Home

What’s Happening in Michigan?

Leave a comment

Update from Gretchen Rachel Hammond about Oakland Co. (MI) Probate Court which she investigated thoroughly for her five-part series, “The Fortress.” ( https://www.dailykos.com/…/-The-Fortress-Part-One-of-Five-U…).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From Gretchen: Good, sneaky and bad news.

It seems the guardians and judges at the Oakland County Probate Court have been doing a bit of house cleaning since August:

Elderly and developmentally disabled victims are getting moved out of unlicensed group homes.

Small refunds are being offered to victim family members on the proviso that they sign a form saying they received a refund for “accidental over billing.”

Guardians are trying to close out cases and get rid of their own assets (such as half million dollar homes).

Files in case dockets are being altered or removed (such as accounts, change of address forms and ex parte orders).

As of last week, the court’s only public access computer (the one my team and I used to research case files without paying $1-per-page) is gone.

So, the good: removal of victims from unlicensed group homes.

The sneaky: small refund as long as you agree to saying. “No worries. Small oops. Could have happened to anyone.”

The bad: destruction of evidence and hiding assets. If Dana Nessel was really investigating these crimes, one would imagine that such activity would be a naughty no-no.

#indictmentsnotinitiatives #explainyourselfdana

NOT WITHOUT MY MOTHER!!! A VICTIM’S STORY FROM MINNESOTA TO GREECE

Leave a comment

Joanna Bougalis

Website with full story:

https://sites.google.com/view/guardianshipjoannebougalis

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On May 2, 2016, my mother and I fled from her Minnesota guardian and Judge who collaborated with attorneys to create a guardianship based on a fraudulent diagnosis. The only thing wrong with my mother was that she had two sons that continually pursued her, at the expense of her life and her health, for control of her estate. As a result of family discord, the racketeers banded together to create a lucrative guardianship. After my mother suffered isolation and inappropriate drugging with the judge’s approval for almost two years, we determined the only way out was to run, and run we did! My mother and I are currently living in exile in Greece; the country she immigrated from.

Her guardian, Dan Lodahl, principle of First Fiduciary Corporation (City of Eagan) has many complaints against him. These complaints are well known throughout Minnesota, but are consistently and systematically ignored and hidden from the public.  Mr. Lodahl and his wife, Michelle Lodahl, use unethical billing practices while forcing wards to submit to their demands through false imprisonment, isolation, and inappropriate drug ingestion to promote unconsciousness and early death. Dan Lodahl is the Jared Shafer (Nevada) of Minnesota: untouchable.

My mother recently told a reporter, “When my husband died, everyone came after me just because they could. I had a life, a home, money; they took everything.”  Family members, attorneys, a physician, a Judge, a guardian and assisted living facility staff perpetrated incomprehensible cruelty against my mother and I.  We are law abiding citizens, professionals in our field, that are now fugitives seeking refuge from criminals.

For three years, as the guardian and judge fraudulently denied knowledge of my mother’s whereabouts, my mother was completely dependent on my VA disability for all her living and medical expenses.   The guardian continued to bill her estate thousands of dollars for his salary and expenses that he created without a ward in his jurisdiction. The guardian did everything in his power to deny my mother’s request for her social security income, which she finally received in 2019. He had, and has, no concern for the welfare of ‘his ward.’  She is simply a cash cow.

Despite notifications to the guardian of his ward’s location, he and the judge continue to declare her as missing hoping to make it to the four-year requirement in Minnesota that allows them to designate a missing person as deceased (Death in Absentia). This would give them faster access to her estate in probate court, which they can utilize to deplete her entire estate to fill their own pockets.

Although we are free, we will never truly be free. After a lifetime of dedication to her work, and carefully saving for her future security and that of her children, my mother cannot afford to live the life she worked for. She lost everything to guardianship. I lost everything to save her. Our losses are much deeper than financial; we cannot spend our senior years with our children and grandchildren and we cannot live the life we planned. We live in constant fear of being pursued. We are forced to live a life in exile while unwillingly relinquishing control of my parent’s estate and family legacy. We cannot return to the United States or I will be sentenced to jail and my mother will be forced back into human trafficking.

Currently, the only way out of guardianship is to let the racketeers steal your estate, accept defeat, and escape the country to regain your freedom – your life.

 

Abolishing probate: Ignorance of the law and Administrative “Star Chamber” Tribunals

9 Comments

Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Star Chambers

“2. any tribunal, committee, or the like, which proceeds by arbitrary or unfair methods.

Is this not the definition of today’s administrative tribunals called “probate”?

They also have unlimited power to collude with attorneys, guardians, agencies and other interested parties to make sure the hearing limits any relevant objections, evidence or statements that might adversely affect the outcome of what has been agreed to behind the scenes.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is a maxim of law, that you cannot claim ignorance of the law as any form of defense against the hundreds of thousands of laws, regulations, codes, statutes, rules and other contrivances created not to just confuse the average person, but to leave them utterly speechless at the mountains of many times nonsensical, contorted, twisted and perverted and torturous records of what is supposed to comprise our government and justice system and keep order. The lunatics are in fact, running the asylum.

The Fallacy of Judicial Immunity

Remember when they were grilling Samuel Alito prior to his confirmation for SCOTUS? I watched those hearings as he was asked repeatedly; “Will you uphold stare decisis”? Of course I had to find out why that was so important to the panel. Simply put, it means issues already settled whether they were Constitutional or not.

Stare decisis is Latin for “to stand by things decided.” In short, it is the doctrine of precedent.

Courts cite to stare decisis when an issue has been previously brought to the court and a ruling already issued. According to the Supreme Court, stare decisis\promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and consistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process.” In practice, the Supreme Court will usually defer to its previous decisions even if the soundness of the decision is in doubt. (emphasis, mine) Read more HERE:

According to the court? Really? Well, according to me , a non-lawyer, on its face this is null and void as each case is to be decided on its own merits. Instead of adhering to actual law, they revert to previous cases that many times are clear violations of law in the court’s rulings and decisions. They call it “precedence”. I call it malfeasance for starters.

Malfeasance defined: Intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful, especially by officials or public employees. Malfeasance is at a higher level of wrongdoing than nonfeasance (failure to act where there was a duty to act) or misfeasance (conduct that is lawful but inappropriate). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/malfeasance

Under 42 USC 1983: State officers may be held personally liable for damages under 1983 based upon actions taken in their official capacities. Pp. 3-10.

; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. https://www.casebriefs.com

See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. “When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.

But what about these Administrative Executive Appointees and elected Administrative judges?

More

Dis-honest Lawyers, Judges and Government

2 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25

Robert Gettinger

 

 

10252043_631709193589576_7022154908430043279_n

FAMILY LAW PROFESSIONALS – SPECIAL OFFER FROM FCLU!

3 Comments

FCLUlogoB2

Get the New FCLU Family Law Business Development Mobile App – Free!!

*(Android & IOS7 Platforms Only)

It’s the only app that determines the location of crony family law judges and adversary’s lawyers and triangulates you all to the nearest coffee shop, country club or bar for ex parte communications and client bashing while you plan new conflicts to steal family assets, college and retirement funds.

AND…If you sign up immediately, it comes with our free, proprietary spinner board function that helps you select the

False Accusation of the Day(TM)

with pre-loaded accusations spanning:

  • alcoholism,
  • drug abuse,
  • prostitution,
  • pedophilia,
  • mental illness and
  • many other made up accusations.

Your “Experts” will remember you fondly during the next holiday season!

GET IT TODAY and BUILD YOUR BU$INESS!!
(Remember – It’s Conflict for CASH)

FAMILY LAW – THE BRILLIANT RACKET(TM)

*Limited Time Only for the Holidays – Happy Holidays!!

*Offer Valid to Lying, Collusive & Fraudulent Lawyers, Judges & “Experts” Only – But Everywhere!

*Android and IOS7 Are Registered Trademarks of Google & Apple Respectively

*Cash Value of Offer = 1/10 of 1 Cent. Offer Valid Until 12/10/13

Contact Us TODAY!!

Families Civil Liberties Union
www.fclu.org

Copyright © FCLU, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

FCLU

PO BOX 1011New York, NY 10036
Add us to your address book

SHORT STORIES OF “FAMILY” COURT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION

63 Comments

FCLUlogoB2

BEWARE OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH & FUTURE

A COLLECTION OF CURRENT FAMILY COURT STORIES

Our divorce started in 1991, and finally ended in 2009. During that time I filed complaints against lawyers and judges for violating numerous laws and civil rights. The fraudulent acts, perjury and abuses within the divorce system were rampant. After going through the divorce, I could understand how all people can be skeptical about the entire legal system. Rather than talk about issues within the system that you must know are broken, let me list some ways that you can use to improve the system.

Allow complaints against lawyers while an action is ongoing. Now, the rules of the bar ethics committees usually will not pursue complaints while an action is ongoing and this only encourages lawyers to continue to violate RPC. When there are children and child support, actions go on for years and the abuses by lawyers continue.

Take the review of lawyers conduct away from members of the legal profession who do not police themselves adequately. I understand that there may be non-lawyers on the evaluation committee, but not a majority (use lawyers as advisors only.)

The same type of reviews and standards should be allowed against judges. Now, judges have almost absolute immunity. In those actions where judges can be sued, the actions are usually dismissed by other judges. I have observed judges act improperly and wagered with several other law students (at the time) that if I sat within a judges hearings for two weeks, I would find at least one violation of rules, cannons, law or behavior. I made that offer to one student whose father was a judge, and he refused to take up the wager.

Pass a law that will eliminate judicial immunity for other than executive, administrative, and legislative functions. The precursor of the civil rights laws (42 USC § 1983) allowed laws to be applied against judges (See the U.S. Supreme Court case Ex Parte Virginia – where a judge was jailed for excluding blacks from a jury.). Rotate judges out of specific courts with some exceptions. When judges and lawyers become familiar and friendly, abuses occur. More

The election of active domestic enemies

30 Comments

Marti Oakley  Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

_____________________________________________________________________

The greatest threats to our nation are active domestic enemies who now hold office. It is not some vague and undefined foreign terrorist who threatens us as a nation, as these people have no power to change our laws or to infringe on our Constitutional rights.  In fact, a foreign terrorist has no power over us at all unless we allow it.

Consider this:  We have started wars of aggression against various countries based on what are known lies and the current administration is continuing the wars of aggression and preparing to attack yet another country under false pretenses.

We have bombed, gassed, terrorized, intimidated and tortured the populations of these countries.  We have contaminated water resources, agricultural resources and devastated the land.  We have wiped out entire generations of families and held thousands hostage in black prisons; and these thousands included children.

Did any one of these countries begin an aggressive attack on their own people as a result of what we did?  Did they begin changing laws or creating laws that made criminals out of what remained of their populations?  Did any one of them turn their attention away from the actual attackers and focus it on their own people as if they had dropped the bombs?  As if they had caused the deaths and devastation?  Did they begin punishing and terrorizing their own people because we attacked them? More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: