Home

Massachusetts Bill H3027….Objective? To cloak financial exploitation of the elderly

15 Comments

Marti Oakley

Comment:  If ever there was a valid reason for disbarring the BAR, making it unlawful for individuals in this closed union to assemble or to attempt to influence laws affecting the public, Massachusetts H 3027 surely has to be one of those reasons. MJO

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Note to Mr. Harshbarger: What exactly is “ordinary negligence?”

The first thing we need to clarify is that probate tribunals (and these are tribunals) operate only under a intentionally constructed system of statutes, rules and regulations that exist only to avoid the common law and access to courts of law. You cannot use the Constitutions, neither state or federal to defend yourself from the predatory activities of these tribunals and the predators who access them for the specific purpose of exploitation and self-enrichment. You have no rights in these tribunals. You have no protections.

Gloucester Times

Harshbarger on Monday asked the Judiciary Committee to throw its support behind a bill that would establish a state office of adult guardianship as a public-private partnership that would handle the appointment of guardians for adults who cannot make their own legal decisions and lack family, friends or access to volunteers who could step into the role.”

At issue is the bill H 3027 currently in the Massachusetts Judiciary Committee. What is clearly a bill meant to legitimize and provide immunity for the predators in the guardianship-for-profit system, the former AG of Massachusetts, Mr. Harshbarger, now newly installed with the Boston lawfirm of Casner & Edwards, is hawking this bill which has no other purpose than to provide protection to the predators.

The first question we all need to ask is:

Who comprises the private part of this so-called “public/private partnership” (ppp)? And why would they be willing to fund a public agency that will supposedly only cost the state about $400 thousand a year to operate?

Sounds tantalizing doesn’t it?! Doesn’t it just give you the warm fuzzies to think there are actually individuals out there who are so altruistic, so philanthropic, that they would fund a public agency dedicated to protecting vulnerable people while saving the state a bucket of money at the same time!! Does it get any better than this? Apparently it does if you are part of the system!

Not so fast.

From Section 3 (c) in the bill: More

Dr. Bharani: Four Years of Persecution by Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine

Leave a comment

new logoDoug Kinan

(See CHAPTER ONE: “A MEDICARE FRAUD STORY (ONE DOCTOR’S FIGHT FOR YOUR LIFE”).

______________________________________________________________________

CHAPTER TWO

This is another chapter regarding the story about Dr. Bharani Padmanabhan (Dr. Bharani) who is in his fourth year of being persecuted by the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine for conscientiously complying with the rules, the law, his oath as a doctor and for his opposition to Medicare fraud.

Despite the fact that the Massachusetts Attorney General has a dedicated office to combat insurance fraud, the AG’s office has filed court pleadings asking the court to dismiss Dr. Bharani’s complaint on the grounds that the alleged criminal violations Dr Bharani opposed (retaliation, felony perjury, Medicare fraud and more) are immune from prosecution.

Maura Healey Board motion declaring immunity (2)

barry levin NKDA 4 pages (2)

When the top law enforcement official in Massachusetts asks a court of law to go along with criminal activity, at the very least it’s a bad faith admission that a crime has been committed. Is any court of law in America the appropriate forum to force anyone to be silent about crime or else? Is this due process?
According to the American Medical Association “there are 920,000 physicians in the US. This is a ratio of 10 nurses to 3 physicians.”

Thus, there are approximately 4 million licensed medical professionals working in hospitals, clinics and other medical care facilities in America.

One of the most important pieces of basic medical information needed to know, (not “nice to know”), for proper patient care is whether or not any patient has any drug allergies which could severely complicate medical care and treatment and in some cases result in death.
Meet “NKDA” which means “No Known Drug Allergies” and is present on every patient’s medical chart and in their medical record for medical staff to see upon interviewing and/or meeting their patient at bedside.

“NKDA” is a critical piece of information which allows medical personnel to be able to respond to health situations and treatments calmly and proactively, and to be able to promptly avoid medical complications by inadvertently prescribing the wrong drug. For any doctor or nurse to admit not knowing what NKDA means is similar to not knowing their own name.

Accordingly, the “expert” witness who testified under oath (see attached transcript) against Dr. Bharani indicates that the odds are 4 million to one that this “expert” witness may be the only one in the entire doctor/nurse medical community in the United States that is unsure or does not know what “NKDA” means. How can this be possible and what are the implications of a medical doctor with approximately 37 years of experience not knowing what NKDA means?

After reading the transcript testimony of a doctor who now works in a teaching hospital and admits to being unaware of critical medical knowledge, perhaps the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine should change their focus?

A MEDICARE FRAUD STORY (ONE DOCTOR’S FIGHT FOR YOUR LIFE)‏

2 Comments

new-logo25By Douglas K. Kinan

                Updated to include documents.
____________________________________________

“For decades we have listened to FBI and DOJ pronouncements such as, “If you see something, say something,” “no one is above the law,” “equal justice under the law”, all Americans are entitled to “due process” and the all elusive “rule of law” claim, which oftentimes is manipulated by administrative and legal jujitsu.”___________________

the REAL termination letter

MemorandumW-AcousticallyAnnotatedTranscript

PAIKOS MOTION TO DISMISS – MEMORANDUM

the FRAUDULENT Termination Letter from CHA Nov11

 letter AG coakley may 2013 v2 2      signed receipts coakley

America is now at a stage where public corruption has reached pandemic proportions and, in my view, is the new normal in the court system and in America.

However, the general category of “public corruption” is too kind and discounts the fact that it’s really about the people who are corrupt, for motives that are truly bizarre. The collective propensity to knowingly break the law, abuse their power to harm innocent people, make a few bucks and/or ingratiate themselves with like-minded individuals is remarkable. Bad acts and law breaking can be covered up for a while, but they don’t go away.

Most Americans believe the court system is supposed to be the last line of defense to “serve and protect” the people. Most people also believe that they have a right to report crime with the expectation that an objective investigation will occur. However, when the court system is used to complete crime and cover up fraud, waste and abuse, it’s a sure sign that things are backward. Media silence only makes it worse.

Witness the case of Dr. Bharani Padmanabhan (“Dr. Bharani”).

Dr. Bharani was a Staff Neurologist at the Cambridge Health Alliance (“CHA”) from July 2007 to November 2010.

Without any hint of embellishment, Dr. Bharani’s humanitarianism with regard to his patients and with risk to his own self-interest, exposed patient neglect and Medicare fraud within the hospital in which he worked.

Dr. Bharani is one (1) of less than fifty (50) Neurologists in the world with 2 fellowships and a PhD in Multiple Sclerosis (“MS”). His patients will tell you that his credentials, ability, integrity and character are impeccable.

Dr. Bharani single-handedly cared for 750 MS patients who are extremely pleased with his care. Despite all of what Dr. Bharani has continued to endure, he still maintains a case load of 50 patients and sees them for free because, he said, “they are my responsibility.” MS patients cannot afford to pay him out of pocket. Dr. Bharani’s medical posture is clear: “Poor patients are welcome.”

On November 11, 2010, at approximately 3:30 pm, Dr. Bharani was paid a surprise visit by the Chief Administrative Officer, the Neurology Division Chief and a hospital Security Guard and escorted out of the hospital. This surprise visit only allowed Dr. Bharani to take with him a reflex hammer that his father gave him when he was 17. More

Massachusettes:”Contractual Sickness Industry Disease Management”

2 Comments

Submitted by:  Annonymous

__________________________________________

While the Republicans continue their state-by-state assault on alternative healthcare, Massachusettes has begun fining business owners who hire teenagers for NOT insuring them through their businesses.  These  kids are all insured by their parents and even if the owner were to insure them, only the parents policy would cover claims. 

_______________________________________

“April 11, 2011

A local fast food employer, employing 45-15 and 16 year old’s who already have health insurance through individual family plans is being fined by the state of Massachusetts. The fine is for not insuring them through his business.

The penalty was $5700.00, roughly, which came after his last appeal failed. The owner is now looking for an outlet to expose the burden of mandated health care. He is willing to speak to anyone who his the means to further publicize his story.

He presented his case live today, April 11, 2011 on the Ed Lambert morning talk show on WXTK, 95.1 FM radio out of Barnstable, Massachusetts. The owner identified himself as Tom, owner of the Kool-Kone located at 374 Marion Road, Wareham, Massachusetts, phone # 508-295-6638.”

As a side note it was told to me from a trusted source that this fine could have been worse. Well, right, that is one way to spin it. Then they asked if the owner had thought of hiring those over 65.
More

Massachusetts SJC rules 2nd Amendment does not apply to states

Leave a comment

bfraga@s-t.com
March 11, 2010 12:00 AM
The right to bear arms as defined in the Second Amendment does not apply to the states, so Massachusetts can regulate who can have firearms and how those weapons are to be stored, the state’s high court ruled Wednesday.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court unanimously dismissed two challenges to the state’s gun laws that require citizens to register with police departments before acquiring a firearm, as well as keeping guns stored in a locked container or equipped with a trigger lock.

The court upheld the conviction of Nathaniel DePina, a New Bedford man who is serving a two-year jail sentence for carrying an illegal firearm. His lawyer, Paul Patten of Fall River, challenged the conviction on the grounds that the state’s gun licensing laws were unconstitutional. More

%d bloggers like this: