Home

A MASSIVE SCANDAL UNFOLDS SCIENTIFIC FRAUD INFESTS FISH & WILDLIFE’S TOP RANKS A NATIONAL DISGRACE

11 Comments

new-logo25Chuck Frank

lightofthenation.com

____________________________________________________

“it appears that the history of the Fish and Wildlife, and specifically…Regional Director Benjamin Tuggle, [Deputy Director Rowan] Gould, and Ashe is that whistleblowing retaliation is tolerated or even condoned. Apparently someone got promoted or something good happened to them after they retaliated.”

___________________________________________________

1888530_791967040830921_1291441710_nThe hierarchy of habitat, the Fish & Wildlife Service, is reeling from a recent expose’ by insider and whistleblower Gary Mowad. F&W’s
fabrications reveal a lack of credibility increasingly coming down from the very top. The organization, truly has become a bloated tapestry of scientific deception which is meant to de-industrialize America, and in the end, catapult her back into the 1800’s by using doctored statistics and fabricated research to support their broad claims.

Saving an old growth tree is one thing but purposefully stopping America’s wheels of production from turning has caused massive unemployment and vast economic hardship upon the people by orchestrating a 1000 + endangered species program but with a regular pattern of falsified science which is treasonous and is meant to destroy a nation but then rebuild it into the liking of an unconstitutional state lacking basic needs and those blood bought rights and freedoms which were enshrined since the founding of America. Total control of the people by government is the long term objective.

A conspiracy? Here are the facts.
More

The “Endangered” Frog and Toad-Revisited

Leave a comment

new-logo25Author,
Chuck Frank
lightofthenation.us

Recently, the US Fish and Wildlife issued their biological opinion regarding how the nine Sierra Nevada National Forests in California must address the endangered yellow-legged frog and the Yosemite toad. If 197 pages is too much for you to read then here is a snapshot.mountain frog

Now, perhaps many of you out there recall the many public hearings on whether to list the yellow-legged frog and the Yosemite Toad as a threatened or endangered species.

Most of the people that went to these hearings, Congressman, Tom McClintock for one, and thousands of others were strongly opposed to the listing. I too showed up for the grand occasion.

With as many people who went as the “anti-listers”, I coined a word, you would have thought that the Fish and Wildlife agency would have listened.

Well, as it turned out, the public hearings were just a formality, an exercise, a procedure that was meant to give the public input while the Feds, all along, had no intention of doing what the majority of the public wanted. Fish and Wildlife is sadly tuned into the Enviro-Times, and that is our latest environmentalist radio show streaming from the planet Mars. So I dialed in on K-ECO and low and behold the Sierra National Forest Service Management is “very concerned” about the immense  impact of protecting frog and toad together.

Unless we forget, we were told that the identification of these species as endangered would not have ANY significant impact on Sierra National Forest or public access. Sure. Well, well, well, think again.  It is all by design and deception. We were not told the truth and the lies of Fish and Wildlife have now been exposed. What we had feared is now coming upon us.

And here is the rest of the story.

No permits are being issued at this time until these rules are clarified for summer grazing in the Sierra National Forest. This ruling could and is already adversely affecting recreation, along with All-Terrain-Vehicles, firewood cutting, fishing, hunting, and logging, because it delineates that no wheeled vehicles may be used in the forest that “may be” a habitat for the Yosemite frog. This would also effect mechanical thinning, which is one way of reducing ladder fuels, which contribute to high intensity uncharacteristic wildfires.

For the Forest Service management to protect what the US Fish and Wildlife life is requiring, it will take away significant resources from areas like forest restoration to prevent uncharacteristic wildfires, as well as many other areas. These rules represent another Agenda 21 unfunded nightmare mandate.

In a nutshell, if our Congressmen, Sheriffs and County Supervisors do not stop the encroachment of our National Forests and the public right to use them, we the people will be left in the dust and radical environmentalism will continue to chip away at our God given land rights to where millions will bow to the new enviro-gods of the Fish and Wildlife Agency.

And, by the way, don’t include me in any of the Sunday morning worship services honoring the czars of Fish and Wildlife.

Ref: Parts taken from The Jackson Press;
  http://thejacksonpress.org/?p=30592

Right to fish: California violating its own Constitution

13 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Don Bird

patriot@rtr.net

_________________________________________________________________________________

How Clear Can Law Be?

We all know what the term, Supreme Law of the Land, means. Well, every one of the fifty states have a supreme law of the state, which is its Constitution, to which every state official is bound by an Oath of Office. The California State Constitution sets forth in Article I, Sec. 25, “The People shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the People the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the People to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish …”
Nonetheless, a criminal complaint is proceeding within the Tehama County Superior Court, California, seeking prosecution of Don Bird for executing his constitutional right of fishing upon the open waters of California. Below is his argument in his defense;

*                  *   *

Fish  & Wildlife Finally Hooked

I have a mandatory appointment with the Tehama County Superior Court    September 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM. My “Fishing Without A License” citation (so called infraction) will be my  showcase Declaration of Three of our Constitutional Rights. The following Quotes should enlighten the Judge to  dismiss this citation because my plea will be “Innocent”  until Proven Guilty.

“The  state cannot diminish rights of the people”  And in Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60,

“Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.”

Would we not say that these judicial decisions are straight to  the point – that there is no lawful method for government to put restrictions or limitations on rights belonging to  the people? Other cases are even more straight forward:

“The assertion of Federal Rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under name of local practice.” Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate  them.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.

” The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” More

STOP! THE RE-WILDING IN SISKIYOU COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

6 Comments

 www.SaveTheDams.com

  • Quick background to video: 
    Tucker was a part of “secret” meetings between NGOs from SF, Portland, and folks from WA DC who are all dam-removal enthusiasts (dam removal objectives all across the US are linked to these “special interest groups” who do not even live near these dams or in Siskiyou County). 
  • Nearly 44,000 citizens in Siskiyou County, who will be most negatively impacted, were left out of these meetings. 
  • Tucker is a non-Karuk, but Ph.D. spokesperson for the Karuk who are slated to gain millions of dollars and thousands of acres from this KBRA “agreement” as implied by the “agreement”.  
  • Meanwhile, Shasta Native Americans are in favor of the dams, have the largest land mass along the Klamath River, and have sacred burial grounds that will be washed away forever if the dams come out.  They are left out of the land and money deals on this so-called “agreement.”
  • This is less about a radical enviro named Tucker and his friends (who will obviously benefit from this farm, ranch, and sacred burial grounds-killing agreement where Chapter 4 discusses farms and ranches (regardless of the deal) may be fundamentally transformed into National Parks via wetland status.

Taken directly from the CA Dept of Fish & Game & Department of Interior’s 09/11, 1800-page “Public Draft EIS/EIR” document:

Chapter 4 – Cumulative Effects
KBRA section p4-182: “The Water Diversion Limitations, On-Project Plan, WURP, and Interim Flow and Lake Level Programs could result in changes to land uses, including changes from ranchland to water storage areas. These changes have the potential to be beneficial if they result in landscapes (wetlands) that are consistent with the naturally established, characteristic landscape.”

Chapter 4-181
 “Other cumulative actions and programs that could also improve water quality on the Klamath River include implementation of TMDLs on the Scott, Salmon, Shasta, and Klamath Rivers …and the Five Counties Road Maintenance Program.”

We either LIVE BY THE TRUTH or be damned (pun intended) by the lies.
For More, go to:  WWW.SAVETHEDAMS.COM

 
FREE RURAL AMERICA

http://www.dfg.ca.gov/serp.html?q=Public+Draft+EIS%2FEIR%22+9%2F11&cx=001779225245372747843%3A3y4rnp6j9ny&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&submit.x=8&submit.y=14

%d bloggers like this: