Home

Virus propaganda: A psyop in progress

2 Comments

John Leckrone

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For the last couple of weeks I have been telling everyone this corona virus issue is a giant psychological operation. I need to be very clear here. I am not saying that this virus does not exist nor am I saying that people are not dying from it. What I am saying is that it is an extremely convenient excuse to continue to perpetuate the power of the tyrannical corporations masquerading as “government”. It is also very convenient that most of the dead are older people with other medical conditions.

When this is all over the new “normal” will not look anything like a couple of months ago in 2019. We are being conditioned to accept seeing more government agents with costumes and guns hanging out where they were not located at a year ago. I am having flashbacks of Nazi Germany. Never forget that all 10 planks of the communist manifesto are in full effect in America. Additionally all of these tests are a great way to get people to give up their DNA so that other tests can be run as well.

I have a first hand view of how effective this psychological operation has become. I cannot get into specific details of who, thankfully no one in my family, but I will state that a woman I know has gone over the top because of the virus propaganda. Her entire world is about this virus. She watches the “news” (read propaganda) for hours on end regarding this plague. I see how it is affecting her and thus her significant other as well. It truly is sad. There is nothing wrong with being careful and using common sense to prevent the spread of this and other viruses. It does become a problem when these actions become stupid though.

The people that work with the man scratch their heads in bewilderment. This woman makes completely unrealistic demands of her room mate with regards to both his work and the people that work beside him. It became so bad at one point he asked her if she was willing to pay all of the bills and he would stay at home. As a selfish, narcissistic, greedy and tyrannical dictator she decided to shut up at that point. The people that work with him have by extension given her the dream life few people have enjoyed and she obviously does not want to give that up. In her defense she is a woman in her mid 60’s but still her wishes are completely unrealistic and bordering on insanity. This woman is the micro version of the macro system being rolled out. This thing called “government” whose agents are making just as significant and unrealistic demands upon people is getting more heavy handed by the day. I am now waiting for the first man or woman to be shot here in America for violating a prison style lock down. I have first hand knowledge that this has already happened in other parts of the world.

More

Coronavirus vs. the Mass Surveillance State: Which Poses the Greater Threat?

1 Comment

John Whitehead’s Commentary

Coronavirus vs. the Mass Surveillance State: Which Poses the Greater Threat?

John Whitehead

“If, as it seems, we are in the process of becoming a totalitarian society in which the state apparatus is all-powerful, the ethics most important for the survival of the true, free, human individual would be: cheat, lie, evade, fake it, be elsewhere, forge documents, build improved electronic gadgets in your garage that’ll outwit the gadgets used by the authorities.”—Philip K. Dick

Emboldened by the citizenry’s inattention and willingness to tolerate its abuses, the government has weaponized one national crisis after another in order to expands its powers.

The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on illegal immigration, asset forfeiture schemes, road safety schemes, school safety schemes, eminent domain: all of these programs started out as legitimate responses to pressing concerns and have since become weapons of compliance and control in the police state’s hands.

It doesn’t even matter what the nature of the crisis might be—civil unrest, the national emergencies, “unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters”—as long as it allows the government to justify all manner of government tyranny in the so-called name of national security.

Now we find ourselves on the brink of a possible coronavirus contagion.

I’ll leave the media and the medical community to speculate about the impact the coronavirus will have on the nation’s health, but how will the government’s War on the Coronavirus impact our freedoms?

For a hint of what’s in store, you can look to China—our role model for all things dystopian—where the contagion started.

In an attempt to fight the epidemic, the government has given its surveillance state apparatus—which boasts the most expansive and sophisticated surveillance system in the world—free rein. Thermal scanners using artificial intelligence (AI) have been installed at train stations in major cities to assess body temperatures and identify anyone with a fever. Facial recognition cameras and cell phone carriers track people’s movements constantly, reporting in real time to data centers that can be accessed by government agents and employers alike. And coded color alerts (red, yellow and green) sort people into health categories that correspond to the amount of freedom of movement they’re allowed: “Green code, travel freely. Red or yellow, report immediately.”

Mind you, prior to the coronavirus outbreak, the Chinese surveillance state had already been hard at work tracking its citizens through the use of some 200 million security cameras installed nationwide. Equipped with facial recognition technology, the cameras allow authorities to track so-called criminal acts, such as jaywalking, which factor into a person’s social credit score.

Social media credit scores assigned to Chinese individuals and businesses categorize them on whether or not they are “good” citizens. A real-name system—which requires people to use government-issued ID cards to buy mobile sims, obtain social media accounts, take a train, board a plane, or even buy groceries—coupled with social media credit scores ensures that those blacklisted as “unworthy” are banned from accessing financial markets, buying real estate or travelling by air or train. Among the activities that can get you labeled unworthy are taking reserved seats on trains or causing trouble in hospitals.

More

A Safe Vaccine is One that is Never Used!

Leave a comment

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

The vaccine theory is well protected within the field of medicine. In other words, if anyone speaks or writes negatively about vaccines, he or she is immediately attacked by the pharmaceutical industrial complex. This is especially true with regards to anti vaccine articles authored online.

There are a plethora of paid shills employed by pharmaceutical companies and other agencies that police the Internet comment boards. Collectively speaking, their job is to squash/ridicule any commentary that might suggest or prove that vaccines are not safe for healthcare consumers. In addition, any medical professional that speaks or writes negatively about vaccination theory will assuredly be ostracized from the medical profession.

The research that proves there are serious risks associated with administering vaccines to human beings and other living animals exists, but it is intentionally made difficult to access. Such research has clearly demonstrated that all vaccines are direct transporters of dangerous products into the human body. This in turn permanently damages the human immune system by causing targeted suppression of normal physiology that is necessary to have a healthy population free of disease.

Vaccines are designed to create antibodies in living systems that ultimately suppress biology. The suppression systems realized by these designer medicines vary, but can be used to achieve whatever effect the engineers that make them desire. This includes the planned proliferation of specific diseases as well as infertility challenges within specifically selected segments of the human population.

Within the past few years many campaigns have been launched by the powers that be inviting everybody and their uncle to send off their DNA to independent companies in order to uncover secrets about their ancestral tree. This might not be such a great idea because specific individuals as well as larger segments of the population could potentially be targeted for sterilization or harm from designer diseases.

If the wrong people get their hands on your DNA samples, you could be in trouble. People should protect their DNA as if it were their personal financial information. You don’t want a data breach taking place with regards to your personal DNA information. That kind of stolen data loaded into a vaccine could be a serious problem for all of us.

Take the time to watch the video below:

FREEDOM IN THE 21 CENTURY

1 Comment

Author, Chuck Frank

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

     While the 4th of July will be celebrated this week I will remember what those faithful patriots accomplished back in 1776 after the Declaration of Independence went into affect.  They fought for freedom and won.  By the 21 century American soldiers, Marines, the Navy and the Air Force continue to be used around the world in various military actions which has obviously not always been for the cause of freedom.  There have been other issues involved behind the scenes whether it be the lust of power, oil, gold or poppy fields.

Since 9/11 fighting terrorism has been used as an excuse to invade foreign countries in the Middle East.  Yet, there are many issues that now cloud this mission which has not only affected countries outside of our borders but at home as well. And by now, in 2019, the entire concept of freedom has taken a back seat to over taxation, global encounters whether it be war, climate change, environmentalism, sustainability, red tape, bureaucratic overreach or the outrageous and out of control legalism that now cuts into the very heart of freedom. More

Why Do They Want Our DNA?

4 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

Why are we constantly being encouraged by television shows and associated commercials to supply our DNA to different corporate entities?

Whether it’s for disease screenings or to locate long lost relatives, is it really a good idea to give out our DNA to strangers?

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

There’s an important reason not to have your DNA tested by companies that are trying to help you  screen different diseases or to find distant family members. The DNA information that you are providing is being collected by companies that can sell your private genetic secrets to Big Pharma, insurance companies and government agencies that might use the data against you.

Think of it this way; would you voluntarily hand out your social security number to strangers? Of course you wouldn’t. If someone gets hold of your social security number, he or she could steal your identity and cause you lots of financial problems. We all know this and go to a lot of trouble to protect ourselves from identity thieves.

The same mindset and caution should be practiced when it comes to DNA. DNA contains all of the unique biochemical secrets concerning our bodies and the bodies of our ancestors. When we are protective of our genetic codes, we’re not only protecting ourselves, we’re being protective of everybody in our family tree. It’s a big responsibility and one we should take very seriously.

There are plenty of people in the world that have nefarious agendas. Don’t be so eager to give them your secret genetic codes. Trust me when I write that this is not a very good idea. What you don’t really understand could quite honestly come back to hurt you and your loved ones.

What do you think about this subject?

USDA Makes GMOs Disappear

Leave a comment

Alliance for Natural Health USA

The Pulse of Natural Health Newsletter

Stay informed about what is hot in Washington and the states about natural health

It’s official: the “mandatory” GMO labeling rule will obscure more than it makes transparent. Action Alert!

The USDA has released its final GMO labeling rule, and it’s not good. As we feared when the agency released its proposal earlier this year, the so-called GMO labeling law will apply only to a narrow set of foods. Congress and the USDA have offered a number of loopholes and exemptions to food companies, undermining any semblance of a consumer’s right to know. It’s as if the USDA asked the food industry to write the rule themselves.

The problems start right at the foundation. The agency has decided to use the term “bioengineered”—a term many Americans may not be familiar with—rather than GMO. When the proposal was released, we pointed out that this is straight out of an Orwellian playbook. Many Americans know the term “GMO” and can connect it to the labeling debate—so the government decides to use a different term that sounds more innocuous. If the government was actually concerned with communicating information clearly to consumers, they would simply use the term “GMO” and not other terminology with which Americans may not be familiar.

The problems continue with the definition of “bioengineered.” The final rule defines bioengineered as a food that 1) contains genetic material that has been modified through in vitro recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques and 2) for which the modification could not otherwise be obtained through conventional breeding or found in nature”—essentially, combining DNA from two different sources, usually two different organisms.

More

Jon Rappoport: A universal flu vaccine: the mad science solution

Leave a comment

Jon Rappoport’s Blog

(To join our email list, click here.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“If you’re going to alter humans, for example, to make many of them more docile and weak, and some of them stronger, in order to restructure society, you want everyone under the umbrella. No exceptions. No exemptions.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has launched efforts to create a vaccine that would protect people from most flu strains, all at once, with a single shot.

Over the years, I’ve written many articles refuting claims that vaccines are safe and effective, but we’ll put all that aside for the moment and follow the bouncing ball.

Massachusetts Senator and big spender, Ed Markey, has introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal flu-vaccine project. You like something, it sounds good, you know nothing about the details, throw money at it.

Here is a paragraph from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches:

“NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…”

This is quite troubling, if you know what the phrase “DNA vaccine” means. It refers to what the experts are touting as the next generation of immunizations.

Instead of injecting a piece of a virus into a person, in order to stimulate the immune system, synthesized genes would be shot into the body. This isn’t traditional vaccination anymore. It’s “protective gene therapy”.

In any such method, where genes are edited, deleted, added, no matter what the pros say, there are always “unintended consequences,” to use their polite phrase. The ripple effects scramble the genetic structure in numerous unknown ways.

Here is the inconvenient truth about DNA vaccines—

They will permanently alter your DNA.

More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: