Home

The keys to the kingdom :“Rip & Ship” Law of the Sea treaty

12 Comments

Marti Oakley       © Copyright 2012  All Rights Reserved  Reposting and reblogging:  Retitling to redirect traffic will be treated as [theft of content].  No modifications of any kind are allowed.  Original URL must be embedded in the repost and all author credits clearly visible, including copyright.

___________________________________________________________________

Business liars and military hawks testify on the Law of the Sea Treaty

On June 28th, 2012, Senator John Kerry (D)MA, convened a hearing on behalf of the Council of Foreign Relations in support of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). Senator Kerry, acting on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) obviously forgetting that he is a Senator of  a state and who, instead represented himself as the representative of a foreign interest, claims he will not bring the LOST Treaty up for a vote until after the election so as not to politicize it. I am wondering what the delay is?

The LOST treaty would in effect be full capitulation to maritime law (admiralty law) within the United States and would effectively obliterate what is left of the Constitution and the laws and protections associated with it. “Maritime law is the law that exclusively govern activities at sea or in any navigable waters.” (1)

The question now becomes: How to use definitions and terms to imply or dictate the application of LOST terms within and upon the land mass of the nation? Simple: you simply redefine the description “navigable waters“, to “waters of America”. This covers everything, allows for broad interpretations of the treaty and the law, (meaning it can mean anything they want it to mean at any time) and then include provisions that put any complaints outside the US court system. More

Census: penalties for failing to comply

1 Comment

US Code & Title are rules and regulations for the corporate federal government. They do not recognize or pretend to adhere to constitutional provisions, protections or requirements.   You’ll note this was enacted citing the Department of Commerce and using commerce as the basis of authority ……putting you into Maritime/Admiralty law and out of common law. 

TITLE 13 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER II > § 221

§ 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers More

Smuggler’s Blues: S510…I always wanted to be a pirate!

3 Comments

From:  Slicker & Bibs

Gotta love these smucks who write this stuff, they are getting smoother.  Bottom line is that once passed the bill sets into motion an unknown quagmire of consensus building with respect to small direct market operations, places the university extension services as a educational venue. The same bunch that has misdirected farmers for generations and has led to the ultimate demise of this country’s ability to be self sustaining in food production. The selection of these group members will certainly be based on arse kissing individuals who would willingly sell their souls to the devil for a place at the stakeholder’s table.  More

%d bloggers like this: