On Monday night, 17 January 2022, Marti Oakley and John Leckrone will be discussing jurisdiction, what it is, how it is given or taken and how it is used to extort and enslave people. John will also discuss how the kangaroo courts use a foreign language and fraud to get “jurisdiction” for their criminal conspiracy. John Leckrone and Marti Oakley are investigative journalists who expose the new world order agenda for what it is and shine the light of truth on the tyrant’s criminal agenda. The show begins at 8 p.m. Eastern Time, 7 p.m. Central, 6 p.m. Mountain and 5 p.m. PacifHit #1 if you wish to speak to the host.
Published by Brian Vukadinovich – October 31, 2021
The state and federal judiciaries are very immoral and corrupt. While there are some honest judges, they are few and far between. The truth be told if there was a way to show the dishonest practices and the “under the table” money shenanigans that are going on, there would be a lot of judges in prison. The reason there are not that many judges in prison is because the judiciary has built-in protections making it extremely difficult to impossible for people to prove what is happening—and law enforcement simply isn’t interested in exposing it. It’s just the sad reality and sad truth. We should have learned long ago from Operation Greylord, a federal sting operation from the 1980s into the Cook County Courts in Chicago, that there are many judges who are on the take and that there is a great need to investigate the goings on in the judiciary.
There is no question that Operation Greylord was just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the seriousness of this problem, a problem that haunts us to this day, but a problem that is essentially unmonitored and unchecked unfortunately. The federal sting operation in the Chicago court system proved that there are many corrupt judges and public officials who are dishonest or outright criminals, which resulted in prison time: ninety-two officials were indicted including seventeen judges, forty-eight lawyers, eight policemen, ten deputy sheriffs, eight court officials and one state legislator. Nearly all were convicted with most of them pleading guilty.
And then after that sting operation was over, it has been business as usual again. If the feds were truly interested in judicial integrity, it would conduct more sting operations as it did in Greylord, but the feds aren’t at all interested in stepping on the comfort level of the corrupt judges that permeate the judiciary. I am sure there is a reason for that. I will leave it up to you to come to your own conclusion as to why there are no sting operations in the judiciary.
If there is a profession in this country that warrants taking a yearly polygraph exam—a lie detector test—it is the judicial profession. Every state and federal judge in the United States should be required to take a yearly polygraph test in order to safeguard the public from malfeasance within the judiciary. It should be a condition of employment for all judges. Doing so would go a long way towards “disinfecting the swamp.” The American Polygraph Association sets the standards for testing and maintains that polygraphs are “highly accurate” citing an accuracy rate above 90 percent. Polygraph tests are used by law enforcement in criminal investigations, by federal agencies to screen potential employees and for probation officers to supervise sex offenders. And yet while government agencies use polygraph tests which have an accuracy rate of above 90 per cent, it is mind-boggling that the judicial system won’t allow polygraph tests to be allowed into evidence. READ MORE
When families seek judicial intervention, they have no clue of the web of judicial abuse, deception and theft of the family’s assets that will soon ensnare them.
One typical scenario, which compels a family to seek judicial help, is an elderly family member is being held hostage while his/her assets are drained. The family does not foresee that the abuse of the hostage taker is about to be replaced by the abuse by the probate court. The various mechanisms employed by the court are limited only by the ingenuity of the judges, but certain patterns are often seen.
As explained previously Financial Rape: Business as Usual in LA County Probate Court, Judge Lippitt forces the elder person to mediation where the person is subjected to fraud, coercion and exhaustion. All the elder has to do to gain her freedom from the seemingly endless mediation is sign whatever documents the coven of evil shoves in front of her.
As Judge Paul Suzuki explained, all that matters is that she signed the settlement agreement. The Mozer v Augustine supports Judge Suzuki. It does not matter if the elder is comatose during the mediation, all that counts is that somehow the elder’s signature appears. How it got there is irrelevant and no amount of fraud, threats, lies, etc. may ever be introduced into court to show that the elder was financially raped. (Mozer cites: Evid. Code, § 1119 (a)-(c) mediation communications are confidential. “Sign this or never see you son again” – not admissible under Mozer)
It is an unfortunate fact that most Americans know very little about the form of government we have been placed under. I say ‘placed under’ because the relationship which has been created by stealth, deception, lies and confusion is predicated on keeping the American people absolutely stupified, distracted, controlled AND .
We now have a situation in which the Rules of the United States Supreme Court were changed without the knowledge or consent of the American People, forever altering our form of Government as prescribed by the Constitution for the United Stated of America.
As you will plainly see, The Supreme Court is no longer an Article III court, but is now an extension of the Office of President and the executive branch of government. THERE ARE NOW ONLY TWO BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT if that can be believed.
According to the Constitution for the United States of America, there were to be three separate but equal branches of government which established a system of “Checks and Balances” on the other branches, with the true power reserved to The People, themselves. We were all told this over and over and over again and we were proud of such a well thought out system!
The three branches we were told were: Executive( President), Legislative (Senate and House of Representatives) and Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts).
Now, we find there has been skullduggery afoot and the Rules have been changed placing the Supreme Court ( and the lower courts) under the President of the United States AS A VASSAL SUBSIDIARY. Never has this happened before….
Please note the explicit wording of Rule 45 below.
1. All process of this Court issues in the name of the President of the United States.
We are now under a dictatorship with no independent Judiciary and no checks and balances. WAKE UP!
1. All process of this Court issues in the name of the Presi-dent of the United States. 2. In a case on review from a state court, the mandate issues 25 days after entry of the judgment, unless the Court or a Justice shortens or extends the time, or unless the par-ties stipulate that it issue sooner. The fling of a petition for rehearing stays the mandate until disposition of the petition, unless the Court orders otherwise. If the petition is denied, the mandate issues forthwith. 3. In a case on review from any court of the United States, as defned by 28 U. S. C. § 451, a formal mandate does not issue unless specially directed; instead, the Clerk of this Court will send the clerk of the lower court a copy of the opinion or order of this Court and a certifed copy of the judgment. The certifed copy of the judgment, prepared and signed by this Court’s Clerk, will provide for costs if any are awarded. In all other respects, the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Rule apply.
Christine Morrison, author of “Judicial Criminals” joins us this evening to talk about her book, which is available on Amazon.
Christine addresses the erosion of law in what was supposed to be our judicial system. Having been exposed personally to the abuses of the courts, and the avoidance of actual law, she was subjected to fraudulent domestic court litigation. She realized it benefited only the best interests of court players…judges, attorneys, and others.
This is a story of perversion, criminality, and consequential social decomposition. It is a story of depraved, pathological minds using thuggery, weaponry, and unthinkable brutality to obtain selfish, illegal, and antisocial goals. It is a story of a uniquely American criminal conspiracy that even the mafia would envy. This is the story of the current tyrannical state of the American judicial system, how it has evolved itself into one of the most heinous, pernicious, and harmful criminal organizations in American history—and how those who comprise it—American judges—literally get away with murder. My story focuses on participants in modern American litigation, including me (Christine Morrison) and my captors and tormentors—American robed tyrants known as judges. I share the experience within this “systemic criminal enterprise” operated according to the craven desires of the “family law industry,”—yes—an industry. The industry is populated by “specialist” lawyers, judges, social workers, psychologists, cops, and their parasitic cadre of extortionists, fraudsters, and malingerers—who’s business model is identical to that of the mafia—use power, influence, fear, and intimidation to deplete the core of America—it’s young families—by manipulation of the machinery of American family courts. The thuggery is topped by community leaders, highly educated, well-known, and influential, yet mysteriously robed, skillfully, quiet: American judges.
After successfully taking down members of the judicial and legal community, assisting in the prosecution of more than 300 Catholic priests, Kathleen Kane was incessantly attacked with the intention of destroying her career for daring to do her job. Possessing emails from judges who had engaged in sending discriminatory emails based on race and gender, along with pornographic materials, Kane became Judicial Enemy #1 in Pennsylvania. Vowing she would take down the “good-ol’-boys” network that has turned the legal and judicial system in Pennsylvania into a modern day version of Capone’s Mafia….Kane was eventually imprisoned by one of the same judges she had been exposing. Does anyone besides us see a conflict of interest here??
We will be updating on the progress made in Alaska and also on a couple of Wisconsin cases that we are involved in and any other news that pops up today.
And thank you to all of you who have reached out in support of these shows! Thank you for taking the time to send us your thoughts and support!
“America’s FBI and Department of Justice collect files on judicial corruption like they collect files on everything else, but they hold back from acting, even in cases where they have clear enough evidence to bring an indictment in minutes. The law enforcement agencies in America blow with the political winds, and in the absence of media attention, they will cover up for judges, whose help they require when they need to win convictions on flimsy evidence. The judges who take bribes are gladly eager to help law enforcement railroad and convict innocent people. The mutual back-scratching of cops and judges is routine.”
In the headlines are the appalling news stories of Americans carrying out murderous attacks on judges and their families. In a matter of days, one judge was shot and killed in his own courtroom, while another judge had family members brutally murdered in their home.
These news stories are, however, related to another news story, which is the most taboo subject of the American media — the expanding crisis of corruption among American judges and lawyers. At question is whether the deepening despair of Americans about their own legal system, is fueling some of these violent attacks on judges.
Much is written now about how America’s economy is resembling that of a banana republic, given how America is sunk in preposterous debt, and how the U.S. dollar currency is sinking toward a possible collapse in the near future.
But there is another way that America is also like a banana republic, in that its legal system — contrary to its Hollywood image — has become a sink-well of secret proceedings, the jailing of the innocent and political misconduct; and how it is sullied with documented corruption, fake trials and court fraud.
These facts are not generally understood, because of how judicial corruption is the most un-reported news story in the American landscape. It is the category of news story which America’s newspapers and media are most afraid to report, even when clear proof is in their hands.
In America right now, judges — and lawyers who are protected by judges — can commit felony crimes in broad delight, leave the proof lying around, and yet avoid being prosecuted or even having their crimes be reported by the media. The people who work in the media see a lot of material on court misconduct, and yet they know this is the story of which they dare not speak. The lack of media coverage, in turn, encourages more judicial corruption, leaving millions of Americans in anger and despair.
Confronting the secrets of U.S. judicial corruption, is a key to understanding America’s whole social crisis, and its role in the world right now. Here are some elements of this situation that you won’t see in run-of-the-mill news reports:
The Innocent in USA courts:
Imprisoned, Sentenced to Death, Losing All They Have
The key statistic to understanding America, is that it has over 2.2 million prisoners (!) out of about 300 million people. This is 25 per cent of all the prisoners, anywhere, in the entire world. By comparison, the most populous nation, China, with about 1.3 billion people, only has a few hundred thousand prisoners, despite being denounced by the USA as a “repressive” country.
1 out of every 45 working-age males (that is, not counting children or the elderly) is BEHIND BARS in the United States. With working-age black males, the figures are about 1 out of 20. This is the stuff of revolution. More
Editor’s note: We know justice is a vanishing concept in our courts. But this recording of the Ohio Supreme court should drive any sane person up the wall. Take note of the efforts by these “justices” to divert, deflect and deny what the presenting attorney is saying. Apparently, the pharmacy hadn’t made its delivery to the court of necessary medications.
It involves a judges appointment of a GAL to a lady in a DIVORCE case. Yes I said DIVORCE!
Trust me a GAL has as much power as a Guardian because a judge can do anything they want.
I would appreciate your feedback on this oral argument. This is just another example of judges running a rogue operation and have only one motive… to steal our MONEY….
This is the ORAL argument raising a ruckus.. It is 20 min.
Charles W. Thomasson v. Carol J. Thomasson, Case No. 2016-1629 Eighth District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County) ISSUES: – Before appointing a guardian ad litem to …
Some of a few of the many exhibits Hathaway presented for supporting arguments for lack of Subject-matter jurisdiction include: 1) Their marital home was in New Hampshire. Hathaway never lived in Oklahoma, and XXX (referring to Hathaway’s estranged husband) wasn’t living in Tulsa County. XXXswore their marital home as his legal residence when he applied for a P.O. box, 2) XXX obtained a New Hampshire’s driver’s license on June 27th 2014- just weeks before filing- where he swore that he lived in New Hampshire, 3) Their marriage certificate listed New Hampshire as their legal address 4) Confirmation from the US Postal Service (USPS) that XXX permanently changed his home address from Tulsa to New Hampshire 5) dozens of resumes which XXX sent to potential employers where his return address was New Hampshire 6) While Hathaway examined XXX for her motion to vacate the suit due to lack of jurisdiction, he admitted that he did not have a residence or stay anywhere in Tulsa County during the time period required to claim Subject-matter jurisdiction. Clearly, he relied on his insiders to take care of things.
Miller, during an argument with XXX’s attorney, even threw Hathaway a bone, saying, “I don’t understand why a driver’s licenses would not be admissible to go to evidence of where a person’s residence is in a hearing on Subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Judge Miller noted that Subject-matter jurisdiction came down to, “was the petitioner a resident of Oklahoma for six months prior to filing the petition?”
When XXX testified, he insisted that he was domiciled- or had a residence in-Oklahoma at the time he filed his petition in June 2014, but when asked to provide his address, he responded, “I did not have a formal address in Tulsa.”
He even repeated this assertion when Miller asked him the same question minutes later.
JUDICIAL ESTOPPEL
Just as XXX knew he could rely on Hughes and Hastings, lawyers on XXX’s behalf, Hughes knew they could rely on Miller to make it all work. All they needed was something with the veneer of legitimacy: thinking Hathaway didn’t know better. Judicial Estoppel is a legal technicality which “prevents a party from asserting a position in one legal proceeding that directly contradicts a position taken by that same party in an earlier proceeding.” According to the Cornell Law Review.
Hughes and her team argued because Hathaway had come to Oklahoma to challenge the lawsuit, this implicitly gave the state jurisdiction, except, as in this case,without Subject-matter jurisdiction, Judicial Estoppel is moot. They all know it.
Hathaway knew there was no Subject-matter jurisdiction, but couldn’t prove it until discovered additional evidence that was rock solid. Knowing she could prove it, she motioned to vacate the suit in a county that by law cannot hear or rule over the matter.
Put another way, you aren’t allowed to go to New Hampshire’s Department of Motor Vehicle and swear you live there and turn around and tell a court in Oklahoma weeks later you live in that state, if all your evidence is a storage receipt.
By all rights, it was a slam dunk. No evidence was presented to overcome the lack of Subject-matter jurisdiction as the defense relied solely on Judicial Estoppel.
That’s fraud, and neither estoppel nor anything else can be achieved by fraud, unless your friends with facing the Orwellian Miller appointed by the upstanding Presiding Judge Linda Morrissey who ignored requests to review the gross negligence claimed in this matter in her court.
By all rights, it was a slam dunk. No evidence was presented to overcome the lack of Subject-matter jurisdiction as the defense relied solely on Judicial Estoppel.
Miller denied Hathaway citing Subject-matter jurisdiction as the key to vacating the suit. Yet, The Hughes Team didn’t use that dedense! If they had, it was still a slam dunk.
Still, knowing Subject-matter jurisdiction overrides Judicial Estoppel (the defenses claim), Hathaway filed an emergency motion for reconsideration, arguing that Judicial Estoppel does not apply because subject matter was not established. This caused Miller to augment his rulings the next day in court.
“I apparently, I left the impression and I want to correct it, that the only basis for my ruling yesterday was on the basis of Judicial Estoppel. It’s my intention to indicate that after hearing those many hours of testimony, the facts support that this court has Subject-matter jurisdiction,” the Orwellian Judge Miller stated at this hearing, “He was a resident based on the factual record presented.”
Factual Record information from Cornell University Law School Includes:
“In General. In an action tried on the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court must find the facts specially and state its conclusions of law separately. The findings and conclusions may be stated on the record after the close of the evidence or may appear in an opinion or a memorandum of decision filed by the court.”
The “factual record” evidence consisted of a Tulsa storage unit receipt.
Months after a Minnesota Appeal’s Court Judge ruled that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki was capable of paying nearly $1,000 per month in child support, the same judge ruled that paying several hundred dollars in her ex-husband’s court costs would be too burdensome.
On December 1, 2017, Minnesota Appeal’s Court Judge Jill Flaskamps Halbrooks ruled that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki paying for David Rucki’s court costs.
“Although David Rucki prevailed on appeal, it appears that allowance of the claimed costs and disbursements would cause financial hardship, in light of the district court’s determination that appellant (Sandra Grazzini-Rucki) is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.”
When someone receives in forma pauperis status, they are deemed to poor to afford an attorney.
Sandra Grazzini-Rucki has been represented in her divorce since early 2013 by Michelle MacDonald, who has worked pro-bono since receiving a $5,000 payment at the beginning of the case.
The same Judge, Jill Flaskamps-Halbrooks, ruled in September 2017 that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki had the ability to pay her ex-husband $975 per month in child support, despite Grazzini-Rucki being convicted of six felonies, homeless, and unemployed.
“Grazzini-Rucki asserts that she had no ability to pay child support because her employment with the airline was ‘in flux’ and that the CSM made ‘vague, generalized and conclusory findings’ that did not justify imputing income under Minn. Stat. § 518A.32, subd. 1.5 But these assertions misconstrue the record, particularly the evidence admitted during the September 2016 hearing. The CSM found that after Grazzini-Rucki was released from jail, she submitted a document in March 2016 that stated that she currently worked as a flight attendant Grazzini-Rucki testified, and the CSM acknowledged, that her status of employment was unknown at the time of the September 2016 hearing. But Grazzini-Rucki did not provide any evidence that her employment status had changed or that her employment had been terminated after March 2016.” Judge Flaskamps-Halbrooks asserted in her August ruling, when she confirmed that an earlier ruling ordering Grazzini-Rucki to pay her ex-husband $975 per month was appropriate.
After Judge Flaskamps-Halbrooks ruled in his favor in the child support appeal, his attorney, Lisa Elliott, filed to recoup his court costs.
Elliott did not respond to an email for comment.
David Rucki was granted child support even though he already received 100% of a multi-million-dollar estate which included numerous homes, classic cars, and the entirety of a thriving trucking business. More
Hosted by Marti Oakley and including Luanne Fleming, Robin Austin, Katherine Hine
Under its duty to the public, Congress has repeatedly failed to act to protect the public from the system of probate in all its forms. Declaring a living, breathing individual dead in the law (civil death) is equal in its consequences to a natural death. They make this declaration of death under the guise of “ward of the state”. Once a ward, you have no rights whatsoever. Prisoners who have committed the worst crimes imaginable have more rights [reserved than a “ward of the state”. Under this system, the elderly, the disabled and children are trafficked by the government for profit.
This sytem of human trafficking is the result of Congress’s failure to act within its duty to the public. As congress is charged under the Constitution for the United States with organizing the courts, it stands to reason these probate courts could not exist without their complicity and their abject failure to act to protect the public from these professional predators.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. (this bill s 178 is an example of congress abdicating its duty to end these administrative tribunals and to make laws protecting the public from professional predators and to organize the courts). (emphasis, mine)
Plaintiff Jason Hanson and attorney Jacob Hafter in court, Oct. 31, 2017 (Photo by Steve Miller)
LAS VEGAS – For the second time in two weeks, attorneys for ddefendants in a Breach of Fiduciary Duty lawsuit brought by 28 year old cerebral palsy victim Jason Hanson, tried to convince the court that Hanson was in full control of guardianship hearings in 2007, therefore he is time barred from suing their clients.
Steven J. Parsons, attorney for embattled private guardian Jared Shafer, tried to convince Clark County District Judge Tierra Jones that Hanson, in 2007, upon reaching his 18th birthday, took charge of Guardianship Commissioner Jon Norheim’s court, and from that point forward controlled his own destiny, a destiny that allegedly cost Hanson his entire inheritance at the hands of court appointed guardians, trustees, and attorneys that Hanson believes bled over a quarter of a million dollars of his inheritance in unnecessary fees and costs.
Based on today’s testimony, it appears that the defendant’s main defense is that the statute of limitations ran out in 2009, and Hanson himself shirked his responsibility to personally file lawsuits against his court appointed caretakers in a timely manner.
However, had Hanson been aware of the draining of his estate, and was able to afford to hire an attorney after reaching the age of maturity in 2007, he would have had to sue his court appointed guardians, trustees, and attorneys whom he relied upon for his well being under an unneeded guardianship that lasted until 2015.
Anne Morales“On November 21, 2016, when my Father was on Death’s Doorstep (e-mails and Hospital reports show)- one of the Lawyers filed a new Petition to, SURPRISE – SURPRISE, declare my Father “Incapacitated” and in need of a “Permanent Guardian” which is outrageous. He hung on for a while, but died one month later, and by filing this phony Petition all the Lawyers involved were now in control of everything of His, and are still in the picture even though there is no one to be a “Guardian” of. Proving once and for all what we are dealing with was NEVER ACTUALLY about my Fathers Well Being or Him as a Person, but them getting ALL His Finances $$ & Property for themselves!”
What the Erie Co. Surrogate/ Probate Court “Judge” Barbara Howe and her Posse of Evil Lawyers are responsible for doing to my beloved Father. The person my brother’s and I loved and respected very much. An extremely talented man who contributed greatly to his community and DID NOT deserve this ungodly end. I also have a plethora of pictures-video-evidence which tells the Whole story. There is no excuse for what happened.
It’s why I want the people responsible exposed/ held to account / stopped before they destroy one more life because of their (beyond the pale) GREED and ABUSE OF POWER.
As Officers of the Court- Lawyers have an obligation to TELL THE TRUTH- not manipulate the system for their own greedy gain or sick Agendas.
None of us should tolerate what has happened here, because anyone could find themselves in a similar situation. Martin Luther King said it all in his letter from Birmingham jail:-
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” – “Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly”
In my Father’s case there ISN’T ONE Court Petition or Court Order that wasn’t done in a Fraudulent manner – the paper trail / transcripts & evidence is crystal clear my Father and our Family’s RIGHTS were seriously trampled so a bunch of Evil Lawyer’s and a “Next door neighbor” who should never have been in the picture, could make themselves a lot of my Father’s money that never belonged to them ($200,000 and counting!!!) My Father had 3 Children and 8 Grandchildren to give his worldly goods to. Not once did “Judge” Barbara Howe follow (interpret) the Law or rule in my Father’s behalf- she along with her “posse” made it up as they went along. It has been a ONE SIDED FALSE NARRATIVE since February 2015, and even though my Father has been dead since December 2016, the same Players ARE STILL in the picture, racking up more bills, filing more false Petitions and creating Havoc. It has been Pure Insanity.
“An Unjust Law is No Law at All”; St. Augustine.
My Father’s wife Gladys Visser died October 23, 2014- It was a simple matter.
In Her Will, she gave everything she owned to my Father and one other beneficiary – her hairdresser- $5,000.00.
My Father and his wife owned 2 homes- one in Alabama which was in both their names and the one in Amherst, NY, which was given to Gladys by her ex-husband in 1970. It was still in her maiden Married name of “Orser”. My Father’s Lawyer told us it was a simple transaction of transferring the house into his name, as he was living in it, having been married to Gladys for over 20+ years, and my Father being the one who maintained it financially.
Instead of being a simple transfer though it has turned into a Nightmare of Epic proportions – a 2 1/2 year – “Hostile Takeover and Land Grab” and still not over! – Long story short – The next door neighbor who was named as Executor of Gladys Will got the Court involved because he thought he was going to get everything from my Fathers and Gladys Estate. Then, instead of the neighbor taking over (because my Father did not want him to be Executor), a “TEMPORARY” Public Administrator (Acea Mosey) was given the reins (against my Fathers Petition and wishes), who had a LEGAL obligation to probate Gladys Visser Will within a reasonable time frame. She absolutely refused to put the Deed of the House into my Fathers name. Obviously done to control the outcome (which she is sill doing).
By controlling the Deed to the House- they controlled my Father’s life and my Family. The Attorneys spent from March 2015 through all of 2016 trying to declare my Father incapacitated, which he was not as numerous Videos, Physician’s reports and other reports prove (done without a Hearing and most of the time while he was not being represented by Counsel). Importantly, Prior to my Fathers Wife’s Death, He was the one taking care of the Her, their household, doing errands, Driving Her around because she was ill with Emphysema. Not one person ever filed anything with the Court or any other agency believing him to be “Incapacitated”, unable to live in his own home or in need of Court intervention. More
For the past few years, author, educator, and elder and child advocate, Dr. Beverly Newman, has been discriminated against in the Indianapolis court system, where her decades-old incurable, progressive disabilities are discounted and even denied. Since 2015, Dr. Newman has not even been a party to her Dad’s probate case (Cause No. 49D13-1009-ES-040244) before Judge James Joven, but he continues to issue orders against her as a non-party and has stated his intent to “punish” her if she does not travel to Indianapolis, against expert medical opinions, 1200 miles from Florida, where she has stayed and never left since 2009.
Beverly Newman’s delicate health does not permit her to travel, according to medical records filed with Judge Joven, who recently struck the written expert medical opinions from the court’s record. Additionally, two attorneys in Judge Joven’s court, Robert W. York and Robert A. Zaban, have publicly and repeatedly subjected Dr. Newman to disability discrimination, denying her disabilities in their numerous court filings over the years, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
On September 6, 2017, on the 14th floor of the City-County Building, at 1:00 PM, Judge Joven has stated he will arrest Beverly Newman if she does not travel to Indianapolis in violation of her Jewish religious beliefs not to risk her life except in extreme emergencies. Is this what our grossly-overcrowded Indiana jails are for?
To remove Judge Joven from this case, for permitting intolerable disability discrimination in his courtroom, and to sanction officers of his court, Robert W. York and Robert A. Zaban, contact:
Indiana Supreme Court, which appointed Judge Joven to this case, Chief Justice Loretta Rush rush.externship@courts.in.gov
(Dakota County, Minn) This article draws upon court records and legal research that suggests David Rucki has received special treatment in cases presided over by both Judge David L. Knutson and Judge Karen Asphaug. From Volpe: “The judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal and family court case may have previously fixed cases for her ex-husband, raising further doubts about the fairness of their rulings.“
David Rucki
In one incident, Judge Karen Asphaug presided over a criminal charge of disorderly conduct against David Rucki.
The charge resulted after an incident on September 8, 2009, where Rucki was arrested after becoming aggressive and threatening towards his neighbors. According to the complaint,”He stated the suspect (Rucki) threatened his wife, his son, then called them all assholes…
You have heard her interview alot of others. Tune in tonight to hear Brian Kinter interview the one and only Marti Oakley. Call in or tune in it will be a good show
The piece below is the response to one posted on Trekking Toward TheTruth (TTTT) regarding the engrained corruption in the judiciary.
“For example, in the Probate and Bankruptcy courts, the respective Guardian Ad Litem and the Trustee are appointed by the judge. It’s a judge/attorney alliance that cannot be defeated, which means that the appointed attorney can “misappropriate (court terminology for stealing)” as much as he or she can get away with.”
As the article points out, legal jujitsu and/or legal manipulations, friendships and politics, blur the lines of real justice in America.
Almost every attorney at one time or another has had a judge issue a “rigged” decision for motives that are never revealed and never will be.
The “rules” are really not the “rules” applied to everyone. Despite Rule 3:07, the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers looks the other way depending on who and how much is involved.
One of the best examples (there are many) of the Board’s negligence would be the Morris Goldings’ money laundering and theft of client funds of approximately $17 million, “arising out of eleven cases or matters.” The “eleven cases or matters” occurred over a period of approximately seven years. What did the Board do about the complaints against Goldings over that seven year period? Where was the oversight? Despite the judge’s order for restitution, not one dime showed up. Who were the beneficiaries of this theft? Who paid? The Massachusetts taxpayers. What was Goldings’ penalty? Soft time of approximately two years in a Florida “country club” federal prison. That would be about $8 million per year that Goldings “earned” during his physical and mental rehabilitation period in the warm Florida sunshine.
Every reasonable person in America knows or should know that there is no such thing as “equal justice under the law,” and that the alleged “rule of law” applies to some and not for others.
If you have no money, no status and no connections, how or why would anyone expect “equal justice?” What court of law is concerned with “equal justice?”
If you are being framed and/or retaliated against by the U.S. Attorney’s office for refusing to participate in public corruption and/or criminal activity, what can you do about it? Nothing. Unless you have money for a proficient and courageous attorney, don’t expect real justice from the federal court.
Based on my direct knowledge, certain judges have decided that pro se litigants shall remain defenseless and their verified facts and evidence mean nothing against the false claims of a corrupt assistant United States attorney.
As another example of “court justice”, the state Probate and federal Bankruptcy courts across America are used by predatory attorneys to separate middle and working class hard working people from their full inheritance and other money, by any means necessary. Prima facie fraudulent pleadings mean nothing to some judges. These two courts are, perhaps, the two biggest criminal operations in America, yet the pattern and practice of pure thievery are allowed to continue.
America talks the best justice the world has ever known. The reality is much different.
Please join us this evening as we continue our search for June Guinn whose whereabouts and condition are unknown.
Joining us again will be Craig Keesler as he continues to document his fight for June’s life. The predatory guardian who took ownership of June, continues to operate without a license and without any interference from the California Fiduciary Oversight Board.
Later in the show, June’s daughter Lynda will join us from the East Coast to discuss her mother’s case.
June’s residence, listed as her current address, appears for all intents and purposes to be abandoned.
Mr. Don Bird below is pressing the point with his California State Legislator, with whom he has gained an open door of opportunity.
You see, back in 1969 a plot was engineered by the California Legislators that if they could dispose of the right to a jury in criminal cases, they could expedite cases much faster without the involvement of juries. To pull off this plot against the People of California, they had to “invent” a whole new class of jury less crimes heretofore unrecognized in the Constitution called “Infractions.”
While Don Bird wishes to keep his challenge limited to the State of California Constitution, I am not so limited in my lead-in statements. The fact is, in our U.S. Constitution it is clearly written:
The two controlling words herein are “except,” and “shall.” There is but only one criminal jury trial exception, and that is in matters of impeachment, otherwise there “shall” be a jury trial.
And, yes, the California State Constitution, as well as all states, recognizes that its Constitution and laws are subjective to the U.S. Constitution,
“The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” Article III, Section I.
Here, I would like to relate to a humorous actual incident of a criminal trial in which I was called upon to appear in court and to answer to the criminal charge involved therein. Pursuant to Article I, Section 16, “Trial by jury is an inviolate right and shall be secured to all,” More
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Public Domain 
David Rucki 
The PPJ Gazette 