Home

“We the People” vs. Kleptocracy

1 Comment

new-logo251_002Author:  Elaine Mickman

Author Contact: Court-gate@yahoo.com

At a time in society when inclusion seems to top the list for priority in government and many private entities, there is an entire and growing population of people simultaneously being treated sub-human as second-class citizens without rights over their own body and without access and supervision of their own property and income, and virtually, the right to their own existence as the result of either illegal Guardianships or the Unconstitutional Act of ordering-away Constitutional Rights.

There’s no denying that usurping Constitutional Rights is a form of cancel-culture-suppression and Official Oppression only achieved by the Courts superseding their authority and the Constitution.

Illegal Guardianships are corrupt “cancel-cartels” whose agenda is to rob unsuspecting individuals of their assets, income, and property. Guardianship strikes and expands beyond the elderly and includes targeting those in family court as well as those who are expecting monetary settlements that somehow comes to the attention of a Guardianship “gang”.

A wish-list outcome is predetermined and then the Court-system and/or Guardianship “gang” proceed with filings to create and justify a path that “follows the money-paved road”. No boundaries, no limits, no transparency, no laws. Manufacturing and fabrication of documents and tampering of records with cruel intentions is the scheme to “smash a life to grab the cash.”

Toxic officials or bureaucrats that are also on the naughty list include Court Prothonotaries and Clerks who can control or tamper dockets to “gate-keep” court access. Each court “player” is a significant piece in advancing fraudsters while obstructing a victim every step of the process. For example, the Prothonotary or Clerk of Court can impede filing for legal recourse by the Prothonotary stamping a filing late or defective so that a filing never reaches the Court for review.

Retaliation against whistleblowers who report and file Complaints can include, but is not limited to the denial of jobs, promotions, and even the denial of public assistance such as SNAP food stamps, LIHEAP heating assistance, and medical insurance for financially qualifying individuals by County Assistance employees falsifying Applications to disqualify people.

The judiciary self-determines if they are bias, prejudice or present a conflict regardless that most Judges are elected through campaigns funded by attorneys who expect a favorable ruling when a judge is elected on the bench. When Judicial misconduct is alleged, the Judicial Conduct Board is the entity where a Complaint is filed and is reviewed and determined. The PA JCB is self-policing and composed of sitting judges, privately-practicing attorneys, and some lay people appointed by the Governor, amounting to non-policing by Judicial colleagues.

The existing conflicts of interest are indisputable, but PA has also recently decided to add another layer of protection for the Judiciary called the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board when it is unclear if the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is compliant with the PA Constitution. Where’s the additional protection for “we the people”?

Most law suits against Judges and government employees are swiftly dismissed by their claiming immunity regardless that the law only provides and protects with immunity if Judges and government employees are acting within the scope and boundaries of the law, and are not abridging the privileges and rights of “we the people.”

The Privileges and Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment provides that “no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privilegesand immunities of citizens of the United States.” 

U.S. Const. Amend XIV§1, Cl. 2.

Most, if not all, states have laws pertaining to what’s called sovereign immunity. Sovereign immunity in Pennsylvania falls under 1 Pa. C.S. § 2310 and protects with immunity to those in their individual and official capacity provided they are “acting within the scope of their duties”

While every case is unique and there is no once-size-fits-all, based on textbook, the judiciary can be sued if they violate the Hobbs Act under 18 USC 1951 and Civil Rights, and government employees can be sued under a Bivenssuit.

If records support an illegal or unjustified Guardianship, a Guardian could be potentially sued for “Abuse of Process” by misusing the filing of Guardianship for the distinct purpose of accomplishing another matter for which a Guardianship is not intended such as confiscating assets from a person unwilling to sign-away their property.

“An abuse of process is the unjustified or unreasonable use of legal proceedings or process to further a cause of action by an applicant or plaintiff in an action.“A respondent or defendant typically claims the other party or plaintiff is misusing or perverting the regularly issued court process not justified by the underlying legal action.” “The elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law jurisdictions are:(1) the existence of an ulterior purpose or motive underlying the use of process, and (2) some act in the use of the legal process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceedings.”

The courts are being weaponized against “we the people” in what is known as a Kleptocracy which is when the government steals from the people.

It can’t be overstated that the courts are terrorizing “we the people“, an “Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins.” John Locke, Book II of Two Treaties of Government.

The Judiciary failing to Rule by Law has devolved into “Ruling by Tyranny” so that the courts are effectively operating as “slaughterhouses” and countless statistics of “we the people” are the “slaughter” whether through the loss of life, liberty, or property. “If eyes are turned blind to the judiciary not Ruling by Law, then we’ll never see justice.”….Elaine Mickman

* Hobbs Act- Under 18 USC 1951 is a federal law prohibiting extortion by wrongful use of force or fear, or the attempt of these crimes affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

* Bivens Suit- A Bivens action generally refers to a lawsuit for damages when a federal officer who is acting in the color of federal authority allegedly violates the US Constitution by federal officers acting.

* Civil Rights 42 US 1983 (civil) / 18 US 241 (criminal)

* Conspiracy 42 US 1985 (civil) / 18 US 242 (criminal)

How Judge Elizabeth Lippitt and Coven of Evil Threaten the Lives and Property of the Elderly

1 Comment

CityWatch Los Angeles

 

ONE MAN’S OPINION–The coven of evil, which holds sway over the Los Angeles County Probate- Conservatorship court, is not limited to Judge Elizabeth Lippitt nor is it confined to Los Angeles County.

When families seek judicial intervention, they have no clue of the web of judicial abuse, deception and theft of the family’s assets that will soon ensnare them.

One typical scenario, which compels a family to seek judicial help, is an elderly family member is being held hostage while his/her assets are drained. The family does not foresee that the abuse of the hostage taker is about to be replaced by the abuse by the probate court. The various mechanisms employed by the court are limited only by the ingenuity of the judges, but certain patterns are often seen.

As explained previously Financial Rape: Business as Usual in LA County Probate Court, Judge Lippitt forces the elder person to mediation where the person is subjected to fraud, coercion and exhaustion.  All the elder has to do to gain her freedom from the seemingly endless mediation is sign whatever documents the coven of evil shoves in front of her.

As Judge Paul Suzuki explained, all that matters is that she signed the settlement agreement.  The  Mozer v Augustine supports Judge Suzuki. It does not matter if the elder is comatose during the mediation, all that counts is that somehow the elder’s signature appears.  How it got there is irrelevant and no amount of fraud, threats, lies, etc. may ever be introduced into court to show that the elder was financially raped.  (Mozer cites: Evid. Code, § 1119 (a)-(c) mediation communications are confidential. “Sign this or never see you son again” – not admissible under Mozer)

How Judge Lippitt Champions Attorney Misconduct

More

TS Radio Network: Zena Crenshaw-Logal from The Law Project

Leave a comment

Join us this evening February 25, 2019 at 7:00 pm CST!

The Law Project

More

TS Radio: Abolishing Probate & Citizens oversight committees

2 Comments

Join us this evening April 16, 2018 at 7:00 pm CST!

More

Judge Tierra Jones Dismisses Most Of Jason Hanson’s Guardianship Fraud Lawsuit

4 Comments

.

LAS VEGAS – On Thursday, December 21, Clark County District Court Judge Tierra Jones dismissed without prejudice the majority of 28 year old cerebral palsy victim Jason Hanson’s complaint against his Clark County Family Court appointed guardians, trustees, and attorneys.

Attorneys for Defendants private guardian Jared E. Shafer, attorneys Francis Fine, Elyse Tyrell, and Dara Goldsmith, and Clark County Public Administrator John Cahill, had argued at an earlier hearing that Hanson’s case was time barred because he should have filed it when he turned 18 in 2007, not ten years later in 2017 when he first became aware his inheritance was missing.

Judge Jones agreed with the Defendants, then approved their motion to give them Judicial Immunity because they were all court appointed to care for Hanson by Hearing Master Jon Norheim, an unelected jurist appointed by Family Court Judge Charles Hoskin to help him with his case load. Prior to taking the bench, Norheim was the criminal defense attorney for known mob associate Rick Rizzolo.
Judicial Immunity is a form of legal immunity which protects judges and others employed by the judiciary from liability resulting from their judicial actions.
Because the case was dismissed without prejudice, it can be reopened in the event new information becomes available. Attorneys for Hanson are considering appealing Judge Jones’s decision to the Nevada Supreme Court.
——————————————————————————————————————
Steve Miller writes internationally syndicated columns on organized crime and political corruption for AmericanMafia.com, The Vegas Voice, and the the Canada Free Press.

David vs Goliath: The people versus a corrupt judiciary

5 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25

Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org

______________________________________________________________________

“Us small guys, the “David’s” are simply not heard. Yet, I hear naive People clamoring, “We need to reach the media.” They do not realize that the media is their enemy. They also clamor for the attention of Congress, not realizing that they too are their enemy. “…

_________________________________________________________________________

The people versus a corrupt judiciary……..

Whether one is a Bible reader, or not, they are more than likely to be familiar with the account of David v. Goliath. Even the most ardent atheist can enter an opinion regarding David and Goliath. Basically, this Biblical account found in I Samuel 17 is about the small and insignificant verses the mighty and the judge_deespowerful. Such is the situation today more than at any previous moment in time.

Beginning the early eighties I decided to take on the big and the powerful by taking action against the corrupt government within the County of Los Angeles. It did not take long to discover why government corruption proliferated within the County of Los Angeles, and that was because all of the corruption in the government was being covered up by the Los Angeles County judges. Unknown to me, I did not realize that basically all judges in Los Angeles County were on the take. I even had the naivety to believe that when I got to the Courts of Appeal, the justices would swallow their Adam’s Apple out of disbelief at what was happening in the court below them, and that they would straighten everything out. More

Judical corruption: why are they immune from prosecution?

2 Comments

D. Ceived (c)copyright 2011

_______________________________________________

“This means they can lie, cheat and steal when functioning in their capacity as a judge and you cannot hold them accountable for their actions.  This, the courts have ruled, is necessary to insure an independent judiciary.”

__________________________________________________

Anyone who has taken the time and exerted the energy to read the Constitution and then compares that document to the conduct of the Federal Government quickly realizes that most of what the government does today is outside the powers granted to it by the Constitution.  The question is, what can be done about it?

Many talk about a political solution, asserting that the wrong people are elected to office and that the solution lies in electing the right people to office.  However, this solution is overly simplistic and in denial of some of the basic characteristics of human nature. 

Why should we believe that a different set of elected legislators would react or behave any differently when subjected to the same temptations and pressures of elected office? 

Being subject to temptations of the flesh, there are few among us who have not stepped beyond the bounds of accepted standards of morality and would thereby have compromised our integrity in the eyes of the general public.  Fear of this exposure coupled with rewards of monetary gain or increased positions of power become the proverbial carrot and stick used to control politicians and bend them to the will of those who would control the conduct of government and frustrate the will of the people.  Precious few politicians are allowed to rise to significant positions of power unless they have been compromised and have demonstrated a willingness to submit to demands.

Those who framed our Constitution were aware of the fact of human frailty and created mechanisms to compensate for and correct the unavoidable consequences of that frailty.  That mechanism is called the rule of law and due process of law.  The Constitution, being the highest law of the land, the organic law of this nation, takes precedence over all statutes, codes and regulations.   More

%d bloggers like this: