Home

The Brunswick Affair

Leave a comment

By: John Leckrone

John Leckrone on Facebook

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

So here we are now in 2018. We are bombarded with media and electronics and dirty electricity. 5 G is about to be the norm. Our bodies are consuming fluoridated water, GMO crops, heavy metals from everything being dumped into the air by the chemtrails as well as the cereal we eat and the vaccines we are poisoned with. In the mean time THEY play with our emotions.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

I stumbled across a reference to the Brunswick Affair and got curious as to what it was. I had never heard of it before. Turns out it was a French movie marketed as a “documentary” which had mind control as the subject matter.

People who owned a specific television produced by the Brunswick company would be watching television (tel a vision or tel lie vision) and their tv set would emit ions. This in turn would cause people to go out and buy things they did not need. Examples included men buying women’s clothing and people buying dog food who did not have a dog.

While these issues never happened in real life (or did they?) it is a fact that the movie theaters were able to increase the sale of coke products and popcorn by putting in a one or two frame picture featuring these refreshments embedded in the film. The man or woman viewing the film would not consciously recognize the couple of frames of advertising but their subconscious did. This fact was proven by the increase in sales and we know that while our conscious mind might miss something our unconscious mind does not.

Now having said all of that we are now 56 years later and “government” has had a lot of time to make science fiction a reality. Keep in mind all television stations went digital several years back and analog was done away with. Could there be a reason for that? Of course there is.

More

Study: One Quarter of All Americans Take a Drug Every Week that Kills their Empathy

2 Comments

The Freethought Project

Tylenol the most popular drug taken in the US Kills Your Empathy. One Quarter of All Americans Take Tylenol Every Week & downing it with a nice glass of Fluoride…..well you get the picture.

Notice the “fluo” part in Prozac’s chemical name, fluoxetine. It denotes the drug’s main active ingredient: fluoride. Fluoride robs people of their will; and makes people easier to control. Makes you apathetic. US Government Admits: Americans Have Been Overdosed on Fluoride For Decades: bit.ly/GovOverdose

Pharmaceuticals are literally numbing people and preventing them from experiencing positive emotions!! Please reconsider taking any pain killers, if you’re experiencing pain dive deeper and listen to what your body is really telling you and look into natural ways of remedying the pain. There are alternatives that don’t have detrimental & lasting chemical effects on your ability to be and feel HAPPY.

“If you take Tylenol to ease your pain, you might actually be experiencing an unexpected side effect: apathy. New research shows that acetaminophen, the main ingredient in Tylenol, can dull positive emotions as well as any pain you’re feeling.

More

Minnesota House And Senate: Stop Mandatory Fluoridation

Leave a comment

strip banner

 

Petition by

Loren Cramer

United States

 To sign the petition click here!

 

Minnesota statute, (144.145) requires the fluoridation of the municipal water supply.

Hydrofluosilicic Acid is an industrial by-product of the phosphate industry that is added to the water for the, “prevention of tooth decay.” This chemical is too toxic to be legally discharged into the environment. Fluoridation of the water supply violates the ethic of informed consent set forth in the Nuremberg Code and is bad medical practice. Fluoridation has never been proven, “safe and effective,” with substantial evidence. According to the FDA, fluoride is a “drug.”

By this definition, the practice of fluoridation has been used as a massive experiment in Minnesota for over 40 years.

MD’s are required to evaluate their patients prior to prescribing drugs and should also do follow up, yet fluoride is being forced on an entire population without regard for the dose received from water and other sources. Decision makers should not be able to do to the entire state what doctors cannot do to individuals.

To universalize the concept of medicating the water without informed consent makes it morally wrong. One size does not fit all. Medicating the water for the, “greater good” takes away autonomy especially for those who can’t afford filtered water.

Because something has been done for a long time does not make it safe or just.

The fuel additive lead was once thought to be safe. The precautionary principle and due diligence have been ignored for way too long. In 2011 the EPA and HHS lowered the recommended amount of fluoride due to high rates of fluorosis.

Fluoride toothpastes are required to carry poison warnings, yet parents are not warned about ingesting fluoride and it’s potential developmental hazards.

The EPA has classified fluoride as a, “Chemical with substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity.”

No rational person would call for a chemical to be added to the water that could cause brain damage. Fluoride is the active ingredient in many pesticides and is linked to increases in bone cancer, thyroid dysfunction, bone cancer, and lower IQ’s.

To:
Repeal Minnesota statute, (144.145)

Sincerely, [Your name]

https://www.change.org/petitions/minnesota-house-and-senate-stop-mandatory-fluoridation#

An Inconvenient Tooth: Fluoride in the water

2 Comments

From: Healthcare Tyranny

A Letter To The Mn House & Senate, Re: Fluoridation Of The Municipal Water Supply

 

Please introduce legislation to repeal Minnesota statute, (144.145) which requires the fluoridation of the municipal water supply. Hydrofluosilicic Acid is an industrial by-product of the phosphate industry that is added to the water for the, “prevention of tooth decay.” This chemical is too toxic to be legally discharged into the environment. Fluoridation of the water supply violates the ethic of informed consent set forth in the Nuremberg Code and is bad medical practice. Fluoridation has never been proven, “safe and effective,” with substantial evidence.

  • According to the FDA, fluoride is a “drug.”
  • By this definition, the practice of fluoridation has been used as a massive experiment in Minnesota for over 40 years.
  • MD’s are required to evaluate their patients prior to prescribing drugs and should also do follow up,
  • yet fluoride is being forced on an entire population without regard for the dose received from water and other sources. More

How to Make Your City Council Accountable for Adding Fluoride to Water

10 Comments

 

 Frank Veracity/PPJ Contributor
October 2, 2011

This excellent video explains how you can put your City council on the hook for liability for allowing fluoride into the water supply.  You may demand that they put a warning on customer water bills.


 The experts in this video suggest the following strategy:

Instead of collecting a large amounts of signatures on a petition, they advocate educating City Council members directly on the dangers of fluoride.  Mosaic, a fluoride manufacturer, recently printed a warning on their Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) that provides evidence that fluoride is harmful.  Mosaic’s Material Safety Data Sheet may be used as evidence to give to any City Council across the country.  Here is Mosaic’s warning (on page 2):

Prolonged or repeated overexposure to fluoride compounds may cause fluorosis.  Fluorosis is characterized by skeletal changes, consisting of osteosclerosis (hardening or abnormal density of bone) and osteomalacia (softening of bones) and by mottled discoloration of the enamel of teeth (if exposure occurs during enamel formation). Symptoms may include bone and joint pain and limited range of motion. Conditions aggravated by exposure may include skin and respiratory (asthma-like) disorders.”  More

Homeward Bound: the planned use of water as a weapon

2 Comments

 Janet C. Phelan (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

__________________________________________

“the planned use of water as a weapon, authorized under Section 817 of the U.S. Patriot Act. Section 817, The Expansion of the Biological Weapons Statute, is authorizing the use of toxins (poisons) and delivery systems (which is weapons terminology) apparently against citizens of the United States of America. It is the contention of this reporter that 817 is an “umbrella” statute, authorizing a number of poison projects, including, but not limited to, the water weapon.”

_________________________________________ 

Driving up to the pumps, I have a distinct experience of entering  “No Man’s Land.” Gas is up over three bucks in Oregon and shows no sign of ever coming down. It strikes me that this feels like an affront, a virtual assault —that the price of gas is actually attacking my ever-diminishing financial reserves, and laying waste that green stuff which constitutes my nest egg. 

A confluence of forces are amassing at this point in time, which are keeping folks home much more than in past years. One is the price of gas. Another is the plunge of the dollar, world-wide. My intended trip to Jerusalem and points beyond will be deferred to a later date, for this reason alone. 

Other economic realities buttress the decision to stick around home plate. Job insecurity coupled with the spectre of possible home foreclosure amp up the sense of financial anxiety. The net effect of these  conditions  is that Americans are more home-bound. Like so many other Americans, I look anxiously to the political horizon to see a sign of change but see only a changing of the guard as our collective economic future marches towards a dark terminus.   More

Marti Oakley and Barb Peterson: The Truth Squad this Sunday

Leave a comment

Join us Sunday evening at 8 CST on The Truth Squad Radio Show.

 

  

Our topics for the first half of the hour will be the Codex, Fluoride, Auschwitz, Monsanto connection, as well as Dust Regulations, No Till, and Monsanto’s Monopoly. On the second half of the show we will be talking with Paul Griepentrog, our guest from last week,about the Organics Illusion.

*********************************

*******************

********

The Truth Squad Radio Show with Marti Oakley and Barb Peterson

Date / Time: 8/15/2010

6:00 pm PST

8:00 pm CST

9:00 pm EST

Call-in Number: (917) 388-4520

URL: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley

Is there news in your area no one is reporting? Want to be a guest?  

Give us a call on SKYPE: 320-281-0585 or email us at truthsquadradio@gmail.com

Ending Fluoridation “One Town at a Time”

Leave a comment

Fluoride Action Network
http://fluoridealert.org/

FAN Bulletin 2028: Ending Fluoridation “One Town at a Time”

August 8, 2010
  
We are getting close to making a decision on an appointment of a Campaign Director for FAN. We have been a little delayed interviewing candidates because of the intensive activities we have had on two other fronts – last minute edits on the new book and the July 23-27 FAN Conference.

As always these conferences have a way of paying us back over and over again in the renewed energy and enthusiasm they generate. This conference was no exception. As one participant wrote to us: More

The Codex, Fluoride, Auschwitz, Monsanto Connection

Leave a comment

By Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

What do Codex Alimentarius with its official food standards, the fluoridation of our water and food supply, genocide at the Auschwitz concentration camp, and Monsanto, the company responsible for genetically altering the world’s food supply all have in common? Is there a connection that binds these seemingly diverse organizations together? Yes, there is. In fact, they are so inextricably bound that separating them is all but impossible.

More

Declare your Independence with Ernest Hancock and guest Barbara H. Peterson

Leave a comment

Join me on Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock, founder and publisher of Freedom’s Phoenix, when we discuss:

Are you being fluoridated against your will?

 

Call In Number: 866-986-6397 (866-986-NEWS)

On the Air: 4pm-7pm CT Monday-Friday

Liberty News Radio: Guest – Barbara H. Peterson

Date: Friday, August 6, 2010

 

Liberty News Radio (LNR) Call-in number: 866-986-6397 (866-986-NEWS)

EST: 5pm-8pm

CST: 4pm-7pm

MST: 3pm-6pm

PST: 2pm-5pm

Program Location: http://libertynewsradio.com/wire/hosts/hancock.php

 

 

FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK:FAN objects to mischaracterization of fluoridation opponents

1 Comment

FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK   
http://fluoridealert.org/

June 25, 2010

Political Mischaracterization of Fluoridation Opposition Dismays Scientists

CANTON, N.Y., June 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Scientists representing the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) strongly object to recent mischaracterizations of fluoridation opponents by political pundits Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann and others in conjunction with Senator Harry Reid’s Nevada re-election campaign.

“Fluoridation opposition is science-based and growing,” says Paul Connett, PhD, FAN Executive Director, who has co-authored the upcoming book, “The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics that Keep it There.” Co-authors are James Beck, MD, PhD, professor emeritus of medical physics at the University of Alberta in Calgary; and Spedding Micklem, DPhil, professor emeritus at Edinburgh University.

“We have spent many years investigating water fluoridation and the toxicity of fluoride and we are dismayed that commentators are willing to repeat, without verification, pro-fluoridation statements that disparage scientists and citizens who oppose the practice,” says Connett.  

“FAN’s website http://www.FluorideAlert.org  has a wealth of scientific information indicating that water fluoridation is neither safe nor effective,” says Connett.  “In fact, mounting evidence shows that it is harmful to large segments of the population and has helped to create an epidemic of dental fluorosis in children.”  On April 12, 2010, Time magazine listed fluoride as one of the “Top Ten Common Household Toxins” and described fluoride as both “neurotoxic and potentially tumorigenic if swallowed.”
More

The Case Against Fluoride. How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water

Leave a comment

 live link:      FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK   

FAN Bulletin 2016:  Organizing to win and more tools with which to do it.

June 9, 2010
 
 
The Carol Patton Fluoride Fighting Memorial Fund
Carol Patton having spent over 30 years of her life fighting fluoridation continues to fight the battle from the heavens. In her will she left money to the Fluoride Action Network to do just that. FAN’s Board of Directors has decided to use these funds in three ways:

I have co-authored a new book with James Beck, MD, PhD and Spedding Micklem, DPhil, entitled:

The Case Against Fluoride.
How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water
and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There.

Chelsea Green is the publisher and this is their online description:  More

Fluoride in your water? You might want to re-think that.

Leave a comment

VoteOutFluoride.com

1. Fluoride was the first thing the Nazis put in the prisoners water supply.

2. 97% of Western Europe does not fluoridate their water.

3. American Dental Association advises parents to avoid using fluoridated water for their babies.

4. Ingestion of fluoride according to the National Research Council (NRC) can damage the brain, the thyroid gland and the bones.

5. Fluoride added to our water comes from industrial waste products from the phosphate fertilizer industry.

6. No statistical correlation between tooth decay cavities between fluoridated and non-fluoridated countries.

7. Fluoride is the active ingredient in many rat poisons.

8. There is enough fluoride in a tube of tooth paste to kill a child.

9. Fluoride in government animal studies has been found to cause bone cancer.

10. Excessive consumption of fluoride causes dental fluorosis, the pitting, chipping and discolouration of teeth.

11. Excessive consumption of fluoride  can also cause skeletal fluorosis which can be mistaken for osteosclerosis, arthritis and rheumatism.

Fluoride Network News: fluoride as “neurotoxic and possibly tumorogenic if swallowed.

Leave a comment

Meanwhile, there have been four important developments to which we would like to draw your attention:

1) TIME MAGAZINE in its April 12th issue has an article discussing common household toxics to which we and our kids are exposed. TIME lists fluoride in its “Top 10 Common Household Toxins.” They describe fluoride as “neurotoxic and possibly tumorogenic if swallowed.”  

2) LOUISIANA:  Legislation is advancing in the Senate to forbid the purchase of water fluoridation chemicals from China. The Advocate, April 14.

3)  SOUTHAMPTON UK:  Lib Dem, Tory and Green candidates for the parliamentary seats in Southampton have said they opposed plans to add fluoride to the city’s tap water. BBC News, April 10.

4)  WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA:  Carol Clinch of People for Safe Drinking Water is challenging the legality of using hydrofluorosilic acid to fluoridate Waterloo’s drinking water by filing a complaint with Health Canada.  Waterloo Chronicle, April 14.

Slowly the wheels seem to be turning in our direction.

Paul

###

Do you have weapons that are not locked up in your home?

Leave a comment

by: Marti Oakley (c) 2009  All rights reserved

Tell a Friend 

A PPJ reader asked us to share this with all of you:

Been to the doctor recently?  I just went for my check up and what a surprise!

The questionaire I was asked to fill out prior to seeing the doctor has now expanded to twelve (12) pages.  On page ten (10) appeared this question:

“Do you have guns in your home that are not locked up?”  My answer was: “None of your damn business”.

The questions that comprised the rest of the questionaire were on family history (not applicable). 

Do I smoke? How much? How often? (Not Applicable)

Do I drink? How much? How often?  (Not applicable)

This was page after page of data mining that had no bearing on the cause for me to be there to which I responded: NOT APPLICABLE. 

Why didn’t they ask me if I had been forced to consume gmo contaminated food?

Why didn’t they asked if I was forced to drink fluoridated water?

Why didn’t they ask if I had been previously poisoned by lethal pharmaceuticals?

The doctor asked me how I expected him to treat me effectively if I wouldn’t supply all this non-relevant information? I responded:

“I guess you’re going to have to actually pay attention to me and actually try to practice medicine”.

I was told to find a new doctor if I wasn’t going to cooperate.  I think I would be better off staying away from them altogether.

Bill W.

What You Never Expected to Hear About Water Fluoridation

1 Comment

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/09/10/water-fluoridation-part-three.aspx

By Dr. Joseph Mercola,  with Rachael Droege

flor_dees

Imagine a drug being prescribed to the entire U.S. population with no consent and no way to track dosage or individual reactions, and without concern for some people’s increased vulnerability to the drug. It sounds crazy, but that is exactly what is happening in the United States with water fluoridation.

Fluoride has been added to the U.S. water supply for over 50 years in order to prevent dental decay. Not only is the practice unsafe, which I will address later, it is also ineffective. Data compiled by the World Health Organization shows no difference in tooth decay in countries that use fluoridated water compared with countries that don’t use fluoridated water.

Further, several additional studies have found that tooth decay rates do not increase when water fluoridation is stopped, and in some cases the rates even go down. The largest U.S. survey, conducted from 1986 to 1987, found that fluoridated water made no difference in tooth decay when measured in terms of DMFT (Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth), and made a statistically insignificant difference (on about 0.5 percent of 128 tooth surfaces) when measured as DMFS (Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth Surfaces).

When water fluoridation first began it was believed that fluoride had to be ingested for it to be effective. However, this has since changed and the dental community now almost unanimously believes that fluoride’s benefits result from topical application, not when it is swallowed.

Despite fluorides apparent ineffectiveness, it is still used in the United States, but not without consequence. The fluoride that we ingest from the water supply and from a number of other sources such as toothpaste, mouthwashes, processed food, some vitamin tablets, and beverages like fruit juice, soda and tea is associated with a number of negative health effects. Consider that:

  • Fluoride accumulates in the bones, making them brittle and more easily fractured, and in the pineal gland, which may inhibit the production of the hormone melatonin, which helps regulate the onset of puberty
  • Fluoride damages tooth enamel (known as dental fluorosis) and may lower fertility rates
  • Fluoride has been found to increase the uptake of aluminum into the brain and lead into blood
  • Fluoride inhibits antibodies from forming in the blood
  • Fluoride confuses the immune system, causing it to attack the body’s tissues. This can increase the growth rate of tumors in people prone to cancer More

%d bloggers like this: