Home

The Whistleblower Summit for Human Rights July 27 & 28, 2017 Washington DC

4 Comments

Use this link to view the events timeline for the summit.

http://www.whistleblowersummit.com/summit_at_a_glance/  More

Advertisements

Explosive Expose by Michael Volpe: Did judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case previously fix husband’s cases?

Leave a comment

Justice for Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and Children

Public Domain

Read the Explosive New Expose by Michael Volpe :Did judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case previously fix husband’s cases?

(Dakota County, Minn) This article draws upon court records and legal research that suggests David Rucki has received special treatment in cases presided over by both Judge David L. Knutson  and Judge Karen Asphaug. From Volpe: “The judges in Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s criminal and family court case may have previously fixed cases for her ex-husband, raising further doubts about the fairness of their rulings.

David Rucki David Rucki

In one incident, Judge Karen Asphaug presided over a criminal charge of disorderly conduct against David Rucki.

The charge resulted after an incident on September 8, 2009, where Rucki was arrested after becoming aggressive and threatening towards his neighbors. According to the complaint,”He stated the suspect (Rucki) threatened his wife, his son, then called them all assholes…

View original post 1,061 more words

TS Radio with Tamir Sukkary: The injustice in family courts

47 Comments

TS RAdioJoin us this evening, December 11, 2015 at 6:00 pm CST!

2court4:00 pm PST … 5:00 pm MST … 6:00 pm CST … 7:00 pm EST

Listen live HERE!

Call in # 917-388-4520

Hosted by Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tamir Sukkary joins me this evening to discuss his experience in the family court system.  False allegations were only the beginning. We will be discussing the trial Tamir endured and what it cost him both emotionally and financially, and most importantly the impact it has had on his relationship with his two young daughters.

http://www.gofundme.com/justicematters

Tamir was faced with a controversial family court commissioner with a history of judicial misconduct.  His attempts to get justice and judicial accountability only highlighted the lack of transparency and accountability in this system and the secrecy under which this system operates.

Also, we will be discussing possible changes and reforms in family law and how access to justice adversely affects low and middle income Americans.

Mr. Tamir Sukkary, M.A.

Adjunct Professor of Political Science
American River College, Sacramento City College, San Joaquin Delta College, and Sierra College

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley/2015/12/12/tamir-sukkary-the-injustice-in-family-courts

Santa Clara County, California: The Malicious Prosecution of Cary Crittendon

2 Comments

2court

Can this nightmare really happen in the U.S, the land of the brave and the free? The answer appears to be YES. “Cary Andrew Crittendon has been jailed in Santa Clara County, California for attempting to expose the judicial corruption in the courts in Santa Clara County. Currently, he is held on parole violations for “non-specific” charges. Apparently, no one knows what he violated, they just think he violated something. The previous charges that ended with the parole, the result of a frame-up verified by an attorney who was involved in the proceedings. A continuance has been secured until May 4th, 2015, to allow the prosecutor more time to fabricate a case against Cary which will most likely result in a long prison term if this is allowed to proceed.
The history of Cary’s case includes, but is not limited to:

1. The public defender assigned to Cary not only allowed, but failed to object to the known falsified report submitted by a detective closely associated with the court in question.

2. All exculpatory evidence proving Cary’s innocence was withheld and suppressed. Cary was not allowed to present any evidence in his defense, while his public defender stood silent.

3. All evidence produced by the prosecutor was fabricated and falsified with no actual corroborating evidence that Cary had, in fact, committed any crime.

4. The public defender refused to allow Cary to actually read the charges against him or to know what those charges were comprised of.

5. The judge involved in the previous jailing of Cary, refused to allow him any bond to secure his release. Obviously, exposing a corrupt court official is akin to a terrorist act.
6. A taped conversation with one of the attorney’s involved exists, where that attorney admits that Cary was set up and framed.

Today, Cary needs all the support we can generate for him. He is currently being held Elmwood Correctional Facility, Milpitas, California.

Please send a letter of support to:

Cary Andrew Crittendon Baracks 13 Bunk 5

Elmwood Correctional Facility

701 S. Abel Street
Milpitas, California

NOTE FROM BOOMERS AGAINST ELDER ABUSE. If you agree with us that this situation is intolerable, please write Cary to support him during the nightmare he is going through. In the meantime, I’ll find out what else we can do.

California: Campaign for Judicial Integrity

2 Comments

strip banner
new-logo25On November 4, Don’t Be a Lamb Sacrificed to the Judicial Corruption Slaughter!

Richard I. Fine, Ph.D., Chairman, Campaign for Judicial Integrity stated:

“Judicial corruption is the dirty secret of the November 4, election. Don’t be misled by judicial endorsements, recommendations or voter’s guides that conceal judicial corruption.”

Fine continued:

“Did you know that all California justices seeking retention on November 4, perpetuated judicial corruption by upholding the decisions of the 90% of the Superior Court judges who received retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution under Section 5 of SBX 2 11 for taking illegal payments from counties appearing before them in cases.

Did you know that based upon their having been Superior Court judges in counties paying illegal payments, all but 12 of the 42 Court of Appeal justices seeking retention on November 4, received retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution under Section 5 of SBX 2 11 for taking illegal payments from counties appearing before them in cases.

Did you know that of the 12 remaining, none disclosed the illegal county payments when either representing clients in, or judging, county cases.”

Please visit: http://www.campaignforjudicialintegrity.org/ to see the justices engaged in judicial corruption.

Fine concluded: “On November 4, vote with full knowledge. Vote “No” to all California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal justices. Voting “No” ends judicial corruption now. Voting “No” is the best thing that you can do for you and your family. Not voting or voting “Yes” perpetuates judicial corruption. Elected officials perpetuated judicial corruption by passing SBX 2 11. Only you can end judicial corruption.”

The Campaign for Judicial Integrity is a national grassroots movement and organization dedicated to the eradication of judicial corruption in all of its forms.

Links:

1. http://www.campaignforjudicialintegrity.org
Exercise your Rights; Vote for Justice on November 4.


It’s time People hold Judges accountable to our Grand Juries

Arizona: Clear the Bench going after corruption in the legal system full blast

10 Comments

strip bannerA m e r i c a n P o s t – G a z e t t e

Distributed by C O M M O N S E N S E , in Arizona

Monday, August 25th, 2014

Clear the Bench going after corruption in the legal system full blast

Names judges, crooked attorneys and provides laundry list of misdoings

 

PRESS RELEASE Contact: Clear the Bench Arizona, LLC
Phone: 602-374-3483602-374-3483
http://www.clearthebench-az.com 10645 North Tatum Blvd Suite C200 Box 397
Phoenix, AZ 85028
clearthebenchaz@gmail.com CLEAR THE BENCH ARIZONA, LLC
Clear the Bench Arizona, announces its mission and call to action

Phoenix, August 25, 2014: Clear the Bench Arizona is seeking to make a difference and expose the issues and concerns involving the judicial and state bar systems. Its mission statement is:

“Toward the end that the Arizona judiciary remains impartial, apolitical, and able to dispense justice, we are organized to hold all judges, courts, commissioners, court officers and personnel accountable to the People and Constitutions of Arizona and the United States.”

On October 1, 2014, the organization will begin publishing information on judges that are up for retention and setting its first meeting of the Arizona Judicial Advisory Board, an independent group of people who will take in complaints from the public, investigate and make recommendations to the legislature for possible impeachment. Clear the Bench will also provide information regularly on its website so voters can have another source to determine the retention of judges until the election of judges can be reinstated in all counties in Arizona. The existing Commission has repeatedly ignored valid complaints on judges.In addition to addressing the current corruption in the system by a small but powerful group of individuals, Clear the Bench has two main goals it believes are necessary to achieve future justice in the system-

  • the election of judges in all jurisdictions and,
  • the abolishment of the “non-profit” State Bar of Arizona.

Clear the Bench Arizona is a growing organization that unites people from all over Arizona and from all walks of life, political positions and educational levels. Most of those involved have been victims of the system and want accountability. What members have found is that there is a small group of people controlling the legal system and profiting from their actions. The names of these people and the information are already in the hands of those at the state and national level and we are continuing to provide information as it comes in. Additional information about the statements below can be found on the website or obtained through documents we can provide. Attorneys in Arizona are afraid to represent victims due to the corruption in the Arizona State Bar and with select judges and they have gone so far to disbar attorneys who have tried to come to the clients’ aid after they were victimized.

The message has been clear— cross us and we will destroy you. Clear the Bench Arizona is fighting back!

The Arizona Supreme Court is attempting to deflect scrutiny by creating the ‘move along, nothing to see here’ commissions, offices or committees including the Independent Bar Counsel office. The “Independent Bar Counsel” has already been ignored in order to execute a politically motivated attack on an attorney that represented parties against former State Bar President Edward Novak, a person that appears regularly throughout state bar and court committees including the recent appointment as Chair of the committee that decides who gets admitted to practice law in Arizona. Ed Novak represented Arthur Anderson in the Baptist Foundation litigation.

After getting wind of numerous efforts in the works to disband the State Bar of Arizona, a Task Force was formed to “study” the structure but as usual, the same players are placed on the group, such as Novak, likely guaranteeing their interests will continue to be protected. Betsey Bayless, who led the “criminal defense fund” for Donald Stapley, Jr. while he was a sitting supervisor and she was being paid to head the Maricopa County Integrated Health System and Grant Woods, attorney for Conley Wolfswinkel, are also part of that Task Force as are John Phelps and Justice Rebecca Berch who brought in out-of-state “attorneys” to pursue the former Maricopa County Attorney.

The “Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee” has the very person who “decides” attorney discipline, Judge William O’Neil, as its Vice Chair. William O’Neil has been involved in numerous questionable dealings himself as detailed in the Arizona Republic and refused to remove himself from the disciplinary proceedings against the former Maricopa County Attorney and his assistants including filing false or misleading pleadings about his involvement in related investigations. He has disbarred or suspended numerous attorneys including targeting attorneys based on his religious beliefs except has spared a few represented by insiders including Novak, putting his friends on panels without disclosing their relationship.

Other information of note that Clear the Bench is actively pursuing at all levels includes: More

New Jersey Court Defrauds Mother of $1.4M in Legal Fees & Eliminates All Parenting Rights

9 Comments

FCLUlogoB2

STOP LEGAL ABUSE OF A MOTHER

New Jersey Court Defrauds Mother of $1.4M in Legal
Fees & Eliminates All Parenting Rights

Mother Launches $400M Suit Against Judiciary

Demand Judge Sogluizzo Step Down
CONTACT STU RABNER & GLENN GRANT TODAY
stuart.Rabner@judiciary.state.nj.us
glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us

Family Court – The Brilliant Racket (TM)
Remember: It’s Conflict For Cash

Actual Plea Being Ignored By Rabner & Grant:

Messrs. Grant, and Chief Justice Rabner:

On May 2,2014, I filed a civil complaint in the Hudson County Law Division, Civil Part, against Hudson County Family Court Judge, Maureen Sogluizzo, P.J.F.P., Hudson County Vicinage, Superior Court and State of New Jersey. I filed for Jury Demand, Demand for Discovery and Deposition Notice against Maureen Sogluizzo In Official capacity as a Judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Maureen Sogluizzo, in “personal” capacity and as employee of Corporation of State of New Jersey (also defined as person”); Hudson County Court Vicinage; Superior Court of New Jersey; State of New Jersey in its corporate “personal” capacity, jointly, severally and,/or in the alternative. More

TS Radio: Guardianship Abuse in California with Ernest Moore

Leave a comment

painy

Please join us April 27th, 2014 at 7:00 pm CST! More

TS Radio: Criminal abuse: Stories from around the country

2 Comments

painy

Join us this evening at 7:00 pm CST!

thumbnailca9aivsb

5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST… 7:00 pm EST … 8:00 pm EST More

formal charge of collusion and criminal acts against the United States Judicial system

9 Comments

strip banner

August 15, 2013

To:

United States House of Representatives

C/O The Committee on the Judiciary

2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
p/202-225-3951

From:

Ron Johnson Pro Se Complainant More

TS Radio: Mothers Day tribute and Operation Clean Sweep

1 Comment

painy

Join us Sunday May 12th, 2013 at 7:00pm CST! More

SHORT STORIES OF “FAMILY” COURT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION

60 Comments

FCLUlogoB2

BEWARE OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH & FUTURE

A COLLECTION OF CURRENT FAMILY COURT STORIES

Our divorce started in 1991, and finally ended in 2009. During that time I filed complaints against lawyers and judges for violating numerous laws and civil rights. The fraudulent acts, perjury and abuses within the divorce system were rampant. After going through the divorce, I could understand how all people can be skeptical about the entire legal system. Rather than talk about issues within the system that you must know are broken, let me list some ways that you can use to improve the system.

Allow complaints against lawyers while an action is ongoing. Now, the rules of the bar ethics committees usually will not pursue complaints while an action is ongoing and this only encourages lawyers to continue to violate RPC. When there are children and child support, actions go on for years and the abuses by lawyers continue.

Take the review of lawyers conduct away from members of the legal profession who do not police themselves adequately. I understand that there may be non-lawyers on the evaluation committee, but not a majority (use lawyers as advisors only.)

The same type of reviews and standards should be allowed against judges. Now, judges have almost absolute immunity. In those actions where judges can be sued, the actions are usually dismissed by other judges. I have observed judges act improperly and wagered with several other law students (at the time) that if I sat within a judges hearings for two weeks, I would find at least one violation of rules, cannons, law or behavior. I made that offer to one student whose father was a judge, and he refused to take up the wager.

Pass a law that will eliminate judicial immunity for other than executive, administrative, and legislative functions. The precursor of the civil rights laws (42 USC § 1983) allowed laws to be applied against judges (See the U.S. Supreme Court case Ex Parte Virginia – where a judge was jailed for excluding blacks from a jury.). Rotate judges out of specific courts with some exceptions. When judges and lawyers become familiar and friendly, abuses occur. More

Alternatives to guardianship: what they won’t tell you

2 Comments

banner logo

Join us Sunday Evening December 30th, 2012 at 7:00 CST! More

Expose Our Corruption and We Will Steal Your Child!

6 Comments

Email: thecommonsenseshow@yahoo.com

Web:thecommonsenseshow.weebly.com

By: Dave Hodges

_______________________________

“…current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing – are not sustainable. A shift is necessary. which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations…”

Maurice Strong: Opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development

_______________________________________________________________________

Bad things happen when Agenda 21/ICLEI advocates come to your town. When fully implemented, ICLEI regulations will severely limit access to electricity and transportation, deny the common citizenry noninvasive access to beautiful wilderness areas, destroy private business, impose unsustainable tax rates, will arbitrarily seize private property for personal gain, will promote corruption at the highest levels of industry and government, have endorsed and implemented extreme population reduction methods and now ICLEI advocates have added child theft to their list of heinous crimes against humanity perpetrated against those who would dare to oppose their fascist policies.

Stacy Lynne of Larimer County (Ft. Collins), Colorado, has been desperately alerting her community to the ICLEI form of totalitarianism which has been systematically invading her community for the past 17 years. Now, she finds herself the victim of political retaliation in which her child has been stolen from her for daring to reveal the truth.

Four years ago, Stacy Lynne began making public presentations regarding the dangers of ICLEI. Lynne opposed the “greening” of downtown Ft. Collins in which only “eco friendly cars” would be permitted to park in downtown parking spaces. Local businesses estimated that each parking spot was worth $300,000 per year. This reckless ICLEI proposal would have bankrupted several local small business owners. However, Lynne was successful in harnessing community opposition and defeated the proposal. Lynne also fought against her local government’s attempt to only employ Waste Management, a financial contributor to ICLEI, which would have bankrupted two locally owned trash businesses. Lynne was somewhat successful in defeating this measure as well.

Despite her successes, Lynne was making very powerful enemies including the Colorado “poster child” of ICLEI, Pat Stryker, whose business interests were intertwined with a group of Agenda 21 engineers, The Brendle Group, and Waste Management. This placed Lynne in the crosshairs of Stryker’s ICLEI allies came and they came after Lynne with a vengeance. More

Junk Justice in the Golden State

11 Comments

Paul W. Clark, A.M., M.S.E.E., Ph.D., F.R.G.S.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Introduction
A recent, shameful experience in the Superior Court of California for Kern County at Bakersfield left me feeling betrayed by the Bench at Bakersfield. What began in Bakersfield, though, opened onto a number of portentous discoveries about the very status of California as a constitutional Republic.

If the Superior Court’s practices in Kern County represent in any way the California justice system, everyone should be put on notice how lawless the legal system of California has become.

Presiding Judge Jerold L. Turner of Kern County Superior Court received a complaint from me in early September, 2007, about the judicial performance of one of his judges, including an outrageous decision that since people defending themselves (in propria persona) were not lawyers, they were not entitled to their expenses as a result of prevailing against a malicious lawsuit. Non-entities are also not entitled to claim sanctions against a counselor, even if he demonstrably committed fraud. He also declared in open Court that he refused to use my title of Doctor, an act of judicial misconduct that carries the fingerprint of one more familiar with the Spanish Grand Inquisitor Tomas de Torquemada ,who debased those whom appeared before him as the first order of business, than English Common Law and common courtesy. He was also involved in redacting the written transcript of the Hearing so that none of the actions mentioned above any longer appeared in the official record of the Hearing.

Presiding judge Turner replied that I had raised administrative (!) issues that had nothing to do with him. He passed it over to his Court’s “CEO”, Mr. Terry McNally for reply. As of this writing, in the closing days of July, 2011 I have yet to receive the courtesy of a reply from Mr. McNally. What I have documented to date reveals a fully formed exemplar of a ‘sham’ and a cover-up of felonies committed by two sitting judges.

A sham, according to the New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, is: “A trick, a hoax; something contrived to delude or disappoint expectation.” It also means “A thing that is intended to be mistaken for something else, or that is not what it is pretended or appears to be; … a counterfeit, a person who pretends or who is falsely represented to be what he or she is not.”

To be blunt, Judge Vegas’ unabashed declaration from the Bakersfield Bench that non-lawyers are not “entitled” to their expenses disabuses the grand rhetoric of our founding documents concerning equality before the law, equal justice for all, and equal protection of the law.

The assertion of differential justice based on membership in a state-sponsored closed union shop emits the stink of Sharia Law under which the kaffirs (we infidels) have no standing or rights in a court of law. It evinces the familiar stench of Hitler’s Peoples Courts and Mussolini’s Syndicalist Courts. And it becomes much worse. The entire judiciary is a chimera. More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: