Home

Dear Senator Frankin……You need to rethink the expansion of the FBI powers

Leave a comment

new-logo25Marti Oakley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

171-0620085940The FBI currently has more than 40,000 US citizens on its list of who they are afraid of. Think about that number for a minute. How realistic do you believe that number is? How likely do you believe it is that 40,000 US citizens are possibly preparing to become active terrorists at any given moment? And, with this list growing each day how possible do you believe it is that an actual terrorist could be identified in the mountain of useless information that is gathered each day? Now add in the 760,000 thousand international individuals also listed. Did your head just implode with the realization that this is not a realistic or manageable system? The FBI couldn’t identify a terrorist in this mess even if one were to stand on the street holding a sign in front of their offices.

The FBI conducted 23 million background checks for guns last year, the most ever, so expanded back ground checks is not really the issue. They obviously are already doing that. What the FBI and many politicians want is the right for the FBI to void due process (which they are also doing). In other words, you are guilty if they say so….no real evidence needed. 

NOTE**

In Oklahoma, the bombing of the Murrah building did not elicit calls for banning or limiting the use of fertilizer, supposedly the main component for the explosion, or for expanded back ground checks on those purchasing fertilizer. 168 people were killed.

When 9/11 happened…..why were there no calls to limit or ban box cutters for that matter. More than 3,000 people died.

These people, and many others in supposed “terrorist” attacks, were all murdered by terrorists and the governments response in each situation is to attack the natural rights and liberties of law abiding citizens, trashing our constitutional rights. Next comes a massive expansion of police state agencies whose focus appears to be on everyone, except the possible terrorists. More

TRUTH & JUSTICE UNCENSORED

1 Comment

new-logo25Chuck Frank

__________________________________________________________________________

“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ~ James Madison, Federalist Papers 47, 30 January 1788.

______________________________________________________________________________

Only in America: George Orwell’s novel, titled 1984 reveals “double speak” and massive surveillance which is now being used 99% of the time. “Double speaks” expanded version = elections, secret files, lies, fabrications, censorship, false flags, propaganda, trashed e-mails brought back to life, mainstream media blackouts, Google censorship, political correctness, disinformation, and finally, “secret justice”, (i.e. when bogus “national securityGetImage issues” prevent a Jury investigation or evidence from being introduced to a judge.)

And this is all done in the name of bogus legalism intended to increase the power of government and their job security. I call it Babylon revisited.

We the people are the public and they have the right to know the truth and especially so when there are hundreds and hundreds of state and federal agencies which exalt their “lordship” but regularly hide behind their own major corruption which may include other lives and livelihoods being lost due to the purposeful intent of government agencies and their mission which is meant to coverup their own unlawful deeds.

And when the federal courts and judges get involved, more often than not, they will favor their own, which is the government.

Therefore, it is expedient that the American people be protected from a common occurrence that happens when courts traditionally use a tactic claiming that there is a “national security issue” while
shielding government corruption.   Consequently, by blocking key incriminating evidence, government becomes insulated from wrong doing on a regular basis.

The “Fast and Furious” debacle is a perfect example.

More

To kill the 2nd Amendment: The overthrow of the Constitutional Republic

5 Comments

new-logo25Marti Oakley  ©copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

________________________________________________________________________

It was with a great deal of sadness and disappointment that I viewed clips of Obama shilling for the United Nations Global Small Arms Treaty (ban) and even more disappointing to see police officers and sheriffs lined up behind him as he smiled and sold his attack on the 2nd Amendment.  I predicted back before the election that the UN Small Arms Treaty would be shelved until after the election, only to make sure Obama didn’t get a political black eye that might have turned the tide against him.  Sandy Hook made the perfect gunburn_deesopportunity to bring UN Small Arms mandates out into the public after the election. But you are not supposed to realize that the Obama wish list for gun control and eventual confiscation comes right out of the UN Small Arms Treaty.

With most all the gun owners of America poised and ready to fight back against any infringement on the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment, Obama appeared in Minnesota Monday claiming that the NRA members support his attack on the 2nd Amendment.

Uh….no they don’t! And neither do the majority of us out here who don’t even own a gun.  All the fake public polls, all the talking points delivered via MSM, will not change the fact that as Americans, we are well aware of the federal governments historical desire to disarm us. More

The Ruthie Report with guest: Rusty Fleming

Leave a comment

Join Ruthie on October 4th, 2012 at 8:00 CST! More

Government grabbing your guns

8 Comments

Government Grabbing Your Guns

 

TIMELY CRITICAL INTELLIGENCE ESSENTIAL FOR YOUR SECURITY

GOVERNMENT GRABBING YOUR GUNSBreaking News

San Diego, CA 06/ /12 By Dauntless Don – Contributing columnistst

THE WHITE HOUSE GUN GATE

Obama’s stealth attack on the second amendment! “We’re working on gun control under the radar. I don’t believe that people should be allowed to own guns,” Barry Obama stated in an interview with John Lott Jr.

“My first priority will be to reinstate the assault weapons ban as soon as I take office. Within 90 days, we will go after “kitchen table” dealers and work to end the gunCriminals Love Gun Control show and internet sales loopholes. In the first year, I intend to work with Congress on a national no carry law, 1 gun a month purchase limits and bans on all semi-automatic guns.” by Barack Obama at VPC Fund Raiser, 2007.

Whether you are a “guns kill people” liberal or a guardian of the second amendment you need to know that our Noble Peace Prize winning, President Barrack Hussein Obama, is attempting to eliminate your right to gun ownership.

Reader Takeaway: Throughout history, the singular reason that kings and rulers disarm their citizens is to have draconian despotic power and control over their subjects. More

SCOTUS & Eric Holder: Its political pimpin’ pimpin’, man!

10 Comments

Marti Oakley    ©     Copyright 2012- All Rights Reserved

Note:  I wrote this article last night in anticipation of what I was sure would be the results of SCOTUS….unfortunatley I was absolutely correct in my predicition on the outcome of Citizens v Obamacare.  The Court voted to uphold this unconstitional assault on America.  Just one more reason this court needs to be rendered defunct.

____________________________________________________________________

For a portion of this afternoon, I flipped back and forth between the tedious and twisted up oral arguments in the Supreme Court for and against Obamacare and the political pimping going on, on MSNBC about the pending vote of [contempt of congress] against Eric Holder, the US Attorney General. MSNBC is of course the lefts’ counter to FAUX News on the right, and these days has about as much credibility.

Those magic black robes!

I doubt there are any of us out here who think or believe that Obamacare is even remotely constitutional. Yet the Supreme’s and the attorney’s talked endlessly about whether or not the penalty tax was really a tax or just a penalty while every one of them knew it was a penalty tax meant to raise revenue and to coerce unwilling individuals into a system they don’t want to be a part of.  Simply put:  It is legislative extortion meant to raise revenue or, involuntary forced compliance which will also raise revenue.

At one point, the argument from the bench was that Social Security was also a tax that everyone had to pay. Only that isn’t really true, and neither is it true in regards to Obamacare. I have no intentions of getting into this any further except to say that Obamacare is a direct assault on individual rights and is clearly unconstitutional from start to finish. Congress knew it when they passed it and the president knew it when he signed it into law. The Supreme’s also know this and I can hardly wait to hear the convoluted rationale to be given to explain why they did not declare the entire mess unconstitutional. But I have no doubt that they will uphold this unconstitutional assault on the public.

I consider this to be Citizens v Obamacare opinion which will rival the Citizens v United for position #1 on the greatest failures of this court to defend and protect the Constitution for the people of the United States.

About those talking heads at MSNBC…. More

SCOTUS on illegal immigration

4 Comments

Marti Oakley        Copyright 2012- All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________________________________

On June 25th, 2012, the Supreme Court issued its final ruling on SB 1070, the law passed by Arizona to deal with illegal immigration that has been not only allowed by the federal government, but also encouraged.  The court struck down three of the primary points of the legislation, yet left one standing: Police can inquire about immigration status if an individual is being investigated for a criminal act, while they have him/her in custody.

SCOTUS went on to rule that the individual in question cannot be held longer than usual while that investigation occurs, but issued no guidelines on how long [usual] is, or could be.  This blatant omission of course is laying the groundwork for subsequent lawsuits brought by illegal immigrants in the future who will claim abuse.

It is alleged that the private prison industry which is flourishing in states like Arizona, actually wrote the legislation in anticipation of greater numbers of prisoners from which greater profits could be made.  This is more than likely, true.  The private corporate prison is a fast growing business in the US as these corporations engage in human trafficking for profit.  I cannot think of any other way to efficiently describe what the business is of these prisons, otherwise.

SCOTUS’ main contention was that the States cannot overstep the Federal government to deal with illegal immigration.  That is the job of the federale’s.  Only they aren’t doing their job and have not for more than two decades as the US has been steadily colonized by illegal immigrants who have found protection and privilege provided by the same agencies charged with defending our borders from just such an influx of illegal residents.

From the newly and constantly revised US Code & Title 8, regarding defense of our inland and coastal borders and just whom is charged with defending that border, we find this revision in the code: More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: