Home

Attack of the “stakeholders”…The Corporate Coup that overthrew what was left of the Republic

7 Comments

new-logo251_002IMG_20160423_144516-2Marti Oakley

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 filescacoaali_002

Everything we do is said to be a “contract”, from simply buying a cup of coffee to purchasing access to the federal government. It is necessary to view every possible action we may undertake in our daily lives as being some form of contract, no matter how idiotic the example, in order for us to accept that our government itself is one big corporate contracting monstrosity that has less to do with governing the country constitutionally, than it does as a fiduciary profiteer. Key to that profiteering is privatization of what are to be tasks and services performed by the government. Simply put, creating and/or empowering a contracting corporation to perform tasks and services the government is prohibited from engaging in outside of the the enumerated powers in the Constitution.

Interested Stakeholders

More

H.R. 3188: The groundwork for denying access to the courts on all levels

9 Comments

strip banner

new-logo25Marti Oakley        © copyright 2014 All rights reserved

________________________________________________________________

If H.R. 3188 passes and is signed into corporate contracting law and then converted to a public law, it will be used as a precedence for future obstruction of the public, by corporate federal agencies, to prevent access to the judicial system for remedy against federal encroachment.  More

Revisiting Conflicts of interest: Revoking the corporate charters of state agencies

13 Comments

 
By: Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2010-11  All Rights Reserved
1320-281-0585
 
Republished per reader requests:
______________________________________________

In each and every state, incorporated agricultural agencies and their agents have enacted and enforced rules and regulations specifically designed and enforced to interfere with the prospective economic advantage of private producers.  No where is this more apparent than in the efforts by the state agricultural agency corporations to act under “the color of law” against milk producers; setting arbitrary standards and requirements and granting themselves the authority to;

__________________________________________________

One issue seemingly untouched by the all the legal eagles out there who claim to be defending independent and family ranchers and farmers is, the conflict of interest with intent to benefit between the state corporations (in every state) operating as “Departments of Agriculture” and private and individual farmers and ranchers who are being prosecuted and persecuted as these state owned corporations are empowered to make their own laws to benefit their own interests and to enforce those laws with full knowledge that constitutional rights and protections have been fraudulently eliminated for the sovereign individuals. More

The rise of corporate federal agencies and the assumption of power

2 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

___________________

“As with USDA and FDA, this presumption will target farms, small businesses and independents and drive them out of business while blithely ignoring the real cause of any threat of greenhouse gasses by multi-national corporate contractors who openly engage these corporate federal agencies and buy their way through the system.”

________________________

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now using the same propaganda protocol as the USDA and FDA along with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and claiming a “presumption of authority”.  The idea here is to put the presumption claim into the public consciousness as “fact”.  That which is not rebutted, even if it is a fiction, stands as (fact) in the eyes of the law. 

When dealing with any presumptions of authority by any state or federal agency, look to the law that was the catalyst for either creating the agency, or directing its actions.  Neither state nor federal agency is allowed to act outside of the legislative intent.  And, even if they are acting within legislative intent, that intent cannot abrogate or violate your rights. To do so makes the creating law itself void on its inception.  More

Controlled opposition: How the private dairy industry is being coached to self destruct

Leave a comment

Tell a Friend    submit to reddit

By: Marti Oakley (c)Copyright 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

“In my considered opinion: Anyone telling you to sit down and shut up; anyone telling you they are “negotiating” your God-given right to conduct a lawful business: anyone using access to funds as leverage in an effort to control your response to these assaults, should be carefully considered.  You need to be asking yourself; “Who are these people really working for?”

A recent email I received from a gentleman in Wisconsin spoke of having to choose his alliances carefully.  Seems he had been admonished by someone in a group he was part of, to steer clear of other groups who might have the same goals in mind, but a different methodology of getting there.  Those who differed with his groups’ methodology should be avoided at all costs!  My new correspondent was taking this advice into consideration as he also considered the fact the person giving it was holding the purse strings on the account used to pay the lobbyist who supposedly was working on behalf of the group he belongs to. 

During this back and forth I was asked what I thought of selecting only a few individuals to go in front of the December 17th meeting on the two pending dietary licensing bills in Madison: SB115 AND AB440   as opposed to mobilizing a state wide effort and showing up en masse to confront the DATCP board so intent on stripping away their rights. 

My response was: More

What you need to know about food safety in America, and specifically about the fake food safety bills

Leave a comment

by Marti Oakley ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

                                                                Tell a Friend 

H.R. 2749 – The Food Safety Enhancement Act. S. 510 – The Food Safety Modernization Act, are nothing more and nothing less than the codification of Codex Alimentarius into US Code & Statute.  These bills are meant to do nothing other than centralize food production and supply in the hands of corporations, (the same industrialized corporate farming operations which cause 95% of all food borne illnesses) while at the same time driving independent farmers and herders off their land and out of business.

If you think either of these two assaults on freedom have anything to do with food safety or protecting the sovereign states from food borne illnesses, you are not only mistaken, but also extraordinarily dense. 

The federal government has no real interest in food safety other than using it as an excuse for facilitating centralization and seizing food production and sales for corporate stakeholders.  Its also going to be a fabulously effective tool for relieving property owners….of their property. 

America’s Food Safety System More

The Occupation of the United States, or…how Lincoln made slaves out of all of us.

7 Comments

In 1871, the District of Columbia (D.C.) was created and at the same time a new constitution was adopted by the 41st congress which, without authority or authorization granted itself the status of a corporation to operate within the ten dedicated miles of Washington (District of Columbia)D.C..  The UNITED STATES corporation exists only within the District under the new constitution of 1871.  As a corporation, it is bound and ruled by commercial contract law, not by the common law of the people.[1]

Lincoln suspended the constitution (the one we think we operate under) during the Civil War and established martial law.  That order has never been retracted or rescinded as required under the Lieber Code [2]. There has been no declaration of peace, nor any treaties between the newly adopted constitution and the occupied people of the formerly sovereign states, to retract the order.  We have effectively been in a state of occupation perpetrated by the corporation operating in the District of Columbia known as THE UNITED STATES or as, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (a corporation).[3]  This is opposed to the collection of sovereign states known as the United States of America.

Capitalization is an important point to take note of here.  Capitis Diminutio Maxima: (meaning a maximum loss of status or “civil death” for the individual. Through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) the individual (with rights) is reduced to slave status with no rights or in this case to a corporate trust as an entity who can own nothing. This is why any correspondence with federal agencies which have to do with taxes or legal issues with the government will have your name capitalized.  This capitalization is a notice to you that;

a) You are a corporately held trust no different than any other commodity and have no human status.

b) You will appear in an administrative court rather than a judicial court and cannot use the constitution to defend yourself because the Uniform Commercial Code will be administrated as per contract commercial law, not the common law.

There have not been any judges in America since 1789. There are only Administrators. This is why so called “judges” are appointed and not elected.  Administrators, not judges, are appointed by federal and state officials to administer commercial contract law using the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).  Which I guess would explain how people with no law background become “judges”.  Judges administer law, while administrators administer codes and statutes. [4]

Commercial contract law (UCC) is used to override the common law that we believe we are living under via the constitution. Our court systems are nothing more than a web of administrative courts which administer the law of contracts.  In order for the law of contracts to apply to you, you must first enter into a contract with the corporation: in this case, THE UNITED STATES (a corporation).  To enter into this contract you simply have to register to vote, file a birth certificate, apply for government provided benefits of any kind, get a driver license, apply for a business license, pay a fee for permission to use or access government owned properties (parks, etc.) or waterways.  There is no instance when your interaction with what we know as THE UNITED STATES (a corporation) does not result in you automatically being entered into contract with said corporation.  Once done, you have ceased to be a human individual in the eyes of the government and now are reduced to a corporate trust (an entity) and vulnerable and subject to the law of contracts. 

How does this happen?  Ever hear of something called an “adhesion contract”?  These are contracts with irrevocable terms which never change.  Each and every time you sign your name for taxes, licenses or government benefits you are in effect renewing the contract.  This renewal or even first time signing is a statement to the effect that you agree to the control of the federal government (a corporation controlled by contract law) and have forfeited your rights to constitutional protections.  In the case of taxes unless you sign the w-2 or the Form 1040 or any of the other forms, in essence agreeing to the contract you are not obliged to pay.

The one advantage to all of this is that under the laws of contracts, you the signatory, must be informed in advance of all provisions of the contract.  In lieu of this you can revoke your signature and be repaid all funds paid into Social Security and taxes going back to the original and first time you entered into the contract unknowingly.

 

You should also be made aware that “citizens of the UNITED STATES” includes only those people living within the corporate ten mile boundary of the District of Columbia. Using this basis for defining who was and was not a citizen enabled the changes to the original “Trading With the Enemies Act” of 1917. Under the original law it described “enemies of the state” as “other than citizens of the United States.”

Section 2 subdivision ( c ) Chapter 106

 

Trading with the Enemy Act of Oct. 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b “…any person within the United States.”

H.R. 1491 Public No. 1.”

 

Notice in both cases that United States is not capitalized, so neither version of this act is applied to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.    It applies to the common citizen of the occupied collective states, or the United States. 

 

So all this time, I, who prided myself on actually reading the Constitution, assuring myself that I knew what my rights were, what the laws were, and thoroughly convinced that a return to the Constitution would reverse all the devastation heaped on us by one corrupt administration after another; one spineless congress after another have had to admit that we have no options left to us.   All of us who are here now and those to come, have and will exist in servitude to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES.

 

Some days it’s good to be old.

 

© 2008 Marti Oakley

 

[1]With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62). Act 1871 allows the “Corp US” to control the country in the place of the natural Government
http://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdf

 

[2]Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (Lieber Code). 24 April 1863.

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/73cb71d18dc4372741256739003e6372/a25aa5871a04919bc12563cd002d65c5?OpenDocument

[3]http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002—-000-.html

(15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

 

 [4]FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 1Stat.138-178

 

From SourceWatch   http://www.sourcewatch.org/

The Trading With the Enemy Act, Title 12, §95(a) and §95(b) of the United States Code, is considered by many to constitute a declaration of war made in 1933 against the people of the United States by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.[1]

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Trading_With_the_Enemy_Act

%d bloggers like this: