Home

Abolishing probate: Ignorance of the law and Administrative “Star Chamber” Tribunals

9 Comments

Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Star Chambers

“2. any tribunal, committee, or the like, which proceeds by arbitrary or unfair methods.

Is this not the definition of today’s administrative tribunals called “probate”?

They also have unlimited power to collude with attorneys, guardians, agencies and other interested parties to make sure the hearing limits any relevant objections, evidence or statements that might adversely affect the outcome of what has been agreed to behind the scenes.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is a maxim of law, that you cannot claim ignorance of the law as any form of defense against the hundreds of thousands of laws, regulations, codes, statutes, rules and other contrivances created not to just confuse the average person, but to leave them utterly speechless at the mountains of many times nonsensical, contorted, twisted and perverted and torturous records of what is supposed to comprise our government and justice system and keep order. The lunatics are in fact, running the asylum.

The Fallacy of Judicial Immunity

Remember when they were grilling Samuel Alito prior to his confirmation for SCOTUS? I watched those hearings as he was asked repeatedly; “Will you uphold stare decisis”? Of course I had to find out why that was so important to the panel. Simply put, it means issues already settled whether they were Constitutional or not.

Stare decisis is Latin for “to stand by things decided.” In short, it is the doctrine of precedent.

Courts cite to stare decisis when an issue has been previously brought to the court and a ruling already issued. According to the Supreme Court, stare decisis\promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and consistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process.” In practice, the Supreme Court will usually defer to its previous decisions even if the soundness of the decision is in doubt. (emphasis, mine) Read more HERE:

According to the court? Really? Well, according to me , a non-lawyer, on its face this is null and void as each case is to be decided on its own merits. Instead of adhering to actual law, they revert to previous cases that many times are clear violations of law in the court’s rulings and decisions. They call it “precedence”. I call it malfeasance for starters.

Malfeasance defined: Intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful, especially by officials or public employees. Malfeasance is at a higher level of wrongdoing than nonfeasance (failure to act where there was a duty to act) or misfeasance (conduct that is lawful but inappropriate). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/malfeasance

Under 42 USC 1983: State officers may be held personally liable for damages under 1983 based upon actions taken in their official capacities. Pp. 3-10.

; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. https://www.casebriefs.com

See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. “When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.

But what about these Administrative Executive Appointees and elected Administrative judges?

More

Dis-honest Lawyers, Judges and Government

2 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25

Robert Gettinger

 

 

10252043_631709193589576_7022154908430043279_n

FAMILY LAW PROFESSIONALS – SPECIAL OFFER FROM FCLU!

3 Comments

FCLUlogoB2

Get the New FCLU Family Law Business Development Mobile App – Free!!

*(Android & IOS7 Platforms Only)

It’s the only app that determines the location of crony family law judges and adversary’s lawyers and triangulates you all to the nearest coffee shop, country club or bar for ex parte communications and client bashing while you plan new conflicts to steal family assets, college and retirement funds.

AND…If you sign up immediately, it comes with our free, proprietary spinner board function that helps you select the

False Accusation of the Day(TM)

with pre-loaded accusations spanning:

  • alcoholism,
  • drug abuse,
  • prostitution,
  • pedophilia,
  • mental illness and
  • many other made up accusations.

Your “Experts” will remember you fondly during the next holiday season!

GET IT TODAY and BUILD YOUR BU$INESS!!
(Remember – It’s Conflict for CASH)

FAMILY LAW – THE BRILLIANT RACKET(TM)

*Limited Time Only for the Holidays – Happy Holidays!!

*Offer Valid to Lying, Collusive & Fraudulent Lawyers, Judges & “Experts” Only – But Everywhere!

*Android and IOS7 Are Registered Trademarks of Google & Apple Respectively

*Cash Value of Offer = 1/10 of 1 Cent. Offer Valid Until 12/10/13

Contact Us TODAY!!

Families Civil Liberties Union
www.fclu.org

Copyright © FCLU, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

FCLU

PO BOX 1011New York, NY 10036
Add us to your address book

SHORT STORIES OF “FAMILY” COURT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION

63 Comments

FCLUlogoB2

BEWARE OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH & FUTURE

A COLLECTION OF CURRENT FAMILY COURT STORIES

Our divorce started in 1991, and finally ended in 2009. During that time I filed complaints against lawyers and judges for violating numerous laws and civil rights. The fraudulent acts, perjury and abuses within the divorce system were rampant. After going through the divorce, I could understand how all people can be skeptical about the entire legal system. Rather than talk about issues within the system that you must know are broken, let me list some ways that you can use to improve the system.

Allow complaints against lawyers while an action is ongoing. Now, the rules of the bar ethics committees usually will not pursue complaints while an action is ongoing and this only encourages lawyers to continue to violate RPC. When there are children and child support, actions go on for years and the abuses by lawyers continue.

Take the review of lawyers conduct away from members of the legal profession who do not police themselves adequately. I understand that there may be non-lawyers on the evaluation committee, but not a majority (use lawyers as advisors only.)

The same type of reviews and standards should be allowed against judges. Now, judges have almost absolute immunity. In those actions where judges can be sued, the actions are usually dismissed by other judges. I have observed judges act improperly and wagered with several other law students (at the time) that if I sat within a judges hearings for two weeks, I would find at least one violation of rules, cannons, law or behavior. I made that offer to one student whose father was a judge, and he refused to take up the wager.

Pass a law that will eliminate judicial immunity for other than executive, administrative, and legislative functions. The precursor of the civil rights laws (42 USC § 1983) allowed laws to be applied against judges (See the U.S. Supreme Court case Ex Parte Virginia – where a judge was jailed for excluding blacks from a jury.). Rotate judges out of specific courts with some exceptions. When judges and lawyers become familiar and friendly, abuses occur. More

The election of active domestic enemies

30 Comments

Marti Oakley  Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

_____________________________________________________________________

The greatest threats to our nation are active domestic enemies who now hold office. It is not some vague and undefined foreign terrorist who threatens us as a nation, as these people have no power to change our laws or to infringe on our Constitutional rights.  In fact, a foreign terrorist has no power over us at all unless we allow it.

Consider this:  We have started wars of aggression against various countries based on what are known lies and the current administration is continuing the wars of aggression and preparing to attack yet another country under false pretenses.

We have bombed, gassed, terrorized, intimidated and tortured the populations of these countries.  We have contaminated water resources, agricultural resources and devastated the land.  We have wiped out entire generations of families and held thousands hostage in black prisons; and these thousands included children.

Did any one of these countries begin an aggressive attack on their own people as a result of what we did?  Did they begin changing laws or creating laws that made criminals out of what remained of their populations?  Did any one of them turn their attention away from the actual attackers and focus it on their own people as if they had dropped the bombs?  As if they had caused the deaths and devastation?  Did they begin punishing and terrorizing their own people because we attacked them? More

Happy Thanksgiving: The farce in the food safety bills.

2 Comments

  by:  Paul Griepentrog  All rights reserved  Tell a Friend 

While we head into this Thanksgiving holiday we can all rest assured that the FDA and USDA have done their best to insure no one will get sick from the feast.  Of course we can be even more thankful that the US Senate is going to further the powers of these agencies to make our meal times even more secured.   These agencies are paid to insure our safety across a wide range of products.  They have done a fine job of that, with recalls going back several years and across a number of products.  Can we not, from the use of  failed self determining HACCP plans written by the companies themselves, along with the lack of authority of inspectors to close plants conclude that these agencies are then a failure in and of themselves and at the very root of the problem.

  Is it not possible that the situation now is worse than it was at the inception of these organizations?  In the writing of Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” we are shown a world run for the benefit of large companies, by exploiting labor, bribing officials, and more.  Today we are not appreciably different, only now multinational corporations buy their way through government with lobbyists, international trade agreements and the government agencies which utilize the scare tactics of contaminated food to further their empire building. More

%d bloggers like this: