On Monday night, 17 January 2022, Marti Oakley and John Leckrone will be discussing jurisdiction, what it is, how it is given or taken and how it is used to extort and enslave people. John will also discuss how the kangaroo courts use a foreign language and fraud to get “jurisdiction” for their criminal conspiracy. John Leckrone and Marti Oakley are investigative journalists who expose the new world order agenda for what it is and shine the light of truth on the tyrant’s criminal agenda. The show begins at 8 p.m. Eastern Time, 7 p.m. Central, 6 p.m. Mountain and 5 p.m. PacifHit #1 if you wish to speak to the host.
Please welcome a new addition to PPJ writers: Elaine Mickman. Elaine has been dragged, stomped on, torn up and left in the dust after dealing with corrupt family courts.
“After the court system “asset-stripped” this woman and “perfected injustice“, the court ordered-away and canceled-outher Constitutional Rights to silence her and censor her cases plagued with fraud and “cover-ups” by “gatekeeping” her court-access, amounting to nothing less than a “judicial-hit-job.” The book is intended to inform and educate the public, and “sound an alarm” to prompt positive reform.”
Court-Gate…the Courts “Divorced from the Law” : Without Liberty or Justice at all
A South Carolina lawmaker is proposing the most sweeping changes in two decades to the state’s magistrate system after an investigation by The Post and Courier and ProPublica exposed how politics and flawed oversight provided fertile ground for incompetence and corruption on the bench.
The legislation filed Wednesday by Sen. Tom Davis, a Beaufort Republican, would bolster the required legal training for magistrates who aren’t lawyers, increase protections for the many criminal defendants who appear before them and add a layer of scrutiny to magistrate appointments — posts that often go to politically connected insiders.
As the news organizations reported last month, South Carolina’s roughly 320 magistrates handle hundreds of thousands of cases each year, but most have never practiced law in their life; to qualify for nomination to the lower courts, applicants need only to earn an undergraduate degree and pass basic competency exams. As a result, these little-watched judges can sentence someone to jail for months or saddle them with thousands of dollars in fines, but have less required training than the state’s barbers or masseuses. READ MORE HERE
On the morning of Tuesday, July 16, 2019, Connie Reguli received a phone call notifying her that there is a warrant out for her arrest.
She will be turning herself in to the Brentwood Police Department on Wednesday morning.
Connie has never been arrested before. The founder of the Family Forward Project has no criminal history, nor have there been any allegations of criminal activity. Yet, for doing her job as an attorney to have the voice of her client, a parent, be heard, she is being criminally charged.
Retaliation like this, Connie says, is the reason that families often cannot get legal help when their children are taken from them. Attorneys who fight for clients’ Constitution rights such as due process and who fight against corruption are often threatened or bullied into backing down.
This makes it difficult for parents whose children are taken by Child Protective Services, no matter how unjustly. Many attorneys are simply scared.
More often than not, the allegations against parents are baseless and end up being unsubstantiated. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services “Child Maltreatment” Report, only 17% of allegations against parents are substantiated. (See link.)
The charges against Connie Reguli are facilitation of custodial interference and accessory after the fact of custodial interference in the case of a client she represented. The client is also facing charges of custodial interference.
The client’s children were seized by the Tennessee Department of Children and Families (DCF) based on an “ex parte order.” That is, the order was brought before a judge and signed by a judge without notifying the mother or her attorney.
As the mother’s attorney, Connie Reguli asked for her client to have due process and get a court date where she could be heard after the children were seized on the basis of an ex parte order.
Ex parte orders are supposed to be reserved for times when there is an emergency situation, one in which there is risk of irreparable harm if parties have to wait for a court hearing. All too often, however, they are the normal practice in Child Protective Services cases.
In the case in question, there was never any evidence of the allegations against the mother, and the petition against her was ultimately dismissed. However, DCF took her children away from her, put them in several different foster homes, and subjected the children to almost a year of trauma before the case was dismissed and the children returned home.
Action Sparks
Connie will be turning herself in around 11 am. She anticipates being released on her own recognizance.
Anyone who would like to support Connie Reguli is invited to come to the Brentwood Police Department, 5211 Maryland Way # 1000, Brentwood, TN 37027, at 10:30 am on Wednesday, July 17.
Calls may be made on Connie’s behalf to the Williamson County District Attorney Kim R. Helper at (615) 794-7275. She is also on Facebook.
We have all been taught since childhood that the United States is a democracy. I used to just accept that without questioning it. However, democracy is not automatic. It is a constant struggle to make sure no individual or entity takes control of the whole government.
The United Stated has the structure of a democracy with three different branches of government. There are supposed to be checks and balances between the three branches to prevent abuse of power by any one of the three branches of government.
The tripartite system of government is commonly ascribed to the French political philosopher Baron de Montesquieu. Having three branches of government is a necessary but not sufficient condition to insure a democracy. Montesquieu pointed out an additional requirement. The personnel of the three branches must not coincide. If a single person or entity controls all three branches, this destroys the checks and balances. The government ends up being an oligarchy.
Brian Kinter of Judicial Accountability Movement (JAM) joins me to welcome John Leckrone to the show. John also co-hosts two shows on Blogtalk. One of the most knowledgeable people we have on the realities of the “courts” and law that we have available to us! This should be a lively and informative show.
John Leckrone is a husband, father, researcher, lawyer (not a BAR attorney), teacher and whistleblower. He started his journey seeking truth at only 5 years old when his mother told him about the John F. Kennedy murder. When he was 8 his father taught him the difference between fiat currency are real money (gold and silver) and that the Federal Reserve was a corrupt banking cartel. He has spent his entire life seeking after the hidden truths behind the biggest crimes in world history.
You can follow John on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/john.leckrone.16 where you can read all about America’s hidden history and how to deal with the corruption of the court system and government. You can find him on the radio with Kiler Davenport on the 4th and Baker show and on Between the Lines with Victoria Onorato and Kiler Davenport here http://www.blogtalkradio.com/apri2018
“Your case was concluded and closed last week with no criminal findings.” – Sgt. Troyce Krumme,10/31/2017
“This case has already been processed in criminal court.” – Sgt. Jerome Milton,11/7/2017
LAS VEGAS – “Its completely legal in Nevada.” Those were the words of CBS Sixty Minutes senior producer Bob Anderson in September 2014, after spending the entire summer filming a comprehensive Sixty Minutes segment on guardianship fraud in Las Vegas.
Sixty Minutes reportedly followed private guardian Jared E. Shafer around town, took statements from several of his victims, and interviewed Shafer’s former assistant Patience Bristol in the Nevada State Prison. In the meantime, a cadre of CBS attorneys were researching NRS Chapter 159, the Guardianship Laws of Nevada, many authored or sponsored by Jared Shafer – laws designed with no teeth or criminal penalties.
We will be discussing the demand to end the probate system in all its forms, including family courts, guardianship/conservator ship, and returning to a system of law where our rights are preserved and protected.
BECOMING A “WARD OF THE STATE” SHOULD NOT BE USED TO DEPRIVE YOU OF YOUR OWN IDENTITY AND CAUSE YOU TO CEASE BEING RECOGNIZED AS A LIVING, BREATHING HUMAN BEING IN SOME FICTIONALLY CREATED SYSTEM OF STATUTES AND CODES.
NO ONE SHOULD BE SUBJECTED TO COURT SANCTIONED IDENTITY THEFT AND BE ROBBED OF THEIR NATURAL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES, THEIRESTATE, OR THEIR CHILDREN AND BANKRUPTED BY THIS CORRUPT SYSTEM.
We can no longer allow these unconstitutional administrative tribunals to destroy families and steal the lives of their victims.
We can no longer allow the judiciary to turn a blind eye to the destruction of families and individuals, including children taking place every day across the country. All for profit.
PLEASE JOIN BRIAN, LUANNE, ROBIN & MY SELF FOR THIS VERY IMPORTANT SHOW!
(Dakota County, Minn) This article draws upon court records and legal research that suggests David Rucki has received special treatment in cases presided over by both Judge David L. Knutson and Judge Karen Asphaug. From Volpe: “The judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal and family court case may have previously fixed cases for her ex-husband, raising further doubts about the fairness of their rulings.“
David Rucki
In one incident, Judge Karen Asphaug presided over a criminal charge of disorderly conduct against David Rucki.
The charge resulted after an incident on September 8, 2009, where Rucki was arrested after becoming aggressive and threatening towards his neighbors. According to the complaint,”He stated the suspect (Rucki) threatened his wife, his son, then called them all assholes…
Tamir Sukkary joins me this evening to discuss his experience in the family court system. False allegations were only the beginning. We will be discussing the trial Tamir endured and what it cost him both emotionally and financially, and most importantly the impact it has had on his relationship with his two young daughters.
Tamir was faced with a controversial family court commissioner with a history of judicial misconduct. His attempts to get justice and judicial accountability only highlighted the lack of transparency and accountability in this system and the secrecy under which this system operates.
Also, we will be discussing possible changes and reforms in family law and how access to justice adversely affects low and middle income Americans.
Mr. Tamir Sukkary, M.A.
Adjunct Professor of Political Science
American River College, Sacramento City College, San Joaquin Delta College, and Sierra College
Can this nightmare really happen in the U.S, the land of the brave and the free? The answer appears to be YES. “Cary Andrew Crittendon has been jailed in Santa Clara County, California for attempting to expose the judicial corruption in the courts in Santa Clara County. Currently, he is held on parole violations for “non-specific” charges. Apparently, no one knows what he violated, they just think he violated something. The previous charges that ended with the parole, the result of a frame-up verified by an attorney who was involved in the proceedings. A continuance has been secured until May 4th, 2015, to allow the prosecutor more time to fabricate a case against Cary which will most likely result in a long prison term if this is allowed to proceed.
The history of Cary’s case includes, but is not limited to:
1. The public defender assigned to Cary not only allowed, but failed to object to the known falsified report submitted by a detective closely associated with the court in question.
2. All exculpatory evidence proving Cary’s innocence was withheld and suppressed. Cary was not allowed to present any evidence in his defense, while his public defender stood silent.
3. All evidence produced by the prosecutor was fabricated and falsified with no actual corroborating evidence that Cary had, in fact, committed any crime.
4. The public defender refused to allow Cary to actually read the charges against him or to know what those charges were comprised of.
5. The judge involved in the previous jailing of Cary, refused to allow him any bond to secure his release. Obviously, exposing a corrupt court official is akin to a terrorist act.
6. A taped conversation with one of the attorney’s involved exists, where that attorney admits that Cary was set up and framed.
Today, Cary needs all the support we can generate for him. He is currently being held Elmwood Correctional Facility, Milpitas, California.
Please send a letter of support to:
Cary Andrew Crittendon Baracks 13 Bunk 5
Elmwood Correctional Facility
701 S. Abel Street Milpitas, California
NOTE FROM BOOMERS AGAINST ELDER ABUSE. If you agree with us that this situation is intolerable, please write Cary to support him during the nightmare he is going through. In the meantime, I’ll find out what else we can do.
On November 4, Don’t Be a Lamb Sacrificed to the Judicial Corruption Slaughter!
Richard I. Fine, Ph.D., Chairman, Campaign for Judicial Integrity stated:
“Judicial corruption is the dirty secret of the November 4, election. Don’t be misled by judicial endorsements, recommendations or voter’s guides that conceal judicial corruption.”
Fine continued:
“Did you know that all California justices seeking retention on November 4, perpetuated judicial corruption by upholding the decisions of the 90% of the Superior Court judges who received retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution under Section 5 of SBX 2 11 for taking illegal payments from counties appearing before them in cases.
Did you know that based upon their having been Superior Court judges in counties paying illegal payments, all but 12 of the 42 Court of Appeal justices seeking retention on November 4, received retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution under Section 5 of SBX 2 11 for taking illegal payments from counties appearing before them in cases.
Did you know that of the 12 remaining, none disclosed the illegal county payments when either representing clients in, or judging, county cases.”
Fine concluded: “On November 4, vote with full knowledge. Vote “No” to all California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal justices. Voting “No” ends judicial corruption now. Voting “No” is the best thing that you can do for you and your family. Not voting or voting “Yes” perpetuates judicial corruption. Elected officials perpetuated judicial corruption by passing SBX 2 11. Only you can end judicial corruption.”
The Campaign for Judicial Integrity is a national grassroots movement and organization dedicated to the eradication of judicial corruption in all of its forms.
Clear the Bench going after corruption in the legal system full blast
Names judges, crooked attorneys and provides laundry list of misdoings
PRESS RELEASE Contact: Clear the Bench Arizona, LLC
Phone: 602-374-3483602-374-3483 http://www.clearthebench-az.com 10645 North Tatum Blvd Suite C200 Box 397
Phoenix, AZ 85028
clearthebenchaz@gmail.com CLEAR THE BENCH ARIZONA, LLC
Clear the Bench Arizona, announces its mission and call to action
Phoenix, August 25, 2014: Clear the Bench Arizona is seeking to make a difference and expose the issues and concerns involving the judicial and state bar systems. Its mission statement is:
“Toward the end that the Arizona judiciary remains impartial, apolitical, and able to dispense justice, we are organized to hold all judges, courts, commissioners, court officers and personnel accountable to the People and Constitutions of Arizona and the United States.”
On October 1, 2014, the organization will begin publishing information on judges that are up for retention and setting its first meeting of the Arizona Judicial Advisory Board, an independent group of people who will take in complaints from the public, investigate and make recommendations to the legislature for possible impeachment. Clear the Bench will also provide information regularly on its website so voters can have another source to determine the retention of judges until the election of judges can be reinstated in all counties in Arizona. The existing Commission has repeatedly ignored valid complaints on judges.In addition to addressing the current corruption in the system by a small but powerful group of individuals, Clear the Bench has two main goals it believes are necessary to achieve future justice in the system-
the election of judges in all jurisdictions and,
the abolishment of the “non-profit” State Bar of Arizona.
Clear the Bench Arizona is a growing organization that unites people from all over Arizona and from all walks of life, political positions and educational levels. Most of those involved have been victims of the system and want accountability. What members have found is that there is a small group of people controlling the legal system and profiting from their actions. The names of these people and the information are already in the hands of those at the state and national level and we are continuing to provide information as it comes in. Additional information about the statements below can be found on the website or obtained through documents we can provide. Attorneys in Arizona are afraid to represent victims due to the corruption in the Arizona State Bar and with select judges and they have gone so far to disbar attorneys who have tried to come to the clients’ aid after they were victimized.
The message has been clear— cross us and we will destroy you. Clear the Bench Arizona is fighting back!
The Arizona Supreme Court is attempting to deflect scrutiny by creating the ‘move along, nothing to see here’ commissions, offices or committees including the Independent Bar Counsel office. The “Independent Bar Counsel” has already been ignored in order to execute a politically motivated attack on an attorney that represented parties against former State Bar President Edward Novak, a person that appears regularly throughout state bar and court committees including the recent appointment as Chair of the committee that decides who gets admitted to practice law in Arizona. Ed Novak represented Arthur Anderson in the Baptist Foundation litigation.
After getting wind of numerous efforts in the works to disband the State Bar of Arizona, a Task Force was formed to “study” the structure but as usual, the same players are placed on the group, such as Novak, likely guaranteeing their interests will continue to be protected. Betsey Bayless, who led the “criminal defense fund” for Donald Stapley, Jr. while he was a sitting supervisor and she was being paid to head the Maricopa County Integrated Health System and Grant Woods, attorney for Conley Wolfswinkel, are also part of that Task Force as are John Phelps and Justice Rebecca Berch who brought in out-of-state “attorneys” to pursue the former Maricopa County Attorney.
The “Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee” has the very person who “decides” attorney discipline, Judge William O’Neil, as its Vice Chair. William O’Neil has been involved in numerous questionable dealings himself as detailed in the Arizona Republic and refused to remove himself from the disciplinary proceedings against the former Maricopa County Attorney and his assistants including filing false or misleading pleadings about his involvement in related investigations. He has disbarred or suspended numerous attorneys including targeting attorneys based on his religious beliefs except has spared a few represented by insiders including Novak, putting his friends on panels without disclosing their relationship.
Other information of note that Clear the Bench is actively pursuing at all levels includes:More
New Jersey Court Defrauds Mother of $1.4M in Legal
Fees & Eliminates All Parenting Rights
Mother Launches $400M Suit Against Judiciary
Demand Judge Sogluizzo Step Down
CONTACT STU RABNER & GLENN GRANT TODAY
stuart.Rabner@judiciary.state.nj.us
glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us
Family Court – The Brilliant Racket (TM)
Remember: It’s Conflict For Cash
Actual Plea Being Ignored By Rabner & Grant:
Messrs. Grant, and Chief Justice Rabner:
On May 2,2014, I filed a civil complaint in the Hudson County Law Division, Civil Part, against Hudson County Family Court Judge, Maureen Sogluizzo, P.J.F.P., Hudson County Vicinage, Superior Court and State of New Jersey. I filed for Jury Demand, Demand for Discovery and Deposition Notice against Maureen Sogluizzo In Official capacity as a Judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Maureen Sogluizzo, in “personal” capacity and as employee of Corporation of State of New Jersey (also defined as person”); Hudson County Court Vicinage; Superior Court of New Jersey; State of New Jersey in its corporate “personal” capacity, jointly, severally and,/or in the alternative. More
BEWARE OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH & FUTURE
A COLLECTION OF CURRENT FAMILY COURT STORIES
Our divorce started in 1991, and finally ended in 2009. During that time I filed complaints against lawyers and judges for violating numerous laws and civil rights. The fraudulent acts, perjury and abuses within the divorce system were rampant. After going through the divorce, I could understand how all people can be skeptical about the entire legal system. Rather than talk about issues within the system that you must know are broken, let me list some ways that you can use to improve the system.
Allow complaints against lawyers while an action is ongoing. Now, the rules of the bar ethics committees usually will not pursue complaints while an action is ongoing and this only encourages lawyers to continue to violate RPC. When there are children and child support, actions go on for years and the abuses by lawyers continue.
Take the review of lawyers conduct away from members of the legal profession who do not police themselves adequately. I understand that there may be non-lawyers on the evaluation committee, but not a majority (use lawyers as advisors only.)
The same type of reviews and standards should be allowed against judges. Now, judges have almost absolute immunity. In those actions where judges can be sued, the actions are usually dismissed by other judges. I have observed judges act improperly and wagered with several other law students (at the time) that if I sat within a judges hearings for two weeks, I would find at least one violation of rules, cannons, law or behavior. I made that offer to one student whose father was a judge, and he refused to take up the wager.
Pass a law that will eliminate judicial immunity for other than executive, administrative, and legislative functions. The precursor of the civil rights laws (42 USC § 1983) allowed laws to be applied against judges (See the U.S. Supreme Court case Ex Parte Virginia – where a judge was jailed for excluding blacks from a jury.). Rotate judges out of specific courts with some exceptions. When judges and lawyers become familiar and friendly, abuses occur. More
“…current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable. A shift is necessary. which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations…”
Maurice Strong: Opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development
Bad things happen when Agenda 21/ICLEI advocates come to your town. When fully implemented, ICLEI regulations will severely limit access to electricity and transportation, deny the common citizenry noninvasive access to beautiful wilderness areas, destroy private business, impose unsustainable tax rates, will arbitrarily seize private property for personal gain, will promote corruption at the highest levels of industry and government, have endorsed and implemented extreme population reduction methods and now ICLEI advocates have added child theft to their list of heinous crimes against humanity perpetrated against those who would dare to oppose their fascist policies.
Stacy Lynne of Larimer County (Ft. Collins), Colorado, has been desperately alerting her community to the ICLEI form of totalitarianism which has been systematically invading her community for the past 17 years. Now, she finds herself the victim of political retaliation in which her child has been stolen from her for daring to reveal the truth.
Four years ago, Stacy Lynne began making public presentations regarding the dangers of ICLEI. Lynne opposed the “greening” of downtown Ft. Collins in which only “eco friendly cars” would be permitted to park in downtown parking spaces. Local businesses estimated that each parking spot was worth $300,000 per year. This reckless ICLEI proposal would have bankrupted several local small business owners. However, Lynne was successful in harnessing community opposition and defeated the proposal. Lynne also fought against her local government’s attempt to only employ Waste Management, a financial contributor to ICLEI, which would have bankrupted two locally owned trash businesses. Lynne was somewhat successful in defeating this measure as well.
Despite her successes, Lynne was making very powerful enemies including the Colorado “poster child” of ICLEI, Pat Stryker, whose business interests were intertwined with a group of Agenda 21 engineers, The Brendle Group, and Waste Management. This placed Lynne in the crosshairs of Stryker’s ICLEI allies came and they came after Lynne with a vengeance. More
Introduction A recent, shameful experience in the Superior Court of California for Kern County at Bakersfield left me feeling betrayed by the Bench at Bakersfield. What began in Bakersfield, though, opened onto a number of portentous discoveries about the very status of California as a constitutional Republic.
If the Superior Court’s practices in Kern County represent in any way the California justice system, everyone should be put on notice how lawless the legal system of California has become.
Presiding Judge Jerold L. Turner of Kern County Superior Court received a complaint from me in early September, 2007, about the judicial performance of one of his judges, including an outrageous decision that since people defending themselves (in propria persona) were not lawyers, they were not entitled to their expenses as a result of prevailing against a malicious lawsuit. Non-entities are also not entitled to claim sanctions against a counselor, even if he demonstrably committed fraud. He also declared in open Court that he refused to use my title of Doctor, an act of judicial misconduct that carries the fingerprint of one more familiar with the Spanish Grand Inquisitor Tomas de Torquemada ,who debased those whom appeared before him as the first order of business, than English Common Law and common courtesy. He was also involved in redacting the written transcript of the Hearing so that none of the actions mentioned above any longer appeared in the official record of the Hearing.
Presiding judge Turner replied that I had raised administrative (!) issues that had nothing to do with him. He passed it over to his Court’s “CEO”, Mr. Terry McNally for reply. As of this writing, in the closing days of July, 2011 I have yet to receive the courtesy of a reply from Mr. McNally. What I have documented to date reveals a fully formed exemplar of a ‘sham’ and a cover-up of felonies committed by two sitting judges.
A sham, according to the New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, is: “A trick, a hoax; something contrived to delude or disappoint expectation.” It also means “A thing that is intended to be mistaken for something else, or that is not what it is pretended or appears to be; … a counterfeit, a person who pretends or who is falsely represented to be what he or she is not.”
To be blunt, Judge Vegas’ unabashed declaration from the Bakersfield Bench that non-lawyers are not “entitled” to their expenses disabuses the grand rhetoric of our founding documents concerning equality before the law, equal justice for all, and equal protection of the law.
The assertion of differential justice based on membership in a state-sponsored closed union shop emits the stink of Sharia Law under which the kaffirs (we infidels) have no standing or rights in a court of law. It evinces the familiar stench of Hitler’s Peoples Courts and Mussolini’s Syndicalist Courts. And it becomes much worse. The entire judiciary is a chimera. More
As a cause working to expose abuse and injustice perpetrated against Americans by judges, it is not often that we come across regular citizens willing to “go public” regarding judicial misconduct allegations against the Family Court judge in their case. The risks of reprisals by the judge in the form of oppressive and unjust court rulings, reduced child visitation rights, costly monetary judgments, excessive reimbursement of attorney fees, and sometimes even vindictive incarcerations are enormous. But we came across one such citizen willing to risk it all for the sake of true justice for the self-represented. His name is Edward J. Dort and he needs your help.
Below is the link to a Petition that we are distributing to all friends and supporters. It gives a brief story of what Mr. Dort is suffering at the hands of two judges in Fulton County, Georgia. Moreover, the Petition seeks remedies favorable to ALL SELF-LITIGANTS. We respectfully ask that you sign it and forward it to all of your contacts as quickly and as effectively as possible. Let’s show Mr. Dort that the justice-fighting public does care about these issues and the sacrifices he has tearfully made.
MORE IMPORTANTLY ….. Mr. Dort has a hearing coming up on January 31st before one of the judges that he has publicly exposed for her judicial bias and abuse. He stands to take a LOT of heat for going public. In fact, despite losing a fortune to unfair monetary judgments and having not seen his alienated daughter in more than two years, the ANGRY judge in the last hearing threatened Mr. Dort with a JAIL CELL!! How the next hearing goes is up to us because the more public support we can give Mr. Dort, the greater the fairness he will receive. PLEASE help by signing the Petition and passing it on TODAY.
Thank you very much for your support for this important effort.
Most of us have concluded that our judicial system is a farce with the entire country choking on the corruption of the judiciary on all levels. We have become far too tolerant of judicial misconduct and the intentional refusal to adhere to the law and constitutional rights by what has become known as the Black Robed Mafia. Never are the citizens of any state in greater danger than when they are forced to step into any court room in this country.
On too many occasions judges openly declare that the law is “what I say it is”, then proceed to violate rights, refuse to allow evidence that would counter the oppositions arguments, threaten plaintiff’s and/or defendants with jail for demanding their rights, or, if all else fails, refuse to allow them to speak in their own defense. We even have instances of judges threatening the victims in their courtrooms with jail for mentioning the Constitution.
The Supreme Court of the United States has become an unnecessary burden on the country, rendering obviously unconstitutional opinions and rulings bearing little resemblance to the rule of law and the constitution. The state courts are following suit and rendering a few zingers of their own which should have each of them disbanded until a suitable reconstruction effort can be achieved. More
(Editor’s note: Since we first aired this story on a live broadcast in January 2011, we learned that Mrs. Arlene English passed away on April 8 at the age of 89. New details about English’s quality of health care, provided by her son, Neil Roe, have been included in this article.) More
My last posted article took me far away from my comfort zone. In “A Heartbreaking Story of Elder Abuse” I outlined the plight of my friend’s fight for her mother’s rights to be restored. Whether you believe in the ability of mediums and psychics or not, that is generally what my efforts are put into. It was not something I sought, but rather given by a Power unexplained to me. Over the years it has allowed me to have helped thousands of people get focused on their life path, as well as to bring about a healing to most of them on numerous levels. The reason I am sharing this is that I have always tried to adjust to what is requested of me by the “inner drive” that often seems to differ from my personal concepts, wants and desires. That probably makes more sense to those of you who are on a good spiritual or religious path. More
National Association to Stop Guardianship Abuse (NASGA)
Dorothy Wilson is 85 years old and suffers from early dementia. She is not a stroke victim or in a wheelchair, and she does not need to be washed or bathed. She cleans and cooks for herself.
I applied for guardianship in December, 2008, but my siblings fought this. In March, 2009, a geriatric “care” manager and guardian were assigned to my mother and she was declared incapacitated. An order was issued for an aide in her home 24/7, but soon arrangements were made for Mom to stay with family on weekends. Restricted pickup and return times were ordered, and although I requested relief many times, but the judge refused to allow it. His decision was based on the care manager’s assertion that 9am on a Saturday to pickup and 9am on a Monday to return is the only time the agency, Home Companion Services of Port Jefferson, will allow.
One aide soon became Mom’s friend and confidant. On September 15, 2009, the care manager went to my mother’s house with a new aide that does not drive, and ordered the other aide to leave or she would call the police. Mom insisted she did not want Cheri to leave and she was threatened as well. The guardian claimed she did this for my mother’s “safety” although nothing had happened.
The court has refused to allow my mother to stay with family additional days when someone is available, which is what she wants, and would save her thousands of dollars in agency fees. No one listens to her or respects her wishes. After Mom complained to me and her attorney about the violation of her privacy and HIPPA rights, her attorney advised the judge via letter on October 30, 2009. False allegations were then made against me by the guardian and the care manager. On November 10, 2009, the guardian mailed a letter to me stating that I violated the court orders prohibiting anyone from discussing costs with Mom and she imposed supervised visitation. More
By Terri LaPoint
Public Domain 
David Rucki 
The PPJ Gazette 