Home

“We the People” vs. Kleptocracy

1 Comment

new-logo251_002Author:  Elaine Mickman

Author Contact: Court-gate@yahoo.com

At a time in society when inclusion seems to top the list for priority in government and many private entities, there is an entire and growing population of people simultaneously being treated sub-human as second-class citizens without rights over their own body and without access and supervision of their own property and income, and virtually, the right to their own existence as the result of either illegal Guardianships or the Unconstitutional Act of ordering-away Constitutional Rights.

There’s no denying that usurping Constitutional Rights is a form of cancel-culture-suppression and Official Oppression only achieved by the Courts superseding their authority and the Constitution.

Illegal Guardianships are corrupt “cancel-cartels” whose agenda is to rob unsuspecting individuals of their assets, income, and property. Guardianship strikes and expands beyond the elderly and includes targeting those in family court as well as those who are expecting monetary settlements that somehow comes to the attention of a Guardianship “gang”.

A wish-list outcome is predetermined and then the Court-system and/or Guardianship “gang” proceed with filings to create and justify a path that “follows the money-paved road”. No boundaries, no limits, no transparency, no laws. Manufacturing and fabrication of documents and tampering of records with cruel intentions is the scheme to “smash a life to grab the cash.”

Toxic officials or bureaucrats that are also on the naughty list include Court Prothonotaries and Clerks who can control or tamper dockets to “gate-keep” court access. Each court “player” is a significant piece in advancing fraudsters while obstructing a victim every step of the process. For example, the Prothonotary or Clerk of Court can impede filing for legal recourse by the Prothonotary stamping a filing late or defective so that a filing never reaches the Court for review.

Retaliation against whistleblowers who report and file Complaints can include, but is not limited to the denial of jobs, promotions, and even the denial of public assistance such as SNAP food stamps, LIHEAP heating assistance, and medical insurance for financially qualifying individuals by County Assistance employees falsifying Applications to disqualify people.

The judiciary self-determines if they are bias, prejudice or present a conflict regardless that most Judges are elected through campaigns funded by attorneys who expect a favorable ruling when a judge is elected on the bench. When Judicial misconduct is alleged, the Judicial Conduct Board is the entity where a Complaint is filed and is reviewed and determined. The PA JCB is self-policing and composed of sitting judges, privately-practicing attorneys, and some lay people appointed by the Governor, amounting to non-policing by Judicial colleagues.

The existing conflicts of interest are indisputable, but PA has also recently decided to add another layer of protection for the Judiciary called the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board when it is unclear if the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board is compliant with the PA Constitution. Where’s the additional protection for “we the people”?

Most law suits against Judges and government employees are swiftly dismissed by their claiming immunity regardless that the law only provides and protects with immunity if Judges and government employees are acting within the scope and boundaries of the law, and are not abridging the privileges and rights of “we the people.”

The Privileges and Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment provides that “no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privilegesand immunities of citizens of the United States.” 

U.S. Const. Amend XIV§1, Cl. 2.

Most, if not all, states have laws pertaining to what’s called sovereign immunity. Sovereign immunity in Pennsylvania falls under 1 Pa. C.S. § 2310 and protects with immunity to those in their individual and official capacity provided they are “acting within the scope of their duties”

While every case is unique and there is no once-size-fits-all, based on textbook, the judiciary can be sued if they violate the Hobbs Act under 18 USC 1951 and Civil Rights, and government employees can be sued under a Bivenssuit.

If records support an illegal or unjustified Guardianship, a Guardian could be potentially sued for “Abuse of Process” by misusing the filing of Guardianship for the distinct purpose of accomplishing another matter for which a Guardianship is not intended such as confiscating assets from a person unwilling to sign-away their property.

“An abuse of process is the unjustified or unreasonable use of legal proceedings or process to further a cause of action by an applicant or plaintiff in an action.“A respondent or defendant typically claims the other party or plaintiff is misusing or perverting the regularly issued court process not justified by the underlying legal action.” “The elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law jurisdictions are:(1) the existence of an ulterior purpose or motive underlying the use of process, and (2) some act in the use of the legal process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceedings.”

The courts are being weaponized against “we the people” in what is known as a Kleptocracy which is when the government steals from the people.

It can’t be overstated that the courts are terrorizing “we the people“, an “Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins.” John Locke, Book II of Two Treaties of Government.

The Judiciary failing to Rule by Law has devolved into “Ruling by Tyranny” so that the courts are effectively operating as “slaughterhouses” and countless statistics of “we the people” are the “slaughter” whether through the loss of life, liberty, or property. “If eyes are turned blind to the judiciary not Ruling by Law, then we’ll never see justice.”….Elaine Mickman

* Hobbs Act- Under 18 USC 1951 is a federal law prohibiting extortion by wrongful use of force or fear, or the attempt of these crimes affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

* Bivens Suit- A Bivens action generally refers to a lawsuit for damages when a federal officer who is acting in the color of federal authority allegedly violates the US Constitution by federal officers acting.

* Civil Rights 42 US 1983 (civil) / 18 US 241 (criminal)

* Conspiracy 42 US 1985 (civil) / 18 US 242 (criminal)

TS Radio Network: Probate Tribunals..The corruption is rampant

Leave a comment

bucard-1
Friday, December 3, 2021 at 7:00 CST

5:00 pm PST…6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST …8:00pm EST

Listen live  →Here←

All shows are archived so you can listen at your convenience.

CAll in ;number is 917-388-4520

Hit #1 if you wish to speak to the host.

Hosted by Marti Oakley with Coz Skaife

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tonight on TS Radio Network with  Coz and Marti

We are nearing the end of the year and its just about break time.  We have a lot to cover and will wind down for the break on the 17th.  We will cram in as much as we can before then.

Also joining us is Elaine Mickman, Author of  “Court-Gate…the Courts “Divorced from the Law” : Without Liberty or Justice at all” This book written from personal experience in the family court system where corruption is business as usual. 

Coz will give us this weeks Hog Report.  The Hog Report has become one of the most popular segments of the shows.  Seems everybody has encountered them!

The Hog Report is sponsored by Shenanigans in Montgomery Cty on Facebook

 

Is 18 US 2071 a Law for Convenience?

Leave a comment

new-logo251_002Author:  Elaine Mickman

Readers can contact at Courtgate@yahoo.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Is 18 US 2071 a Law for Convenience?

Are we to believe our modern country is a civilized society based on law when case after case spotlights the legal system has devolved so that the laws are only conveniences to be selectively applied for some
not applied or weaponized against others? Did you, or anyone in your family, or anyone you know have a case for which any records that were deposited with a clerk, officer of any court, or public office, and actual records were concealed, mutilated, obliterated, destroyed, falsified or “magically” removed?  If so, it’s possible that 18 US 2071 may apply.
For example, were your records or the records of someone “near and dear” to you willfully and unlawfully concealed, removed, obliterated or mutilated to ensure justifying an illegitimate Guardianship matter? Did County Assistance willfully and unlawfully conceal, remove obliterate, mutilate or falsify records in
your case or the case of someone you know to deprive needed benefits?
Were records willfully and unlawfully concealed, removed, mutilated, obliterated, destroyed or falsified in
your Social Security or Disability case matter?
I know a woman whose retirement account from an out-of-state insurance company (Interstate Commerce) which required her signature to execute was falsified by the signature of her ex-spouse and then attorneys, who are Officer’s of the Court, had the document deposited with the court for signing-off.
This Pennsylvania senior citizen’s retirement was “signed-away” by falsification of record that was deposited and filed with a court clerk.  And it can’t be overlooked that emptying out retirement accounts often leave the person subject to penalty and taxes for a pension or account that they never received.
It has become more common than most realize for senior citizen’s medical records to be falsified and filed with a court as a justification to obtain guardianship where their assets and retirement funds are confiscated and stolen by record concealment, mutilation, destruction and falsification which is subject to 18 US 2071.

More

LAWS FOR CONVENIENCE

1 Comment

Please welcome a new addition to PPJ writers:  Elaine Mickman.  Elaine has been dragged, stomped on, torn up and left in the dust after dealing with corrupt family courts.

“After the court system “asset-stripped” this woman and “perfected injustice“, the court ordered-away and canceled-out her Constitutional Rights to silence her and censor her cases plagued with fraud and “cover-ups” by “gatekeeping” her court-access, amounting to nothing less than a “judicial-hit-job.” The book is intended to inform and educate the public, and “sound an alarm” to prompt positive reform.”

Court-Gate…the Courts “Divorced from the Law” : Without Liberty or Justice at all

Available here

TS Radio Network: Christine Morrison … author of Judicial Criminals

Leave a comment

Friday, February 12, 2021 at 7:00 CST

5:00 pm PST…6:oo pm MST … 7:00 pm CST …8:00 pm EST

Listen live →HERE! 

More

TS Radio: In the Mix–Coz & Marti with guest Elaine Mickman

Leave a comment

 

Join us live Friday, May 22, 2020 at 7:30 pm CST!

More

TS Radio Network: In the Mix with Coz & Marti

Leave a comment

 

Join us live Sunday, January 5, 2020 at 7:00 pm CST!

More

%d bloggers like this: