Home

NSA Spying vs. Trayvon Martin

8 Comments

strip banner

 new-logo25Marti Oakley

____________________________________________________________________

The Trayvon Martin case is being used as a national diversion so that the public will focus on the hyped up court case and not on Benghazi-gate, the IRS scandal or, the massive NSA illegal spying recently exposed by Edward Snowden, the whistleblower.

The concentration on the Martin v Zimmerman case was blown up, puffed up, hyped up and dutifullycensor kept in the headlines of every Lame Street Media outlet.   DOJ “peacekeepers” from the Community Outreach department, were sent in to help the public “organize” protests which LSM focused on and allowed issues of real importance such as the illegal spying by a rogue government agency to slide into the back ground.

This is very much like the CIA was sent into Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Lybia……to help people in those places (many of whom were bussed into the hot zones from parts unknown) “organize” the civil uprisings that overthrew the governments. More

Seattle Has Been Taken Over By The Department Of Homeland Security

4 Comments

strip banner

We recently published a revealing piece by Rebecca Em Campbell about the construction of a DHS surveillance state in the city of Seattle.  While many people expressed doubt about the accuracy of the article (none gave any particulars about what those inaccuracies might have been) the following article found on governmentslaves.info supports Ms. Campbell’s contentions that Seattle is under DHS surveillance and control. 

______________________________________________________________

govtslaves.info

govtslaves_png

 

(Montana Pike Hunter)  I’m writing to you today to bring light to share with you some curious things I noticed this weekend.

In order to put them into perspective, I must let you know a little about myself.  I was born in Seattle Washington and moved to Missoula Montana in July of 2001.  I still have friends in Seattle and I go there to visit yearly.

I went last year and observed a lot of peculiar infrastructure put in place, but nothing more noteworthy than the extremely sophisticated camera systems on the state borders.  This year I witnessed significantly more, a deterioration into an Orwellian setting that I never could have imagined.

Seattle is now informally under Federal Control.  Whether the local police and sheriff’s departments know it or not, they are being groomed to relinquish control to the Department of Homeland Security, it would appear that vast amounts of resources are being placed inside the city on standby.  I would have gladly taken more pictures, but given the circumstances, which I will explain later, I was unable to.

_________picture 1

Picture 1.  What you see here first, is a homeless man who got drunk and took a dive into the concrete.  What you can’t see to the left of the picture by the arrow, are 3 Department of Homeland Security vehicles which I will show later.  That’s right, our counter terrorist force is responding to domestic disturbances.  More

This is not sequestering.. This is a hi-jacking.

1 Comment

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley  (c)copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

_________________________________________________________

“We are being high-jacked by a pack of criminals, thugs and thieves who will make sure that we, the public, take the brunt of any “cuts”.  Those at the top of the income ladder, those who have the word “corporation” attached to their names and those who hold political office will not experience any “cuts”.  In fact, I doubt any of them could even bleed if they did.”

______________________________________________________________

This is a hi-jacking

 One of the great political battles composed only of partisan politics is unfolding right before our very eyes.  The battle over ending the massive over spending by both houses of congress and successive presidents has morphed into how badly either side can scare the public into submitting to the threats. And it will be21150explosion the public who will suffer.  Not the corporations.  Not the wealthy.  Not the politicians or the president.  It will be me and you and everyone you know.

Both sides are banking on how badly they can scare the general public into going along with, a) Increasing taxes on the wealthy and ending preferential treatment for corporations and continue spending like there is no tomorrow or, b) No tax increases and approximately 750,000 people losing their jobs and continue spending like there is no tomorrow.

While the average American can observe from the outside the massive expansion and waste in the federal government and can clearly see where cuts to any budget could reasonably be made, apparently those inside the Beltway suffer from severe tunnel vision.  That vision is focused squarely on their bank accounts and campaign war chests.  This is important! It is these funds that allow them to retain these lucrative, albeit criminal, offices they occupy.

There is absolutely no chance that wasteful government spending will end under either option.  The public is being treated like pawns in a grossly politically charged war between two factions of the one party system in the District of Criminals. More

Our biggest waste of money is Congress

8 Comments

new-logo25Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

******************************************************************************************

Our biggest waste of money is Congress

Several of you have written me and said things to the effect that if I am so damn smart why don’t I tell you all how I would fix the national debt and reduce spending in the District of Criminals.  So, as my New Year’s gift to all of you, here is my idea of how to rid ourselves of massive amounts of national debt and reduce theinfo 2 mindless, pork laden spending done at our expense. It is not a full and complete list as this would require so much space and days of reading, that I am only highlighting three or four of the most wasteful, unconstitutional, pointless agency’s or programs.

And, no I do not think I am so smart.  I do however, think that I am highly pissed off that we allow this crap to continue.

How the Fed gets in your state

The one thing that must be understood is that the only way federal corporations who try to hide their true identity by masquerading as “Public service” or some other clever word exchange, gain access to your state is only by getting approval from your governor and directed to the corresponding agency within the state that will contract with them.  These are not laws as per the Constitution.  This is contract law and the ensuing contracting with the federal corporation attempting to gain entry into your state is a corporate business plan which has little to nothing to do with law or property rights.  These are contracts that can be revoked, and, these are business plans that should be rejected across the board.

The first order of business:

1.  I would close down and completely disassemble Homeland Security.  This monolithic monstrosity has nothing to do with national security, keeping you safe or any of the other idiotic jingoistic crap that issues from them on a daily basis.  The Economist published a wonderfully explicit graph  in September of 2011 showing the cash sink hole that is Homeland Security.  More

WHY SCHOOL AND OTHER MASS SHOOTINGS CONTINUE TO BE SUCCESSFUL

6 Comments

strip banner

new logoby James Roger Brown

Sociologist, Intelligence Collection and Analysis Methodologist

www.thesociologycenter.com

thesociologist@roadrunner.com

____________________________________________________________________

 “Second, Homeland Security is controlled by sociopathic homicidal maniacs who are also stockpiling ammunition to kill you using plans developed over the decades in elite evil think tanks and Pentagon high security scenario gaming rooms which produced Operation Northwoods and its clones.”

_____________________________________________________________

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” (Attributed to CIA Director William Casey during his first staff meeting.)

When my brother and I were the ages of some of the children shot at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut my parents were raising us to be pacifists and do nothing if someone hit us. That lasted until the son of a Minister beat up both of us and threw my brother and me into an open sewageGun-Control-Works-Pictures-e1342051099803 ditch. After that we were told that we would receive a spanking if we did not win a fight.

Neither my Parents nor anyone else taught my brother or me anything about how to defend ourselves and win a fight. In the early 1960s when I was 13 my Father was transferred from a job in Ohio to Memphis, Tennessee where I was assaulted in school on a regular basis for being a “Yankee bastard.” I have intimate personal knowledge and scars of the consequences of not teaching your child how to effectively deal with violence.

I did not acquire any practical skills of self-defense until Basic Training in the United States Army. I subsequently acquired more advanced self-defense skills because of the areas of sociology I chose to specialize in. I have some practical understanding of the value that learning how to deal with both large and small scale violence can have. The most valuable skills I acquired are in the identification and use of improvised weapons.

The special tragedy of the success of all these mass killings is that, unless you are physically paralyzed or restrained, you are never defenseless. Your ignorance, stupidity and inaction may get you killed, but at no time are you defenseless even when at a disadvantage. If you cannot think of anything else, the shoes on your feet can be thrown to distract a shooter. If you are in a theater with sixty other people and someone starts shooting, that is 120 shoes the shooter would have to dodge while those closest to them could take them down and disarm them. As President George Bush demonstrated for the entire World at his December 14, 2008 Iraq Press Conference, you cannot stay focused on lying, or doing anything else, when you have shoes flying in your face. More

Obama & Panetta v The US Constitution

5 Comments

Marti Oakley     © Copyright 2012     All Rights Reserved  **See Reservations below.

_______________________________________________________________________

Will the real terrorists please stand up?

Barack Obama, Chief Executive of the corporation operating as “The United States”, has joined forces with Leon Panetta, head of the Department of Defense in attempting to have the May 15th, 2012 ruling of Judge Katherine B Forest overturned. Judge Forest issued a 69 page ruling regarding the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) . This was the legislative attack on several constitutional rights and protections passed by Democrats and Republicans alike in 2011. On December 31, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the 2012 act into law. The May 15 ruling temporarily blocks the NDAA, and section 1021 in particular.

In June the Obama Administration contacted Judge Forest and demanded that she reverse her ruling of May 15. The Judge refused. The government’s argument was that the plaintiff’s who were afraid of being disappeared into the abyss of the police state, had no standing because the government had not yet kidnaped them and stashed them away never to be heard from again. Which of course would have solved any problems associated with future lawsuits as once they were disappeared there is no way they would ever see the light of day in a court room to establish their “standing”.

Section 1021 of the law allows for detention of citizens and permanent residents taken into custody in the U.S. by military or Homeland Terrorism agents on “suspicion of providing substantial support” to people engaged in hostilities against the U.S.

It appears obvious to me that those engaged in hostilities against the US reside inside the District of Criminals. It seems that no one is more hostile to, or more engaged in hostile activities against the nation than the very agencies and government agents that the NDAA empowers.

How could an unconstitutional law such as this, have been passed unless those voting for it were actively and openly hostile towards the country and people who would be affected by it? That would be the House and Senate and the target would be us, the citizens.

Who are the real terrorists here? More

The UN Small Arms Treaty: Negotiating with an enemy

11 Comments

Marti Oakley     © Copyright 2012     All Rights Reserved  **See Reservations below.
 _______________________________________________________________________

On May 3rd, 1994, then President Clinton signed Presidential Directive 25 (PDD-25).  This directive placed US military commanders under the jurisdiction of the United Nations if the UN was conducting an action of some kind, anywhere.  The actual text of the directive remains sealed and classified.

PDD25 was originally written as PDD-13.  The re-write of PPD-13 and conversion to PDD-25 was needed to exclude a disclaimer from General Colin Powell, the 1993 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  This disclaimer made certain that US commanders would not have to comply with UN orders which were:

  • Outside the mandate of the mission or,
  • illegal under US law or,
  • militarily imprudent or unsound.

PDD-25 of course, removed these provisions.

#25 also makes no distinction as to where UN meddling might be taking place, and no provision was included to exclude any actions by the UN within the geographical United States.  What may keep the UN and its “peacekeeping forces” out of the US is that if they show up here, they will not get a glowing reception.  No one would be happy to see them and we would not greet them with flowers and garlands, nor would we cheer their arrival.  It is however, a distinct possibility that they would be greeted with massive amounts of fireworks.  And that appears to be a long-standing concern for those dedicated to disarming the world so that only they and their armies have weapons.  It makes overtaking one country after another so much easier if you are the only one who is armed. More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: