Home

Another Push for U.S. Law Enforcement Whistleblowers

1 Comment

Coalition features two former U.S. Law Enforcement Whistleblowers
Coalition features two former U.S. Law Enforcement Whistleblowers

ATLANTAApril 8, 2019PRLog — Sixteen grassroots good government advocacy groups with a combined total of nearly 20,000 members, are proposing a new way for President Trump, his Attorney General William Barr, and Tennessee Governor Bill Lee, as well as Ohio Governor Mike DeWine to demonstrate that Blue Lives in fact matter to them.  According to the coalition’s spokesperson, Dr. Zena Crenshaw-Logal, the group is calling out “Black, Brown, and Blue Lives Matter advocates who watch U.S. law enforcement officers get crucified for exposing misconduct and corruption in their departments.”

In an April 8, 2019 letter to President Trump, Mr. Barr, and Governors Lee as well as DeWine, the sixteen NGOs under the banner of Opt IN USA, harken to assertions “that our Department of Justice (DOJ) has long turned a proverbial blind eye, even when U.S. law enforcement whistleblowers (LEWs) advise it of retaliation against them through atypical if not outright specious criminal prosecutions.”  The letter explains, “(t)his outreach is part of a multi-faceted, grassroots effort to secure exoneration of former Tennessee Deputy Sheriff Mark P. Lipton and former Ohio Deputy Sheriff Maurice Morris, respectively.  Yet it is not merely a response to their personal plights as former LEWs.”

A 2016 article chronicling Lipton’s and Morris’ plight and referenced by the coalition’s letter is titled “How To Get Away With Career Murder: The Unconstitutional Blueprint for Systematically Purging Whistleblowers from U.S. Law Enforcement“.  In light of that article, the coalition proposes that “all U.S. government agencies are obliged to suspend their deference and activate whatever oversight they have in regard to prosecutors who are at least negligent in addressing the prospect that probable cause was fabricated to precipitate retaliation through criminal prosecution of one or more LEWs (and perhaps any U.S. sworn public officer) for their work-related whistleblowing.”  According to the group, “(t)hat negligence may coincide with retaliatory selective prosecution, and if the potentially targeted sworn public officer(s) cannot access government machinery to attempt proving his, her, or their innocence as readily as government process can be used to supposedly prove the contrary, any resulting conviction is constitutionally infirm.”

Crenshaw-Logal addresses the rights of Americans to thorough government investigations in a recently published article titled “When Guys in Dark Suits Want to Ask You A Few Questions”.  Former deputy sheriffs Lipton and Morris are focal points of that article as well.  The featured coalition letter to President Trump and other U.S. officials is linked at the end of the article.

Learn More @ https://www.usa-investigation-priorities.biz/post/when-gu…

Contact
Dr. Zena Crenshaw-Logal
c/o The Rod Logal Center for Justice
***@comcast.net
(404) 590-5039

THE STARK REALITY OF GUN CONTROL

7 Comments

Author,
Chuck Frank
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

As many governments in the world are forcing the common people to give up more and more of their rights of privacy but also their rights to defend themselves from either home invasions, those enemies abroad or those enemies of the state that are from within, then one must ask the question, which is the lesser of two evils when it comes to allowing the citizenry to have guns or allowing only the government to have guns.

First of all, America has the second amendment to where the citizenry may be armed to the teeth to protect themselves from invaders, gun slingers or their own government.

Secondly:

  • There is the U.S. government also armed to the teeth,
  • meant to protect themselves abroad but also their country at home,
  • Unfortunately this includes an arsenal of ammunition,
  • 1.6 Billion rounds of ammo purchased during the Obama administration for Homeland Security plus,
  • rifles, tanks, machine guns, helicopters, drones, grenade launchers,
    heat guns and more,
  • for the sake of keeping the peace and upholding the the U.S. Constitution, which is by the way, barely even being followed by law enforcement and the courts.
  • Therefore, is not freedom now in the balance?

More

Rogue Players: Yesterday and Today

Leave a comment

Author,
Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“As an incentive,  Sheriff’s are paid money from the Federal Government every time there is a SWAT Team raid.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Whenever there is a mass shooting at an event or a school, instead of challenging gun rights, should not the people’s cry be, “where was the security guard?”  If schools are a target of terrorism, then have a security guard at every large school in the U.S.  That is a way better solution than taking guns or having gun control.  Gun control in America doesn’t make a lot of sense when a person sees that the country has already drifted towards tyranny where there is a SWAT team-military mentality,  presently stemming from law enforcement.  For the record, SWAT Teams, now have at their disposal
two models of sub-machine guns that are frequently used which are the 9mm HK MP5,  10mm MP510. or,  the .40 / .45 HK UMP or,  a 5.7mm FN P90.

This is America, land of the free and home of the brave, right?

As an incentive, Sheriff’s are paid money from the Federal Government every time a SWAT Teams are used in a raid.  There’s still more on this subject.  Let’s not forget Waco where 80 people were burned to death by the government during the Clinton administration. None dare call it a massacre and yes, the Boston massacre done by the British was far, far less of an event but this small act added one more nail in the coffin of the 13 colonies and those people’s “unrest” which later became the America Revolution of 1776. In a “free” country such as America where there are gun happy law enforcement officers with fire power beyond measure, should not the people be alarmed?

Yes, I believe they are and here is why.

More

Run for Your Life: The American Police State Is Coming to Get You

Leave a comment

By John W. Whitehead
April 17, 2017

We’ve reached the point where state actors can penetrate rectums and vaginas, where judges can order forced catheterizations, and where police and medical personnel can perform scans, enemas and colonoscopies without the suspect’s consent. And these procedures aren’t to nab kingpins or cartels, but people who at worst are hiding an amount of drugs that can fit into a body cavity. In most of these cases, they were suspected only of possession or ingestion. Many of them were innocent… But these tactics aren’t about getting drugs off the street… These tactics are instead about degrading and humiliating a class of people that politicians and law enforcement have deemed the enemy.”—Radley Balko, The Washington Post

Daily, all across America, individuals who dare to resist—or even question—a police order are being subjected to all sorts of government-sanctioned abuse ranging from forced catheterization, forced blood draws, roadside strip searches and cavity searches, and other foul and debasing acts that degrade their bodily integrity and leave them bloodied and bruised.

Americans as young as 4 years old are being leg shackled, handcuffed, tasered and held at gun point for not being quiet, not being orderly and just being childlike—i.e., not being compliant enough.

Government social workers actually subjected a 3-year-old boy to a forced catheterization after he was unable to provide them with a urine sample on demand (the boy still wasn’t potty trained). The boy was held down, screaming in pain, while nurses forcibly inserted a tube into his penis to drain his bladder—all of this done because the boy’s mother’s boyfriend had failed a urine analysis for drugs.

READ MORE HERE!

 

 

 

The DoJ Dodges a Bullet on Wilson/Brown Decision

5 Comments

strip bannernew-logo25Marti Oakley

______________________________________________

A recent article made the statement that ” When officers are on untitledvvvduty, they don’t know if at the end of the day, they are going home, to the hospital or to the morgue”.  Strange, that is just how the public feels when they are confronted by them.

__________________________________________

The Department of Justice (an oxymoron if there ever was one) just issued its decision regarding the death of Michael Brown at the hands of Ferguson, Missouri police officer Wilson that occurred in November 2014. Like millions of other people, I was not there. I have no idea what did or did not happen other than what was related on the MSM, and you already know 99% of what comes from them is pure BS.

The DoJ determined that Michael Brown’s civil rights had not been violated. So, let me get this straight…… according to grand jury testimony, an officer confronts a man in the street and tells him to get on the sidewalk, they argue, scuffle, then he fires a total of 16 shots at him, two from inside his vehicle, one directly through the top of his head within 6-8 inches…..and the DoJ was concerned with whether his civil rights were violated? That’s what they were investigating?

As an aside:   Thanks to what had to have been careful questioning and very rehearsed answers, Wilson swore under oath that he stopped the men because he recognized their clothing from the description given for the robbery……. a robbery he could not and did not know about at the time he confronted Brown.  Did  Wilson knowingly commit perjury and intentionally lie to the grand jury about what really happened that day?

More

You’re Either a Cop, or Little People: The American Police State in 2014

Leave a comment

By John W. Whitehead

Speak Truth to Power

December 30, 2014

____________________________________________

“Now there are those who still insist that they are beyond the reach of the police state because they have done nothing wrong and have nothing to fear. To those sanctimonious few, secure in their delusions, let this be a warning: the danger posed by the American police state applies equally to all of us”

_________________________________________________

“You’re either a cop or little people.”—Police captain Harry Bryant in Blade Runner

untitledvvvFor those of us who have managed to survive 2014 with our lives intact and our freedoms hanging by a thread, it has been a year of crackdowns, clampdowns, shutdowns, showdowns, shootdowns, standdowns, knockdowns, putdowns, breakdowns, lockdowns, takedowns, slowdowns, meltdowns, and never-ending letdowns.

We’ve been held up, stripped down, faked out, photographed, frisked, fracked, hacked, tracked, cracked, intercepted, accessed, spied on, zapped, mapped, searched, shot at, tasered, tortured, tackled, trussed up, tricked, lied to, labeled, libeled, leered at, shoved aside, saddled with debt not of our own making, sold a bill of goods about national security, tuned out by those representing us, tossed aside, and taken to the cleaners.

As I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we’ve had our freedoms turned inside out, our democratic structure flipped upside down, and our house of cards left in a shambles. More

How do you perceive law enforcement in your community?

1 Comment

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: