Tonight 7pm until 9pm EST
June 27, 2016
July 23, 2014
Child endangerment, Corrupt courts abusive judges, Child Endangerment, corrupt judges, corruptct, courthouse insiders, divorce Court reform, extra-constitutional fiefdoms, family court, unlicensed custody evaluators 1 Comment
Bringing corruption to a whole new level.
Divorce Corp Reform In Washington D.C November 15,16 2014
PLEASE VISIT THE LINK FOR REGISTRATION, BOOK NOW!!!!
While the movie Divorce Corp opened the eyes of many when it addressed the very real issues within our family courts nationwide, when it was in theaters in January. Thousands of people are being victimized by the family court, losing everything, in a never ending battle, hanging by a thread. Thanks’ to DIVORCE CORP the movie, for shedding the much needed light on this living nightmare.
With DIVORCE CORP REFORM
people from east to west can meet in Washington D.C November 15,16 2014
More money flows through the family courts, and into the hands of courthouse insiders, than in all other court systems in America combined – over $50 billion a year and growing. Through extensive research and interviews with the nation’s top divorce lawyers, mediators, judges, politicians, litigants and journalists, DIVORCE CORP. uncovers how children are torn from their homes, unlicensed custody evaluators extort money, and abusive judges play god with people’s lives while enriching their friends. This explosive documentary reveals the family courts as unregulated, extra-constitutional fiefdoms. Rather than assist victims of domestic crimes, these courts often precipitate them. And rather than help parents and children move on, as they are mandated to do, these courts – and their associates – drag out cases for years, sometimes decades, ultimately resulting in a rash of social ills, including home foreclosure, bankruptcy, suicide and violence. Solutions to the crisis are sought out in countries where divorce is handled in a more holistic manner.
see more: http://www.divorcecorp.com/the-film/
This information was obtained from the link above, with permission.
HOPE TO SEE YOU IN WASHINGTON D.C NOVEMBER 15,16 2014
PLEASE CONTACT US IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE YOUR STATES CONTACT
EMAIL US AT: firstname.lastname@example.org
SUBJECT LINE: YOUR STATE
BODY: NAME, PHONE NUMBER
Charges filed against Executive Director, Commission on Judicial Conduct and Associated Director, WSBA
January 23, 2014
Corrupt courts, Government BAR Association, Charges filed against Executive Director, Commission on Judicial Conduct, corrupt courts, corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, corrupt Washington, Government, Kitsap Superior Court, oath to the law, protect dishonest judges and lawyers from charges 6 Comments
Today, January 7, 2014, an information (a.k.a. indictment) was filed in Kitsap Superior Court against J. Reiko Callner, Esq., Executive Director, Commission on Judicial Conduct, and against Felice Congalton, Esq., Associate Director of the WA State Bar.
The entire indictment can be read at this link Cause quo warranto v Callner Congalton
Both Callner and Reiko are alleged to have conspired, using their government office, to protect dishonest judges and lawyers from charges of various crimes and unethical conduct.
WA State, under statutory authority RCW 7.56.020, provides for any person to file an “information” when any state official “unlawfully hold or exercise any public office” that affects the “interests” of that person.
Clearly when a judge or a lawyer violates the law in the exercise of their office these corrupt judges and lawyers breach their oath to the law and to their code of conduct. When such behavior is ‘concealed,’ as both Callner and Congalton have done, our “justice system” is reduced to a game established for the amusement of corrupt judges and lawyers. And citizens are nothing more than their play-toys in the game of who can tell the most believable lie.
The lawsuit also invokes the ‘conflict of interest’ statute, RCW 2.28.030, that forbids a lawyer from acting as judge on a case in which the lawyer has a direct interest. Clearly, all lawyers are directly interested in the laws, codes and public duty which apply to them. This lawsuit deals squarely with lawyers’ obligations to Scheidler specifically and to the public as a whole.
Allegations taken from the indictment #14-2-00042-3, against both Callner and Congalton are as follows:
First Cause of Action: Violation of RCW 9A.80.010 Official misconduct. More
July 7, 2013
Corrupt courts, radio administrative courts, attorney abuse, attorney fraud, Constitution, corrupt judges, corrupt probate courts, guardian abuse, jury vs. jury trial, Marti Oakley, radio, TS Radio, Wayne Barbuto Leave a comment
August 21, 2011
Join us Sunday evening at 5:00 CST! More
June 10, 2011
Several state supreme courts have quietly issued new “rules” that make it illegal (not unlawful) for anyone to help a pro se litigant assemble research or contribute in any way to presenting their case. These courts however, made no such ruling regarding the use of law clerks and paralegals who routinely are used by BAR members to do the actual work required to put a case together.
There are few people these day still having any illusions about the corruption in our judicial system. As we have seen and heard, our courts are the last place to find justice or to see the rule of law applied. Our courts, once the last line of defense in legal matters, have become nothing more than government sanctioned racketeering. Reports of judicial misconduct in virtually every court system in the nation, is not only on the rise, it is being condoned by the silence of the Department of Justice, congress and state governments. Even SCOTUS decided that the corruption of the lower courts was not worthy of their superior and divine attention due in part to the high level of corruption in its own court.
The term “closed shop” is used to signify an establishment, trade or skill which employs only members of the union. Our courts are closed union shops which are now actively writing new rules (lawmaking) to prevent anyone other than BAR union members from accessing the courts. We are now being told that it is accepted practice for judges to create their own laws, in total disregard for the constitution or individual rights and protections and with total disregard for established and accepted law. If this is in fact the case…..why can’t we create our own common courts that bypass these union shop courts? After all, the current judicial system no longer adheres to the law and instead operates as independent corporate contractors relying on code and statute or newly created laws they themselves create. I see no reason why we should have to continue to pay private contractors to violate our rights. More
March 15, 2011
Tuesday evenings at 7: 00 CST More
February 20, 2011
“This system of theft will continue until the entire estate has been stolen leaving the victim penniless. At this point, Medicare and Medicaid are used as the cash cow to cover medical expenses and the inflated charges of nursing, the doctors’ visits and vast amounts of medications are charged off to these services costing these services millions each year in padded billing. “
One of the worst pseudo courts in the US is the system of probate courts. Across the board, in absolutely every state is a so-called court system that operates for profit at the expense of any individual or family unfortunate enough to have any assets. By law, upon death of the estate holder, all assets are seized by the court for distribution. Supposedly these courts are charged with making sure all assets are distributed in the manner the decedent supposedly wanted yet it is estimated that 80% of heirs never receive their inheritance or receive only small portions of what was originally left to them as a result of the criminal racketeering that occurs in these courts.
Between the probate judge who has a financial interest against the estate collecting on average 6-7% of the estate nationally,(this is aside from his annual salary paid by the state and is assessed against each and every probate case in their courts) and attorneys who will land on the estates like a swarm of vultures and who misuse the courts to access the assets of the decedent while filing vexatious motions, charges and suits then charging hyper-inflated fees for these actions against the estate, there is little chance heirs will receive anything at all.
Probate begins when a person dies. The decedent’s last will and testament and death certificate are filed through probate court which sets this system of organized crime into motion. The will outlines the decedents’ final wishes including funeral arrangements and distribution of assets.
So how do living persons end up having their estates stolen by predatory guardians, crooked attorneys, and corrupted judges? After all, probate is premised upon the individual having died.
You are dead in the law! More