Home

Public Lands are not “Federal or State” lands

7 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25An Open Letter and Comment form Grandma Gregg

____________________________________________________________

Who actually owns “public land”?

DSC_0084As an American citizen, environmental researcher and a life-long visitor to the state of Utah, I appreciate the opportunity to provide input on the proposed Bible Springs Complex environmental assessment. The federal government does not own land in the West. These are not “state lands” and not “federal lands” and not even “government lands”.” They are public lands. The American people own the public lands in the West and they are administered on our behalf by the national government under laws and regulations. This land belongs to all citizens of the United States, not the federal government. More

The battle against Smart Meters continues…but don’t count on your public officials to help you

30 Comments

Marti Oakley  © 2012 All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________________

News is coming in across the country regarding the fight against smart meters. If ever there was an indicator that not only does our government not work for the people, but that they have absolutely no interest in what the general population thinks or wants the smart meter issue has got to top the list. 

After being exposed personally to the smart meter scam, I began calling senators and representatives not only here in my state, Minnesota, but in other states as well just to get their response. 

Without exception this is what I was told in every instance of contact in exactly this order:

  • I never heard of smart meters….what are they?
  • We haven’t had any other complaints about smart meters.
  • Smart meters are no worse than your cell phone. (false)
  • There is no credible evidence that says these meters are dangerous. (false)
  • This is a legal issue…hire an attorney.
  • We only make the laws so we don’t get into legal issues.
  • There is nothing we can do for you. Go back to your city council.

What are the chances? More

CPUC and PG&E: Misinformation, misrepresentation and attempted extortion

9 Comments

 

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

_________________________________________________________

The recent California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) public meeting in which one resident was told he could have his analog meter re-installed and the SMART Meter removed has resulted in CPUC saying that they would render a ruling on “allowing” citizens to opt out of the system of by 2012.  The idea that CPUC continues to misrepresent their authority and that of PG&E is astounding.  The thought that the California legislature and its governor sit idly by, silent, while this travesty takes place against the citizens of their state, is downright disgusting. 

Neither CPUC nor PG&E has the right or the authority to violate private property and the rights associated with that, not to mention the assault and violation of the individuals in their persons or bodies.  Neither do either of these corporations have the right to summarily and arbitrarily subject the citizenry to the provisions of a private contract they were not party to, and to force them to surrender or submit to what is in fact, a specifically designed military weapon( Bioeffects of selected non-lethal weapons pdf.) that can cause massive harm to the public.

Both CPUC and PG&E are operating under contract law.  There are several points that must be adhered to under this system.

  • All contracts must be in-kind.  Meaning corporation to corporation, or people to people, etc..
  • Must have “wet-ink” signatures.  This means assumed signatures or copies of signatures are not recognized as valid.
  • Equal consideration must be given to all parties.
  • There must be full disclosure.
  • Cannot be unconscionable or deceptive.  More

Wisconsin DATCP: A rogue agency continues its assault on milk producers

2 Comments

Paul Griepentrog/PPJ Reporter Wisconsin

________________________________________________

“A clear cut act of coercion, being forced to waive their rights just to market milk. “

____________________________________________ 

Yup! DATCP won again! As Mark and Jane Brothen pled no contest to charges of failure to register a premises.  

Unable to afford or procure competent counsel and lacking the ability to represent themselves left them with little choice, after all the state run education system falls grievously short of providing scholars of the necessary information to obtain due process of law, and deliberately so. 

Jubilant with their boot heel victory over another family farm Donna Gilson, spokesperson for DATCP, rushed to press somewhat prematurely as her announcement was three days prior to the entry in the court record.  An act in clear violation of Wisconsin Statutes  §943.201 except for one thing; Mark and Jane are licensed dairy producers and as part of the application for that license were forced to wave their privacy rights and allow DATCP to do whatever it wants with their information. 

Even when producers try and make a reservation of rights the heavy handed Cheryl Daniels wrote: 

 “If a person wants to be a dairy producer, they must submit the application as written.  If they want a license, they need to follow our rules.  Premises is a term under our statute. Have them resubmit the application or tell them it will be denied.”  

A clear cut act of coercion, being forced to waive their rights just to market milk.   More

Wisconsin continues its assault against independent agriculture

2 Comments

Paul Griepentrog (C) copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

Wisconsin Reports

Pretext

As it was my intent to deliver three articles in sequence I found my life had again been invaded Thursday morning by an act of vandalism, a person or persons unknown to me entered my barn (burglary) released my animals (a felony in Wisconsin) and opened the doors to the grain storage areas allowing the animals to engorge themselves with grain.  This occurrence coincided with other acts of aggression to individuals opposed to the comprehensive land use plan.  There were three snowmobiles operating unlawfully on the road that night, in the past anyone complaining about such activity has been subject to acts of aggression, as in one case where the complainant had a snowmobiler drive into his driveway and discharge a firearm at his house.   More

“LIVABLE COMMUNITIES” is a SOCIALIST TRAP!

1 Comment

 09-07-2010 4:34 pm – Tom DeWeese – American Policy Center
Senator Christopher Dodd has introduced a bill to enforce UN Agenda 21 policy on your community. It’s called the “Livable Communities Act” (S.1619). It will destroy your community. Here’s why:

S. 1619 “Livable Communities” act is on a fast track to passage!

S. 1619 is a blueprint for the transformation of our society into total federal control.

S.1619 will enforce federal Sustainable Development zoning and control of local communities.

S.1619 will create a massive new “development” bureaucracy —
(development Czar?)

S.1619 will drive up the cost of energy to heat and cool your home.

S.1619 will drive up the cost of gasoline as a way to get you out of your car.

S.1619 will force you to spend thousands on your home in order to comply.

S.1619 is NOT Voluntary – it will set up $4 billion in grants (TAX MONEY WE DON’T HAVE) that will force your community to comply.

Here are the facts:

Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) has authored a bill S.1619 titled the “Livable Communities Act.” It is one of the most dangerous bills to ever threaten our liberty. Worse even than the Obamacare scheme. More

NO FINANCIAL BANK BUYOUT OR BAILOUT!

Leave a comment

NO FINANCIAL BANK BUYOUT OR BAILOUT!

SCREW THOSE DAMN LIARS AND THIEVES!

 

Subject: Text of Financial Crisis Legislation

 

This is an OFFER that you simply can not refuse [because if you do the private Bankers and their MBA’a are going to crash your economy and send this country into another Great Depression] !

In short, you are going to give another 700 BILLION plus to the “private” Federal Reserve Corporation, et alii, and agree not to prosecute anyone involved in this perfidy … and you are told that this impunity will restore “accountability, responsibility and transparency” to the System [of extortion]:

Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-

reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be

reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Impunity. Not being punished for a crime or misdemeanor committed. The impunity of crimes is one of the most prolific sources whence they arise.

Impunity offers a continual bait to a delinquent {Impunitas continuum affectum tribuit delinquenti; 4 Co. 45, a; 5 Co. 109, a.};

Impunity always invites to greater crimes {Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat};

It concerns the commonwealth that crimes do not remain unpunished {Interest reipublicæ ne maleficia remaneant impunita; Jenk. Cent. 30, 31};

Evil deeds ought not to remain unpunished, and impunity affords continual incitement to the delinquent {Maleficia non debent remanere impunita, et impunitas continuum affectum tribuit delinquenti};

He who acts badly hates the light {Qui male agit odit lucem};

He who spares the guilty punishes the innocent {Qui parcit nocentibus innocentes punit};

The thing speaks for itself {Res ipsa loquitur};

The hope of impunity holds out a continual temptation to crime {Spes impunitatis continuum affectum tribuit delinquendi};

Rabon v. Rowen Memorial Hospital Inc., 152 S.E. 485 (1967) (Immunity fosters neglect and breeds irresponsibility while liability promotes care and caution, which caution and care is owed by the government to its people);

This was part one of a two part email sent to us annonymously.  If you know where this originated and who actually wrote it, please let us know.

%d bloggers like this: