Home

US code #7 Agriculture: Still not within the powers granted to the federal government

16 Comments

new-logo25Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2013 All Rights Reserved

PLEASE NOTE THE EDITED PARGRAPHS AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE DEALING WITH “CONSENT”.  THIS WAS A POINT I MISSED WHICH IS VERY IMPORTANT.

___________________________________________________________________

The agricultural surveys are being sent out once again with a note on the front of the envelope stating “YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW”.  Actually not.  This statement is mis-leading, meant to intimidate and is completely false.  Title 7 Agriculture, is non-positive code & title.  This means the activities described and mandated under this code can only being cited as prima facie evidence, meaning homeland-poster-414421the wording can be cited as existing but cannot be used to bring criminal charges or used as the basis for declaring any right as illegal. It cannot be used or cited as an underlying authority for, as in this instance, declaring an unlawful survey  disguised as a “census” to be mandatory.   Prima facie is the assumption that something exist as other than what it actually is.  It takes little to determine that Title 7 is not lawful or constitutional.

The USDA nor any of the other alphabet agencies that exist as a result of non-positive code & title have no underlying authority except in the District of Criminals, insular possessions and territories occupied.  In the sovereign states, they have no force of law……..because they are NOT law.  These codes and titles exist as a wish list that has been foisted on the states with the help of your governors and state legislators who enabled them to contract with similar agencies in your state.  If you were not party to those contracts, (and you were not),if they were never revealed to you as existing (and they were not) and if you never signed your name agreeing to what is essentially the business plan of private corporations, you cannot be compelled to comply with the contract.  No state agency, regardless of whom it contracts with, can force those who were not party to the contract, to comply.

But don’t let this make you think a van load of jack-booted thugs from USDA won’t show up at your door, seize your assets and intimidate your family after unlawfully trespassing your property, most likely with the help of your local sheriff who is supposed to protect you from such incidences.  The law means absolutely nothing to these people.

Ultimately, Title 7 Agriculture, as with numerous other non-positive codes and titles, remains out of the lawful, constitutional reach of the federal corporation no matter how many egregious laws congress passes.  Agriculture is not in the powers enumerated for the federal government.

********************************************************

USDA Gearing Up to Conduct 2012 Census of Agriculture

National Agricultural Classification Survey is an Important Step toward a Complete Count
Washington, February 10, 2012 – Surveys are now arriving in mailboxes around the nation to help identify all active farms in the United States. The National Agricultural Classification Survey (NACS), which asks landowners whether or not they are farming and for basic farm information, is one of the most important early steps used to determine who should receive a 2012 Census of Agriculture report form. The Census of Agriculture, conducted every five years by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), is a complete count of U.S. farms and ranches and the people who operate them.

FROM THE USDA SITE.

http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Newsroo…02_10_2012.php

We are asking everyone who receives the NACS to respond even if they are not farming so that we build the most accurate and comprehensive mailing list to account for all of U.S. agriculture in the Census,” said NASS’s Census and Survey Director, Renee Picanso. “The Census is the leading source of facts about American agriculture and the only source of agricultural statistics that is comparable for each county in the nation. Farm organizations, businesses, government decision-makers, commodity market analysts, news media, researchers and others use Census data to inform their work.”

NACS is required by law as part of the U.S. Census of Agriculture. By this same law, all information reported by individuals is kept confidential. NASS will mail the 2012 Census of Agriculture later this year and data will be collected into early 2013.

“The NACS survey is the first step in getting a complete count, so we ask everyone who receives a survey to complete and return it,” said Picanso. “The Census is a valuable way for producers and rural America to show their strength – in numbers.”

The 2012 Census of Agriculture is your voice, your future, your responsibility. For more information about NACS, the Census of Agriculture, or to add your name to the Census mail list, visit

www.agcensus.usda.gov.

NASS provides accurate, timely, useful and objective statistics in service to U.S. agriculture. We invite you to provide feedback on our products and services. Sign up at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/subscriptions and look for “NASS Data User Community.”

*****************************************************************

This Census is a valuable way for the USDA to manipulate markets, to map out who and where food is being produced that might interfere with global producers, say for instance, Monsanto.

The Census is a valuable way for producers and rural America to show their strength – in numbers.”  The first question here would have to be, “In what possible way?”  It is the numbers they are after.  Just how big is the remaining, dwindling independent and family ranching and farming community and what is it likely to take to put them out of business? More

The USDA Agricultural survey: Voluntary not mandatory

44 Comments

 

Marti Oakley (c) copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved

_______________________________________________________

The USDA is busy sending out its Agricultural Survey attempting to elicit from unwary property owners, information regarding any agricultural production or livestock or poultry (this can be virtually ANY crop, animal or bird) that you may own and goes on to ask how much monetary value is placed on produce or the sale of animal/poultry products.  The [survey] also mentions that any one who produces and sells more than $1,000 per year is asked to voluntarily supply this information to the government.  $1,000 a year is such a paltry amount and is significant in the fact that this amount is so low as to encompass virtually anything you might wish to grow and produce even for your own use.  It would be virtually impossible for the federal government to confiscate food sources in the event they decide they must, unless they know first hand where that source is located and how much of it is there. 

This is a voluntary survey and is not a [census].  Survey’s are voluntary, the census taken every ten years to do a head count of our population is not. 

In a cleverly worded promotion on the USDA website: More

Another Bureaucratic Bungle:Apparently, the U.S. Census Bureau did not get the memo.

4 Comments

by: Dan Martin  (c)copyright 2010

Apparently, the U.S. Census Bureau did not get the memo.

Everyone in our hometown has a Post Office Box. We do not pay anything for them. Our only choice in the matter is a) P.O. Box or b) no mail. There is no house-to-house delivery in our town.

We are not unique in this. There are at least eleven other towns within 12.5 miles of where I sit that have the same arrangement for getting their mail.

Today I learned from our Agent In Charge (read: Postmaster) that all of the Census forms were returned because they bore addresses that, technically, do not exist. The Census Bureau, according to the Agent, does not send Census forms to P.O. Boxes. The Post Office is not at liberty to “box” the mail, even if the box number is a part of the address or the zip code.

The Agent will mercifully remain unnamed. That person does not make policy; their responsibility is merely to carry it out.

According to the Census Bureau: More

Owning The ‘United States®’

Leave a comment

rense.com 

http://www.rense.com/general90/own.htm

UNITED STATES CENSUS 2010

The Census envelope arrived yesterday and with it came some very interesting new information. On the face of the envelope under the line: U. S. Census Form Enclosed is the very large and very bold STATEMENT:

YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW

Then centered at the top of the Envelope was this ‘creative’ Logo from the U. S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, U. S. Census Bureau

Under a magnifying glass, you can easily read the “R” inside the circle directly to the right of the “s” in ‘United States’. This symbol “®” stands for “registered” as in a commercial registration of this image; indicating that the phrase it follows is privately owned and that any use of it (in this case the two words ‘United States’) beyond the ‘owners’ specific authorization is prohibited!

THE QUESTION IS:

“Who OWNS the registration of the words ‘United States’ when these two words are being used together to define not just an aspect of this Republic; but the entirety of the nation as a state and as a country? And: If those two words can be privately owned and then used in the process that counts the people, to determine how much money each district will receive, based on population-numbers: What does this say about the “nation” that has now obviously become privately owned; not to mention the people within what has become a privately held corporation? Have the people of what was the United States without the®, been purchased; along with the actual former name of this country?

So – WHO OWNS US! – NOW”

kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net

Census U.S. Lockheed Martin/IBM: video

3 Comments

 Census U.S. Lockheed Martin/IBM:  The US census is only allowed to ask how many people in your home.  Nothing allows it to gps coordinate your door with information or to conduct community surveys.  This is a must watch video

       Matrix News.

The following questions were asked of the American Census Bureau.  They backed down from an initial agreement to go on the Matrix show:

EXCERPTS TRANSCRIBED FROM THE MATRIX NEWS YOUTUBE: More

The US Cencus: From enumeration to intrusion

Leave a comment

 
 
CCHC Health Care News

Citizens’ Council on Health Care
www.healthcarefreedom.us
Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Click here to read the full document: http://www.cchconline.org/pdf/CENSUS_PAPER_2010_FINAL.pdf

 by Twila Brase and Jenna Minegar*

Starting March 15, 2010, the 2010 U.S. Census forms will be sent out nationwide.
Since the first census in 1790, the U.S. Constitution has upheld the U.S. Census as a means of counting citizens to properly apportion Representatives and direct taxes among the 50 states. While enumeration continues to be one portion of the Census, the overall purpose of the Census has shifted as the nation has developed and grown.
The U.S. Census and the American Community Survey now collect additional private data on Americans, including information on health status and medical conditions. The shift from enumeration to data collection has raised significant privacy concerns for Americans.  Some citizens have opted out of the Census or limited their responses despite the risk of financial penalties.
The U.S. Census Bureau has acknowledged the public’s concern, but failed to recognize the unconstitutional nature of these intrusions. Furthermore, federal officials have failed to acknowledge the shift from enumeration to intrusion as the source of higher costs and poor compliance. The problem, however, is not the American people.
The problem is the intrusiveness nature of the Census. One renowned financial leader offers a better way.

 

 

 

Executive Summary
 

 

Census: penalties for failing to comply

1 Comment

US Code & Title are rules and regulations for the corporate federal government. They do not recognize or pretend to adhere to constitutional provisions, protections or requirements.   You’ll note this was enacted citing the Department of Commerce and using commerce as the basis of authority ……putting you into Maritime/Admiralty law and out of common law. 

TITLE 13 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER II > § 221

§ 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers More

Older Entries

%d bloggers like this: