Home

An ACT: Anything the government does by force that violates your individual rights

1 Comment

We are already there!  any time a bill is entitled “an ACT” it is a clear signal that what congress is about to do will violate individual rights by FORCE! the ACT will violate your protections under the Constitution and will be enforced by law enforcement and agency personnel who are more than willing to participate in violating your rights.  These are Americans turning on other Americans for reasons I will never understand.

 

Dave Frank: Give every person a voice!

Leave a comment

new-logo25Dave Frank
Author of: 300 Million Minds Changing America Piece by Peace

Explains a plan to give every person a voice in your community. Check out the plan at onevoicenow.org/video

Save

Sandy Hook Shooting Narrative To Be Front-and-Center at Dem Convention

1 Comment

Maybe we should allow victims of the illegal wars to sue military contractors for the deaths of more than a million. Or how about we sue medical schools that train doctors who mistreat their patients and cause harm and death? OR! How about we let victims of drunk drivers sue alcohol beverage manufacturers for contributing to the deaths of so many. This could be a real gold mine if we work it right! Yipppee!

Protect Your Right to Use the MN Vaccine Conscientiously Held Belief Exemption Without Obstructions!

23 Comments

Minnesota

The issue about whether vaccine science is safe and effective is a secondary issue.

The primary issue is about who makes vaccines and why they really want to force us to inject their vaccines in our bodies. That is something you need to know before the vaccine compliance SWAT team knocks on your door. Dees_Vaccines

http://vaccineworldsummit.com/summit-experts/

Minnesota S.F.380 Vaccine bill has a Senate Hearing Wednesday March 18th!

Oppose S.F. 380 NOW!

Click Here and Immediately Write to Committee Members and OPPOSE the bill!
If you have already written, WRITE AGAIN!
When you take action your email will automatically be sent to all of the Committee Members of the Health and Human Services and Housing in the Senate as well as the Committee Members of House Health and Human Services Reform. Their names and contact info will appear on your screen to confirm that you have taken action. Please use this info and call the Senate Committee members and leave a message to vote NO on S.F.380.

►Come to the hearing
Wednesday March 18, 2015
12 Noon – 1:30pm and then again at 5:00pm into the evening

Because S.F.380 is near the end of the agenda, it may not be heard until after 5pm, but no way of knowing yet. We will let you know if and when we know more.

Committee on Health, Human Services and Housing
Chair: Sen. Kathy Sheran
Room 15 Capitol

►Sign up to Testify
Email the Committee Administrator to testify
chelsea.magadance@senate.mn
S.F. 380/H.F. 393 are bills attempting to impose barriers on parents before they exercise their fundamental right to decline vaccines under MN’s legal exemptions!

HF. 393 authors: Immunization exemption procedures modified.
Freiberg ; Ward ; Schultz ; Liebling ; Halverson ; Simonson ; Carlson
; Bernardy ; Murphy, E. ; Yarusso ; Fischer ; Loeffler ; Erhardt ; Davnie
; Rosenthal ; Kahn ; Isaacson ; Slocum ; Uglem

Minnesota S.F. 380/H.F. 393 seeks to make opting out of childhood vaccinations more difficult for MN parents. Under current law, parents can opt children out of vaccination for medical reasons if approved by doctors, or because they hold conscientiously held beliefs if they present notarized forms to their schools. But, SF 380/HF 393 would require those parents to first talk to a Physician and obtain a statement from the physician verifying that the physician has reviewed with the parent information about the risks and benefits of the vaccines that is consistent with information published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.(emphasis, mine.  This is the last place I would go for relevant information on vaccines.)

Please help stop this attempt to set up hurdles for parents before they exercise their fundamental rights to direct the health choices and wellness path of their children. Click Here to Take Action by putting in your zip code and sending an automatic message to your legislator and the Committee Members NOW!
Click Here to read the bill introduced on January 29, 2015 and referred to the Senate Health, Human Services and Housing Committee and to the House Health and Human Services Reform Committee.

Take Action Here.

THE KINGDOM

1 Comment

strip banner
new-logo25Author, Chuck Frank
lightofthenation.us

________________________________________________

“Americans have reestablished the very sort of power that the Constitution most centrally forbade. Administrative law is extra-legal in that it binds Americans not through law but through other mechanisms—not through statutes but through regulations—and not through the decisions of courts but through other adjudications.” __________________________________________

Twas the day before Christmas and all through the castle not a
creature was stirring not even a vassal. More

H.R. 3188: The groundwork for denying access to the courts on all levels

9 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley        © copyright 2014 All rights reserved

________________________________________________________________

If H.R. 3188 passes and is signed into corporate contracting law and then converted to a public law, it will be used as a precedence for future obstruction of the public, by corporate federal agencies, to prevent access to the judicial system for remedy against federal encroachment.  More

Historic Supreme Court ruling allows the Sacketts to fight EPA takeover of their land

16 Comments

Submitted by: Heather Gass

——————————————————————————–

March 21, 2012

Contact:
Damien M. Schiff                                 James S. Burling
Director of Litigation                          Principal Attorney
Pacific Legal Foundation                   Pacific Legal Foundation

“This is a great day for Mike and Chantell Sackett, because it confirms that EPA can’t deny them access to justice. EPA can’t repeal the Sacketts’ fundamental right to their day in court.”

— Damien M. Schiff,
PLF Principal Attorney
WASHINGTON D.C.; March 21, 2012: In a precedent-setting victory for the rights of all property owners, the United States Supreme Court today held that landowners have a right to direct, meaningful judicial review if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency effectively seizes control of their property by declaring it to be “wetlands.” More

CPUC and PG&E: Misinformation, misrepresentation and attempted extortion

9 Comments

 

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

_________________________________________________________

The recent California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) public meeting in which one resident was told he could have his analog meter re-installed and the SMART Meter removed has resulted in CPUC saying that they would render a ruling on “allowing” citizens to opt out of the system of by 2012.  The idea that CPUC continues to misrepresent their authority and that of PG&E is astounding.  The thought that the California legislature and its governor sit idly by, silent, while this travesty takes place against the citizens of their state, is downright disgusting. 

Neither CPUC nor PG&E has the right or the authority to violate private property and the rights associated with that, not to mention the assault and violation of the individuals in their persons or bodies.  Neither do either of these corporations have the right to summarily and arbitrarily subject the citizenry to the provisions of a private contract they were not party to, and to force them to surrender or submit to what is in fact, a specifically designed military weapon( Bioeffects of selected non-lethal weapons pdf.) that can cause massive harm to the public.

Both CPUC and PG&E are operating under contract law.  There are several points that must be adhered to under this system.

  • All contracts must be in-kind.  Meaning corporation to corporation, or people to people, etc..
  • Must have “wet-ink” signatures.  This means assumed signatures or copies of signatures are not recognized as valid.
  • Equal consideration must be given to all parties.
  • There must be full disclosure.
  • Cannot be unconscionable or deceptive.  More

We can’t trust our own government

44 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

__________________________________________

In order for this new, soon to be created agency to be able to track and control who produces food of any kind, either this new government corporation or HSD, will pull in the twelve agencies now supposedly overseeing food production. Now it all makes sense and the pieces all begin falling into place.  

_____________________________________________

While many individuals and groups have waged a constant and frustrating battle against the coming total seizure and control of food production as practiced by family farmers and ranchers historically, several questions have gone unanswered.  The biggest of all of course is, why? 

Common sense, combined with critical and analytical thinking, cannot produce a rational answer for the onslaught of legislation, expansion of government agencies known for their incompetence and waste, and the complicity of state governments.  

What is this all about?   More

Vaccine manufacturers: What a friend you have in SCOTUS

5 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All rights Reserved

__________________________________________

“The 1986 law was passed as a protection to one of the largest contributors to political campaigns. It was a specially designed program that removed the right to enter into state or federal court and to sue for damages as a result of mandatory vaccinations which even in 1986 were known to cause more harm than good. “

_________________________________________

In what should come as no surprise to anyone who has watched as the Supreme Court routinely renders rulings which are clearly protective of corporate interests, another “opinion”, one clearly meant to protect big pharma from being held even remotely liable for the harm and damage caused by toxic vaccines, was just handed down. In a majority opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court ruled the federal law preempted all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers. These would be the design defects that kill people, cause autism, neurological damage and lifetime physical impairment.

Apparently Justice Scalia is unaware that no law can be enacted which abrogates your individual rights.  Any law that attempts to deprive you of your rights is null and void on its face as if it had never been.  Actually, Scalia doesn’t really care and has routinely issued opinions that are written as if he is living in some other universe where he makes up his own laws and then decides they are real. More

Revisiting Conflicts of interest: Revoking the corporate charters of state agencies

13 Comments

 
By: Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2010-11  All Rights Reserved
1320-281-0585
 
Republished per reader requests:
______________________________________________

In each and every state, incorporated agricultural agencies and their agents have enacted and enforced rules and regulations specifically designed and enforced to interfere with the prospective economic advantage of private producers.  No where is this more apparent than in the efforts by the state agricultural agency corporations to act under “the color of law” against milk producers; setting arbitrary standards and requirements and granting themselves the authority to;

__________________________________________________

One issue seemingly untouched by the all the legal eagles out there who claim to be defending independent and family ranchers and farmers is, the conflict of interest with intent to benefit between the state corporations (in every state) operating as “Departments of Agriculture” and private and individual farmers and ranchers who are being prosecuted and persecuted as these state owned corporations are empowered to make their own laws to benefit their own interests and to enforce those laws with full knowledge that constitutional rights and protections have been fraudulently eliminated for the sovereign individuals. More

DEFEND FOOD SOVEREIGNTY IN YOUR STATE!

6 Comments

From Paul Griepentrog, Randy Cook and Jessica Bernier

________________________________________________

“The ins and outs of this are complex, and with having to deal with all the various attacks on our Liberty, I find myself facing the situation, where it’s hard to focus on the fact you are trying to drain the swamp, when you are up to your ass in alligators!”

_______________________________________________

Copy & Print: More

Such a well behaved herd of sheep you are! TSA thanks you for allowing them to violate your rights and to assault you

19 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

1-320-281-0585

_______________________________________________

Who knowingly takes employment that would encompass the groping of the private and genital areas of not only adults, but also children?  And then smiles and tells you it was to “keep you safe”.  How sick is that?  More

Homeland Security: If you won’t let us look at you naked or sexually assault you…..you must be a terrorist!

4 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

_____________________________________________

And, may you hang your head in shame for submitting willfully to this unnecessary invasion and intrusion to your person while you made excuses for those committing these crimes, while many others stood up and defended not only  themselves, but by extension….you.  More

Is It Time In Virgina?

1 Comment

Lynn Swearingen (c) copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Most Friday nights people head on over to Jimmy’s Old Time Tavern to take in the “local flavor” according to the bloated heavy text website “Virginia Living” just beggin’ y’all to come see this little suburb of D.C.

Before one considers this fun little jaunt, reflection upon how Virgina’s obscure little rules concerning Tavern behavior might affect the patrons and employees is in order.

1. You might be pulled out of Jimmy’s to prove your sobriety at whim. Apparently this popular practice began in 2003. After all, pulling patrons out of a Tavern looking for someone intoxicated instead of actually following them on the highway where they might be driving drunk is such a good plan.

As the designated driver in her dinner party, Pat Habib was careful to consume no more than one alcoholic drink and follow it up with two sodas.

So she was shocked when a police officer singled her out of the crowd at Jimmy’s Old Town Tavern in Herndon and asked her to step outside to prove her sobriety. After she ran through the alphabet without pause, the Fairfax County police officer let her go and explained police had received a complaint about an unruly blond woman matching her description. Then she watched as police tested other women looking nothing like her. More

CAFTA’s extreme guarantees on foreign investor rights

Leave a comment

 

This week in Washington, D.C., in a closed World Bank hearing, a multinational mining corporation is arguing the first CAFTA environmental attack case. Using the controversial CAFTA investor rights rules that allow private firms to directly sue governments for policies they claim undermine their expected future profit, Pacific Rim Mining Corp is demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from El Salvador.

That’s right. Because of CAFTA’s extreme guarantees on foreign investor rights, this Canadian mining multinational can demand massive compensation from this small impoverished country. President Obama can help end this nightmare by fulfilling his pledge to purge extreme investor rights from U.S. trade policy and future trade pacts like the Transpacific Partnership (TPP), Obama’s first prospective trade deal, which will be negotiated in San Francisco later this month. More

The 100 Years War: Collectivism vs. Individualism

Leave a comment

By David McKalip, M.D.
View all 14 articles by David McKalip, M.D.
Published 04/22/10

Americans are caught in a war and it is time to choose sides or be prepared to live with the consequences. In this war there are two sides vying for victory: the forces of collectivism and the forces of individualism. Those Americans who plan to wait out the results and live with the fallout should think twice since the victor will have a profound influence on their lives. That is because the collectivists seek to control every aspect of the lives of every American and every person on the planet. The individualists wish only to win control over the degree of power possessed by government and wish no control over the lives of Americans — no power, no money, no special place in the economy. They want to ensure government remains constitutionally limited and creates the proper environment for peace and prosperity. Individualists know that when people have maximum freedom and government confines itself to the most basic functions, that the impacts of man’s most negative aspects are minimized and that society and the individuals in it reach their maximum potential. In other words, individualists seek to liberate man and collectivists seek to control man. I am fighting with the individualists. More

American Rally for Personal Rights

Leave a comment

www.americanpersonalrightsrally.org
www.americanpersonalrights.org

Vaccination Choice * Parental Consent

We believe in the rights to life, liberty, and personal security for ourselves and our children.

We demand the universal human rights standard of informed consent for all medical interventions. Compulsory vaccination cannot be legally and morally justified.

We affirm
the sanctity of personal space,
the right to be left alone, and
the freedom to make personal health care decisions guided by the professionals of our choosing.

We invite all people, families and organizations committed to protecting these fundamental rights to stand with us in downtown Chicago on May 26, 2010 at our inaugural rally, and to work with us after the rally to support grassroots advocacy, education, and leadership in defense of our personal –
individual, legal, moral, religious, civil, and human— rights.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

3:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

Grant Park
Downtown Chicago

www.americanpersonalrightsrally.org
www.americanpersonalrights.org More

American Liberty vs. the UN’s Sustainable Development Program

Leave a comment

AMERICAN POLITICS WITH JOHN WALLACE

RADIO SHOW – (THIS FRIDAY at 5:00PM)  NEW TIME

GUEST: TOM DeWEESE – from the AMERICAN POLICY CENTER

 
AMERICAN LIBERTY vs. the UN’s SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
 
My Guest this week is Tom DeWeese and we will be talking about the UN’s Agenda 21 and the concept of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Under the program designed by the UN, in Sustainable Development there can be no concern over individual rights – as we must all sacrifice for the sake of the environment. Individual human wants, needs, and desires are to be conformed to the views and dictates of social planners. Sustainable development is more about control of the people than it is about preserving the planet and most people do not know about it. It’s about puting Nature above Man; it’s about the redistribution of your wealth. People are encouraged to call in to ask a question or give us your thoughts. 
 
Please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326) and or email your questions or opinions to me in the Show’s Chat Room and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: john@TeaPartyRep.com (note the new email address – the previous one was just too long).

Regards,
John

Senator, shore up this wall!

Leave a comment

by: Dan Martin                             Tell a Friend 

“Out of respect for your elected position and as a personal courtesy to you, I will not post this as a public letter to the PPJ Gazette until Friday, next, allowing ample time for your response . . .”

You guessed it. I’ve had no response from Senator Gimse.

Yet.

Joe Gimse                                                
Minnesota State Senator
Assistant Minority Leader
District 13
State Office Building, Room 105
St. Paul MN 55155-1206

Senator Gimse:

This is in response to your Monday, November 23, 2009 Email, subject: Call for Americans to stand for sanctity of life, marriage, and religious freedom.

I am sure you will excuse its length, given the three pages of unconstitutional crapola you dropped into my Email in-box this morning.

In it, you refer to a “…statement, called “the Manhattan Declaration,” (that) has been signed by more than 125 Catholic, Evangelical Christian, and Orthodox leaders, . . .” Now there is an Appeal to Authority if ever one has been made.

And who but a fool would argue with: “a 4,700-word declaration addressing the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and religious liberty.”

It is that last part, about religious liberty, that concerns me. When will all of our government leaders – executive, judicial, and legislative – come to realize that the bedrock support for that “religious liberty” is spelled out in the Bill of Rights: More

Bush Illegally Turns Army Inwards

1 Comment

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26045

 

What would you do if you learned that President Bush was preparing – in violation of federal law – to use the U.S. military to maintain order within our borders?  I hope you would at least take one minute to help us raise awareness about the situation.

For more than 200 years, federal laws have protected the American people against the use of military forces on our own soil.  Strengthened in 1878 by the Posse Comitatus Act, these laws have guaranteed that the federal government could not use the military for domestic law enforcement purposes.*  

Without such protection, the federal government could use the might of our army to violate state and individual rights.  Moreover, minor incursions by the military into domestic law enforcement activity could lay the foundation for the imposition of martial law at a moment’s notice.  This is one slippery slope we don’t want to start sliding down.

That is why we should all be deeply disturbed by the news that President Bush has assigned the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team to be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army component of Northern Command (NorthCom).  According to an article in Army Times, the soldiers could be called upon for a variety of tasks, including quelling “civil unrest.”  They are apparently engaged in training with shields and batons, beanbag bullets, and Tasers.

We need to raise awareness about this threat to our liberty immediately.  The American Freedom Campaign believes the best method available at the moment is to send an email to the moderators of the next two presidential debates, urging them to ask the candidates whether they would fully enforce the Posse Comitatus Act.

Please join us in the effort by clicking on the following link:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26045

In just one minute, you can share your feelings with both Tom Brokaw at NBC and Bob Schieffer at CBS.  After you do so, please spread the word by forwarding this alert widely to friends and family or by using the Tell-A-Friend option that will appear on our site after you send your email.

Thanks so much for taking action on this important campaign.

Best,
Steve

Steve Fox
Campaign Director
American Freedom Campaign Action Fund

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26045

 

States Claiming Ownership of Newborn’s DNA

3 Comments

Unknown to most new parents, or those who became parents in the last ten or so years, DNA of newborns has been harvested, tested, stored and experimented with by all 50 states.  And all 50 states are now routinely providing these results to the Homeland Security Department. 

No doubt we can all see the benefits in testing for genetic disorders or genetic traits and tendencies that could be more adequately dealt with, in some cases actually deterring the onset of life-time illness, but that seems not to be the real thrust of these programs.  It may have been initially….but not now.

As with all good things, there are always those who seek the more evil path, in essence turning what should have been a life saving tool, a preventative measure into something insidious and inhumane.  This is what has happened to this national effort.

Here in Minnesota the state tests for 56 various genetic disorders and variants.  At least 1/3 of these tests produce a false positive meaning that a flaw was identified that actually did not exist.  Regardless, that false positive becomes part of the permanent record of the child and follows them for the rest of their lives as does any true positives.  This means that the child will eventually and most likely face discrimination in employment and the ability to gain health insurance at any cost.

There are other nagging problems with this system.  Although the national website

http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/  insists that this harvesting of DNA is a highly visible program, my own polling of parents of newborns, or the grand parents had no idea that this was being done to their children and grand children.  Further, not one knew that they had the right to demand the blood and tissue samples be destroyed after 45 days per written request.  Even had they known, and the samples were destroyed (you would have no way of knowing if they really were) the information gleaned from them would still be available and on file…..in perpetuity. 

Also unknown to at least the new parents in Minnesota, is that once that 45 days has lapsed, the state now claims that they “own” the DNA of that child.  This claimed ownership now allows the state health agency to test, tamper, alter, sell, farm out, and utilize in any way they see fit, the DNA of your newborn.  It can be manipulated, spliced with other DNA, and used in ways never intended under the screening program.

Now, there are forms that have to be signed that agree to this invasion of privacy, but the problem seems to be that this is not done during pre-natal care, but rather, at the time of delivery of the infant.  These forms are produced when the mother is ready to deliver and is being admitted to the hospital.  That’s when these “informed consent” forms are dragged out to be signed.  This is no accident.  Expectant parents simply sign what is put in front of them and are told they must sign to complete admission.  Nice, huh?  And none of them seems to be aware that what they are signing allows this right to have those additional blood and tissue samples destroyed.  No matter, the damage is done and the results of those three extra blood drops are forever recorded and along with it, a lot of genetic information about the parents.

Although this is supposed to be an opt-in program, rather than an “opt-out”, Minnesota has decided to interpret the law differently.  Our legislators have decided that opting out is the way it should be…..regardless of the law.  With that in mind they have gone one step further and declared that if the parent doesn’t specifically opt out….they are presumed to have “informed consent” and have opted in. 

I have to give the special interests in Minnesota their dues.  Federal law and the courts have upheld the concept that human DNA cannot be patented.  But these fine folks, representing insurance companies, medical institutions, and big pharma have found a way around that bothersome ruling.  Using a compliant legislature they have made sure a system has been put in place that allows them to indirectly access what should be the most private of all information, the most identifiable information concerning an individual and in the case of medical and pharmaceuticals, to use it in any way they see fit once the state claims ownership. 

In January 2007, a lady named Twila Brase president of the Citizens Council on Healthcare, issued a written testimony to the Minnesota legislature on the unethical and hidden uses of harvested DNA by the state.  The 18 page document can be located at

http://www.oah.state.mn.us/cases/health4615/nbs-pc8.pdf    

It is an eloquent treatise on the misuse of the DNA testing and the right of parents to be fully informed of what is really afoot in these programs. 

Currently, we have a monumental effort under way by Sue Jeffers to petition the state to;

Oppose illegal State government ownership of the blood, DNA and genetic test results of newborn citizens in Minnesota.  http://www.cchconline.org/petition/babyDNA2007.php  

In July 1997, solely by an executive decision of health officials-no lawthe MN Department of Health began retaining the DNA-filled blood specimens of all newborn babies.

The State now claims ownership rights to the DNA of more than 670,000 children (approx.70,000 births/yr).

In July 1986, MDH began cataloging the genetic test results of all Minnesota children. Approximately 1.4 million children are in the database.   

Oppose the dissemination of newborn blood and DNA to genetic researchers

Oppose the Minnesota Department of Health’s refusal to fully inform parents

Calls on Governor Tim Pawlenty to direct the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to comply with Minnesota state privacy law, to fully inform parents of the genetic testing process and their legal rights–and to dismantle MDH’s illegal warehouse of newborn citizen DNA. (Contact Sue Jeffers directly at: S1U2E3@aol.com )

I might suggest that each of you check the national website to determine how extensive the DNA testing is in your state, especially if you have children 10 years or younger.  What you find may sicken you.    

The idea of the state, any state, claiming ownership of the DNA of anyone, most especially newborn babies is so repugnant to me that I cannot find the words to express how offensive this is; what an unconscionable breach of humanity this comprises.  This issue is not one of party affiliation or a right vs. left drama being played out.  This is the groundwork for future discrimination that will most likely surpass employment and insurance targeting but eventually could be used to decide who lives or dies, or who can reproduce. 

There is however a level of humor in all the debating going on……insurance company reps along with those of the business sector assured everyone that these genetic tests will never be used to discriminate in employment or insurance coverage.  Now if that didn’t make you laugh, nothing will. 

But, all of us need to ask ourselves why this information would be of any use to Homeland Security?  What possible reason could they have for cataloging and storing the genetic code of any newborn child? 

In the end I find myself wondering where all these big religious fomenters are that railed against gay marriage, stem cell research, the right to choose for women and a host of other issues that would supposedly destroy the traditional American family.   Wouldn’t losing ownership of your child’s or your own DNA be far more devastating than these issues?  And yet, not one rock star preacher has spoken one word that I can find condemning this practice.  Not a peep!  It’s probably just a case of a lost message in all the speaking God does to them when he puts a “word of knowledge in their hearts” about the woes of society. 

My advice?  Find out what is happening in your own state and to what extent your state is testing and participating in this program that is so loaded with secret agendas and obviously in opposition to many state and federal laws.  Maybe what is needed is a class action lawsuit brought in each state by parents who were unaware that they or their children no longer own their own DNA.

     Marti Oakley  copyright 2008 

%d bloggers like this: