Home

Regarding the SB 277 referendum petition

1 Comment

new-logo25Jean Gerard
Nevada City

_______________________________________________________________

Regarding the SB 277 referendum petition that is being promoted as a way to ‘repeal’ the mandatory vaccines law recently signed by Jerry Brown, there is much more to be known Vaccine-Babythan what the petitioners are telling people. This referendum is meant to put SB 277 on the ballot for a public vote – in a state where 82% of the population is PRO vaccine!

From an article on the (state) constitutionality of the law entitled: SB277 Opponents: Why Hold a Referendum on an Unconstitutional Law?:

“If a law is unconstitutional, why hold a referendum on it? The constitution is meant to prevent the passage of laws that infringe on individual rights, even when such laws have support of 99% of the population. With 82% of Californians supporting SB277 which aims to revoke vaccine exemptions, a referendum will not strike down the law. Instead, the referendum will give rise to the perception that opponents view the law as constitutional when it is not.” http://www.autisminvestigated.com/sb277-unconstitutional/

SB 277 needs to go to the courts – with the right attorneys, of course.

The article referred to above also states:

“As long as a referendum is in the works, however, such lawsuits may not happen. People will wrongly believe that opponents view SB277 as constitutional for organizing a popular vote on it, and an overwhelming vote in favor of SB277 is likely. Unlike judges, the majority of constituents will not have the chance to hear cases against SB277… “

The referendum also weakens the recall effort that is currently in the works. That recall should have the support of all of us as it will get the message to representatives that we are not happy with their job performance, and hopefully it will help prevent the future passing of similar bills.  http://sb277recalls.com/status-of-sb277-recalls/

There were many people who fought against the passing of the bill by showing up and sharing their reasons why before the legislators. This petition will turn the effort of all those people into a waste of their time.

It’s important to know that SB 277 is just the beginning of the implementation of a huge mandatory vaccine movement. Please take time to research this:

Decade of Vaccines ― Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011-2020
http://www.who.int/immunization/global_vaccine_action_plan/DoV_GVAP_2012_2020/en/

In alignment with that is the US Health and Human Services plan:

Healthy People 2020 Immunization-related Objectives http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_plan/2010-Plan/appendix1.pdf

One of the globalist’s favorite tools used in manipulating us to help further their agenda is playing on people’s fear and anger. This is why it’s so important to become educated in depth of the NWO’s Future Earth (A21) plans.  This type of ‘REaction’ of the people is exactly what they’re looking for. This referendum seems to fit into the plan nicely.

I strongly recommend that all Californian’s do NOT sign this petition. Let the process that’s in place to protect us be used and let the courts get involved. Also, unseat the people who voted for the bill.

Jean Gerard
Nevada City

CA SB277 on vaccines moves toward disastrous passage

4 Comments

By Jon Rappoport
April 29, 2015
http://www.nomorefakenews.com

California Senate Bill 277 has passed through the Judiciary Committee, and needs another Committee’s rubber stamp before it arrives on the Senate floor for debate—and what looks like a ride into law.

Governor Brown will sign the Bill. Brown has become a standard fool. He’s worn out. Whatever interesting ideas he may have entertained in his former “moonbeam” incarnation are gone in the wind.

Bill277 eliminates the personal belief and religious exemptions from vaccination. It also states that children cannot attend public or private school unless they are vaccinated according to the State’s schedule.

Medical exemptions are still allowed, but these won’t be easy to come by, because physicians who grant them will be scrutinized and harassed.

In Committee, before the vote, the Bill was changed to offer two compromises. Personal belief exemptions will be permitted for all future vaccines, beyond the current 10 mandated shots. And children who are now in school will be allowed to forego vaccination (with some limitations).

Eventually, in years to come, you can expect these two “gifts” to be rescinded.

All in all, personal freedom and choice are gone.

Vaccine manufacturers are popping the champagne corks.

For those California parents who are looking for a way out, there is home-schooling. But you can be sure that, at some point up the road, those children will be falsely blamed for “an outbreak,” and pressure will build to force them to take shots.

This Bill is going to become law, unless there is huge uprising of parents between now and the final legislative vote.

Seen in a larger context, the Bill is one element in a thousand-element program that standardly proclaims: if you want security and protection, you must give up your freedom.

Of course, as I’ve pointed out before, this program always overstates the threat from which one needs protection. In fact, quite often, the same agents of the State who offer that protection manufactured the threat in the first place.

In the case of vaccines, the preposterous notion that vaccinated children (who are purported to be immune) need shielding from unvaccinated children is a contradiction on its face.

So is the idea that children who live in poverty, lack nutritious food, and consequently function on grossly weakened immune systems can gain substitute-protection via vaccines. The reverse is true: vaccinations attack their already-compromised level of health.

In any event, parents seeking their own information about vaccines becomes a useless fantasy under this new California Bill. Everything is decided for them by the State.

In case you want to place all the blame on Big Pharma and its undue influence, keep in mind that government is where the buck is supposed to stop. This is the place where officials can say no if they want to.

Letting them off the hook as helpless victims of corporate power is absurd. They aren’t helpless. They go to the slaughter willingly. Sometimes, with deeper pockets.

Vaccination=protection is the equation that has been shoved down the throats of the population. And to back it up, we have the ever-popular, “This is science. Only crazy people oppose science.”

Ever since 9/11, protection has risen as the most important government theme: “Let us protect you, let us do our jobs, keep your mouths shut and everything will turn out well.”

People buy it. Their minds are vacuums, and they need something to fill it. Might as well be “protection.” Seems important. Seems right.

Seems like the sort of thing a parent is supposed to provide.

“Yes, I remember as a child that Daddy told me (or I wish he had) that everything would be all right. When the government tells me that now, it feels good.”

So does an endless supply of tranquilizers. Until it doesn’t.

Until the brain turns to mush.

Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at http://www.nomorefakenews.com

Aluminum and the Neurotoxicity of Vaccines

3 Comments

new logoGary G. Kohls, MD

__________________________________________________________________

Knowledgeable parents of vaccine-age children correctly fear the rapidly increasing numbers of mandated vaccines all of which have many toxic ingredients in them that are being injected into the bodies of their immune-deficient infants. And the vaccine doses do not vary no matter what is the infant’s age, weight, developmental status, immune status, mitochondrial status, nutritional status, or whether or not the child is currently sick.

________________________________________________________________

Information that the Vaccine Industry tries to keep hidden

In the last few decades since the “mysterious” autism epidemic began in the late 1980s, the giant pharmaceutical companies, free from the constraints of medico-legal liability, began pumping out more and more highly profitable vaccines, and their lobbyists in D.C., their well-paid spokespersons and the industry-co-opted “regulatory agencies” (like WHO, the CDC, the FDA and NIH) rejoiced.

vaccslowkill_dees2Then, in 1996, the Big Pharma corporate machine and lobbyists got the US Congress to do its bidding and legalize direct-to-consumer advertising for its products, which up to then was illegal. And Big Pharma has also been bribing most US Congresspersons with lavish campaign donations and totally dominated the mainstream media debates that come up from time to time concerning drug and vaccine injuries, intoxication, sickness and death.. Up until now they have also succeeded in silencing the thousands of anguished parents of vaccine-injured children who are just trying to tell their tragic stories.

At least partly because of the dire financial consequences that these industries may have to face if the stories were to be widely told, these parents and their advocates have been essentially black-balled by every media outlet that takes advertising dollars from Big Pharma. The black-listing is probably welcome to everybody associated with Big Pharma’s industries, like Wall Street executives, Big Media executives and others in the investor classes that may have pharmaceutical stocks in their portfolios (or are simply on friendly terms with medical or pharmaceutical establishment types that don’t want to destabilize the gravy train).

Tens of thousands of angry and increasingly vocal “Mama Bear” mothers, are no longer willing to accept the excuse from their clinics that “the neurological catastrophe that your child suffered after the shots was just a coincidence”. And they are demanding an audience, some compassion, some help and some compensation for their losses.

More

METRO-AMERICA & THE VACCINE SOCIETY THE GENIE IS OUT OF THE BOTTLE

Leave a comment

strip banner
new-logo25Author,
Chuck Frank
lightofthenation.us

__________________________________________________

The California legislature now aims to tighten vaccine mandates even
if vaccines are unsafe, but for now, religious exemptions or a doctor’s note may be included as part of an exemption. Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein are talking about going one step further and removing the religious exemption. In spite of this, there still remains many grave concerns concerning mandated vaccines that have not been fully tested and which have been part of the “fast tracked” program.

One of the most controversial issues for many years has been that of28056_1th
autism. For now, there has been at least 30 studies which suggest a
link between vaccines and autism.

While studies have shown that autism, Alzheimer’s, allergies, asthma
– and other chronic ailments plague people who live in Metro-America, this fact is mostly nonexistent among the Amish who are those grassy rooted farm boys and girls from yesteryear. The “experts” express
complete bafflement about this fact. More

Minnesota Department of Health Vaccine Insanity

4 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley ©Copyright 2013 All rights reserved

_____________________________________________________________________

Minnesota Department of Health: Coercion and entrapment

Question:  If vaccines actually work with any degree of efficiency (not efficacy), why would non-vaccinated individuals represent any kind of threat to the vaccinated?  Doesn’t the vaccine provide you with magical protection against whatever disease you supposedly took it for?

This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both.  The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination.  This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.

_______________________________________________________________

The Minnesota Department of Health is in the process of attempting to introduce even more vaccines into the mandated schedule for children from infancy, on.  The toxic load of heavy metals, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, fetal cell lines from aborted babies (diploids), DNA strands from non-related species such as chickens and swine, live and dead viruses, thimerisol, mercury and whatever else could be found to giving_babies_drugs-18540load the vaccines, has many parents wondering just what is really going on.  *Flu shots contain 25 micrograms of mercury. One microgram is considered toxic. By age two, most US children have received around 237 micrograms of mercury through vaccines alone. *See list below of contents of one vaccine alone**

Minnesota just recently banned formaldehyde in all products EXCLUDING VACCINES!

One childhood shot can contain as many as one million strands of someone or something else’s transfective DNA, now circulating in your child’s body.

So-called moral and social obligations that are being cited as a means of coercion to encourage parents to subject their infants, toddlers and young adults to intentional infection, heavy metal poisoning and the high risk of autism and other life long impairments, is just that: COERCION

The one size fits all approach of vaccines has produced an efficiency rate of about 34% over-all.  That means that without hand-picking an ideal group [efficacy] that could possibly respond positively to the vaccine, there is only a 34% chance the vaccine will work at all [efficiency].

Efficacy simply means that IF a selected and ideal group of candidates for the vaccine were found and isolated, the vaccine could work at least some of the time.  To find this ideal group would require extensive testing to exclude pre-existing known or unknown genetic disorders, current infections, past infections, blood work panels, and various other biological factors and medically based  information gathering. This information gathering is almost never done.

How many times has any physician done any of these tests before admonishing parents to vaccinate their child?

While harping continually on the “efficacy” of vaccines, not one of those proposing increasing the toxic load have addressed the difference between “efficacy” as opposed to “efficiency”.  Using the word [efficacy] is intentional and avoids the real issue of [efficiency].

MDH: We’ll set you up for future charges!

In their efforts to force compliance with this intentional assault on our children, the Minnesota Department of Health has responded by creating this form for parents who object to intentionally risking their children’s lifetime health with the injection of toxins in vaccines.

As is, the form is intentionally worded to imply that the parent or guardian is endangering their child(ren):

___________________________________________________

At about page 23. MDH Developed this form to have parents sign that looks like this

D.

If the parent/guardian conscientiously opposes required immunizations:

Not following vaccination recommendations may endanger the health or life of my child and others that

my child might come in contact with.

I hereby certify by notarization that:

I am opposed to all immunizations.

I am opposed to only the vaccines indicated. Vaccine(s) I oppose:

______________________________________________________

This opt-out was obviously not created by the people at MDH, but more likely created by lobbyists from either big pharma or from the CDC, if not both.  The clear intent of this opt-out form is to imply that the parent, regardless of the knowledge that their child is more likely to be harmed by the vaccine than from a naturally occurring virus, is an intentional attempt to coerce the parent into self-incrimination.  This is a trap and one that has been intentionally set.

Here is a more relevant opt out form to use that avoids the word trap included in the proposed opt out by MDH: More

%d bloggers like this: