Home

The American Taxpayer Gets Defrauded By The USDA In The Amount Of $400,000,000

1 Comment

 By: The Cowtown Foundation Inc.

Corey Lea

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The DC District Court, Judge Paul Friedman, has devised a plan with the Former Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, to defraud Taxpayers out of $400,000,000. The USDA entered into a deal to settle claims against Socially Disadvantaged Farmers. However, the Agency, USDOJ and Judge Friedman have breached the contract agreement. In short, there is $400,000,000 that is left from Congressional Funds that was appropriated for this settlement.

The ultimate goal was drive small farms out of business and to make sure the affected farmers were financially crippled, so that they could not defend their rights in any court of law. Congress mandated that the farmers that were class action members were entitled to a hearing before the USDA’s Administrative Law Judge. If successful, the farmer would receive full debt relief, which included the farm ownership loans. However, only one farmer out of 22,000 eligible farmers received debt relief of farm ownership loans. More

Advertisements

TS Radio..Abolishing Probate #4: Code of Judicial Conduct & Notice of Individual Liability

Leave a comment

Join us live October 16, 2017 at 7:00 pm CST!

 

5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST

Listen live HERE!

call in # 917-388-4520

Hosted by Marti Oakley and including Luanne Fleming, Robin Austin, Randall Stone and Brian Kinter. 

Join us this evening as Marti, Lulu, Robin, Randal and Brian take on the Code of Judical conduct.  These codes exist in each and every state and require little to no adherence.  For every rule established, it is quickly followed with a disclaimer that under certain circumstances, the rule can be ignored. And what if a “rule” gets in the way of judicial misconduct?  Why then you just change the meaning and terminology and keep right on violating the actual law and the rights of those who are unforutnate enough to be caught in this carefully constructed trap.

Administrative tribunals which are unconstitutional, do not follow rules of evidence or the code of federal procedure. and because these kangaroo “courts” are not courts of law, special statutes have been constucted to avoid your consitutional rights and liberties.

We will also be talking about the Notice of Individual Liability…this notice will state specifically that immunity applies only so long as the judge or administrator, guardian or attorney and even social service agents can be held individually liable once they step outside the law.  Abuse of power, abuse of official position, malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance that cause harm to the individual or public whose interests they are supposed to be protecting, removes any sheild of immunity.  You cannot sue in the offical judicial capacity, nor the agency, but you can sue the individual for abusing that position.

More later tonight….join us!  We are working hard to collapse this arbitrary and unlawful system!

 

Colorado’s Supreme Court has used its power to help itself – again.

1 Comment

The Judicial Integrity Project

Colorado’s Supreme Court has used its power to help itself – again. This time, it’s to wipe out an embarrassing 97% dismissal rate of complaints against judges.

By rewriting the rules for Colorado’s Commission on Judicial Discipline, the Supreme Court stops the incredulous 97% dismissal rate from continuing. The rate hit 97% in 1993 and has been 97% ever since – 24 years. But the Supreme Court has ensured the rate won’t continue.

How? By redefining “complaint.”

Under the new rules, a complaint will no longer be a complaint when a person files a complaint with the commission. A complaint will only be a “complaint” when the commission finds there are grounds to proceed. Before that point, what has been a complaint will now be called a “request for investigation.”

Requests for investigation won’t be dismissed. Those files will merely be closed if the commission finds there aren’t grounds to proceed. The 97% dismissal rate disappears into those closed files. Clever, huh?

So instead of spending valuable time hearing more cases that should be heard at the Supreme Court, or encouraging vigorous enforcement of the Code of Judicial Conduct, our justices spent time figuring out a crafty plan to cover their tracks.

Does this rule change make you feel confident in the Supreme Court justices? Does it make you think they’re being unfair? Does it seem like they’re using their power to help themselves?

More

Judicial Integrity Project: Get Your Code On!

2 Comments

Published on Oct 13, 2015

 

 

S 178… Probate is about to get far worse for families targeted

27 Comments

Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am not a lawyer, and have never represented myself as being one. I don’t need to be one. The Constitution for the United States makes very clear that the law is to be accessible to everyone. I cannot claim ignorance of the law as a defense for anything and there is no requirement for me or you to obtain a BAR union card in order to access and use the law, stated anywhere in the Constitution. “Practicing law without a license” is a fiction of law.

“By abdicating its responsibility to the public, congress has ceded its power to act on behalf of the people to the second largest BAR Association in the country….the Department of Justice. How do you think that is going to turn out for those of us out here in no man’s land? Do you really believe the DOJ is going to implement any rule, regulations, or other other fictions of law that would adversely affect other Bar members or associations? Not a rat’s chance in a deacon box that will happen.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

While many are applauding the provisions of S. 178: Robert Matava Elder Abuse Prosecution Act of 2017 I do not share this view.

Pay careful attention here to the word “ACT”. An ACT is something the government is going to do by force rather than by actual power granted to them in the Constitution. In this particular instance, congress is charging the DoJ with law making which is unconstitutional.

Those of us who have actually read the bill and have at least a modicum of understanding of how legislation actually works and affects us, know that this bill is going to cause irreparable harm not only to the elderly, but to those family members and others who have waged this battle against the growing human trafficking of the elderly by professional predators working in tandem with unethical attorney’s , corrupt probate administrators, Adult Protective Services agencies, and professional predators who prey on the elderly and others, and who make a parasitic living off the targeting of the elderly to profit themselves.

  • Did you see one word in this bill that addressed the issue of identity theft that results from being declared a ward of the state?
  • Is there one word about stopping the assumption of identity by the predators who now present themselves as the victim and begin bleeding the estate dry?
  • Was anything said about the resulting abuse, neglect and exploitation by professionals and agencies that results from this civil death? ( by declaring the living human being a “ward of the state”, the victim has suffered a civil death, equal in its legal consequences to natural death) You are dead in the law, but still breathing.
  • Was anything mentioned about holding these administrators liable for violating the rights of the targeted victim?
  • Did you see one word directing these probate tribunals to follow rules of evidence?
  • To cap fees?
  • To stop the predators from isolating the ward?
  • Anything about stopping chemical restraint to silence the victim?
  • Any sighting as criminal activity the actions by these predators who make their living stealing the lives of their victims for profit?

Are we really this ignorant? More

Abolishing probate: Ignorance of the law and Administrative “Star Chamber” Tribunals

9 Comments

Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Star Chambers

“2. any tribunal, committee, or the like, which proceeds by arbitrary or unfair methods.

Is this not the definition of today’s administrative tribunals called “probate”?

They also have unlimited power to collude with attorneys, guardians, agencies and other interested parties to make sure the hearing limits any relevant objections, evidence or statements that might adversely affect the outcome of what has been agreed to behind the scenes.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is a maxim of law, that you cannot claim ignorance of the law as any form of defense against the hundreds of thousands of laws, regulations, codes, statutes, rules and other contrivances created not to just confuse the average person, but to leave them utterly speechless at the mountains of many times nonsensical, contorted, twisted and perverted and torturous records of what is supposed to comprise our government and justice system and keep order. The lunatics are in fact, running the asylum.

The Fallacy of Judicial Immunity

Remember when they were grilling Samuel Alito prior to his confirmation for SCOTUS? I watched those hearings as he was asked repeatedly; “Will you uphold stare decisis”? Of course I had to find out why that was so important to the panel. Simply put, it means issues already settled whether they were Constitutional or not.

Stare decisis is Latin for “to stand by things decided.” In short, it is the doctrine of precedent.

Courts cite to stare decisis when an issue has been previously brought to the court and a ruling already issued. According to the Supreme Court, stare decisis\promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and consistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process.” In practice, the Supreme Court will usually defer to its previous decisions even if the soundness of the decision is in doubt. (emphasis, mine) Read more HERE:

According to the court? Really? Well, according to me , a non-lawyer, on its face this is null and void as each case is to be decided on its own merits. Instead of adhering to actual law, they revert to previous cases that many times are clear violations of law in the court’s rulings and decisions. They call it “precedence”. I call it malfeasance for starters.

Malfeasance defined: Intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful, especially by officials or public employees. Malfeasance is at a higher level of wrongdoing than nonfeasance (failure to act where there was a duty to act) or misfeasance (conduct that is lawful but inappropriate). https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/malfeasance

Under 42 USC 1983: State officers may be held personally liable for damages under 1983 based upon actions taken in their official capacities. Pp. 3-10.

; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. https://www.casebriefs.com

See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. “When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.

But what about these Administrative Executive Appointees and elected Administrative judges?

More

American Horror Story: The Shameful Truth About the Government’s Secret Experiments

Leave a comment

American Horror Story: The Shameful Truth About the Government’s Secret Experiments

The Rutherford Institute

www.rutherford.org

NOW PLAYING: It’s easy to denounce the full-frontal horrors carried out by the scientific and medical community within a totalitarian regime such as Nazi Germany. However, what do you do with a government that claims to be a champion of human rights while allowing its agents to engage in the foulest and most despicable acts of torture, abuse and human experimentation? Mind you, the U.S. government has seldom had its citizens’ best interests at heart. The government didn’t have our best interests at heart when it passed laws subjecting us to all kinds of invasive searches and surveillance, and censoring our speech and stifling our expression. It didn’t have our best interests at heart when it turned America into a battlefield and transformed law enforcement agencies into extensions of the military. Certainly the government did not have our best interests at heart when it conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins. Bottom line: a government that repeatedly lies, breaks the laws, overreaches its authority and abuses its power can’t be trusted.

 

The Moral Compass

2 Comments

Author,
Chuck Frank, Penn Valley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

“Then the inner workings of the compass will finally produce the true direction that the people and this nation still longs for and ultimately needs to find.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 



As of late there has been a lot of pointing the finger and talk in the mainstream news about “white supremacy.” What we have here is one more bone thrown out for the masses to chew on, all the while, politics becomes business as usual. American’s elected a black President for the first time in their history and riots did not happen. Why are there riots now? Did the previous administration and the mainstream news lay a foundation that was a political agenda which was meant to divide the nation and pit various races against one another for a purpose driven endgame?

White supremacy and its roots have been around for centuries but it is now part of the NWO establishment.. Some fifty or so years ago the establishment was only considered to be those who were pro business, stock market players and high rollers that lived in uptown gated white communities, and were suave country club golfers, drinkers and American flag wavers. More

Medical Kidnap News: Pennsylvania Civil Rights Attorney Medically Kidnapped for “Mental Health” Evaluation – Whereabouts Unknown

6 Comments

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Andy Ostrowski was kidnapped by law enforcement from his home in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania this week while live-streaming on Facebook.

Police entered his home without knocking, carrying tasers and clubs, claimed they had a warrant (which they apparently never showed to him) to take him in for a “mental health evaluation,” and proceeded to turn off his computer and remove him from his home by force.

His current whereabouts is unknown at the time of publication.

Here is the recording of the event:

 

Andy Ostrowski at Court House

 

 

Mr. Ostrowski is a former Civil Rights attorney, past candidate for U.S. Congress, author, radio show host, and judicial reform activist.

Andy Ostrowski for Congress

Ostrowski exposes judicial corruption, something we have covered extensively at Health Impact News, particularly on our MedicalKidnap.com website.

Medical kidnapping would be almost impossible without corrupt judges participating.

For more on this topic see:

Retired Arizona Judge Reveals Corruption in Legal System

American Judicial System for Sale: Bribes and Corruption now the Norm

Political Prisoner for Revealing Corruption?

Earlier this year, Ostrowski filed a federal lawsuit in Pennsylvania, naming the “American System of Justice” as a Defendant, along with the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and others who are alleged to have compromised our access to justice, and the loss of basic rights and protections. (Copy here.)

The lawsuit claims that the American System of Justice, as reflected by the Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System, lacks constitutional checks and balances by the other two branches of government, and has failed its self-disciplinary feature, making it impossible to achieve justice in certain cases and classes of cases.  More

What if the 9/11 Whistle-Blowers are Speaking the Truth?

2 Comments

Duty to Warn

By Gary G. Kohls, MD

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Yes, all whistleblowers are taking their chances when they try to ”save the world” from the powerful corporate exploiters and predators (and their paid, conflicted and/or obedient hangers-on) that are continuously thinking of ways to extract for themselves the planet’s resources – even if it means that they have to go so far as to start wars to do so. In the exploitive process these often sociopathic entities seem to have no qualms about creating war refugees (in essence, cannibalizing humanity) or creating climate change refugees if those acts are necessary for them to gain control over the intended victim’s resources.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

The day after 9-11-2017, the 16th anniversary of 9/11/01, I received an email message about my last Duty to Warn column concerning the Crime and Cover-up of 9/11/01 that he had just read the day before. The message simply said:

“Gary, if what you and Dr Fetzer say is true, aren’t you afraid of being ‘taken out’?

I’d like to see a list of important 9/11 people that have been silenced.” 

As has always happened on every one of the past fifteen 9/11 anniversary dates, the talking heads of every major media outlet were obediently repeating the long-disproved myths about “the attacks on 9/11”. The blinded and solemn talking heads were dutifully mouthing officialdom’s pronouncements about the 3,000 innocents that were killed by those “attacks” on the Twin Towers.

Of course, there are increasingly large numbers around the world that have seen the evidence disproving the absurd conspiracy theories of the Cheney/Bush White House and they have seen through the propaganda that has kept the mythology alive. These folks now understand that without the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers, none of the 300+ NYFD firefighters would have died and the vast majority of the other two thousand plus victims that weren’t killed initially by the two fireballs and the subsequent brief fires also would not have died. Most of those that died on 9/11/01 were killed by the demolitions and not because of any theoretical Muslim hi-jackers from Saudi Arabia.

On 9/11/17, I received this email: More

Saving America & Our Pristine Forests

Leave a comment

Author, Chuck Frank

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Place your eyes upon those trees of wonder and know that they are calling out to you. They know your name and they want you to understand something which is truly of a great concern, and that is this:

They are about to burn.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The regular summer wildfire storms of the west have hit again. It is a regular epidemic. The cause of these yearly infernos are most often referred to as being connected to “climate change.” However, environmentalists and the mainstream news are regularly quick to use the climate change phrase as being the key root cause of this and a host of other events besides wildfires. More often than not,, any calamity connected to the late great planet earth, whether it be wildfires, drought, floods, hurricanes, or extreme variations in weather patterns, will be trumpeted by the MSM and environmental groups who will then jump on it.

Natural disasters, which are “related to those key words labeled “climate change”, are wholly fabricated and “growing” while a list of non-profits are there to intensify the rhetoric as they climb aboard a ghostly train that is meant to keep the public indoctrinated on a multitude of trends to prove that the earth is round but also reeling from CO2 and other hypothetical factors. Mother earth is about to spin out of control right? Just keep up the fear factor and then watch the “climate fund” grow.

And who are these major players in the save the planet and 1000 species mix?

All one must do is to just keep track and follow the billions of dollars and where it comes from and where it goes. Here is a short list who is behind the super funds: More

Arizona: ACC Gives APS a Rate Increase on smart Meters

4 Comments

Information & Perspective by Warren Woodward
Sedona, Arizona ~ August 17, 2017

          At their Open Meeting last Tuesday, the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) commissioners voted 4 to 1 to give APS a rate increase of about 4.5% on residential customers’ rates. Since all the commissioners were elected with major APS money spent on their campaigns, their votes were to be expected.

         The lone No vote was from commissioner Robert Burns. Burns has been in dispute, and Superior Court, with the other commissioners and APS over alleged money spent by APS two elections ago to get commissioners Little & Forese elected. As a commissioner, Burns has the legal right to examine APS’s books but he has been stonewalled for about 2 years.

         Burns contends that because of APS’s influence, those two commissioners should have recused themselves. He wants the rate case done over. The issue hangs with the Superior Court judge hearing the case. You can read more about that here: http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/08/15/arizona-corporation-commission-approves-aps-rate-hike/
       

More

STOP FLORIDA FREE KILL STATUTE

4 Comments

CAUSES

Stop Florida Free Kill Statute

More

GLOBAL WARMING TOTALLY DEBUNKED

Leave a comment

2017 August 11              from G. Edward Griffin

GLOBAL WARMING
TOTALLY DEBUNKED

Send this to Trump to challenge the UN Climate Accord
Last December, Freedom Force International presented a one-day conference on the topic: Global Warming, An Inconvenient Lie. It featured presentations by fourteen world-class experts on climatology, environmentalism, and political science – and they totally demolished the politically motivated theory of man-made global warming. This entire event will be broadcast free on the Internet, Monday through Friday, Sept. 4–8.

Click here to check out the experts in this series and to get your password for the free broadcast. 

The Trump administration is receiving strong support to reject the UN’s Climate Accord, but the carbon-tax and government-control crowd is pushing hard to criminalize any opposition to their plans. Gloal Warming, An Inconvenient Lie has arrived just in time to make a big difference in this battle. If seen by enough people, public awareness can stop them in their tracks. This is not just an issue of learning the truth. It’s about building a genuine movement for the defense of liberty.

We have sent a copy of this docu-series to President Trump in hopes that it will strengthen his resolve to keep the US out of the UN Climate Accord, but that is not enough. He needs to know that the public is solidly behind him. If tens-of-thousands of people sent him an email asking him to watch this program and comment on it publicly, it could cause enough stir to keep public awareness moving in the right direction.

Don’t forget your friends. They, too, are in great need of this information and will thank you for it, so please pass this message to them as well. Nothing will happen at the legislative level without a genuine grass-roots movement to back it up.

Click here to check out the experts in this series and to get your password for the free broadcast.  
            
YOUR COUPON CODE IS  GEG 

No purchase is necessary, but If you prefer to watch the series on your own schedule, a DVD album is available and, for a limited time, a 40% discount will apply. Because your name is on my email list as a supporter, you will receive an additional 10% discount by entering GEG as the coupon code on the order form. After clicking “Add to cart”, choose “VIEW CART” to access the entry field for the coupon code.

Back to the main point: Between September 4–8, the broadcast of Inconvenient Lie is free to everyone. Foreward this announcement to your friends so they, too, can see this exposé of one of the greatest frauds of history. Politicians will not abandon plans for carbon taxes and controls in the pretense of fighting global warming unless we the people demand it.

 
~~ G. Edward Griffin 
Want to join our Outreach Team as an affiliate?
If you have a web site, a blog, or a hefty list of social-media friends – and if you would like to help us spread the word about Global Warming, An Inconvenient Lie, we have a rewards program that definitely will interest you. Contact me personally for details here.
P.O. Box 4646
Thousand Oaks California 91359
USA

More

Fatally Flawed Justice System: The Monopoly of the Corporate BAR Associations

18 Comments

Be sure to read the comments that are coming in.  Click the link above to access!

Marti Oakley

PPJ Gazette copyright ©

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution for the United States authorizing, or otherwise directing the creation of these self protecting unions that have monopolized our judicial system at every level and use that monopoly to profit at the public’s expense. And, there is nothing authorizing the incorporation of these specialized unions or of the Supreme Court itself. Yet here we are in the grips of these corporate entities who have monopolized the very judicial system meant to protect America from just such things.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In every state and on the Federal level, the BAR Associations have established a monopoly on our courts and our so-called judicial system. The existing Sherman Act: the Clayton Act and FTC Act only become active when the monopolized systems that have been established harm consumers. I can think of no other more harmful monopoly to the American public overall, than what passes for the judicial system in America and its associated BAR unions that not ony control and own our courts, but also profit mightily from doing so. The law is what they say it is regardless of what the law might actually be.

The Sherman Act outlaws “every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade,” and any “monopolization, attempted monopolization, or conspiracy or combination to monopolize.” Long ago, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherman Act does not prohibit every restraint of trade, only those that are unreasonable. Obviously, the Supreme Court has decided that the monopolies that exist in our courts are not unreasonable. Especially since they too, participate in that monopoly.

Q: Do you believe the monopolies on our courts at every level via so-called BAR Associations are unreasonable?

When individuals go to all the expense and time of acquiring a degree in law, why should they then be required to pass some contrived test, many times at great expense, to acquire a union card (The BARS are UNIONS) permitting them to work in the field they trained in or to practice their trade in any court room in this country? No union card? No access to the courts. Didn’t pay your BAR union dues for access to the courts they monopolize? Too bad for you!

Even the Supreme Court of the United States has established itself as its own BAR. To be heard in this highly politicized “court”, you must be a member in good standing for four years in another BAR union before you can apply to appear in their closed union shop called the Supreme Court. More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: