Home

One more time: A citizens ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ #1(MOU) with the Federal Government

20 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

Originally published in August 2009

Greetings:

Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama.  I am sure you are fully aware of the intent and implications of MOUs, as each of you, in one way or another, uses them to establish the outlining of agreements between yourselves, collectively or individually, concerning the agreements you have made with individuals acting as state’s representatives or agencies; generally to avoid Constitutional prohibitions on your intended actions and in avoidance of the Constitution.  I am using it in quite another fashion as you will see in the following text. More

Advertisements

Rosa Delauro cranks up her broom: The wicked witch of the North rides again!

Leave a comment

Marti Oakley(c) 2010 All Rights reserved

________________________________________
DeLauro (D) CT  http://delauro.house.gov 

From the statements by Rosa Delauro to the House committee:  While the administration asked for $14.2 million for this program, we do not feel it is a good use of resources to fund NAIS until the agency develops a clear plan for a mandatory system with measurable goals, long-term funding levels, and a plan for successful implementation. (emphasis mine)

Dear Ms DeLauro:

Your insistence on a mandatory system for the National Animal Identification System, one clearly rejected by the majority of the independent and family agricultural and livestock community across the nation, is not lawful.  You are a legislator and should be fully aware of this, and I believe you are.  More

“The President and Congress,A Racketeering Enterprise”

Leave a comment

Website: www.narlo.org

By Ron Ewart, President
National Association of Rural Landowners

and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues

© Copyright January 1, 2010 – All Rights Reserved

“The first entry on this page is “bribery of public officials and witnesses“.  Another federal crime to pay attention to is “conspiracy” under Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 19.”

“Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act”  (“RICO”)

Racketeer:  A person who commits crimes such as extortion, loansharking, “bribery”, “conflicts-of-interest” and obstruction of justice in furtherance of illegal activities.  (violating ones oath of office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, could be construed by a normal, reasonable and prudent person as an illegal activity.  The U. S. Congress, or any other legislative body in America, is not given carte blanche authority to do anything they damn well please just because they can get away with it.)

 Under RICO, a person who is a member of an “enterprise” that has committed any two of 27 federal crimes within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering. (for a list of federal crimes see: Cornell

Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $250,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison PER racketeering count.  In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business or enterprise gained through a pattern of “racketeering activity.”  RICO also permits a private individual harmed by the actions of such an enterprise to file a civil suit; if successful, the individual can collect treble damages. More

A Citizen’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Federal Government – MOU #3: Healthcare Reform

3 Comments

                        PPJG Original article

 September 29, 2009  

Author:  Marti Oakley (c) 2009  All RIGHTS RESERVED

 Tell a Friend 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MOU #3

Greetings:

Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama.  I am sure you are fully aware of the intent and implications of MOUs, as each of you, in one way or another, uses them to establish the outlining of agreements between yourselves, collectively or individually, concerning the agreements you have made with individuals acting as state’s representatives or agencies; generally to avoid Constitutional prohibitions on your intended actions and in avoidance of the Constitution.  I am using it in quite another fashion as you will see in the following text.

For you, MOUs are the terms and agreements of what, are in fact the first step in contractual agreements. MOUs are most often accompanied by cooperative agreements and funding (bribes) to implement what generally turns out to be egregious assaults to civil rights and liberties to the benefit of the federal government, linked so inextricably to corporate interests and global agreements.

Consider what follows a Memorandum of Understanding between me, Marti J. Oakley, and all of you, collectively cited in the above paragraph. More

Huge Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma

1 Comment

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/12/Huge-Giveaways-In-White-House-Deal-With-Big-Pharma

Click here to view the full aricle including the snip of the MOU’ with big pharma.
From:    Mercola.com
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
September 12 2009
A memo reveals that the White House and the pharmaceutical lobby secretly agreed to precisely the sort of wide-ranging deal that both parties have been denying. The memo lists precisely what the White House gave up, and what it got in return.

The White House agreed to oppose any congressional efforts to use the government’s leverage to bargain for lower drug prices or import drugs from Canada. In exchange, the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers Association (PhRMA) agreed to cut $80 billion in projected costs to taxpayers and senior citizens over ten years.

President Obama wants to keep PhRMA from opposing the bill, and benefits by having its support, which now includes a $150-million advertising campaign. That’s a fortune in politics, but it’s loose change in the pharmaceutical business.

Sources:

While representatives from both the White House and PhRMA have denied that the above deal took place, both the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times have reported otherwise.

More

A Citizen’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Federal Government – MOU #2: NATIONAL SECURITY

5 Comments

 police2_dees       

PPJG Original Article   ppjg.wordpress.com        

 September 5, 2009   10:45 p.m  CST

Author:  Marti Oakley (c) 2009 

Greetings:

Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama.  I am sure you are fully aware of the intent and implications of MOUs, as each of you, in one way or another, uses them to establish the outlining of agreements between yourselves, collectively or individually, concerning the agreements you have made with individuals acting as state’s representatives or agencies; generally to avoid Constitutional prohibitions on your intended actions and in avoidance of the Constitution.  I am using it in quite another fashion as you will see in the following text.

For you, MOUs are the terms and agreements of what, are in fact the first step in contractual agreements. MOUs are most often accompanied by cooperative agreements and funding (bribes) to implement what generally turns out to be egregious assaults to civil rights and liberties to the benefit of the federal government, linked so inextricably to corporate interests and global agreements.

Consider what follows a Memorandum of Understanding between me, Marti J. Oakley, and all of you, collectively cited in the above paragraph.

To Wit:

We (you and I) agree that each and every one of you holds your office as a result of election. And, that as a result of your victory and subsequent oath of office, you were expected to actually represent the people who put their faith and trust in you.  The fact is you have violated this oath at every opportunity regardless of which party you claim allegiance to or which political philosophy you espouse at any given time. 

In light of a profound understanding of how you have used and abused this trust and faith, I need you to understand how I (we) perceive you, i.e., your activities, your betrayals of these United States of America, your pandering to corporate interests, your illegal agreements with foreign governments and interests and ultimately what appears to be a very concerted effort to destroy our country and to convert the same into a region in some coveted global plantation.

Consider this a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to all members of the Senate, all members of the House, and to President Obama. 

Because the instances of your acts against the people are so numerous, in this MOU, I will address only this one issue:  National Security

Please consider this Memorandum of Understanding No. 2

Please be advised that no cooperative agreement with the anticipated funding (bribe money) will be forthcoming.  You may consider this an “Unfunded Mandate” in the sense that I will never contribute one dime to the re-election efforts of any one of you.  “We” in the following text means “WE THE PEOPLE.”

I (We) understand:

The term “national security” was simply the enabling and justifying of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which had been long planned and prepared prior to the attacks on 9/11 and has little to no affect on terrorist activities by foreign agents and was never intended as the primary function of this agency. When referring to DHS in this memorandum, it is to be considered inclusive of all the agencies now held and operating under the direction and control of DHS:

I (WE) understand:

We agree (you and I) that “National Security” has a different meaning and intent with regards to the corporation operating as the UNITED STATES, a.k.a., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”,  than the meaning and intent as understood by the people of the (50) sovereign states, known as the [united states of America], independent of the Corporation and that with an understanding of this difference in intent and meaning comes the true meaning of “national security” as expressed by the Corporation operating as the federal government.  That if any true and real intent was existing from foreign interests: More

Jackass Alert! USDA: Oh no you didn’t!

3 Comments

PPJG original post.  Author: Marti Oakley © August 22, 2009 4:23 pm cst

This is such a crock even I can’t believe it.  This is the actual public statement by USDA claiming they heard substantial support for NAIS/Premises ID.  What were these people smoking? 

getimage~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Officials with the Department of Agriculture said they heard

substantial support for animal disease traceability during a series of

public meetings but many animal owners indicated concerns. Cost,

privacy, bureaucracy, liability in the event of a disease outbreak,

and the religious implications of such animal identification are

behind ongoing opposition to the department’s National Animal

Identification System.” More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: