Home

Abolishing Probate #3: Chris Forsyth & Judicial Integrity Project.org

Leave a comment

Join us live October 9, 2017 at 7:00 pm CST!

More

Advertisements

URGENT HELP NEEDED – 317-590-0876 – A REAL CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN JUDGE?

Leave a comment

For the past few years, author, educator, and elder and child advocate, Dr. Beverly Newman, has been discriminated against in the Indianapolis court system, where her decades-old incurable, progressive disabilities are discounted and even denied.  Since 2015, Dr. Newman has not even been a party to her Dad’s probate case (Cause No. 49D13-1009-ES-040244) before Judge James Joven, but he continues to issue orders against her as a non-party and has stated his intent to “punish” her if she does not travel to Indianapolis, against expert medical opinions, 1200 miles from Florida, where she has stayed and never left since 2009.

Beverly Newman’s delicate health does not permit her to travel, according to medical records filed with Judge Joven, who recently struck the written expert medical opinions from the court’s record.  Additionally, two attorneys in Judge Joven’s court, Robert W. York and Robert A. Zaban, have publicly and repeatedly subjected Dr. Newman to disability discrimination, denying her disabilities in their numerous court filings over the years, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

On September 6, 2017, on the 14th floor of the City-County Building, at 1:00 PM, Judge Joven has stated he will arrest Beverly Newman if she does not travel to Indianapolis in violation of her Jewish religious beliefs not to risk her life except in extreme emergencies.  Is this what our grossly-overcrowded Indiana jails are for?

To remove Judge Joven from this case, for permitting intolerable disability discrimination in his courtroom,  and to sanction officers of his court, Robert W. York and Robert A. Zaban, contact:

Indiana Supreme Court, which appointed Judge Joven to this case, Chief Justice Loretta Rush   rush.externship@courts.in.gov

Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett      city-county.council@indy.gov

Lieutenant Governor Suzanne Crouch            scrouch@lg.in.gov

Explosive Expose by Michael Volpe: Did judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case previously fix husband’s cases?

Leave a comment

Justice for Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and Children

Public Domain

Read the Explosive New Expose by Michael Volpe :Did judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case previously fix husband’s cases?

(Dakota County, Minn) This article draws upon court records and legal research that suggests David Rucki has received special treatment in cases presided over by both Judge David L. Knutson  and Judge Karen Asphaug. From Volpe: “The judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal and family court case may have previously fixed cases for her ex-husband, raising further doubts about the fairness of their rulings.

David Rucki David Rucki

In one incident, Judge Karen Asphaug presided over a criminal charge of disorderly conduct against David Rucki.

The charge resulted after an incident on September 8, 2009, where Rucki was arrested after becoming aggressive and threatening towards his neighbors. According to the complaint,”He stated the suspect (Rucki) threatened his wife, his son, then called them all assholes…

View original post 1,061 more words

Jam In Your Face with Brian Kinter; Special guest Marti Oakley

1 Comment

You have heard her interview alot of others. Tune in tonight to hear Brian Kinter interview the one and only Marti Oakley. Call in or tune in it will be a good show

GUEST CALL-IN
(516) 387-1481
Tonight 7pm until 9pm EST

Jam In Your Face with Brian Kinter; Special guest Marti Oakley
blogtalkradio.com

Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers looks the other way

1 Comment

new-logo25Douglas Kinan

________________________________________________

The piece below is the response to one posted on Trekking Toward TheTruth (TTTT) regarding the engrained corruption in the judiciary.

“For example, in the Probate and Bankruptcy courts, the respective Guardian Ad Litem and the Trustee are appointed by the judge. It’s a judge/attorney alliance that cannot be defeated, which means that the appointed attorney can “misappropriate (court terminology for stealing)” as much as he or she can get away with.”

___________________________________________________

Response:

As the article points out, legal jujitsu and/or legal manipulations, friendships and politics, blur the lines of real justice in America.

Almost every attorney at one time or another has had a judge issue a “rigged” decision for motives that are never revealed and never will be.

The “rules” are really not the “rules” applied to everyone. Despite Rule 3:07, the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers looks the other way depending on who and how much is involved.

One of the best examples (there are many) of the Board’s negligence would be the Morris Goldings’ money laundering and theft of client funds of approximately $17 million, “arising out of eleven cases or matters.” The “eleven cases or matters” occurred over a period of approximately seven years. What did the Board do about the complaints against Goldings over that seven year period? Where was the oversight? Despite the judge’s order for restitution, not one dime showed up. Who were the beneficiaries of this theft? Who paid? The Massachusetts taxpayers. What was Goldings’ penalty? Soft time of approximately two years in a Florida “country club” federal prison. That would be about $8 million per year that Goldings “earned” during his physical and mental rehabilitation period in the warm Florida sunshine.

Every reasonable person in America knows or should know that there is no such thing as “equal justice under the law,” and that the alleged “rule of law” applies to some and not for others.

If you have no money, no status and no connections, how or why would anyone expect “equal justice?” What court of law is concerned with “equal justice?”

If you are being framed and/or retaliated against by the U.S. Attorney’s office for refusing to participate in public corruption and/or criminal activity, what can you do about it? Nothing. Unless you have money for a proficient and courageous attorney, don’t expect real justice from the federal court.

Based on my direct knowledge, certain judges have decided that pro se litigants shall remain defenseless and their verified facts and evidence mean nothing against the false claims of a corrupt assistant United States attorney.

As another example of “court justice”, the state Probate and federal Bankruptcy courts across America are used by predatory attorneys to separate middle and working class hard working people from their full inheritance and other money, by any means necessary. Prima facie fraudulent pleadings mean nothing to some judges. These two courts are, perhaps, the two biggest criminal operations in America, yet the pattern and practice of pure thievery are allowed to continue.

America talks the best justice the world has ever known. The reality is much different.

More

Ron Johnson: Fraud, misrepresentation in the courts

Leave a comment

painy

Join us this evening at 7:00 pm CST! More

TS Radio: Where is June E. Guinn?

Leave a comment

painy

Join us May 2nd 2013 at 7:00 pm CST!

madge

5:00 pm PST … 6:oo pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST

Listen Live HERE!

CAllin # 917-388-4520

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please join us this evening as we continue our search for June Guinn whose whereabouts and condition are unknown.

Joining us again will be Craig Keesler as he continues to document his fight for June’s life.  The predatory guardian who took ownership of June, continues to operate without a license and without any interference from the California Fiduciary Oversight Board.

Later in the show, June’s daughter Lynda will join us from the East Coast to discuss her mother’s case.

June’s residence, listed as her current address, appears for all intents and purposes to be abandoned.

WHERE IS JUNE E GUINN?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To contact us: ppj1@hush.com

Or Call:  320-281-0585

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley/2013/06/03/where-is-june-e-guinn

The Absolute Right to a Trial by Jury

2 Comments

strip banner

  new-logo25 Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mr. Don Bird below is pressing the point with his California State Legislator, with whom he has gained an open door of opportunity.

You see, back in 1969 a plot was engineered by the California Legislators that if they could dispose of the right to a jury in criminal cases, they could expedite cases much faster without the involvement of juries. To pull off this plot against the People of California, they had to “invent” a whole new class of jury less crimes33049_1thm heretofore unrecognized in the Constitution called “Infractions.”

While Don Bird wishes to keep his challenge limited to the State of California Constitution, I am not so limited in my lead-in statements. The fact is, in our U.S. Constitution it is clearly written:

“The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury.” Article III, Section 2, Clause 3.

The two controlling words herein are “except,” and “shall.” There is but only one criminal jury trial exception, and that is in matters of impeachment, otherwise there “shall” be a jury trial.

And, yes, the California State Constitution, as well as all states, recognizes that its Constitution and laws are subjective to the U.S. Constitution,

“The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” Article III, Section I.

Here, I would like to relate to a humorous actual incident of a criminal trial in which I was called upon to appear in court and to answer to the criminal charge involved therein. Pursuant to Article I, Section 16, “Trial by jury is an inviolate right and shall be secured to all,” More

Elder abuse in Florida: Theft via probate court

12 Comments

banner logo

Join us Sunday evening December 16th, 2012 at 7:00 CST! More

Keith Olbermann on “Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission”

2 Comments

Keith Olbermann reams the jackasses on the Supreme Court who just ruled against the people in favor of corporations. 

The Supreme Court….the first collective jackasses of 2010. 

%d bloggers like this: