Home

COVID-19 Vaccine Makers Using Aborted Fetal Cells

Leave a comment

 

COGFORLIFE.ORG

For the second time in less than a week, Children of God for Life is calling out the pharmaceutical industry for the use of aborted fetal cell lines in potential Covid-19 vaccines.

On March 25th, the organization exposed Moderna’s use of the aborted fetal cell line HEK 293.

This time it’s Janssen Pharmaceutical, owned by Johnson and Johnson, that is using their PER C6 Ad5 technology, derived from an aborted baby’s retinal tissue. Dr. Alex van der Eb revealed the information on this abortion at FDA hearings in 2001:

So I isolated retina from a fetus, from a healthy fetus as far as could be seen, of 18 weeks old. There was nothing special with a family history or the pregnancy was completely normal up to the 18 weeks, and it turned out to be a socially indicated abortus – abortus provocatus, and that was simply because the woman wanted to get rid of the fetus… what was written down was unknown father, and that was, in fact, the reason why the abortion was requested.”

Adding insult to injury, Dr. van der Eb went on to admit:

PER C6 was made just for pharmaceutical manufacturing of adenovirus vectors… And then pharmaceutical industry standard. I realize that this sounds a bit commercial, but PER C6 were made for that particular purpose.”

Not only are there moral problems with using aborted fetal cells, but the PER C6 Ad5 technology also has safety concerns that have been raised with the FDA as well. More

Virus propaganda: A psyop in progress

3 Comments

John Leckrone

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For the last couple of weeks I have been telling everyone this corona virus issue is a giant psychological operation. I need to be very clear here. I am not saying that this virus does not exist nor am I saying that people are not dying from it. What I am saying is that it is an extremely convenient excuse to continue to perpetuate the power of the tyrannical corporations masquerading as “government”. It is also very convenient that most of the dead are older people with other medical conditions.

When this is all over the new “normal” will not look anything like a couple of months ago in 2019. We are being conditioned to accept seeing more government agents with costumes and guns hanging out where they were not located at a year ago. I am having flashbacks of Nazi Germany. Never forget that all 10 planks of the communist manifesto are in full effect in America. Additionally all of these tests are a great way to get people to give up their DNA so that other tests can be run as well.

I have a first hand view of how effective this psychological operation has become. I cannot get into specific details of who, thankfully no one in my family, but I will state that a woman I know has gone over the top because of the virus propaganda. Her entire world is about this virus. She watches the “news” (read propaganda) for hours on end regarding this plague. I see how it is affecting her and thus her significant other as well. It truly is sad. There is nothing wrong with being careful and using common sense to prevent the spread of this and other viruses. It does become a problem when these actions become stupid though.

The people that work with the man scratch their heads in bewilderment. This woman makes completely unrealistic demands of her room mate with regards to both his work and the people that work beside him. It became so bad at one point he asked her if she was willing to pay all of the bills and he would stay at home. As a selfish, narcissistic, greedy and tyrannical dictator she decided to shut up at that point. The people that work with him have by extension given her the dream life few people have enjoyed and she obviously does not want to give that up. In her defense she is a woman in her mid 60’s but still her wishes are completely unrealistic and bordering on insanity. This woman is the micro version of the macro system being rolled out. This thing called “government” whose agents are making just as significant and unrealistic demands upon people is getting more heavy handed by the day. I am now waiting for the first man or woman to be shot here in America for violating a prison style lock down. I have first hand knowledge that this has already happened in other parts of the world.

More

Coronavirus vs. the Mass Surveillance State: Which Poses the Greater Threat?

1 Comment

John Whitehead’s Commentary

Coronavirus vs. the Mass Surveillance State: Which Poses the Greater Threat?

John Whitehead

“If, as it seems, we are in the process of becoming a totalitarian society in which the state apparatus is all-powerful, the ethics most important for the survival of the true, free, human individual would be: cheat, lie, evade, fake it, be elsewhere, forge documents, build improved electronic gadgets in your garage that’ll outwit the gadgets used by the authorities.”—Philip K. Dick

Emboldened by the citizenry’s inattention and willingness to tolerate its abuses, the government has weaponized one national crisis after another in order to expands its powers.

The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on illegal immigration, asset forfeiture schemes, road safety schemes, school safety schemes, eminent domain: all of these programs started out as legitimate responses to pressing concerns and have since become weapons of compliance and control in the police state’s hands.

It doesn’t even matter what the nature of the crisis might be—civil unrest, the national emergencies, “unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters”—as long as it allows the government to justify all manner of government tyranny in the so-called name of national security.

Now we find ourselves on the brink of a possible coronavirus contagion.

I’ll leave the media and the medical community to speculate about the impact the coronavirus will have on the nation’s health, but how will the government’s War on the Coronavirus impact our freedoms?

For a hint of what’s in store, you can look to China—our role model for all things dystopian—where the contagion started.

In an attempt to fight the epidemic, the government has given its surveillance state apparatus—which boasts the most expansive and sophisticated surveillance system in the world—free rein. Thermal scanners using artificial intelligence (AI) have been installed at train stations in major cities to assess body temperatures and identify anyone with a fever. Facial recognition cameras and cell phone carriers track people’s movements constantly, reporting in real time to data centers that can be accessed by government agents and employers alike. And coded color alerts (red, yellow and green) sort people into health categories that correspond to the amount of freedom of movement they’re allowed: “Green code, travel freely. Red or yellow, report immediately.”

Mind you, prior to the coronavirus outbreak, the Chinese surveillance state had already been hard at work tracking its citizens through the use of some 200 million security cameras installed nationwide. Equipped with facial recognition technology, the cameras allow authorities to track so-called criminal acts, such as jaywalking, which factor into a person’s social credit score.

Social media credit scores assigned to Chinese individuals and businesses categorize them on whether or not they are “good” citizens. A real-name system—which requires people to use government-issued ID cards to buy mobile sims, obtain social media accounts, take a train, board a plane, or even buy groceries—coupled with social media credit scores ensures that those blacklisted as “unworthy” are banned from accessing financial markets, buying real estate or travelling by air or train. Among the activities that can get you labeled unworthy are taking reserved seats on trains or causing trouble in hospitals.

More

A Safe Vaccine is One that is Never Used!

Leave a comment

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

The vaccine theory is well protected within the field of medicine. In other words, if anyone speaks or writes negatively about vaccines, he or she is immediately attacked by the pharmaceutical industrial complex. This is especially true with regards to anti vaccine articles authored online.

There are a plethora of paid shills employed by pharmaceutical companies and other agencies that police the Internet comment boards. Collectively speaking, their job is to squash/ridicule any commentary that might suggest or prove that vaccines are not safe for healthcare consumers. In addition, any medical professional that speaks or writes negatively about vaccination theory will assuredly be ostracized from the medical profession.

The research that proves there are serious risks associated with administering vaccines to human beings and other living animals exists, but it is intentionally made difficult to access. Such research has clearly demonstrated that all vaccines are direct transporters of dangerous products into the human body. This in turn permanently damages the human immune system by causing targeted suppression of normal physiology that is necessary to have a healthy population free of disease.

Vaccines are designed to create antibodies in living systems that ultimately suppress biology. The suppression systems realized by these designer medicines vary, but can be used to achieve whatever effect the engineers that make them desire. This includes the planned proliferation of specific diseases as well as infertility challenges within specifically selected segments of the human population.

Within the past few years many campaigns have been launched by the powers that be inviting everybody and their uncle to send off their DNA to independent companies in order to uncover secrets about their ancestral tree. This might not be such a great idea because specific individuals as well as larger segments of the population could potentially be targeted for sterilization or harm from designer diseases.

If the wrong people get their hands on your DNA samples, you could be in trouble. People should protect their DNA as if it were their personal financial information. You don’t want a data breach taking place with regards to your personal DNA information. That kind of stolen data loaded into a vaccine could be a serious problem for all of us.

Take the time to watch the video below:

FREEDOM IN THE 21 CENTURY

1 Comment

Author, Chuck Frank

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

     While the 4th of July will be celebrated this week I will remember what those faithful patriots accomplished back in 1776 after the Declaration of Independence went into affect.  They fought for freedom and won.  By the 21 century American soldiers, Marines, the Navy and the Air Force continue to be used around the world in various military actions which has obviously not always been for the cause of freedom.  There have been other issues involved behind the scenes whether it be the lust of power, oil, gold or poppy fields.

Since 9/11 fighting terrorism has been used as an excuse to invade foreign countries in the Middle East.  Yet, there are many issues that now cloud this mission which has not only affected countries outside of our borders but at home as well. And by now, in 2019, the entire concept of freedom has taken a back seat to over taxation, global encounters whether it be war, climate change, environmentalism, sustainability, red tape, bureaucratic overreach or the outrageous and out of control legalism that now cuts into the very heart of freedom. More

Why Do They Want Our DNA?

4 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

Why are we constantly being encouraged by television shows and associated commercials to supply our DNA to different corporate entities?

Whether it’s for disease screenings or to locate long lost relatives, is it really a good idea to give out our DNA to strangers?

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

There’s an important reason not to have your DNA tested by companies that are trying to help you  screen different diseases or to find distant family members. The DNA information that you are providing is being collected by companies that can sell your private genetic secrets to Big Pharma, insurance companies and government agencies that might use the data against you.

Think of it this way; would you voluntarily hand out your social security number to strangers? Of course you wouldn’t. If someone gets hold of your social security number, he or she could steal your identity and cause you lots of financial problems. We all know this and go to a lot of trouble to protect ourselves from identity thieves.

The same mindset and caution should be practiced when it comes to DNA. DNA contains all of the unique biochemical secrets concerning our bodies and the bodies of our ancestors. When we are protective of our genetic codes, we’re not only protecting ourselves, we’re being protective of everybody in our family tree. It’s a big responsibility and one we should take very seriously.

There are plenty of people in the world that have nefarious agendas. Don’t be so eager to give them your secret genetic codes. Trust me when I write that this is not a very good idea. What you don’t really understand could quite honestly come back to hurt you and your loved ones.

What do you think about this subject?

USDA Makes GMOs Disappear

Leave a comment

Alliance for Natural Health USA

The Pulse of Natural Health Newsletter

Stay informed about what is hot in Washington and the states about natural health

It’s official: the “mandatory” GMO labeling rule will obscure more than it makes transparent. Action Alert!

The USDA has released its final GMO labeling rule, and it’s not good. As we feared when the agency released its proposal earlier this year, the so-called GMO labeling law will apply only to a narrow set of foods. Congress and the USDA have offered a number of loopholes and exemptions to food companies, undermining any semblance of a consumer’s right to know. It’s as if the USDA asked the food industry to write the rule themselves.

The problems start right at the foundation. The agency has decided to use the term “bioengineered”—a term many Americans may not be familiar with—rather than GMO. When the proposal was released, we pointed out that this is straight out of an Orwellian playbook. Many Americans know the term “GMO” and can connect it to the labeling debate—so the government decides to use a different term that sounds more innocuous. If the government was actually concerned with communicating information clearly to consumers, they would simply use the term “GMO” and not other terminology with which Americans may not be familiar.

The problems continue with the definition of “bioengineered.” The final rule defines bioengineered as a food that 1) contains genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques and 2) for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature”—essentially, combining DNA from two different sources, usually two different organisms.

More

Jon Rappoport: A universal flu vaccine: the mad science solution

Leave a comment

Jon Rappoport’s Blog

(To join our email list, click here.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“If you’re going to alter humans, for example, to make many of them more docile and weak, and some of them stronger, in order to restructure society, you want everyone under the umbrella. No exceptions. No exemptions.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has launched efforts to create a vaccine that would protect people from most flu strains, all at once, with a single shot.

Over the years, I’ve written many articles refuting claims that vaccines are safe and effective, but we’ll put all that aside for the moment and follow the bouncing ball.

Massachusetts Senator and big spender, Ed Markey, has introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal flu-vaccine project. You like something, it sounds good, you know nothing about the details, throw money at it.

Here is a paragraph from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches:

“NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…”

This is quite troubling, if you know what the phrase “DNA vaccine” means. It refers to what the experts are touting as the next generation of immunizations.

Instead of injecting a piece of a virus into a person, in order to stimulate the immune system, synthesized genes would be shot into the body. This isn’t traditional vaccination anymore. It’s “protective gene therapy”.

In any such method, where genes are edited, deleted, added, no matter what the pros say, there are always “unintended consequences,” to use their polite phrase. The ripple effects scramble the genetic structure in numerous unknown ways.

Here is the inconvenient truth about DNA vaccines—

They will permanently alter your DNA.

More

JAMA WARNS FLU VACCINES ARE KILLING SENIOR CITIZENS

1 Comment

By HN

Here is the proof that flu shots are killing seniors from the JAMA.

Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat.  As so it was in Hitler’s Germany.    In the 1930’s the Nazis implemented a eugenics depopulation program regarding the elderly, the sick, mentally challenged and physically deformed called T-4.

Image result for HITLER T4

Wall Street and the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations are responsible for funding Hitler’s rise to power and the eugenics programs the Nazis modeled their T-4 program from American Eugenicists to rid the Germany and the Aryan race of what Hitler called “useless eaters”.

Image result for HITLER ROCKEFELLER EUGENICS

In fact, these powerful forces continue their eugenics research to this day, branching out into DNA and genetics in their quest to rid the world of not only all disease, but all flawed humans.  Their goal is to create the perfect human while weeding out the unwanted and useless elements of our society by overtly and covertly depopulating the planet to manageable levels, namely 500,000,000.

Sound’s crazy, doesn’t it?  But its true.  You can’t make this stuff up.

And what about the rise in autism from vaccines?  1 in 10,000  Americans had autism in 1980 with 6 vaccines given to children.  Today more than 60 vaccines are given to children and autism rates are 1 in 68.

In 20 years what will America look like and what will be done with all of these millions and millions of autistic grown-ups?      Hitler has the answer,  a neo-T-4 depopulation program.

And what about this elderly “health aid”? Could it be a coincidence that this company titled their product T-4 by accident, or as a sick joke, or maybe it is something more sinister hidden right before our very eyes.

READ MORE HERE!

 

 

Human or not so much? Life after Vaccines and other assaults on human existence

11 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley        © copyright 2014 All rights reserved

______________________________________________________________

“In fact, those who create these lethal injections have no way of knowing or predicting how these foreign genes are going to affect anyone, much less the overall population.  What is worse is that they apparently are conducting experiments on the public at large to see just what does happen when you shoot a human being full of chicken or dog DNA.”

_________________________________________________________________

Between the bio-pirates who are destroying the natural world with their unnatural frankenfood popuproducts and crops, and vaccine makers and pushers of other pharmaceutical assaults on the populations of the world,  we are adrift in a sea of mad scientists. Life on earth is being irrevocably altered.

The growing damage to the environment, food quality, and quality of life on this planet is readily apparent.  As a result, at what point do we lose our humanity?  And, at what point will genetic testing and DNA results be used to determine that many of us no longer qualify to be listed as “human”?  If this should happen, what will be done with, or to, those deemed to not have a high enough percentage of human DNA to qualify us as anything more than a lesser animal?  Further, who would make this determination?

At this point in time, this may seem to be far-fetched.  But try as I might, I cannot come up with one rational, logical reason for injecting via vaccines, the DNA of other human beings (human diploid cells), dogs, pigs, chickens and what ever else ran through the lab that day into the bodies of newborns, right up to those in old age.  These strands of DNA from animals and other humans are transfective.  This means they seek out the existing DNA and attach themselves to it, literally infecting it with foreign information, altering the original DNA forever.  The child is no longer the person they were intended to be, they can’t be because the infection caused by foreign non-related species has permanently damaged and changed the original DNA.  This can change not only the mental attributes, but may also begin altering the physical attributes in successive generations as the new genetic expressions override the original DNA.

In fact, those who create these lethal injections have no way of knowing or predicting how these foreign genes are going to affect anyone, much less the overall population.  What is worse is that they apparently are conducting experiments on the public at large to see just what does happen when you shoot a human being full of chicken or dog DNA.

The effects of vaccines on the elderly appears to manifest itself in an epidemic of brain decay in various forms as the number of elderly claimed to be suffering from these diseases is steadily increasing as targeted vaccines for the elderly rise simultaneously.

As the number of childhood vaccines increases, so do the number of cases of autism and other brain function disorders.

Transgenic: One jab at a time ?

Knowing as most of us do these days, that few governments around the world put any value in their populations, what would make any one of us think that our government, notorious for its disdain for the general public, would have our best interest at heart?

(Q). Why would our benevolent (sarc) government stand idly by, while the very building blocks of life, our genetic structure is damaged and manipulated by pharmaceutical manufacturers and other collectives of sociopath’s as these fools tamper with the structure of our very existence?  More

The emergence of Vaccine induced Diseases

38 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

 ___________________________________________

What government commissions the developement of a special virus for which there is no known human immune response?  Ours did.  Who were they intending to use this virus on? Apparently, us. 

______________________________________________________

On virtually every level, whether it is food, water, medications or the contamination of our environment across the board including the air we breathe, we, as human beings, are under attack.  The view of the worlds’ populations by corporate, scientific, pharmaceutical, military and even our respective governments is, one of contempt.  None view the populations of the earth as anything more than potential test subjects for a wide array of experimentations of all kinds.  We are the test rats in the maze. In fact, we are considered disposable and detested by the world’s elite.  

Vaccines, disease, death:

What are we subjecting our infants, toddlers and young children to? And even ourselves, as adults?  Every jab of the vaccine needle injects a DNA altering soup and infects the new host with live and thought to be dead viruses supposedly because this will protect us from some infection or disease. The injections also contain carcinogens, heavy metals, wild viruses, mutated proteins, and the dna in the vaccine can be transfective and recombinant, meaning it can combine with human DNA and mutate.  More

The new eugenics: Life in our vast chemical vats

20 Comments

Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________

Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks.  In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”.  [pp.167-169]  Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931 “

______________________________________________

As far back as the late 1800’s, maybe even earlier, has been a concerted effort by collections of individuals who somehow view themselves as superior  to the general population to institute eugenics; a system of  controlled breeding of those they viewed as inferior.  The American Eugenics Society formed the blueprint for what was later used in Nazi Germany to systematically purge Europe of those they found undesirable based on race, intellectual capacity, infirmities, social rejections, physical traits and even age.  We’ve come a long way, baby.  

Eugenics has been transformed, re-created, re-packaged and has a shiny new image signified by the systematic poisoning of the world’s populations through the use of chemicals, vaccines, lethal medications, chemtrails and efforts to genetically alter food to achieve a soft kill.  In order to make this selective genetic machine operate efficiently, global efforts are being implemented to collect the DNA of every human being on earth.  It is our DNA that must be altered, rendered inefficient and damaged, allowing the manipulation and exploitation coveted by the scientific industrialists. 

“Utilizing scientific technique in biology, only millionaires would be served real meat; everyone else would eat synthetic beefsteaks.  In the main, food would be manufactured in “vast chemical factories”.  [pp.167-169]  Bertrand Russell The Scientific Outlook (1931 

Is this not where we are now?  The food in our stores is irradiated, contaminated with gmo’s, loaded with chemicals, preservatives, dyes, residual pesticides, herbicides, residual vaccines, hormones, antibiotics and foods created from combining the genes of unrelated species and from cloning.  Our food supply, so infected with toxins of all kinds produced for no other reason than to manipulate ownership of the food supply for profit by bio-pirates, now presents a threat to the health of human beings and poses immediate danger to the environment.    More

DNA, HHS, and TSA : Which of These Things Might Be Part Of The Other?

5 Comments

Note The Happy Compliant Smile!

If the American Public wants to fly, they had better get used to opening up and surrendering their DNA. At least that is the proposal put forward by the following report:

New portable DNA screener to debut this summer

As with other DNA tests, the process begins with a sample collected on a swab, typically from inside the mouth. The sample is placed in a disposable cartridge, and the analyzer does the rest of the work.

“It’s the same process that occurs in the lab today,” Miles said. But “it will drastically make the system more efficient.” More

Food shortages: Creating a crisis to force global food control

9 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved 

__________________________________________

Apparently the plan is to defile the land, livestock and food supplies and then starve us into accepting some food-like product that has no nutritional value and that may also be a hazard to our health.   

__________________________________________

A shortage of food is being intentionally staged around the world.  Apparently, if we resist the theft and seizure of food production and supply by bio-pirates and facilitated by government puppets, we will be intentionally starved into submission.  Threats of the food shortage are constantly launched into “lame stream media” as a warning to the rest of us that we had better comply or face the fate of those poorer nations where millions are suffering from famine or death from lack of food.  More

Coming Soon to You: Massive DNA Destruction

3 Comments

J. Speer-Williams (c)Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

______________________________________________

Metaphysicians tell us that an individual’s DNA composition approximates one’s consciousness, and vice versa: One’s consciousness determines one’s DNA structure. Attack one, you attack the other. Improve one and you improve the other.____________________________________

Mainstream Doctors Fritz-Albert Popp and Bruce Lipton both tell us that our DNA appears to be the vital link between our physicality and spirituality. More

S.510: And congress moves against the people once again. Who will protect America from Congress and the USDA/FDA?

2 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved 

__________________________________________

The Money Trail

http://www.opencongress.org/money_trail

Go here to find out how much each of our elected officials has been collecting from the lists of supporters of this bill. Then read the lists of supporters: it’s a who’s who of biotech, and big AG.  If you can read these lists and still come away thinking this bill is about food safety, stop reading here; we can’t do anything else for you.

______________________________________________

If ever there was a reason to vote the bums and the bumettes out, surely the coming vote on S.510, The Assault on Domestic Agriculture euphemistically called a “Food Modernization Act”, would be that reason.  A “yes” vote on this bill is a vote against the sovereignty of the United States and wholesale capitulation to unlawful trade and harmonization agreements including Codex Alimentarius. Nothing in this Act is intended to, or will, secure the food supply and make it safe.  The safety of food will only be accomplished by keeping corporate federal agencies out of your state!  

The Federal government is once again, knowingly entering into a area where they have no valid constitutional authority and can claim no enabling act or constitutional clause, as a source from which they could derive authority over agriculture.  The misinterpretation of the commerce clause, knowingly misrepresented, cannot facilitate the enactment of this Act into positive, enforceable, law. 

Congress, lacking any constitutional authority, is fully aware they can confer no mandate onto the states causing them to comply with any portion of this Act, has inserted provisions into the Act ordering private corporate contracting to take place between the federal corporations known as the USDA and FDA and other federal corporations, and the state corporations designated by each governor to act as agents on behalf of the state.  This is the only way any of these agencies can gain access to the states; your governor will open the door!  More

GOVERNMENTAL ATROCITIES HAVE EXPLODED SINCE WW II.

1 Comment

J. Speer-Williams (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved 

 ___________

Former president Herbert Hoover wrote, “The Use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul … The Japanese were prepared to negotiate all the way from February 1945, up to and before the time the atomic bombs were dropped [in Aug. 1945].”

_______________________________

Down through the annuals of history, central governments have been notorious in their consistent and repeated crimes against humanity; but perhaps, at no time were their crimes more heinous than during the years of the Second World War.

Since WWII, however, the severity and magnitude of governmental crimes have exploded exponentially. And, the explosions started in a monstrous way after the Japanese nation had lost its ability to wage war: It was then that US president Harry S. Truman issued his Executive Order to drop two atomic bombs on defeated Japan.

Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe, Dwight David Eisenhower said, “Japan was already defeated and the dropping of the [atomic] bomb[s] was completely unnecessary.”

Prior to the atomic attack on Japan, the US had waged a fire-bombing war, not on the Japanese military, but on innocent Japanese men, women and children, beginning with the dropping of 700,000 incendiary bombs on Tokyo. Two nights later, a force of more than 500 B-29s, again, struck the heart of the Japanese Empire with 4,000 tons of incendiaries. Those Tokyo fire-bombs brought more horror than our minds can comprehend, but the resulting winds wrought even more terror. The heat from the flaming cauldrons below was so intense, that the B-29s flying above were often buffeted upwards by as much as 4,000 feet.

US reconnaissance photographs showed that 51.3 square miles of what was once Tokyo, teeming with 7, 000,000 human beings, had been reduced to ashes, sans the stench of burning human flesh. More

ECJ rules against Monsanto over inactive DNA in soymeal

Leave a comment

By Jess Halliday, 09-Jul-2010

“The European Court of Justice this week ruled that Monsanto cannot claim patent protection in Europe for inactive DNA sequences in imported GM soymeal, a judgement that lawyers believe could stimulate more imports of produce with inactive DNA.”

Monsanto holds a patent in the EU on a genetic sequence which makes the soybean plant resident to the herbicide glyphosate, used by farmers to kill off weeds without harming their soy crops. It does not hold a parallel patent for the technology, known as Roundup Ready, in Argentina however, which is a major soy grower.

In 2005 and 2006 soymeal imported from Argentina to The Netherlands was found to contain traces of Monsanto’s DNA, which indicated that the soymeal had been produced using the Roundup Ready variety.

Monsanto launched a lawsuit at the Rechtbank’s Gravenhage in The Hague, which subsequently referred the question to the European Court of Justice as to whether the DNA sequence’s presence constituted a patent infringement when marketed in the EU. More

America captured: The intended chipping and tagging of American citizens for continual surveillance

Leave a comment

Marti Oakley (c)Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

“But no doubt, somewhere there is an office of the Potty Czar, dedicated to tracking how much TP you use and how many times a day you use it.” ___________________

One way or another, the corporate federal government is going to chip and tag us.  The first real effort to begin the cataloguing of the people was in 1992 when every state began collecting the dna of every newborn.  Until recently, most people had no idea this was even going on.  Here in Minnesota, not only were most parents not aware of this collection, but none were told it was an opt-in system, not an opt-out.  In other words, they had to agree to have this sample taken, but most were never informed that any samples of this kind were taken at all.  The Minnesota Health department then claimed after 45 days, it owned the dna samples and could sell them for experimentation, or other purposes.  

All dna gathered for any purpose whatsoever is data-based and uploaded not only into CODIS (the criminal database) but also to Interpol (the international data base).  Even the dna of corpses is collected and logged into the system.  The Human Genome Project was launched specifically with the intent to eventually identify each and every one of us through our DNA, and link us immediately to any and all family members; even to extended family members we might not even be aware existed.  More

GOVERNMENTAL ATROCITIES HAVE EXPLODED SINCE WW II.

3 Comments

by: J. Speer-Williams (c)copyright 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

_________________________________________________

Down through the annuals of history, central governments have been notorious in their consistent and repeated crimes against humanity; but perhaps, at no time was their crimes more heinous than during the years of the Second World War.

    Since WWII, however, the severity and magnitude of governmental crimes have exploded exponentially. And, the explosions started in a monstrous way after the Japanese nation had lost its ability to wage war, and was trying to surrender on reasonable terms: It was then that US president Harry S. Truman issued his Executive Order to drop two atomic bombs on defeated Japan.

Prior to the atomic attack on Japan, the US had waged a fire-bombing war, not on the Japanese military, but on innocent Japanese men, women and children, beginning with the dropping of 700,000 incendiary bombs on Tokyo. Two nights later, a force of more than 500 B-29s, again, struck the heart of the Japanese Empire with 4,000 tons of incendiaries. Those Tokyo fire-bombs brought more horror than our minds can comprehend, but the resulting winds wrought even more terror. The heat from the flaming cauldrons below was so intense, that the B-29s flying above were often buffeted upwards by as much as 4,000 feet. More

Are corporations people or are people corporations?

6 Comments

             Live link: HORSESAVERS

by: Frank Mancuso (c)copyright 2010

                  

There seems to be some debate as to whether or not corporations are humans; in the eyes of the law they are. They have the same rights as people in a court of law and the Supreme Court has just given them the right of free speech and empowered them to overrule the votes of we mere citizens, by their financial might, to advertise for their choice. They can lobby and buy political influence and often escape violations of law because they are too big to fail and it goes on and on.

But are they really people? More

Failure to yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops

Leave a comment

The Union of Concerned Scientists pdf.

Driven by economic and political forces, food prices soared to record highs in 2007 and 2008, causing hardships around the world. Although a global food shortage was not a factor then or now—worldwide food production continues to exceed demand—those recent price spikes and localized scarcity, together with rising populations in many countries and individuals’ rising aspirations, have brought renewed attention to the need to increase food production in the coming decades. Many commentators and stakeholders have pointed to the alleged promise of genetic engineering (GE)—in which the crop DNA is changed using the gene-insertion techniques of molecular biology—for dramatically improving the yields of staple food crops. But a hard-nosed assessment of this expensive technology’s achievements to date gives little confidence that it will play a major role in helping the world feed itself in the foreseeable future.
This report is the first to evaluate in detail the overall, or aggregate, yield effect of GE after more than 20 years of research and 13 years of commercialization in the United States. Based on that record, we conclude that GE has done little to increase overall crop yields. Read More

While the churches fiddled …….humanity burned

Leave a comment

                                                             

Tell a Friend submit to reddit 

By: Marti Oakley  (C) copyright 2010  All Rights Reserved

“So, I’m asking this……why the silence?  Cat got your bank account?  ..I mean, tongue?”

In 2000 when the Bush & Co. Crime organization was unconstitutionally selected by the Supreme Court as the new president of the corporation we know as THE UNITED STATES, unlawfully taking possession of that office, the religious fanatics of all stripes fell to their knees and cried “hallelujah”.  It was not uncommon to hear those who subscribe to radical religious beliefs claim that “god” had selected Bush; it was “god” who wanted Bush in the White House; some even going so far as to proclaim that god was living in the White house via Bush.   I could only conclude that “god” must have been really pissed at us, or, he was actually holding a seat on the Supreme Court and no one told us, or, he was possibly staying over at the big house maybe sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom. 

Realizing the willing gullibility of those who believed the torturous twisting of scripture, the misinterpretations of and intentional misrepresenting of biblical quotes, the neo-conservative wing (formerly known as “the crazies in the basement” by Bush Sr.) kicked into high gear.  The crazies from the basement publicly embraced those driven insane by religious zealotry and the game was on although the zealots seemed not to be aware they were even playing.  More

Why am I categorically refusing the vaccine against influenza H1N1

Leave a comment

 

By: Jean-Jacques Crèvecoeurvaccty_dees
      Montréal (Québec – Canada)
       Ce 13 octobre 2009

This list of reasons are, only my own view.   They’re the conclusions I have arrived at after several months of thoroughly studying the scientific documents, official publications and declarations of medical authorities.

I’m giving you links to Internet sites so that you can check information yourself and give the whole issue further consideration.  As you will see, the reasons for my own refusal are many. I do not expect you to agree with my arguments since everyone has a different point of view. What I do invite you to do is to consider which, are the sentences, here that fit your own reality, and simply follow the voice of your conscience. In any case, only one reason should be enough to push you to refuse this vaccine. For you and for your close relations, it is your choice.

I refuse this vaccine because there isn’t any flu pandemic in 2009 yet More

National Geographic Genographic Project & IBM

12 Comments

In my earlier article, Applied DNA Sciences Collaborates with Government to Create DNA-Based Real ID, I mentioned the use of DNA for potentially nefarious purposes (from cataloging the DNA of everyone on earth, to collecting data that can be used to engineer racially-specific and even individually-specific bioweapons) and how it is being collected from large segments of the population through voluntary, yet deceptive means, such as DNA projects for genealogists, or 23andme.com’s collection of DNA for matching prospective spouses, etc.

I’d like to turn your attention, now, to yet another example of this sort of seemingly benign DNA gathering, disguised as a scientific anthropological project to track mankind’s origins and ancient migration patterns. This is the stated goal of the National Geographic Society’s Genographic Project.

On the surface, it seems innocuous enough, especially to people like myself, who have been involved directly in the use of DNA testing for genealogical research (as I mentioned in my previous article). Millions of my fellow genealogists, who are mostly hobbyists, like myself, interested in their ancestry and interested in trying new tools to further their research, have signed up for and participated in thousands of DNA surname projects. The goal is to use DNA testing to establish relationships with other genealogists who may hold key data that could help us to advance our research. However, as I mentioned previously, they may not be aware of the potentially nefarious uses being made of their DNA samples.

The Genographic Project may not be as innocuous as it appears to be, especially when you consider that IBM is involved as its chief source of funding. It was IBM that created the computer punch cards used to assemble a database of the inmates of Nazi Germany’s death camps during WWII. This was, in fact, how IBM got started. Given IBM’s ties to the Nazis and to eugenics, it is not surprising that they are funding a project that has, as one of its goals, assembling a database of DNA of indigenous people from all over the world. This particular aspect of the Genographic Project may very well be part of an effort to engineer racially-specific bioweapons. Investigative author Edwin Black has written two books, one on the role of IBM in the Nazi’s death camps, titled IBM and the Holocaust, and the other is War Against the Weak, which doucments the rise of eugenics and mentions IBM’s role in that, as well.

Reading through the frequently asked questions page of the Genographic Project website, one can get a fairly good idea (if one reads between the lines and sees beyond the hype) as to what this project is really all about. For example, under question number eleven, “Has the Genographic Project Received any Outside Review and Approval?,” it is stated that the project has been reviewed and approved by the Social and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Pennsylvania Office of Regulatory Affairs. This is one office of the IRB, which also has an office at the University of Chicago. Note that the Chicago office’s web address contains the words, “human subjects.” Indeed, as the Genographic Project FAQ page says, the IRB is directly involved in “research involving human participants.” That is what they do. However, as Dr. Tim O’Shea points out in his article, “The Doors of Perception,” the public relations industry commonly uses fake organizations to bolster the claims of advertisers and give them an air of scientific legitimacy. I believe the IRB is another case in point and is a front organization for the eugenics movement.

Note, also, that every one of the organizations cited by the Genographic Project as an approving reviewer of some sort are foreign based organizations within universities, some of which are just further branches of the IRB. Each of these is located in a country in which the indigenous population are DNA test subjects for the Genographic Project. In fact the IRB is entrenched in many universities around the world, including Georgetown University, which has been intimately linked with the Jesuits, the Freemasons and the Illuminati.

The Genographic Project’s cataloging of indigenous peoples’ DNA has, so far, encompassed East Asia, India, the Middle East, North America, North Eurasia, and Sub-Saharan Africa – the very focus of the depopulation agenda of the elite.

The DNA samples are being gathered voluntarily, via “informed consent,” according to the Genographic Project, however, one must ask exactly what the participants are being informed of. Like all these other seemingly innocuous DNA gathering organizations and companies, they hide their true agenda behind a mask of scholarly research and science.

One other comment in the FAQ page that makes the racially-specific bioweapon suspicion credible is, “The core scientific objectives of the Genographic Project will be advanced by engaging the participation of individuals and groups within key populations. From the standpoint of the Genographic Project, ‘key populations’ are stable populations that have lived within their respective geographic regions and maintained their present culture for many generations. This stability makes the genetic signatures carried by each member anthropologically informative and will help to provide reliable indicators of ancient migratory patterns.” It is more than convenient that this can be viewed as either the benign goal of an organization interested in only the scientific investigation of mankind’s roots, or it can equally be exactly what eugenicists would do in order to isolate racially-specific genetic traits and signatures that could be exploited to manufacture drugs, processed foods, chemicals and viruses that can be used to render these indigenous groups extinct. Given the aims of certain segments of the scientific community in the recent past, it is not at all unreasonable to suggest this is the true objective.

Sowing Seeds of Starvation: Monsanto Hype in Growing Food Crisis

1 Comment

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/06/06/Sowing-Seeds-of-Starvation-Monsanto-Hype-in-Growing-Food-Crisis.aspx

An ad that recently ran during the American Public Media show Marketplace, sponsored by Monsanto, the world’s largest corporate agribusiness chemical firm, touted how Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) seeds are going to save the world from environmental catastrophe and human hunger.

The Monsanto ads are, quite simply, false. The premise of the ad is that Monsanto’s GM seeds are going to save the world from environmental catastrophe and human hunger, but the reality of Monsanto’s seeds and the company’s ethics and commitment to fighting world hunger have little to do with either.

Eighty-five percent of all GM seeds are engineered for herbicide tolerance, most of these being Monsanto’s “Roundup Ready” cotton, corn, soy, and canola seeds. This allows plants to withstand significant amounts of pesticides being sprayed on it, in effect promoting pesticide use. As a result, there has been an increase in pesticide use in the United States since the introduction of GM seeds. Since the introduction of GM crops in the United States, more than 120 million pounds of additional pesticides were used.

At the same time, not a single GM crop has been commercially introduced that is intended to increase yield. Agronomists and plant scientists made far greater advances in yields through conventional breeding methods than they ever have with GM crops. In fact, there have been several studies which show that there are actually yield losses associated with Monsanto’s Roundup Ready soybeans. GM crops are not feeding the world, and they are not enabling us to produce more.

Monsanto wants you to believe their crops are feeding hungry children in Africa, and that they are allowing farmers to use fewer chemicals. But do their actions demonstrate that their concern lies solely in their profits?

  Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

 

Anyone who believes Monsanto’s proclamations of saving the world from environmental catastrophe and hunger is clearly not paying attention to some very blatant signs that this is not true.

It’s unfortunate that the U.S. has yet to follow the decision of several other countries that have already banned genetically modified crops. Germany, for example, recently became the sixth country in the European Union to take a stand against GM corn. Meanwhile, tens of millions of acres of GM corn are being planted in the U.S.

According to the French Professor Gilles-Eric Seralini, a molecular endocrinologist and a member of two French government commissions evaluating GM food, the corn variety in question, called MON 810, has shown statistically significant problems in animal studies.

They found the effects of the GM crops were similar to that of pesticides, causing inflammation disorders, and problems with livers and kidneys, two major organs involved with detoxification.

Another scientist, biology professor Bela Darvas of Hungary‘s Debrecen University, discovered that Monsanto’s Mon 810 is lethal to two Hungarian protected species.

So how does Monsanto respond to Darvas’ disturbing findings?

They simply refuse to give him any more Mon 810 corn to use in his tests. They’ve also refused his request for Mon 863, another GM variety. Is that really the enlightened action of an environmentally sensitive company that is looking out for not only your health, but the wellbeing of the planet?

Common GMO Myths

As The GM-Free Ireland Network points out, there are numerous GM biotechnology propaganda myths in circulation, and none of them are true. If you’ve been paying attention to the news about genetically modified plants, you’ve probably heard some of them already. (For the full list, please see this pdf.)

Myth #1: Genetic engineering is a continuation of traditional breeding methods

In fact, most GM crops are modified with the introduction of DNA from other species entirely. This never occurs in nature, or with traditional breeding methods.

Myth #2: Opponents of GM food are anti-science

Leading opponents of GM foods include the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Independent Science Panel, the U.S. Center for Food Safety, and numerous agronomic, environmental, and health scientists.

Myth #3: GM crops have higher yields

GM crop seeds currently on the market do not increase yields, and are not designed to. In fact, GM crops typically render lower yields.

For example, GM soya has decreased yields by up to 20 percent compared with non-GM soya. And up to 100 percent failures of Bt cotton have been recorded in India. This in turn has spurred a staggering number of suicides among India’s farmers. According to the National Crime Records Bureau of India, more than 182,900 Indian farmers took their own lives between 1997 and 2007, potentially due to GM crop failures. An estimated 46 Indian farmers commit suicide every day.

Additionally, recent studies by scientists from the USDA and the University of Georgia found that growing GM cotton in the U.S. can result in a drop in income by up to 40 percent.

Myth #4: Americans have been eating GM foods for 15 years without any health problems

This one is perhaps most deceptive as GM foods are not labeled in the U.S., which makes traceability and accountability impossible. There may or may not be obvious health problems, but it is carefully designed so that no one can find out for sure.

However, according to Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, what we do know is that between 1994 and 2001 – at the same time as GMO’s flooded the market – food related illnesses DOUBLED. 

His findings show that GMO foods can be: 

  • Allergenic
  • Toxic
  • Carcinogenic
  • Anti-nutritional

Although the major food giants are carrying on with their claim that GM foods are no different from conventionally grown varieties, the research says otherwise.

For example, GM peas were found to cause lung damage in mice; GM potatoes have been linked to cancer in rats; and bacteria in the human gut has been shown to take up DNA from genetically modified food under certain circumstances.

When viewed as a whole, GM foods are a disaster for the environment, an unviable solution to world hunger, and undoubtedly worse for your health.

GM Crops Fail to Live Up to Advertised Promises Again and Again

The fact remains that GM crops have failed to deliver on virtually every single promise and expectation. After 30 years of GMO experimentation, we have the data to show:No reduction in pesticides use; on the contrary, USDA data shows that GM crops has increased pesticide use by 50 million pounds from 1996 to 2003 in the U.S., and the use of glyphosate went up more than 15-fold between 1994 and 2005, along with increases in other herbicides to cope with rising glyphosate resistant superweeds.

GM crops do harm wildlife
, as revealed by UK and U.S. studies.

Bt resistant pests and Roundup tolerant superweeds render the two major GM crop traits useless. The evolution of Bt resistant bollworms worldwide have now been confirmed and documented.

Unpredictable transgene contamination is completely unavoidable, as science has recently revealed that the genome (whether plant, animal or human) is NOT constant and static, which is the scientific base for genetic engineering of plants and animals.

Instead, geneticists have discovered that the genome is remarkably dynamic and changeable, and constantly ‘conversing’ and adapting to the environment. This interaction determines which genes are turned on, when, where, by what and how much, and for how long. They’ve also found that the genetic material itself has the ability to be changed according to experience, passing it on to subsequent generations.

How to Avoid GM Foods

Avoiding GM products in your diet means avoiding an ever-growing number of ingredients, or choosing organic versions of them. This is not an easy task, especially if you eat processed food. However, the four most prevalent GM ingredients to look out for are:

  • Soy
  • Corn
  • Cottonseed
  • Canola 

You’ll also want to avoid the offspring of these products, which includes items like maltodextrin, soy lecithin, and high fructose corn syrup.

You CAN Demand Better Food

It’s easy to sit back and think you can’t do a thing to change the current state of affairs, but the fact is, you CAN make a difference. You can demand something better — food that is still food, grown the way nature intended.

First and foremost, you can vote with your pocketbook by avoiding everything that contains GM ingredients, and ask your local supermarket to stock their shelves with more natural organic foods. Some supermarkets will even allow you to special order food items.
And don’t forget about your elected officials. Let them know how you feel about it, and what kind of policies you’re willing to support.

  • People in certain professions can play a significant role to advance this cause as well:
  • Chefs, restaurants and food companies can switch to non-GM sources
  • Retailers can remove or label GM products or offer in-store Non-GMO Shopping Guides
  • Religious leaders can help to educate their congregation
  • Health practitioners can provide patient education materials
  • Those in the education world can help make school cafeterias GM-free
  • Reporters can expose the health risks
  •  

To get an idea of just how widespread GM ingredients are, I recommend taking a look at The GMO Food Guide. It lists 20 different food categories that include everything from baby food to chocolate.

And the incredible series Seeds of Doubt, written by staffers at the Sacramento Bee, can offer further guidance to fully understand the many problems associated with GM foods.

Last but not least, I urge everyone to watch the video The Future of Food, and forward the link to this video to your friends, family and acquaintances. This in-depth investigation into the disturbing truth behind genetically modified foods is one of the best documentaries made to date. It will help you understand how and why the genetic engineering we allow to be unleashed today is a very real threat to ALL future generations.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/06/06/Sowing-Seeds-of-Starvation-Monsanto-Hype-in-Growing-Food-Crisis.aspx

 

GM Food Nightmare Unfolding in the Regulatory Sham

Leave a comment

skulls_dees

 

http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/177.html

ISIS – Regulator agencies like the European Food Safety Authority and the UK Food Standards Agency have been ignoring the precautionary principle, manipulating and corrupting science, sidestepping the law, and helping to promote GMOs in the face of massive public opposition and damning evidence piling up against the safety of GM food and feed

These charges are made in a devastating report [1] ( GM Food Nightmare Unfolding and the Regulatory Sham ) released today by the Institute of Science in Society*. The report has been submitted to the European Food Standards Agency, the World Health Organisation/ Food and Agriculture Organization Expert Consultation on GM Food Animals, and the UK Food Standards Agency, and it has been accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

The 19-page report contains more than 130 references. It draws together evidence from all over the world indicating that GM food and feed may be inherently hazardous to health, regardless of the plant species or the genetic modification involved. For example,

  • Female rats fed Roundup Ready soybeans gave birth to many severely stunted pups, with over half of the litter dead by three weeks, and the surviving pups were sterile; Roundup Ready soya has been approved worldwide for food and feed since 1996
  • Farmers and workers exposed to Bt cotton and Bt maize have suffered serious allergy-like symptoms
  • Livestock feeding on Bt crops and crop residues became ill and died in large numbers

“The evidence has stacked up to such an extent that our regulators should be answering a charge of criminal negligence at the very least in failing to ban GM crop and continuing with their campaign of denial and disinformation, and worse, helping to promote even more dangerous GM produce from the industry,” said Dr. Mae-Wan Ho. Dr Ho is the director of ISIS and lead author of the report co-authored with Joe Cummins , emeritus Professor of Biology at the University of Western Ontario, Canada, and Peter Saunders, emeritus Professor of Mathematics at King’s College, London University.

That Bt toxins can cause serious immune reactions was known long before they were widely incorporated into maize and cotton crops. Similarly, evidence that pieces of genetically modified (GM) DNA can be taken up and incorporated into the genomes of other cells – a process called horizontal gene transfer – has been steadily accumulating since the mid 1990s, when the ISIS scientists first sounded their warning to the regulators.

“GM DNAs often contain antibiotic resistance marker genes and other genes from bacteria and viruses that cause diseases. In addition, they have strong control signals – ‘promoters’ – that force the cell to express a foreign gene at high levels,” Dr. Mae-Wan Ho explains. “As a result, horizontal gene transfer not only spreads antibiotic resistance genes to harmful bacteria, it can create new bacteria and viruses that can cause epidemics. And if the strong promoter jumps into the wrong place in the genome of animal cells, it can boost the expression of oncogenes and cause the cells to multiply out of control, or cancer by another name.”

Europe and the UK are required by law to abide by the precautionary principle. Both have signed up to the Cartegena Protocol on Biosafety regulating GMOs, and a string of other international treaties for protecting health and the environment based on the precautionary principle. But systematic manipulation of scientific evidence and abuse of science by the regulatory authorities has meant that the precautionary principle is never invoked.

“GM food/feed looks like joining asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), BSE, tobacco and many others as yet another example of the government relying on bad scientific advice and ignoring the precautionary principle, with devastating consequences,” said Prof. Peter Saunders.

In three recent cases, American courts have ruled that the US Department of Agriculture failed to carry out proper environmental impact assessment before giving approval for releases of GM crops to the environment, and that the releases are therefore illegal.

“Regulation of genetically modified food crops in North America is a complete sham. It’s time for a shake up. The regulatory agencies must represent the law and the people not just corporate interests,” said Prof. Joe Cummins

For further information:

*The Institute of Science in Society is a UK London-based not-for-profit organization dedicated to providing critical public information on cutting edge science, and to promoting social accountability and ecological sustainability in science.

 http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/177.html

Link Found Between GMOs & Deadly Tuberculosis

1 Comment

http://farmwars.info/?p=659

By Ingrid Blank

poisonInstead of blaming multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis on patients and their alleged non-adherence to the prescribed drug regime, it would be prudent to investigate and eradicate the underlying cause for multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis and other drug and antibiotic resistant infectious diseases first—namely commercial gene technology.

The disaster unfolding on a global scale is exactly the reason why the first genetic engineers called for a moratorium in the Asilomar Declaration of 1975. For decades, reputable and ethical scientists such as Dr. Mae Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins have warned—substantiated by scientific evidence— that horizontal gene transfer, i.e. the transfer of genes by vectors (viruses and other infectious agents) designed to cross species barriers and thus enhancing the potential for creating new viral and bacterial pathogens, will result in the creation of superbugs and multi-drug resistant diseases.

According to these eminent genetic researchers, strains of bacteria “crippled” in the laboratory can survive in the environment and exchange genes with other organisms. DNA from dead and living cells persists in the environment and transfers to other organisms. 

Naked viral DNA (virus without its protein coat) is even more infectious and may well be taken up by mammalian cells including our own! In addition, viral DNA has been shown to resist digestion in the gut of mice, and enters the bloodstream to infect white blood cells, spleen and liver cells.

One such virus most commonly used as a promoter in genetic engineering is the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) which, due to its recombination hotspot, is prone to break and join with other DNA to integrate into the cell’s genome, which could activate host genes and lead to cancer. In addition, CaMV is closely related to the hepatitis B and HIV virus and due to its ability to propagate in plant and insect hosts after recombination may also recombine with related hepatitis B and HIV to create a most powerful disease in a large number of people consuming large numbers of virus genes incorporated into crop plants.

In the South African setting, the number of people at risk could not get any larger, since our government unilaterally decided without the people’s knowledge and above all prior consent, to grow our staple food (white maize) in genetically modified form without adhering to the precautionary principle, thus violating our constitutional rights to healthy food.

For the reasons described above, it is therefore imperative to demand immediate implementation of mandatory labeling of genetically modified food products in compliance with our constitutional rights of informed choice and consent, participation in decision-making processes and above all the individual’s right to bodily integrity, the latter being the most significant provision of the Nuremberg Code, which sets forth legal requirements for human experimentation, i.e. “voluntary consent of subject is absolutely essential.”

Likewise, the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares bodily integrity central to both human rights and human dignity and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights unmistakably declares that “no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”

By deliberately ignoring the precautionary principle and refusing to implement mandatory labeling of GM products, this government allows its citizens to be used as guinea pigs, sacrificing the nation’s health for corporate greed. There is no such thing as “substantial equivalence.”

This phrase was coined by scientifically illiterate lawyers of the biotech industry and in 1992 written into law by G.H.W. Bush, who proclaimed GM plants to be “substantially equivalent” to their traditional counterparts and therefore did not need any special health safety study or testing. Ethical scientists and researchers consider this the biggest farce and fraud ever committed in the science field.

Contrary to what the corporate yarn spinners of biotech companies want the public to believe, not one single human safety study has ever been conducted. One does not need a Ph.D. in genetics to see the correlation between GMOs and the sharp rise in HIV infections and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and other diseases. The decision-makers who keep violating our human right to bodily integrity by unleashing these toxins into our environment and food chain without our knowledge and consent must be held accountable.

Ingrid Blank is a South African of German descent who specializes in technical translations of medical treatises. This item originally appeared in Carotec’s TrueHealth newsletter. Carotec also sells extremely high quality vitamin supplements and natural health products. To find out more call Carotec at 1-800-522-4279. Write Carotec, Inc., P.O. Box 9919, Naples, FL 34101.
 

  

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
 

 

MN Government planning to STEAL your medical data…to RATION your care!

Leave a comment

Your action needed immediately!

DEADLINE – Friday, February 6, 2009.


MN Government planning to STEAL your medical data…to RATION your care!The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) held a public meeting yesterday (1/29) to discuss their timetable for government warehousing and analysis of the medical records data of all Minnesotans for the purpose of centralizing medical decision-making…and limiting your access to care. (see quotes below)

List of your Medical/Insurance/Pharmacy Data that will be sent to Government

They plan to ramrod this plan through…and avoid all public input.

The 2008 health care reform bill negotiated by Governor Pawlenty and House and Senate leadership authorized “expedited rulemaking” therefore stripping citizens of their right to ask for a public hearing before a judge on this plan to seize the private patient data of every citizen.

Health Department Fails to Inform Citizens
Yesterday they had a public meeting, not a public hearing. The Department chose not to even advertise it to the general public. CCHC has found no press release. This is the ONLY public meeting they plan to have for the public to learn about their plans and provide input. Four members of the public, including CCHC, were in the room yesterday along with about 70 industry and government folks. The four individuals in the room asked many pointed questions about cost and privacy and research that clearly frustrated health department officials…and exposed their lack of knowledge on the cost of this intrusive operation. (see below)

Please Act Immediately!
The health department has set a February 6 deadline for hearing from you! CCHC has provided a list of the data that will be sent to the government. Please do the following:

image

  • TELL the MN Department of Health what you think of their plan to seize your medical records data and control your doctor’s decisions! Consider sending a carbon copy to the Star Tribune’s lead health science reporter (dhage@startribune.com) and to CCHC(info@cchconline.org)  Tell others to write a letter too. It can be 5 words long or 500.
  • TO SEND YOUR COMMENTS:

    Email:
    will.wilson@state.mn.us

    Mail:
    Minnesota Department of Health
    Division of Health Policy
    65 East Seventh Place, Suite 220
    St. Paul, MN 55164-0882
    Attn: Will Wilson

    Include your name, address, and phone number!

    TOPIC:  MDH Collection and Use of Patient “Encounter Data” (M.S. 62U.04)



    ALSO:


    Real Purpose of Data Collection
    Your medical records are being seized to monitor and control your doctors (see quotes); essentially, to build “scientific”data-based rationale for centralized decision-making…and health care rationing.

    Treatment Control Threatened – QUOTES 1/29/09 meeting
    The stated goals according to comments by today’s presenters included the following:

    • “[We’re] looking at care patterns of a provider”
    • “We want to know about the entire population the provider is serving”
    • “We want to get as complete a picture as possible of a provider’s population”
    • “[Use for] development and reporting of provider peer groups” based on “cost, quality, value, and efficiency”
    • “create a single standard [of “compliance reporting”] that the community agrees on.”
    • “to look at the quality of care provided…resources used to achieve quality…and price of resources used”
    • “Payers are required under statute to use that information” to steer patients toward higher quality, lower cost, more efficient providers [ie. providers that comply with MDH’s idea of “evidence-based medicine.”]
    • “We can look and see if that individual gets the appropriate treatment” [according to the ‘series of protocols’ they have for certain diseases]
    • “We need to count. We need to classify.”
    • “Gather all medical and pharmaceutical data and track members [patients] across plans”
    • Need pharmacy data to monitor “Treatment patterns…Resource consumption…Payment information”

    Command and Control
    Your medical records and insurance data will be used to create what they call, “provider peer groups.” CCHC prefers to call them “compliance report cards” on every doctor, clinic, and hospital. In 2002, MDH tried to get access to everyone’s private medical records through a proposed rule, but the public was outraged, hearings were held, it made front page news, and the proposed rule was withdrawn in 2003. In 2004, MDH tried to get the data through “best practices” legislation, but CCHC petitions forced the legislature to sunset the language in 2006. In 2008, in the final days of session the health care reform law gave them authority to get the data. By law, all insurers are now required to send your private data to MDH, which is using the Maine Health Information Center (MHIC) as their data warehouse contractor.

    Patient Privacy Gone
    Every time you see the doctor, the data will be sent to the Maine data warehouse. Every medication you take will be reported to Maine. Every diagnosis, every treatment will be cataloged. Every medical charge, every bill you pay will be reported. Your insurance company will have to regularly send a list of all their enrollees to Maine. The data will be released to MHIC under the loosest federal definition of “de-identified.” The name of every doctor and the encrypted name of every patient will be sent with every data submission. This “de-identification” process will not likely prevent re-identification of you if MDH wishes to do so.

    Clueless on Cost
    When asked about cost during the Q&A session, MDH officials did not know the following:

    • The cost of the 27 month contract with MHIC [they said they’d send it to CCHC]
    • The cost of the health department’s administration of the program [they said they’d send it]
    • Whether the data collection will save the state any money in health care spending
    • How much reporting will cost the entities required to report. They said they didn’t even try.

PROPOSED: Socialized Medicine, Gov’t Surveillance & DNA Grab! Minnesota

Leave a comment


Governor Pawlenty Supports Illegal Actions of MN Health Commissioner

CCHC held a press conference on December 10, 2008 challenging Governor Pawlenty to require health commissioner, Dr. Sanne Magnan, M.D., to follow the state’s genetic privacy law. WCCO-TV, KSTP-TV, and FOX-9 News gave the press conference great coverage, yet the Governor did not respond.

Instead, on January 9th, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health proposed to try again to eliminate parent consent requirements in the genetic privacy law by giving the Department access to baby DNA for at least two years. CCHC’s president, Twila Brase, was quoted in the St. Paul Pioneer Press saying, “This is the genetic profile of every child and the bloodline of every family…What they’re trying to say is, ‘For two years, it’s ours.'”

Last week, Twila Brase, president of CCHC, met TWICE with staff at the Governor’s Office. She met with the governor’s Director of Legislative and Cabinet Affairs, and his senior health care policy advisor. She made it clear that the Governor would have to publicly state that he is requiring the MN Department of Health to follow the law or we would feel free to assert three things as of January 21, 2009 (see below). No such proclamation has been made.

Thus, we regret to say, Governor Tim Pawlenty supports the following:

  • Violation of state law by the Minnesota Department of Health.
  • Government ownership and warehousing of newborn baby DNA.
  • Forcing newborn citizens and their families to become involuntary subjects of government genetic research.

To Contact Governor Pawlenty: 651-296-3391; 800-657-3717; tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us (voice mail is best)


Time to Twitter – Get CCHC Tweets!

CCHC has set up two sites on Twitter.

One is focused on genetic privacy and DNA ownership rights; the other is focused on the advance of socialized medicine. Within a hour of creating the NoSocializedMed twitter site, it had a follower…before CCHC even announced the site. Expect tweets straight from the halls of the legislature.

For those who do not know, “tweets” can only be 140 characters long. In other words, VERY SHORT!

U.S. House Republicans used Twitter to put pressure on Democrats during their energy sit-in during the 2008 August recess.

To see CCHC tweets – not more than two a day from each site – join Twitter and sign up to FOLLOW CCHC’s tweets. You can either come daily to the Twitter site to view the tweets…or be directly alerted whenever a new tweet is issued.

CCHC Twitter Sites:

http://twitter.com/itsmydna
http://twitter.com/noSocializedMed


Support CCHC’s Freedom-Focused Efforts Today

Your financial contributions will help CCHC’s efforts! Please donate $10 or $25 or $100 online today

Donations are tax-deductible!

CCHC has been approved as a 501(c)3 non-profit educational organization by the IRS.

Minnesota Department of Health Continues to Store Baby DNA without Required

Leave a comment

MEDIA RELEASE
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
For Immediate Release



Minnesota Department of Health Continues to Store Baby DNA without Required

 

Parent Consent; Violates Genetic Privacy Law…and Governor’s Veto

 

 

CCHC calls on Governor Pawlenty to require compliance with state law

St. Paul/Minneapolis – In a press conference held today, concerned parents and the Citizens’ Council on Health Care (CCHC) called on Governor Tim Pawlenty to require his Commissioner of Health to cease and desist the warehousing of newborn blood and baby DNA without informed, written parent consent.

“Despite Governor Pawlenty’s veto of the health department’s DNA warehousing bill last legislative session…we have confirmed that the Minnesota Department of Health is continuing to warehouse baby DNA without parent consent. This is a direct violation of the genetic privacy and DNA property rights of parents and children,” said Twila Brase, president of CCHC.

DeEtta Moos, mother of four children, said, “Last session, there was an attempt to undercut Judge Neilson’s ruling, but thanks to Governor Pawlenty’s veto, the Minnesota Genetic Privacy Law still demands the requirement of parental consent for storage of blood and any purposes beyond the initial testing.”

Ryan Sibinski, expectant father of twins, expressed his disappointment saying, “My wife and I are acutely aware that storage of newborn DNA is still being done illegally by the MN Department of Health.  We thought the Governor’s veto was supposed to solve this, but we have now discovered that the storage continues.”

Mr. Sibinski continued, “In two months or less, our babies will be born. I request here today that the Department of Health make sure that I am clearly asked to consent to the storage, use, and sharing of my children’s blood and DNA.   This is my legal right under the law.”

Attorney Nathan Hansen, who has been attempting to obtain public documents regarding the transfer and use of newborn DNA for research studies, said, “No excuse has been given by the Department for this information not to be handed over.”

Notable History:

  • August 1, 2006 – Minnesota Genetic Privacy Law (M.S. 13.386) becomes effective. Informed written consent required for collection, storage, use and dissemination of genetic information by government and others.
  • January 23, 2007 – At request of concerned citizens, a public hearing was held on the health department’s proposed revision to the newborn screening rule.
  • March 23, 2007 – Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Barbara Neilsen rules that the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is violating the 2006 state genetic privacy law’s informed written consent requirements for storage, use and dissemination.
  • July 3, 2007 – Chief Administrative Law Judge Raymond R. Krause denies Health Commissioner Dianne Mandernach’s appeal of the Neilsen ruling.
  • August 29, 2007 – Commissioner Mandernach withdraws the proposed revision to the newborn screening rule.
  • February 25, 2008 – Legislation introduced in the Minnesota legislature to exempt the newborn screening program (collection, storage, use, and dissemination) from the genetic privacy law’s requirements for informed, written consent.
  • May 19, 2008 – Governor vetoes S.F. 3138, prohibiting an exemption to the genetic privacy law’s consent requirements. He mentions ALJ ruling in his veto letter.
  • November 18, 2008 – David Orren, MDH Chief Legal Counsel, confirms to CCHC that MDH continues to store newborn blood without consent.

Ms. Brase called on Governor Pawlenty to act, saying, “We call on Governor Pawlenty to take immediate steps to assure the public that he supports the rule of law, and holds his administration accountable to follow the law. Let me suggest that he issue a statement today guaranteeing the health department’s compliance with the written informed consent requirements of the genetic privacy law. He could decree that no newborn blood be warehoused, used for research, or shared with others without informed written parent consent. He could order the health department to release public documents in compliance with the Government Data Practices Act. And he could also promise to dismantle the state’s DNA warehouse, protecting the genetic privacy rights of the more than 780,000 children whose DNA has been claimed by state government and warehoused without consent.”

-CCHC-

Links to the Governor’s veto letter, the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, the Minnesota Department of Health and CCHC documents can be found at http://www.itsmydna.org

Citizens’ Council on Health Care supports freedom for patients and doctors, medical
innovation, and the right to a confidential patient-doctor relationship.

PLEASE ACT – MN government wants to own your DNA!

Leave a comment

ACT NOW !                                            

TAKE OUR DNA SURVEY

UNDER ATTACK:  Your Parent, Patient, Privacy & DNA Property Rights!

While the MN Genetic Privacy law today requires informed written consent before government or others can collect, store, use or share YOUR genetic information….state government bureaucrats and special interests in a state genetic committee want to eliminate the consent requirement next year!


The Threat                

NEWBORN DNA: The MN Genetic Information Working Group has met for a year. During these meetings, the issue of newborn genetic testing…and storage and use of newborn DNA-filled blood spots…has become very contentious. (see quotes below)

BIG GOVERNMENT: Working group members from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) want government control and ownership of citizen DNA for “public health” purposes. Their recommendation seeks to undo the informed written consent requirements of the 2006 genetic privacy law (MN Statutes 13.386).

• INVOLUNTARY RESEARCH: The lawyer representing Mayo Clinic in the working group wants all blood, tissue and body parts taken in the course of your medical care to be available without your consent for medical and genetic research by your clinic, hospital and laboratory.

OPPOSED TO GOVERNOR’S VETO: Mayo’s lawyer also stated during one of the meetings that Governor Pawlenty’s decision to veto the 2008 DNA warehouse bill should not have happened (Notice: Mayo has a contract with MDH to do genetic testing of all babies).


Your help is needed now!

The 2009 legislature will soon be asked to decide whether to protect or eliminate your consent rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights.

A report from the MN Genetic Information Working Group will go to the 2009 legislature in December.

Twila Brase, CCHC’s president and an appointed member of the working group, has pressed for retaining informed written parent and patient consent requirements. She has said that government and private institutions must be required to obtain informed written consent for almost all collection, storage, use and dissemination of biological specimens (blood, tissue, fluids, organs, hair, etc). She has repeatedly told the working group:

  • Individuals need the right to protect themselves from having their genetic data used against them and their families.
  • No person should be forced to be an involuntary subject of medical and genetic research.
  • Genetic experts are already warning that there can be no guarantee of anonymity in research because of the proliferation of databases.
  • Even if DNA and genetic testing data could be anonymized, individuals should not be forced to participate in research they may find objectionable.

Today, the Mayo attorney told members of the working group that if they accept CCHC’s recommendations regarding research, Minnesota would become an “outlier.” Twila Brase disagreed, saying Minnesota would instead become a leader.

Help us protect your parent, patient, privacy and DNA property rights!

If you haven’t already done so…please take CCHC’s very brief DNA OWNERSHIP SURVEY today!

Please ask everyone you know to take the survey as well!

 

STATEMENTS HEARD AT TODAY’S MEETING OF THE   MN GENETIC INFORMATION WORKING GROUP:

“People have to be very careful in weighing the risk of discarding  specimens…If you limit the ability to test these spots or keep these spots, you’ll limit the ability to test for lethal conditions in the future.”

(Ruth Lynfield, MDH Epidemiologist, arguing for continued government retention of newborn blood taken from all babies at birth)

“Yes, that’s rightThat’s how it’s historically been done.”

(Lynfield, MDH, in response to a member’s question about whether newborn blood spots now retained by the state health department have already been used for research to develop additional newborn screening tests)

“Yes, perfectly healthy children’s blood spots were used.” (David Orren, MDH attorney, in response to a question about the Mayo Clinic’s research project on Wilson’s Disease using government-retained newborn blood spots – without parent consent or knowledge)

“Having a population-based [blood spot] repository is incredibly important.”

(Lynfield, MDH)

“Public health is such a broad purpose.”

(Orren, MDH, arguing against parent and patient written informed consent requirements for secondary uses of DNA, biological specimens, and genetic information retained by government)

CCHC ACTION ALERT info@cchconline.org

DNA collection….Why do they want it?

2 Comments

I wrote recently concerning the collection of newborn DNA that has been going on virtually under the radar for the last ten years.  The article produced a major response from parents from all over the country who had no idea that they had signed anything agreeing to the testing.  The research for that article produced some other information that should be of interest.  Marti

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The Military Lawyer

Headquarters: Department of the Army

Excerpted page 1:

 

As of December 2002, the Repository, now known as the “Armed Forces Repository of Specimen Samples for the Identification of Remains,”6 contained the DNA of approximately 3.2 million service members.7   According to a recent DOD directive, the “provision of specimen samples by military members shall be mandatory.”8 The direction to a soldier, sailor, airman, or marine to contribute a DNA sample is a lawful order which, if disobeyed, subjects the service member to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).9 If convicted at court-martial for the offense of violating a lawful general order, the service member carries the lifelong stigma of a federal felony conviction, and faces a maximum punishment of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.1

http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/07-08-2003.pdf

 

I can understand the concept that this database could be used for battlefield identification, but knowing our history of leaving our dead and prisoners of war behind to facilitate the appeasement of other interests I do wonder why the Pentagon is keeping the DNA stored in a database for 75 years.  As the excerpt above shows, the DNA samples are not voluntary and there is no right to have the samples destroyed when military service ends.    

 

This database of 3.2 million military members is routinely accessed and shared with law enforcement among other entities.  This is the CODIS database that is the result of linking unrelated databases.  Military DNA data is merged with criminal data, medical data, genealogical data, newborn DNA data, insurance data, and multiple other applications crossing state and international lines.  And yes, Virginia, this information is shared with foreign governments.

 

The DNA of individuals arrested is now collected routinely, even on misdemeanor cases and merged with collected databases from the military and then merged with international databases.

 

Ownership of the military DNA repository contents resides with the government.  This means they can use it for whatever purpose they deem appropriate.  The combination of surveillance, biometrics, and video camera’s along with facial recognition are now combined with DNA databases to form an identifiable file on almost anyone and everyone. The representative of the repository sites the new found ability to implement routine mass surveillance of large segments of the population without the need for warrants or formal investigations.   

 

 

It would seem that since so many of us are repelled by the idea of being forced to comply with invasive RFID chips, or other biometric identifiers, the government has found some really innovative ways to ID and spy on us at will, and at the same time to collect body tissues and samples that identify not only who we are, but whom we came from.  Entire families can now be identified going forward and backward for generations. Why would our government, or any government for that matter find this necessary?

 

As it turns out, the same government that has denounced stem cell research and refuses to fund it, is at the same time allowing and funding fetal tissue research through the Department of Defense.   It is the same government that is conducting bio-weapons development with an eye on targeting specific DNA traits that include ethnicity.  It is the same government that has established bio labs across the country including in many of our universities, engaging in the development of ever more lethal strains of weaponized diseases including pandemic producing viruses.    

 

The newborn database is only part of a larger scheme to assemble a multi-national DNA database that will encompass every individual, not only in our country, but in every country in the world. 

 

One has to wonder what the end objective is.  DNA is so specific to the individual, that this information should not be shared or contributed unless specifically looking for disease markers, or in other specific instances.  The idea that it is being actively collected, with no real explanation being given for the true purpose, is at best, unsettling. 

 

If anyone out there has any conclusive evidence that would indicate that there is a legitimate objective in this collection of DNA, other than identifying dead military personnel, I would like to see it.  As it is, I can’t find anything other than what relates to government sponsored surveillance and spying.

 

Anyone??

 

© 2008 Marti Oakley

 

Frankenstein Science, Government and You….Revisited

1 Comment

I orignally wrote and posted this article in May of 2008.  At the time, people from across the country wrote to say that I was crazy and didn’t know what I was talking about.  Many people wrote (LOL!) at the end of their correspondence.

Guess who’s laughing now?  Marti

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

While I would like to believe that only now, in this particular time period, has any government shown such disdain for its own common population, I know it isn’t true.  Historically, every government has come to the conclusion that only it should be preserved and that everyone outside of the government entity is expendible; eventually seen as unnecessary.  That time has come for Americans. 

With the exception of the obscenely wealthy, the corporately connected or those willing to sell their soul for a chance to avoid extermination, we have all been slated for mass erasure or a lifetime of poverty induced slavery. More

What Will It Take?

Leave a comment

As American’s, I think we have become so lazy, so willing to be led, we have lost our way.  We are saddled with a government that on every level has lied to us and continues to lie to us….. a government that on every level works against us and in favor of big money and corporations and most of us do nothing.  Most of us don’t even object.  Many of us will try to align ourselves with those who have shown they despise us.

Too many of us will believe what ever the government says rather than risk being called a “conspiracy theorist”.  God forbid you should doubt or question anything!  You might not be “patriotic”.  And what the hell does that mean these days?  It means nothing.  We have forfeited our country, our sovereignty, our way of life and quality of life to individuals who view us as “human capital”…..something to bought and sold, traded and bartered.  In the eyes of our own government we are dispensable and quite frankly a nuisance. 

And what does happen if you do object?  What if you point out that what we are being told, doesn’t add up?  What if, for instance, you site the mountains of evidence from experts all over the world that 9/11 could not possibly have happened the way the government says it did?  Well then, you’re a “conspiracy theorist”.  Not only that…you hate America.  You aren’t a patriot and you don’t love God and if a natural disaster hits then it’s all your fault! 

What happens if you join millions of other people who are sounding the alarm that something has gone terribly wrong in our country?  What if, you are one of those people who are jumping up and down and protesting the stripping away of our rights, the loss of privacy under the total surveillance state, the coming police state and martial law?  Well then……you just want the terrorists to win!  If we have another 9/11 type attack it will be all your fault because you didn’t love America, you weren’t the right kind of patriot, and you are a conspiracy theorist.  And….. you don’t love God. 

What if you are one of those people who realizes that illegal immigration that is unchecked contradicts the story that,   a) We are in a war against terrorists   b) we must submit to REAL ID or other domestic internal passports in order to be safe, or,   c) That there really is or was a terrorist threat. 

Does it occur to anyone that if terrorists were trying to gain entry into our country to harm us, our southern border would have been sealed off immediately after 9/11?  That NO ONE would be able to jump a fence, dig a tunnel, hide in a trunk, walk across, swim across or otherwise enter this country without the necessary clearance to do so?  If the attacks on 9/11 were really those of foreign terrorists and the government truly thought or believed that another attack was possible by these same “terrorists”……wouldn’t the first reaction have been to seal off our borders immediately?  Yet here we are all these years later with a growing illegal population that is comprised not only of indigenous populations from south of the border, but a fair number of Chinese (14,000 now that China will not take back) and more than 4,000 Afghani’s, and countless other illegal entrants into our country……all while we are told we need to give up our rights and liberties, not to mention our jobs and way of life…….or we don’t love America; we aren’t the right kind of patriot.  We are “conspiracy theorists” and we don’t love God!!!

How about the efforts on state and national levels to establish a DNA database?  Does that sit well with you?  Look at just the last seven and a half years of actions by this administration and our congress and tell me if you see anything that would indicate to you that this government is attempting anything other than complete devastation of the common citizen, the complete ruination of our country.  Can you really tell me that a national DNA database wouldn’t be used adversely?  That there isn’t some other agenda most likely at the bottom of this effort, to enable the government not only to track us, but to develope ethnically devastating bioweapons based on our DNA?  (hint: They’re already doing it!)  Well then……you too must be a conspiracy theorist, and un-patriotic, and you must hate America and God to boot! 

I suppose I could site other issues, but I believe I have made my point.  I would much prefer to be called a conspiracy theorist, than a fool.  If anyone can produce anything other than the official version of 9/11 that proves that it happened the way we were told it did……so be it.  So far, not even the government has done that.

If being patriotic means that I now must support the loss of civil rights and liberties or face possible incarceration as a “domestic terrorist” for speaking out against the trashing of our Constitution, the subversion of our laws, and the policies of this government that have cost so many their lives while war profiteers in our government enrich them selves…….then I guess I am not the “new” brand of patriot.  I prefer the old brand……love of country first and foremost and the freedom to say what I believe to be true and the willingness to stand up and defend it……against all enemies foreign and domestic.

I want to know when it became unpatriotic to exercise my duty to dissent.  When did voicing an objection to government policies that have harmed so many become an unpatriotic act?  How does that equate to hating America?  It seems to me that those who hate America are those who have gone along with this assault on our nation that came not from terrorists from “over there”……but rather from those who wrap them selves in our flag while plotting our demise. 

I also believe that those who rage that we must hate America if we don’t comply with the current policies are those who are cowards; those who would willingly forfeit all for a false sense of security.  This is the new brand of patriot and one that I find disgusting.

As for God……I think he has left the building along with Elvis.  How anyone could believe that God would approve or condone the horrendous actions of this government, the deaths of more than a million Iraqi’s, the development of biological weapons to kill off indigenous populations or to target ethnic groups for eradication……..that any God would bestow his blessings on a country that has by its silence condoned so much bloodshed and devastation, that commits sickening acts of torture and has ruthlessly killed and maimed so many and sits by idly while millions go hungry, is unbelievable.    Do I love God?  The better question would be……does He still love us?  Have we given Him any reason to? 

With the coming police state and the declaring of martial law religion will be tolerated only so long as the churches encourage their congregations to comply peacefully.  Once that is done, religion will cease to exist as we know it. 

In the end, I may end up in jail or I could end up in a FEMA camp.  Ultimately I could end up dead.  But one thing is for sure, this is one old lady who will go down fighting.  Call me what you will, but I will never give up the fight.

Marti Oakley (c) 2008

 

Monsanto: Aspartame……Put down that diet soda it can kill you!

Leave a comment

“Aspartame contains METHANOL, a serious metabolic poison. Your body converts it to formaldehyde (embalming fluid) and formic acid (ant sting poison) both of which attack your central nervous system and every organ of your body.”

 

Source:

http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/aspartame.htm

Aspartame – the silent killer

Aspartame is marketed as NutraSweet, Equal Spoonful, Benevia, NatraTaste and since the patent on it has now expired it likely will come on the market under many different names.

 

Undoubtedly you have heard that Aspartame is a safe sweetener and people use it to loose weight. Unfortunately that information is criminally false and misleading. You can find out more about how public relations firms shape and manipulate the public’s beliefs on the “Why you believe what you believe” page.

Aspartame is made of 3 components, 50% phenylalanine, 40% aspartic acid and 10% methanol (wood alcohol). In the body methanol breaks down into formaldehyde (embalming fluid) and formic acid.

Cytogenetic effects (changes in DNA) have been shown to result from FORMALDEHYDE exposure and DNA damage occurs from FORMALDEHYDE. The nature of the injury generally involves breaking and then creation of cross linking within the genetic material which alters the cells.

This finding has been confirmed numerous times and the DNA-protein-cross-links are believed to cause cancers in experimental animals. Changes in the genetic material is associated with cancer production in humans. The ability of Aspartame to cause cellular mutations has been shown through studies by Shephard, et al. There are increases in malignant brain tumors suggested to be associated with aspartame use. FORMALDEHYDE is a known stimulant for cancer and genetic damage in the cell.

Go here to read more of this expose’ on Monsanto’s killer product.

http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/aspartame.htm

This source of information provided by Les Lemke

 

 

Whats in your Gardasil??

3 Comments

After reading numerous reports on the pro’s and con’s of Gardasil I decided I needed to check into this a little more.  I was stunned to find out that Gardasil contains;

Polysorbate 80….which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Sodium Borate….Used to kill roaches and is considered a dangerous poison.

Formaldehyde… Used for embalming

Aluminum………at the rate of 225 mcg per each of three doses (total 675mcg) a toxic level.

Gardasil is a recombinant vaccine.  Recombinant vaccines are constructed by the use of either yeast or bacteria to produce massive quanitites of an individual viral or bacterial protein based on DNA sequencing technology.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/recombinant+vaccine

recombinant vaccine…..one created by recombinant DNA technology

Recombinant vaccines are created by utilizing bacteria or yeast to produce large quantities of a single viral or bacterial protein. This protein is then purified and injected into the patient, and the patient’s immune system makes antibodies to the disease agent’s protein, protecting the patient from natural disease.

Advantages of the recombinant vaccine technology are that there is virtually no chance of the host becoming ill from the agent, since it is just a single protein, not the organism itself. Traditional vaccine risks come from the organism not being totally weakened (attenuated) or a reversion to a virulent (disease causing) form. Another advantage of a recombinant vaccine is that it does not need an adjuvant. An adjuvant is an agent that stimulates (irritates) the immune system to find and react to the vaccine agent. Some adjuvants have been implicated in causing cancer in some animals over time.

Advantages of the recombinant vaccine technology are that there is virtually no chance of the host becoming ill from the agent, since it is just a single protein, not the organism itself.

If this statement is true…………why are young girls dying from the administration of Gardasil?  Why are so many becoming ill after even the first injection?

For some answers to these and other nagging questions about the attempts to forcibly vaccinate our young women against a virus with no link to cancer go here>>>>

 

http://www.vaclib.org/news/2006/gardasil.htm

Vaccination Liberation – Information

 

Update for 2007

December 2007, “HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed:

·  The FDA has stated “HPV is not associated with cervical cancer.”

·  Evidence shows HPV vaccines actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6% in some women.

·  The FDA has admitted that “most [HPV] infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer.”

·  Why mandatory vaccination policies ultimately lead to the harming of young women.

·  [JAMA]… rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced by vaccination.”

·  The real story behind the HPV vaccination frenzy: Disease mongering, corporate profits and junk science. More on the HPV Vaccine Hoax

 

Vaccines also contain aluminum, used to excite the immune system of the body, and which considerably boosts the toxicity of mercury. When injected into children the mixture readily overpowers their nervous system to cause severe brain, neurological and allied damage.

If you know of a young woman who has been forcibly vaccinated with Gardasil and who has suffered adverse reactions including infertility, please send us your story.

Marti Oakley

 

 

 

 

Copyright Your DNA

1 Comment

The Genetic Nondiscrimination Act of 2003 (S. 1053) was passed unanimously by the senate supposedly prohibiting discrimination in employment or job promotion on the basis of genetic information and/or family history.  Exempted was the right of employers test for work associated hazards.  In addition it prohibits insurance companies from using genetic information or family history in determining who it will insure or what rates an individual or family will pay for coverage.

 

The fact that insurance companies were specifically identified as potential abusers of genetic information is clearly a statement that, attempts to abuse the information or to gain access to it was already being done. 

 

The newborn DNA databases in all 50 states is used in medical and research applications and experiments and can and usually do, include links to medical records of the entire family history of the tested individual. Blood and tissue specimens can be preserved for infinity and re-tested multiple times.  Even though parents or individuals can request destruction of the samples, you have no guarantee that the samples were destroyed, and regardless, the information that was gleaned from the samples remains on record…..meaning you have in essence destroyed nothing. 

 

Data mining, now done routinely on multiple levels by our state and federal governments, is providing information that has been gathered by ChoicePoint of Georgia, along with other companies who make a business out of gathering and selling your personal information to the FBI, and any other intelligence or government agency.  In the specific case of the FBI, there are still a few restrictions in place that disallow information gathering on US Citizens without probable cause.  With companies such as ChoicePoint, ethical or moral questions never apply to the more than one billion dollars they have been paid by the federal government to data mine your personal information. 

 

ChoicePoint has made clear its intent to construct a data base on every individual in the US and to include everything from genetic information, medical records, credit history, family history, spending habits, voting records, and every other type of information it can find on you and to compile it into billions of files that are for sale to insurance companies, researchers and experimenters, and to the government.  Companies such as ChoicePoint provide the end-run around the law by compiling and then selling as a commodity, information to agencies like the FBI, or huge insurance companies who might otherwise be prevented from having or gathering the information.

 

The attempts to track us and use the information about our genetic history don’t stop here.  The US military now has made it mandatory that military personnel be DNA tested.  The reason given is that it will make battlefield identification easier.  And it would.  But that isn’t why they are doing it and it doesn’t explain why DNA data is being stored for 75 years and subjected to massive testing and experimentation. 

 

As of December 2002, the Repository, now known as the

“Armed Forces Repository of Specimen Samples for the Identification

of Remains,

”6. contained the DNA of approximately3.2 million service members.

7 According to a recent DOD directive, the “provision of specimen samples by military members shall be mandatory.”

8. The direction to a soldier, sailor, airman,or marine to contribute a DNA sample is a lawful order which, if disobeyed, subjects the service member to prosecution

under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

9. If convicted at court-martial for the offense of violating a lawful general order, the service member carries the lifelong stigma of a federal felony conviction, and faces a maximum punishment of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.”

http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/07-08-2003.pdf

 

The actual intent of using and storing DNA is to identify genetic tendencies or traits that can be used to deny medical benefits, even when a condition is clearly a result of the actions or duties the individual is engaged in.  Even when a medical malady is clearly the result of activity related to assignment, an identified genetic predisposition can disqualify the veteran from obtaining treatment from the V.A. 

 

This DNA databank is also used routinely for experimentation for bio-weaponry, germ testing (weapons grade) among other agendas.  Donald Rumsfeld re-wrote the guidelines for germ and biological testing in 2002.  The new guidelines waive any right by the individual to informed consent for testing or experimentation with chemicals or drugs. This is does not mean the military, only  Special provisions were written in that specifically cite women and minorities as being subject to testing without informed consent and the public at large.  With these new rules, a department head in DoD, or HSD can now simply claim “national security” and basically give themselves permission to do whatever maniacal testing they choose……and you have no right whatsoever to know that they did it or, if you find out that you were secretly experimented on, to any redress against these agencies or their agents.   

 

Military personnel can request that their DNA samples be destroyed once service is completed, but here again, the individual has no way of knowing if it actually was and this request, just as with newborn DNA requests for destroying the samples, does not destroy the information gathered and stored.  It simply destroys the original blood and tissue samples….so they say.

 

Merging DNA Databases

 

In addition to the newborn DNA databanks, the FBI databanks and the Military databanks is the Criminal databank.  CODIS is a national DNA databank of convicted felons, including sex offenders.  We can all see the potential for the benefits of positive identification of predators, murderers, rapists etc., but here again something that should have been a very beneficial tool has been taken over by far more evil agendas. 

 

The Military DNA database is now merged with CODIS……that’s even if you have requested your samples be destroyed after ending your service……(this should highlight my earlier statement that the information is stored whether the samples are destroyed or not.)  CODIS, is then merged with INTERPOL.  This is the transnational criminal DNA databank and now your information has gone global.  Any government or any of its agents participating in INTERPOL is authorized to rummage through your DNA and related compiled personal files for no other reason than because it wanted to.  And, they may also use the genetic information loaded in INTERPOL to construct even more invasive testing and genetic modification programs.

 

Copyright your DNA

 

With states now claiming ownership of DNA of newborns, the military now claiming they own that database and the international efforts to catalogue every person possible, we aren’t far from the claiming of ownership of every individual.  To claim that you now own DNA of anyone other than yourself is to imply that the ownership entitles you to use as you see fit, that which you own.  It could be why human beings are now referred to as, “human capital” in such odious things as the Security & Prosperity Partnership”.  Maybe the intent all along has been to devise a means by which we become a commodity to be traded and sold on the global markets. 

 

Our DNA is the most singular identifier we have.  We are so unique that unless we are identical multiples, no one has the exact same DNA we have.  Even in the case of identical multiples, there are minute differences that can be detected.  Because this identifier is so unique to us, no one other than ourselves should have unfettered access to it, or to claim that they now own it nor should it ever be made into a salable commodity and treated as a tradable good that can be sold for profit.

 

Surveillance of large sectors of populations anywhere is now facilitated by facial imprinting, iris scans, face recognition, biometrics of all kinds, ID cards, the signal from your cell phone, the GPS on your car and video camera’s that are stashed everywhere.  The push to get us all to use cash debit cards rather than cash itself, is nothing more than an attempt to time/date stamp us to track and identify us, where we were and what we were doing.  Add genetic tracking and you have effectively devised the means by which the government decides who gets to benefit in many areas, and who will be culled out.  

 

Who is it that these governments are so afraid of that all of this effort is put into watching us, tracking us, spying on us, and now cataloguing us like cattle?  I can only conclude that it is the general population that scares the government the most.  I believe that most of us have dispensed with the “terrorist” threat and most people are aware that when the term “national security” is used, it has less to do with making sure the country is safe and most likely is just another assault on our lives and liberty.

 

The noose is tightening.

 

 

© Marti Oakley

2008

States Claiming Ownership of Newborn’s DNA

3 Comments

Unknown to most new parents, or those who became parents in the last ten or so years, DNA of newborns has been harvested, tested, stored and experimented with by all 50 states.  And all 50 states are now routinely providing these results to the Homeland Security Department. 

No doubt we can all see the benefits in testing for genetic disorders or genetic traits and tendencies that could be more adequately dealt with, in some cases actually deterring the onset of life-time illness, but that seems not to be the real thrust of these programs.  It may have been initially….but not now.

As with all good things, there are always those who seek the more evil path, in essence turning what should have been a life saving tool, a preventative measure into something insidious and inhumane.  This is what has happened to this national effort.

Here in Minnesota the state tests for 56 various genetic disorders and variants.  At least 1/3 of these tests produce a false positive meaning that a flaw was identified that actually did not exist.  Regardless, that false positive becomes part of the permanent record of the child and follows them for the rest of their lives as does any true positives.  This means that the child will eventually and most likely face discrimination in employment and the ability to gain health insurance at any cost.

There are other nagging problems with this system.  Although the national website

http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/  insists that this harvesting of DNA is a highly visible program, my own polling of parents of newborns, or the grand parents had no idea that this was being done to their children and grand children.  Further, not one knew that they had the right to demand the blood and tissue samples be destroyed after 45 days per written request.  Even had they known, and the samples were destroyed (you would have no way of knowing if they really were) the information gleaned from them would still be available and on file…..in perpetuity. 

Also unknown to at least the new parents in Minnesota, is that once that 45 days has lapsed, the state now claims that they “own” the DNA of that child.  This claimed ownership now allows the state health agency to test, tamper, alter, sell, farm out, and utilize in any way they see fit, the DNA of your newborn.  It can be manipulated, spliced with other DNA, and used in ways never intended under the screening program.

Now, there are forms that have to be signed that agree to this invasion of privacy, but the problem seems to be that this is not done during pre-natal care, but rather, at the time of delivery of the infant.  These forms are produced when the mother is ready to deliver and is being admitted to the hospital.  That’s when these “informed consent” forms are dragged out to be signed.  This is no accident.  Expectant parents simply sign what is put in front of them and are told they must sign to complete admission.  Nice, huh?  And none of them seems to be aware that what they are signing allows this right to have those additional blood and tissue samples destroyed.  No matter, the damage is done and the results of those three extra blood drops are forever recorded and along with it, a lot of genetic information about the parents.

Although this is supposed to be an opt-in program, rather than an “opt-out”, Minnesota has decided to interpret the law differently.  Our legislators have decided that opting out is the way it should be…..regardless of the law.  With that in mind they have gone one step further and declared that if the parent doesn’t specifically opt out….they are presumed to have “informed consent” and have opted in. 

I have to give the special interests in Minnesota their dues.  Federal law and the courts have upheld the concept that human DNA cannot be patented.  But these fine folks, representing insurance companies, medical institutions, and big pharma have found a way around that bothersome ruling.  Using a compliant legislature they have made sure a system has been put in place that allows them to indirectly access what should be the most private of all information, the most identifiable information concerning an individual and in the case of medical and pharmaceuticals, to use it in any way they see fit once the state claims ownership. 

In January 2007, a lady named Twila Brase president of the Citizens Council on Healthcare, issued a written testimony to the Minnesota legislature on the unethical and hidden uses of harvested DNA by the state.  The 18 page document can be located at

http://www.oah.state.mn.us/cases/health4615/nbs-pc8.pdf    

It is an eloquent treatise on the misuse of the DNA testing and the right of parents to be fully informed of what is really afoot in these programs. 

Currently, we have a monumental effort under way by Sue Jeffers to petition the state to;

Oppose illegal State government ownership of the blood, DNA and genetic test results of newborn citizens in Minnesota.  http://www.cchconline.org/petition/babyDNA2007.php  

In July 1997, solely by an executive decision of health officials-no lawthe MN Department of Health began retaining the DNA-filled blood specimens of all newborn babies.

The State now claims ownership rights to the DNA of more than 670,000 children (approx.70,000 births/yr).

In July 1986, MDH began cataloging the genetic test results of all Minnesota children. Approximately 1.4 million children are in the database.   

Oppose the dissemination of newborn blood and DNA to genetic researchers

Oppose the Minnesota Department of Health’s refusal to fully inform parents

Calls on Governor Tim Pawlenty to direct the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to comply with Minnesota state privacy law, to fully inform parents of the genetic testing process and their legal rights–and to dismantle MDH’s illegal warehouse of newborn citizen DNA. (Contact Sue Jeffers directly at: S1U2E3@aol.com )

I might suggest that each of you check the national website to determine how extensive the DNA testing is in your state, especially if you have children 10 years or younger.  What you find may sicken you.    

The idea of the state, any state, claiming ownership of the DNA of anyone, most especially newborn babies is so repugnant to me that I cannot find the words to express how offensive this is; what an unconscionable breach of humanity this comprises.  This issue is not one of party affiliation or a right vs. left drama being played out.  This is the groundwork for future discrimination that will most likely surpass employment and insurance targeting but eventually could be used to decide who lives or dies, or who can reproduce. 

There is however a level of humor in all the debating going on……insurance company reps along with those of the business sector assured everyone that these genetic tests will never be used to discriminate in employment or insurance coverage.  Now if that didn’t make you laugh, nothing will. 

But, all of us need to ask ourselves why this information would be of any use to Homeland Security?  What possible reason could they have for cataloging and storing the genetic code of any newborn child? 

In the end I find myself wondering where all these big religious fomenters are that railed against gay marriage, stem cell research, the right to choose for women and a host of other issues that would supposedly destroy the traditional American family.   Wouldn’t losing ownership of your child’s or your own DNA be far more devastating than these issues?  And yet, not one rock star preacher has spoken one word that I can find condemning this practice.  Not a peep!  It’s probably just a case of a lost message in all the speaking God does to them when he puts a “word of knowledge in their hearts” about the woes of society. 

My advice?  Find out what is happening in your own state and to what extent your state is testing and participating in this program that is so loaded with secret agendas and obviously in opposition to many state and federal laws.  Maybe what is needed is a class action lawsuit brought in each state by parents who were unaware that they or their children no longer own their own DNA.

     Marti Oakley  copyright 2008 

Minnesota DNA database of newborn’s

Leave a comment

Action Needed NOW!! Please forward.

  Please contact Governor Tim Pawlenty and other elected leaders now to tell them you oppose government ownership if DNA of newborn citizens and the distribution of baby DNA to genetic researchers without consent or legal authority. Demand the immediate dismantlement of the Minnesota Department of Health (MDA) warehouse of data and genetic testing.

The petition can be found at:

 http://www.cchconline.org/petition/babyDNA2007.php  It reads:  

I, the undersigned citizen:

  

Oppose illegal State government ownership of the blood, DNA and genetic test results of newborn citizens in Minnesota.

  In July 1997, solely by an executive decision of health officials-no law-the MN Department of Health began retaining the DNA-filled blood specimens of all newborn babies. The State now claims ownership rights to the DNA of more than 670,000 children (approx. 70,000 births/yr). In July 1986, MDH began cataloging the genetic test results of all Minnesota children. Approximately 1.4 million children are in the database.   

Oppose the dissemination of newborn blood and DNA to genetic researchers. The MDH provides baby DNA to genetic researchers without parent consent or notification. Minnesota state law does not authorize such dissemination or use for medical or genetic research.

  

Oppose failure of MDH to follow Minnesota’s Genetic Privacy Law. On August 1, 2006, the genetic privacy law went into effect. It requires \”written informed consent\” for storage use & sharing of genetic information, including baby DNA (M.S. 13.386). This is not being done.

  Oppose establishment of a State warehouse of citizen DNA: The MDH has established a databank (warehouse) for the DNA of all citizens born in Minnesota. In only eight years, the first children from whom DNA was illegally and arbitrarily confiscated will be 18-year-old adults. The DNA databank will expand annuallyl with the DNA of more than 70,000 citizens.   

Oppose the Minnesota Department of Health’s refusal to fully inform parents. MDH officials have refused to explicitly tell parents that newborn screening is government genetic testing, that State government, not the hospital, is doing the testing, and that parents have a legal right to object and to protect their children from genetic testing and research (2003 MN law).

  

I call on Governor Tim Pawlenty to direct the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to comply with Minnesota state privacy law, to fully inform parents of the genetic testing process and their legal rights–and to dismantle MDH’s illegal warehouse of newborn citizen DNA.

 Sue Jeffers 

contact Sue at:   S1U2E3@aol.com 

Please forward.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: