5 Privacies you didn’t know you lost

Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat. As so it was in Hitler’s Germany. In the 1930’s the Nazis implemented a eugenics depopulation program regarding the elderly, the sick, mentally challenged and physically deformed called T-4.

Image result for HITLER T4

Wall Street and the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations are responsible for funding Hitler’s rise to power and the eugenics programs the Nazis modeled their T-4 program from American Eugenicists to rid the Germany and the Aryan race of what Hitler called “useless eaters”.

Image result for HITLER ROCKEFELLER EUGENICS

In fact, these powerful forces continue their eugenics research to this day, branching out into DNA and genetics in their quest to rid the world of not only all disease, but all flawed humans. Their goal is to create the perfect human while weeding out the unwanted and useless elements of our society by overtly and covertly depopulating the planet to manageable levels, namely 500,000,000.

Sound’s crazy, doesn’t it? But its true. You can’t make this stuff up.

And what about the rise in autism from vaccines? 1 in 10,000 Americans had autism in 1980 with 6 vaccines given to children. Today more than 60 vaccines are given to children and autism rates are 1 in 68.

In 20 years what will America look like and what will be done with all of these millions and millions of autistic grown-ups? Hitler has the answer, a neo-T-4 depopulation program.

And what about this elderly “health aid”? Could it be a coincidence that this company titled their product T-4 by accident, or as a sick joke, or maybe it is something more sinister hidden right before our very eyes.

The new eugenics: Life in our vast chemical vats

March 31, 2011

ppjg Agenda 21, eugenics autism, chemtrails, DNA, eugenics, genetics, GMO's, Marti Oakley, PPJG, scientific industrialists, vaccinations, vaccines deaths 20 Comments

______________________________________________

“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks. In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”. [pp.167-169] Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931 “

______________________________________________

As far back as the late 1800’s, maybe even earlier, has been a concerted effort by collections of individuals who somehow view themselves as superior to the general population to institute eugenics; a system of controlled breeding of those they viewed as inferior. The American Eugenics Society formed the blueprint for what was later used in Nazi Germany to systematically purge Europe of those they found undesirable based on race, intellectual capacity, infirmities, social rejections, physical traits and even age. We’ve come a long way, baby.

Eugenics has been transformed, re-created, re-packaged and has a shiny new image signified by the systematic poisoning of the world’s populations through the use of chemicals, vaccines, lethal medications, chemtrails and efforts to genetically alter food to achieve a soft kill. In order to make this selective genetic machine operate efficiently, global efforts are being implemented to collect the DNA of every human being on earth. It is our DNA that must be altered, rendered inefficient and damaged, allowing the manipulation and exploitation coveted by the scientific industrialists.

“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks. In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”. [pp.167-169] Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931

Is this not where we are now? The food in our stores is irradiated, contaminated with gmo’s, loaded with chemicals, preservatives, dyes, residual pesticides, herbicides, residual vaccines, hormones, antibiotics and foods created from combining the genes of unrelated species and from cloning. Our food supply, so infected with toxins of all kinds produced for no other reason than to manipulate ownership of the food supply for profit by bio-pirates, now presents a threat to the health of human beings and poses immediate danger to the environment. More

National Geographic Genographic Project & IBM

July 3, 2009

Gary Rea Articles, CORPORATIONS, NWO, Social Engineering depopulation, DNA, eugenics, genetics, Genographic Project, IBM, National Geographic, racially-specific bioweapons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board 12 Comments

In my earlier article, Applied DNA Sciences Collaborates with Government to Create DNA-Based Real ID, I mentioned the use of DNA for potentially nefarious purposes (from cataloging the DNA of everyone on earth, to collecting data that can be used to engineer racially-specific and even individually-specific bioweapons) and how it is being collected from large segments of the population through voluntary, yet deceptive means, such as DNA projects for genealogists, or 23andme.com’s collection of DNA for matching prospective spouses, etc.

I’d like to turn your attention, now, to yet another example of this sort of seemingly benign DNA gathering, disguised as a scientific anthropological project to track mankind’s origins and ancient migration patterns. This is the stated goal of the National Geographic Society’s Genographic Project.

On the surface, it seems innocuous enough, especially to people like myself, who have been involved directly in the use of DNA testing for genealogical research (as I mentioned in my previous article). Millions of my fellow genealogists, who are mostly hobbyists, like myself, interested in their ancestry and interested in trying new tools to further their research, have signed up for and participated in thousands of DNA surname projects. The goal is to use DNA testing to establish relationships with other genealogists who may hold key data that could help us to advance our research. However, as I mentioned previously, they may not be aware of the potentially nefarious uses being made of their DNA samples.

The Genographic Project may not be as innocuous as it appears to be, especially when you consider that IBM is involved as its chief source of funding. It was IBM that created the computer punch cards used to assemble a database of the inmates of Nazi Germany’s death camps during WWII. This was, in fact, how IBM got started. Given IBM’s ties to the Nazis and to eugenics, it is not surprising that they are funding a project that has, as one of its goals, assembling a database of DNA of indigenous people from all over the world. This particular aspect of the Genographic Project may very well be part of an effort to engineer racially-specific bioweapons. Investigative author Edwin Black has written two books, one on the role of IBM in the Nazi’s death camps, titled IBM and the Holocaust, and the other is War Against the Weak, which doucments the rise of eugenics and mentions IBM’s role in that, as well.

Reading through the frequently asked questions page of the Genographic Project website, one can get a fairly good idea (if one reads between the lines and sees beyond the hype) as to what this project is really all about. For example, under question number eleven, “Has the Genographic Project Received any Outside Review and Approval?,” it is stated that the project has been reviewed and approved by the Social and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Pennsylvania Office of Regulatory Affairs. This is one office of the IRB, which also has an office at the University of Chicago. Note that the Chicago office’s web address contains the words, “human subjects.” Indeed, as the Genographic Project FAQ page says, the IRB is directly involved in “research involving human participants.” That is what they do. However, as Dr. Tim O’Shea points out in his article, “The Doors of Perception,” the public relations industry commonly uses fake organizations to bolster the claims of advertisers and give them an air of scientific legitimacy. I believe the IRB is another case in point and is a front organization for the eugenics movement.

Note, also, that every one of the organizations cited by the Genographic Project as an approving reviewer of some sort are foreign based organizations within universities, some of which are just further branches of the IRB. Each of these is located in a country in which the indigenous population are DNA test subjects for the Genographic Project. In fact the IRB is entrenched in many universities around the world, including Georgetown University, which has been intimately linked with the Jesuits, the Freemasons and the Illuminati.

The Genographic Project’s cataloging of indigenous peoples’ DNA has, so far, encompassed East Asia, India, the Middle East, North America, North Eurasia, and Sub-Saharan Africa – the very focus of the depopulation agenda of the elite.

The DNA samples are being gathered voluntarily, via “informed consent,” according to the Genographic Project, however, one must ask exactly what the participants are being informed of. Like all these other seemingly innocuous DNA gathering organizations and companies, they hide their true agenda behind a mask of scholarly research and science.

One other comment in the FAQ page that makes the racially-specific bioweapon suspicion credible is, “The core scientific objectives of the Genographic Project will be advanced by engaging the participation of individuals and groups within key populations. From the standpoint of the Genographic Project, ‘key populations’ are stable populations that have lived within their respective geographic regions and maintained their present culture for many generations. This stability makes the genetic signatures carried by each member anthropologically informative and will help to provide reliable indicators of ancient migratory patterns.” It is more than convenient that this can be viewed as either the benign goal of an organization interested in only the scientific investigation of mankind’s roots, or it can equally be exactly what eugenicists would do in order to isolate racially-specific genetic traits and signatures that could be exploited to manufacture drugs, processed foods, chemicals and viruses that can be used to render these indigenous groups extinct. Given the aims of certain segments of the scientific community in the recent past, it is not at all unreasonable to suggest this is the true objective.

Bio Safety Assessment Tool…….BAT

June 22, 2009

ppjg GMO BAT, bio assessment, biosafety, genetic risks, genetics, GEO's, GMO, modified food Leave a comment

https://bat.genok.org/bat/

Welcome to the BAT

The Biosafety Assessment Tool (BAT) is an online resource for those

identifying potential hazards and evaluating the risks of Genetically

Modified/Engineered Organisms (GMOs/GEOs). The text and figures

of the BAT are free for public use.

https://bat.genok.org/bat/ click here to sign up for free.

The genetic conspiracy…about Monsanto

May 22, 2009

ppjg Food Safety, GMO allergies, genetics, GMO, herbicides, Monsanto, pesticides, super weeds Leave a comment

Germany: Demonstrators watch as fields are destroyed containing gmo. Allergies, insufficient testing, disregarded data, misinformation……testing that is totally inadequate. No one can produce proof that gmo is harmless. Super weeds are developing; people are getting sick.

NAIS: Another link in the attempts to control food supplies worldwide

February 13, 2009

martijo National Animal Indentification System genetic patents, genetics, Genus, Monsanto, NAIS, PIC, UN, USDA Leave a comment

Anyone who has researched the history of the National Animal Identification System realizes very quickly this global strategy being pushed by the toxic Monsanto Corporation, Genus and PIC, is nothing less than a plan to seize control of the worlds food production on every level. And, like the efforts to convert water from a human right, to one of a commodity to be sold only to those who can afford it, food of all kinds, from all sources will no longer be a human right if these Frankenfood corporations and the United Nations are successful.

http://www.eseap.cipotato.org/upward/Publications/Agrobiodiversity/pages%20475-487%20(Paper%2058).pdf

Genus, and other corporations who are jumping on the bandwagon in the hopes of patenting animal genetic resources, is the primary force behind NAIS. The USDA is a willing and compliant partner, acting as lawmaker, spy, judge and executioner. The USDA having been reported repeatedly for illegal search and seizure is allowed to act as a mercenary agency on behalf of these private interests without reprimand from congress. In fact, you would never know we even have a congress when it comes to NAIS and the actions of USDA.

The biotech company’s intent is to monopolize existing breeds of farm animals just as they have done with genetically altered seeds. 73% of all grain now grown in the US is genetically altered and patented. The intent is to pirate all grain crops using seed which, in the case of Monsanto, is only “leased” to the farmer…not sold. This according to a rule Monsanto developed itself, after the seeds had been sold. Using this rule, Monsanto is suing farmers…..after sending their own mercenary agents storming onto private land collecting samples and seizing crops.

The ‘inventors’ of animal breeds from No Patents on Seeds

“Corporations like PIC and Genus, who are among the biggest international players in the animal breeding sector, are especially active in buying up other firms and patent applications filed. Monsanto is on the other hand entering this business as a relative outsider, having been basically active in a different area. This company has not only bought its way into pig breeding and filed patents having a broad coverage, it has also concluded extensive licensing agreements with the genome company, MetaMorphix, which has for its part filed numerous patent applications in this sphere.” http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=53&Itemid=42

Rather than advancing biodiversity which is the claim of not only biotech, but also the United Nations, genetic alteration of existing breeds of livestock and the resulting patents would seriously reduce diversity. Hybrids, which would result from the genetic tampering, would be highly susceptible to disease if such tampering did not actually create new and unknown diseases.

MAIN GENETICS COMPANIES IN GLOBAL LIVESTOCK BREEDING from No Patents on Seeds

“The US company Monsanto, net sales 7 billion USD, is better known for its leadership in genetically modified seed than in livestock genes. But with Monsanto’s acquisition, cooperation and patent policy regarding cattle and pig, it in a few years may well dominate gene markets not only with regard to plants but also to livestock. In 2004 it entered a strategic and exclusive collaboration with the genetic research company MetaMorphix, giving Monsanto access to the completest available swine genome data available/ http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/images/documents/livestock_genetics_.pdf

Genetic alteration is not the same as selective breeding where livestock is carefully bred to produce the best qualities of the breed. Genetic alteration generally is done to accelerate growth or production at the expense of the animal.

The wildly false claims Monsanto made about recombinant bovine growth hormone [rBGH] is a prime example of the harsh affects of forcing accelerated growth or production. Monsanto claimed rBGH increased production by at least 20%. They just failed to tell the farmer or consumer the 20% was the result of mastitis and the increase was the amount of pus in the milk that resulted from using the growth hormone. http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/foodsafety/dairy/no-rbgh

In order for genetic patenting to overtake independent livestock producers, it is necessary to know who is breeding what and where is it located. That’s where NAIS comes in. This system, if it isn’t stopped, will catalogue all farm and ranch animals and domestic pets. Once catalogued, this data will all be held in corporate data banks which will tell the biotech company just exactly where to establish their altered breeds. As with the contamination of natural crops by uncontrolled genetically altered seeds, companies such as Monsanto will develop herds in close proximity to natural herds and wait for the opportunity to present itself for cross-breeding. Once they are assured this has happened, the livestock owner will be sued, just like the seed farmer, and a valuable natural herd will be stolen and the USDA will likely be doing the herding.

Behind all of the USDA grandstanding about needing to be able to track disease outbreaks, lays the true intent. The USDA is not concerned with food safety or animal disease outbreaks. USDA is facilitating the data collection necessary to locate, identify and seize natural herds and to establish industrialized factory farms to replace independent farms and ranches in the US.

Every effort must be expended to not only halt any further activity in implementing NAIS, but also to abolish the USDA which has become nothing more than a mercenary enforcement arm of biotech pirates.

No patents on Seeds

http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=53&Itemid=42

http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/images/documents/livestock_genetics_.pdf

Monsanto rBGH/ pus in milk

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/foodsafety/dairy/no-rbgh

International Agreements Relevant to the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources

http://www.eseap.cipotato.org/upward/Publications/Agrobiodiversity/pages%20475-487%20(Paper%2058).pdf