Home

The Overhyped Measles Epidemic of 2019

Leave a comment

By Dr. John Reizer

Recently, there’s been a tremendous amount of disinformation being discussed through the mainstream media about outbreaks and epidemics concerning measles. And of course the media coverage is blaming the present epidemic on anti-vaxxers; those dreaded conspiracy nuts that refuse to receive vaccines and genuflect to the church of medicine.

Public health officials regularly release reports to the mainstream media about epidemics, pandemics and outbreaks of diseases. Then they encourage everybody to rush out to medical facilities in order to receive vaccines to protect themselves and loved ones against the named diseases.

Understand the Deceptive Terminology Being Used

The words Endemic, Epidemic, Pandemic, and Outbreak, are often used interchangeably by government regulating agencies as well as by the mainstream media companies to purposely mislead citizens about the dangers associated with certain diseases that may or may not be affecting or impacting various communities at any given time.

Endemic is the term used to describe a disease that regularly exists in a certain community. For example, measles is supposedly no longer endemic in the United States because there has been an absence of reported, continuous measles transmission cases for 12 months or longer. According to government regulating agencies, the disease is only transmitted in the United States by unvaccinated citizens that visit foreign territories and then bring it back home. These individuals supposedly infect other US citizens that have not been vaccinated. More

Advertisements

The Religious Cult of Medicine

5 Comments

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Although a small minority of us don’t think of them and their vocation in this way, medical doctors and the profession of medicine are perceived by the vast majority of people as priests working in a church. The entire structure of the medical profession has been intentionally designed to mirror a religious experience.

When you walk into a house of worship, you enter a domain that is considered sacred by the members of the congregation. Inside a church, temple, synagogue or any other religious chamber, there are specific rules that are generally understood and followed by its members. Out of respect for the belief system, any types of criticism, skepticism or questions concerning the veracity of the organization’s major premise are off limits. In other words, members of religious congregations can never publicly question the church about anything.

In medicine, the doctor (priest, minister, rabbi) customarily wears a white gown (robe) that absolutely identifies him as the high priest in the congregation (practice). Within that practice there are nurses (nuns) that assist the doctor in taking care of patients (members of the congregation) when they become ill (possessed by evil microbes). Patients do not usually question  a doctor’s (minister’s) advice.

There are a variety of techniques (rituals) the profession of medicine uses to rid the body of diseases (evil spirits). Some of these techniques include introducing synthetic drugs (holy water) in patients, mass produced by petrochemical companies. In other situations, doctors cut out diseases in the body by performing surgeries (exorcisms) in an effort to remove infected tissues and organs (possessed body parts).

Question the intentions or integrity of the medical man and his large support group of medical personnel, and you will be looked upon by the citizens of most communities as a nut job (the devil). Question the medical protocols (biblical passages) that have been written by the petrochemical corporations and firmly established within the base curricula of every medical school program in the world, and you will be labeled as a charlatan, a quack or a pseudo-scientist. More

And Now The End Of Brexit

3 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

If something looks, smells or tastes like a conspiracy, chances are pretty damn good it is one.

A long time ago, powerful think-tanks got together and figured out a way to stop the masses from putting any credibility into ideas that governments might regularly conspire against their own citizenry. Their clever plan was to popularize a specific label that would, for all intents and purposes, inoculate the masses against believing the obvious. The label that was selected was “Conspiracy Theory.” According to a Freedom of Information request by the New York Times in 1976, the label “Conspiracy Theory” was made into a weaponized term to discredit minority groups of people from pushing conspiracy agendas that questioned the veracity of government reports.

The “Conspiracy Theory” label can very effectively defuse a specific problem before it ever has a chance to breathe. Whenever something big occurs that stinks of a massive conspiracy, the powers that be immediately inoculate the masses against such thought behavior by injecting the “Conspiracy Theory” label into the public domain. It goes something like this:

“Yesterday’s terror attack is already being dubbed as a false flag event by the lunatic fringe and other conspiracy theorists.”

When the hypnotized public read and hear such statements from the mainstream media companies, they automatically close their eyes and cover their ears with regards to anything that deviates from officialdom. In reality, the masses are routinely immunized against logic by coming into contact with this cleverly weaponized label. No matter how blatantly obvious the truth might be concerning a specific incident, the large majority of people worldwide will be unable to embrace anything other than what has been disseminated by the government’s script writers.

More

The Medical Industrial Complex: Never A Cure to be Found

4 Comments

wp-image-879162634

By Dr. John Reizer

It’s vitally important to understand how the medical industrial complex operates in order to understand why there have never been any cures to any diseases.

Now I understand that some people like to point out that surgeons can cure tonsillitis, appendicitis, infected gallbladders, and a plethora of other conditions by removing diseased tissues. But that’s not technically a cure because the surgeon is cutting out the disease and not really curing anything. If done often enough, this practice would make the patient disappear.

In addition to those claims, others like to point out that Polio and Smallpox were cured through vaccination programs. This is also not accurate because both of these diseases declined through natural adaptations within human physiology, better sanitation, better public health practices, and some very clever statistical reporting by regulating agencies that reclassified Polio as viral meningitis after vaccines were administered. This is also the case with other diseases that were supposedly brought under control with vaccines. All of these claimed diseases declined in locations where vaccines were not administered, and often at a faster rate than the places where the medications were used. But we never hear about these facts.

In order to cure anything, a physician or the medicine he or she applies would have to cause the diseases involved to be replaced with new, healthy cells and tissues that are able to function normally from a physiological standpoint. This criteria is not even close to being satisfied in modern allopathic medicine. Only the body can cure specific diseases or more appropriately named, physiological expressions.

The medical industrial complex, for the most part, owns the named physiological expressions we commonly refer to as diseases. In reality, there are no diseases in existence. There are only physiological expressions that occur when the body is functioning in a state of ease (health) and also when the body is functioning in a state of dis-ease (loss of health).

Long ago, the medical industrial complex categorized various physiological expressions of dis-ease and named them as individual diseases. They own the rights to the named entities, and the surgical and chemical treatment protocols associated with them. More

I Caught the Flu And Survived

Leave a comment

“Contrary to popular belief, there’s no scientific evidence that flu vaccines are the best way to prevent catching the flu. In fact, evidence shows that people that receive a flu vaccine transmit the disease to others at a much higher rate than those not receiving the vaccines. It’s called viral shedding. The CDC has published misleading information about the safety and effectiveness of flu shots and also about the number of deaths that occur each year because of the flu.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

By Dr. John Reizer

I caught the dreaded flu virus several weeks ago. It had been about two and a half years since I last experienced any sickness whatsoever. And that episode had been limited to a simple cold that left me with a mild sore throat and some congestion for a few days.

A week prior to catching the flu, I had been bragging to one of my patients about how healthy I was and how I attributed my good health to eating properly, getting plenty of daily exercise and receiving regular chiropractic care. This recipe has always kept my nervous and immune systems working at a very efficient level.

Then out of nowhere, I had the damn flu.

I had been taking care of a lot of patients prior to catching the flu that had been experiencing flu like symptoms. A few of the patients I had seen even told me they had tested positive for the virus. And this was after they had taken the flu vaccine at a local drugstore down the street from my office.

This particular flu virus had me feeling pretty miserable within a few hours after the first symptoms appeared. It started quite innocently enough with me not being able to clear my throat. It then caused my throat to quickly become sore, and then the intense fever kicked in. The fever went to 104 degrees Fahrenheit and it lasted for 19 hours. I let it run its course like I always do. The fever dismantles the flu virus and actually prevents it from being able to replicate.

I drank plenty of water to prevent dehydration and secured a few blankets to keep me warm. I was shivering quite a bit. I propped myself up on a reclining chair and watched television and of course plenty of television commercials about how to fight off the flu with over-the-counter medicines.  The commercials told me I should take drugs to lower my fever, break up the congestion in my chest, dry up my runny nose, and stop my persistent coughing. WHAT A JOKE! More

Childhood Vaccine Warning Labels Should be advertised on Television

2 Comments

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer

Wouldn’t it be great if every mandated or recommended childhood vaccine was forced to be advertised on television each evening along with its applicable warning label and associated ingredients?

20190218_212629

Drug companies would cringe at the thought of having to advertise certain vaccines that have already been forced upon the public. That’s why you never see the Rubella, tDap, chickenpox or Measles vaccines featured in ads like other drugs being pushed on a daily basis.

If the government mandated the public consumption of drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis for precautionary measures do you think big pharma would continue to advertise these products? No!

Can you imagine if the government mandated the taking of antidepressants for everyone because studies found that too many people were depressed and it was causing an epidemic of suicidal behavior in the nation?

Do you think the mandated consumption of antidepressants would infuriate the public? Or would they sit back and roll up their sleeves and get jabbed? Would we see medical cheerleaders posting remarks on social media about what a good idea it was to mandate the public consumption of antidepressants or whatever poison the legal drug cartel wanted to sell?

It’s complete insanity that a governing body can force its citizens to take any drug at any time. All drugs come with serious risks and no one should ever be forced to take any drug without their consent.

What do you think about this subject?

Are Anti-Vaxxers Crazy?

1 Comment

By Dr. John Reizer

Anti-vaxxer – a person who refuses to vaccinate their child because they believe the medication is more dangerous than the benefits they allegedly offer.

Are anti-vaxxers crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists? More important, are anti-vaxxers causing the members of society to become more at risk from dangerous and contagious diseases than they should be? These are both fair questions to explore because a lot of medical experts have been bringing up these questions on national television programs as well as other mainstream media forums.

According to some mainstream medical sources, many diseases are currently returning or making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their children.

First of all let me preface my little article by writing that if vaccines truly conferred immunity to the people receiving them, there would be absolutely no need for the vaccinated patients to fear outbreaks of certain diseases coming from the unvaccinated folks. The only people at risk, theoretically speaking, should be those individuals not vaccinated.

Truth be told, a minority of American healthcare consumers have become a lot more educated in the past 5-10 years and have intelligently concluded that the risks associated with these medicines far out-way the published benefits. This in itself is a scary concept for the drug manufacturers (vaccine makers) who have a financial obligation to their shareholders to make profits. And that is exactly what they have been doing each year. These multinational corporations are making billions of dollars annually while putting out products that are supposedly designed to prevent the spread of diseases. In actuality, the vaccine programs of today have most likely caused the proliferation of many diseases at breakneck speed. More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: