Home

Dr. John Reizer: Gambling With Your Life

Leave a comment

By Dr. John Reizer

American healthcare consumers are gambling with their lives each and every day. By taking various prescription and non prescription medications, that have deadly side effects attached to them, human Guinea pigs regularly roll the dice when they swallow, inject, and inhale suppressive pharmaceutical products that block the regular expressions of physiology in their bodies.

Here’s the wager most people are willing to make: I’ll bet my future health and well-being will not be irreparably damaged from the drugs I decide to take. The payoff; I will hopefully receive some sort of temporary change in the symptoms I am experiencing, or a lab value will move in a direction that’s been touted by experts as being a good one.

How crazy and delusional are people when they place their faith and trust in toxic products that have been manufactured by for profit drug companies? The short answer, pretty damn crazy and delusional. More

10 Reasons 5G Should Scare the @#$% Out of You

Leave a comment

Like every “next generation” wireless network technology, 5G will give your phone a speedier connection — about 10 times faster than 4G, industry experts expect.

 

SMART METER NEWS

1 Comment

SMART METER NEWS

 

The NTP studies clearly show that non-ionizing radiation can cause cancers and other adverse health effects

Some WNC residents have concerns about installation, safety of Duke’s smart meters

Free EMF Q&A Replay with Nick Pineault – The Truth About EMF Radiation

Wind turbines make waves: Why some residents near wind turbines become illnon-ionizing radiation, 

Cell Phone Radiation Leads to Cancer, Says U.S. NTP in Final Report Cancer Link Was Once Thought Impossible

The NTP studies clearly show that non-ionizing radiation can cause cancers and other adverse health effects

Petition: Stop Mobile Towers Staining our World Heritage Landscapes:

 

 

 

Chemotherapy Does NOT Work 97% of The Time and Kills 97% of The Time

3 Comments

In 2004, the Journal of Clinical Oncology published a study about chemotherapy’s success rates when looking at how many cancer patients were still alive after 5 years. It states: RESULTS:
The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA. CONCLUSION:
As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival.
To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required. You’d be hard pressed to find anything still being touted as your best shot at a cure with an average success rate of just over 2 percent, which chemotherapy has, if it wasn’t for the fact that big profits were driving the recommendation. For stage 4 cancers the rate is less than half of one percent.
Fundamentally, chemotherapy rarely works. Worse, some drug treatments also promote the spread of cancer. But somehow the rationale to avoid these agents because they might promote cancer does not apply when it comes to drugs. – A Cancer Journal for the Clinician article concludes by stating: “Pending the publication of suitable trials, clinicians must be guided by existing data in the context of a fundamental principle of medicine, “Primum non nocere.” (First do no harm.) ” And yet, conventional cancer treatments can in no way, shape or form ever be considered harmless. “…as a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.” Alan C Nixon, PhD, former president of the American Chemical Society – https://www.burtongoldberg.com/home/b…

 

 

 

 

Over 2,000 Cancer Victims near Ft. Detrick, Maryland

5 Comments

The Kristen Renee Foundation has identified 2,717 cancer victims within 3 miles of Fort Detrick, MD.
http://www.kristenrenee.org/cancer-maps

The U.S. Army has requested a federal court to dismiss a class-action lawsuit filed last August by residents of Frederick, Md., seeking $750 million in compensation for the deaths and illnesses caused by contaminated soil and groundwater at Fort Detrick.

Decades ago, the Army dumped sludge from its former decontamination plants, ashes from its incinerators, and potentially radioactive sludge from a sewage disposal plant, drums of the industrial solvent trichloroethylene and other hazardous substances into unlined pits at the post’s Area B, reported by the Frederick News-Post. About 200 people are involved in the suit, which claims the contaminants are responsible for cancer and other terminal illnesses they or their relatives experienced.

Read more:
Army Seeks to Dismiss Class-Action Suit over Contamination at Ft. Derick. Defense Communities.

Don’t Criticize What You Can’t Understand (About the Science of Vaccine Neurotoxicity)

4 Comments

Duty to Warn

A Collection of Recent Journal Articles Solidifying the Connections Between America’s Over-Vaccination Agenda and the Epidemics of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Chronic Autoimmune Disorders

 

 Gary G. Kohls, MD – July 4, 2017

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“It is a near certainty that the AMA, the AAP, the IOM – and the recent critics of this column’s statements of scientific fact regarding the many dangers of the neurotoxicity of America’s over-vaccination programs – have little or no knowledge of the following research studies that totally debunk their claims that all vaccines are both safe and effective and that Big Medicine and Big Pharma can be trusted to implement their over-vaccination agendas, even to the point of forcibly vaccinating people against their wills.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In an obscure interview back in 1956, the entertainer Elvis Presley was quoted as saying: “Don’t criticize what you don’t understand, son. You never walked in that man’s shoes.” But But none of Elvis’s many song-writers ever wrote a song that included that wonderful truism.

However, Bob Dylan, in his iconic “The Times They Are A-Changing” (1962), immortalized the phrase. It is not likely that Dylan stole the phrase from one of Presley’s songs because Elvis once admitted: “I’ve never written a song in my life.”

Dylan’s poetic truism has always stayed with me. To remind readers of its power, here is the fourth verse of that song:

“Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don’t criticize
What you can’t understand

Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is rapidly agin’
Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin’.

There is a surge of anti-intellectualism and anti-science belief systems in the United States. People who know nothing about climate science are ridiculing altruistic climate scientists who know what they are talking about. Respected, unbiased scientists (those who are not in the back pockets of the fossil fuel and coal industries) are fulfilling their moral duty to warn the rest of us about the imminent danger of potentially unstoppable – and catastrophic – warming of the planet, a reality that could easily make the planet unlivable for animal life n the near future (like the gradually expanding Sahara Desert has been exhibiting for us for years).

Unbiased geological scientists, scholars and assorted well-informed citizen activists (at least those who have not been hired and thus co-opted by Big Mining) understand the potentially catastrophic dangers of sulfide mining that is threatening my home state of Minnesota. These altruistic scientists and citizen activists are being viciously demonized (even with death threats) by some folks who happen to live in the boom-and-bust (non-sulfide) iron ore country that now has commercially-viable copper sulfide ore deposits in the water-rich part of the state. More

Seriously Eye-Opening New Info About Cancer

1 Comment

March Against Monsanto

A revolution is building and it’s imperative for the health of you and your loved ones to join it!

We are under attack on all fronts — food, water, medicine.

Monsanto’s cancer-causing herbicides are used to grow the food that lines much of our grocery store shelves.

It was recently disclosed that chromium-6, the extremely toxic chemical made famous by the movie Erin Brockovich, has been found in the water supply of all 50 states, affecting more than 200 million Americans.

The vaccine safety movement is waving a giant red flag over the numerous, harmful ingredients being injected into children — chemicals like aluminum, formaldehyde, and Monsanto’s glyphosate (Roundup), which has never once been tested for safety as an injectable.

Is it any wonder that brain cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in children? 

Is it a surprise that cancer will affect every 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women?

We have been lied to when it comes to the “treatment” of cancer in traditional medicine. Fear is used to push Big Pharma’s lethal chemotherapy treatments, despite studies showing chemo actually makes cancer worse.

Get educated on a whole different universe of cancer treatments and prevention!

Treatments and healing methods being developed around the world by brilliant men and women willing to toss tradition to the side and champion health and well being and exploring EVERY option…

Read More

Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination

3 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011

___________________________________________

This 2 hour +, documentary gives a detailed and documented look at the history of vaccines.  If you think vaccines actually work, or, that vaccines will prevent disease….think again.  That is not their purpose.  Under US code we are defined as animal “pests” and can be targeted for erradication at any time. 

  channel on YouTube:

Part 1 The definitive look into the history of vaccination. From cancer, to autism, to the purposeful sterilization of innocent people around the globe, find out why all of these things are perfectly legal according to U.S. CODE – why the government considers you no different than cattle in their own law.

 

Healthcare scoring for the “dead pool”: hedge funds betting on how long you will live

3 Comments

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved

_________________________________________

“The solution? A bond made up of life settlements would ideally have policies from people with a range of diseases — leukemia, lung cancer, heart disease, breast cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s. That is because if too many people with leukemia are in the securitization portfolio, and a cure is developed, the value of the bond would plummet.” 

_________________________________________

Those medical records that are now available to anyone and everyone who might have a financial interest in your “health” (the same records about you that you yourself can no longer gain access to in most cases),  are for sale to stakeholders, investors and interested party’s.  Insurance companies are particularly interested.

As we stated in an earlier article, when Obamacare is implemented it will establish a health score to be applied to your records and updated with each doctor visit. This score will be available to insurance companies with the accompanying medical data that will allow them to determine how much of a risk you pose to the profits they anticipate by insuring you under a hedge fund.

You will be rated as to how much of a risk you represent to the system.  This score is being used to determine what and how much healthcare you are eligible to receive.  As the bill clearly states, panels will determine what risk you pose to the system and weigh that against the odds you can recover, and if you do, what would be the value of your future contributions to society?  Odds not good?  Off to the dead pool you go!

Enter the insurance companies.  More

The Dangers of Whole Body Scanners

2 Comments

Here is a video with G. Edward Griffin about the dangers of whole-body scanners (G. Edward wrote a book about cancer) and Idaho State Legislator Phil Hart who has written legislation to get rid of the machines and to test their safety (if proven safe, then they could only be used as a secondary screening devices).
This video is important because it pinpoints the jurisdiction over the scanners (the States, when health or safety is an issue) and there is a link for Hart’s model legislation.

HB573 – Whole-Body Scanner Legislation

Adds to existing law relating to homeland security to provide for limitations on whole-body imaging; to provide for findings and reporting by the Chief of the Bureau of Homeland Security for the state of Idaho.

Download HB 573 (PDF)

Fluoride Network News: fluoride as “neurotoxic and possibly tumorogenic if swallowed.

Leave a comment

Meanwhile, there have been four important developments to which we would like to draw your attention:

1) TIME MAGAZINE in its April 12th issue has an article discussing common household toxics to which we and our kids are exposed. TIME lists fluoride in its “Top 10 Common Household Toxins.” They describe fluoride as “neurotoxic and possibly tumorogenic if swallowed.”  

2) LOUISIANA:  Legislation is advancing in the Senate to forbid the purchase of water fluoridation chemicals from China. The Advocate, April 14.

3)  SOUTHAMPTON UK:  Lib Dem, Tory and Green candidates for the parliamentary seats in Southampton have said they opposed plans to add fluoride to the city’s tap water. BBC News, April 10.

4)  WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA:  Carol Clinch of People for Safe Drinking Water is challenging the legality of using hydrofluorosilic acid to fluoridate Waterloo’s drinking water by filing a complaint with Health Canada.  Waterloo Chronicle, April 14.

Slowly the wheels seem to be turning in our direction.

Paul

###

A Serious Warning about Nano-Technology in Cosmeceuticals

Leave a comment

Live Link: MERCOLA.com 

Dr. Epstein’s background makes him exceptionally well-qualified to discuss topics related to cancer prevention, and the toxicological causes of cancer that must be part of any effective cancer prevention plan.

In this interview he offers a vital overview of four topics, three of them related to toxic exposures that promote cancer, and lastly, he raises an urgently important question: With everything we already know about cancer, why is prevention completely ignored in the government’s cancer plan?

Once you look at what’s being done, and more importantly, what’s NOT being done, cancer starts to look like a profitable business plan in and of itself. Only when viewed under this loupe does ignoring cancer prevention make sense.

A Serious Warning about Nano-Technology in Cosmeceuticals More

Rep. Rogers of Michigan: Your survival of cancer is now reduced

Leave a comment

Rep. Rogers from Michigan highlights the government takeover of healthcare.  Rogers points out the bill is punnishment not only for individuals, but also for businesses who will now be subject to government control.

Find out rest of the story on raw milk

Leave a comment

NEWS-LEADER.COM 

Springfield, Missouri
By: Kathy Vimont

My family produces raw milk in southwest Missouri. I am responding to Douglas Bryan’s letter of Dec. 9 regarding the safety of raw milk.

Dr. Bryan quoted an explanation from Cornell about why pasteurization has been made mandatory for retail sales, but he doesn’t know the rest of the story. About 100 years ago, large amounts of milk were needed to feed people in the large cities. They also needed an answer about what to do with the distillery grain left over from making alcohol there. Answer: feed it to cows and use the resulting milk to feed the people. They should not have been drinking that milk.

It was produced in filthy conditions by very unhealthy animals and caused many deaths. Their only answer was to pasteurize the milk, and that’s how pasteurization on a large scale became entrenched. But, here’s the really interesting part: at that same time, Dr. J.R. Crewe of the Mayo Clinic was bringing in clean raw milk from the countryside and curing patients of cancer and other dread diseases with a strict raw milk diet. For more on this story and a critical analysis of milk safety studies, I refer you to “The Untold Story of Milk” by Dr. Ron Schmid.  Go to: http://www.realmilk.com/documents/ResponsetoMarlerListofStudies.pdf

for a balancing article on the safety of raw milk.

Considering modern advancements, the belief that we must pasteurize or die is outdated. Besides, we’re not talking about producing raw milk for the entire population; we’re talking about small family farms thriving and supporting our local economies. Buying milk from neighbors is a long-standing tradition in Missouri, one with which the legislature refused to interfere. READ MORE

CIA Assassinations & Depopulation Using Vaccinations:

4 Comments

Tetrahedron, LLC
Health Science Communications for People Around the World

SPECIAL REPORT                     

Release: No. CIA-1
Date Mailed: July 17, 2009
For Immediate Release
Contact: Jackie Lindenbach–(208) 265-8065

A Conspiracy Reality Underlies the Swine Flu Black Op

Los Angeles–CIA assassinations and paramilitary operations secreted from congressional overseers and the American people have extended into the realm of swine flu bioterrorism and vaccinations for profitable depopulation according to medical journalist and CIA analyst, Dr. Leonard Horowitz.

The CIA spent years advancing secret squads to blow things up and kill humans according to U.S. intelligence officials interviewed by Greg Miller of the Los Angeles Times. (July 16, 2009) What the Times failed to report was current connections between drug industrialists and CIA officials that best explain the mysterious emergence of the swine flu virus in Mexico, and the international media’s curious response to the planned pandemic, according to Dr. Horowitz–a Harvard-trained investigator and award-winning author of several books on this subject.

Current and former U.S. intelligence officials disclosed a broader effort than media coverage has portrayed, including black-ops about which congressional oversight committees and Americans knew nothing, the Times published. More

Evidence is revealed DU rods and sabots survived the inferno at Doha

Leave a comment

http://www.paltelegraph.com/middle-east/77-middle-east/1171-exclusive-3-evidence-is-revealed-du-rods-and-sabots-survived-the-inferno-at-camp-doha

Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant and special writer for the Palestine Telegraph

diplated-uraniom-gaza-war-israel_copy

London, June 21, (Pal Telegraph) – Doug Rokke earned his B.S. in Physics at Western Illinois University followed by his M.S. and Ph.D. in physics and technology education at the University of Illinois. His military career has spanned 4 decades to include combat duty during the Vietnam War and Gulf War 1.

Dr. Doug Rokke is a Depleted Uranium expert.

Doug served as a member of the 3rd U.S. Army Medical Command’s Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) teaching, medical response, and special operations team, the 3rd U.S. Army captured equipment project team, and with the 3rd U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Assessment team during Gulf War 1(Operation Desert Storm). More

Sowing Seeds of Starvation: Monsanto Hype in Growing Food Crisis

1 Comment

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/06/06/Sowing-Seeds-of-Starvation-Monsanto-Hype-in-Growing-Food-Crisis.aspx

An ad that recently ran during the American Public Media show Marketplace, sponsored by Monsanto, the world’s largest corporate agribusiness chemical firm, touted how Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) seeds are going to save the world from environmental catastrophe and human hunger.

The Monsanto ads are, quite simply, false. The premise of the ad is that Monsanto’s GM seeds are going to save the world from environmental catastrophe and human hunger, but the reality of Monsanto’s seeds and the company’s ethics and commitment to fighting world hunger have little to do with either.

Eighty-five percent of all GM seeds are engineered for herbicide tolerance, most of these being Monsanto’s “Roundup Ready” cotton, corn, soy, and canola seeds. This allows plants to withstand significant amounts of pesticides being sprayed on it, in effect promoting pesticide use. As a result, there has been an increase in pesticide use in the United States since the introduction of GM seeds. Since the introduction of GM crops in the United States, more than 120 million pounds of additional pesticides were used.

At the same time, not a single GM crop has been commercially introduced that is intended to increase yield. Agronomists and plant scientists made far greater advances in yields through conventional breeding methods than they ever have with GM crops. In fact, there have been several studies which show that there are actually yield losses associated with Monsanto’s Roundup Ready soybeans. GM crops are not feeding the world, and they are not enabling us to produce more.

Monsanto wants you to believe their crops are feeding hungry children in Africa, and that they are allowing farmers to use fewer chemicals. But do their actions demonstrate that their concern lies solely in their profits?

  Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

 

Anyone who believes Monsanto’s proclamations of saving the world from environmental catastrophe and hunger is clearly not paying attention to some very blatant signs that this is not true.

It’s unfortunate that the U.S. has yet to follow the decision of several other countries that have already banned genetically modified crops. Germany, for example, recently became the sixth country in the European Union to take a stand against GM corn. Meanwhile, tens of millions of acres of GM corn are being planted in the U.S.

According to the French Professor Gilles-Eric Seralini, a molecular endocrinologist and a member of two French government commissions evaluating GM food, the corn variety in question, called MON 810, has shown statistically significant problems in animal studies.

They found the effects of the GM crops were similar to that of pesticides, causing inflammation disorders, and problems with livers and kidneys, two major organs involved with detoxification.

Another scientist, biology professor Bela Darvas of Hungary‘s Debrecen University, discovered that Monsanto’s Mon 810 is lethal to two Hungarian protected species.

So how does Monsanto respond to Darvas’ disturbing findings?

They simply refuse to give him any more Mon 810 corn to use in his tests. They’ve also refused his request for Mon 863, another GM variety. Is that really the enlightened action of an environmentally sensitive company that is looking out for not only your health, but the wellbeing of the planet?

Common GMO Myths

As The GM-Free Ireland Network points out, there are numerous GM biotechnology propaganda myths in circulation, and none of them are true. If you’ve been paying attention to the news about genetically modified plants, you’ve probably heard some of them already. (For the full list, please see this pdf.)

Myth #1: Genetic engineering is a continuation of traditional breeding methods

In fact, most GM crops are modified with the introduction of DNA from other species entirely. This never occurs in nature, or with traditional breeding methods.

Myth #2: Opponents of GM food are anti-science

Leading opponents of GM foods include the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Independent Science Panel, the U.S. Center for Food Safety, and numerous agronomic, environmental, and health scientists.

Myth #3: GM crops have higher yields

GM crop seeds currently on the market do not increase yields, and are not designed to. In fact, GM crops typically render lower yields.

For example, GM soya has decreased yields by up to 20 percent compared with non-GM soya. And up to 100 percent failures of Bt cotton have been recorded in India. This in turn has spurred a staggering number of suicides among India’s farmers. According to the National Crime Records Bureau of India, more than 182,900 Indian farmers took their own lives between 1997 and 2007, potentially due to GM crop failures. An estimated 46 Indian farmers commit suicide every day.

Additionally, recent studies by scientists from the USDA and the University of Georgia found that growing GM cotton in the U.S. can result in a drop in income by up to 40 percent.

Myth #4: Americans have been eating GM foods for 15 years without any health problems

This one is perhaps most deceptive as GM foods are not labeled in the U.S., which makes traceability and accountability impossible. There may or may not be obvious health problems, but it is carefully designed so that no one can find out for sure.

However, according to Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, what we do know is that between 1994 and 2001 – at the same time as GMO’s flooded the market – food related illnesses DOUBLED. 

His findings show that GMO foods can be: 

  • Allergenic
  • Toxic
  • Carcinogenic
  • Anti-nutritional

Although the major food giants are carrying on with their claim that GM foods are no different from conventionally grown varieties, the research says otherwise.

For example, GM peas were found to cause lung damage in mice; GM potatoes have been linked to cancer in rats; and bacteria in the human gut has been shown to take up DNA from genetically modified food under certain circumstances.

When viewed as a whole, GM foods are a disaster for the environment, an unviable solution to world hunger, and undoubtedly worse for your health.

GM Crops Fail to Live Up to Advertised Promises Again and Again

The fact remains that GM crops have failed to deliver on virtually every single promise and expectation. After 30 years of GMO experimentation, we have the data to show:No reduction in pesticides use; on the contrary, USDA data shows that GM crops has increased pesticide use by 50 million pounds from 1996 to 2003 in the U.S., and the use of glyphosate went up more than 15-fold between 1994 and 2005, along with increases in other herbicides to cope with rising glyphosate resistant superweeds.

GM crops do harm wildlife
, as revealed by UK and U.S. studies.

Bt resistant pests and Roundup tolerant superweeds render the two major GM crop traits useless. The evolution of Bt resistant bollworms worldwide have now been confirmed and documented.

Unpredictable transgene contamination is completely unavoidable, as science has recently revealed that the genome (whether plant, animal or human) is NOT constant and static, which is the scientific base for genetic engineering of plants and animals.

Instead, geneticists have discovered that the genome is remarkably dynamic and changeable, and constantly ‘conversing’ and adapting to the environment. This interaction determines which genes are turned on, when, where, by what and how much, and for how long. They’ve also found that the genetic material itself has the ability to be changed according to experience, passing it on to subsequent generations.

How to Avoid GM Foods

Avoiding GM products in your diet means avoiding an ever-growing number of ingredients, or choosing organic versions of them. This is not an easy task, especially if you eat processed food. However, the four most prevalent GM ingredients to look out for are:

  • Soy
  • Corn
  • Cottonseed
  • Canola 

You’ll also want to avoid the offspring of these products, which includes items like maltodextrin, soy lecithin, and high fructose corn syrup.

You CAN Demand Better Food

It’s easy to sit back and think you can’t do a thing to change the current state of affairs, but the fact is, you CAN make a difference. You can demand something better — food that is still food, grown the way nature intended.

First and foremost, you can vote with your pocketbook by avoiding everything that contains GM ingredients, and ask your local supermarket to stock their shelves with more natural organic foods. Some supermarkets will even allow you to special order food items.
And don’t forget about your elected officials. Let them know how you feel about it, and what kind of policies you’re willing to support.

  • People in certain professions can play a significant role to advance this cause as well:
  • Chefs, restaurants and food companies can switch to non-GM sources
  • Retailers can remove or label GM products or offer in-store Non-GMO Shopping Guides
  • Religious leaders can help to educate their congregation
  • Health practitioners can provide patient education materials
  • Those in the education world can help make school cafeterias GM-free
  • Reporters can expose the health risks
  •  

To get an idea of just how widespread GM ingredients are, I recommend taking a look at The GMO Food Guide. It lists 20 different food categories that include everything from baby food to chocolate.

And the incredible series Seeds of Doubt, written by staffers at the Sacramento Bee, can offer further guidance to fully understand the many problems associated with GM foods.

Last but not least, I urge everyone to watch the video The Future of Food, and forward the link to this video to your friends, family and acquaintances. This in-depth investigation into the disturbing truth behind genetically modified foods is one of the best documentaries made to date. It will help you understand how and why the genetic engineering we allow to be unleashed today is a very real threat to ALL future generations.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/06/06/Sowing-Seeds-of-Starvation-Monsanto-Hype-in-Growing-Food-Crisis.aspx

 

Processed people

Leave a comment

A new documentary about the effects of processed foods on our health and how eliminating processed foods can reverse diabetes, heart disease and other ailments.  Watch the trailer and order the video.

Vaccines……..How to create disease and genocide. A 2009 update

Leave a comment

I wrote this article just over a year ago.  I have updated the article to reflect the state of current events.  What may have seemed to be unrelated observations at that time now seem to be coalescing into what appears to be a staged pandemic.  Marti

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Original PPJG article:  Originally written and posted in May of 2008 

Author: Marti Oakley (c) 2008-2009mercurydees

 

 

 

 

 

It’s the perfect cover:  terrorize the public with the threat of a new disease, a coming pandemic and then magically produce a “vaccine” that will supposedly provide protection.  And isn’t this exactly where we are now?

My advice to all is to avoid any vaccines.  Although the perceived benefits of vaccinating against disease is firmly rooted in our minds, the facts about vaccines, their true uses and intents is far from beneficial and in fact actually the mechanism through which new diseases and pandemics are created. More

Monsanto: Aspartame……Put down that diet soda it can kill you!

Leave a comment

“Aspartame contains METHANOL, a serious metabolic poison. Your body converts it to formaldehyde (embalming fluid) and formic acid (ant sting poison) both of which attack your central nervous system and every organ of your body.”

 

Source:

http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/aspartame.htm

Aspartame – the silent killer

Aspartame is marketed as NutraSweet, Equal Spoonful, Benevia, NatraTaste and since the patent on it has now expired it likely will come on the market under many different names.

 

Undoubtedly you have heard that Aspartame is a safe sweetener and people use it to loose weight. Unfortunately that information is criminally false and misleading. You can find out more about how public relations firms shape and manipulate the public’s beliefs on the “Why you believe what you believe” page.

Aspartame is made of 3 components, 50% phenylalanine, 40% aspartic acid and 10% methanol (wood alcohol). In the body methanol breaks down into formaldehyde (embalming fluid) and formic acid.

Cytogenetic effects (changes in DNA) have been shown to result from FORMALDEHYDE exposure and DNA damage occurs from FORMALDEHYDE. The nature of the injury generally involves breaking and then creation of cross linking within the genetic material which alters the cells.

This finding has been confirmed numerous times and the DNA-protein-cross-links are believed to cause cancers in experimental animals. Changes in the genetic material is associated with cancer production in humans. The ability of Aspartame to cause cellular mutations has been shown through studies by Shephard, et al. There are increases in malignant brain tumors suggested to be associated with aspartame use. FORMALDEHYDE is a known stimulant for cancer and genetic damage in the cell.

Go here to read more of this expose’ on Monsanto’s killer product.

http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/aspartame.htm

This source of information provided by Les Lemke

 

 

Are You Getting Enough Fat in Your Diet?

Leave a comment

Are you getting enough fat in your diet? This may seem like an improbable question to most people and, indeed, after decades of being told by the FDA, the medical establishment and the media that fat is “bad” for us, it seems highly improbable that anyone would ask such a question. However, I ask you, nevertheless, and I believe I can supply the answer, as well: no.

For decades, we have been told that dietary fat – which was common to everyone’s diet for prior centuries, with no ill effects that we are aware of – is somehow the culprit in causing obesity and heart disease. Yet, as I shall show you, this is not only untrue, it is an outright lie, designed to deliberately create a population of obese sick people to sell drugs and medical services to, and that the medical establishment, the pharmaceuticals industry and the processed foods industry have all joined forces to promote, perpetuate and to profit immensely from this. They have, as their goal, not only the creation of a society of sick people, but actually seek to grow and expand that population of sick people, as these people are their bread and butter. Without a large population of people eating the foods that make them fat and sick, without a large population of people then seeking medical treatment for their various illnesses, without a large population of people buying various prescription drugs to “treat” their diseases, these three industries would go broke. The media aids this conspiracy – and it is a conspiracy – by creating and disseminating the propaganda necessary to convince us all, for decades, to eat a low fat diet and fat-free foods and to “just ask your doctor” for prescription drugs to treat the results of such a diet.

We all have a great deal of brainwashing to undo, regarding the role of fat in our diet. Contrary to the prevailing view that fat is “bad” for you, it is not only beneficial, but vital to your survival – and it does not cause atherosclerosis and heart disease, nor is it a causal factor in the development of cancer. In fact, fat actually protects your body from these conditions.

But, the main point I want to make is that the epidemic of obesity in our society is not caused by fat in our diet, but by the lack of fat in our diet. It is the introduction and widespread promotion of the low-fat diet and fat-free foods that have lead directly to the rise of obesity. How? First, you need to understand how your body works.

The body stores calories – from any type of food – as fat in order to build up a reserve energy source in the event of “famine.” If you are not supplying enough fat – or no fat at all – to your body, then it will be prompted to store more of what you eat as fat. Thus, the low-fat diet – and, in particular, fat-free foods, which are also laden with sugar – actually prompt more fat storage, not less. The result of eating a low-fat diet, then, is obesity. In contrast, if you are supplying your body with adequate dietary fat, your body will not feel the need to store as much fat. Thus, eating a high-fat diet has two effects: first, it supplies the body with enough fat to keep it from storing fat, and secondly, it satisfies your appetite more readily, thus keeping you from overeating.

If you have been eating a low fat diet and then change to a high fat diet, you will lose body fat as a result because your body will then store less fat, giving it an opportunity to burn off what it has stored.

Another myth that has been perpetrated upon us is that there is “good” fat and “bad” fat. The fact is that the so-called “bad” fat; i. e., saturated fat, is actually better for you than mono-unsaturated and poly-unsaturated fats – and is certainly better than trans-fats. Why? Because, again, it better satisfies your body’s need for fat and less of it is required to do so.

For more information on the myths and lies we’ve been told about fat, see the following:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0675/is_n3_v15/ai_19408662

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNOFSpVx8Ts

http://www.thestar.com/article/243632

http://stronglifts.com/4-common-fat-myths-you-believe-in/

http://www.beinghealthynaturally.com/eatinghealthy/healthy6.htm

http://www.fitnessandfreebies.com/fitness/fat.html

http://trusted.md/blog/vreni_gurd/2007/04/06/saturated_fat_the_misunderstood_nutrient

http://www.preventionisbest.com/site/saturatedfat.html

http://www.amazon.com/Eat-Fat-Look-Thin-Permanently/dp/0941599620/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1204414255&sr=8-4

http://www.amazon.com/Eat-Fat-Lose-Delicious-Science-based/dp/1594630054/ref=sr_1_33?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1204414848&sr=8-33

 

Whats in your Gardasil??

3 Comments

After reading numerous reports on the pro’s and con’s of Gardasil I decided I needed to check into this a little more.  I was stunned to find out that Gardasil contains;

Polysorbate 80….which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Sodium Borate….Used to kill roaches and is considered a dangerous poison.

Formaldehyde… Used for embalming

Aluminum………at the rate of 225 mcg per each of three doses (total 675mcg) a toxic level.

Gardasil is a recombinant vaccine.  Recombinant vaccines are constructed by the use of either yeast or bacteria to produce massive quanitites of an individual viral or bacterial protein based on DNA sequencing technology.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/recombinant+vaccine

recombinant vaccine…..one created by recombinant DNA technology

Recombinant vaccines are created by utilizing bacteria or yeast to produce large quantities of a single viral or bacterial protein. This protein is then purified and injected into the patient, and the patient’s immune system makes antibodies to the disease agent’s protein, protecting the patient from natural disease.

Advantages of the recombinant vaccine technology are that there is virtually no chance of the host becoming ill from the agent, since it is just a single protein, not the organism itself. Traditional vaccine risks come from the organism not being totally weakened (attenuated) or a reversion to a virulent (disease causing) form. Another advantage of a recombinant vaccine is that it does not need an adjuvant. An adjuvant is an agent that stimulates (irritates) the immune system to find and react to the vaccine agent. Some adjuvants have been implicated in causing cancer in some animals over time.

Advantages of the recombinant vaccine technology are that there is virtually no chance of the host becoming ill from the agent, since it is just a single protein, not the organism itself.

If this statement is true…………why are young girls dying from the administration of Gardasil?  Why are so many becoming ill after even the first injection?

For some answers to these and other nagging questions about the attempts to forcibly vaccinate our young women against a virus with no link to cancer go here>>>>

 

http://www.vaclib.org/news/2006/gardasil.htm

Vaccination Liberation – Information

 

Update for 2007

December 2007, “HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed:

·  The FDA has stated “HPV is not associated with cervical cancer.”

·  Evidence shows HPV vaccines actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6% in some women.

·  The FDA has admitted that “most [HPV] infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer.”

·  Why mandatory vaccination policies ultimately lead to the harming of young women.

·  [JAMA]… rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced by vaccination.”

·  The real story behind the HPV vaccination frenzy: Disease mongering, corporate profits and junk science. More on the HPV Vaccine Hoax

 

Vaccines also contain aluminum, used to excite the immune system of the body, and which considerably boosts the toxicity of mercury. When injected into children the mixture readily overpowers their nervous system to cause severe brain, neurological and allied damage.

If you know of a young woman who has been forcibly vaccinated with Gardasil and who has suffered adverse reactions including infertility, please send us your story.

Marti Oakley

 

 

 

 

Gardasil…..A Sc-Fi Vaccine (video)

Leave a comment

 

Imagine an expensive and painful vaccine that…

* “treats” a minor disease that usually

goes away without symptoms and is

easily avoidable through simple precautions

* claims to prevent cancer – and doesn’t

* actually increases risks of medical complications by nearly 50% in untested recipients who may already have this minor disease

And here’s the punchline:

Politicians throughout the world would

like to legally FORCE this vaccine on young girls against their parent’s wishes.

This is not a science fiction nightmare.

It’s the latest from the medical-military-media industrial complex and your daughters are the guinea pigs.

If you have daughters, nieces, or grandchildren, I strongly recommend you watch this video.

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukQL_CW5nx0– Brasscheck

P.S. Thanks to your support this video, produced by Goodman Green for Brasscheck TV, is already the

#1 most favorited Science and Technology video on YouTube and the #2 top rated.

Please visit and share this important new video

Click on Brasscheck in our blogroll to see all the videos offered by Brasscheck TV. 

FDA Wants Big Pharma to Use Terminally Ill Patients as Guinea Pigs for Unapproved Drugs

Leave a comment

Excerpted: 

“(NaturalNews) The FDA has proposed allowing the testing of experimental drugs on terminally ill patients once the drugs have passed the first safety testing phase, but before they have received final approval. The plan has already sparked controversy, with physicians staking out positions both for and against the proposed rule change.”

Tuesday, February 12, 2008 by: David Gutierrez

%d bloggers like this: