Home

Mask Advice from The Good Fairy

May 26, 2021

ppjg 1st Amendment, Constitution, families, Government, HEALTH, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , 1 Comment

May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'YOU'VE HAD THE POWER TO TAKE THAT MASK OFF AND GO OUTSIDE ALL ALONG MY DEAR'

Covid-19: The Ridiculousness of the Official Narrative

October 6, 2020

ppjg COVID, families, HEALTH, no fake news, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

NoFakeNews

 

By Dr. John Reizer

On Sunday, October 4th, I forced myself to briefly watch the mainstream news coverage about the fake virus and the POTUS riding around in an armored SUV, wearing a face mask, and waving to supporters.

There were approximately ten medical geniuses, adorned in white doctors’ costumes reporting to the hypnotized audience about the POTUS’s progress.

The geniuses debated amongst themselves why The First Patient had had a low oxygen saturation level on a couple of occasions since he was hospitalized.

Perhaps, if the POTUS didn’t have a giant mask strapped to his face, he would have been able to receive the proper amount of oxygen his body required. (emphasis mine)

The experimental drugs the white coats are giving the POTUS are extremely toxic and dangerous. If he’s really receiving these products, his life may be in jeopardy.

According to the latest reports, the commander-in-chief could be heading back to the White House on Monday. Is he going to self-isolate and quarantine for 14 days like everyone else in the world after testing false-positive?

The NFL postponed a game yesterday because of several players testing positive. The game has been rescheduled for Monday, one day later? How can the deadly and contagious Covid-19 virus be mitigated so effectively in only 24 hours? It was a dire enough situation to postpone the contest on Sunday, but it’s okay to play the game at the same venue one day later? Come on, directors of the plandemic, get the plot flaws out of your script.

The official covid-19 narrative is filled with ridiculous concepts that make little or no sense. We have been lied to about an alleged virus that is as fake as Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny for ten months.

Why aren’t more people protesting against the ridiculousness taking place?

More

Mask Bacteria: You are making yourself sick

September 24, 2020

ppjg COVID, government sponsored terrorism, HEALTH, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , , 2 Comments

John Rappoport nails it! The Covid weapon against the elderly

September 9, 2020

ppjg COVID, families, HEALTH , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 Comment

by Jon Rappoport

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“HAVE YOU READ THE RESULTS OF A NEW YORK STUDY REVEALING PATIENTS OVER THE AGE OF 65 WHO ARE PUT ON VENTILATORS DIE AT THE STAGGERING RATE OF 97.2 PERCENT?

But they just keep on pushing ventilators.

COVID is old people.

Period.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

September 8, 2020

Scott,

Where to begin? No new virus was ever shown to exist via proper proof. Worthless diagnostic test. Sixteen ways case and death numbers are being faked. If there were a virus, the only way to stop it would be through open massive public exposure and the gaining of natural immunity. Therefore, no lockdowns, no masks, no distancing, no vast economic destruction under the watch of a president whose whole program was based on expanding the economy.

That enough for starters?

I’d really like to know what went on the room, back in March, when Fauci walked in with Neil Ferguson’s preposterous computer predictions of COVID deaths in the US and spoke with Trump.

Did no one bring up the fact that Ferguson’s whole career has been a string of failed predictions? Was there zero due diligence? Did some economic advisor open his mouth and tell the president what a long-term lockdown would do to the economy? Fifty million people unemployed? Well over a million businesses destroyed?

I hope you understand that Moderna is Fauci’s favorite vaccine company, and his agency, NIAID, stands to rake in cash if Moderna’s shot turns out to be the choice for COVID—WHEN, IN FACT, NO VACCINE IS NECESSARY.

I hope you know Moderna is a little punk firm that has never brought a product of any kind to market, and yet garnered $500 million in fed funds to research a vaccine. How’d that happen?

On top of that, Moderna is deploying RNA technology, which has never been approved for ANY pharmaceutical product, and has caused, in trials, serious adverse effects.

Are you aware the NY Times recently reported on a large study showing up to 90 PERCENT OF ALL US COVID CASES HAVE BEEN FALSE POSITIVES, OWING TO THE EXTREME SENSITIVITY OF THE PCR TEST? Not enough virus present in humans to harm a flea.

And forget about contagion.

More

Potential Harms and Risks of Mask Wearing Part 3

August 4, 2020

ppjg COVID, families, HEALTH, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , , , , , , 1 Comment

National Addiction News

 

The WHO also lists a number of potential harms and risks of mask wearing, which “should be carefully taken into account when adopting this approach of targeted continuous medical mask use.” These include:14

  • Self-contamination due to the manipulation of the mask by contaminated hands or not changing the mask when wet, soiled or damaged
  • General discomfort, as well as facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis or worsening acne
  • False sense of security that may reduce adherence to other well recognized preventive measures such as hand hygiene
  • Disadvantages for or difficulty wearing them by specific vulnerable populations such as those with mental health disorders, developmental disabilities, the deaf and hard of hearing community, and children
  • Difficulty wearing them in hot and humid environments

Aside from these, several people have demonstrated that masks can rapidly result in the buildup of toxic carbon dioxide, which can have a markedly detrimental impact on health.

In one video, a science teacher tried to evade YouTube censorship by saying children should wear face masks to school — all while holding up handwritten signs informing viewers the tactic was for censorship evasion, and to pay attention to the carbon dioxide metering results, which show carbon dioxide levels behind the mask shoot up above 10,000 parts per million (ppm) after just 10 breaths.

After garnering several hundred thousand views, the video was removed for “violating YouTube community guidelines.”

Del Bigtree of The Highwire has performed an identical demonstration15 (see bitchute video below). With an N95 mask on, the carbon dioxide level spikes above 8,480 ppm within seconds. Above 5,000 ppm, OSHA warns that “toxicity or oxygen deprivation could occur.”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/ypLjmXQoLygi/

Carbon dioxide levels between 2,000 ppm and 5,000 ppm are associated with headaches, sleepiness, poor concentration, loss of attention, increased heart rate and slight nausea. The maximum permissible daily exposure limit is 5,000 ppm.

Wearing a standard surgical mask, carbon dioxide levels again reached above 8,000 ppm, although it took longer. Shockingly, wearing a cloth bandana resulted in carbon dioxide buildup near the nose and mouth exceeding 8,000 ppm.

Even wearing a clear plastic face shield (without a mask) resulted in carbon dioxide levels in the 1,500-ppm range, which is associated with drowsiness and poor air quality. The video at the top of this section also addresses many of the potential harms and risks of masks wearing.

Toxic ingredients that can worsen breathing problems are yet another potential hazard of certain masks. For example, surgical masks are made of plastics like polypropylene, a known asthma trigger.16

The 2018 study,17,18 “Hypoxia Downregulates Protein S Expression,” also describes how hypoxia (low oxygen concentration) increases your risk of blood clots by reducing protein S, which is a natural anticoagulant. Wearing a mask, especially for long periods of time, may reduce your oxygen concentration, and considering COVID-19 is already associated with abnormal blood clotting, inducing hypoxia may be ill advised.

PPE Waste Is Becoming an Environmental Hazard

Last but not least, environmentalists are now warning that personal protective equipment (PPE) such as medical face masks may turn into a devastating environmental problem. As reported by The Guardian, June 8, 2020:19

“The French non-profit Opération Mer Propre, whose activities include regularly picking up litter along the Côte d’Azur, began sounding the alarm late last month.

Divers had found what Joffrey Peltier of the organization described as ‘COVID waste’ — dozens of gloves, masks and bottles of hand sanitizer beneath the waves of the Mediterranean, mixed in with the usual litter of disposable cups and aluminum cans … ‘It’s the promise of pollution to come if nothing is done,’ said Peltier.

In France alone, authorities have ordered two billion disposable masks, said Laurent Lombard of Opération Mer Propre. ‘Knowing that … soon we’ll run the risk of having more masks than jellyfish in the Mediterranean,’ he wrote on social media alongside video of a dive showing algae-entangled masks and soiled gloves in the sea near Antibes.

CDC Policy Review Found No Evidence of Usefulness Either Part 2

August 4, 2020

ppjg COVID, families, HEALTH, martial law, Police State, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

National Addiction News

A policy review paper9 published in Emerging Infectious Diseases in May 2020 — the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s own journal — has also reviewed “the evidence base on the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical personal protective measures … in non-healthcare settings,” and they too found no evidence of benefit:

“Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Pages 970 to 972 of the review include the following quotes:10

“In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs [randomized controlled trials] that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks …

Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids …

There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure.

Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza … In this review, we did not find evidence to support a protective effect of personal protective measures or environmental measures in reducing influenza transmission.”

These Mistakes Undermine the Protection Masks May Provide

If and when you do use a mask, you have to follow proper protocols, or else you can nullify what little protection they do offer against potentially infectious respiratory droplets. As detailed in WHO’s guidance memo, you need to make sure your medical mask is:11

  • Changed when wet, soiled or damaged
  • Untouched. Do not adjust or displace it from your face for any reason. “If this happens, the mask should be safely removed and replaced; and hand hygiene performed”
  • Discarded and changed after caring for any patient on contact/droplet precautions for other pathogens

The memo also points out that “Staff who do not work in clinical areas do not need to use a medical mask during routine activities (e.g., administrative staff).” Now, if administrative hospital staff do not need to wear masks, why would healthy individuals need to wear them when walking around, especially in open-air areas?

Broward county, Florida, has gone so far as to issue an emergency order12 mandating masks to be worn inside your own residence. But why, if administrative hospital staff aren’t even advised to wear them at work?

In summary, it is likely that masks are not entirely useless in all circumstances. However, the literature rather strongly suggests the usefulness of masks depends on a significant number of factors — type, fit, length of use, purpose and circumstances — which are effectively impossible to account for in public universal-masking policies.

The science, contrary to the ignorant platitudes we are bombarded with, has NOT proven that universal masking is effective for viral containment, and has instead provided substantial grounds for skepticism of such a policy.

Benefits of Mask Wearing Do Not Include Infection Control

Despite the lack of scientific evidence showing masks do much of anything to prevent the spread of viral infections, the WHO still manages to make a case for universal mask wearing. The “potential benefits” listed, however, have little to do with health, and much more to do with learning submission. According to the WHO, potential benefits of mask wearing include:13

•”Reduced potential stigmatization of individuals wearing masks to prevent infecting others or of people caring for COVID-19 patients in nonclinical settings” — In other words, we should all wear masks to make people caring for COVID-19 patients feel more accepted, as if that’s actually a significant problem.

•”Making people feel they can play a role in contributing to stopping spread of the virus” — I.e., masks, while providing a false sense of security, make people feel like they’re “doing something” to help. Put another way, it makes people feel virtuous and “good.”

•”Reminding people to be compliant with other measures” — In other words, mask wearing is a sign of overall compliance.

•”Potential social and economic benefits” — This is perhaps the most ludicrously strained reason of all. According to the WHO:

“Encouraging the public to create their own fabric masks may promote individual enterprise and community integration … The production of non-medical masks may offer a source of income for those able to manufacture masks within their communities. Fabric masks can also be a form of cultural expression, encouraging public acceptance of protection measures in general.”

WHO Admits: No Direct Evidence Masks Prevent Viral Infection Part 1

August 4, 2020

ppjg COVID, families, government sponsored terrorism, HEALTH, propaganda, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

National Addiction News

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • According to the World Health Organization’s June 5, 2020, guidance on face mask use, there’s no direct evidence that universal masking of healthy people is an effective intervention against respiratory illnesses
  • While masks do not prevent the spread of viral infections, the WHO still makes a case for universal mask-wearing, citing benefits such as reduced stigmatization of people caring for COVID-19 patients in nonclinical settings, making people feel like they’re doing something to help, serving as a reminder to be compliant with other measures, and economic benefits for people who can sew homemade masks
  • Despite the fact that cloth masks are far less effective for blocking potentially infectious respiratory droplets, the WHO recommends cloth masks should be worn by infected persons in community settings
  • A policy review paper published in the CDC’s journal Emerging Infectious Diseases found that masks did not protect against influenza in non-healthcare settings
  • Harms and risks of mask-wearing include health effects associated with poor air quality and toxic ingredients in the mask, self-contamination caused by manipulation of the mask by contaminated hands, general discomfort, facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis or worsening acne, and a false sense of security that may reduce adherence to other preventive measures such as hand hygiene

According to the director general of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, life will not be returning to your old normal anytime soon. What’s more, things will only get worse unless the public follow health advice such as wearing masks and social distancing. The somber announcement came during a July 13, 2020, press conference (above).

This, despite the fact that the WHO’s June 5, 2020, guidance memo1 on face mask use states there’s no direct evidence that universal masking of healthy people is an effective intervention against respiratory illnesses.

What’s more, people are being urged to use cloth masks or bandanas (ostensibly to prevent shortages among health care staff), none of which conform to any kind of quality standards, and according to what little scientific evidence is available have been shown to provide only about half of what little protection you may get from a surgical mask.

No Direct Evidence to Support Universal Mask Usage

More

Wisc. Gov. Exempts Politicians From Mask Order

August 2, 2020

ppjg COVID, families, HEALTH, The PPJ Gazette , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

PrepForThat

 

The rule only apply to you, not the elites who rule you. At least that’s the message conveyed in Wisconsin Governor Tony Ever’s statewide mask mandate. The new mask mandate, aimed at lowering the transmission of COVID-19, applies to everyone in the state, except politicians.

All state facilities or government offices that fall under Wisconsin State Legislature and Wisconsin Supreme Court, are exempt from the order.

In section 4 of the mandate, a clarification reads, “State facilities or offices under the control of the Wisconsin State Legislature or the Wisconsin Supreme Court are exempt from this Order. The Wisconsin State Legislature and the Wisconsin Supreme Court may establish guidelines for face coverings that are consistent with the specific needs of their respective branches of government.”

The order is set to end on September 28th.

Wisconsin’s COVID-19 testing has been nothing short of a complete debacle. According to local Fox affiliate, there’s a 17,000 negative case backlog. The same article cites two different people claiming to have gotten both positive and negative results in the same day.

%d bloggers like this: