Reserve). Mark Lane, John Groden, and Mark North claim the CIA killed JFK. Then they successfully impeached (with bogus CIA corrupted evidence and MSM hype) RMN after he closed the CIA school to teach Tibetans to invade China, and then RMN destroyed the CIA’s straw enemy by opening trade with China in addition to his Midnight Massacre of 1700 CIA agents. Then they schemed to prevent the reelection of JEC [OCTOBER SURPRISE] after he torpedoed a nuclear powered aircraft carrier and his Halloween Massacre of 700 CIA agents. “Conspiracy theorists” conclude 1000 architects and engineers, and Rebekah Roth, present a scenario that appears impossible without the CIA and US military involvement on 9/11. Then the CIA lied to create war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, among many other coups by Wall Street, behind cutouts, as indicated by John Perkins.

Wall Street bankers have initiated and utilized the military to engage in perpetual warfare by lies and deception for their economic profit since 1915. This continuity of influence and control over government policy is now evidenced in the Ukraine and is leading the impeachment fraud against the President after his attempts to avoid nuclear hostility with a super Power. Wall Street cannot tolerate peace.

What action can be taken to discontinue the madness of these psychopathic homicidal megalomaniacs? Well, may I respectfully suggest WHENSE THE DEEP STATE may be one consideration. Ref https://ncc-1776.org/tle2019/tle1050-20191208-10.html

J.Q. Public
freedom@Qmail.nix

Ref. https://ppjg.me/2019/11/18/the-federal-reserve-a-different-view/
How can Fed be used to foreclose on the $22 trillion National Debt for the benefit of Wall Street?
Ref. https://ppjg.me/2019/11/18/scenario-of-national-bankruptcy/.

The Growing War Against Whistleblowers

October 15, 2019

ppjg corruption, Government, Marti Oakley, The PPJ Gazette, whistleblowers administrative agency corruption, agency mismanagement, corruption, Government, government fraud government discrimination, Marti Oakley, national security, President Trump, The PPJ Gazette, TS Radio Network, Whistleblower's Summit, whistleblowers 1 Comment

Marti Oakley

TS Radio Network

contact: tsrad1@outlook.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Whistleblowers are not “leakers” as you claim Mr. Trump. They have not threatened national security nor revealed any government secrets that would jeopardize the public safety. And, they do it knowing full well that the full force of that agency will come down on them with every intention of destroying every last day of their lives. Whistleblowers are people with enough integrity, character and courage to speak up about all the wrong-doing that costs us all in one way or another. And in government, these are rare individuals. Have some respect, please.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We have a president who appears to be unable to differentiate between whistleblowers who expose massive mismanagement, dysfunction and abuse of federal agency positions which cost the American taxpayers billions, as opposed to those who “leak” national security secrets that expose the ugly underbelly of a government that is obviously terrified, and which despises its own population.

As a career businessman, it would seem far more likely that you, Mr. Trump, would have an appreciation for those who expose the gross mismanagement of federal agencies that affect the bottom line for all of us, including you. Instead, as the President it appears that you are agitated and determined to lump these people in with those who have exposed so-called national security secrets. Consistently referring to whistleblowers as “leakers”, you constantly put one in mind of the spoiled, privileged child. Temper tantrum to follow.

Note to President Trump: Whistleblowers who expose the mismanagement and waste and abuses occurring across all federal agencies have exposed no national security secrets. They are not leakers as you claim. They are doing their jobs with more integrity and character than the majority of individuals who have secured a cushy federal position and who have proceeded to abuse that position. I would think you, as a businessman, would appreciate more than most the financial impact of allowing these kinds of activities to continue. Or, are you wanting us to believe that exposing the abuses of public trust has some unknown tie to keeping us all safe? From what?

But then again, what do these abusers have to worry about? All their legal fees are paid by taxpayers. When the evidence is so massive that there is no denying the charges against them are valid, they are allowed to resign their position in order to retain all their federal benefits.

But what happens to that whistleblower who stepped forward and did the right thing?

TSA In Our Airports: The Shaming of America

April 20, 2019

ppjg corruption, Government, Police State, The PPJ Gazette airports, corruption, Government, government thugs, national security, physical assaults, Police State, sexual assaults, The PPJ Gazette, TSA, TSA agents, TSA terrorists 4 Comments

Mike Bowman

OPINION

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As if the intentional stalling out of flights was not enough to ruin your trip, the raging and screaming TSA agents add another layer to the attack on flyers that begins when they enter the airport. Never will you encounter a more aggressive and perverse group of individuals, than those who work for “national security”, TSA. What happens in these individual’s minds when they don that uniform and tin badge, is beyond comprehension for the average person. What passengers are routinely exposed to is a planned assault that has little to nothing to do with keeping anyone safe, and more to do with acclimating the public to not only produce their papers but to submit and comply to the orders from government thugs.

Our airports, outfitted with billions and billions of dollars in high tech scanners, should be sufficient for determining the safety of passengers. But, no. For some reason the slightest movement will produce a screen covered in little yellow squares indicating to the TSA agent that you are a prime target for molestation and hyper aggressive behavior. Now, at this point, as the agents are all screaming “you moved!”, wouldn’t the rational thing be for you to enter the scanner a second time and try to hold still? If they know that’s what caused the yellow blocking on the screen, wouldn’t a reasonable person think it more logical to have you enter the scanner a second time? Not so fast! You are dealing with TSA personnel here and if there is anything they aren’t, it is rational and logical. More

FBI’s Comey: No Charges Against Hillary

July 5, 2016

ppjg corruption, Government corruption, criminal racketeering, DOJ on Clinton, FBI covers Clinton, Government, Hillary Clinton, memory hole blog, national security 2 Comments

Talk about a dual system of “justice”. There is no justice at all. IT is corruption from top to bottom. The biggest criminal racket in the country is the federal government.

TRUTH & JUSTICE UNCENSORED

March 8, 2016

ppjg Chuck Frank, Constitution Chuck Frank, common law, Constitution, double speak, Fast & Furious, legislative powers, national security, uncensored 1 Comment

Chuck Frank

__________________________________________________________________________

“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ~ James Madison, Federalist Papers 47, 30 January 1788.

______________________________________________________________________________

Only in America: George Orwell’s novel, titled 1984 reveals “double speak” and massive surveillance which is now being used 99% of the time. “Double speaks” expanded version = elections, secret files, lies, fabrications, censorship, false flags, propaganda, trashed e-mails brought back to life, mainstream media blackouts, Google censorship, political correctness, disinformation, and finally, “secret justice”, (i.e. when bogus “national security issues” prevent a Jury investigation or evidence from being introduced to a judge.)

And this is all done in the name of bogus legalism intended to increase the power of government and their job security. I call it Babylon revisited.

We the people are the public and they have the right to know the truth and especially so when there are hundreds and hundreds of state and federal agencies which exalt their “lordship” but regularly hide behind their own major corruption which may include other lives and livelihoods being lost due to the purposeful intent of government agencies and their mission which is meant to coverup their own unlawful deeds.

And when the federal courts and judges get involved, more often than not, they will favor their own, which is the government.

Therefore, it is expedient that the American people be protected from a common occurrence that happens when courts traditionally use a tactic claiming that there is a “national security issue” while
shielding government corruption. Consequently, by blocking key incriminating evidence, government becomes insulated from wrong doing on a regular basis.

The “Fast and Furious” debacle is a perfect example.

The CIA Report: The Shaming of America

December 10, 2014

ppjg DOMESTIC TERRORISM, Marti Oakley black ops prisons, CIA sponsored terrorism, CIA torture, DOMESTIC TERRORISM, keeping us safe, Marti Oakley, national security, School of the America's, War OF Terror, war on terror 8 Comments

Marti Oakley

____________________________________________

Regardless of who released the report on the CIA, the fact is, this is a tragic and shameful moment for America. What was done under the false pretense of “keeping us safe” is nothing less than the stuff of nightmares. That any one of us thinks or believes that the sadistic, torturous, murderous actions of the CIA was somehow acceptable because of 9/11 is in itself a tragedy. The billions spent building hidden prisons, designing facilities to exact horrific pain and death, is exceeded in its sickest moments in knowing that truly sick and malignant individuals actually took the time to design these facilities for effect.

Consider the fact that all of this torture has done nothing other than to inflame the hatred of the United States by people around the world. Is this not counter productive?

Are you really so naïve as to think they have not done this here at home to some of our fellow countrymen, or would not do the same to you if they decided to? These people have no boundaries. You and I, along with billions of others around the globe mean nothing to them. What they have happily done to others is just a moment away from happening to you. Or, were you thinking they thought you were far too special to practice their torture on? More

Are We Being Had… (again)? Are We Being Hosed, or Had?

August 28, 2014

ppjg Uncategorized 9/11 truth movement, 911 Grassroots, Ferguson, ISIS, James Hufferd, national security, Russia, tear gas, Ukraine 2 Comments

by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Are We Being Hosed, or Had?

“No need for them to actually do it! It only needs to be made to look like they did to mobilize in convenient abject

cowardice the vast majority of the population – something we in the

budding (but never flourishing) 9/11 Truth Movement have warned they could pull on us again ever since 2001.

The Costly Burden of Illegal Immigration

July 30, 2014

ppjg DOMESTIC TERRORISM, Immigration DOMESTIC TERRORISM, illegal immigration, Immigration, national security, Office of Refugee Resettlement, Shelley Kais, Southern Arizona, Tuberculosis, Unaccompanied Alien Children 1 Comment

By: Shelley Kais

Ms. Kais is a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Arizona’s 2nd Congressional District. http://www.shelleykaisforcongress.com/

__________________________________________________________

What most Americans don’t yet understand is that the arrival of tens of thousands of Central Americans is no surprise: not to the President, not to the federal government’s Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), not to the many other federal agencies whose budgets have increased in recent years in preparation for it, and not to Congress, which approves those budgets.

One Nation Sinking – Tyranny At The Helm

May 28, 2014

ppjg CORPORATIONS, corruption, Government CORPORATIONS, corruption, county governance, currency collpase, Government, Memorial Day, national security, R.E. Sutherland, United States Government, United States of America, US Code 28 sect 3002, USG 7 Comments

DISCLAIMER: The following is not intended as legal advice; instead, it is sent for Education and Discussion Purposes Only….the Reader is responsible for all thoughts and actions gained from introspection.
By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today is Memorial Day. Soldiers are remembering their fallen comrades; hence it is a good time to reflect on the future for our nation. Are we freer than we were a decade ago?

No. Our nation has slowly become entangled in a web of deceit that was inspired from inside the Beltway of Washington, D.C. Those of us who choose to learn, study, and discern the direction of the United States of America know that things are not good and not as we are told.

The following simple treatise of logic is for those who will think. It is not for the enslaved, stupid men who choose to be obedient, while losing every penny they earn, their land, and their freedom. Carry on as you wish. This information is for freedom lovers.

First, the legal history of our country does not match the story given to us during childhood.

We are not a free nation and never have been. The loans from the King of England to the wealthy aristocrats, who obeyed the King, who created the American colonies under contracts, and who gave allegiance to his commands in 1776…are on the record. We are still under the British rule, which is operated through The Crown, using the Worshipful Companies that are controlled via the Vatican per the Forever Treaty of 1213. The Magna Carta caused control of The Crown (i.e., international banking cartel) to pass from the King of England to the Vatican. Perform your own due diligence. It is on the records.

Second, on May 21, 2014, Russia and China sealed a contract that closed the door on the U.S. Dollar, which was the world’s reserve currency used as a Petrodollar.

They know all about the corruption in Washington, D.C., and they plan to end it. They will do so with or without the cooperation of the people in the USA. This also is not a secret.

Third, the communist agenda entered the USA long ago before President Lincoln rose to sit in the White House.

The Fabian Society formed around 1884, the year after Karl Marx died, and it promotes the gradual takeover by communism of nations. President Lincoln was never in control of the White House, because the influence of Mandel House was dominant behind the scenes and guided his thinking. When Lincoln began to move away from the agenda, he was killed. Lincoln went against The Crown and its Crown Agents. More

Existing as an Political Atheist

March 23, 2014

ppjg Government Constitution, District of Criminals, gay marriage, Government, israel, Marti Oakley, national security, NSA Spying, political atheism, political party's, PPJ Gazette 5 Comments

Follow @MartiOakley

_________________________________________________________________

“When we cannot believe anything that comes from our elected officials; when lies are accepted and expected from the same and are considered par for the course, it may be time to reassess who we are and what we are willing to endure in the way of political candidates.”

____________________________________________________

Most of us have dispensed with the fictional divisions of party lines, having concluded that the lies and egregious conduct occurs with regularity in both factions of the one party system that exists in the District of Criminals. While some seem to think referring to Washington D.C. in this manner is disrespectful, I disagree.

Our Constitution, or what is left of it, and many of our common laws are violated, struck down, and otherwise unlawfully tampered with by the very same people who swore to uphold them. (Is this not an criminal act?) Anyway, that was the deal, right? Yet, everyday we see those same officials disregard the Constitution, break the common laws, profit from selling their office and votes to some corporation, or in any number of ways violate the very tenets of their office. What happened to those promises made before election? And why are we so willing to accept the deception and the ongoing betrayal’s of the public?

When we allow ourselves to be defined and labeled as right or left, conservative or liberal, have we not boxed ourselves in? Have we not limited our own opinions, beliefs, and our right to reach our own conclusions? And how many of us in an attempt to cement and secure our position as either right or left, sit quietly when we are exposed to ideas, plans and other constructs that do not resonate with us depending on our political leanings?

Rethinking us More

The U.S.: No longer a free Republic

October 22, 2013

ppjg DOMESTIC TERRORISM, Government Constitution, corrupt politicians, Council on Foreign Relations, creating new states, District of Criminals, DOMESTIC TERRORISM, economic policies, global misery, Government, Marti Oakley, national security, Police State, republic, secession petitions, Trilateral Commission, wars-for-profit 5 Comments

Follow @MartiOakley___________________________________________________________________________________________________

We are supposed to have a Republic. Of course we are supposed to be free, also.

The same people and organizations who have historically controlled government policy are the very same people who profit from its expansion. Government policy is not dictated by need, but rather, by greed. It is the greed of the few who make miserable the lives of the many.

There is little, if anything at all, that has issued from the District of Criminals that has not adversely affected the general population while conversely benefiting a select few. All of it cloaked behind the phrase “national security” and the chronic threats of attacks from unidentified and most times literally, unidentifiable sources. If these can’t be found to any extent, they are created by agencies such as the FBI and CIA and paraded in front of the public as if they were real threats.

False Flags:

False flag operations are covert operations
conducted by   governments, corporations, or other organizations, which
are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations
appear   as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is
derived from the   military concept of flying false colors; that is,
flying the flag of a country   other than one’s own. False flag
operations are not limited to war and   counter-insurgency operations,
and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

This would appear to be the proverbial case of dangling something bright and shiny in front of the eyes (in this case “foreign terrorists”) to divert you from the real threat festering in clear view, of anyone daring to actually look at who the real terrorists are. We know them; we elected them.

The national security shell game

I have spoken often to the fact that the crux of the overly used phrase “national security” has nothing to do with the collective public. It is a system of propaganda, false flag attacks, wars of aggression waged to steal another country’s assets and exists to serve the interest and protection of those who created it. National Security is not predicated upon keeping the country safe from terrorists or harm, but to keep those who promote this ideology safe from us, the public. More

You can’t defend freedom by eliminating freedom

October 15, 2013

ppjg DOMESTIC TERRORISM, Government alleged terrorist activity, District of Criminals, DOMESTIC TERRORISM, domestic terrorists, federal corporation, freedom, Government, human rights, national security, southern border 13 Comments

Follow @MartiOakley

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

“As a country we have been attacked and overtaken. It was not a foreign terrorist who took us down; it was the enemies inside the gates that proliferated in the District of Criminals.”

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

You can’t defend freedom by eliminating freedom, or by terrorizing your own country.

This is not the America I grew up in. Maybe it never was what I had believed it to be. Regardless, what is before us now as a nation, is the growing police state complete with total surveillance and the targeting of any individual as a possible “domestic terrorist” for expressing their own thoughts, for rejecting government policies that are meant to limit or eradicate any freedom we may have had.

The 9/11 Decade and the Decline of U.S. Democracy

The Bush Administration created the “war on terror” paradigm not to protect us from future attack, although that was what they claimed, but rather to put in place a radical expansion of power that sought to place the president outside domestic and international law.

A perusal of the laws passed by congress and presidents many of which are a direct attack on freedom and liberty, do not affect terrorists in the least. These laws, all passed with the caveat that it was necessary if they were to keep us safe, affect no one but US citizens. They have no bearing on terrorism and are only the excuse being used to keep you quiet as they continue limiting your freedom and expanding the federal corporation.

One of the greatest freedoms we had, was the freedom to be left alone by government. The NSA spy grid and the massive data collection center in Utah are the official end to any pretense of privacy. We have a government populated by people who have in essence, declared war on the country as a whole. Just because they have not yet opened fire on us, does not mean they do not consider us their sworn enemies or, that they would not move immediately to wipe us off the face of the earth should we become too insistent on our freedom. Nevertheless, we do insist on preserving our freedom wherever and whenever possible. More

Government Hypocrisy Preceeding Attack on Syria

September 4, 2013

ppjg Constitution, depleted uranium, DOMESTIC TERRORISM chemical weapons, depleted uranium, District of Criminals, national security, Syria, US bioweapons labs, war, white phosphorus weapons 5 Comments

Follow @MartiOakley___________________________________________________________________________________________________

You won’t hear anyone say the word, war.

This parsing of words, this come-to-be expected word weaseling is nothing new. Kerry, Dempsey, the President and every Senator never uttered the word “war” which would require the consent of congress to wage. The refraining from using this word and instead referring to the war plans for Syria as a “strike, intervention or action”, is what the President is relying on to by-pass congress and the Constitution. As long as no one dares call it a war, there appears to be no need for the President to get congress’s consent.

________________________________________________________________________________________

As the country rises up and resoundingly rejects any action of any kind in Syria, the propaganda is running knee deep in the District of Criminals. Because of the decades long stream of what has turned out to be faulty “intelligence”, outright lies about whatever fictional threat they were using to to attack another nation in order to seize their assets (oil) and to depose one government after another only to install a government more to our liking, we are faced with another needless war.

The US Senate is meeting and discussing how and why they intend to start another senseless war, this time in Syria. The pretentiousness of these discussions borders on the absurd and is an insult to the intelligence of America. Continually citing “intelligence”, human, satellite and other methods of spying, Senator’s Menendez and Corker are followed by the new Secretary of State, John Kerry, among others. Each of them attempting to somehow tie the civil war in Syria to the national security of the United States. This will last for hours of course, due to the fact that there is no connection. This makes the argument particularly tedious.

Among the weakest arguments heard over the last several days; “It would make us appear weak”. Well now, if ever there was an argument for bombing and terrorizing another nation on the other side of the globe, it would have to be our big giant national ego. Apparently, our government believes that the Syrian people are not terrorized quite enough as a result of internal turmoil and the proper response to this would be to create more turmoil, more terror and to destroy everything in sight along with “collateral” damage. This means men, women AND children will be unilaterally harmed or killed by our actions.

Supposedly vast intelligence exists to indicate that a chemical attack actually took place. This intelligence came from the same sources who supplied the intelligence for the Iraq war. You remember…….the evidence that never was?

Collateral damage in Syria is said to be deemed to be “low” in this instance. So,.. what? So are we going to accept 5,000 men, women and children being killed by us? 10,000? 20,000? What’s the magic number?

IF I understand this correctly, gassing people is a big problem, but blowing them up along with their entire community so that you can overthrow their government and seize their national assets, is not. More

Financial catastrophe imminent?

October 10, 2011

ppjg eugenics, Fed Reserve & Fiat Currency BIS, central banks, eugenicists, financial crisis, GMO, national security, over-population, wall street 3 Comments

Sir Mervyn King Thinks He

Sees a Financial Crisis

Bank of England Chief Has an Epiphany

Financial catastrophe imminent?

Uncle Merv ought to know. He and his ilk at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS—that owns and funds the world’s central banks; the only banks that can print money for a country) in Basel, Switzerland, and the ten square mile area known as The Mall in Washington, D.C., worked to set it up.

A three-minute backgrounder. (again).

Wall Street and England’s parliament, and their confederates, are the designated lightening rods to draw the rocks during this economic “collapse.” More

SMART METERS: A triple threat

July 26, 2011

ppjg SMART METERS CPUC, HEALTH, Marti Oakley, microwaves, national security, PG&E, PPJG, private property, radiation, smart meters, unrevealed contracts 27 Comments

_________________________________________________________

“Along with the known health hazards, the unwarranted and unlawful surveillance and inflated energy rates after installation of a SMART METER, is the threat of compromised national security. “

______________________________________________

As a nationwide revolt is growing against the invasive and costly electric Smart Meters, public utilities and corporations, intent on putting the entire nation under surveillance unlawfully, not to mention creating a massive health threat, are moving quickly to install phase 2 of the SMART GRID: Gas Smart Meters. It won’t stop there; they are planning on rolling out SMART water meters as quickly as possible.

On March 31, 2011 in Capitola California, it was reported that PG & E spokesman Jeff Smith said a total of 17 of the wireless devices were installed on residences and businesses where existing meters had been damaged by floods. Fifteen of the meters were for gas and two were for electric.

The City Council placed a moratorium on Smart Meter installations in February, though the California Public Utilities Commission has sole authority over PG&E.” (This authority over PG&E pertains ONLY to PG&E and cannot be construed and extended to mean authority over private citizens and communitites)

The CPUC has no authority to override a city council inititiative and to move ahead with a private corporate contract between CPUC and PG&E that the public is unaware of, has not seen and did not enter into. More

Deconstructing the sovereign United States: This is national security?

January 30, 2011

ppjg corruption, Government assets, Bush 1, Bush 2, customs, EB-5 visa, employment, foreign investors, Free trade zones, FTZ's, Homeland Security, infrastructure, jurisdiction, Marti Oakley, national security, SPP 16 Comments

_________________________________________________

“While we allowed ourselves to be pre-occupied and entertained, while we became lazy and apathetic and allowed ourselves to be drawn into fictional political divides, our own government divided our country up, sold us off and are on the verge of the final coup’ which will render us without land, freedom, wealth or country; or at the very least a country to call our own. “

_________________________________________________

National security; this term has come to mean the terrorizing of legal US citizens by our own government. Any one or all of several spy agencies supposedly existing to protect us from terrorists, have made it evident that, “we the people” are the focus of their efforts. When speaking of national security I believe it is imperative to understand what that term in reality means:

National security is the protection of the corporate federal government, and by extension multi-national corporations that benefit from their unfettered access to the government, from the people of the (50) sovereign but united states. We the people are viewed as the greatest threat to a malevolent government and its partnering corporations and the expansion of what is becoming a full blown police state. The security the government desires is not from foreign terrorists, but rather, from us.

By now, any hopes any of us had that Obama was going to turn the tide, make things better for the country, or, that he would reverse the egregious laws passed by the neo-cons and executive orders issued by Bush the Dolt, have dissipated. Not only has Obama not undone the damage, he has carried it forward and continues the programs and plans unlawfully put in place by the previous administration and started a few of his own. We are in the end phase of a twenty year cycle of systematic deconstruction of the united States.

Laying the groundwork for programs to come was of course, the Bush 1 Executive Order of 1992, #12803. This executive order put the infrastructure of the states up for sale to anyone and everyone and began the wholesale selling off of our lands and structures to non-US interests. More

CIA: ROGUE AGENCY RUN AMUCK A compendium of websites, books, press releases, and deductions describing alleged CIA nefarious actions

January 4, 2011

ppjg corruption, Government Bush family, CIA, CIA Atrocities, congress, conspiracy, Dallas, FBI, high treason, JFK, murder, national security, theft 2 Comments

Contact: ppj.gazette5@gmail.com

__________________________________________________________

“_the airplane that had carried Mrs. Clinton the week before was found to not have a flight recorder on-board, the cause of the crash was not investigated, the fair weather was reported by the media to be foul, the three electronic guidance systems were reported to have malfunctioned at the same time or been altered to guide the airplane into a mountain, and individuals who might have known too much ended up dead. Strange. Some say Ron had a bullet hole.” More

WIKI-LEAKS PLANS TO RELEASE THE COMPUTERIZED CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL RECORDS OF ALL AMERICANS

January 3, 2011

ppjg Constitution, HEALTH databases, FBI, HSD, insurance companies, IRS, John Wallace, Liberty News Online, medical records, national security, obamacare 3 Comments

John Wallace Liberty News Online

___________________________________________________

“Given the well documented inefficiency with which our federal government does anything, I think it is safe to predict that mistakes from faulty data entries, loss medical records, mis-entered ID numbers, “down” computers, could lead to drastic and life-threatening medical problems or wrong medications being given to many patients. “

__________________________________________________

LNO: What are the American people going to do when Julian Assange of Wiki-Leaks decides, at some time in the future, to release the computerized confidential medical records of all Americans that have been obtained from a disgruntled employee of the new federal government’s central medical database? More

One more time: A citizens ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ #1(MOU) with the Federal Government

December 28, 2010

ppjg 1st Amendment, 2nd amendment, Constitution, CORPORATIONS, Food Safety, Government, MOU, NAFTA/CAFTA, National Animal Indentification System, State sovereignty civil ights, civil liberties, Codex Alimentarius, Constitution, cooperative agreements, CORPORATIONS, Fake food safety, farming, FDA, food safety, harmonization, HCAAP, HR 2749, illegal trade agreements, international agreeements, Marti Oakley, MOU's, NAIS, national security, premises ID, ranching, S 510, terrorism, united nations, USDA 20 Comments

Originally published in August 2009

Greetings:

Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama. I am sure you are fully aware of the intent and implications of MOUs, as each of you, in one way or another, uses them to establish the outlining of agreements between yourselves, collectively or individually, concerning the agreements you have made with individuals acting as state’s representatives or agencies; generally to avoid Constitutional prohibitions on your intended actions and in avoidance of the Constitution. I am using it in quite another fashion as you will see in the following text. More

Wiki-leak? Or pre-planned scare tactic?

December 2, 2010

ppjg corruption, INTERNET Assange, false flags, government terrorism, national security, wikileaks 3 Comments

Skype: 1-320-281-0585

So what are these people really upset about? Are they upset about the dirty world of US policy? Or, are they just angry that it got exposed? I suggest that they are upset about neither of these aspects; they are however playing a crucial roll in catapulting this “leak” into the public domain and attempting to frighten the public and whipping up a controlled frenzy at the same time. More

It isn’t God who is keeping track of our sins…..it is a Homeland Security satellite

August 25, 2010

ppjg corruption, Government CIA, Clear Act, cyber attacks, domestic agriculture, FBI, FDA, food, government spying, government surveillance, HSD, internet stalking, land, Marti Oakley, national security, natural resources, NSA, S 510, USDA, water 15 Comments

“As it turns out, it isn’t God who is keeping a list of our sins: It’s a Homeland Security satellite logging any and all information it can find and transmitting it to HSD, NSA, FBI, CIA, and your local fusion center along with twenty other spy agencies all of whom stalk the net in order to find out who is naughty and who is nice.” ____________________

I hear it every day from nearly everyone I speak to or correspond with; the overwhelming sense that we, as a nation, are under attack. The attack is not coming from unidentifiable enemies, nor is it coming from half crazed Mid-easterner’s who “hate us for our freedoms”. The attack is coming from our own government; it is our own government who hates us not only for our freedoms, but also for our refusal to go quietly into the intended one world government where we have neither rights, nor the right to continue to exist. More

Dozens Busted For Child Porn At Pentagon

July 24, 2010

ppjg corruption blackmail, child pornography, national security, pentagon, public officials, top security Leave a comment

Dozens of individuals with top security clearance status at the Pentagon are caught downloading, viewing and buying child pornography. Some have been prosecuted others have not. Strange how the law applies to some and not to others.

“A Bully Only Understands a Greater Force”

June 15, 2010

ppjg corruption flase flags, freedom, legislative war, NARLO.org, national security, political bullies, PROPERTY RIGHTS, tyranny 1 Comment

By Ron Ewart, President National Association of Rural Landowners and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues. We are spreading the message of American Freedom around the globe. © Copyright June 14, 2010 – All Rights Reserved

“The inescapable truth is, until those who seek freedom find the millions of dollars (if not billions) necessary to fund the lobby, judicial and legislative “war” we are in, we might just as well blow into the east wind, or all of us go fishing, because the outcome of this war has been all but decided, and not in freedom’s favor. “______________________

If a bully moves into your neighborhood and starts to throw his “weight” around, the bully’s neighbors have two choices ….. defeat the bully, or capitulate to his every whim for fear of igniting his wrath. This is the choice for America and every other country who is forced to confront the bully.

A bully has been in our “neighborhood” for at least 100 years and all we seemed to have done is to capitulate to the bully’s every whim. The bully’s whim grows more radical by the day. But there comes a time when we can no longer ignore the bully. His whims have entered into our personal lives in a big way and have come into the private, sacred sanctuary of our homes. Because of our apathy and capitulation, the bully feels emboldened to go even farther with his interference. Now his interference comes in the form of economic and political enslavement and after that, who knows what? More

US gun owners: redefining legal gun owners as terror suspects: S.2820

May 7, 2010

ppjg 2nd amendment, corruption 2nd amendment, constitutional rights, coprorate federal government, Gun banning, national security, terrorists Leave a comment

__________________________________

S.2820 Protect act of 2009, introduced December 1, 2009 in the Senate is co-sponsored by Senators, Lautenberg, Schumer, Levin, Reed, Feinstein, and Whitehouse. Stating their supposed political party affiliation is non-relevant; Each are members of the federal corporate government, and this bill is their effort to begin the process of disarming the American public using the terrorism/national security rationale which is the now common Ace –in-the-hole when the intent is to really screw the American people out of their Constitutional rights and liberties. More

A news flash for the District of Criminals: It is 9/11 everday on our southern border

May 3, 2010

ppjg Immigration American traitors, border insecurity, illegal immigration, immigration violations, national security, protests, riot police, SWAT teams 2 Comments

I have a news flash for you jackasses in the District of Criminals….WE ARE UNDER ATTACK! It is 9/11 everyday on our southern border and for our citizens there. What? No NORTHCOM? No Swat teams? No riot police? No CIA? No FBI? No drones? No ADS systems or sonic weapons? No tanks rolling through like they do in many of our major cities? No satellite images to zero in on moving targets? Where are you guys? What? Do you just save that stuff for those radical American citizens who protest the ever growing corporate government that has been steadily killing off our country for the last several decades?

We can send troops all over the world to defend other people (only if they have assets we want), to bring democracy to people who don’t want it (after all, look at the example we have set) and appear out of no where when an earthquake occurs on an island. But we can’t defend America from an illegal invasion, or its citizens from an act of war coming from a neighboring country. You don’t see any threat there?

Just so I understand everything correctly and to make sure I have it all right, here is the state of our country:

Illegal aliens can march in our streets after breaking our laws,
availing themselves of whatever might be available
demanding some kind of “rights” and:
no one herds them into predetermined areas,
arrests them for immigration violations,
limits their free speech,
Refers to them as drunkards,
bomb-throwers,
gun-toters,
extremists
radicals
or threats to our democracy and our nation.

Approximately 25% of all prisoners in federal prisons for violent felonies are illegal immigrants. (their figures, not mine) Of course there’s money to be made there: Wall Street loves to sell them some “prisoner bonds”. Big business; especially with China.

If I protest as a natural born US citizen:

I have to get a permit
Go to a specially designated area
Be surrounded by riot police and swat teams
Be declared a possible “domestic terrorist” by Homeland Security
Put on all kinds of blacklists with any of the 20 or so spy agencies
Added to the McCarthyism Institute’s (SPLC) list of people they hate and make money off of hating.
Called a radical,
militant,
hate group participant
Called an extremist for standing up for my country
the constitution,
my rights,
my objections to the lack of law enforcement or border security
my objections to unconstitutional policies and acts by the federal government

Somehow, I am now a threat to America because I even mentioned the constitution or that I do have natural rights and believe our laws should be enforced. Just ask the SPLC, they have whole lists of groups no one ever heard of and can’t find most times who are on these lists they supply to the government.

I now somehow have no compassion, or empathy. I have lots of both, but I reserve it for my fellow Americans who are being systematically driven into poverty and overrun by a population that had no allegiance to its own country and certainly has none to ours.

And just so we fully understand each other: there is an all out war on our southern border. The Bush administration refused, and now Obama refuses to send troops to defend our border or our American citizens who are being kidnapped, murdered and harassed by Mexican drug cartels. 5,000 dead last year and 2,000 so far this year: but Obama has no interest in sending the military to secure that border any more than Bush did. It is cheap labor and a real economy buster to allow this illegal invasion to continue. And it proves that there is no real basis in truth for the claimed threats to our nation promoted by the government and the bogus Homeland Security Department.

And about all that “national security” crap that is used to pass one assault after another against the Constitution taking away our rights and giving our own government the right to detain indefinitely, without charges, to torture if they choose to, to withhold evidence, to have no evidence, to refuse us legal access, to know what we might be charged or for no charges at all……we just might be a “suspicious” person…..and we are American citizens?……why the hell weren’t you out in the streets protesting that one you bunch of Benedict Arnolds’.

And many thanks to those of you who turned on your own and marched and rallied in the streets with the illegals’ and against your neighbors, family members, and friends who lost their jobs, their homes and most everything they had. Why weren’t you marching in the streets then?

Where was all that compassion and empathy when this was happening? Did you make sure any of them had food? A warm place to sleep? Did you storm the District of Criminals demanding special rights for them? Hell no you didn’t!

These were American citizens, not these poor illegals’. You sat on your sofa and said it was all their fault. Never mind the banking and Wall Street corruption, the fraudulent mortgages, and the billions in bailouts to people who already had so much money they could never spend it all in ten lifetimes.

I have an idea!

Why don’t you gather up all your compassion and empathy and your illegal friends, and march on Mexico City? I’m sure the Southern Poverty Lie Center could finance the trip; their net worth this last year for selling hate for profit was about 175 mil. They can surely afford to convoy all of you down there in fine style.

Oh yeah. I forgot. In Mexico, they’ll shoot your sorry behinds right there in the street.

THE MAN MADE THREAT TO OUR SECURITY AT HOME

January 7, 2010

ppjg Immigration amnesty, government corruption, illegal immigration, Mexican army, Mexico, national security 1 Comment

www.mnsirproject.com

“How many illegal aliens are in the US? 10 million, 12 million 20 or 30 million? No one knows exactly, and that is my point…………. if those in charge of our national security have no idea WHO and HOW MANY individuals have successfully illegally entered the US, (many being deported numerous times only to enter yet once again), – how can they propose that they are insuring our safety?”

January 7,2010

In recent days, we have heard alarming details concerning the recent failure terrorist attempt of Flight 253, but to me what is more alarming, is the fact that this Administration continues to be reactive instead of proactive. Reactive in the fashion of continuing to demand more of our freedom and liberties from the people they are to protect than from those wishing to harm every man, woman and child in the US.

They feed the news waves with stories such as, the two Yemen terrorists killed on or around Jan. 4^th in an effort to comfort the concerns Americans are increasing feeling. Do not misunderstand – this information is very important no matter what your perspective of the incident is, but does this really bring feelings of security? And yet, we continue to handle individuals, such as the now lawyer’ed up terrorist, who wish us death, with kid gloves. More

The Case of the Biodevastation 7 :What the Police Won’t Apologize For

September 14, 2009

ppjg eugenics, Food Safety, GMO, Government ACLU, agriculture, anarchists, bio-engineering, biodev.org, biodiversity, corporate media, counterterrorism, Don Fitz, FBI, FOIA, genetic engineering, genetically contaminated food, Monsanto, national security, Percy Schmeiser, racism, small farms, Vandana Shiva, WAF, World Agricultural Forum Leave a comment

Reprinted with permission from the author.

What the Police Won’t Apologize For

By DON FITZ

In early September, St. Louis police will send an apology for their illegal arrest of biodiversity activists. Be assured that it will not mention their role in destroying public dialogue on dangers of genetically contaminated food.

On August 24, 2009, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Eastern Missouri announced that the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners would pay $13,500 to each of four anti-genetic engineering activists for violating their first and fourth amendment rights and would apologize to them for police actions in May, 2003. [1] That was when several hundred people gathered to protest the World Agricultural Forum [WAF] and hold the 7th Biodevastation Gathering to expose the racist use of genetic engineering in agriculture.

But the letter of apology is highly unlikely to address the most serious aspects of the repression. Do not expect the letter to say anything about helping to consolidate control of world agriculture and throwing 1 billion people off of small farms. Don’t look for the letter to mention the role of police in attempts to force genetically contaminated food on Africans with immuno-compromised health. And don’t be surprised if the letter contains not a word about St. Louis police entering into a conspiracy with Monsanto, the FBI and corporate media to eliminate public discussion of the potential threats of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

St. Louis police were not stand-alone players. As Daniel (digger) Romano wrote in the August 31 St. Louis Post-Dispatch “…Allied Intelligence [is] the private security agency hired by the WAF and its principle player, Monsanto, the biotech giant. Allied Intelligence told police ‘50,000 anarchists’ were coming to St. Louis to riot and wreak havoc on the city.” [2]

The police apology will certainly misdirect attention onto its own illegal and repulsive behavior of May, 2003: warrantless entry into a home where a woman was subjected to “an unlawful and humiliating strip search,” a second warrantless entry under the false claim of the building being condemned, and arresting several activists for “riding a bicycle without a license,” a crime which did not exist. [1]

Under the FBI Eye

Preparations for the Biodevastation 7 Gathering started in 2002 when Jim Scheff, an organizer for the Missouri Forest Alliance, called to tell me that the WAF would be meeting in St. Louis the upcoming year. He suggested that Biodevastation, which had been held in five cities after beginning in St. Louis in 1998, return to Monsanto’s home town so that people coming to WAF could hear a different view of biotechnology.

Documents obtained by the ACLU under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show that the FBI was deeply involved in scrutinizing many documents that I wrote for the event, including emails from my computer. The ACLU judged the FBI reports to be some “of the most troubling documents we received.” [3] More

A Citizen’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Federal Government – MOU #2: NATIONAL SECURITY

September 6, 2009

martijo Constitution, CORPORATIONS, Government, MOU bribes, Constitution, cooperative agreements, defacto laws, Homeland Security Department, house, Memorandum of Understanding, MOU, national security, president, sente 5 Comments

police2_dees

PPJG Original Article ppjg.wordpress.com

September 5, 2009 10:45 p.m CST

Greetings:

For you, MOUs are the terms and agreements of what, are in fact the first step in contractual agreements. MOUs are most often accompanied by cooperative agreements and funding (bribes) to implement what generally turns out to be egregious assaults to civil rights and liberties to the benefit of the federal government, linked so inextricably to corporate interests and global agreements.

Consider what follows a Memorandum of Understanding between me, Marti J. Oakley, and all of you, collectively cited in the above paragraph.

To Wit:

We (you and I) agree that each and every one of you holds your office as a result of election. And, that as a result of your victory and subsequent oath of office, you were expected to actually represent the people who put their faith and trust in you. The fact is you have violated this oath at every opportunity regardless of which party you claim allegiance to or which political philosophy you espouse at any given time.

In light of a profound understanding of how you have used and abused this trust and faith, I need you to understand how I (we) perceive you, i.e., your activities, your betrayals of these United States of America, your pandering to corporate interests, your illegal agreements with foreign governments and interests and ultimately what appears to be a very concerted effort to destroy our country and to convert the same into a region in some coveted global plantation.

Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama.

Because the instances of your acts against the people are so numerous, in this MOU, I will address only this one issue: National Security

Please consider this Memorandum of Understanding No. 2

Please be advised that no cooperative agreement with the anticipated funding (bribe money) will be forthcoming. You may consider this an “Unfunded Mandate” in the sense that I will never contribute one dime to the re-election efforts of any one of you. “We” in the following text means “WE THE PEOPLE.”

I (We) understand:

The term “national security” was simply the enabling and justifying of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which had been long planned and prepared prior to the attacks on 9/11 and has little to no affect on terrorist activities by foreign agents and was never intended as the primary function of this agency. When referring to DHS in this memorandum, it is to be considered inclusive of all the agencies now held and operating under the direction and control of DHS:

I (WE) understand:

We agree (you and I) that “National Security” has a different meaning and intent with regards to the corporation operating as the UNITED STATES, a.k.a., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”, than the meaning and intent as understood by the people of the (50) sovereign states, known as the [united states of America], independent of the Corporation and that with an understanding of this difference in intent and meaning comes the true meaning of “national security” as expressed by the Corporation operating as the federal government. That if any true and real intent was existing from foreign interests: More

U.S. national security threatened by Mexican Drug Cartels

July 17, 2009

ppjg Immigration DHS, drug cartels, drug trade, Mexico, Michael Webster, national security, US government Leave a comment

By Michael Webster: Syndicated Investigative Reporter. July 14, 2009 at 4:30 PM PDT

A dozen bound and tortured bodies were discovered dumped on the side of a remote highway in Michoacán. Police found the latest victims of the ongoing battle between rival drug traffickers on Monday. A threatening message was located near the beaten bodies of 11 men and one woman piled up and wrapped in a tarp, police revealed at the scene. Sadly, this has become a frequent occurrence: Last week, police found four bodies and a menacing note in the same spot.

Despite thousands of Mexican troops dispatched to numerous drug hot spots throughout the country, bloodshed has not decreased. U.S. authorities have offered a helping hand, pledging $1.4 billion through the Merida initiative in an attempt to help Mexico combat the cartels.

This reoccurring brutality stems from opposing drug cartels fighting over cocaine smuggling routes running up from Central America into the United States, the world’s top drug consumer. Because Mexico’s drug trade has become a very lucrative business—pulling in billions a year—having control of these routes ensures a hand in that money. More

States fight back against NAIS

January 1, 2009

martijo Constitution, Social Security administrative courts, bio weapons, codes, farms, NAIS, national security, Premise ID, Stakeholders, statutes, US labs 6 Comments

deesdeocbirds

In what can only be nothing more than a last ditch effort to eradicate all family farms and ranches, USDA has been caught repeatedly misrepresenting the voluntary National Animal Identification System and many states and groups are fighting back.

Without any approval or oversight from congress (none being needed as USDA operates as a self –regulating agency) USDA launched the NAIS with the usual bleating about [national security]. This threat was identified as the possibility that some rampant terrorist might somehow sneak some bio weapon into the country and infect a cow or corn field with some disease no doubt developed while hiding out in a cave somewhere on the other side of the world. I suppose its possible considering how insecure our ports of entry are.

More than likely, any attack of a bio weapons nature will come from one of the hundreds of bio labs now operating right here at home. The US is the most prolific producer of bio weapons in the world and has created and designed some of the most lethal biological weapons ever to have been cultivated.

Using the usual scare tactics of terrorist attacks, NAIS was launched with one goal in mind: eradicating family farms and ranches and establishing the complete takeover of all food producing lands and animals by huge multi-national corporations. Instrumental in this takeover is the designation of PREMISES ID, rather than property ownership.

Defining Premises within the law

Premises, signifies a formal part of a deed; and it is made to designate an estate.

Estates: Lands and tenements when generally called premises, or when particularly spoken of as, the premises, will be sold without reserve.

Conveyancing: That part in the beginning of a deed, in which are set forth the names of the parties, with their titles and additions, and in which are recited such deeds, agreements, or matters of fact, as are necessary to explain the reasons upon which the contract then entered into is founded;

and it is here also the consideration on which it is made, is set down, and the certainty of the thing granted. The technical meaning of the premises in a deed is every thing which precedes the habendum. (http://www.lectlaw.com/

Ha`ben´dum (hå`bĕn´dŭm) n. 1. (Law) That part of a deed which follows the part called the premises, and determines the extent of the interest of estate granted. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Habendum

Premises ID when viewed as a conveyance, could be construed to mean voluntarily abandoning what you owned. You convey control of your property by signing up for Premises ID, voluntarily abandoning your control of the property and subjecting the property to the newly acquired control of the government. Simply put: you just gave away your property and any rights to control or use that property as YOU see fit. At this point, legally, the property is no longer property but rather a premises and can be sold and controlled by someone other than you without reserve.

Premises signifies a formal part of a deed as mentioned above. To designate is to name or entitle and to create an estate. A premises has no protection under the United States Constitution and allows no exclusive rights of ownership. Once you have signed onto PREMISES ID, you have put your property into a state of legal limbo and have agreed to the new status as nothing more than a tenant farmer or sharecropper. Of course you will still have to make the mortgage payments until they take it from you.

Animals belong to the owner only so long as the owner retains possession of them. Once you enter into the National Animal Identification System, you no longer legally own the animals. They are no longer under your control, but rather under the control of the USDA.

The USDA uses the term [stakeholder] to identify those who own animals, implying under the statutes and codes you are a third party interest until the legal owner can be determined. No doubt in an administrative court which administers codes and statutes, not constitutional law. [you could not access a civil, constitutionally controlled court]

UN policy of STAMPING OUT/Agenda 21 rules for controlling access to food supplies and sources.

Using the UN Agenda 21 rules the USDA has adopted, there is no requirement for the USDA to vaccinate or to quarantine sick animals. In fact, they don’t even have to prove there is a real threat to the animal population, or to substantiate that any disease is present or a threat prior to stamping out entire animal populations in a six mile area surrounding the claimed infection or disease. The only requirement of the NAIS is that USDA follow UN Agenda 21 guidelines and eradicate all animal life in that area. That means every fish, bird, dog, cat, cow, horse, deer, raccoon etc……every living thing is killed in its tracks.

This isn’t about food safety, animal safety or national security: this is about food access and control.

How they get away with it

1946 Federal Administrative Procedures Act. The Administrative Procedures Act is the law which allows US Federal Agencies to create the rules and regulations they can then enforce. This Act is a subversion of constitutional government and should be repealed. It was another case of congress ceding its authority to a non-elected agency allowing the construction of codes and statutes and avoiding constitutional provisions and laws.

Using regulations they themselves created, in essence creating laws in abeyance of congress, the USDA can also amend any of these regulations and rules at will and at any point can rewrite their own laws. http://www.archives.gov/federalregister/laws/administrative-procedure/

NAIS violates the 1^st, 4^th, 5^th, and the 14^th Amendments, suspending and substantially violating the rights of private citizens without so much as a hearing in congress, not that it would do any good. Congress has shown itself consistently to support the most un-American and anti-constitutional policies and laws ever foisted on the American public and neither party is a protector of constitutional rights.

Its difficult to know that any time we are dealing with our own government or its agencies, we must constantly be on guard for hidden agendas, the hiding of hostile intent, or the practice of [altered functions]. This means that although the thing being promoted may have a good and beneficial purpose if applied as it is marketed, an altered function which is hidden, destructive or implemented with malice will be the reality.

Kudos, to all of you out there fighting this battle to keep government from controlling our land and animals and our right to chose the foods we want to consume.

http://www.nonais.org/

Website devoted to fighting NAIS. Technical Documents section: [Cooperative Agreements] that the USDA has with each State and full text of NAIS directive.

Other resources:

http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p141.htm

http://www.tofga.org/

http://www.farmandranchfreedom.org/

info@picfa.org

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/

http://libertyark.net/

http://arkansasanimalproducers.8k.com/

http://www.vicfa.net/

www.dogpolitics.com/my_weblog/2007/06/mary-zanoni-of-.html

www.farmandfood.org/newscommentary/articles_past/News_apr06.htm

Bush uses Presidential Directive to establish total surveillance state

November 30, 2008

ppjg Constitution, REAL ID abuse of power, Biometrics, fingerprint, iris recognition, national security, Police State, presidential directives, REAL ID, surveillance 2 Comments

June 5, 2008

National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive

White House News

NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD — 59
HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD — 24

SUBJECT: Biometrics for Identification and Screening to Enhance National Security

Purpose

This directive establishes a framework to ensure that Federal executive departments and agencies (agencies) use mutually compatible methods and procedures in the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information of individuals in a lawful and appropriate manner, while respecting their information privacy and other legal rights under United States law.

Scope

(1) The executive branch has developed an integrated screening capability to protect the Nation against “known and suspected terrorists” (KSTs). The executive branch shall build upon this success, in accordance with this directive, by enhancing its capability to collect, store, use, analyze, and share biometrics to identify and screen KSTs and other persons who may pose a threat to national security.

(2) Existing law determines under what circumstances an individual’s biometric and biographic information can be collected. This directive requires agencies to use, in a more coordinated and efficient manner, all biometric information associated with persons who may pose a threat to national security, consistent with applicable law, including those laws relating to privacy and confidentiality of personal data.

(3) This directive provides a Federal framework for applying existing and emerging biometric technologies to the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of data in identification and screening processes employed by agencies to enhance national security, consistent with applicable law, including information privacy and other legal rights under United States law.

(4) The executive branch recognizes the need for a layered approach to identification and screening of individuals, as no single mechanism is sufficient. For example, while existing name-based screening procedures are beneficial, application of biometric technologies, where appropriate, improve the executive branch’s ability to identify and screen for persons who may pose a national security threat. To be most effective, national security identification and screening systems will require timely access to the most accurate and most complete biometric, biographic, and related data that are, or can be, made available throughout the executive branch.

(5) This directive does not impose requirements on State, local, or tribal authorities or on the private sector. It does not provide new authority to agencies for collection, retention, or dissemination of information or for identification and screening activities.

Definitions

(6) In this directive:

(a) “Biometrics” refers to the measurable biological (anatomical and physiological) and behavioral characteristics that can be used for automated recognition; examples include fingerprint, face, and iris recognition; and

(b) “Interoperability” refers to the ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged.

Background

(7) The ability to positively identify those individuals who may do harm to Americans and the Nation is crucial to protecting the Nation. Since September 11, 2001, agencies have made considerable progress in securing the Nation through the integration, maintenance, and sharing of information used to identify persons who may pose a threat to national security.

(8) Many agencies already collect biographic and biometric information in their identification and screening processes. With improvements in biometric technologies, and in light of its demonstrated value as a tool to protect national security, it is important to ensure agencies use compatible
methods and procedures in the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric information.

(9) Building upon existing investments in fingerprint recognition and other biometric modalities, agencies are currently strengthening their biometric collection, storage, and matching capabilities as technologies advance and offer new opportunities to meet evolving threats to further enhance national security.

(10) This directive is designed to (a) help ensure a common recognition of the value of using biometrics in identification and screening programs and (b) help achieve objectives described in the following: Executive Order 12881 (Establishment of the National Science and Technology Council); Homeland Security Presidential Directive‑6 (HSPD‑6) (Integration and Use of Screening Information to Protect Against Terrorism); Executive Order 13354 (National Counterterrorism Center); Homeland Security Presidential Directive‑11 (HSPD‑11) (Comprehensive Terrorist Related Screening Procedures); Executive Order 13388 (Further Strengthening the Sharing of Terrorism Information to Protect Americans); National Security Presidential Directive‑46/Homeland Security Presidential Directive‑15 (NSPD-46/HSPD-15) (U.S. Policy and Strategy in the War on Terror); 2005 Information Sharing Guidelines; 2006 National Strategy for Combating Terrorism; 2006 National Strategy to Combat Terrorist Travel; 2007 National Strategy for Homeland Security; 2007 National Strategy for Information Sharing; and 2008 United States Intelligence Community Information Sharing Strategy.

Policy

(11) Through integrated processes and interoperable systems, agencies shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, make available to other agencies all biometric and associated biographic and contextual information associated with persons for whom there is an articulable and reasonable basis for suspicion that they pose a threat to national security.

(12) All agencies shall execute this directive in a lawful and appropriate manner, respecting the information privacy and other legal rights of individuals under United States law, maintaining data integrity and security, and protecting intelligence sources, methods, activities, and sensitive law enforcement information.

Policy Coordination

(13) The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, in coordination with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall be responsible for interagency policy coordination on all aspects of this directive.

Roles and Responsibilities

(14) Agencies shall undertake the roles and responsibilities herein to the fullest extent permitted by law, consistent with the policy of this directive, including appropriate safeguards for information privacy and other legal rights, and in consultation with State, local, and tribal authorities, where appropriate.

(15) The Attorney General shall:

(a) Provide legal policy guidance, in coordination with the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), regarding the lawful collection, use, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information to enhance national security; and

(b) In coordination with the DNI, ensure that policies and procedures for the consolidated terrorist watchlist maximize the use of all biometric identifiers.

(16) Each of the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the DNI, and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall:

(a) Develop and implement mutually compatible guidelines for each respective agency for the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information, to the fullest extent practicable, lawful, and necessary to protect national security;

(b) Maintain and enhance interoperability among agency biometric and associated biographic systems, by utilizing common information technology and data standards, protocols, and interfaces;

(c) Ensure compliance with laws, policies, and procedures respecting information privacy, other legal rights, and information security;

(d) Establish objectives, priorities, and guidance to ensure timely and effective tasking, collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information among authorized agencies;

(e) Program for and budget sufficient resources to support the development, operation, maintenance, and upgrade of biometric capabilities consistent with this directive and with such instructions as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget may provide; and

(f) Ensure that biometric and associated biographic and contextual information on KSTs is provided to the National Counterterrorism Center and, as appropriate, to the Terrorist Screening Center.

(17) The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the DNI, shall coordinate the sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information with foreign partners in accordance with applicable law, including international obligations undertaken by the United States.

(18) The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, through the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), shall coordinate executive branch biometric science and technology policy, including biometric standards and necessary research, development, and conformance testing programs. Recommended executive branch biometric standards
are contained in the Registry of United States Government

Recommended Biometric Standards and shall be updated via the NSTC Subcommittee on Biometrics and Identity Management.

Implementation

(19) Within 90 days of the date of this directive, the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security, the DNI, and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, submit for the President’s approval an action plan to implement this directive. The action plan shall do the following:

(a) Recommend actions and associated timelines for enhancing the existing terrorist-oriented identification and screening processes by expanding the use of biometrics;

(b) Consistent with applicable law, (i) recommend categories of individuals in addition to KSTs who may pose a threat to national security, and (ii) set forth cost-effective actions and associated timelines for expanding the collection and use of biometrics to identify and screen for such individuals; and

(c) Identify business processes, technological capabilities, legal authorities, and research and development efforts needed to implement this directive.

(20) Within 1 year of the date of this directive, the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security, the DNI, and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, a report on the implementation of this directive and the associated action plan, proposing any necessary additional steps for carrying out the policy of this directive. Agencies shall provide support for, and promptly respond to, requests made by the Attorney General in furtherance of this report. The Attorney General will thereafter report to the President on the implementation of this directive as the Attorney General deems necessary or when directed by the President.

General Provisions

(21) This directive:

(a) shall be implemented consistent with applicable law, including international obligations undertaken by the United States, and the authorities of agencies, or heads of such agencies, vested by law;

(b) shall not be construed to alter, amend, or revoke any other NSPD or HSPD in effect on the effective date of this directive;

(c) is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable by law or in equity by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

GEORGE W. BUSH

Bush criminalizes anti-war movement and humanitarian aid

November 8, 2008

martijo Uncategorized bush, criminals, Executive Orders, Iraq, Marti Oakley, natioanl emergency, national security, property theft, Secretary of the Treasury 1 Comment

This is only one of the Executive Orders issued by a tyrant; a man totally dedicated to eradication of the Constitution, civil liberties and inalienable rights.

What you can read in this Order are the words of man terrified of his own people; one who seeks to silence them. Notorious for his own criminal activities, threatened by possible prosecution for crimes against humanity, Bush has effectively rendered dissent against government actions as criminal. This Executive Order is written to be intentionally and broadly interpreted. On its face it appears to criminalize persons who might be actively involved in supporting Iraq either physically or monetarily against the United States. This can even include those (religious groups?) who might try to give humanitarian aid.

As in almost all of Bush’s E.O.’s, he grants himself the power at will to be the single or unilateral “decider” of who is or is not one of this newly created class of criminals.

Its an odd turn of events when the most corrupt and criminal among us abuses its power and authority to criminalize Constitutional rights.

July 17, 2007

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,

(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:

(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or

(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.

Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.

Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 17, 2007.

Water Restoration Act is anything But…

April 11, 2008

ppjg Constitution, fluoride/water, Government commodity, controlling water, corporate control, federal land grab, Feingold, national security, Oberstar, privatizing water, Public Trust Doctrine, Survival, water as weapon, water quality, water seizure, water theft 2 Comments

The Water Restoration Act of 2007, brought to you by Jim Oberstar of Minnesota, along with others, gives the federal government complete control over every waterway, river, stream, lake, aquifer, creek, slew, swamp, underground spring and even the rain that runs off your roof. Why? Well to better protect you from polluters and to ensure water safety, and of course “national security”.

Here’s the real deal. Oil which has been deemed the worlds most valuable commodity (remember that word) is quickly being replaced by water. Water is the new “gold”. Under the Public Trust doctrine, the government is prohibited from converting something such as water (a human right…we can’t live without it) to a commodity. It must remain in a public trust, meaning that it is so important to our survival that it should never be subjected to markets, trading or private interests. In other words, it should never be reclassified as a commodity. But this Act lays the groundwork for removing from the Public Trust this basic human right which is a necessity, and will facilitate it being reclassified a “needed commodity”. Enter the multi-national corporations.

What is under way is the effort to classify water as a commodity and not a right. All of this actually started with NAFTA and then CAFTA. Both agreements, which are not enforceable as they are both unconstitutional have been parts of a puzzle that until recently seemed not to make any sense at all. Both are focused on giving multinational corporations the right to lay claim to food production whether it is agriculture or animal ranching, to force out family farms, to patent their new “frankenseeds” and put the resulting GMO food on our grocery shelves without labeling the foods as altered.

The corporations can now sue the government (and have) if it acts in any way to prevent it from making profits it believes it is entitled to. This ability to sue for impaired profit making can be the result of environmental regulations, of Federal laws which may prevent the corporations from hiring illegal workers, or issues of eminent domain in which an individuals’ land stands in the way of corporate profiteering and the courts have not acted to protect the interests of the corporation. The corporation then claims “trade illegal” provisions of NAFTA and CAFTA and our federal laws and regulations are put aside, along with property rights.

All that was left to capture from the public was the water supply. CAFTA goes a long way in establishing the privatization of water supplies, including in-land navigated waters and the right to use and access the water supplies.

If the federal government is not able to gain total control of all water from whatever source, it is highly unlikely that water can be taken from the status of Public Trust and moved to one of a commodity, which is exactly what the Water Restoration Act of 2007 will enable.

If CAFTA protections and provisions for corporations and the provisions within CAFTA that put the rights of investors above those of the individual, or human rights, cannot come into play, it will be nearly impossible to expose our water supply to global markets. CAFTA’s primary aim is to protect and promote investors regardless of the cost to individuals or communities.

Water is not only a basic human right, but also a natural resource. Inland states like Minnesota have Public Trust Laws (in addition to federal doctrine) which maintain the use of waterways for drinking and for recreation purposes. Every lake here has public water access due to the Public Trust which everyone contributes to in one way or another. No one can claim land at the bottom of a lake……its commonly held. No one can claim private ownership of lake fish stocks, or other natural resources resulting from the lake’s existence. This applies to rivers also, including the Mississippi which runs through the state.

The Water Restoration Act of 2007 would federalize all inland and coastal waters from any source. This act is needed to set the stage for the privatization guaranteed to corporations under CAFTA and would effectively convert the entire water supply from any source into a commodity.

As it is, any corporate agriculture business operating in any area is allowed to bypass water treatment plants, sewage treatment and the associated costs and to tap directly into underground aquifers even at the cost of depleting the water supply to the surrounding communities. GMO seeds, especially “traitor” seeds require as much as three times the normal amount of water to activate and to grow, but any efforts to limit use or regulate disposal even by monetary assessment have been unsuccessful. The corporate rights now exceed that of the individual or community. CAFTA clearly states repeatedly that “investor protections” must be a priority.

Using the NAFTA provisions, along with even more detrimental CAFTA provisions, the World Bank along with the United Nations are active in the effort to convert the worlds’ water supply into a commodity to be controlled by private investors via global trade and investment agreements. If these efforts are successful, water will no longer be a community or individual right and resource necessary to maintain life, but a globally traded commodity subject to markets and your ability to pay.

The World Trade organization in collusion with provisions of NAFTA, have been instrumental in converting water into a tradable commodity and as such subject to international trade policies which favor no one but the giant corporations. In each instance of corporations attempting to overturn domestic environmental laws or regulations, the laws have been rendered null using the “trade illegal” provisions of both NAFTA and CAFTA which declare that the right of the corporation cannot be superseded or infringed upon by laws or regulations that hinder the amount of profit they estimate can be attained.

The World Bank already has established a system whereby credit or loans will not be issued to Third World countries and even less stressed countries, unless they agree to allow foreign investors access to privatize the water supply. In Bolivia this resulted in mass demonstrations that finally forced out a subsidiary of Bechtel that had privatized the water supply, increased costs three-fold minimally, dispensed with upkeep and left ¼ of the rural homes without access to water.

England has privatized their water system and costs rose 45% overnight, all but skeleton crews remained of the maintenance sector and the quality of water has dropped significantly.

In one Canadian town several people became ill and one died from an ecoli contamination in the water supply. This occurred after the supply had been privatized, and the owner of the water supply knew of the contamination. The public was never notified until after people became ill.

In March of 2000 at the Hague, a meeting occurred where water executives stated that as long as water was coming out of the tap the public had no right to any information as to how it got there….. Or its quality.

Ministerial Declaration of The Hague on Water Security in the 21st Century…

www.waternunc.com/gb/secwwf12.htm

GWP – Library

Here in the States, private investors have in some places succeeded in taking over community water supplies, in other places the communities have fought back against the sale of publicly held supplies realizing that this most important element of human survival should never be under the control of private corporations whose one and only duty is to make a profit for investors.

As water has historically been deemed a human right and necessity, so much so that the Public Trust Doctrine was put on paper, how could anyone in good conscience believe water is, or promote water as, a tradable commodity? How can there be so many callous and greedy individuals running around out there who would willingly see another human thirst to death just so they can make a buck? Apparently there are many.

The Water Restoration Act 2007 relies heavily on promotion based on protecting the water supply from pollution, from terrorists, and of course “national security”. The truth is it has nothing to do with any of these things. The WRA will allow unfettered pollution with no recourse for communities or individuals and “trade illegal” treatment of local and state laws. Before the entire water supply can be sold off to private interests the federal government must gain control of the entire water system. This is what the WRA will do.

This Act would be more aptly titled “The Water Confiscation Act” as this is exactly what is intended. All it is set to do is to strike down the Public Trust Doctrine and facilitate the conversion of water from a basic human right into a commodity. The only threat to “national security” here is from the government and the massive corporations who are behind it.

I guess we shouldn’t be surprised by any of this. After all, the Security & Prosperity Partnership refers to people as “human capital”. I wonder how long it will be before they refer to us as a “needed commodity” and trade and sell us on the global market.

Control the food, control the water and you control the people. I believe it was Henry Kissinger who first made this observation when speaking about the importance of depopulation through the use of eugenics. Obviously good old Henry realized that overtaking the food and water supplies would go a long way in deciding who had a right to life.

Maude Barlow wrote a detailed book about the coming water crisis called:

Blue Gold: The Global Water Crisis and the Commodification of the World’s Water Supply

http://www.canadians.org/about/Maude_Barlow/Blue_Covenant/index.html

Although written in 1999, it is so relevant today that Ms. Barlow will be on tour during 2008 speaking about this and other issues.

End Run Around REAL ID

April 9, 2008

ppjg REAL ID, S&PP/NAU, Uncategorized databases, HR 5405, national security, New World Order, REAL ID, secure card, Social Security ID, tracking, unconstitutional Leave a comment

URGENT ACTION ALERT –

STOP H.R. 5405

I regretfully send you this email to inform you of yet another plot to enslave the American people in an unconstitutional framework of databases under the guise of “security”.

Recently Congressman Mark Kirk from Illinois 10th District introduced a bill to create a “Secure Social Security Card”. This new card is clearly a run around to the state’s opposition to Real ID andwe must do all in our power to prevent it from becoming law.

FIRST: Watch this short video recorded at the town hall meeting where Congressman Kirk talks about the “Secure Social Security Card”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrsJVZe41Dg

SECOND: Review and comment on the in depth article about it here:

http://www.restoretherepublic.com/content/view/627/71/

THIRD: Contact your congressman and instruct them to vote against HR 5405:

https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

FORTH: Post this email on your blog, post it in forums, forward it to every member in your address book.

FIFTH: Track the status of HR 5405 at

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5405

Unlike Real ID where the States can rise up and fight it independently, the “Secure Social Security Card” must be fought at the federal level by contacting our members of congress.

This is another attempt at connecting the American people into the international databases of the New World Order. They are failing with Real ID and are attempting to use the SS card as the bridge. They will only succeed if we let them and you needto take the steps help us defeat this plan before it takes root.

Listening to the footsteps of the revolution,

Gary Franchi

National Director

RestoreTheRepublic.com

rtr@restoretherepublic.com

www.RestoreTheRepublic.com

3149 Dundee Rd #176,

Northbrook, Illinois 60062,

OPT out of REAL ID

March 10, 2008

ppjg Articles, REAL ID data mining, national security, no-fly, personal information, REAL ID, repeal REAL ID Leave a comment

I cannot begin to tell you how concerned I am at this overreaching on the part of our Government. It is as if there were no Bill of Rights, indeed, no Constitution at all.

OPT MINNESOTA OUT OF THE FEDERAL REAL ID ACT SCHEDULED TO GO INTO EFFECT IN 2009. MN NEEDS TO JOIN MONTANA, SOUTH CAROLINA, MAINE, GEORGIA, AND POSSIBLY NEW HAMPSHIRE IN OPPOSING THIS LAW. OUR BASIC FREEDOM IS AT STAKE!!

The Real ID act requires all states to establish a federally directed driver’s license to include a laundry list of personal information in electronic form that will be shared across states. Without the license, there will be no driving, no entry to public buildings, no flying – nothing the federal government cannot control.

The REAL ID act IS the monitoring of all US citizens creating a massive database of information on every citizen. It has NOTHING to do with national security – (the new catch phrase used to cover every act the government implements to take away our rights) – it has everything to do with the illegal data mining done on legal, law-abiding citizens. If national security were the real issue, our southern border would have been secured long ago.

By its own admission, the government can now spy on us online without us even knowing they are there, open and read our mail, enter our homes without a warrant, search and obtain records on medical, financial, employment, and even the books we check out from the library. But now, suddenly, they can’t know who we are unless we subject ourselves to the REAL ID. And WE can’t board a plane, get on a train, enter a Federal building, or even obtain our Social Security unless we submit to this invasion? Please do what you can to stop the REAL ID travesty of “homeland security.”

Sincerely,

Dan…..from Minnesota

When did we become the enemy?

March 2, 2008

ppjg FEMA, Government 911, Canadian military, Civil Assistance plan, domestic terrorist, due prcoess, habeas corpus, Infragard, national security Leave a comment

After watching the avalanche of infringements on our civil liberties since 9/11 I can only conclude that it is American citizens who have become a threat to “national security”. It is also apparent to me that what you or I think of as national security is not quite the same thing as the government’s perceptions.

Through the Military Commissions Act we lost the writ of habeas corpus…the right to due process and to know what we are charged with and the right to mount a defense. Now, just voicing an opposition to government policies can get you labeled as a “domestic terrorist”.

The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 reinforced this loss of due process and gave the president the right to deem any one of us as domestic combatants, solely on his deciding that we are. It also gave him the right to put our National Guards and Reserves under federal military control to use against us should he decide to.These two pieces in particular gutted the Posse Commitatus Act that forbid the use of any standing army of the United States to be used against the citizens.

And just this last week, General Renaurt AF, signed the Civil Assistance Plan with Canada that will allow the Canadian Military to be used against us on our own soil. We have similar agreements with Mexico and Germany among others. This assistance is needed in case we have a forest fire, earthquake, terrorist attack…..or civil revolt.

The “Anti Terrorism and Homegrown Radicalization Act” S 1959 will make it an act of force and/or violence to rally, protest, or to gather in any way to try and change social, religious or political views. To do so would mean that you are now a “radical”. In the center of this unconstitutional bill is the groundwork for closing down entire sections of the internet. Supposedly, we are so stupid and gullible that we are being exposed to extremist propaganda on the net every day and we need to be protected from that. As a person who spends hours every day on the net researching legislation among other things, and have done so for years, I have never once seen or been exposed to any propaganda from any extremists other than those in our own government.

Homeland Security now has the Infragard….a coalition of about 23,000 individuals from the business sector who have been deputized to “defend the infrastructure in their area”, and have the right to shoot to kill without fear of prosecution when (not if) martial law is declared.

Infragard works directly with the FBI and reports “suspicious” activities by employees, neighbors, and others. And they are armed.The FBI is building a database that now includes about 60 million people, and intends to continue doing this with an end objective of about 20 billion individual files. They also have a watch list data base with an estimated 300 thousand names on it of possible “suspects”.

Obama’s “Global Poverty Tax” bill is on the floor of the senate now. It allows the United Nations to assess a tax of .07% on our GDP…amounting to billions and billions of dollars to be taken from US taxpayers supposedly to fight poverty in third world countries. Hidden in this piece of work is the intention to ban small arms….including hunting rifles and shotguns. It would also make US citizens subject to international law, rather than our own courts.

Even though this is a limited list of assaults on our liberty, does anyone see anything here that would have any affect on stopping terrorism? Not one of these bills or agreements deals with anything other than stripping US citizens of their rights, and establishing a police state. So who are these people that our government is so fearful of? George Bush claimed at one time that he had looked the enemy in the eye……and apparently he was looking at us.

You Still Don’t Get It…….

February 22, 2008

ppjg Articles, REAL ID coercion, force, foreclosure, GPS, INTERNET, national security, newborns, political, REAL ID, S 1959, Secure Flight, social, violence 1 Comment

I’ve come to the conclusion that we really do need to throw the bums out! It won’t be too difficult on the Republican side…..21 representatives and senators have resigned or are not seeking re-election in ’08. More are expected. If I was them, I would take off running too. All the damage done to the country is about to come crashing down on us and these participants in the destruction want to get safely away before the real state of the union is revealed.

The Democrats have simply blown off the will of the American people and have decided that there will be no fence, no immigration enforcement, no repealing of the Patriot Acts, the Military Commissions Acts, the NSA spying bill, power grabbing Executive Orders or Presidential Directives that give the executive dictatorial powers……..no….and impeachment is off the table too! Never mind that our Constitution and Bill of Rights has been trashed……..lets talk about national healthcare.

And God knows on both sides they are tough(er) on national security. We now have to get clearance from DHS under Secure Flight to board a plane or train just to prove we are not criminals or terrorists. A boarding pass will now only be issued after clearance from DHS. And if they deny clearance; then what? Then nothing.

DHS can deny you clearance for any number of reasons, but you’ll never know what they are…..it’s a secret. You can’t defend yourself from their reasons…….because it’s a secret. You can’t sue, defend, or in any way obtain any information that the decision to deem you a “threat” was based on. It’s all a big secret…..and the information can never be removed from your dossier that they have built on you and add to daily.

The FBI is building a data base that now includes, dossiers on about 60 million people…..and intend to continue doing so. They have no idea and do not care whether the information they collect is accurate or true.

We are fingerprinted, iris scanned, facially imprinted, data mined, filmed, tracked by our cell phones, on our computers, through GPS installed in our cars and phones so they know who and where we are, and now they want a REALID chip implanted not only in us but in all newborn babies so they can track them for life.

Under the proposed S. 1959 Anti-Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorist Act, we could no longer legally assemble, rally, protest or contact our representatives because that could be considered using “force” especially if we are advocating for social or political change.

But the real intent is to close off whole sections of the internet limiting access to information your government doesn’t want you to have and halting the communication between grassroots coalitions and stopping the hemorrhaging of information about the illegal and unconstitutional activities of our government and its agents and operatives.

S 1959 does not define what “coercion, violence or force” would consist of. In fact, the bill is so loosely worded that simply writing this article could be defined as an act of “coercion” because I am trying to “force” you (by writing) to advocate for rejection of this bill. By force I mean; write your Senators, representatives, your mayors, governors, whoever, wherever and state your objections! This is the last volley in an attempt to render null, the 1st Amendment.

Every issue addressed in this bill is already covered by multiple laws. What this bill does do, is resurrect COINTELPRO and take it to an even further extreme and its intent is to destroy the open communication on the net. That is the real intent of this bill.

While all this goes on, millions cross our Southern border. We don’t know who they are, where they have come from or intend to go. We do know that 7,000 Afghani’s, 14,000 Chinese, and about 20 million Hispanics are here illegally. But instead of getting tough on national security like they claim our government on both sides hands them free food, education, medical treatment, fuel assistance, housing and now intends to let them access our Social Security system. All this while middle class American’s lose their homes to foreclosure and their jobs to overseas markets.

The fact is we have no national security. Our country has been compromised on every level and at every opportunity. Looking back at the laws and executive orders passed over the last seven years, it would appear that the terrorists the US government and its minions fear the most are the legal citizens of this country.

Marti Oakley

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

But what happens to that whistleblower who stepped forward and did the right thing?

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

The “Fast and Furious” debacle is a perfect example.

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Rethinking us More

Share this:

Like this:

We are supposed to have a Republic. Of course we are supposed to be free, also.

The national security shell game

Share this:

Like this:

You can’t defend freedom by eliminating freedom, or by terrorizing your own country.

Share this:

Like this:

You won’t hear anyone say the word, war.

IF I understand this correctly, gassing people is a big problem, but blowing them up along with their entire community so that you can overthrow their government and seize their national assets, is not. More

Share this:

Like this:

Sir Mervyn King Thinks He

Sees a Financial Crisis

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Reprinted with permission from the author.

What the Police Won’t Apologize For

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

www.waternunc.com/gb/secwwf12.htm

Share this: