Home

Medical Doctors Across the U.S. Speak Out Against Mandatory Vaccination Laws

1 Comment

Health Impact News

Doctors

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

One of the myths propagated by the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media is that medical doctors are united in their support of mandatory vaccination laws.

This is simply not true. The medical doctors and physician groups that have taken a stand against mandatory vaccination laws are almost never interviewed in the corporate media, and if they are referred to at all, they are called “quacks.”

The largest medical association in the world is the American Medical Association (AMA), which has strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry and probably represents more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than any other trade group.

And yet, less than 25% of the licensed medical doctors in the United States are members of the AMA, down from 75% in the late 1950s.

So it would be incorrect to believe that the AMA represents the views of most of the physicians in the U.S. They do not.

Two other medical associations have come out with statements against mandatory vaccinations in the past couple of days, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and Physicians for Informed Consent.

You will not likely find their views expressed in the corporate-sponsored media outlets dominated by Big Pharma advertising revenues, and you will not see any of them invited to testify in any government hearings to discuss vaccination legislation.

AAPS-logotagline_web

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) just issued a press release this week:

Forced Vaccination Unnecessary, Violates Human Rights, States Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

More

Advertisements

Dangers of Gardasil Vaccine: Mom? Dad? Did you know??

1 Comment

Vaccine Impact

Merck Fighting Fraud Lawsuits in U.S. Courts on MMR and Gardasil Vaccines

Government Vaccine Court Concedes Death by Gardasil Vaccine Case After 8 Years

Read the entire final decision here.

Read More HERE!

 

Active Senior Medically Kidnapped from her Home and Forced onto Drugs in Nursing Home Now Near Death

3 Comments

Health Impact News:  Medical Kidnap

Beverly_Finnegan-768x576

Earlier this year, Beverley Finnegan, age 69, of Newton, Massachusetts, could walk, talk, and discuss the events from the daily newspaper. That was before she was seized from the condo that she shared with her sister. Police and “Elder Protective Services” social workers literally broke down her door to enter her residence, and then forced her into a nursing home, and drugged her against her will. Years before, she had named her sister as her medical proxy, but the state of Massachusetts has ignored her wishes and placed her under guardianship with strangers. Her whole life, everything she had ever known, was gone with the stroke of a judge’s pen. Now, she is on life support, and on Monday, December 18, guardians and their attorneys petitioned the court in the attempt to have Beverley Finnegan euthanized. They go back to court on Friday, December 22. Janet Pidge is fighting for the very life of her beloved sister who is just one court decision away from having her life snuffed out forever.  Read more

See:

See our other coverage of medical kidnappings of senior citizens:

Medical Kidnapping of Baby Boomer Seniors Not Rare – Now the Norm

Medical Kidnapping of Seniors: A $273 BILLION Industry

Elder Medical Kidnapping in Texas Results in Abuse and Death of Elderly Mother

Husband of Retired Missouri Couple Medically Kidnapped – Estate Plundered to Pay for Unwanted Medical Confinement

95 Year Old WWII Vet Refuses to go to Hospital for Urinary Tract Infection, so Police Shoot and Kill Him

Adult Medical Kidnapping in New York: 1950s Air Force Veteran Held Hostage in Hospital 

CPS Using “Predictive Analytics” Software to Label Parents as Unfit, Even Before Baby is Born

2 Comments

Medical Kidnap

November 2, 2017 12:22 pm
Parents whose children have been taken from them by Child Protective Services often tell us that the system is backwards. Instead of being presumed innocent until proven guilty, everyone involved with CPS assumes guilt, even in the face of no evidence of guilt. Some jurisdictions are taking this presumption of guilt without evidence a frightening step further: they are using “predictive analytics” to see which parents MIGHT abuse or neglect their children in the future. In several cases reported to Health Impact News, we have already seen such allegations used against parents. Social workers have literally written in their reports to the courts that a parent has characteristics that might indicate that they may abuse or neglect their child in the future, even though there is no evidence that they have harmed their child in the past. This is reminiscent of George Orwell’s “thought police” in the dystopian novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is inconsistent with one of the foundational principles underlying the U.S. Constitution, that of the presumption of innocence. Some have equated the predictive analysis model with racial profiling, because the algorithms tend to disproportionately target people who are poor or part of a minority group. The National Coalition for Child Protection Reform recently addressed this alarming trend.
Read More…

 

%d bloggers like this: